Search Results

Search found 1405 results on 57 pages for 'prototype'.

Page 21/57 | < Previous Page | 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  | Next Page >

  • How does this game loop actually work?

    - by Nicolai
    I read this playfulJS post, about ray-casting: http://www.playfuljs.com/a-first-person-engine-in-265-lines/ It looks really interested, so I decided to look at his javascript. I am no expert in javascript, so I quickly got lost. It's the game loop "object" that really gets me. I simply don't understand how it works. From the code: function GameLoop() { this.frame = this.frame.bind(this); this.lastTime = 0; this.callback = function() {}; } GameLoop.prototype.start = function(callback) { this.callback = callback; requestAnimationFrame(this.frame); }; GameLoop.prototype.frame = function(time) { var seconds = (time - this.lastTime) / 1000; this.lastTime = time; if (seconds < 0.2) this.callback(seconds); requestAnimationFrame(this.frame); }; var loop = new GameLoop(); loop.start(function frame(seconds) { map.update(seconds); player.update(controls.states, map, seconds); camera.render(player, map); }); Now, what really confuses me here, is this bind stuff and how this actually loops. I am guessing, that if less than 0.2 seconds have passed, since the last time the loop was run, it simply goes back to re-check the time. If more than 0.2 seconds have passed, it leaves the frame function, and executes the 3 lines in the loop. But, if this is true, then how does the loop.start() get called again? And what on earth is the meaning of this.frame = this.frame.bind(this);? I've looked up prototypes bind() but I really don't understand it.

    Read the article

  • Semantic Form Markup for Yes or No Questions - Or Should I Tell my Designers to Bugger Off?

    - by sholsinger
    I frequently receive mock-ups of HTML forms with the following prototype: Some long winded yes or no question?   (o) Yes   ( ) No The (o) and ( ) in this prototype represent radio buttons. My personal view is that if the question has only a true or false value then it should be a check box. That said, I have seen this sort of "layout" from almost every designer I've ever worked with. If I were not to question their decision, or question the client's decision, I'd probably mark it up like this: <p class="pseudo_label">Some long winded yes or no question?</p> <input type="radio" name="the_question" id="the_question_yes" value="1"> <label for="the_question_yes" class="after_radio">Yes</label> <input type="radio" name="the_question" id="the_question_no" value="0"> <label for="the_question_no" class="after_radio">No</label> I really don't want to do that. I want to push back and convince them that this should really be a check box and not two radio buttons. But my question is, if I can't convince them – you're welcome to help me try – how should I code that original design requirement such that it is semantic and at least understandable for screen reader users? If I were able to convince my tormentors to change their minds, I would likely code it in the following fashion: <label for="the_question">Some long winded yes or no question?</label> <input type="checkbox" name="the_question" id="the_question" value="1"> What do you think about this issue? Should I push back? Possibly more importantly is either way semantically correct?

    Read the article

  • GIS-based data visualization and maintenance tool

    - by Dave Jarvis
    Background Looking to leverage an existing GIS system for exploring organizational data. Architecture The following figure represents a high-level overview of the system's desired features: The most basic usage would be as follows: The user visits a web site. The system presents a map (having regions, cities, and buildings). The user drills-down on the map to a particular building. The system provides a basic CRUD interface. The user can view and modify information about personnel (e.g., their assigned teams), equipment (e.g., network appliances), applications, and the building itself (e.g., contact and phone numbers). Ideally, all the components should be open-source (or otherwise free). Problem This must be a small project that needs a quick (but functional) prototype, mostly to confirm whether or not such a system would be useful in the long term. Questions What software components would you use to quickly develop a working prototype? What open-source solutions already exist, if any? Ideas Here is what I am thinking: PostGIS - Define the regions, cities, and sites Google Maps - Display an interactive, clickable map geoJSON - Protocol between PostGIS and Google Maps Seam - CRUD interface Custom Development For example, this would entail: Installation and configuration Configure SSH for remote logins Subversion (or git) PostgreSQL PostGIS Java Tomcat Seam JasperReports Enter GIS information into PostGIS Aggregate data sources into PostgreSQL database Develop starting page for map interface Develop clickable Google Maps interface Develop summary reports Develop CRUD interface using Seam for data maintenance Surely something like this already exists? Thank you!

    Read the article

  • How common is prototyping as the first stage of development?

    - by EpsilonVector
    I've been taking some software design courses in the past few semesters, and while I see the benefit in a lot of the formalism, I feel like it doesn't tell me anything about the program itself: You can't tell how the program is going to operate from the Use Case spec, even though it discusses what the program can do. You can't tell anything about the user experience from the requirements document, even though it can include quality requirements. Sequence diagrams are a good description of how the software works as the call stack, but are very limited, and give a highly partial view of the overall system. Class diagrams are great for describing how the system is built, but are utterly useless in helping you figure out what the software needs to be. Where in all this formalism is the bottom line: how the program looks, operates, and what experience it gives? Doesn't it make more sense to design off of that? Isn't it better to figure out how the program should work via a prototype and strive to implement it for real? I know that I'm probably suffering from being taught engineering by theoreticians, but I need to ask, do they do this in the industry? How do people figure out what the program actually is, not what it should conform to? Do people prototype a lot, or do they mostly use the formal tools like UML and I just didn't get the hang of using them yet?

    Read the article

  • Semantic Form Markup for Yes or No Questions

    - by sholsinger
    I frequently receive mock-ups of HTML forms with the following prototype: Some long winded yes or no question?   (o) Yes   ( ) No The (o) and ( ) in this prototype represent radio buttons. My personal view is that if the question has only a true or false value then it should be a check box. That said, I have seen this sort of "layout" from almost every designer I've ever worked with. If I were not to question their decision, or question the client's decision, I'd probably mark it up like this: <p class="pseudo_label">Some long winded yes or no question?</p> <input type="radio" name="the_question" id="the_question_yes" value="1"> <label for="the_question_yes" class="after_radio">Yes</label> <input type="radio" name="the_question" id="the_question_no" value="0"> <label for="the_question_no" class="after_radio">No</label> I really don't want to do that. I want to push back and convince them that this should really be a check box and not two radio buttons. But my question is, if I can't convince them – you're welcome to help me try – how should I code that original design requirement such that it is semantic and at least understandable for screen reader users? If I were able to convince my tormentors to change their minds, I would likely code it in the following fashion: <label for="the_question">Some long winded yes or no question?</label> <input type="checkbox" name="the_question" id="the_question" value="1"> What do you think about this issue? Should I push back? Possibly more importantly is either way semantically correct? UPDATE: I have posted a related question on the UI SE per your suggestions. You can find it here: http://ui.stackexchange.com/q/3335/3493

    Read the article

  • How common is prototyping as the first stage of development?

    - by EpsilonVector
    I've been taking some software design courses in the past few semesters, and while I see the benefit in a lot of the formalism, I still feel like it doesn't tell me anything about the program itself. You can't tell how the program is going to operate from the Use Case spec, even though it discusses what the program can do, and you can't tell anything about the user experience from the requirements document, even though it can include QA requirements. ...sequence diagrams are as good a description of how the software works as the call stack, in other words- very limited, highly partial view of the overall system, and a class diagram is great for describing how the system is built, but is utterly useless in helping you figure out what the software needs to be. Where in all this formalism is the bottom line- how the program looks, operates, and what experience it gives? Doesn't it make more sense to design off of that? Isn't it better to figure out how the program should work via a prototype and strive to implement it for real? I know that I'm probably suffering from being taught engineering by theoreticians, but I got to ask, do they do this in the industry? How do people figure out what the program actually is, not what it should conform to? Do people prototype a lot? ...or do they mostly use the formal tools like UML and I just didn't get the hang of using them yet?

    Read the article

  • Quantifying the value of refactoring in commercial terms

    - by Myles McDonnell
    Here is the classic scenario; Dev team build a prototype. Business mgmt like it and put it into production. Dev team now have to continue to deliver new features whilst at the same time pay the technical debt accrued when the code base was a prototype. My question is this (forgive me, it's rather open ended); how can the value of the refactoring work be quantified in commercial terms? As developers we can clearly understand and communicate the value in technical terms, such a the removal of code duplication, the simplification of an object model and so on. But this means little to an executive focussed on the commercial elements. What will mean something to this executive is the dev. team being able to deliver requirements at faster velocity. Just making this statement without any metrics that clearly quantify return on investment (increased velocity in return for resource allocated to refactoring) carries little weight. I'm interested to hear from anyone who has had experience, positive or negative, in relation to the above. ----------------- EDIT ---------------- Thanks for the responses so far, all of which I think are good. What I want to develop is a metric that proves (or disproves!) all of these statements. A report that ties velocity to refactoring and shows a positive effect.

    Read the article

  • Confused about javascript module pattern implementation

    - by Damon
    I have a class written on a project I'm working on that I've been told is using the module pattern, but it's doing things a little differently than the examples I've seen. It basically takes this form: (function ($, document, window, undefined) { var module = { foo : bar, aMethod : function (arg) { className.bMethod(arg); }, bMethod : function (arg) { console.log('spoons'); } }; window.ajaxTable = ajaxTable; })(jQuery, document, window); I get what's going on here. But I'm not sure how this relates to most of the definitions I've seen of the module (or revealing?) module pattern. like this one from briancray var module = (function () { // private variables and functions var foo = 'bar'; // constructor var module = function () { }; // prototype module.prototype = { constructor: module, something: function () { } }; // return module return module; })(); var my_module = new module(); Is the first example basically like the second except everything is in the constructor? I'm just wrapping my head around patterns and the little things at the beginnings and endings always make me not sure what I should be doing.

    Read the article

  • How bad would be to focus on iOS/Android development for an indie developer?

    - by kender
    After some time developing games for others I'm thinking of moving towards my own productions. My background is 10+ years of software development, with last 2 years spent on the iOS development (Objective-C and CoronaSDK). With my current experience in Corona I can quickly develop for iOS and Android systems. And this is something that I'm probably gonna do with several of the game ideas I have, at least for the prototype part. But - I'm wondering if it's not a bad idea to focus on those 2 systems only. After all there are other mobile platforms, there are PCs, Macs and Linux boxes... All of them having gamers using them. I was wondering if it wasn't a good idea to try some other SDK, giving me more flexibility when it comes to platform-independance. There's Unity3D (I think I can develop a 2D game in it though), there's MoAI from what I checked. I see a few options, not sure which one is best as I have little experience in this field (publishing own games): Stick with CoronaSDK for the whole time, release for iOS and Android platforms, screw other mobile devices and PCs, Use Corona for prototyping, then when the idea goes more into the "production" phase rewrite it in MoAI or Unity3D for more platforms support, Start with one of those 2 SDKs right now (which means the prototype phase will be delayed a bit, but after that I can jump right into real coding). Any clues here, what to do?

    Read the article

  • Project Jigsaw: Late for the train: The Q&A

    - by Mark Reinhold
    I recently proposed, to the Java community in general and to the SE 8 (JSR 337) Expert Group in particular, to defer Project Jigsaw from Java 8 to Java 9. I also proposed to aim explicitly for a regular two-year release cycle going forward. Herewith a summary of the key questions I’ve seen in reaction to these proposals, along with answers. Making the decision Q Has the Java SE 8 Expert Group decided whether to defer the addition of a module system and the modularization of the Platform to Java SE 9? A No, it has not yet decided. Q By when do you expect the EG to make this decision? A In the next month or so. Q How can I make sure my voice is heard? A The EG will consider all relevant input from the wider community. If you have a prominent blog, column, or other communication channel then there’s a good chance that we’ve already seen your opinion. If not, you’re welcome to send it to the Java SE 8 Comments List, which is the EG’s official feedback channel. Q What’s the overall tone of the feedback you’ve received? A The feedback has been about evenly divided as to whether Java 8 should be delayed for Jigsaw, Jigsaw should be deferred to Java 9, or some other, usually less-realistic, option should be taken. Project Jigsaw Q Why is Project Jigsaw taking so long? A Project Jigsaw started at Sun, way back in August 2008. Like many efforts during the final years of Sun, it was not well staffed. Jigsaw initially ran on a shoestring, with just a handful of mostly part-time engineers, so progress was slow. During the integration of Sun into Oracle all work on Jigsaw was halted for a time, but it was eventually resumed after a thorough consideration of the alternatives. Project Jigsaw was really only fully staffed about a year ago, around the time that Java 7 shipped. We’ve added a few more engineers to the team since then, but that can’t make up for the inadequate initial staffing and the time lost during the transition. Q So it’s really just a matter of staffing limitations and corporate-integration distractions? A Aside from these difficulties, the other main factor in the duration of the project is the sheer technical difficulty of modularizing the JDK. Q Why is modularizing the JDK so hard? A There are two main reasons. The first is that the JDK code base is deeply interconnected at both the API and the implementation levels, having been built over many years primarily in the style of a monolithic software system. We’ve spent considerable effort eliminating or at least simplifying as many API and implementation dependences as possible, so that both the Platform and its implementations can be presented as a coherent set of interdependent modules, but some particularly thorny cases remain. Q What’s the second reason? A We want to maintain as much compatibility with prior releases as possible, most especially for existing classpath-based applications but also, to the extent feasible, for applications composed of modules. Q Is modularizing the JDK even necessary? Can’t you just put it in one big module? A Modularizing the JDK, and more specifically modularizing the Java SE Platform, will enable standard yet flexible Java runtime configurations scaling from large servers down to small embedded devices. In the long term it will enable the convergence of Java SE with the higher-end Java ME Platforms. Q Is Project Jigsaw just about modularizing the JDK? A As originally conceived, Project Jigsaw was indeed focused primarily upon modularizing the JDK. The growing demand for a truly standard module system for the Java Platform, which could be used not just for the Platform itself but also for libraries and applications built on top of it, later motivated expanding the scope of the effort. Q As a developer, why should I care about Project Jigsaw? A The introduction of a modular Java Platform will, in the long term, fundamentally change the way that Java implementations, libraries, frameworks, tools, and applications are designed, built, and deployed. Q How much progress has Project Jigsaw made? A We’ve actually made a lot of progress. Much of the core functionality of the module system has been prototyped and works at both compile time and run time. We’ve extended the Java programming language with module declarations, worked out a structure for modular source trees and corresponding compiled-class trees, and implemented these features in javac. We’ve defined an efficient module-file format, extended the JVM to bootstrap a modular JRE, and designed and implemented a preliminary API. We’ve used the module system to make a good first cut at dividing the JDK and the Java SE API into a coherent set of modules. Among other things, we’re currently working to retrofit the java.util.ServiceLoader API to support modular services. Q I want to help! How can I get involved? A Check out the project page, read the draft requirements and design overview documents, download the latest prototype build, and play with it. You can tell us what you think, and follow the rest of our work in real time, on the jigsaw-dev list. The Java Platform Module System JSR Q What’s the relationship between Project Jigsaw and the eventual Java Platform Module System JSR? A At a high level, Project Jigsaw has two phases. In the first phase we’re exploring an approach to modularity that’s markedly different from that of existing Java modularity solutions. We’ve assumed that we can change the Java programming language, the virtual machine, and the APIs. Doing so enables a design which can strongly enforce module boundaries in all program phases, from compilation to deployment to execution. That, in turn, leads to better usability, diagnosability, security, and performance. The ultimate goal of the first phase is produce a working prototype which can inform the work of the Module-System JSR EG. Q What will happen in the second phase of Project Jigsaw? A The second phase will produce the reference implementation of the specification created by the Module-System JSR EG. The EG might ultimately choose an entirely different approach than the one we’re exploring now. If and when that happens then Project Jigsaw will change course as necessary, but either way I think that the end result will be better for having been informed by our current work. Maven & OSGi Q Why not just use Maven? A Maven is a software project management and comprehension tool. As such it can be seen as a kind of build-time module system but, by its nature, it does nothing to support modularity at run time. Q Why not just adopt OSGi? A OSGi is a rich dynamic component system which includes not just a module system but also a life-cycle model and a dynamic service registry. The latter two facilities are useful to some kinds of sophisticated applications, but I don’t think they’re of wide enough interest to be standardized as part of the Java SE Platform. Q Okay, then why not just adopt the module layer of OSGi? A The OSGi module layer is not operative at compile time; it only addresses modularity during packaging, deployment, and execution. As it stands, moreover, it’s useful for library and application modules but, since it’s built strictly on top of the Java SE Platform, it can’t be used to modularize the Platform itself. Q If Maven addresses modularity at build time, and the OSGi module layer addresses modularity during deployment and at run time, then why not just use the two together, as many developers already do? A The combination of Maven and OSGi is certainly very useful in practice today. These systems have, however, been built on top of the existing Java platform; they have not been able to change the platform itself. This means, among other things, that module boundaries are weakly enforced, if at all, which makes it difficult to diagnose configuration errors and impossible to run untrusted code securely. The prototype Jigsaw module system, by contrast, aims to define a platform-level solution which extends both the language and the JVM in order to enforce module boundaries strongly and uniformly in all program phases. Q If the EG chooses an approach like the one currently being taken in the Jigsaw prototype, will Maven and OSGi be made obsolete? A No, not at all! No matter what approach is taken, to ensure wide adoption it’s essential that the standard Java Platform Module System interact well with Maven. Applications that depend upon the sophisticated features of OSGi will no doubt continue to use OSGi, so it’s critical that implementations of OSGi be able to run on top of the Java module system and, if suitably modified, support OSGi bundles that depend upon Java modules. Ideas for how to do that are currently being explored in Project Penrose. Java 8 & Java 9 Q Without Jigsaw, won’t Java 8 be a pretty boring release? A No, far from it! It’s still slated to include the widely-anticipated Project Lambda (JSR 335), work on which has been going very well, along with the new Date/Time API (JSR 310), Type Annotations (JSR 308), and a set of smaller features already in progress. Q Won’t deferring Jigsaw to Java 9 delay the eventual convergence of the higher-end Java ME Platforms with Java SE? A It will slow that transition, but it will not stop it. To allow progress toward that convergence to be made with Java 8 I’ve suggested to the Java SE 8 EG that we consider specifying a small number of Profiles which would allow compact configurations of the SE Platform to be built and deployed. Q If Jigsaw is deferred to Java 9, would the Oracle engineers currently working on it be reassigned to other Java 8 features and then return to working on Jigsaw again after Java 8 ships? A No, these engineers would continue to work primarily on Jigsaw from now until Java 9 ships. Q Why not drop Lambda and finish Jigsaw instead? A Even if the engineers currently working on Lambda could instantly switch over to Jigsaw and immediately become productive—which of course they can’t—there are less than nine months remaining in the Java 8 schedule for work on major features. That’s just not enough time for the broad review, testing, and feedback which such a fundamental change to the Java Platform requires. Q Why not ship the module system in Java 8, and then modularize the platform in Java 9? A If we deliver a module system in one release but don’t use it to modularize the JDK until some later release then we run a big risk of getting something fundamentally wrong. If that happens then we’d have to fix it in the later release, and fixing fundamental design flaws after the fact almost always leads to a poor end result. Q Why not ship Jigsaw in an 8.5 release, less than two years after 8? Or why not just ship a new release every year, rather than every other year? A Many more developers work on the JDK today than a couple of years ago, both because Oracle has dramatically increased its own investment and because other organizations and individuals have joined the OpenJDK Community. Collectively we don’t, however, have the bandwidth required to ship and then provide long-term support for a big JDK release more frequently than about every other year. Q What’s the feedback been on the two-year release-cycle proposal? A For just about every comment that we should release more frequently, so that new features are available sooner, there’s been another asking for an even slower release cycle so that large teams of enterprise developers who ship mission-critical applications have a chance to migrate at a comfortable pace.

    Read the article

  • Models, collections...and then what? Processes?

    - by Dan
    I'm a LAMP-stack dev who's been more on the JavaScript side the last few years and really enjoying the Model + Collection approach to data entities that BackboneJS, etc. uses. It's helped me organize my code in such a way that it is extremely portable, keeping all my properties and methods in the scope (model, collection, etc.) in which they apply. One thing that keeps bugging me though is how to organize the next level up, the 'process layer' as you might call it, that can potentially operate on instances of either models or collections or whatever else. Where should methods like find() (which returns a collection) and create() (which returns a model) reside? I know some people would put a create() in the Collection prototype, but while a collection operates on models I don't think it's exactly right to create them. And while a find() would return a collection I don't think it correct to have that action within the collection prototype itself (it should be a layer up). Can anyone offer some examples of any patterns that employ some kind of OOP-friendly 'process' layer? I'm sorry if this is a fairly well-known discussion but I'm afraid I can't seem to find the terminology to search for.

    Read the article

  • Should I be looking for developers with specific skill sets or generalists that need to learn?

    - by Lostsoul
    Thanks to the great help of this site and SO, I've been able to make a prototype of a software I want to sell but unfortunately although the prototype works I think my code quality is very low. I didn't use much OOP or design patterns so although my code is understandable to me, I think a normal developer would faint if they had to read it. So I wanted to hire a developer to make it a bit more better quality and improve some of my implementations of API's that I may have not done correctly. I'm having problems hiring a developer though. I have met 2 developers and had them read my software specs.The problem is, they lacked my business's domain knowledge(which is completely understandable and no biggie) but they also lacked knowledge of the underlying tech systems I used such as Hadoop, Hbase, Cuda, etc..I spent alot of time explaining map/reduce, bigtables and other technologies I used. I thought it was common knowledge because of my interactions with people on this site but the people I met with mentioned they never had to deal with these things so they didn't know it. My question is, for software projects that are hiring contractor developers is it a danger if the developer does not have experience with the underlying technologies? or can a general developer who is accomplished in another area realistically pick up new technologies? I did a very very quick back of envelope calculation and I think the upfront costs would be similar if I hire a student or developer with no experience in my technologies who will work many hours versus hiring a highly experienced developer who charges double but finishes in half the time but what other risks should I be considering or worried about? Also, should if I do hire a generalist, should I be paying for the time it takes them to learn hadoop or cuda if they are contractors(seems to make business sense but not sure how fair it is to them if they do not use the skill again). I'm a bit confused so any suggestions would be great.

    Read the article

  • how to generate tinymce to ajax generated textarea

    - by Jai_pans
    Hi, i have a image multi-uloader script which also each item uploaded was preview 1st b4 it submitted and each images has its following textarea which are also generated by javascript and my problem is i want to use the tinymce editor to each textarea generated by the ajax. Any help will be appreciated.. here is my script function fileQueueError(file, errorCode, message) { try { var imageName = "error.gif"; var errorName = ""; if (errorCode === SWFUpload.errorCode_QUEUE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED) { errorName = "You have attempted to queue too many files."; } if (errorName !== "") { alert(errorName); return; } switch (errorCode) { case SWFUpload.QUEUE_ERROR.ZERO_BYTE_FILE: imageName = "zerobyte.gif"; break; case SWFUpload.QUEUE_ERROR.FILE_EXCEEDS_SIZE_LIMIT: imageName = "toobig.gif"; break; case SWFUpload.QUEUE_ERROR.ZERO_BYTE_FILE: case SWFUpload.QUEUE_ERROR.INVALID_FILETYPE: default: alert(message); break; } addImage("images/" + imageName); } catch (ex) { this.debug(ex); } } function fileDialogComplete(numFilesSelected, numFilesQueued) { try { if (numFilesQueued 0) { this.startUpload(); } } catch (ex) { this.debug(ex); } } function uploadProgress(file, bytesLoaded) { try { var percent = Math.ceil((bytesLoaded / file.size) * 100); var progress = new FileProgress(file, this.customSettings.upload_target); progress.setProgress(percent); if (percent === 100) { progress.setStatus("Creating thumbnail..."); progress.toggleCancel(false, this); } else { progress.setStatus("Uploading..."); progress.toggleCancel(true, this); } } catch (ex) { this.debug(ex); } } function uploadSuccess(file, serverData) { try { var progress = new FileProgress(file, this.customSettings.upload_target); if (serverData.substring(0, 7) === "FILEID:") { addRow("tableID","thumbnail.php?id=" + serverData.substring(7),file.name); //setup(); //generateTinyMCE('itemdescription[]'); progress.setStatus("Thumbnail Created."); progress.toggleCancel(false); } else { addImage("images/error.gif"); progress.setStatus("Error."); progress.toggleCancel(false); alert(serverData); } } catch (ex) { this.debug(ex); } } function uploadComplete(file) { try { /* I want the next upload to continue automatically so I'll call startUpload here */ if (this.getStats().files_queued 0) { this.startUpload(); } else { var progress = new FileProgress(file, this.customSettings.upload_target); progress.setComplete(); progress.setStatus("All images received."); progress.toggleCancel(false); } } catch (ex) { this.debug(ex); } } function uploadError(file, errorCode, message) { var imageName = "error.gif"; var progress; try { switch (errorCode) { case SWFUpload.UPLOAD_ERROR.FILE_CANCELLED: try { progress = new FileProgress(file, this.customSettings.upload_target); progress.setCancelled(); progress.setStatus("Cancelled"); progress.toggleCancel(false); } catch (ex1) { this.debug(ex1); } break; case SWFUpload.UPLOAD_ERROR.UPLOAD_STOPPED: try { progress = new FileProgress(file, this.customSettings.upload_target); progress.setCancelled(); progress.setStatus("Stopped"); progress.toggleCancel(true); } catch (ex2) { this.debug(ex2); } case SWFUpload.UPLOAD_ERROR.UPLOAD_LIMIT_EXCEEDED: imageName = "uploadlimit.gif"; break; default: alert(message); break; } addImage("images/" + imageName); } catch (ex3) { this.debug(ex3); } } function addRow(tableID,src,filename) { var table = document.getElementById(tableID); var rowCount = table.rows.length; var row = table.insertRow(rowCount); rowCount + 1; row.id = "row"+rowCount; var cell0 = row.insertCell(0); cell0.innerHTML = rowCount; cell0.style.background = "#FFFFFF"; var cell1 = row.insertCell(1); cell1.align = "center"; cell1.style.background = "#FFFFFF"; var imahe = document.createElement("img"); imahe.setAttribute("src",src); var hidden = document.createElement("input"); hidden.setAttribute("type","hidden"); hidden.setAttribute("name","filename[]"); hidden.setAttribute("value",filename); /*var hidden2 = document.createElement("input"); hidden2.setAttribute("type","hidden"); hidden2.setAttribute("name","filename[]"); hidden2.setAttribute("value",filename); cell1.appendChild(hidden2);*/ cell1.appendChild(hidden); cell1.appendChild(imahe); var cell2 = row.insertCell(2); cell2.align = "left"; cell2.valign = "top"; cell2.style.background = "#FFFFFF"; //tr1.appendChild(td1); var div2 = document.createElement("div"); div2.style.padding ="0 0 0 10px"; div2.style.width = "400px"; var alink = document.createElement("a"); //alink.style.margin="40px 0 0 0"; alink.href ="#"; alink.innerHTML ="Cancel"; alink.onclick= function () { document.getElementById(row.id).style.display='none'; document.getElementById(textfield.id).disabled='disabled'; }; var div = document.createElement("div"); div.style.margin="10px 0"; div.appendChild(alink); var textfield = document.createElement("input"); textfield.id = "file"+rowCount; textfield.type = "text"; textfield.name = "itemname[]"; textfield.style.margin = "10px 0"; textfield.style.width = "400px"; textfield.value = "Item Name"; textfield.onclick= function(){ //textfield.value=""; if(textfield.value=="Item Name") textfield.value=""; if(desc.innerHTML=="") desc.innerHTML ="Item Description"; if(price.value=="") price.value="Item Price"; } var desc = document.createElement("textarea"); desc.name = "itemdescription[]"; desc.cols = "80"; desc.rows = "4"; desc.innerHTML = "Item Description"; desc.onclick = function(){ if(desc.innerHTML== "Item Description") desc.innerHTML = ""; if(textfield.value=="Item name" || textfield.value=="") textfield.value="Item Name"; if(price.value=="") price.value="Item Price"; } var price = document.createElement("input"); price.id = "file"+rowCount; price.type = "text"; price.name = "itemprice[]"; price.style.margin = "10px 0"; price.style.width = "400px"; price.value = "Item Price"; price.onclick= function(){ if(price.value=="Item Price") price.value=""; if(desc.innerHTML=="") desc.innerHTML ="Item Description"; if(textfield.value=="") textfield.value="Item Name"; } var span = document.createElement("span"); span.innerHTML = "View"; span.style.width = "auto"; span.style.padding = "10px 0"; var view = document.createElement("input"); view.id = "file"+rowCount; view.type = "checkbox"; view.name = "publicview[]"; view.value = "y"; view.checked = "checked"; var div3 = document.createElement("div"); div3.appendChild(span); div3.appendChild(view); var div4 = document.createElement("div"); div4.style.padding = "10px 0"; var span2 = document.createElement("span"); span2.innerHTML = "Default Display"; span2.style.width = "auto"; span2.style.padding = "10px 0"; var radio = document.createElement("input"); radio.type = "radio"; radio.name = "setdefault"; radio.value = "y"; div4.appendChild(span2); div4.appendChild(radio); div2.appendChild(div); //div2.appendChild(label); //div2.appendChild(table); div2.appendChild(textfield); div2.appendChild(desc); div2.appendChild(price); div2.appendChild(div3); div2.appendChild(div4); cell2.appendChild(div2); } function addImage(src,val_id) { var newImg = document.createElement("img"); newImg.style.margin = "5px 50px 5px 5px"; newImg.style.display= "inline"; newImg.id=val_id; document.getElementById("thumbnails").appendChild(newImg); if (newImg.filters) { try { newImg.filters.item("DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha").opacity = 0; } catch (e) { // If it is not set initially, the browser will throw an error. This will set it if it is not set yet. newImg.style.filter = 'progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha(opacity=' + 0 + ')'; } } else { newImg.style.opacity = 0; } newImg.onload = function () { fadeIn(newImg, 0); }; newImg.src = src; } function fadeIn(element, opacity) { var reduceOpacityBy = 5; var rate = 30; // 15 fps if (opacity < 100) { opacity += reduceOpacityBy; if (opacity > 100) { opacity = 100; } if (element.filters) { try { element.filters.item("DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha").opacity = opacity; } catch (e) { // If it is not set initially, the browser will throw an error. This will set it if it is not set yet. element.style.filter = 'progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha(opacity=' + opacity + ')'; } } else { element.style.opacity = opacity / 100; } } if (opacity < 100) { setTimeout(function () { fadeIn(element, opacity); }, rate); } } /* ************************************** * FileProgress Object * Control object for displaying file info * ************************************** */ function FileProgress(file, targetID) { this.fileProgressID = "divFileProgress"; this.fileProgressWrapper = document.getElementById(this.fileProgressID); if (!this.fileProgressWrapper) { this.fileProgressWrapper = document.createElement("div"); this.fileProgressWrapper.className = "progressWrapper"; this.fileProgressWrapper.id = this.fileProgressID; this.fileProgressElement = document.createElement("div"); this.fileProgressElement.className = "progressContainer"; var progressCancel = document.createElement("a"); progressCancel.className = "progressCancel"; progressCancel.href = "#"; progressCancel.style.visibility = "hidden"; progressCancel.appendChild(document.createTextNode(" ")); var progressText = document.createElement("div"); progressText.className = "progressName"; progressText.appendChild(document.createTextNode(file.name)); var progressBar = document.createElement("div"); progressBar.className = "progressBarInProgress"; var progressStatus = document.createElement("div"); progressStatus.className = "progressBarStatus"; progressStatus.innerHTML = "&nbsp;"; this.fileProgressElement.appendChild(progressCancel); this.fileProgressElement.appendChild(progressText); this.fileProgressElement.appendChild(progressStatus); this.fileProgressElement.appendChild(progressBar); this.fileProgressWrapper.appendChild(this.fileProgressElement); document.getElementById(targetID).appendChild(this.fileProgressWrapper); fadeIn(this.fileProgressWrapper, 0); } else { this.fileProgressElement = this.fileProgressWrapper.firstChild; this.fileProgressElement.childNodes[1].firstChild.nodeValue = file.name; } this.height = this.fileProgressWrapper.offsetHeight; } FileProgress.prototype.setProgress = function (percentage) { this.fileProgressElement.className = "progressContainer green"; this.fileProgressElement.childNodes[3].className = "progressBarInProgress"; this.fileProgressElement.childNodes[3].style.width = percentage + "%"; }; FileProgress.prototype.setComplete = function () { this.fileProgressElement.className = "progressContainer blue"; this.fileProgressElement.childNodes[3].className = "progressBarComplete"; this.fileProgressElement.childNodes[3].style.width = ""; }; FileProgress.prototype.setError = function () { this.fileProgressElement.className = "progressContainer red"; this.fileProgressElement.childNodes[3].className = "progressBarError"; this.fileProgressElement.childNodes[3].style.width = ""; }; FileProgress.prototype.setCancelled = function () { this.fileProgressElement.className = "progressContainer"; this.fileProgressElement.childNodes[3].className = "progressBarError"; this.fileProgressElement.childNodes[3].style.width = ""; }; FileProgress.prototype.setStatus = function (status) { this.fileProgressElement.childNodes[2].innerHTML = status; }; FileProgress.prototype.toggleCancel = function (show, swfuploadInstance) { this.fileProgressElement.childNodes[0].style.visibility = show ? "visible" : "hidden"; if (swfuploadInstance) { var fileID = this.fileProgressID; this.fileProgressElement.childNodes[0].onclick = function () { swfuploadInstance.cancelUpload(fileID); return false; }; } }; i am using a swfuploader an i jst added a input fields and a textarea when it preview the images which ready to be uploaded and from my html i have this script var swfu; window.onload = function () { swfu = new SWFUpload({ // Backend Settings upload_url: "../we_modules/upload.php", // Relative to the SWF file or absolute post_params: {"PHPSESSID": ""}, // File Upload Settings file_size_limit : "20 MB", // 2MB file_types : "*.*", //file_types : "", file_types_description : "jpg", file_upload_limit : "0", file_queue_limit : "0", // Event Handler Settings - these functions as defined in Handlers.js // The handlers are not part of SWFUpload but are part of my website and control how // my website reacts to the SWFUpload events. //file_queued_handler : fileQueued, file_queue_error_handler : fileQueueError, file_dialog_complete_handler : fileDialogComplete, upload_progress_handler : uploadProgress, upload_error_handler : uploadError, upload_success_handler : uploadSuccess, upload_complete_handler : uploadComplete, // Button Settings button_image_url : "../we_modules/images/SmallSpyGlassWithTransperancy_17x18.png", // Relative to the SWF file button_placeholder_id : "spanButtonPlaceholder", button_width: 180, button_height: 18, button_text : 'Select Files(2 MB Max)', button_text_style : '.button { font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;cursor:pointer } .buttonSmall { font-size: 10pt; }', button_text_top_padding: 0, button_text_left_padding: 18, button_window_mode: SWFUpload.WINDOW_MODE.TRANSPARENT, button_cursor: SWFUpload.CURSOR.HAND, // Flash Settings flash_url : "../swfupload/swfupload.swf", custom_settings : { upload_target : "divFileProgressContainer" }, // Debug Settings debug: false }); }; where should i put on the tinymce function as you mention below?

    Read the article

  • Review of Samsung Focus Windows Phone 7

    - by mbcrump
    I recently acquired a Samsung Focus Windows Phone 7 device from AT&T and wanted to share what I thought of it as an end-user. Before I get started, here are several of my write-ups for the Windows Phone 7. You may want to check out the second article titled: Hands-on WP7 Review of Prototype Hardware. From start to finish with the final version of Visual Studio Tools for Windows Phone 7 Hands-on : Windows Phone 7 Review on Prototype Hardware. Deploying your Windows Phone 7 Application to the actual hardware. Profile your Windows Phone 7 Application for Free Submitting a Windows Phone 7 Application to the Market. Samsung Focus i917 Phone Size: Perfect! I have been carrying around a Dell Streak (Android) and it is about half the size. It is really nice to have a phone that fits in your pocket without a lot of extra bulk. I bought a case for the Focus and it is still a perfect size.  The phone just feels right. Screen: It has a beautiful Super AMOLED 480x800 screen. I only wish it supported a higher resolution. The colors are beautiful especially in an Xbox Live Game.   3G: I use AT&T and I've had spotty reception. This really can't be blamed on the phone as much as the actual carrier. Battery: I've had excellent battery life compared to my iPhone and Android devices. I usually use my phone throughout the day on and off and still have a charge at the end of the day.  Camera/Video: I'm still looking for the option to send the video to YouTube or the Image to Twitter. The images look good, but the phone needs a forward facing camera. I like the iPhone/Android (Dell Streak) camera better. Built-in Speaker: Sounds great. It’s not a wimpy speaker that you cannot hear.  CPU: Very smooth transitioning from one screen to another. The prototype Windows Phone 7 that I had, was no where near as smooth. (It was also running a slower processor though). OS: I actually like the OS but a few things could be better. CONS: Copy and Paste (Supposed to come in the next update) We need more apps (Pandora missing was a big one for me and Slacker’s advertisement sucks!). As time passes, and more developers get on board then this will be fixed. The browser needs some major work. I have tried to make cross-platform (WP7, Android, iPhone and iPad) web apps and the browser that ships with WP7 just can’t handle it.  Apps need to be organized better. Instead of throw them all on one screen, it would help to allow the user to create categories. PROS: Hands down the best gaming experience on a phone. I have all three major phones (iphone, android and wp7). Nothing compares to the gaming experience on the WP7. The phone just works. I’ve had a LOT of glitches with my Android device. I’ve had maybe 2 with my WP7 device. Exchange and Office support are great. Nice integration with Twitter/Facebook and social media. Easy to navigate and find the information you need on one screen. Let’s look at a few pictures and we will wrap up with my final thoughts on the phone. WP7 Home Screen. Back of the phone is as stylish. It is hard to see due to the shadow but it is a very thin phone. What’s included? Manuals Ear buds Data Cable plus Power Adapter Phone Click a picture to enlarge So, what are my final thoughts on the Phone/OS? I love the Samsung Focus and would recommend it to anyone looking for a WP7 device. Like any first generation product, you need to give it a little while to mature. Right now the phone is missing several features that we are all used to using. That doesn’t mean a year from now it will be in the same situation. (I sure hope we won’t). If you are looking to get into mobile development, I believe WP7 is the easiest platform to develop from. This is especially true if you have a background in Silverlight or WPF.    Subscribe to my feed

    Read the article

  • Entity Framework 4 POCO entities in separate assembly, Dynamic Data Website?

    - by steve.macdonald
    Basically I want to use a dynamic data website to maintain data in an EF4 model where the entities are in their own assembly. Model and context are in another assembly. I tried this http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2282916/entity-framework-4-self-tracking-entities-asp-net-dynamic-data-error but get an "ambiguous match" error from reflection: System.Reflection.AmbiguousMatchException was unhandled by user code Message=Ambiguous match found. Source=mscorlib StackTrace: at System.RuntimeType.GetPropertyImpl(String name, BindingFlags bindingAttr, Binder binder, Type returnType, Type[] types, ParameterModifier[] modifiers) at System.Type.GetProperty(String name) at System.Web.DynamicData.ModelProviders.EFTableProvider..ctor(EFDataModelProvider dataModel, EntitySet entitySet, EntityType entityType, Type entityClrType, Type parentEntityClrType, Type rootEntityClrType, String name) at System.Web.DynamicData.ModelProviders.EFDataModelProvider.CreateTableProvider(EntitySet entitySet, EntityType entityType) at System.Web.DynamicData.ModelProviders.EFDataModelProvider..ctor(Object contextInstance, Func1 contextFactory) at System.Web.DynamicData.ModelProviders.SchemaCreator.CreateDataModel(Object contextInstance, Func1 contextFactory) at System.Web.DynamicData.MetaModel.RegisterContext(Func`1 contextFactory, ContextConfiguration configuration) at WebApplication1.Global.RegisterRoutes(RouteCollection routes) in C:\dev\Puffin\Puffin.Prototype.Web\Global.asax.cs:line 42 at WebApplication1.Global.Application_Start(Object sender, EventArgs e) in C:\dev\Puffin\Puffin.Prototype.Web\Global.asax.cs:line 78 InnerException:

    Read the article

  • infoWindow on MarkerClusterer in google maps

    - by vishwanath
    I need infoWindow to be opened instead of zooming in map, when clicking on the ClusterMarker. I am using Gmaps util library MarkerClusterer for creating cluster of markers. I tried changing following line in markerclusterer.js ClusterMarker_.prototype = new GOverlay(); with ClusterMarker_.prototype = new GMarker(); so that I can get the openInfoWindow() function in the clustermarker, but that didnt worked out. Got some error. If possible, Please suggest solution so that this can be done with MarkerClusterer. Or else any other library which will be able to do this. Any help will be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • problem with sIFR 3 not displaying in IE just getting XXX

    - by user288306
    I am having a problem with sIFR 3 not displaying in IE. I get 3 larges black XXX in IE yet it displays fine in Firefox. I have checked i do have the most recent version of flash installed correctly. Here is the code on the page <div id="features"> <div id="mainmessage_advertisers"><h2>Advertisers</h2><br /><br /><h3><a href="">Reach your customers where they browse. Buy directly from top web publishers.</a></h3><br /><br /><br /><a href=""><img src="img/buyads.gif" border="0"></a></div> <div id="mainmessage_publishers"><h2>Publishers</h2><br /><br /><h3>Take control of your ad space and start generating more revenue than <u>ever before</u>.</h3><br /><br /><br /><a href=""><img src="img/sellads.gif" border="0"></a></div> </div>` Here is the code from my global.css #mainmessage_advertisers { width: 395px; height: 200px; padding: 90px 50px; border: 1px; float: left; } #mainmessage_publishers { width: 395px; height: 200px; padding: 90px 50px; float: right; } and here is what i have in my sifr.js /*********************************************************************** SIFR 3.0 (BETA 1) FUNCTIONS ************************************************************************/ var parseSelector=(function(){var _1=/\s*,\s*/;var _2=/\s*([\s>+~(),]|^|$)\s*/g;var _3=/([\s>+~,]|[^(]\+|^)([#.:@])/g;var _4=/^[^\s>+~]/;var _5=/[\s#.:>+~()@]|[^\s#.:>+~()@]+/g;function parseSelector(_6,_7){_7=_7||document.documentElement;var _8=_6.split(_1),_9=[];for(var i=0;i<_8.length;i++){var _b=[_7],_c=toStream(_8[i]);for(var j=0;j<_c.length;){var _e=_c[j++],_f=_c[j++],_10="";if(_c[j]=="("){while(_c[j++]!=")"&&j<_c.length){_10+=_c[j]}_10=_10.slice(0,-1)}_b=select(_b,_e,_f,_10)}_9=_9.concat(_b)}return _9}function toStream(_11){var _12=_11.replace(_2,"$1").replace(_3,"$1*$2");if(_4.test(_12)){_12=" "+_12}return _12.match(_5)||[]}function select(_13,_14,_15,_16){return (_17[_14])?_17[_14](_13,_15,_16):[]}var _18={toArray:function(_19){var a=[];for(var i=0;i<_19.length;i++){a.push(_19[i])}return a}};var dom={isTag:function(_1d,tag){return (tag=="*")||(tag.toLowerCase()==_1d.nodeName.toLowerCase())},previousSiblingElement:function(_1f){do{_1f=_1f.previousSibling}while(_1f&&_1f.nodeType!=1);return _1f},nextSiblingElement:function(_20){do{_20=_20.nextSibling}while(_20&&_20.nodeType!=1);return _20},hasClass:function(_21,_22){return (_22.className||"").match("(^|\\s)"+_21+"(\\s|$)")},getByTag:function(tag,_24){return _24.getElementsByTagName(tag)}};var _17={"#":function(_25,_26){for(var i=0;i<_25.length;i++){if(_25[i].getAttribute("id")==_26){return [_25[i]]}}return []}," ":function(_28,_29){var _2a=[];for(var i=0;i<_28.length;i++){_2a=_2a.concat(_18.toArray(dom.getByTag(_29,_28[i])))}return _2a},">":function(_2c,_2d){var _2e=[];for(var i=0,_30;i<_2c.length;i++){_30=_2c[i];for(var j=0,_32;j<_30.childNodes.length;j++){_32=_30.childNodes[j];if(_32.nodeType==1&&dom.isTag(_32,_2d)){_2e.push(_32)}}}return _2e},".":function(_33,_34){var _35=[];for(var i=0,_37;i<_33.length;i++){_37=_33[i];if(dom.hasClass([_34],_37)){_35.push(_37)}}return _35},":":function(_38,_39,_3a){return (pseudoClasses[_39])?pseudoClasses[_39](_38,_3a):[]}};parseSelector.selectors=_17;parseSelector.pseudoClasses={};parseSelector.util=_18;parseSelector.dom=dom;return parseSelector})(); var sIFR=new function(){var _3b=this;var _3c="sIFR-active";var _3d="sIFR-replaced";var _3e="sIFR-flash";var _3f="sIFR-ignore";var _40="sIFR-alternate";var _41="sIFR-class";var _42="sIFR-layout";var _43="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";var _44=6;var _45=126;var _46=8;var _47="SIFR-PREFETCHED";var _48=" ";this.isActive=false;this.isEnabled=true;this.hideElements=true;this.replaceNonDisplayed=false;this.preserveSingleWhitespace=false;this.fixWrap=true;this.registerEvents=true;this.setPrefetchCookie=true;this.cookiePath="/";this.domains=[];this.fromLocal=true;this.forceClear=false;this.forceWidth=true;this.fitExactly=false;this.forceTextTransform=true;this.useDomContentLoaded=true;this.debugMode=false;this.hasFlashClassSet=false;var _49=0;var _4a=false,_4b=false;var dom=new function(){this.getBody=function(){var _4d=document.getElementsByTagName("body");if(_4d.length==1){return _4d[0]}return null};this.addClass=function(_4e,_4f){if(_4f){_4f.className=((_4f.className||"")==""?"":_4f.className+" ")+_4e}};this.removeClass=function(_50,_51){if(_51){_51.className=_51.className.replace(new RegExp("(^|\\s)"+_50+"(\\s|$)"),"").replace(/^\s+|(\s)\s+/g,"$1")}};this.hasClass=function(_52,_53){return new RegExp("(^|\\s)"+_52+"(\\s|$)").test(_53.className)};this.create=function(_54){if(document.createElementNS){return document.createElementNS(_43,_54)}return document.createElement(_54)};this.setInnerHtml=function(_55,_56){if(ua.innerHtmlSupport){_55.innerHTML=_56}else{if(ua.xhtmlSupport){_56=["<root xmlns=\"",_43,"\">",_56,"</root>"].join("");var xml=(new DOMParser()).parseFromString(_56,"text/xml");xml=document.importNode(xml.documentElement,true);while(_55.firstChild){_55.removeChild(_55.firstChild)}while(xml.firstChild){_55.appendChild(xml.firstChild)}}}};this.getComputedStyle=function(_58,_59){var _5a;if(document.defaultView&&document.defaultView.getComputedStyle){_5a=document.defaultView.getComputedStyle(_58,null)[_59]}else{if(_58.currentStyle){_5a=_58.currentStyle[_59]}}return _5a||""};this.getStyleAsInt=function(_5b,_5c,_5d){var _5e=this.getComputedStyle(_5b,_5c);if(_5d&&!/px$/.test(_5e)){return 0}_5e=parseInt(_5e);return isNaN(_5e)?0:_5e};this.getZoom=function(){return _5f.zoom.getLatest()}};this.dom=dom;var ua=new function(){var ua=navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase();var _62=(navigator.product||"").toLowerCase();this.macintosh=ua.indexOf("mac")>-1;this.windows=ua.indexOf("windows")>-1;this.quicktime=false;this.opera=ua.indexOf("opera")>-1;this.konqueror=_62.indexOf("konqueror")>-1;this.ie=false/*@cc_on || true @*/;this.ieSupported=this.ie&&!/ppc|smartphone|iemobile|msie\s5\.5/.test(ua)/*@cc_on && @_jscript_version >= 5.5 @*/;this.ieWin=this.ie&&this.windows/*@cc_on && @_jscript_version >= 5.1 @*/;this.windows=this.windows&&(!this.ie||this.ieWin);this.ieMac=this.ie&&this.macintosh/*@cc_on && @_jscript_version < 5.1 @*/;this.macintosh=this.macintosh&&(!this.ie||this.ieMac);this.safari=ua.indexOf("safari")>-1;this.webkit=ua.indexOf("applewebkit")>-1&&!this.konqueror;this.khtml=this.webkit||this.konqueror;this.gecko=!this.webkit&&_62=="gecko";this.operaVersion=this.opera&&/.*opera(\s|\/)(\d+\.\d+)/.exec(ua)?parseInt(RegExp.$2):0;this.webkitVersion=this.webkit&&/.*applewebkit\/(\d+).*/.exec(ua)?parseInt(RegExp.$1):0;this.geckoBuildDate=this.gecko&&/.*gecko\/(\d{8}).*/.exec(ua)?parseInt(RegExp.$1):0;this.konquerorVersion=this.konqueror&&/.*konqueror\/(\d\.\d).*/.exec(ua)?parseInt(RegExp.$1):0;this.flashVersion=0;if(this.ieWin){var axo;var _64=false;try{axo=new ActiveXObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash.7")}catch(e){try{axo=new ActiveXObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash.6");this.flashVersion=6;axo.AllowScriptAccess="always"}catch(e){_64=this.flashVersion==6}if(!_64){try{axo=new ActiveXObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash")}catch(e){}}}if(!_64&&axo){this.flashVersion=parseFloat(/([\d,?]+)/.exec(axo.GetVariable("$version"))[1].replace(/,/g,"."))}}else{if(navigator.plugins&&navigator.plugins["Shockwave Flash"]){var _65=navigator.plugins["Shockwave Flash"];this.flashVersion=parseFloat(/(\d+\.?\d*)/.exec(_65.description)[1]);var i=0;while(this.flashVersion>=_46&&i<navigator.mimeTypes.length){var _67=navigator.mimeTypes[i];if(_67.type=="application/x-shockwave-flash"&&_67.enabledPlugin.description.toLowerCase().indexOf("quicktime")>-1){this.flashVersion=0;this.quicktime=true}i++}}}this.flash=this.flashVersion>=_46;this.transparencySupport=this.macintosh||this.windows;this.computedStyleSupport=this.ie||document.defaultView&&document.defaultView.getComputedStyle&&(!this.gecko||this.geckoBuildDate>=20030624);this.css=true;if(this.computedStyleSupport){try{var _68=document.getElementsByTagName("head")[0];_68.style.backgroundColor="#FF0000";var _69=dom.getComputedStyle(_68,"backgroundColor");this.css=!_69||/\#F{2}0{4}|rgb\(255,\s?0,\s?0\)/i.test(_69);_68=null}catch(e){}}this.xhtmlSupport=!!window.DOMParser&&!!document.importNode;this.innerHtmlSupport;try{var n=dom.create("span");if(!this.ieMac){n.innerHTML="x"}this.innerHtmlSupport=n.innerHTML=="x"}catch(e){this.innerHtmlSupport=false}this.zoomSupport=!!(this.opera&&document.documentElement);this.geckoXml=this.gecko&&(document.contentType||"").indexOf("xml")>-1;this.requiresPrefetch=this.ieWin||this.khtml;this.verifiedKonqueror=false;this.supported=this.flash&&this.css&&(!this.ie||this.ieSupported)&&(!this.opera||this.operaVersion>=8)&&(!this.webkit||this.webkitVersion>=412)&&(!this.konqueror||this.konquerorVersion>3.5)&&this.computedStyleSupport&&(this.innerHtmlSupport||!this.khtml&&this.xhtmlSupport)};this.ua=ua;var _6b=new function(){function capitalize($){return $.toUpperCase()}this.normalize=function(str){if(_3b.preserveSingleWhitespace){return str.replace(/\s/g,_48)}return str.replace(/(\s)\s+/g,"$1")};this.textTransform=function(_6e,str){switch(_6e){case "uppercase":str=str.toUpperCase();break;case "lowercase":str=str.toLowerCase();break;case "capitalize":var _70=str;str=str.replace(/^\w|\s\w/g,capitalize);if(str.indexOf("function capitalize")!=-1){var _71=_70.replace(/(^|\s)(\w)/g,"$1$1$2$2").split(/^\w|\s\w/g);str="";for(var i=0;i<_71.length;i++){str+=_71[i].charAt(0).toUpperCase()+_71[i].substring(1)}}break}return str};this.toHexString=function(str){if(typeof (str)!="string"||!str.charAt(0)=="#"||str.length!=4&&str.length!=7){return str}str=str.replace(/#/,"");if(str.length==3){str=str.replace(/(.)(.)(.)/,"$1$1$2$2$3$3")}return "0x"+str};this.toJson=function(obj){var _75="";switch(typeof (obj)){case "string":_75="\""+obj+"\"";break;case "number":case "boolean":_75=obj.toString();break;case "object":_75=[];for(var _76 in obj){if(obj[_76]==Object.prototype[_76]){continue}_75.push("\""+_76+"\":"+_6b.toJson(obj[_76]))}_75="{"+_75.join(",")+"}";break}return _75};this.convertCssArg=function(arg){if(!arg){return {}}if(typeof (arg)=="object"){if(arg.constructor==Array){arg=arg.join("")}else{return arg}}var obj={};var _79=arg.split("}");for(var i=0;i<_79.length;i++){var $=_79[i].match(/([^\s{]+)\s*\{(.+)\s*;?\s*/);if(!$||$.length!=3){continue}if(!obj[$[1]]){obj[$[1]]={}}var _7c=$[2].split(";");for(var j=0;j<_7c.length;j++){var $2=_7c[j].match(/\s*([^:\s]+)\s*\:\s*([^\s;]+)/);if(!$2||$2.length!=3){continue}obj[$[1]][$2[1]]=$2[2]}}return obj};this.extractFromCss=function(css,_80,_81,_82){var _83=null;if(css&&css[_80]&&css[_80][_81]){_83=css[_80][_81];if(_82){delete css[_80][_81]}}return _83};this.cssToString=function(arg){var css=[];for(var _86 in arg){var _87=arg[_86];if(_87==Object.prototype[_86]){continue}css.push(_86,"{");for(var _88 in _87){if(_87[_88]==Object.prototype[_88]){continue}css.push(_88,":",_87[_88],";")}css.push("}")}return escape(css.join(""))}};this.util=_6b;var _5f={};_5f.fragmentIdentifier=new function(){this.fix=true;var _89;this.cache=function(){_89=document.title};function doFix(){document.title=_89}this.restore=function(){if(this.fix){setTimeout(doFix,0)}}};_5f.synchronizer=new function(){this.isBlocked=false;this.block=function(){this.isBlocked=true};this.unblock=function(){this.isBlocked=false;_8a.replaceAll()}};_5f.zoom=new function(){var _8b=100;this.getLatest=function(){return _8b};if(ua.zoomSupport&&ua.opera){var _8c=document.createElement("div");_8c.style.position="fixed";_8c.style.left="-65536px";_8c.style.top="0";_8c.style.height="100%";_8c.style.width="1px";_8c.style.zIndex="-32";document.documentElement.appendChild(_8c);function updateZoom(){if(!_8c){return}var _8d=window.innerHeight/_8c.offsetHeight;var _8e=Math.round(_8d*100)%10;if(_8e>5){_8d=Math.round(_8d*100)+10-_8e}else{_8d=Math.round(_8d*100)-_8e}_8b=isNaN(_8d)?100:_8d;_5f.synchronizer.unblock();document.documentElement.removeChild(_8c);_8c=null}_5f.synchronizer.block();setTimeout(updateZoom,54)}};this.hacks=_5f;var _8f={kwargs:[],replaceAll:function(){for(var i=0;i<this.kwargs.length;i++){_3b.replace(this.kwargs[i])}this.kwargs=[]}};var _8a={kwargs:[],replaceAll:_8f.replaceAll};function isValidDomain(){if(_3b.domains.length==0){return true}var _91="";try{_91=document.domain}catch(e){}if(_3b.fromLocal&&sIFR.domains[0]!="localhost"){sIFR.domains.unshift("localhost")}for(var i=0;i<_3b.domains.length;i++){if(_3b.domains[i]=="*"||_3b.domains[i]==_91){return true}}return false}this.activate=function(){if(!ua.supported||!this.isEnabled||this.isActive||!isValidDomain()){return}this.isActive=true;if(this.hideElements){this.setFlashClass()}if(ua.ieWin&&_5f.fragmentIdentifier.fix&&window.location.hash!=""){_5f.fragmentIdentifier.cache()}else{_5f.fragmentIdentifier.fix=false}if(!this.registerEvents){return}function handler(evt){_3b.initialize();if(evt&&evt.type=="load"){if(document.removeEventListener){document.removeEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",handler,false);document.removeEventListener("load",handler,false)}if(window.removeEventListener){window.removeEventListener("load",handler,false)}}}if(window.addEventListener){if(_3b.useDomContentLoaded&&ua.gecko){document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",handler,false)}window.addEventListener("load",handler,false)}else{if(ua.ieWin){if(_3b.useDomContentLoaded&&!_4a){document.write("<scr"+"ipt id=__sifr_ie_onload defer src=//:></script>");document.getElementById("__sifr_ie_onload").onreadystatechange=function(){if(this.readyState=="complete"){handler();this.removeNode()}}}window.attachEvent("onload",handler)}}};this.setFlashClass=function(){if(this.hasFlashClassSet){return}dom.addClass(_3c,dom.getBody()||document.documentElement);this.hasFlashClassSet=true};this.removeFlashClass=function(){if(!this.hasFlashClassSet){return}dom.removeClass(_3c,dom.getBody());dom.removeClass(_3c,document.documentElement);this.hasFlashClassSet=false};this.initialize=function(){if(_4b||!this.isActive||!this.isEnabled){return}_4b=true;_8f.replaceAll();clearPrefetch()};function getSource(src){if(typeof (src)!="string"){if(src.src){src=src.src}if(typeof (src)!="string"){var _95=[];for(var _96 in src){if(src[_96]!=Object.prototype[_96]){_95.push(_96)}}_95.sort().reverse();var _97="";var i=-1;while(!_97&&++i<_95.length){if(parseFloat(_95[i])<=ua.flashVersion){_97=src[_95[i]]}}src=_97}}if(!src&&_3b.debugMode){throw new Error("sIFR: Could not determine appropriate source")}if(ua.ie&&src.charAt(0)=="/"){src=window.location.toString().replace(/([^:]+)(:\/?\/?)([^\/]+).*/,"$1$2$3")+src}return src}this.prefetch=function(){if(!ua.requiresPrefetch||!ua.supported||!this.isEnabled||!isValidDomain()){return}if(this.setPrefetchCookie&&new RegExp(";?"+_47+"=true;?").test(document.cookie)){return}try{_4a=true;if(ua.ieWin){prefetchIexplore(arguments)}else{prefetchLight(arguments)}if(this.setPrefetchCookie){document.cookie=_47+"=true;path="+this.cookiePath}}catch(e){if(_3b.debugMode){throw e}}};function prefetchIexplore(_99){for(var i=0;i<_99.length;i++){document.write("<embed src=\""+getSource(_99[i])+"\" sIFR-prefetch=\"true\" style=\"display:none;\">")}}function prefetchLight(_9b){for(var i=0;i<_9b.length;i++){new Image().src=getSource(_9b[i])}}function clearPrefetch(){if(!ua.ieWin||!_4a){return}try{var _9d=document.getElementsByTagName("embed");for(var i=_9d.length-1;i>=0;i--){var _9f=_9d[i];if(_9f.getAttribute("sIFR-prefetch")=="true"){_9f.parentNode.removeChild(_9f)}}}catch(e){}}function getRatio(_a0){if(_a0<=10){return 1.55}if(_a0<=19){return 1.45}if(_a0<=32){return 1.35}if(_a0<=71){return 1.3}return 1.25}function getFilters(obj){var _a2=[];for(var _a3 in obj){if(obj[_a3]==Object.prototype[_a3]){continue}var _a4=obj[_a3];_a3=[_a3.replace(/filter/i,"")+"Filter"];for(var _a5 in _a4){if(_a4[_a5]==Object.prototype[_a5]){continue}_a3.push(_a5+":"+escape(_6b.toJson(_6b.toHexString(_a4[_a5]))))}_a2.push(_a3.join(","))}return _a2.join(";")}this.replace=function(_a6,_a7){if(!ua.supported){return}if(_a7){for(var _a8 in _a6){if(typeof (_a7[_a8])=="undefined"){_a7[_a8]=_a6[_a8]}}_a6=_a7}if(!_4b){return _8f.kwargs.push(_a6)}if(_5f.synchronizer.isBlocked){return _8a.kwargs.push(_a6)}var _a9=_a6.elements;if(!_a9&&parseSelector){_a9=parseSelector(_a6.selector)}if(_a9.length==0){return}this.setFlashClass();var src=getSource(_a6.src);var css=_6b.convertCssArg(_a6.css);var _ac=getFilters(_a6.filters);var _ad=(_a6.forceClear==null)?_3b.forceClear:_a6.forceClear;var _ae=(_a6.fitExactly==null)?_3b.fitExactly:_a6.fitExactly;var _af=_ae||(_a6.forceWidth==null?_3b.forceWidth:_a6.forceWidth);var _b0=parseInt(_6b.extractFromCss(css,".sIFR-root","leading"))||0;var _b1=_6b.extractFromCss(css,".sIFR-root","background-color",true)||"#FFFFFF";var _b2=_6b.extractFromCss(css,".sIFR-root","opacity",true)||"100";if(parseFloat(_b2)<1){_b2=100*parseFloat(_b2)}var _b3=_6b.extractFromCss(css,".sIFR-root","kerning",true)||"";var _b4=_a6.gridFitType||_6b.extractFromCss(css,".sIFR-root","text-align")=="right"?"subpixel":"pixel";var _b5=_3b.forceTextTransform?_6b.extractFromCss(css,".sIFR-root","text-transform",true)||"none":"none";var _b6="";if(_ae){_6b.extractFromCss(css,".sIFR-root","text-align",true)}if(!_a6.modifyCss){_b6=_6b.cssToString(css)}var _b7=_a6.wmode||"";if(_b7=="transparent"){if(!ua.transparencySupport){_b7="opaque"}else{_b1="transparent"}}for(var i=0;i<_a9.length;i++){var _b9=_a9[i];if(!ua.verifiedKonqueror){if(dom.getComputedStyle(_b9,"lineHeight").match(/e\+08px/)){ua.supported=_3b.isEnabled=false;this.removeFlashClass();return}ua.verifiedKonqueror=true}if(dom.hasClass(_3d,_b9)||dom.hasClass(_3f,_b9)){continue}var _ba=false;if(!_b9.offsetHeight||!_b9.offsetWidth){if(!_3b.replaceNonDisplayed){continue}_b9.style.display="block";if(!_b9.offsetHeight||!_b9.offsetWidth){_b9.style.display="";continue}_ba=true}if(_ad&&ua.gecko){_b9.style.clear="both"}var _bb=null;if(_3b.fixWrap&&ua.ie&&dom.getComputedStyle(_b9,"display")=="block"){_bb=_b9.innerHTML;dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,"X")}var _bc=dom.getStyleAsInt(_b9,"width",ua.ie);if(ua.ie&&_bc==0){var _bd=dom.getStyleAsInt(_b9,"paddingRight",true);var _be=dom.getStyleAsInt(_b9,"paddingLeft",true);var _bf=dom.getStyleAsInt(_b9,"borderRightWidth",true);var _c0=dom.getStyleAsInt(_b9,"borderLeftWidth",true);_bc=_b9.offsetWidth-_be-_bd-_c0-_bf}if(_bb&&_3b.fixWrap&&ua.ie){dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,_bb)}var _c1,_c2;if(!ua.ie){_c1=dom.getStyleAsInt(_b9,"lineHeight");_c2=Math.floor(dom.getStyleAsInt(_b9,"height")/_c1)}else{if(ua.ie){var _bb=_b9.innerHTML;_b9.style.visibility="visible";_b9.style.overflow="visible";_b9.style.position="static";_b9.style.zoom="normal";_b9.style.writingMode="lr-tb";_b9.style.width=_b9.style.height="auto";_b9.style.maxWidth=_b9.style.maxHeight=_b9.style.styleFloat="none";var _c3=_b9;var _c4=_b9.currentStyle.hasLayout;if(_c4){dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,"<div class=\""+_42+"\">X<br />X<br />X</div>");_c3=_b9.firstChild}else{dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,"X<br />X<br />X")}var _c5=_c3.getClientRects();_c1=_c5[1].bottom-_c5[1].top;_c1=Math.ceil(_c1*0.8);if(_c4){dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,"<div class=\""+_42+"\">"+_bb+"</div>");_c3=_b9.firstChild}else{dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,_bb)}_c5=_c3.getClientRects();_c2=_c5.length;if(_c4){dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,_bb)}_b9.style.visibility=_b9.style.width=_b9.style.height=_b9.style.maxWidth=_b9.style.maxHeight=_b9.style.overflow=_b9.style.styleFloat=_b9.style.position=_b9.style.zoom=_b9.style.writingMode=""}}if(_ba){_b9.style.display=""}if(_ad&&ua.gecko){_b9.style.clear=""}_c1=Math.max(_44,_c1);_c1=Math.min(_45,_c1);if(isNaN(_c2)||!isFinite(_c2)){_c2=1}var _c6=Math.round(_c2*_c1);if(_c2>1&&_b0){_c6+=Math.round((_c2-1)*_b0)}var _c7=dom.create("span");_c7.className=_40;var _c8=_b9.cloneNode(true);for(var j=0,l=_c8.childNodes.length;j<l;j++){_c7.appendChild(_c8.childNodes[j].cloneNode(true))}if(_a6.modifyContent){_a6.modifyContent(_c8,_a6.selector)}if(_a6.modifyCss){_b6=_a6.modifyCss(css,_c8,_a6.selector)}var _cb=handleContent(_c8,_b5);if(_a6.modifyContentString){_cb=_a6.modifyContentString(_cb,_a6.selector)}if(_cb==""){continue}var _cc=["content="+_cb.replace(/\</g,"&lt;").replace(/>/g,"&gt;"),"width="+_bc,"height="+_c6,"fitexactly="+(_ae?"true":""),"tunewidth="+(_a6.tuneWidth||""),"tuneheight="+(_a6.tuneHeight||""),"offsetleft="+(_a6.offsetLeft||""),"offsettop="+(_a6.offsetTop||""),"thickness="+(_a6.thickness||""),"sharpness="+(_a6.sharpness||""),"kerning="+_b3,"gridfittype="+_b4,"zoomsupport="+ua.zoomSupport,"filters="+_ac,"opacity="+_b2,"blendmode="+(_a6.blendMode||""),"size="+_c1,"zoom="+dom.getZoom(),"css="+_b6];_cc=encodeURI(_cc.join("&amp;"));var _cd="sIFR_callback_"+_49++;var _ce={flashNode:null};window[_cd+"_DoFSCommand"]=(function(_cf){return function(_d0,arg){if(/(FSCommand\:)?resize/.test(_d0)){var $=arg.split(":");_cf.flashNode.setAttribute($[0],$[1]);if(ua.khtml){_cf.flashNode.innerHTML+=""}}}})(_ce);_c6=Math.round(_c2*getRatio(_c1)*_c1);var _d3=_af?_bc:"100%";var _d4;if(ua.ie){_d4=["<object classid=\"clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000\" id=\"",_cd,"\" sifr=\"true\" width=\"",_d3,"\" height=\"",_c6,"\" class=\"",_3e,"\">","<param name=\"movie\" value=\"",src,"\"></param>","<param name=\"flashvars\" value=\"",_cc,"\"></param>","<param name=\"allowScriptAccess\" value=\"always\"></param>","<param name=\"quality\" value=\"best\"></param>","<param name=\"wmode\" value=\"",_b7,"\"></param>","<param name=\"bgcolor\" value=\"",_b1,"\"></param>","<param name=\"name\" value=\"",_cd,"\"></param>","</object>","<scr","ipt event=FSCommand(info,args) for=",_cd,">",_cd,"_DoFSCommand(info, args);","</","script>"].join("")}else{_d4=["<embed class=\"",_3e,"\" type=\"application/x-shockwave-flash\" src=\"",src,"\" quality=\"best\" flashvars=\"",_cc,"\" width=\"",_d3,"\" height=\"",_c6,"\" wmode=\"",_b7,"\" bgcolor=\"",_b1,"\" name=\"",_cd,"\" allowScriptAccess=\"always\" sifr=\"true\"></embed>"].join("")}dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,_d4);_ce.flashNode=_b9.firstChild;_b9.appendChild(_c7);dom.addClass(_3d,_b9);if(_a6.onReplacement){_a6.onReplacement(_ce.flashNode)}}_5f.fragmentIdentifier.restore()};function handleContent(_d5,_d6){var _d7=[],_d8=[];var _d9=_d5.childNodes;var i=0;while(i<_d9.length){var _db=_d9[i];if(_db.nodeType==3){var _dc=_6b.normalize(_db.nodeValue);_dc=_6b.textTransform(_d6,_dc);_d8.push(_dc.replace(/\%/g,"%25").replace(/\&/g,"%26").replace(/\,/g,"%2C").replace(/\+/g,"%2B"))}if(_db.nodeType==1){var _dd=[];var _de=_db.nodeName.toLowerCase();var _df=_db.className||"";if(/\s+/.test(_df)){if(_df.indexOf(_41)){_df=_df.match("(\\s|^)"+_41+"-([^\\s$]*)(\\s|$)")[2]}else{_df=_df.match(/^([^\s]+)/)[1]}}if(_df!=""){_dd.push("class=\""+_df+"\"")}if(_de=="a"){var _e0=_db.getAttribute("href")||"";var _e1=_db.getAttribute("target")||"";_dd.push("href=\""+_e0+"\"","target=\""+_e1+"\"")}_d8.push("<"+_de+(_dd.length>0?" ":"")+escape(_dd.join(" "))+">");if(_db.hasChildNodes()){_d7.push(i);i=0;_d9=_db.childNodes;continue}else{if(!/^(br|img)$/i.test(_db.nodeName)){_d8.push("</",_db.nodeName.toLowerCase(),">")}}}if(_d7.length>0&&!_db.nextSibling){do{i=_d7.pop();_d9=_db.parentNode.parentNode.childNodes;_db=_d9[i];if(_db){_d8.push("</",_db.nodeName.toLowerCase(),">")}}while(i<_d9.length&&_d7.length>0)}i++}return _d8.join("").replace(/\n|\r/g,"")}}; sIFR.prefetch({ src: 'swf/sifr/helvetica.swf' }); sIFR.activate(); sIFR.replace({ selector: 'h2, h3', src: 'swf/sifr/helvetica.swf', wmode: 'transparent', css: { '.sIFR-root' : { 'color': '#000000', 'font-weight': 'bold', 'letter-spacing': '-1' }, 'a': { 'text-decoration': 'none' }, 'a:link': { 'color': '#000000' }, 'a:hover': { 'color': '#000000' }, '.span': { 'color': '#979797' }, 'label': { 'color': '#E11818' } } }); sIFR.replace({ selector: 'h4', src: 'swf/sifr/helvetica.swf', wmode: 'transparent', css: { '.sIFR-root' : { 'color': '#7E7E7E', 'font-weight': 'bold', 'letter-spacing': '-0.8' }, 'a': { 'text-decoration': 'none' }, 'a:link': { 'color': '#7E7E7E' }, 'a:hover': { 'color': '#7E7E7E' }, 'label': { 'color': '#E11818' } } }); sIFR.replace({ selector: '#cart p', src: 'swf/sifr/helvetica-lt.swf', wmode: 'transparent', css: { '.sIFR-root' : { 'color': '#979797', 'font-weight': 'bold', 'letter-spacing': '-0.8' }, 'a': { 'text-decoration': 'none' }, 'a:link': { 'color': '#979797' }, 'a:hover': { 'color': '#000000' }, 'label': { 'color': '#979797' } } }); Thank you in advance for your help!

    Read the article

  • jQuery.extend not working in Internet Explorer, but works in Firefox

    - by Jared Stark
    I am attempting the following: var Class1 = function() {} Class1.prototype = { MyMethod: function() { /* Do Stuff */ } } var Class2 = function() {} Class2.prototype = { AnotherMethod: function() { /* Do More Sweet Stuff */ } } jquery.extend(true, Class1, Class2); I should now expect to be able to do the following: var c = new Class1(); c.AnotherMethod(); In Firefox 3.6 this works just fine. In Internet Explorer 7 & 8 it says "Object doesn't support this property or method". Am I misunderstanding how $.extend should work, or is IE behaving badly? jQuery Version: 1.3.2 Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Javascript DateFormat for different timezones

    - by Elie
    I'm a Java developer and I'm used to the SimpleDateFormat class that allows me to format any date to any format by settings a timezone. Date date = new Date(); SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MM-yyyy hh:mm:ss"); sdf.setTimeZone(TimeZone.getTimeZone("America/Los_Angeles")); System.out.println(sdf.format(date)); // Prints date in Los Angeles sdf.setTimeZone(TimeZone.getTimeZone("America/Chicago")); System.out.println(sdf.format(date)); // Prints same date in Chicago SimpleDateFormat is a pretty neat solution in Java but unfortunately I can't find any similar alternative in Javascript. I'm extending the Date prototype in Javascript to do exactly the same. I have dates in Unix format but I want to format them in different timezones. Date.prototype.format = function(format, timezone) { // Now what? return formattedDate; } I'm looking for a neat way to do this rather than a hack. Thanks

    Read the article

  • jQTouch with PhoneGap on webOS

    - by Steve Nay
    I'm writing an application in PhoneGap that I want to run on iOS, Android, and webOS. jQTouch plays nice with everything on iOS and Android, but not webOS. Since the webOS Mojo framework is based on Prototype (which uses the $ variable), it's necessary to use jQuery in noConflict mode. I can handle that much. However, the problem is that I also want to use the jQTouch plugin. The jqtouch.js file uses $ throughout, causing JavaScript errors when that file is loaded. Is there a way to run the jQTouch plugin (or any plugin for that matter) in my PhoneGap application without interfering with Prototype?

    Read the article

  • zoom_changed only triggers once in google maps api version 3 using MVC

    - by fredrik
    Hi, I'm trying to use the MVC objects in google maps version 3. What I can't seem to figure out is why my zoom_changed method is only invoked once. When I first load the map the zoom_changed method is invoked. But not when I zoom on the map. function MarkerWidget (options) { this.setValues(options); this.set('zoom', this.map.zoom); var marker = new google.maps.Marker({ icon : this.icon, mouseOverIcon : this.mouseOverIcon, orgIcon : this.orgIcon }); marker.bindTo('map', this); marker.bindTo('position', this); google.maps.event.addListener(marker, 'mouseover', this.onmouseover); google.maps.event.addListener(marker, 'mouseout', this.onmouseout); } MarkerWidget.prototype = new google.maps.MVCObject(); MarkerWidget.prototype.zoom_changed = function () { $.log(this, new Date()); } Shouldn't the map object fire the zoom event and notify all object's that has "this.set('zoom', this.map.zoom)" ? ..fredrik

    Read the article

  • Better to build or buy a compute grid platform?

    - by James B
    I am looking to do some quite processor-intensive brute force processing for string matching. I have run my prototype in a multi-threaded environment and compared the performance to an implementation using Gridgain with a couple of nodes (also multithreaded). The performance I observed was that my Gridgain implementation performed slower to my multithreaded implementation. It could be the case that there was a flaw in my gridgain implementation, but it was only a prototype, and I thought the results were indicative. So my question is this: What are the advantages of having to learn and then build an implementation for a particular grid platform (hadoop, gridgain, or EC2 if going hosted - other suggestions welcome), when one could fairly easily put together a lightweight compute grid platform with a much shallower learning curve?...i.e. what do we get for free with these cloud/grid platforms that are worth having/tricky to implement? (Please note, I don't have any need for a data grid) Cheers, -James (p.s. Happy to make this community wiki if needbe)

    Read the article

  • Where to put the default destroy in the jQuery UI 1.8.1 widget's destroy function

    - by dominicminicoopers
    Ok, I'm having a slight bit of confusion writing my own jQuery UI widget plugins. The problem lies in the destroy function. In the docs, it says to put the default destroy first then write other things particular to the widget after it. $.Widget.prototype.destroy.apply(this, arguments); // default destroy // now do other stuff particular to this widget See http://jqueryui.com/docs/Developer_Guide However in their example scripts (those being the actual pluings for jQuery Ui released code, does it the opposite. The $.Widget.prototype.destroy.apply(this, arguments); is at the end of the function. See http://dev.jqueryui.com/browser/trunk/ui/jquery.ui.progressbar.js (and all of the other built in widgets as well) So which is it? The way the current widgets are written, or by the explanation in the code comment in the Developer_Guide?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  | Next Page >