Search Results

Search found 32851 results on 1315 pages for 'vsts database edition'.

Page 239/1315 | < Previous Page | 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246  | Next Page >

  • On Redirect - Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server...

    - by Craig Russell
    Hello (this is a long post sorry), I am writing a application in ASP.NET MVC 2 and I have reached a point where I am receiving this error when I connect remotely to my Server. Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to failure in retrieving the user's local application data path. Please make sure the user has a local user profile on the computer. The connection will be closed. I thought I had worked around this problem locally, as I was getting this error in debug when site was redirected to a baseUrl if a subdomain was invalid using this code: protected override void Initialize(RequestContext requestContext) { string[] host = requestContext.HttpContext.Request.Headers["Host"].Split(':'); _siteProvider.Initialise(host, LiveMeet.Properties.Settings.Default["baseUrl"].ToString()); base.Initialize(requestContext); } protected override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext) { if (Site == null) { string[] host = filterContext.HttpContext.Request.Headers["Host"].Split(':'); string newUrl; if (host.Length == 2) newUrl = "http://sample.local:" + host[1]; else newUrl = "http://sample.local"; Response.Redirect(newUrl, true); } ViewData["Site"] = Site; base.OnActionExecuting(filterContext); } public Site Site { get { return _siteProvider.GetCurrentSite(); } } The Site object is returned from a Provider named siteProvider, this does two checks, once against a database containing a list of all available subdomains, then if that fails to find a valid subdomain, or valid domain name, searches a memory cache of reserved domains, if that doesn't hit then returns a baseUrl where all invalid domains are redirected. locally this worked when I added the true to Response.Redirect, assuming a halting of the current execution and restarting the execution on the browser redirect. What I have found in the stack trace is that the error is thrown on the second attempt to access the database. #region ISiteProvider Members public void Initialise(string[] host, string basehost) { if (host[0].Contains(basehost)) host = host[0].Split('.'); Site getSite = GetSites().WithDomain(host[0]); if (getSite == null) { sites.TryGetValue(host[0], out getSite); } _site = getSite; } public Site GetCurrentSite() { return _site; } public IQueryable<Site> GetSites() { return from p in _repository.groupDomains select new Site { Host = p.domainName, GroupGuid = (Guid)p.groupGuid, IsSubDomain = p.isSubdomain }; } #endregion The Linq query ^^^ is hit first, with a filter of WithDomain, the error isn't thrown till the WithDomain filter is attempted. In summary: The error is hit after the page is redirected, so the first iteration is executing as expected (so permissions on the database are correct, user profiles etc) shortly after the redirect when it filters the database query for the possible domain/subdomain of current redirected page, it errors out.

    Read the article

  • delete row from selected gridview and database

    - by user175084
    i am trying to delete a row from the gridview and database... It should be deleted if a delte linkbutton is clicked in the gridview.. I am gettin the row index as follows: protected void LinkButton1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { LinkButton btn = (LinkButton)sender; GridViewRow row = (GridViewRow)btn.NamingContainer; if (row != null) { LinkButton LinkButton1 = (LinkButton)sender; // Get reference to the row that hold the button GridViewRow gvr = (GridViewRow)LinkButton1.NamingContainer; // Get row index from the row int rowIndex = gvr.RowIndex; string str = rowIndex.ToString(); //string str = GridView1.DataKeys[row.RowIndex].Value.ToString(); RemoveData(str); //call the delete method } } now i want to delete it... so i am having problems with this code.. i get an error Must declare the scalar variable "@original_MachineGroupName"... any suggestions private void RemoveData(string item) { SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(@"Data Source=JAGMIT-PC\SQLEXPRESS; Initial Catalog=SumooHAgentDB;Integrated Security=True"); string sql = "DELETE FROM [MachineGroups] WHERE [MachineGroupID] = @original_MachineGroupID; SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(sql, conn); cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@original_MachineGroupID", item); conn.Open(); cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); conn.Close(); } Blockquote <asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource1" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:SumooHAgentDBConnectionString %>" SelectCommand="SELECT MachineGroups.MachineGroupID, MachineGroups.MachineGroupName, MachineGroups.MachineGroupDesc, MachineGroups.TimeAdded, MachineGroups.CanBeDeleted, COUNT(Machines.MachineName) AS Expr1, DATENAME(month, (MachineGroups.TimeAdded - 599266080000000000) / 864000000000) + SPACE(1) + DATENAME(d, (MachineGroups.TimeAdded - 599266080000000000) / 864000000000) + ', ' + DATENAME(year, (MachineGroups.TimeAdded - 599266080000000000) / 864000000000) AS Expr2 FROM MachineGroups FULL OUTER JOIN Machines ON Machines.MachineGroupID = MachineGroups.MachineGroupID GROUP BY MachineGroups.MachineGroupID, MachineGroups.MachineGroupName, MachineGroups.MachineGroupDesc, MachineGroups.TimeAdded, MachineGroups.CanBeDeleted" DeleteCommand="DELETE FROM [MachineGroups] WHERE [MachineGroupID] =@original_MachineGroupID" > <DeleteParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="@original_MachineGroupID" Type="Int16" /> <asp:Parameter Name="@original_MachineGroupName" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="@original_MachineGroupDesc" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="@original_CanBeDeleted" Type="Boolean" /> <asp:Parameter Name="@original_TimeAdded" Type="Int64" /> </DeleteParameters> </asp:SqlDataSource> I still get an error : Must declare the scalar variable "@original_MachineGroupID"

    Read the article

  • SQL Insert into ... values ( SELECT ... FROM ... )

    - by Shadow_x99
    I am trying to insert into a table using the input from another table. Although this is entirely feasible for many database engines, I always seem to struggle to remember the correct syntax for the SQL-Engine of the day (MySQL, Oracle, SQLServer, Informix, DB2). I've been wondering if there is a silver-bullet syntax coming from an SQL Standards (For example, SQL92) that would allow me to insert the values without worrying about the underlying database.

    Read the article

  • Get column of a mysql entry

    - by Xelluloid
    Is there a possibility to get the name of the column a database entry belongs to? Perhaps I have three columns with column names col1, col2 and col3. Now I want to select for every column the column with the maximum entry, something like this. Select name_of_column(max(col1,col2,col3)). I know that I can ask for the name of the columns by its ordinal position in the information_schema.COLUMNS table but how do I get the ordinal position of a database entry within a table?

    Read the article

  • Persistent (purely functional) Red-Black trees on disk performance

    - by Waneck
    I'm studying the best data structures to implement a simple open-source object temporal database, and currently I'm very fond of using Persistent Red-Black trees to do it. My main reasons for using persistent data structures is first of all to minimize the use of locks, so the database can be as parallel as possible. Also it will be easier to implement ACID transactions and even being able to abstract the database to work in parallel on a cluster of some kind. The great thing of this approach is that it makes possible implementing temporal databases almost for free. And this is something quite nice to have, specially for web and for data analysis (e.g. trends). All of this is very cool, but I'm a little suspicious about the overall performance of using a persistent data structure on disk. Even though there are some very fast disks available today, and all writes can be done asynchronously, so a response is always immediate, I don't want to build all application under a false premise, only to realize it isn't really a good way to do it. Here's my line of thought: - Since all writes are done asynchronously, and using a persistent data structure will enable not to invalidate the previous - and currently valid - structure, the write time isn't really a bottleneck. - There are some literature on structures like this that are exactly for disk usage. But it seems to me that these techniques will add more read overhead to achieve faster writes. But I think that exactly the opposite is preferable. Also many of these techniques really do end up with a multi-versioned trees, but they aren't strictly immutable, which is something very crucial to justify the persistent overhead. - I know there still will have to be some kind of locking when appending values to the database, and I also know there should be a good garbage collecting logic if not all versions are to be maintained (otherwise the file size will surely rise dramatically). Also a delta compression system could be thought about. - Of all search trees structures, I really think Red-Blacks are the most close to what I need, since they offer the least number of rotations. But there are some possible pitfalls along the way: - Asynchronous writes -could- affect applications that need the data in real time. But I don't think that is the case with web applications, most of the time. Also when real-time data is needed, another solutions could be devised, like a check-in/check-out system of specific data that will need to be worked on a more real-time manner. - Also they could lead to some commit conflicts, though I fail to think of a good example of when it could happen. Also commit conflicts can occur in normal RDBMS, if two threads are working with the same data, right? - The overhead of having an immutable interface like this will grow exponentially and everything is doomed to fail soon, so this all is a bad idea. Any thoughts? Thanks! edit: There seems to be a misunderstanding of what a persistent data structure is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistent_data_structure

    Read the article

  • Good design of mapping Java Domain objects to Tables (using Hibernate)

    - by M. McKenzie
    Hey guys, I have a question that is more in the realm of design, than implementation. I'm also happy for anyone to point out resources for the answer and I'll gladly, research for myself. Highly simplified Java and SQL: Say I have a business domain POJO called 'Picture' with three attributes. class Picture int idPicture String fileName long size Say I have another business domain POJO called "Item" with 3 attributes Class Item int idItem String itemName ArrayList itemPictures These would be a normal simple relationship. You could say that 'Picture' object, will never exist outside an 'Item' object. Assume a picture belongs only to a specific item, but that an item can have multiple pictures Now - using good database design (3rd Normal Form), we know that we should put items and pictures in their own tables. Here is what I assume would be correct. table Item int idItem (primary key) String itemName table Picture int idPicture (primary key) varchar(45) fileName long size int idItem (foreign key) Here is my question: If you are making Hibernate mapping files for these objects. In the data design, your Picture table needs a column to refer to the Item, so that a foreign key relation can be maintained. However,in your business domain objects - your Picture does not hold a reference/attribute to the idItem - and does not need to know it. A java Picture instance is always instantiated inside an Item instance. If you want to know the Item that the Picture belongs to you are already in the correct scope. Call myItem.getIdItem() and myItem.getItemPictures(),and you have the two pieces of information you need. I know that Hibernate tools have a generator that can auto make your POJO's from looking at your database. My problem stems from the fact that I planned out the data design for this experiment/project first. Then when I went to make the domain java objects, I realized that good design dictated that the objects hold other objects in a nested way. This is obviously different from the way that a database schema is - where all objects(tables) are flat and hold no other complex types within them. What is a good way to reconcile this? Would you: (A) Make the hibernate mapping files so that Picture.hbm.xml has a mapping to the POJO parent's idItem Field (if it's even possible) (B) Add an int attribute in the Picture class to refer to the idItem and set it at instantiation, thus simplifying the hbm.xml mapping file by having all table fields as local attributes in the class (C) Fix the database design because it is wrong, dork. I'd truly appreciate any feedback

    Read the article

  • How a database is loaded into an application?

    - by Audel
    Hi All i need is a simple explanation on how does this function work I also attached a piece of php which I think is the one that retrieves the data from the database. Please correct me if I'm wrong Cheers. function loadDatabaseRecords () { // Mozilla/Safari if (window.XMLHttpRequest) { xmlHttpReq = new XMLHttpRequest(); } // IE else if (window.ActiveXObject) { xmlHttpReq = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } alert ("To Server (Load Records):\n\najax-open-DB.php"); xmlHttpReq.open('GET', "ajax-open-DB.php", true); xmlHttpReq.onreadystatechange = loadDatabaseRecordsCallback; xmlHttpReq.send(null); } <?php $link = mysql_connect ("ipaddress", "localhost", "password"); mysql_select_db ("database1"); $query = "SELECT * from addressbook"; $result = mysql_query ($query); print "<table>"; print "<tr>"; print "<th>Firstname</th><th>Lastname</th><th>Address</th><th>Telephone</th>"; print "</tr>"; for ($i = 0; $i < mysql_num_rows ($result); $i ++) { $row = mysql_fetch_object ($result); print "<tr>"; print "<td>$row->firstname</td>"; print "<td>$row->lastname</td>"; print "<td>$row->address</td>"; print "<td>$row->telephone</td>"; print "</tr>"; } print "</table>"; mysql_close ($link); ?>

    Read the article

  • how to connect to two databases of oracle using dblink

    - by KASHIFAMAN
    i am tring to use db link for that i have first change the name of both databases to sol1(remote) and sol3(local) then i create a db-link on sol3 CREATE DATABASE LINK SOL1.SWORLD CONNECT TO TEST IDENTIFIED BY TEST USING SOL1; LINK CREATED ON SQL / SELECT * FROM [email protected] MASSAGE SQL COULD NOT RESOLVE THE SERVICE NAME THEN I DROP THE DATABASE LINK AND CREATE A LINK FROM ORACLE ENTERPRISE SCHEMA MANAGER I CREATE A PUBLIC LINK OF FIXED USER AFTED LOGIN AND PASSWORD I ADD THE NAME IN SERVICE TAB AS SOL1 WHEN I TEST TAHT CONNECTION MASSAGE APPERAR LINK IS NOT ACTIVE

    Read the article

  • Loading the last related record instantly for multiple parent records using Entity framework

    - by Guillaume Schuermans
    Does anyone know a good approach using Entity Framework for the problem described below? I am trying for our next release to come up with a performant way to show the placed orders for the logged on customer. Of course paging is always a good technique to use when a lot of data is available I would like to see an answer without any paging techniques. Here's the story: a customer places an order which gets an orderstatus = PENDING. Depending on some strategy we move that order up the chain in order to get it APPROVED. Every change of status is logged so we can see a trace for statusses and maybe even an extra line of comment per status which can provide some extra valuable information to whoever sees this order in an interface. So an Order is linked to a Customer. One order can have multiple orderstatusses stored in OrderStatusHistory. In my testscenario I am using a customer which has 100+ Orders each with about 5 records in the OrderStatusHistory-table. I would for now like to see all orders in one page not using paging where for each Order I show the last relevant Status and the extra comment (if there is any for this last status; both fields coming from OrderStatusHistory; the record with the highest Id for the given OrderId). There are multiple scenarios I have tried, but I would like to see any potential other solutions or comments on the things I have already tried. Trying to do Include() when getting Orders but this still results in multiple queries launched on the database. Each order triggers an extra query to the database to get all orderstatusses in the history table. So all statusses are queried here instead of just returning the last relevant one, plus 100 extra queries are launched for 100 orders. You can imagine the problem when there are 100000+ orders in the database. Having 2 computed columns on the database: LastStatus, LastStatusInformation and a regular Linq-Query which gets those columns which are available through the Entity-model. The problem with this approach is the fact that those computed columns are determined using a scalar function which can not be changed without removing the formula from the computed column, etc... In the end I am very familiar with SQL and Stored procedures, but since the rest of the data-layer uses Entity Framework I would like to stick to it as long as possible, even though I have my doubts about performance. Using the SQL approach I would write something like this: WITH cte (RN, OrderId, [Status], Information) AS ( SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY OrderId ORDER BY Id DESC), OrderId, [Status], Information FROM OrderStatus ) SELECT o.Id, cte.[Status], cte.Information AS StatusInformation, o.* FROM [Order] o INNER JOIN cte ON o.Id = cte.OrderId AND cte.RN = 1 WHERE CustomerId = @CustomerId ORDER BY 1 DESC; which returns all orders for the customer with the statusinformation provided by the Common Table Expression. Does anyone know a good approach using Entity Framework?

    Read the article

  • displaying data from database in to text box

    - by srinayak
    I have 2 JSP pages as below: projectcategory.jsp <% Connection con = DbConnect.connect(); Statement s = con.createStatement(); ResultSet rs = s.executeQuery("select * from projectcategory"); %> <DIV class="TabbedPanelsContent" align="center"> <TABLE border="1"> <TR> <TH>CATEGORY ID</TH> <TH>CATEGORY NAME</TH> <TH>Edit/Update</TH> </TR> <% while (rs.next()) { %> <%String p=rs.getString(1);%> <TR> <TD><%=rs.getString(1)%></TD> <TD><%=rs.getString(2)%></TD> <TD> <FORM action="EditPcat.jsp?pcatid=p"><INPUT type="submit" value='edit/update'></INPUT> </FORM> </TD> </TR> <% } %> </TABLE> </DIV> another is Editpcat.jsp: </head> <body> <%String s=request.getParameter("p"); %> <form action="ProjCatServlet" method="post"> <div align="right"><a href="projectcategory.jsp">view</a></div> <fieldset> <legend>Edit category</legend> <table cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" border="0"> <tr> <td align="left">Category Id</td> <td><input type="text" name="pcatid" value="<%=s%>" ></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right">Category Name</td> <td><input type="text" name="pcatname"></td> </tr> <tr> <td><input type="submit" value="submit"></td> </tr> </table> <input type="hidden" name="FUNCTION_ID" value="UPDATE"> </fieldset> </form> How to display value from one JSP page which we get from database in to text box of another JSP?

    Read the article

  • Problems with MYSQL database

    - by shinjuo
    I have a database that worked fine until I decided to add a log onto the page. here is what I have now: <body> <?php if($_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] == 'POST') { require("serverInfo.php"); mysql_query("UPDATE `cardLists` SET `AmountLeft` = `AmountLeft` + ".mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['Add'])." WHERE `cardID` = '".mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['Cards'])."'"); echo "\"" .$_POST['Add'] ."\" has been added to the inventory amount for the card \"". $_POST['Cards']. "\""; mysql_query("INSERT INTO `log` (`changes`, `amount`, `cardID`, `person`, Date)VALUES('ADDED','$_POST['Add']','$_POST['Cards']', '$_POST['Person']', NOW())"); mysql_close($link); } ?> <form action="<?php echo $_SERVER['PHP_SELF']; ?>" method="post"> <?php require("serverInfo.php"); ?> <?php $res = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM cardLists order by cardID") or die(mysql_error()); echo "<select name = 'Cards'>"; while($row=mysql_fetch_assoc($res)) { echo "<option value=\"$row[cardID]\">$row[cardID]</option>"; } echo "</select>"; ?> Amount to Add: <input type="text" name="Add" maxlength="8" /> Changes Made By: <select name="Person"> <option value="justin">Justin</option> <option value="chris">Chris</option> <option value="matt">Matt</option> <option value="dan">Dan</option> <option value="tim">Tim</option> <option value="amanda">Amanda</option> </select> <input type="submit" name ="submit" onClick= "return confirm( 'Are you sure you want to add this amount?');"> </form> <br /> <input type="button" name="main" value="Return To Main" onclick="window.location.href='index.php';" /> </body> </html> it works fine until I added the: mysql_query("INSERT INTO `log` (`changes`, `amount`, `cardID`, `person`, Date)VALUES('ADDED','$_POST['Add']','$_POST['Cards']', '$_POST['Person']', NOW())"); mysql_close($link); Can anyone see what is going on?

    Read the article

  • Error with connection in my database servlet

    - by Zerobu
    Hello, I am writing a Database servlet, all seems well except that there seems to be an error in my connection import java.io.IOException; import java.sql.Connection; import java.sql.DriverManager; import java.sql.PreparedStatement; import java.sql.ResultSet; import java.sql.SQLException; import java.sql.Statement; import java.util.ArrayList; import javax.servlet.RequestDispatcher; import javax.servlet.ServletContext; import javax.servlet.ServletException; import javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet; import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest; import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse; public class DBServlet3 extends HttpServlet { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; @Override public void init() throws ServletException { super.init(); try { String jdbcDriverClass= getServletContext().getInitParameter( "jdbcDriverClass" ); if (jdbcDriverClass == null) throw new ServletException( "Could not find jdbcDriverClass initialization parameter" ); Class.forName( jdbcDriverClass ); } catch (ClassNotFoundException e) { throw new ServletException( "Could not load JDBC driver class", e ); } } @Override protected void doGet( HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response ) throws ServletException, IOException { RequestDispatcher dispatcher= request.getRequestDispatcher( "/db.jsp" ); ServletContext application= getServletContext(); ArrayList<String> names= new ArrayList<String>(); try { Connection connection= null; Statement statement= null; ResultSet results= null; try { String jdbcUrl= application.getInitParameter( "jdbcUrl" ); String jdbcUser= application.getInitParameter( "jdbcUser" ); String jdbcPassword= application.getInitParameter( "jdbcPassword" ); connection= DriverManager.getConnection( jdbcUrl, jdbcUser, jdbcPassword ); statement= connection.createStatement(); results= statement.executeQuery( "SELECT * FROM students" ); while (results.next()) { String name= results.getString( "name" ); names.add( name ); } } finally { if (results != null) results.close(); if (statement != null) statement.close(); if (connection != null) connection.close(); } } catch (SQLException e) { throw new ServletException( e ); } request.setAttribute( "names", names ); dispatcher.forward( request, response ); } @Override protected void doPost( HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response ) throws ServletException, IOException { String sql= "INSERT INTO students VALUES (" + request.getParameter( "id" ) + ", '" + request.getParameter( "name" ) + "')"; sql= "INSERT INTO students VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)"; PreparedStatement statement= connection.prepareStatement( sql ); //error on this line statement.setString( 1, request.getParameter( "id" ) ); statement.setString( 2, request.getParameter( "name" ) ); } }

    Read the article

  • Different information domains in DB

    - by dotnetdev
    Hi, I have a database for my personal site and at the moment it is storing different domains of information (Eg cv, CMS schema, and more, all in one DB). I have noticed that sets of tables (eg all for one domain) have no relationship to other groups of tables as they are completely unrelated. What implication does this have on database design? I can assume this is a time I need to think about having 1 DB.

    Read the article

  • 50 million+ Rows of Data - CSV or MySQL

    - by eWizardII
    Hello, I have a CSV file which is about 1GB big and contains about 50million rows of data, I am wondering is it better to keep it as a CSV file or store it as some form of a database. I don't know a great deal about MySQL to argue for why I should use it or another database framework over just keeping it as a CSV file. I am basically doing a Breadth-First Search with this dataset, so once I get the initial "seed" set the 50million I use this as the first values in my queue. Thanks,

    Read the article

  • How to get data source for Spring Security Web in Java code

    - by user1443689
    I'm creating a ZK Web application which uses Spring Security for authentication and I'm trying to implement a create user function, where the administrator supplies the details and the user account is created. I've got to the part where I want to put this data into the database, but now I'm thinking I shouldn't hard code the connection to the database, there must be a way to get the connection details from the Spring Security configuration. Is there? If so how?

    Read the article

  • How many objects can LINQ used to create per second ?

    - by MemoryLeak
    I used Linq to insert objects into database.But if i used threads to simultanously create 20 object within 1 second, then system will fail to add 20 objects into database. And I found it is not because of the sql server 's limit. so the only possible is Linq, any one have idea ? How can I create 20 records or more in 1 second within 1 second ?

    Read the article

  • Generate data for an application

    - by Duncan Benoit
    Hi there If your planing to build an application but you don't have enough data to fill a database, how you will generate some ? Do you know any application which can generate data based on some criterias and export it later in MySQL database? Thanks :)

    Read the article

  • JPA Database strcture for internationalisation

    - by IrishDubGuy
    I am trying to get a JPA implementation of a simple approach to internationalisation. I want to have a table of translated strings that I can reference in multiple fields in multiple tables. So all text occurrences in all tables will be replaced by a reference to the translated strings table. In combination with a language id, this would give a unique row in the translated strings table for that particular field. For example, consider a schema that has entities Course and Module as follows :- Course int course_id, int name, int description Module int module_id, int name The course.name, course.description and module.name are all referencing the id field of the translated strings table :- TranslatedString int id, String lang, String content That all seems simple enough. I get one table for all strings that could be internationalised and that table is used across all the other tables. How might I do this in JPA, using eclipselink 2.4? I've looked at embedded ElementCollection, ala this... JPA 2.0: Mapping a Map - it isn't exactly what i'm after cos it looks like it is relating the translated strings table to the pk of the owning table. This means I can only have one translatable string field per entity (unless I add new join columns into the translatable strings table, which defeats the point, its the opposite of what I am trying to do). I'm also not clear on how this would work across entites, presumably the id of each entity would have to use a database wide sequence to ensure uniqueness of the translatable strings table. BTW, I tried the example as laid out in that link and it didn't work for me - as soon as the entity had a localizedString map added, persisting it caused the client side to bomb but no obvious error on the server side and nothing persisted in the DB :S I been around the houses on this about 9 hours so far, I've looked at this Internationalization with Hibernate which appears to be trying to do the same thing as the link above (without the table definitions it hard to see what he achieved). Any help would be gratefully achieved at this point... Edit 1 - re AMS anwser below, I'm not sure that really addresses the issue. In his example it leaves the storing of the description text to some other process. The idea of this type of approach is that the entity object takes the text and locale and this (somehow!) ends up in the translatable strings table. In the first link I gave, the guy is attempting to do this by using an embedded map, which I feel is the right approach. His way though has two issues - one it doesn't seem to work! and two if it did work, it is storing the FK in the embedded table instead of the other way round (I think, I can't get it to run so I can't see exactly how it persists). I suspect the correct approach ends up with a map reference in place of each text that needs translating (the map being locale-content), but I can't see how to do this in a way that allows for multiple maps in one entity (without having corresponding multiple columns in the translatable strings table)...

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246  | Next Page >