Search Results

Search found 32512 results on 1301 pages for 'object oriented analysis'.

Page 256/1301 | < Previous Page | 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263  | Next Page >

• django integrate htmls into templates

  - by dana

  hi guys, i have a django 'templating' question if i have in views.py: def cv(request): if request.user.is_authenticated(): cv = OpenCv.objects.filter(created_by=request.user) return render_to_response('cv/cv.html', { 'object_list': cv, }, context_instance=RequestContext(request)) and in cv.html something like: {% for object in object_list %} First Name {{ object.first_name }} Last Name {{ object.last_name }} Url {{object.url}} Picture {{object.picture}} Bio {{object.bio}} Date of birth {{object.date_birth}} {% endfor %} but i want this content to appear on the profile.html page too, how can i do it? a smple {% include cv.html %} in the profile.html doesn't work. Also, is there another way to 'parse the object list' than explicitly write all the objects, like above? thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• Access of private field of another object in copy constructors - Really a problem?

  - by DR

  In my Java application I have some copy-constructors like this public MyClass(MyClass src) { this.field1 = src.field1; this.field2 = src.field2; this.field3 = src.field3; ... } Now Netbeans 6.9 warns about this and I wonder what is wrong with this code? My concerns: Using the getters might introduce unwanted side-effects. The new object might no longer be considered a copy of the original. If it is recommended using the getters, wouldn't it be more consistent if one would use setters for the new instance as well?

  Read the article

• How do you resolve the common naming collision between type and object?

  - by Catskul

  Since the standard c# convention is to capitalize the first letter of public properties, the old c++ convention of initial capital for type names, and initial lowercase for non-type names does not prevent the classic name collision where the most obvious object name matches the type name: class FooManager { public BarManager BarManager { get; set; } // Feels very wrong. // Recommended naming convention? public int DoIt() { // 1st and 2nd Bar Manager are different symbols return BarManager.Blarb + BarManager.StaticBlarb; } } class BarManager { public int Blarb { get; set; } public static int StaticBlarb { get; set; } } It seems to compile, but feels so wrong. Is there a recommend naming convention to avoid this?

  Read the article

• How to get jSon object in servlet from jsp?

  - by divi

  In jsp page i have written: var sel = document.getElementById("Wimax"); var ip = sel.options[sel.selectedIndex].value; var param; var url = 'ConfigurationServlet?ActionID=Configuration_Physical_Get'; httpRequest = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); httpRequest.open("POST", url, true); httpRequest.onreadystatechange = handler(){ if (httpRequest.readyState == 4) { if (httpRequest.status == 200) { param = 'ip='+ip; param += 'mmv='+mmv; param += "tab="+tab; }}; httpRequest.send(param); i want this param variable in my configurationServlet. Can any one tel me how to get this json object in servlet???

  Read the article

• C++ - Where to code a member function for an inherited object.

  - by Francisco P.

  Hello! I have a few classes (heat, gas, contact, pressure) inheriting from a main one (sensor). I have a need to store them in a vector<Sensor *> (part of the specification). At some point in time, I need to call a function that indiscriminately stores those Sensor *. (also part of the specification, not open for discussion) Something like this: for(size_t i = 0; i < Sensors.size(); ++i) Sensors[i]->storeSensor(os) //os is an ofstream kind of object, passed onwards by reference Where and how shall storeSensor be defined? Is there any simple way to do this or will I need to disregard the specification? Mind you, I'm a beginner! Thanks for your time!

  Read the article

• C# - What is root reference ?

  - by DotNetGuy

  class GCTest { static Object r1; static void Main() { r1 = new Object(); Object r2 = new Object(); Object r3 = new Object(); System.GC.Collect(); // what can be reclaimed here ? r1 = null; r3.ToString(); System.GC.Collect(); // what can be reclaimed here ? } } // code from - DonBox's Essential .Net

  Read the article

• Counting array in API JSON Response

  - by bryan

  I'm trying to do a simple count of how many refunds are in my Stripe Response but count() isn't working and I don't really know any other way of achieving this. Could anyone point me in the right direction? $retrieve_event = Stripe_Event::retrieve("evt_00000000000000"); $event_json_id = json_decode($retrieve_event); $refund_array = $event_json_id->{'data'}->{'object'}->{'refunds'}; die(count($refund_array)); This is the response of $retrieve_event { "created": 1326853478, "livemode": false, "id": "evt_00000000000000", "type": "charge.refunded", "object": "event", "request": null, "data": { "object": { "id": "ch_00000000000000", "object": "charge", "created": 1402433517, "livemode": false, "paid": true, "amount": 1000, "currency": "usd", "refunded": true, "card": { "id": "card_00000000000000", "object": "card", "last4": "0028", "type": "Visa", "exp_month": 8, "exp_year": 2015, "fingerprint": "a5KWlTcrmCYk5DIYa", "country": "US", "name": "First Last", "address_line1": "null", "address_line2": null, "address_city": "null", "address_state": "null", "address_zip": "null", "address_country": "US", "cvc_check": null, "address_line1_check": "fail", "address_zip_check": "pass", "customer": "cus_00000000000000" }, "captured": true, "refunds": [ { "id": "re_104CKt4uGeYuVLAahMwLA2TK", "amount": 100, "currency": "usd", "created": 1402433533, "object": "refund", "charge": "ch_104CKt4uGeYuVLAazSyPqqLV", "balance_transaction": "txn_104CKt4uGeYuVLAaSNZCR867", "metadata": {} }, { "id": "re_104CKt4uGeYuVLAaDIMHoIos", "amount": 200, "currency": "usd", "created": 1402433539, "object": "refund", "charge": "ch_104CKt4uGeYuVLAazSyPqqLV", "balance_transaction": "txn_104CKt4uGeYuVLAaqSwkNKPO", "metadata": {} }, { "id": "re_4CL6n1r91dY5ME", "amount": 700, "currency": "usd", "created": 1402434306, "object": "refund", "charge": "ch_4CL6FNWhGzVuAV", "balance_transaction": "txn_4CL6qa4vwlVaDJ" } ], "balance_transaction": "txn_00000000000000", "failure_message": null, "failure_code": null, "amount_refunded": 1000, "customer": "cus_00000000000000", "invoice": null, "description": "this is a description", "dispute": null, "metadata": {}, "statement_description": "this is a description", "fee": 0 } } }

  Read the article

• Java - What's the most efficient way of removing a set of elements from an Array[]

  - by fraido

  I've something like this Object[] myObjects = ...(initialized in some way)... int[] elemToRemove = new int[]{3,4,6,8,...} What's the most efficient way of removing the elements of index position 3,4,6,8... from myObjects ? I'd like to implement an efficient Utility method with a signature like public Object[] removeElements(Object[] object, int[] elementsToRemove) {...} The Object[] that is returned should be a new Object of size myObjects.length - elemToRemove.length

  Read the article

• What is the pythonic way to add type information to an object's attributes?

  - by Tikitu

  I'm building classes where I know the types of the attributes, but Python of course doesn't. While it's un-pythonic to want to tell it, supposing I do want to, is there an idiomatic way to do so? Why: I'm reading in serialised data (without type information) involving objects-nested-inside-objects. It's easy to put it into nested dictionaries, but I want it in objects of my class-types, to get the right behaviours as well as the data. For instance: suppose my class Book has an attribute isbn which I will fill with an ISBNumber object. My serialised data gives me the isbn as a string; I would like to be able to look at Book and say "That field should be filled by ISBNumber(theString)." Bonus glee for me if the solution can be applied to classes I get from someone else without editing their code.

  Read the article

• Setting custom HTTP request headers in an URL object doesn't work.

  - by Blagovest Buyukliev

  I am trying to fetch an image from an IP camera using HTTP. The camera requires HTTP basic authentication, so I have to add the corresponding request header: URL url = new URL("http://myipcam/snapshot.jpg"); URLConnection uc = url.openConnection(); uc.setRequestProperty("Authorization", "Basic " + new String(Base64.encode("user:pass".getBytes()))); // outputs "null" System.out.println(uc.getRequestProperty("Authorization")); I am later passing the url object to ImageIO.read(), and, as you can guess, I am getting an HTTP 401 Unauthorized, although user and pass are correct. What am I doing wrong? I've also tried new URL("http://user:pass@myipcam/snapshot.jpg"), but that doesn't work either.

  Read the article

• How can I access the int values of an object in an NSMutableArray?

  - by Daniel

  I try to access some values in a NSMutableArray I created, but I only get some numbers (address?) if I try to access them. I was able to initialize an array and can add and change objects with [myNSMutableArray addObject:[NSNumber numberWithInt:10]] and [myNSMutableArray replaceObjectAtIndex:0 withObject:[NSNumber numberWithInt:47] I also can print the value at index [0] with NSLog(@"%@", [myNSMutableArray objectAtIndex:0]); and I get 47 as expected. But how can I access the integer value of the object in the array so I can save it tomyIntValue?

  Read the article

• Which Java library lets me initialize an object's properties from a properties file?

  - by Kjetil Ødegaard

  Is there a Java library that lets you "deserialize" a properties file directly into an object instance? Example: say you have a file called init.properties: username=fisk password=frosk and a Java class with some properties: class Connection { private String username; private String password; public void setUsername(String username) { this.username = username; } public void setPassword(String password) { this.password = password; } } I want to do this: Connection c = MagicConfigurator.configure("init.properties", new Connection()) and have MagicConfigurator apply all the values from the properties file to the Connection instance. Is there a library with a class like this?

  Read the article

• In a C++ template, is it allowed to return an object with spesific type parameters?

  - by nieldw

  When I've got a template with certain type parameters, is it allowed for a function to return an object of this same template, but with different types? In other words, is the following allowed? template<class edgeDecor, class vertexDecor, bool dir> Graph<edgeDecor,int,dir> Graph<edgeDecor,vertexDecor,dir>::Dijkstra(vertex s, bool print = false) const { /* Construct new Graph with apropriate decorators */ Graph<edgeDecor,int,dir> span = new Graph<edgeDecor,int,dir>(); /* ... */ return span; }; If this is not allowed, how can I accomplish the same kind of thing?

  Read the article

• What is root reference ?

  - by DotNetGuy

  class GCTest { static Object r1; static void Main() { r1 = new Object(); Object r2 = new Object(); Object r3 = new Object(); System.GC.Collect(); // what can be reclaimed here ? r1 = null; r3.ToString(); System.GC.Collect(); // what can be reclaimed here ? } } // code from - DonBox's Essential .Net

  Read the article

• Javascript: How to filter object array based on attributes?

  - by JGreig

  I have the following JavaScript JSON array of real estate home objects: var json = { 'homes' : [ { "home_id":"1", "price":"925", "sqft":"1100", "num_of_beds":"2", "num_of_baths":"2.0", }, { "home_id":"2", "price":"1425", "sqft":"1900", "num_of_beds":"4", "num_of_baths":"2.5", }, // ... (more homes) ... ]} var xmlhttp = eval('(' + json + ')'); homes = xmlhttp.homes; What I would like to do is be able to perform a filter on the object to return a subset of "home" objects. For example, I want to be able to filter based on: price, sqft, num_of_beds, and num_of_baths. Question: How can I perform something in javascript like the pseudo-code below: var newArray = homes.filter( price <= 1000 & sqft >= 500 & num_of_beds >=2 & num_of_baths >= 2.5); Note, the syntax does not have to be exactly like above. This is just an example.

  Read the article

• Fetch a Rails ActiveRecord 'datetime' attribute as a DateTime object.

  - by Tobias Cohen

  I have an attribute in one of my models that contains a Date/Time value, and is declared using t.datetime :ended_on in my migrations. When I fetch this value using myevent.ended_on, I get a Time object. The problem is that when I try to use this attribute as an axis in a Flotilla chart, it doesn't work properly because Flotilla only recognizes dates as Date or DateTime objects. I thought about writing a virtual attribute that will convert the existing Time value to a DateTime, but I'm wary of doing this, since I've heard that Time can't handle dates later than 2040, and I don't wish to risk creating a "2040 bug" to worry about later. Is there any way I can persuade ActiveRecord to return DateTime objects for this attribute instead of Time objects?

  Read the article

• how do you get the response back into the instance of the object?

  - by randomdev

  If you've written a class in JavaScript that calls a remote service's API, and that remote API offers a callback, how do you get the response back into the instance of the object that made the request? I'll try to give you a very basic example FOO for making cross domain calls to BAR service which offers a callback. Please ignore the usual security concerns, (I own both servers). function FOO() { this.response = null; this.execute = function(url) { var script = document.createElement('script'); script.src = url; document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(script); } this.catch = function(response) { this.response = response; } } var sample = new FOO(); sample.execute('http://barservices.com/sample/?callback={ plshelphere: this.catch}'); I have a way to make this work, but I'm curious if there is an "accepted approach" here. Anyone have thoughts for me?

  Read the article

• Is it possible to supply the jQuery Validation plugin with a rules object?

  - by ethagnawl

  I took the rules that I'd been using to validate my form and broke them out into a JSON object, hoping to use the same set of rules for client/server validation. So, where I had: $(document.getElementById('new_listing_form')).validate({ rules: { apt: { required: true } } }); I'm attempting to use: var rules_obj = { apt: { required: true } }; $(document.getElementById('new_listing_form')).validate({ rules: rules_obj }); ... and the form is not being validated. Does anyone know if this is possible?

  Read the article

• transforming flat php array into multidimensional one based on key value?

  - by PopRocks4344

  I have a flat array that I'm trying to make multidimensional. Basically, I want to find the items that have parents and create a subarray for that parent id. Right now (and this is simplified), it looks like this: Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [id] => 1 [parent] => 0 [name ] => Parent1 ) [1] => stdClass Object ( [id] => 7 [parent] => 1 [name] => Child1 ) [2] => stdClass Object ( [id] => 9 [parent] => 1 [name] => Child2 ) [3] => stdClass Object ( [id] => 2 [parent] => 0 [name ] => Parent2 ) [4] => stdClass Object ( [id] => 88 [parent] => 2 [name] => Childof2 ) ) I'm trying to make this: Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [id] => 1 [parent] => 0 [name ] => Parent1 [children] => stdClass Object ( [1] => stdClass Object ( [id] => 7 [parent] => 1 [name] => Child1 ) [2] => stdClass Object ( [id] => 9 [parent] => 1 [name] => Child2 ) ) ) [1] => stdClass Object ( [id] => 2 [parent] => 0 [name ] => Parent2 [children] => stdClass Object ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [id] => 88 [parent] => 2 [name] => Childof2 ) ) ) )

  Read the article

• How to select parent object of a hyperlink whose href match the requested page/file name using jQuer

  - by ARS

  How to select parent object of a hyperlink whose href match the requested page/file name using jQuery? I have following code <div> <div class="menu-head"> <a href="empdet.aspx">employees</a> <a href="custdet.aspx">customers</a> </div> <div class="menu-head"> <a href="depdet.aspx">departments</a> </div> <div> I want a Jquery to change the color of the parent div corresponding a hyperlink. If the user is browsing custdet.aspx the respective parent div background should be changed to red. Edit: I have a method to retrieve the file name. I just need the right selector to select the parent.

  Read the article

• When can we mock an object and its methods?

  - by Shailendra

  I am novice to the Moq and unit testing. I have to write unit tests to a lot of classes which has the objects of other classes. can i mock the methods of the class objects. Here is the exact scenerio- I have a class two classes A and B and A has a private object of B and in a method of A i am internally calling the method of B and then doing some calculation and returning the result. Can i mock the method of B in this scenerio? Please try to give me full detail about the conditions where i can mock the methods and functions of the class. Thanx

  Read the article

• Do we need to release an UIImage object even not allocated memory?

  - by Madan Mohan

  Hi Guys, I added an image to button UIImage* deleteImage = [UIImage imageNamed:@"Delete.png"]; CGRect imageFrame=CGRectMake(-4,-4, 310, 55); [btn setFrame:imageFrame]; btn.backgroundColor=[UIColor clearColor]; [btn setBackgroundImage:deleteImage forState:UIControlStateNormal]; [btn setTitle:@"Delete" forState:UIControlStateNormal]; [btn addTarget:self action:@selector(editDeleteAction) forControlEvents:UIControlEventTouchUpInside]; [elementView addSubview:btn]; [deleteImage release];// do we need to release the image here If I release here its working fine but in object allocations no.of image count is increasing.

  Read the article

• Java: How to check if a date Object equals yesterday?

  - by tzippy

  Right now I am using this code Calendar cal = Calendar.getInstance(); SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd"); cal.set(cal.get(Calendar.YEAR), cal.get(Calendar.MONTH), cal.get(Calendar.DATE) - 1, 12, 0, 0); //Sets Calendar to "yeserday, 12am" if(sdf.format(getDateFromLine(line)).equals(sdf.format(cal.getTime()))) //getDateFromLine() returns a Date Object that is always at 12pm {...CODE There's got to be a smoother way to check if the date returned by getdateFromLine() is yesterday's date. Only the date matters, not the time. That's why I used SimpleDateFormat. Thanks for your help in advance!

  Read the article

• Dictionary w/ null key?

  - by Ralph

  Firstly, why doesn't Dictionary<TKey, TValue> support a single null key? Secondly, is there an existing dictionary-like collection that does? I want to store an "empty" or "missing" or "default" System.Type, thought null would work well for this. More specifically, I've written this class: class Switch { private Dictionary<Type, Action<object>> _dict; public Switch(params KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>[] cases) { _dict = new Dictionary<Type, Action<object>>(cases.Length); foreach (var entry in cases) _dict.Add(entry.Key, entry.Value); } public void Execute(object obj) { var type = obj.GetType(); if (_dict.ContainsKey(type)) _dict[type](obj); } public static void Execute(object obj, params KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>[] cases) { var type = obj.GetType(); foreach (var entry in cases) { if (entry.Key == null || type.IsAssignableFrom(entry.Key)) { entry.Value(obj); break; } } } public static KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>> Case<T>(Action action) { return new KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>(typeof(T), x => action()); } public static KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>> Case<T>(Action<T> action) { return new KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>(typeof(T), x => action((T)x)); } public static KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>> Default(Action action) { return new KeyValuePair<Type, Action<object>>(null, x => action()); } } For switching on types. There are two ways to use it: Statically. Just call Switch.Execute(yourObject, Switch.Case<YourType>(x => x.Action())) Precompiled. Create a switch, and then use it later with switchInstance.Execute(yourObject) Works great except when you try to add a default case to the "precompiled" version (null argument exception).

  Read the article

• How to reserve public API to internal usage in .NET?

  - by mark

  Dear ladies and sirs. Let me first present the case, which will explain my question. This is going to be a bit long, so I apologize in advance :-). I have objects and collections, which should support the Merge API (it is my custom API, the signature of which is immaterial for this question). This API must be internal, meaning only my framework should be allowed to invoke it. However, derived types should be able to override the basic implementation. The natural way to implement this pattern as I see it, is this: The Merge API is declared as part of some internal interface, let us say IMergeable. Because the interface is internal, derived types would not be able to implement it directly. Rather they must inherit it from a common base type. So, a common base type is introduced, which would implement the IMergeable interface explicitly, where the interface methods delegate to respective protected virtual methods, providing the default implementation. This way the API is only callable by my framework, but derived types may override the default implementation. The following code snippet demonstrates the concept: internal interface IMergeable { void Merge(object obj); } public class BaseFrameworkObject : IMergeable { protected virtual void Merge(object obj) { // The default implementation. } void IMergeable.Merge(object obj) { Merge(obj); } } public class SomeThirdPartyObject : BaseFrameworkObject { protected override void Merge(object obj) { // A derived type implementation. } } All is fine, provided a single common base type suffices, which is usually true for non collection types. The thing is that collections must be mergeable as well. Collections do not play nicely with the presented concept, because developers do not develop collections from the scratch. There are predefined implementations - observable, filtered, compound, read-only, remove-only, ordered, god-knows-what, ... They may be developed from scratch in-house, but once finished, they serve wide range of products and should never be tailored to some specific product. Which means, that either: they do not implement the IMergeable interface at all, because it is internal to some product the scope of the IMergeable interface is raised to public and the API becomes open and callable by all. Let us refer to these collections as standard collections. Anyway, the first option screws my framework, because now each possible standard collection type has to be paired with the respective framework version, augmenting the standard with the IMergeable interface implementation - this is so bad, I am not even considering it. The second option breaks the framework as well, because the IMergeable interface should be internal for a reason (whatever it is) and now this interface has to open to all. So what to do? My solution is this. make IMergeable public API, but add an extra parameter to the Merge method, I call it a security token. The interface implementation may check that the token references some internal object, which is never exposed to the outside. If this is the case, then the method was called from within the framework, otherwise - some outside API consumer attempted to invoke it and so the implementation can blow up with a SecurityException. Here is the modified code snippet demonstrating this concept: internal static class InternalApi { internal static readonly object Token = new object(); } public interface IMergeable { void Merge(object obj, object token); } public class BaseFrameworkObject : IMergeable { protected virtual void Merge(object obj) { // The default implementation. } public void Merge(object obj, object token) { if (!object.ReferenceEquals(token, InternalApi.Token)) { throw new SecurityException("bla bla bla"); } Merge(obj); } } public class SomeThirdPartyObject : BaseFrameworkObject { protected override void Merge(object obj) { // A derived type implementation. } } Of course, this is less explicit than having an internally scoped interface and the check is moved from the compile time to run time, yet this is the best I could come up with. Now, I have a gut feeling that there is a better way to solve the problem I have presented. I do not know, may be using some standard Code Access Security features? I have only vague understanding of it, but can LinkDemand attribute be somehow related to it? Anyway, I would like to hear other opinions. Thanks.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263  | Next Page >