Search Results

Search found 5644 results on 226 pages for 'unique constraints'.

Page 22/226 | < Previous Page | 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29  | Next Page >

  • How should I define a composite foreign key for domain constraints in the presence of surrogate keys

    - by Samuel Danielson
    I am writing a new app with Rails so I have an id column on every table. What is the best practice for enforcing domain constraints using foreign keys? I'll outline my thoughts and frustration. Here's what I would imagine as "The Rails Way". It's what I started with. Companies: id: integer, serial company_code: char, unique, not null Invoices: id: integer, serial company_id: integer, not null Products: id: integer, serial sku: char, unique, not null company_id: integer, not null LineItems: id: integer, serial invoice_id: integer, not null, references Invoices (id) product_id: integer, not null, references Products (id) The problem with this is that a product from one company might appear on an invoice for a different company. I added a (company_id: integer, not null) to LineItems, sort of like I'd do if only using natural keys and serials, then added a composite foreign key. LineItems (product_id, company_id) references Products (id, company_id) LineItems (invoice_id, company_id) references Invoices (id, company_id) This properly constrains LineItems to a single company but it seems over-engineered and wrong. company_id in LineItems is extraneous because the surrogate foreign keys are already unique in the foreign table. Postgres requires that I add a unique index for the referenced attributes so I am creating a unique index on (id, company_id) in Products and Invoices, even though id is simply unique. The following table with natural keys and a serial invoice number would not have these issues. LineItems: company_code: char, not null sku: char, not null invoice_id: integer, not null I can ignore the surrogate keys in the LineItems table but this also seems wrong. Why make the database join on char when it has an integer already there to use? Also, doing it exactly like the above would require me to add company_code, a natural foreign key, to Products and Invoices. The compromise... LineItems: company_id: integer, not null sku: integer, not null invoice_id: integer, not null does not require natural foreign keys in other tables but it is still joining on char when there is a integer available. Is there a clean way to enforce domain constraints with foreign keys like God intended, but in the presence of surrogates, without turning the schema and indexes into a complicated mess?

    Read the article

  • php getting unique values of a multidimensional array

    - by Mark
    I have an array like this: $a = array ( 0 => array ( 'value' => 'America', ), 1 => array ( 'value' => 'England', ), 2 => array ( 'value' => 'Australia', ), 3 => array ( 'value' => 'America', ), 4 => array ( 'value' => 'England', ), 5 => array ( 'value' => 'Canada', ), ) How can I remove the duplicate values so that I get this: $a = array ( 0 => array ( 'value' => 'America', ), 1 => array ( 'value' => 'England', ), 2 => array ( 'value' => 'Australia', ), 4 => array ( 'value' => 'Canada', ), ) I tried using array_unique, but that doesn't work due to this array being multidimensional, I think. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Selecting info from multiple tables for one unique ID with PHP and MySQL

    - by Mark
    I'm using PHP and MySQL. Is this the best method to select information about "user_1" from four different tables? I know it works, because I have tried it. But is this the preferred method of selecting information from multiple tables for "user_1"? $query = "SELECT table_1.username, table_2.city, table_3.state, table_4.country FROM table_1 JOIN table_2 ON table_1.username=table_2.city JOIN table_3 ON table_1.username=table_3.state JOIN table_4 ON table_1.username=table_4.country WHERE table_1.username = 'user_1'";

    Read the article

  • Auto Generate alphanumeric Unique Id with C#

    - by mag1981
    Hi All, total string length is 5 chars I have a scenario, ID starts with A0001 and ends with A9999 then B0001 to B9999 until F0001 to f9999 after that FA001 to FA999 then FB001 to FB999 until ....FFFF9 Please suggest any idea on how to create this format Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • SQL Syntax to count unique users completing a task

    - by Belliez
    I have the following code which shows me what users has completed ticket and this lists each user and the date they close a ticket. i.e. Paul Matt Matt Bob Matt Paul Matt Matt At the moment I manually count each user myself to see their totals for the day. EDIT: Changed output as columns instead of rows: What I have been trying to do is get SQL Server to do this for me i.e. the final result to look like: Paul | 2 Matt | 5 Bob | 1 My code I am currently using is and I would be greatful if someone can help me change this so I can get it outputting something similar to above? DECLARE @StartDate DateTime; DECLARE @EndDate DateTime; -- Date format: YYYY-MM-DD SET @StartDate = '2013-11-06 00:00:00' SET @EndDate = GETDATE() -- Today SELECT (select Username from Membership where UserId = Ticket.CompletedBy) as TicketStatusChangedBy FROM Ticket INNER JOIN TicketStatus ON Ticket.TicketStatusID = TicketStatus.TicketStatusID INNER JOIN Membership ON Ticket.CheckedInBy = Membership.UserId WHERE TicketStatus.TicketStatusName = 'Completed' and Ticket.ClosedDate >= @StartDate --(GETDATE() - 1) and Ticket.ClosedDate <= @EndDate --(GETDATE()-0) ORDER BY Ticket.CompletedBy ASC, Ticket.ClosedDate ASC Thank you for your help and time.

    Read the article

  • Unique identifier for an email

    - by Skywalker
    I am writing a C# application which allows users to store emails in a MS SQL Server database. Many times, multiple users will be copied on an email from a customer. If they all try to add the same email to the database, I want to make sure that the email is only added once. MD5 springs to mind as a way to do this. I don't need to worry about malicious tampering, only to make sure that the same email will map to the same hash and that no two emails with different content will map to the same hash. My question really boils down to how one would combine multiple fields into one MD5 (or other) hash value. Some of these fields will have a single value per email (e.g. subject, body, sender email address) while others will have multiple values (varying numbers of attachments, recipients). I want to develop a way of uniquely identifying an email that will be platform and language independent (not based on serialization). Any advice?

    Read the article

  • Tracking unique versions of files with hashes

    - by rwmnau
    I'm going to be tracking different versions of potentially millions of different files, and my intent is to hash them to determine I've already seen that particular version of the file. Currently, I'm only using MD5 (the product is still in development, so it's never dealt with millions of files yet), which is clearly not long enough to avoid collisions. However, here's my question - Am I more likely to avoid collisions if I hash the file using two different methods and store both hashes (say, SHA1 and MD5), or if I pick a single, longer hash (like SHA256) and rely on that alone? I know option 1 has 288 hash bits and option 2 has only 256, but assume my two choices are the same total hash length. Since I'm dealing with potentially millions of files (and multiple versions of those files over time), I'd like to do what I can to avoid collisions. However, CPU time isn't (completely) free, so I'm interested in how the community feels about the tradeoff - is adding more bits to my hash proportionally more expensive to compute, and are there any advantages to multiple different hashes as opposed to a single, longer hash, given an equal number of bits in both solutions?

    Read the article

  • Unique issue with Rails setup

    - by Alexis Abril
    Becoming a bit of a Ruby convert, but I've run into an issue with my Rails installation. I realize, in spirit, this question may overlap with superuser.com, but am asking here due to the nature of the installation. My command: sudo gem install rails Response is: /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/spec_fetcher.rb:232: warning:getc is obsolete; use STDIN.getc instead The "/opt/local" may be giving away the fact I'm using MacPorts(Mac OS 10.4). After that response, there is no new command line issued by the system, just a hang. Any insite is greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Win32 API P-Invoke to bring a disk online, offline, and set unique ID

    - by Andy Schneider
    I am currently using Diskpart to accomplish these functions, but i would like to be able to use P-Invoke and not have to shell out to an external process in my C# app. The example Diskpart scripts are: //Online a disk Select disk 7 disk online // Reset GPT Identifier select disk 7 UNIQUEID DISK ID=baf784e7-6bbd-4cfb-aaac-e86c96e166ee I tried searching pinvoke.net but could only find functions that dealt with volumes, not disks. Any idea on how to accomplish these diskpart commands using Pinvoke?

    Read the article

  • Unique ways to use the Null Coalescing operator

    - by Atomiton
    I know the standard way of using the Null coalescing operator in C# is to set default values. string nobody = null; string somebody = "Bob Saget"; string anybody = ""; anybody = nobody ?? "Mr. T"; // returns Mr. T anybody = somebody ?? "Mr. T"; // returns "Bob Saget" But what else can ?? be used for? It doesn't seem as useful as the ternary operator, apart from being more concise and easier to read than: nobody = null; anybody = nobody == null ? "Bob Saget" : nobody; // returns Bob Saget So given that fewer even know about null coalescing operator... Have you used ?? for something else? Is ?? necessary, or should you just use the ternary operator (that most are familiar with)

    Read the article

  • I'm using a sequence in Factory Girl to get unique values but I'm getting validation errors

    - by Sean Seefried
    I have a model defined this way class Lga < ActiveRecord::Base validates_uniqueness_of :code validates_presence_of :name end I've defined a factory for Lgas with Factory.sequence(:lga_id) { |n| n + 10000 } Factory.define :lga do |l| id = Factory.next :lga_id l.code "lga_#{id}" l.name "LGA #{id}" end However, when I run Factory.create(:lga) Factory.create(:lga) in script/console I get >> Factory.create(:lga) => #<Lga id: 2, code: "lga_10001", name: "LGA 10001", created_at: "2010-03-18 23:55:29", updated_at: "2010-03-18 23:55:29"> >> Factory.create(:lga) ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: Validation failed: Code has already been taken

    Read the article

  • mySQL need to merge fields and get unique rows

    - by jiudev
    i have a database with +1 million rows and the stuktur looks like: CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `Performance` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `CIDs` varchar(100) DEFAULT NULL, `COLOR` varchar(100) DEFAULT NULL, `Name` varchar(255) DEFAULT NULL, `XT` bigint(16) DEFAULT NULL, `MP` varchar(100) DEFAULT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`), KEY `CIDs` (`CIDs`), KEY `COLOR` (`COLOR`), KEY `Name` (`Name`), KEY `XT` (`XT`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 AUTO_INCREMENT=0 ; insert into `Performance` (`id`, `CIDs`, `COLOR`, `Name`, `XT`, `MP`) VALUES (1, '1253374160', 'test test test test test', 'Load1', '89421331221', ''), (2, '1271672029', NULL, 'Load1', '19421331221', NULL), (3, '1188959688', NULL, 'Load2', '39421331221', NULL), (4, '1271672029', NULL, 'Load3', '49421341221', 'Description'), (5, '1271888888', NULL, 'Load4', '59421331221', 'Description'); The Output should look like: +----+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-------------+-------+-----------+---------+ | id | CIDs | COLOR | XT | MP | Name | PIDs | unqName | +----+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-------------+-------+-----------+---------+ | 1 | 1253374160 | test test test test test | 89421331221 | | Load1 | 1,2 | Load1 | | 3 | 1188959688 | NULL | 39421331221 | NULL | Load2 | 3 | Load2 | | 4 | 1271672029 | NULL | 49421341221 | Description | Load3 | 4,5 | Load3 | +----+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-------------+-------+-----------+---------+ any ideas, how i could do this as fast as possible? I have tried with some group by, but it takes some Minutes :/ Thanks Advance //edit: for the solution with the group by, i needed 4 subquerys :/ //edit2: as requested: select id, CIDs, COLOR, XT, MP, Name, concat(PIDs,",",GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT id)) as PIDs, IFNULL(Name,id) as unqName from ( select id, CIDs, COLOR, XT, MP, Name, concat(PIDs,",",GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT id)) as PIDs, IFNULL(MP,id) as unqMP from ( select id, CIDs, COLOR, XT, MP, Name, concat(PIDs,",",GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT id)) as PIDs, IFNULL(XT,id) as unqXT from ( select id, CIDs, COLOR, XT, MP, Name, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT id) as PIDs, IFNULL(COLOR,id) as unqCOLOR from Performance group by unqCOLOR ) m group by unqXT ) x group by unqMP ) y group by unqName

    Read the article

  • Jquery:: How can select clicked element in table without define unique id for each element

    - by Yosef
    Hello, I have table (that generated by server) below. I want to get input element value class="itemQuantity" of clicked row. I write Jquery code but he missing "this" of clicked element. <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $('.updateButton').click(function() { alert($('.itemQuantity').val()); }); }); </script> How Can I do it with jquery(I thinking to use this and not create id for each element, but I have low knoledge in jquery). Thanks, Yosef <table id="items"> <tr> <th>item id</th> <th>item name</th> <th>item quantity</th> <th>item update</th> </tr> <tr> <td class="itemID"> 1 </td> <td class="itemName"> Ferari </td> <td > <input class="itemQuantity" type="text" size="4"/> </td> <td> <button class="updateButton" >update item</button> </td> </tr> <tr> <td class="itemID"> 2 </td> <td class="itemName"> Fiat </td> <td > <input class="itemQuantity" type="text" size="4"/> </td> <td> <button class="updateButton" >update item</button> </td> </tr> <tr> <td class="itemID"> 3 </td> <td class="itemName"> Hundai </td> <td > <input class="itemQuantity" type="text" size="4"/> </td> <td> <button class="updateButton" >update item</button> </td> </tr> </table>

    Read the article

  • jQuery: How can select clicked element in table without define unique id for each element

    - by Yosef
    Hello, I have table (that generated by server) below. I want to get input element value class="itemQuantity" of clicked row. I write jQuery code but he missing "this" of clicked element. <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $('.updateButton').click(function() { alert($('.itemQuantity').val()); }); }); </script> How can I do it with jQuery (I thinking to use this and not create id for each element, but I have low knowledge in jQuery). Thanks, Yosef <table id="items"> <tr> <th>item id</th> <th>item name</th> <th>item quantity</th> <th>item update</th> </tr> <tr> <td class="itemID"> 1 </td> <td class="itemName"> Ferari </td> <td > <input class="itemQuantity" type="text" size="4" /> </td> <td> <button class="updateButton">update item</button> </td> </tr> <tr> <td class="itemID"> 2 </td> <td class="itemName"> Fiat </td> <td > <input class="itemQuantity" type="text" size="4" /> </td> <td> <button class="updateButton">update item</button> </td> </tr> <tr> <td class="itemID"> 3 </td> <td class="itemName"> Hundai </td> <td > <input class="itemQuantity" type="text" size="4" /> </td> <td> <button class="updateButton">update item</button> </td> </tr> </table>

    Read the article

  • Adding unique objects to Core Data

    - by absolut
    I'm working on an iPhone app that gets a number of objects from a database. I'd like to store these using Core Data, but I'm having problems with my relationships. A Detail contains any number of POIs (points of interest). When I fetch a set of POI's from the server, they contain a detail ID. In order to associate the POI with the Detail (by ID), my process is as follows: Query the ManagedObjectContext for the detailID. If that detail exists, add the poi to it. If it doesn't, create the detail (it has other properties that will be populated lazily). The problem with this is performance. Performing constant queries to Core Data is slow, to the point where adding a list of 150 POI's takes a minute thanks to the multiple relationships involved. In my old model, before Core Data (various NSDictionary cache objects) this process was super fast (look up a key in a dictionary, then create it if it doesn't exist) I have more relationships than just this one, but pretty much every one has to do this check (some are many to many, and they have a real problem). Does anyone have any suggestions for how I can help this? I could perform fewer queries (by searching for a number of different ID's), but I'm not sure how much this will help. Some code: POI *poi = [NSEntityDescription insertNewObjectForEntityForName:@"POI" inManagedObjectContext:[(AppDelegate*)[UIApplication sharedApplication].delegate managedObjectContext]]; poi.POIid = [attributeDict objectForKey:kAttributeID]; poi.detailId = [attributeDict objectForKey:kAttributeDetailID]; Detail *detail = [self findDetailForID:poi.POIid]; if(detail == nil) { detail = [NSEntityDescription insertNewObjectForEntityForName:@"Detail" inManagedObjectContext:[(AppDelegate*)[UIApplication sharedApplication].delegate managedObjectContext]]; detail.title = poi.POIid; detail.subtitle = @""; detail.detailType = [attributeDict objectForKey:kAttributeType]; } -(Detail*)findDetailForID:(NSString*)detailID { NSManagedObjectContext *moc = [[UIApplication sharedApplication].delegate managedObjectContext]; NSEntityDescription *entityDescription = [NSEntityDescription entityForName:@"Detail" inManagedObjectContext:moc]; NSFetchRequest *request = [[[NSFetchRequest alloc] init] autorelease]; [request setEntity:entityDescription]; NSPredicate *predicate = [NSPredicate predicateWithFormat: @"detailid == %@", detailID]; [request setPredicate:predicate]; NSLog(@"%@", [predicate description]); NSError *error; NSArray *array = [moc executeFetchRequest:request error:&error]; if (array == nil || [array count] != 1) { // Deal with error... return nil; } return [array objectAtIndex:0]; }

    Read the article

  • Populating cell in UITableView with unique items

    - by aahrens
    I have an array of URL Links that I'm trying to load into a Grouped UITableView. The goal being that I have numberOfSectionsInTableView return [url count] so I can have number of sections equal to the number of url links. Then in numberOfRowsInSection returns 1 so I only populate 1 URL for each section. The trouble I'm having is to ensure that cellForRowAtIndexPath won't keep grabbing the first url link. I suspect it's because it's always grabbing the first url because the rowIndex is always zero. Any ideas how to ensure that each cell in my UITableView is populated with a different url link? - (NSInteger)numberOfSectionsInTableView:(UITableView *)tableView { return [newsItems count]; } - (NSInteger)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView numberOfRowsInSection:(NSInteger)section { return 1; } - (UITableViewCell *)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView cellForRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath { static NSString *MyIdentifier = @"MyIdentifier"; UITableViewCell *cell = [tableView dequeueReusableCellWithIdentifier:MyIdentifier]; if (cell == nil) { cell = [[[UITableViewCell alloc] initWithStyle:UITableViewCellStyleDefault reuseIdentifier:MyIdentifier] autorelease]; cell = [[[UITableViewCell alloc] initWithFrame:CGRectZero reuseIdentifier:MyIdentifier] autorelease]; cell.textLabel.lineBreakMode = UILineBreakModeWordWrap; cell.textLabel.numberOfLines = 5; } // Configure the cell. Get the title of the news item that was parsed out int newsItemIndex = [indexPath indexAtPosition: [indexPath length] - 1]; [cell.textLabel setText:[[newsItems objectAtIndex: newsItemIndex] objectForKey: @"link"]]; return cell; }

    Read the article

  • JQuery & Wordpress - Hide multiple divs inside unique ID?

    - by steelfrog
    I'm trying to write a short Wordpress JQuery for Wordpress comments that would allow users to toggle specific comments on and off. This is my first script, and I'm having a tough time. Once overtly simplified, the comments are formatted like so: <li id="li-comment-<?php comment_ID() ?>"> <div class="gravatar"><img src="#" /></div> <div class="comment_poster">Username</div> <div class="comment_options">Option buttons</div> <div class="comment_content">Comment</div> </li> In the "comment_options" DIV is a series of buttons that control the individual comments (reply, quote, edit, close, etc.). The close button is what I'm trying to write this script for. I need it to toggle the "gravtar" and "comment_content" DIVs, but leave the rest in place so that it still displays the user ID and controls. However, I can't seem to figure out how to contain the action. This is what I have so far: $(document).ready(function() { $("div.trigger").click(function() { $("div.gravatar").slideToggle(); $("div.comment_content").slideToggle(); }); }); The problem with this is that it closes are the .gravatar and .comment_content on the page, not just the ones found in the same list item. If you're curious, this is the page I'm working on. Any idea how I could resolve this? Again, this is my firs time with JQuery, so I'm a little fuzzy on how it all works. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • SQL to retrieve the latest records, grouping by unique foreign keys

    - by jbox
    I'm creating query to retrieve the latest posts in a forum using a SQL DB. I've got a table called "Post". Each post has a foreign key relation to a "Thread" and a "User" as well as a creation date. The trick is I don't want to show two posts by the same user or two posts in the same thread. Is it possible to create a query that contains all this logic? # Grab the last 10 posts. SELECT id, user_id, thread_id FROM posts ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 10; # Grab the last 10 posts, max one post per user SELECT id, user_id, thread_id FROM post GROUP BY user_id ORDER BY date DESC LIMIT 10; # Grab the last 10 posts, max one post per user, max one post per thread???

    Read the article

  • Mysql results sorted by list which is unique for each user

    - by ADAM
    Ive got a table of thousands of products and 50 or so authenticated users. These users all show the products on their own web sites and they all require the ability to have them ordered differently. Im guesing i need some kind of seperate table for the orders which contains the product_id, user_id and order column? How do i do this the most efficiently in mysql so as to be very fast, and not slow down if i get millions of products in the database. Is it even wise to do it in mysql or should i be using some kind of other index like solr/lucene? My Product table is called "products" My User table is called "users" A good example of the functionality i need is google search where you can order/supress the results if you are logged in. edit: the product results will be paginated and the users have the authority to edit the products, so its not just ready only

    Read the article

  • T-SQL Table Joins - Unique Situation

    - by Dimitri
    Hello Everyone. This is my first time encountering the case like this and don't quite know how to handle. Situation: I have one table tblSettingsDefinition, with fields: ID, GroupID, Name, typeID, DefaultValue. Then I have tblSettingtypes with fields TypeID, Name. And I have final table, tblUserSettings with fields SettingID, SettingDefinitionID, UserID, Value. The whole point of this is to have customizable settings. Setting can be defined for a Group or as global setting (if GroupID is NULL). It will have a default value, but if user modifies the setting, an entry is added to tblUserSettings that stores new value. I want to have a query that grabs user settings by first looking at the tblUserSettings, and if it has records for the given user, grabs them, if not retrieves default settings. But the trick is that no matter if user has settings or not, I need to have fields from other two table retrieved to know the setting's Type, Name etc... (which are stored in those other tables). I'm writing query something like this: SELECT * FROM tblSettingDefinition SD LEFT JOIN tblUserSettings US ON SD.SettingID = US.SettingDefinitionID JOIN tblSettingTypes ST ON SD.TypeID=ST.ID WHERE US.UserID=@UserID OR ((SD.GroupID IS NULL) OR (SD.GroupID=(SELECT GroupID FROM tblUser WHERE ID=@UserID))) but it retrieves settings for all users from tblUserSettings instead of just ones that match current @UserID. And if @UserID has no records in tblUserSettings, still, all user settings are retrieved instead of the defaults from tblSettingDefinition. Hope I made myself clear. Any help would be highly appreciated. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Managing Unique IDs in stateless (web) DB4O applications

    - by Phil.Wheeler
    I'm playing around with building a new web application using DB4O - piles of fun and some really interesting stuff learned. The one thing I'm struggling with is DB4O's current lack of support for stateless applications (i.e. web apps, mostly) and the need for automatically-generated IDs. There are a number of creative and interesting approaches that I've been able to find that hook into DB4O's events, use GUIDs rather than numeric IDs or for whatever reason avoid using any system of ID at all. While each approach has its merits, I'm wondering if the less-elegant approach might equally be the best fit. Consider the following pseudo-code: If ID == 0 or null Set ID = (typeof(myObject)).Count myObject.Save It seems like such a blindingly simple approach, it's usually about here that I start thinking, "I've missed something really obvious". Have I?

    Read the article

  • Unique element ID, even if element doesn't have one

    - by Robert J. Walker
    I'm writing a GreaseMonkey script where I'm iterating through a bunch of elements. For each element, I need a string ID that I can use to reference that element later. The element itself doesn't have an id attribute, and I can't modify the original document to give it one (although I can make DOM changes in my script). I can't store the references in my script because when I need them, the GreaseMonkey script itself will have gone out of scope. Is there some way to get at an "internal" ID that the browser uses, for example? A Firefox-only solution is fine; a cross-browser solution that could be applied in other scenarios would be awesome. Edit: If the GreaseMonkey script is out of scope, how are you referencing the elements later? They GreaseMonkey script is adding events to DOM objects. I can't store the references in an array or some other similar mechanism because when the event fires, the array will be gone because the GreaseMonkey script will have gone out of scope. So the event needs some way to know about the element reference that the script had when the event was attached. And the element in question is not the one to which it is attached. Can't you just use a custom property on the element? Yes, but the problem is on the lookup. I'd have to resort to iterating through all the elements looking for the one that has that custom property set to the desired id. That would work, sure, but in large documents it could be very time consuming. I'm looking for something where the browser can do the lookup grunt work. Wait, can you or can you not modify the document? I can't modify the source document, but I can make DOM changes in the script. I'll clarify in the question. Can you not use closures? Closuses did turn out to work, although I initially thought they wouldn't. See my later post. It sounds like the answer to the question: "Is there some internal browser ID I could use?" is "No."

    Read the article

  • jQuery: select all inputs with unique id (Regex/Wildcard Selectors)

    - by d3020
    I have some textboxes on a webform that have ids like this: txtFinalDeadline_1 txtFinalDeadline_2 txtFinalDeadline_3 txtFinalDeadline_4 In my jQuery how do I find all of those in order to assign a value to them. Before I had the underscore and they were all named txtFinalDeadline I could do this and it worked. $(this).find("#txtFinalDeadline").val(formatDate); However, that was when they were all named the same thing. Now I have the _x after the name and I'm not sure how to go about assigning that same value as before to them. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Rails: three most recent comments with unique users

    - by Dennis Collective
    what would I put in the named scope :by_unique_users so that I can do Comment.recent.by_unique_users.limit(3), and only get one comment per user? class User has_many :comments end class Comment belongs_to :user named_scope :recent, :order => 'comments.created_at DESC' named_scope :limit, lambda { |limit| {:limit => limit}} named_scope :by_unique_users end on sqlite named_scope :by_unique_user, :group = "user_id" works, but makes it freak out on postgres, which is deployed on production PGError: ERROR: column "comments.id" must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29  | Next Page >