Search Results

Search found 2258 results on 91 pages for 'abstract algebra'.

Page 21/91 | < Previous Page | 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  | Next Page >

  • rails question find no result

    - by Small Wolf
    Hey.Guys! Now .I have a question ,i want someone to help me to solve it ,the log of the problem like the under text >> Department.find(EmeReference.find(:all,:select =>:ref_config_id,:conditions=>"emergency_id = 1")) ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound: Couldn't find Department with ID=0 from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.2/lib/active_record/base.rb:1591:in `find_one' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.2/lib/active_record/base.rb:1574:in `find_from_ids_without_cache' from (__DELEGATION__):2:in `__send__' from (__DELEGATION__):2:in `find_from_ids_without_cache' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/nkallen-cache-money-0.2.5/lib/cash/query/abstract.rb:158:in `find_from_keys' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/nkallen-cache-money-0.2.5/lib/cash/query/primary_key.rb:31:in `miss' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/nkallen-cache-money-0.2.5/lib/cash/query/abstract.rb:66:in `hit_or_miss' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/nkallen-cache-money-0.2.5/lib/cash/accessor.rb:17:in `call' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/nkallen-cache-money-0.2.5/lib/cash/accessor.rb:17:in `fetch' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/nkallen-cache-money-0.2.5/lib/cash/accessor.rb:29:in `get' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/nkallen-cache-money-0.2.5/lib/cash/query/abstract.rb:65:in `hit_or_miss' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/nkallen-cache-money-0.2.5/lib/cash/query/abstract.rb:18:in `perform' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/nkallen-cache-money-0.2.5/lib/cash/query/primary_key.rb:17:in `perform' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/nkallen-cache-money-0.2.5/lib/cash/query/abstract.rb:7:in `perform' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/nkallen-cache-money-0.2.5/lib/cash/finders.rb:29:in `find_from_ids' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.2/lib/active_record/base.rb:616:in `find' from (irb):135 that's the question! Thank your and best regards!

    Read the article

  • Java Generics name clash, method not correctly overriden

    - by Shervin
    Hi. I have seen different questions regarding this, but I still find this topic to be very confusing. All I want to do, is have an abstract class that implements an interface, and have a class extending this abstract class so that the hard class needs to implement getKommune() and setKommune(Kommune kommune), but not the other method, because that is in the abstract class. I have the following interface. public interface KommuneFilter { <E extends AbstractKommune<?>> void addKommuneFromCurrentUser(E e); Kommune getKommune(); void setKommune(Kommune kommune); } And this Abstract class public abstract class AbstractKommune<E extends AbstractKommune<?>> implements KommuneFilter { @PrePersist void addKommuneFromCurrentUser(E e) { } } And I want to use it like this public class Person extends AbstractKommune<Person> { private Kommune kommune; public void setKommune(Kommune kommune) {this.kommune=kommune;} public Kommune getKommune() {return kommune;} } However, I get Name clash: The method of has the same erasure of type but does not override it Why isn't it correctly overriden?

    Read the article

  • Spring: Using "Lookup method injection" for my ThreadFactory looks not scalable.

    - by Michael Bavin
    Hi, We're building a ThreadFactory so everytime a singleton controller needs a new thread, i get a new instance everytime. Looking at Lookup method injection looks good but what if we have multiple threads. like: public abstract class ThreadManager { public abstract Thread createThreadDoA(); public abstract Thread createThreadDoB(); } and config: <bean id="threadManager" class="bla.ThreadManager" singleton="true"> <lookup-method name="createThreadA" bean="threadA" /> <lookup-method name="createThreadB" bean="threadB"/> </bean> <bean id="threadA" class="bla.ThreadA"> <bean id="threadB" class="bla.ThreadB"> and usage: threadManager.createThreadA(); I don't want to create an abstract "create" method for every new threadclass. Is it possible to make this generich like: threadManager.createThread(ThreadA.class); Thank you

    Read the article

  • Spring.net is not injecting chained base class properties!

    - by JohnIdol
    I am successfully injecting base class properties with spring.net with just a class that inherits from a base abstract class. Lets say Class MyClass : MyBase, and I am successfully setting a property like this: <object id="myInstantiableClass" type="myAssembly.MyClass myAssenbly" abstract="true"> <property name="MyBaseClassProperty" ref="anotherObjRef"></property> </object> Where MyBaseClassProperty is a property on the base class. Now I have another abstract class between the old base class and the instantiable class, and I am trying to set properties on both the abstract classes. So MyClass : MyNewBaseClass, and MyNewBaseClass : MyBaseClass. I have an additional property on the new base class (MyNewBaseClassProperty) and I am trying to inject it like this: <object id="myInstantiableClass" type="myAssembly.MyClass myAssenbly" abstract="true"> <property name="MyBaseClassProperty" ref="anotherObjRef"></property> <property name="MyNewBaseClassProperty" ref="someOtherObjRef"></property> </object> The property on the old base class is being injected but the one on the new one is not - and I am not getting an error or anything (so I am pretty sure my config is good), that property is just null! Any help appreciated! P.S. I am on asp.net (not MVC) but I don't think it's related.

    Read the article

  • Strange Scala error.

    - by Lukasz Lew
    I tried to create abstract turn based Game and abstract AI: abstract class AGame { type Player type Move // Player inside def actPlayer : Player def moves (player : Player) : Iterator[Move] def play (move : Move) def undo () def isFinished : Boolean def result (player : Player) : Double } abstract class Ai[Game <: AGame] { def genMove (player : Game#Player) : Game#Move } class DummyGame extends AGame { type Player = Unit type Move = Unit def moves (player : Player) = new Iterator[Move] { def hasNext = false def next = throw new Exception ("asd") } def actPlayer = () def play (move : Move) { } def undo () { } def isFinished = true def result (player : Player) = 0 } class DummyAi[Game <: AGame] (game : Game) extends Ai[Game] { override def genMove (player : Game#Player) : Game#Move = { game.moves (player).next } } I thought that I have to use this strange type accessors like Game#Player. I get very puzzling error. I would like to understand it: [error] /home/lew/Devel/CGSearch/src/main/scala/Main.scala:41: type mismatch; [error] found : Game#Player [error] required: DummyAi.this.game.Player [error] game.moves (player).next [error] ^

    Read the article

  • PHPUnit: Testing if a protected method was called

    - by Luiz Damim
    I´m trying to test if a protected method is called in a public interface. <?php abstract class SomeClassAbstract { abstract public foo(); public function doStuff() { $this->_protectedMethod(); } protected function _protectedMethod(); { // implementation is irrelevant } } <?php class MyTest extends PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase { public function testCalled() { $mock = $this->getMockForAbstractClass('SomeClass'); $mock->expects($this->once()) ->method('_protectedMethod'); $mock->doStuff(); } } I know it is called correctly, but PHPUnit says its never called. The same happens when I test the other way, when a method is never called: <?php abstract class AnotherClassAbstract { abstract public foo(); public function doAnotherStuff() { $this->_loadCache(); } protected function _loadCache(); { // implementation is irrelevant } } <?php class MyTest extends PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase { public function testCalled() { $mock = $this->getMockForAbstractClass('AnotherClass'); $mock->expects($this->once()) ->method('_loadCache'); $mock->doAnotherStuff(); } } The method is called but PHPUnit says that it is not. What I´m doing wrong? Edit I wasn´t declaring my methods with double colons, it was just for denoting that it was a public method (interface). Updated to full class/methods declarations. Edit 2 I should have said that I´m testing some method implementations in an abstract class (edited the code to reflect this). Since I can not instantiate the class, how can I test this? I´m thinking in creating an SomeClassSimple extending SomeClassAbstract and testing this one instead. Is it the right approach?

    Read the article

  • NullPointerException with static variables

    - by tomekK
    I just hit very strange (to me) behaviour of java. I have following classes: public abstract class Unit { public static final Unit KM = KMUnit.INSTANCE; public static final Unit METERS = MeterUnit.INSTANCE; protected Unit() { } public abstract double getValueInUnit(double value, Unit unit); protected abstract double getValueInMeters(double value); } And: public class KMUnit extends Unit { public static final Unit INSTANCE = new KMUnit(); private KMUnit() { } //here are abstract methods overriden } public class MeterUnit extends Unit { public static final Unit INSTANCE = new MeterUnit(); private MeterUnit() { } ///abstract methods overriden } And my test case: public class TestMetricUnits extends TestCase { @Test public void testConversion() { System.out.println("Unit.METERS: " + Unit.METERS); System.out.println("Unit.KM: " + Unit.KM); double meters = Unit.KM.getValueInUnit(102.11, Unit.METERS); assertEquals(0.10211, meters, 0.00001); } } 1) MKUnit and MeterUnit are both singletons initialized statically, so during class loading. Constructors are private, so they can't be initialized anywhere else. 2) Unit class contains static final references to MKUnit.INSTANCE and MeterUnit.INSTANCE I would expect that: KMUnit class is loaded and instance is created. MeterUnit class is loaded and instance is created. Unit class is loaded and both KM and METERS variable are initialized, they are final so they cant be changed. But when I run my test case in console with maven my result is: T E S T S Running de.audi.echargingstations.tests.TestMetricUnits Unit.METERS: m Unit.KM: null Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.089 sec <<< FAILURE! - in de.audi.echargingstations.tests.TestMetricUnits testConversion(de.audi.echargingstations.tests.TestMetricUnits) Time elapsed: 0.011 sec <<< ERROR! java.lang.NullPointerException: null at de.audi.echargingstations.tests.TestMetricUnits.testConversion(TestMetricUnits.java:29) Results : Tests in error: TestMetricUnits.testConversion:29 NullPointer And the funny part is that, when I run this test from eclipse via JUnit runner everything is fine, I have no NullPointerException and in console I have: Unit.METERS: m Unit.KM: km So the question is: what can be the reason that KM variable in Unit is null (and in the same time METERS is not null)

    Read the article

  • Is it good to subclass a class only to separate some functional parts?

    - by prostynick
    Suppose we have abstract class A (all examples in C#) public abstract class A { private Foo foo; public A() { } public void DoSomethingUsingFoo() { //stuff } public void DoSomethingElseUsingFoo() { //stuff } //a lot of other stuff... } But we are able to split it into two classes A and B: public abstract class A { public A() { } //a lot of stuff... } public abstract class B : A { private Foo foo; public B() : base() { } public void DoSomethingUsingFoo() { //stuff } public void DoSomethingElseUsingFoo() { //stuff } //nothing else or just some overrides of A stuff } That's good, but we are 99.99% sure, that no one will ever subclass A, because functionality in B is very important. Is it still good to have two separate classes only to split some code into two parts and to separate functional elements?

    Read the article

  • Mixing table per subclass and per hierarchy in hibernate

    - by Xelluloid
    In my database there are two three tables. The first one, table ABSTRACT, holds three columns id, type, someText This table contains all abstract information for the abstract class abstract. Now the two tables CONCRETEONE and CONCRETETWO contain all information for the concrete classes concreteOne and concreteTwo. Now I know I could use the table per subclass strategy from hibernate to create a mapping with inheritance. But as I have a column that marks the type of the concrete implementation could it be possible to create some mixed behaviour like a table per subclass strategy with an discriminator?

    Read the article

  • Set property with reflection after Fluent Nhibernates automapping has occured?

    - by Marcus
    I have an abstract baseclass with a collection of details IList that is automapped with fnh. After it has been populated with the correct values i would like to set some properties with reflection on the my class that inherits the abstract baseclass. I have tried to accomplish this in the constructor of my abstract baseclass but obviously my Details collection is empty when the occurs so my question is, what is the recommended way of doing this?

    Read the article

  • C# Virtual method call in constructor - how to refactor?

    - by Cristi Diaconescu
    I have an abstract class for database-agnostic cursor actions. Derived from that, there are classes that implement the abstract methods for handling database-specific stuff. The problem is, the base class ctor needs to call an abstract method - when the ctor is called, it needs to initialize the database-specific cursor. I know why this shouldn't be done, I don't need that explanation! This is my first implementation, that obviously doesn't work - it's the textbook "wrong way" of doing it. The overridden method accesses a field from the derived class, which is not yet instantiated: public abstract class CursorReader { private readonly int m_rowCount; protected CursorReader() { m_rowCount = CreateCursor(sqlCmd); //virtual call ! } protected abstract int CreateCursor(string sqlCmd); } public class SqlCursorReader : CursorReader { private SqlConnection m_sqlConnection; public SqlCursorReader(string sqlCmd, SqlConnection sqlConnection) { m_sqlConnection = sqlConnection; //field initialized here } protected override int CreateCursor(string sqlCmd) { //uses not-yet-initialized member *m_sqlConnection* //so this throws a NullReferenceException var cursor = new CustomCursor(sqlCmd, m_sqlConnection); return cursor.Count(); } } I will follow up with an answer on my attempts to fix this...

    Read the article

  • Inheritance in XML Schema definition (XSD) for Java objects

    - by bguiz
    Hi, I need to create an XML schema definition (XSD) that describes Java objects. I was wondering how to do this when the objects in question inherit from a common base class with a type parameter. public abstract class Rule<T> { ... } public abstract class TimeRule extends Rule<XTime> { ... } public abstract class LocationRule extends Rule<Location> { ... } public abstract class IntRule extends Rule<Integer> { ... } .... (where XTime and Location are custom classes define elsewhere) How would I go about constructing an XSD that such that I can have XML nodes that represent each of the subclasses of Rule<T> - without the XSD for each of them repeating their common contents? Thank you!

    Read the article

  • implementing a read/write field for an interface that only defines read

    - by PaulH
    I have a C# 2.0 application where a base interface allows read-only access to a value in a concrete class. But, within the concrete class, I'd like to have read/write access to that value. So, I have an implementation like this: public abstract class Base { public abstract DateTime StartTime { get; } } public class Foo : Base { DateTime start_time_; public override DateTime StartTime { get { return start_time_; } internal set { start_time_ = value; } } } But, this gives me the error: Foo.cs(200,22): error CS0546: 'Foo.StartTime.set': cannot override because 'Base.StartTime' does not have an overridable set accessor I don't want the base class to have write access. But, I do want the concrete class to provide read/write access. Is there a way to make this work? Thanks, PaulH Unfortunately, Base can't be changed to an interface as it contains non-abstract functionality also. Something I should have thought to put in the original problem description. public abstract class Base { public abstract DateTime StartTime { get; } public void Buzz() { // do something interesting... } } My solution is to do this: public class Foo : Base { DateTime start_time_; public override DateTime StartTime { get { return start_time_; } } internal void SetStartTime { start_time_ = value; } } It's not as nice as I'd like, but it works.

    Read the article

  • Custom Image Button and Radio/Toggle Button from Common Base Class

    - by Wonko the Sane
    Hi All, I would like to create a set of custom controls that are basically image buttons (it's a little more complex than that, but that's the underlying effect I'm going for) that I've seen a few different examples for. However, I would like to further extend that to also allow radio/toggle buttons. What I'd like to do is have a common abstract class called ImageButtonBase that has default implementations for ImageSource and Text, etc. That makes a regular ImageButton implementation pretty easy. The issue I am having is creating the RadioButton flavor of it. As I see it, there are at least three options: It would be easy to create something that derives from RadioButton, but then I can't use the abstract class I've created. I could change the abstract class to an interface, but then I lose the abstract implementations, and will in fact have duplication of code. I could derive from my abstract class, and re-implement the RadioButton-type properties and events (IsChecked, GroupName, etc.), but that certainly doesn't seem like a great idea. Note: I have seen http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2362641/how-to-get-a-group-of-toggle-buttons-to-act-like-radio-buttons-in-wpf, but what I want to do is a little more complex. I'm just wondering if anybody has an example of an implementation, or something that might be adapted to this kind of scenario. I can see pros and cons of each of the ideas above, but each comes with potential pitfalls. Thanks, wTs

    Read the article

  • Correct usage of "<T extends SuperClass>"

    - by yusaku
    I am not familiar with "Generics". Is it a correct use of "<T extends SuperClass>" ? And do you agree that the codes after using generics are better? Before using Generics ================================================= public abstract class SuperSample { public void getSomething(boolean isProcessA) { doProcessX(); if(isProcessA){ doProcessY(new SubASample()); }else{ doProcessY(new SubBSample()); } } protected abstract void doProcessX(); protected void doProcessY(SubASample subASample) { // Nothing to do } protected void doProcessY(SubBSample subBSample) { // Nothing to do } } public class SubASample extends SuperSample { @Override protected void doProcessX() { System.out.println("doProcessX in SubASample"); } @Override protected void doProcessY(SubASample subASample) { System.out.println("doProcessY in SubASample"); } } public class Sample { public static void main(String[] args) { SubASample subASample = new SubASample(); subASample.getSomething(true); } } After using Generics ================================================= public abstract class SuperSample { public void getSomething(boolean isProcessA) { doProcessX(); if(isProcessA){ doProcessY(new SubASample()); }else{ doProcessY(new SubBSample()); } } protected abstract void doProcessX(); protected abstract <T extends SuperSample> void doProcessY(T subSample); } public class SubASample extends SuperSample { @Override protected void doProcessX() { System.out.println("doProcessX in SubASample"); } @Override protected <T extends SuperSample> void doProcessY(T subSample) { System.out.println("doProcessY in SubASample"); } } public class Sample { public static void main(String[] args) { SubASample subASample = new SubASample(); subASample.getSomething(true); } }

    Read the article

  • Best loose way to get objects with common base class

    - by Michael Teper
    I struggled to come up with a good title for this question, so suggestions are welcome. Let's say we have an abstract base class ActionBase that looks something like this: public abstract class ActionBase { public abstract string Name { get; } public abstract string Description { get; } // rest of declaration follows } And we have a bunch of different actions defined, like a MoveFileAction, WriteToRegistryAction, etc. These actions get attached to Worker objects: public class Worker { private IList<ActionBase> _actions = new List<ActionBase>(); public IList<ActionBase> Actions { get { return _actions; } } // worker stuff ... } So far, pretty straight-forward. Now, I'd like to have a UI for setting up Workers, assigning Actions, setting properties, and so on. In this UI, I want to present a list of all available actions, along with their properties, and for that I'd want to first gather up all the names and descriptions of available actions (plus the type) into a collection of the following type of item: public class ActionDescriptor { public string Name { get; } public string Description { get; } poblic Type Type { get; } } Certainly, I can use reflection to do this, but is there a better way? Having Name and Description be instance properties of ActionBase (as opposed to statics on derived classes) smells a bit, but there isn't an abstract static in C#. Thank you!

    Read the article

  • C# Type comparison

    - by Sean.C
    This has me pooped, is there any reason the following: public abstract class aExtension { public abstract bool LoadExtension(Constants c); // method required in inherit public abstract string AppliesToModule // property required in inherit { get; } public abstract string ExtensionName // property required in inherit { get; } public abstract string ExtensionDescription // property required in inherit { get; } } public class UK : aExtension { public override bool LoadExtension(Constants c) { return true; } public override string AppliesToModule { get { return "string"; } } public override string ExtensionName { get { return "string"; } } public override string ExtensionDescription { get { return "string"; } } } would return false for the following expressions: bool a = t.IsAssignableFrom(aExtension)); bool b = t.BaseType.IsAssignableFrom(aExtension)); bool c = typeof(aExtension).IsAssignableFrom(t); bool d = typeof(aExtension).IsAssignableFrom(t.BaseType); bool e = typeof(aExtension).IsSubclassOf(t); bool f = typeof(aExtension).IsSubclassOf(t.BaseType); bool g = t.IsSubclassOf(typeof(aExtension)); bool h = t.BaseType.IsSubclassOf(typeof(LBT.AdMeter.aExtension)); bool i = t.BaseType.Equals(typeof(aExtension)); bool j = typeof(aExtension).Equals(t.BaseType); T is the reflected Type from the calss UK. Stange thing is i do the exact same thing just on an external assembly in the same application and it works as expected...

    Read the article

  • using Generics in C# [closed]

    - by Uphaar Goyal
    I have started looking into using generics in C#. As an example what i have done is that I have an abstract class which implements generic methods. these generic methods take a sql query, a connection string and the Type T as parameters and then construct the data set, populate the object and return it back. This way each business object does not need to have a method to populate it with data or construct its data set. All we need to do is pass the type, the sql query and the connection string and these methods do the rest.I am providing the code sample here. I am just looking to discuss with people who might have a better solution to what i have done. using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.Data; using System.Data.SqlClient; using MWTWorkUnitMgmtLib.Business; using System.Collections.ObjectModel; using System.Reflection; namespace MWTWorkUnitMgmtLib.TableGateway { public abstract class TableGateway { public TableGateway() { } protected abstract string GetConnection(); protected abstract string GetTableName(); public DataSet GetDataSetFromSql(string connectionString, string sql) { DataSet ds = null; using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString)) using (SqlCommand command = connection.CreateCommand()) { command.CommandText = sql; connection.Open(); using (ds = new DataSet()) using (SqlDataAdapter adapter = new SqlDataAdapter(command)) { adapter.Fill(ds); } } return ds; } public static bool ContainsColumnName(DataRow dr, string columnName) { return dr.Table.Columns.Contains(columnName); } public DataTable GetDataTable(string connString, string sql) { DataSet ds = GetDataSetFromSql(connString, sql); DataTable dt = null; if (ds != null) { if (ds.Tables.Count 0) { dt = ds.Tables[0]; } } return dt; } public T Construct(DataRow dr, T t) where T : class, new() { Type t1 = t.GetType(); PropertyInfo[] properties = t1.GetProperties(); foreach (PropertyInfo property in properties) { if (ContainsColumnName(dr, property.Name) && (dr[property.Name] != null)) property.SetValue(t, dr[property.Name], null); } return t; } public T GetByID(string connString, string sql, T t) where T : class, new() { DataTable dt = GetDataTable(connString, sql); DataRow dr = dt.Rows[0]; return Construct(dr, t); } public List GetAll(string connString, string sql, T t) where T : class, new() { List collection = new List(); DataTable dt = GetDataTable(connString, sql); foreach (DataRow dr in dt.Rows) collection.Add(Construct(dr, t)); return collection; } } }

    Read the article

  • SQL SERVER – Automated Type Conversion using Expressor Studio

    - by pinaldave
    Recently I had an interesting situation during my consultation project. Let me share to you how I solved the problem using Expressor Studio. Consider a situation in which you need to read a field, such as customer_identifier, from a text file and pass that field into a database table. In the source file’s metadata structure, customer_identifier is described as a string; however, in the target database table, customer_identifier is described as an integer. Legitimately, all the source values for customer_identifier are valid numbers, such as “109380”. To implement this in an ETL application, you probably would have hard-coded a type conversion function call, such as: output.customer_identifier=stringToInteger(input.customer_identifier) That wasn’t so bad, was it? For this instance, programming this hard-coded type conversion function call was relatively easy. However, hard-coding, whether type conversion code or other business rule code, almost always means that the application containing hard-coded fields, function calls, and values is: a) specific to an instance of use; b) is difficult to adapt to new situations; and c) doesn’t contain many reusable sub-parts. Therefore, in the long run, applications with hard-coded type conversion function calls don’t scale well. In addition, they increase the overall level of effort and degree of difficulty to write and maintain the ETL applications. To get around the trappings of hard-coding type conversion function calls, developers need an access to smarter typing systems. Expressor Studio product offers this feature exactly, by providing developers with a type conversion automation engine based on type abstraction. The theory behind the engine is quite simple. A user specifies abstract data fields in the engine, and then writes applications against the abstractions (whereas in most ETL software, developers develop applications against the physical model). When a Studio-built application is run, Studio’s engine automatically converts the source type to the abstracted data field’s type and converts the abstracted data field’s type to the target type. The engine can do this because it has a couple of built-in rules for type conversions. So, using the example above, a developer could specify customer_identifier as an abstract data field with a type of integer when using Expressor Studio. Upon reading the string value from the text file, Studio’s type conversion engine automatically converts the source field from the type specified in the source’s metadata structure to the abstract field’s type. At the time of writing the data value to the target database, the engine doesn’t have any work to do because the abstract data type and the target data type are just the same. Had they been different, the engine would have automatically provided the conversion. ?Reference: Pinal Dave (http://blog.SQLAuthority.com) Filed under: Database, Pinal Dave, SQL, SQL Authority, SQL Query, SQL Scripts, SQL Server, SQL Tips and Tricks, SQLAuthority News, T SQL, Technology Tagged: SSIS

    Read the article

  • Retrieving Custom Attributes Using Reflection

    - by Scott Dorman
    The .NET Framework allows you to easily add metadata to your classes by using attributes. These attributes can be ones that the .NET Framework already provides, of which there are over 300, or you can create your own. Using reflection, the ways to retrieve the custom attributes of a type are: System.Reflection.MemberInfo public abstract object[] GetCustomAttributes(bool inherit); public abstract object[] GetCustomAttributes(Type attributeType, bool inherit); public abstract bool IsDefined(Type attributeType, bool inherit); System.Attribute public static Attribute[] GetCustomAttributes(MemberInfo member, bool inherit); public static bool IsDefined(MemberInfo element, Type attributeType, bool inherit); If you take the following simple class hierarchy: public abstract class BaseClass { private bool result;   [DefaultValue(false)] public virtual bool SimpleProperty { get { return this.result; } set { this.result = value; } } }   public class DerivedClass : BaseClass { public override bool SimpleProperty { get { return true; } set { base.SimpleProperty = value; } } } Given a PropertyInfo object (which is derived from MemberInfo, and represents a propery in reflection), you might expect that these methods would return the same result. Unfortunately, that isn’t the case. The MemberInfo methods strictly reflect the metadata definitions, ignoring the inherit parameter and not searching the inheritance chain when used with a PropertyInfo, EventInfo, or ParameterInfo object. It also returns all custom attribute instances, including those that don’t inherit from System.Attribute. The Attribute methods are closer to the implied behavior of the language (and probably closer to what you would naturally expect). They do respect the inherit parameter for PropertyInfo, EventInfo, and ParameterInfo objects and search the implied inheritance chain defined by the associated methods (in this case, the property accessors). These methods also only return custom attributes that inherit from System.Attribute. This is a fairly subtle difference that can produce very unexpected results if you aren’t careful. For example, to retrieve the custom  attributes defined on SimpleProperty, you could use code similar to this: PropertyInfo info = typeof(DerivedClass).GetProperty("SimpleProperty"); var attributeList1 = info.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(DefaultValueAttribute), true)); var attributeList2 = Attribute.GetCustomAttributes(info, typeof(DefaultValueAttribute), true));   The attributeList1 array will be empty while the attributeList2 array will contain the attribute instance, as expected. Technorati Tags: Reflection,Custom Attributes,PropertyInfo

    Read the article

  • What is a good resource for learning how the .Net Framework works? [on hold]

    - by Till Death Developer
    I've been developing web apps, for a while now so i know how to get the job done, what i don't know is how every thing really works, i know some but the rest i can't get a grasp on like how abstract works, what happens when i instantiate an object from a class that inherits from an abstract class?, where things get stored Heap vs Stack?, in other words the Interview questions that i suck at, so any advice would be great, books, videos, online courses, whatever you can provide would really help me.

    Read the article

  • Speaking at PASS 2012… Exciting and Scary… As usual…

    - by drsql
    I have been selected this year at the PASS Summit 2012 to do two sessions, and they are both going to be interesting. Pre-Con: Relational Database Design Workshop - Abstract Triggers: Born Evil or Misunderstood? - Abstract The pre-con session entitled Relational Database Design Workshop will be (at least) the third time I will have done this pre-con session, and I am pretty excited to take it to a bit larger scale. The one big change that I am forcing this time is a limit on the lecture time. Each...(read more)

    Read the article

  • Asp.NET custom templated datalist throws argument out of range (index) on button press

    - by MrTortoise
    I have a class BaseTemplate public abstract class BaseTemplate : ITemplate This adds the controls, and provides abstract methods to implement in the inheriting class. The inheriting class then adds its html according to its data source and manages the data binding. This all works fine - I get the control appearing with properly parsed html. The problem is that the base class adds controls into the template that have their own CommandName arguments; the idea is that the class that implements the custom templated dataList will provide the logic of setting the Selected and Edit Indexes. This class also manages the data binding, etc. It sets all of the templates on the datalist in the Init method (which was another cause of this exception). The exception gets thrown when I hit one of these buttons - I have tried hooking up both their click and command events everywhere in case this was the problem. I have also ensured that their command names do not match any of the system ones. The stack trace does not include any references to my methods or objects which is why I am so stuck. It is the most unhelpful message I can imagine. The really frustrating thing is that I cannot get a breakpoint to fire - i.e. the problem is happening after I click the button, but before and of my code can execute. The last time this exception happened was when I had this code in a user control and was assigning the templates to the datalist in the PageLoad. I moved these into init to fix that problem; however, this is a problem that was there then and I have no idea what is causing it let alone how to solve it (and index out of range doesn't really help without knowing what index.) The Exception Details Exception Details: System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: Specified argument was out of the range of valid values. Parameter name: index The Stack Trace: [ArgumentOutOfRangeException: Specified argument was out of the range of valid values. Parameter name: index] System.Web.UI.ControlCollection.get_Item(Int32 index) +8665582 System.Web.UI.WebControls.DataList.GetItem(ListItemType itemType, Int32 repeatIndex) +8667655 System.Web.UI.WebControls.DataList.System.Web.UI.WebControls.IRepeatInfoUser.GetItemStyle(ListItemType itemType, Int32 repeatIndex) +11 System.Web.UI.WebControls.RepeatInfo.RenderVerticalRepeater(HtmlTextWriter writer, IRepeatInfoUser user, Style controlStyle, WebControl baseControl) +8640873 System.Web.UI.WebControls.RepeatInfo.RenderRepeater(HtmlTextWriter writer, IRepeatInfoUser user, Style controlStyle, WebControl baseControl) +27 System.Web.UI.WebControls.DataList.RenderContents(HtmlTextWriter writer) +208 System.Web.UI.WebControls.BaseDataList.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) +30 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControlInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +27 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +99 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer) +25 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ICollection children) +134 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildren(HtmlTextWriter writer) +19 System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm.RenderChildren(HtmlTextWriter writer) +163 System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlContainerControl.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) +32 System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm.Render(HtmlTextWriter output) +51 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControlInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +27 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +99 System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer) +40 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ICollection children) +134 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildren(HtmlTextWriter writer) +19 System.Web.UI.Page.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) +29 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControlInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +27 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +99 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer) +25 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +1266 The code Base class: public abstract class BaseTemplate : ITemplate { ListItemType _templateType; public BaseTemplate(ListItemType theTemplateType) { _templateType = theTemplateType; } public ListItemType ListItemType { get { return _templateType; } } #region ITemplate Members public void InstantiateIn(Control container) { PlaceHolder ph = new PlaceHolder(); container.Controls.Add(ph); Literal l = new Literal(); switch (_templateType) { case ListItemType.Header: { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<table><tr>")); InstantiateInHeader(ph); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</tr>")); break; } case ListItemType.Footer: { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<tr>")); InstantiateInFooter(ph); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</tr></table>")); break; } case ListItemType.Item: { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<tr>")); InstantiateInItem(ph); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>")); Button select = new Button(); select.ID = "btnSelect"; select.CommandName = "SelectRow"; select.Text = "Select"; ph.Controls.Add(select); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td>")); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</tr>")); ph.DataBinding += new EventHandler(ph_DataBinding); break; } case ListItemType.AlternatingItem: { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<tr>")); InstantiateInAlternatingItem(ph); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>")); Button select = new Button(); select.ID = "btnSelect"; select.CommandName = "SelectRow"; select.Text = "Select"; ph.Controls.Add(select); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td>")); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</tr>")); ph.DataBinding+=new EventHandler(ph_DataBinding); break; } case ListItemType.SelectedItem: { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<tr>")); InstantiateInItem(ph); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>")); Button edit = new Button(); edit.ID = "btnEdit"; edit.CommandName = "EditRow"; edit.Text = "Edit"; ph.Controls.Add(edit); Button delete = new Button(); delete.ID = "btnDelete"; delete.CommandName = "DeleteRow"; delete.Text = "Delete"; ph.Controls.Add(delete); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td>")); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</tr>")); ph.DataBinding += new EventHandler(ph_DataBinding); break; } case ListItemType.EditItem: { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<tr>")); InstantiateInEdit(ph); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>")); Button save = new Button(); save.ID = "btnSave"; save.CommandName = "SaveRow"; save.Text = "Save"; ph.Controls.Add(save); Button cancel = new Button(); cancel.ID = "btnCancel"; cancel.CommandName = "CancelRow"; cancel.Text = "Cancel"; ph.Controls.Add(cancel); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td>")); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</tr>")); ph.DataBinding += new EventHandler(ph_DataBinding); break; } case ListItemType.Separator: { InstantiateInSeperator(ph); break; } } } void ph_DataBinding(object sender, EventArgs e) { DataBindingOverride(sender, e); } /// <summary> /// the controls placed into the PlaceHolder will get wrapped in &lt;table&gt;&lt;tr&gt; &lt;/tr&gt;. I.e. you need to provide the column names wrapped in &lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt; tags. /// </summary> /// <param name="header"></param> public abstract void InstantiateInHeader(PlaceHolder ph); /// <summary> /// the controls will have a column added after them and so require each column to be properly wrapped in &lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt; tags. The &lt;tr&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; is handled in the base class. /// </summary> /// <param name="ph"></param> public abstract void InstantiateInItem(PlaceHolder ph); /// <summary> /// the controls will have a column added after them and so require each column to be properly wrapped in &lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt; tags. The &lt;tr&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; is handled in the base class. /// </summary> /// <param name="ph"></param> public abstract void InstantiateInAlternatingItem(PlaceHolder ph); /// <summary> /// the controls will have a column added after them and so require each column to be properly wrapped in &lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt; tags. The &lt;tr&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; is handled in the base class. /// </summary> /// <param name="ph"></param> public abstract void InstantiateInEdit(PlaceHolder ph); /// <summary> /// Any html used in the footer will have &lt;/tr&gt;&lt;table&gt; appended to the end. /// &lt;tr&gt; will be appended to the front. /// </summary> /// <param name="ph"></param> public abstract void InstantiateInFooter(PlaceHolder ph); /// <summary> /// the controls will have a column added after them and so require each column to be properly wrapped in &lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt; tags. The &lt;tr&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; is handled in the base class. /// Adds Delete and Edit Buttons after the table contents. /// </summary> /// <param name="ph"></param> public abstract void InstantiateInSelectedItem(PlaceHolder ph); /// <summary> /// The base class provides no &lt;tr&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; tags /// </summary> /// <param name="ph"></param> public abstract void InstantiateInSeperator(PlaceHolder ph); /// <summary> /// Use this method to bind the controls to their data. /// </summary> /// <param name="sender"></param> /// <param name="e"></param> public abstract void DataBindingOverride(object sender, EventArgs e); #endregion } Inheriting class: public class NominalGroupTemplate : BaseTemplate { public NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType theListItemType) : base(theListItemType) { } public override void InstantiateInHeader(PlaceHolder ph) { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>ID</td><td>Group</td><td>IsPositive</td>")); } public override void InstantiateInItem(PlaceHolder ph) { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>")); Label lblID = new Label(); lblID.ID = "lblID"; ph.Controls.Add(lblID); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td><td>")); Label lblGroup = new Label(); lblGroup.ID = "lblGroup"; ph.Controls.Add(lblGroup); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td><td>")); CheckBox chkIsPositive = new CheckBox(); chkIsPositive.ID = "chkIsPositive"; chkIsPositive.Enabled = false; ph.Controls.Add(chkIsPositive); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td>")); } public override void InstantiateInAlternatingItem(PlaceHolder ph) { InstantiateInItem(ph); } public override void InstantiateInEdit(PlaceHolder ph) { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>")); Label lblID = new Label(); lblID.ID = "lblID"; ph.Controls.Add(lblID); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td><td>")); TextBox txtGroup = new TextBox(); txtGroup.ID = "txtGroup"; txtGroup.Visible = true; txtGroup.Enabled = true ; ph.Controls.Add(txtGroup); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td><td>")); CheckBox chkIsPositive = new CheckBox(); chkIsPositive.ID = "chkIsPositive"; chkIsPositive.Visible = true; chkIsPositive.Enabled = true ; ph.Controls.Add(chkIsPositive); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td>")); } public override void InstantiateInFooter(PlaceHolder ph) { InstantiateInHeader(ph); } public override void InstantiateInSelectedItem(PlaceHolder ph) { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>")); Label lblID = new Label(); lblID.ID = "lblID"; ph.Controls.Add(lblID); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td><td>")); TextBox txtGroup = new TextBox(); txtGroup.ID = "txtGroup"; txtGroup.Visible = true; txtGroup.Enabled = false; ph.Controls.Add(txtGroup); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td><td>")); CheckBox chkIsPositive = new CheckBox(); chkIsPositive.ID = "chkIsPositive"; chkIsPositive.Visible = true; chkIsPositive.Enabled = false; ph.Controls.Add(chkIsPositive); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td>")); } public override void InstantiateInSeperator(PlaceHolder ph) { } public override void DataBindingOverride(object sender, EventArgs e) { PlaceHolder ph = (PlaceHolder)sender; DataListItem li = (DataListItem)ph.NamingContainer; int id = Convert.ToInt32(DataBinder.Eval(li.DataItem, "ID")); string group = (string)DataBinder.Eval(li.DataItem, "Group"); bool isPositive = Convert.ToBoolean(DataBinder.Eval(li.DataItem, "IsPositive")); switch (this.ListItemType) { case ListItemType.Item: case ListItemType.AlternatingItem: { ((Label)ph.FindControl("lblID")).Text = id.ToString(); ((Label)ph.FindControl("lblGroup")).Text = group; ((CheckBox)ph.FindControl("chkIsPositive")).Text = isPositive.ToString(); break; } case ListItemType.EditItem: case ListItemType.SelectedItem: { ((TextBox)ph.FindControl("lblID")).Text = id.ToString(); ((TextBox)ph.FindControl("txtGroup")).Text = group; ((CheckBox)ph.FindControl("chkIsPositive")).Text = isPositive.ToString(); break; } } } } From here I added the control to a page the code behind public partial class NominalGroupbroke : System.Web.UI.UserControl { public void SetNominalGroupList(IList<BONominalGroup> theNominalGroups) { XElement data = Serialiser<BONominalGroup>.SerialiseObjectList(theNominalGroups); ViewState.Add("nominalGroups", data.ToString()); dlNominalGroup.DataSource = theNominalGroups; dlNominalGroup.DataBind(); } protected void Page_init() { dlNominalGroup.HeaderTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Header); dlNominalGroup.ItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Item); dlNominalGroup.AlternatingItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.AlternatingItem); dlNominalGroup.SeparatorTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Separator); dlNominalGroup.SelectedItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.SelectedItem); dlNominalGroup.EditItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.EditItem); dlNominalGroup.FooterTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Footer); } protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { dlNominalGroup.ItemCommand += new DataListCommandEventHandler(dlNominalGroup_ItemCommand); } void dlNominalGroup_Init(object sender, EventArgs e) { dlNominalGroup.HeaderTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Header); dlNominalGroup.ItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Item); dlNominalGroup.AlternatingItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.AlternatingItem); dlNominalGroup.SeparatorTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Separator); dlNominalGroup.SelectedItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.SelectedItem); dlNominalGroup.EditItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.EditItem); dlNominalGroup.FooterTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Footer); } void dlNominalGroup_DataBinding(object sender, EventArgs e) { } void deleteNominalGroup(int index) { XElement data = XElement.Parse(Convert.ToString( ViewState["nominalGroups"] )); IList<BONominalGroup> list = Serialiser<BONominalGroup>.DeserialiseObjectList(data); FENominalGroup.DeleteNominalGroup(list[index].ID); list.RemoveAt(index); data = Serialiser<BONominalGroup>.SerialiseObjectList(list); ViewState["nominalGroups"] = data.ToString(); dlNominalGroup.DataSource = list; dlNominalGroup.DataBind(); } void updateNominalGroup(DataListItem theItem) { XElement data = XElement.Parse(Convert.ToString( ViewState["nominalGroups"])); IList<BONominalGroup> list = Serialiser<BONominalGroup>.DeserialiseObjectList(data); BONominalGroup old = list[theItem.ItemIndex]; BONominalGroup n = new BONominalGroup(); byte id = Convert.ToByte(((TextBox)theItem.FindControl("lblID")).Text); string group = ((TextBox)theItem.FindControl("txtGroup")).Text; bool isPositive = Convert.ToBoolean(((CheckBox)theItem.FindControl("chkIsPositive")).Text); n.ID = id; n.Group = group; n.IsPositive = isPositive; FENominalGroup.UpdateNominalGroup(old, n); list[theItem.ItemIndex] = n; data = Serialiser<BONominalGroup>.SerialiseObjectList(list); ViewState["nominalGroups"] = data.ToString(); } void dlNominalGroup_ItemCommand(object source, DataListCommandEventArgs e) { DataList l = (DataList)source; switch (e.CommandName) { case "SelectRow": { if (l.EditItemIndex == -1) { l.SelectedIndex = e.Item.ItemIndex; l.EditItemIndex = -1; } break; } case "EditRow": { if (l.SelectedIndex == e.Item.ItemIndex) { l.EditItemIndex = e.Item.ItemIndex; } break; } case "DeleteRow": { deleteNominalGroup(e.Item.ItemIndex); l.EditItemIndex = -1; try { l.SelectedIndex = e.Item.ItemIndex; } catch { l.SelectedIndex = -1; } break; } case "CancelRow": { l.SelectedIndex = l.EditItemIndex; l.EditItemIndex = -1; break; } case "SaveRow": { updateNominalGroup(e.Item); try { l.SelectedIndex = e.Item.ItemIndex; } catch { l.SelectedIndex = -1; } l.EditItemIndex = -1; break; } } } Lots of code there, I'm afraid, but it should build. Thanks if anyone manages to spot my silliness. The BONominalGroup class (please ignore my crazy getHash override, I'm not proud of it). IAudit can just be an empty interface here and all will be fine. It used to inherit from another class, I have cleaned that out - so the serialization logic may be broken here. public class BONominalGroup { public BONominalGroup() #region Fields and properties private Int16 _ID; public Int16 ID { get { return _ID; } set { _ID = value; } } private string _group; public string Group { get { return _group; } set { _group = value; } } private bool _isPositve; public bool IsPositive { get { return _isPositve; } set { _isPositve = value; } } #endregion public override bool Equals(object obj) { bool retVal = false; BONominalGroup ng = obj as BONominalGroup; if (ng!=null) if (ng._group == this._group && ng._ID == this.ID && ng.IsPositive == this.IsPositive) { retVal = true; } return retVal; } public override int GetHashCode() { return ToString().GetHashCode(); } public override string ToString() { return "BONominalGroup{ID:" + this.ID.ToString() + ",Group:" + this.Group.ToString() + ",IsPositive:" + this.IsPositive.ToString() + "," + "}"; } #region IXmlSerializable Members public override void ReadXml(XmlReader reader) { reader.ReadStartElement("BONominalGroup"); this.ID = Convert.ToByte(reader.ReadElementString("id")); this.Group = reader.ReadElementString("group"); this.IsPositive = Convert.ToBoolean(reader.ReadElementString("isPositive")); base.ReadXml(reader); reader.ReadEndElement(); } public override void WriteXml(XmlWriter writer) { writer.WriteElementString("id", this.ID.ToString()); writer.WriteElementString("group", this.Group); writer.WriteElementString("isPositive", this.IsPositive.ToString()); // writer.WriteStartElement("BOBase"); // base.WriteXml(writer); writer.WriteEndElement(); } #endregion }

    Read the article

  • Pass a Delphi class to a C++ function/method that expects a class with __thiscall methods.

    - by Alan G.
    I have some MSVC++ compiled DLL's for which I have created COM-like (lite) interfaces (abstract Delphi classes). Some of those classes have methods that need pointers to objects. These C++ methods are declared with the __thiscall calling convention (which I cannot change), which is just like __stdcall, except a this pointer is passed on the ECX register. I create the class instance in Delphi, then pass it on to the C++ method. I can set breakpoints in Delphi and see it hitting the exposed __stdcall methods in my Delphi class, but soon I get a STATUS_STACK_BUFFER_OVERRUN and the app has to exit. Is it possible to emulate/deal with __thiscall on the Delphi side of things? If I pass an object instantiated by the C++ system then all is good, and that object's methods are called (as would be expected), but this is useless - I need to pass Delphi objects. Edit 2010-04-19 18:12 This is what happens in more detail: The first method called (setLabel) exits with no error (though its a stub method). The second method called (init), enters then dies when it attempts to read the vol parameter. C++ Side #define SHAPES_EXPORT __declspec(dllexport) // just to show the value class SHAPES_EXPORT CBox { public: virtual ~CBox() {} virtual void init(double volume) = 0; virtual void grow(double amount) = 0; virtual void shrink(double amount) = 0; virtual void setID(int ID = 0) = 0; virtual void setLabel(const char* text) = 0; }; Delphi Side IBox = class public procedure destroyBox; virtual; stdcall; abstract; procedure init(vol: Double); virtual; stdcall; abstract; procedure grow(amount: Double); virtual; stdcall; abstract; procedure shrink(amount: Double); virtual; stdcall; abstract; procedure setID(val: Integer); virtual; stdcall; abstract; procedure setLabel(text: PChar); virtual; stdcall; abstract; end; TMyBox = class(IBox) protected FVolume: Double; FID: Integer; FLabel: String; // public constructor Create; destructor Destroy; override; // BEGIN Virtual Method implementation procedure destroyBox; override; stdcall; // empty - Dont need/want C++ to manage my Delphi objects, just call their methods procedure init(vol: Double); override; stdcall; // FVolume := vol; procedure grow(amount: Double); override; stdcall; // Inc(FVolume, amount); procedure shrink(amount: Double); override; stdcall; // Dec(FVolume, amount); procedure setID(val: Integer); override; stdcall; // FID := val; procedure setLabel(text: PChar); override; stdcall; // Stub method; empty. // END Virtual Method implementation property Volume: Double read FVolume; property ID: Integer read FID; property Label: String read FLabel; end; I would have half expected using stdcall alone to work, but something is messing up, not sure what, perhaps something to do with the ECX register being used? Help would be greatly appreciated. Edit 2010-04-19 17:42 Could it be that the ECX register needs to be preserved on entry and restored once the function exits? Is the this pointer required by C++? I'm probably just reaching at the moment based on some intense Google searches. I found something related, but it seems to be dealing with the reverse of this issue.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  | Next Page >