Search Results

Search found 59326 results on 2374 pages for 'full text search'.

Page 27/2374 | < Previous Page | 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34  | Next Page >

  • New blog post shows immediately in google search results where as other HTML content takes time, why?

    - by Jayapal Chandran
    I have a blog which has been active for 3 years. Recently I posted an article and it immediately appeared in google search. Maybe 5 to 10 minutes. A point to note is I was logged into my google account. Maybe google checked my post's when I searched since I am logged in? Yet I logged out and used another browser and searched again with that specific text and it appeared in google search result. How did this happen? However, if I make an article in static HTML and publish, it takes time. (I assume this is the case but I haven't tested much). Yet tested a few cases after updating it in my sitemap xml. How does google search work for a blog and other content?

    Read the article

  • when google search gives incorrect results - how can it be reported?

    - by vgv8
    If google search query results are incorrect: How can it be reported? What is the procedure to correct it? @Lèse majesté: Incorrect results are the results that do not contain any of the searched keywords in them like in this my question @John Conde, yes I believe it is the right defitition. @DisgruntedGoat, even when there are a lot of results by keycaptcha for "Past 24 hours", the Google.com presents results only on reCAPTCHA. Anyway, they are different from those by google if to search by "keycaptcha" (in quotes) and by other search engines. Everybody thinks that searches by one keyword should be sneakily substituted by google's own promoted brand products?

    Read the article

  • Dolphin Search Toolbar is missing its text field. How can I get it back?

    - by Ike
    A while ago, my Search Toolbar bar went missing in dolphin. I'm referring to the Search Toolbar found under SettingsToolbars ShownSearch Toolbar. I used to sit at the very top right corner of the window. If the search toolbar is checked for view/unhide, the toolbar looks to activate something, as there is a slight shift in the interface buttons, but the text field is gone from the toolbar. I tried reconfiguring with dpkg, purging and reinstalling, etc. I left it alone as I thought it would be fixed in an update, but today I upgraded dolphin and it's still gone. This appears to be a 4.6 bug or something. Any thoughts?

    Read the article

  • Advanced searching in Tracker Search Tool? Filter by folders?

    - by UrkoM
    Hi, I have checked several "Tracker Search Tool" questions, but they all stop at very superficial usage. Google, at least for me, didn't turn out anything either. Here is my situation: I have a lot of documents, and I want to index them all, and do fulltext searching on them. I have organized them by folders in advance, and sometimes I want to search across all subfolders, sometimes only in a specific subfolders. Is there any way to do it? Right now, I am changing the locations in the search preferences and triggering a hard-reset of the Tracker database, but that's far from ideal. I am using Maverick, 10.10.

    Read the article

  • How to implement full text search in Django?

    - by Jannis
    I would like to implement a search function in a django blogging application. The status quo is that I have a list of strings supplied by the user and the queryset is narrowed down by each string to include only those objects that match the string. See: if request.method == "POST": form = SearchForm(request.POST) if form.is_valid(): posts = Post.objects.all() for string in form.cleaned_data['query'].split(): posts = posts.filter( Q(title__icontains=string) | Q(text__icontains=string) | Q(tags__name__exact=string) ) return archive_index(request, queryset=posts, date_field='date') Now, what if I didn't want do concatenate each word that is searched for by a logical AND but with a logical OR? How would I do that? Is there a way to do that with Django's own Queryset methods or does one have to fall back to raw SQL queries? In general, is it a proper solution to do full text search like this or would you recommend using a search engine like Solr, Whoosh or Xapian. What are there benefits? Thanks for taking the time

    Read the article

  • What would be the most efficient way to do this search (mysql or text)?

    - by alex
    Suppose I have 500 rows of data, each with a paragraph of text (like this paragraph). That's it.I want to do a search that is not only based on words. (%LIKE%, not FULL_TEXT) What would be faster? SELECT * FROM ...WHERE LIKE "%query%"; This would put load on the database server. Select all. Then, go through each one and do .find = 0 This would put load on the web server. This is a website, and people will be searching frequently.

    Read the article

  • Windows 7: Search indexing is stuck

    - by Ricket
    When I open Indexing Options, it says: 4,317 items indexed Indexing in progress. Search results might not be complete during this time. It's stuck at 4,317 though; no more items have been indexed. Worst of all, SearchIndexer.exe is taking up 100% CPU (well, 50%, but I have a dual core CPU; it's taking up all processing power it can). It is not causing hard drive activity though. I tried clicking "Troubleshoot search and indexing" at the bottom of the Indexing Options window, but it couldn't find any problem. I've also tried the repair registry key that several websites suggest; I change HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows Search SetupCompletedSuccessfully to 0 and restarted the computer, and it apparently repaired because it flipped back to 1, but the same problem continues to occur. It's reducing the battery life of my laptop and making it really hot so that my fans are running all the time. I've had to disable the Windows Search service. How can I fix this? Do I need to just flat-out reformat my computer? Update: I've tried rebuilding a couple times. There's nothing unusual about the locations I have to index, and I don't have any downloads in progress or anything like that. I don't see any reason why it stopped, and I noticed it much too late to do a system restore. At this point, I'm hoping someone will offer up some secret answer that will fix the problem, thus the bounty. Another update: I tried starting the service again, just to let it try yet again. It seemed okay at first (Indexing Options showed it operating at reduced speed due to user activity, and the number of files was going up). A while later I checked, and the service had stopped. Event viewer revealed some errors like this: Log Name: Application Source: Application Error Date: 2/1/2010 7:34:23 PM Event ID: 1000 Task Category: (100) Level: Error Keywords: Classic User: N/A Computer: ricky-win7 Description: Faulting application name: SearchIndexer.exe, version: 7.0.7600.16385, time stamp: 0x4a5bcdd0 Faulting module name: NLSData0007.dll, version: 6.1.7600.16385, time stamp: 0x4a5bda88 Exception code: 0xc0000005 Fault offset: 0x002141ba Faulting process id: 0x13a0 Faulting application start time: 0x01caa39f2a70ec02 Faulting application path: C:\Windows\system32\SearchIndexer.exe Faulting module path: C:\Windows\System32\NLSData0007.dll Report Id: b4f7a7ae-0f92-11df-87fc-e5d65d8794c2 Event Xml: <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"> <System> <Provider Name="Application Error" /> <EventID Qualifiers="0">1000</EventID> <Level>2</Level> <Task>100</Task> <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords> <TimeCreated SystemTime="2010-02-02T00:34:23.000000000Z" /> <EventRecordID>10689</EventRecordID> <Channel>Application</Channel> <Computer>ricky-win7</Computer> <Security /> </System> <EventData> <Data>SearchIndexer.exe</Data> <Data>7.0.7600.16385</Data> <Data>4a5bcdd0</Data> <Data>NLSData0007.dll</Data> <Data>6.1.7600.16385</Data> <Data>4a5bda88</Data> <Data>c0000005</Data> <Data>002141ba</Data> <Data>13a0</Data> <Data>01caa39f2a70ec02</Data> <Data>C:\Windows\system32\SearchIndexer.exe</Data> <Data>C:\Windows\System32\NLSData0007.dll</Data> <Data>b4f7a7ae-0f92-11df-87fc-e5d65d8794c2</Data> </EventData> </Event> If you are having the same error and arrived here from a Google search, please comment or add an answer detailing your progress on this, if any...

    Read the article

  • What is Advanced Search Operators?

    Search engines have set up further tools referred to as advanced search operators to provide power users possibly far more control when searching. Advanced search operators are distinctive phrases which you could insert in your search query for you to come across unique sorts of details of which the common search are not able to offer. A number of of those operators provide beneficial resources for Search engines gurus and other people who want really special data, or perhaps who wish to minimize their particular search to very specific source.

    Read the article

  • Implementing Advanced Search Operators

    Search engines have set up additional applications identified as advanced search operators to give sophisticated users additionally more management while searching. Advanced search operators are exceptional terms that you just can put in your search item for you to locate particular sorts of info that a standard search are unable to provide. Numerous of these operators supply handy tools for Search engines gurus and some others who require rather specific details, or maybe who prefer to minimize their search to really distinct results.

    Read the article

  • Why You Should Do Search Engine Optimization

    If you do internet savvy then you need to take help of the services that are search engine optimization as you not have difficulty in your search. If you use search engine optimization then you don't need to hire any professional for your search. You can use search engine to promote your product and services. But for this you will have to take aid of search engine optimization assistance. The following are some reasons that will convey you to take benefit of the services that are provided by search engine optimization assistance:

    Read the article

  • Removing Paths/ Landing Pages From SharePoint Search Results

    - by j.strugnell
    Hi there, We've been asked by a client to remove a number of pages from being shown up in their public website search results page. I've been into the SSP and created Crawl Rules to remove these pages. All seemed to have worked ok but we have an issue in that landing pages are still showing up in their "www.domain.com/sitearea/" form but not in their "www.domain.com/sitearea/pages/default.aspx". For each of this type of page we have created one rule to "Exclude" the "aspx" path and another rule to include the "/" path but to "Follow links on the URL without crawling the URL itself". We tried adding rules to exclude the "/" format but that only resulted in all results underneath that being excluded. Does anybody know how to remove the "area/pages/default.aspx" and the "area/" pats from Search Results? I'm not sure if it's the "done thing" to ask 2 questions in one but this is in a similar vein so it should be ok. I was wondering if anyone knew of a tool (or if it is possible) to allow site admins to exclude pages from search results (not via SSP/Crawl Rules). I know they can do it at the site level but I was wondering if anything out there enabled this to be done at the page level through either Page or Site Settings?

    Read the article

  • How can we implement network search for Windows AND OS X clients?

    - by michielvoo
    We have a network with Windows 7 and OS X (10.5 and 10.6) computers. Our servers run on Windows Server 2003 (1 Small Business Server, 2 Standard). We need to be able to search through about 15.000 - 30.000 documents in our archives. The best solution would be if users can search directly from the Windows menu (on Windows 7) or the Spotlight menu (on OS X 10.5 and 10.6). Also good would be if users can search directly from the search bar in their browsers, or by first visiting a site with the search form. In case the users search through the browser, it's important they they are able to open a file in the search results just by clicking on it. I have tested Microsoft Search Server Express, but it doesn't meet the requirements (no OS X support, results in the browser can't be opened by clicking in anything but Internet Explorer). I have looked at Spotlight server, but that only supports OS X. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Vim - select text highlighted by search?

    - by GorillaSandwich
    In vim, I often perform searches to hop to a word or phrase instead of navigating there with h/j/k/l. Then I hit n to hop between occurrences. Say I've got this text: Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana. - Groucho Marx I type /an arrow and hit enter. That phrase is highlighted, and I jump to it. Now I want to visually select that text, maybe to change it or delete it. (Yes, I'm aware of the :s substitution command.) Since my cursor is at the letter "a" at the beginning of "an arrow," I can hit v, then press e a couple of times to highlight the entire phrase. But I have a feeling there's a shorter and more semantic way. After all, I've already specified the text I'm interested in. How might I compose a command to say "visually select the current search selection?"

    Read the article

  • How can we implement network search for Windows AND OS X clients?

    - by michielvoo
    We have a network with Windows 7 and OS X (10.5 and 10.6) computers. Our servers run on Windows Server 2003 (1 Small Business Server, 2 Standard). We need to be able to search through about 15.000 - 30.000 documents in our archives. The best solution would be if users can search directly from the Windows menu (on Windows 7) or the Spotlight menu (on OS X 10.5 and 10.6). Also good would be if users can search directly from the search bar in their browsers, or by first visiting a site with the search form. In case the users search through the browser, it's important they they are able to open a file in the search results just by clicking on it. I have tested Microsoft Search Server Express, but it doesn't meet the requirements (no OS X support, results in the browser can't be opened by clicking in anything but Internet Explorer). I have looked at Spotlight server, but that only supports OS X. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Not able to compile dbus-ping-pong

    - by Mahipal
    I have downloaded files from http://cgit.collabora.com/git/user/alban/dbus-ping-pong.git/tree/ I am trying to compile it using the command gcc pkg-config --libs --cflags dbus-1 dbus-glib-1-2 glib-2.0 -o dbus-ping-pong dbus-ping-pong.c However, I get errors: /tmp/ccmJkxXb.o: In function g_once_init_enter: dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x22): undefined reference to g_once_init_enter_impl /tmp/ccmJkxXb.o: In function dbus_glib_marshal_echo_srv__BOOLEAN__STRING_POINTER_POINTER: dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x52): undefined reference to g_return_if_fail_warning dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x79): undefined reference to g_return_if_fail_warning dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x9d): undefined reference to g_value_peek_pointer dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0xac): undefined reference to g_value_peek_pointer dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x109): undefined reference to g_value_set_boolean /tmp/ccmJkxXb.o: In function echo_ping_class_intern_init: dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x122): undefined reference to g_type_class_peek_parent /tmp/ccmJkxXb.o: In function echo_ping_get_type: dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x162): undefined reference to g_intern_static_string dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x192): undefined reference to g_type_register_static_simple dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x1a8): undefined reference to g_once_init_leave /tmp/ccmJkxXb.o: In function echo_ping_class_init: dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x1cd): undefined reference to g_type_class_add_private dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x1e2): undefined reference to dbus_g_object_type_install_info /tmp/ccmJkxXb.o: In function echo_ping_init: dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x1fe): undefined reference to g_type_instance_get_private /tmp/ccmJkxXb.o: In function echo_ping: dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x21d): undefined reference to g_strdup /tmp/ccmJkxXb.o: In function client: dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x265): undefined reference to dbus_g_proxy_new_for_name dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x2c3): undefined reference to dbus_g_proxy_call dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x2d1): undefined reference to dbus_g_error_quark dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x2f1): undefined reference to dbus_g_error_get_name dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x305): undefined reference to g_printerr dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x31d): undefined reference to g_printerr dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x328): undefined reference to g_error_free dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x358): undefined reference to g_print dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x363): undefined reference to g_free /tmp/ccmJkxXb.o: In function main: dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x38f): undefined reference to g_type_init dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x3a3): undefined reference to dbus_g_bus_get dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x3c7): undefined reference to g_object_new dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x3df): undefined reference to g_type_check_instance_cast dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x3f9): undefined reference to dbus_g_connection_register_g_object dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x406): undefined reference to dbus_g_connection_get_connection dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x426): undefined reference to dbus_bus_request_name dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x43a): undefined reference to g_main_loop_new dbus-ping-pong.c:(.text+0x44a): undefined reference to g_main_loop_run How do I resolve this issue ?

    Read the article

  • Draw underlined / strikethrough text ( MULTILINE STRING ) ?

    - by Madhup
    Hi, I have to draw underlined-multiline text with all types of text alignment. I have searched on forums and got some results like: http://davidjhinson.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/underline-text-on-the-iphone/ http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=561572 But all draw text for single line only. while i have multi-line text. The situation even become worse when the text alignment is centered. I searched and found that in iphone-sdk-3.2 there are some core-text attributes for underlining a text but no idea how to use that. Besides if I use these my problem would not be solved fully. As I have to draw strikethrough text also. Anybody having idea about this please help.

    Read the article

  • delphi insert update record´s

    - by ml
    Hi friends what is that im doing wrong because it goes and goes on LOOP var ii: Integer; i: Integer; j: Integer; ie : integer; je : integer; fileSource, fileDest: string; Fo : TSHFileOpStruct; buffer : array[0..4096] of char; p : pchar; dirFile: String; dirFile1: String; dirFile11: String; begin dirFile1 := (Dirlocal + 'Vibrometria\'+ClienteN.text+'\'); dirFile := (localAplicação+ 'Vibrometria\'+ClienteN.text+'\'+NInterv.text ) ; dirFile11:= Dirlocal+'Vibrometria\'; if ForceDirectories(dirFile11) then if ForceDirectories(dirFile1) then //...................................................................... begin ShowMessage('Vai devolver "'+cxDBTextEdit5.Text+'..........' +obra.Text); Sub_TRelFinal.First; Begin ADOTable_casa.First; Begin begin Sub_TRelFinal.Edit; //Tabela1Codoco.Value := Tabela2Codoco.Value; Sub_TRelFinal.FieldByName('Foto1').text := ADOTable_casa.FieldByName('Foto1').text; Sub_TRelFinal.FieldByName('Obra').text := ADOTable_casa.FieldByName('Obra').text; Sub_TRelFinal.FieldByName('OBS1').text := ADOTable_casa.FieldByName('OBS1').text; Sub_TRelFinal.FieldByName('Data_VisitaLocal').text := ADOTable_casa.FieldByName('Data_VisitaLocal').text; Sub_TRelFinal.FieldByName('ContractoN').text := ADOTable_casa .FieldByName('ContractoN').text;; Sub_TRelFinal.FieldByName('Cliente').text := ADOTable_casa .FieldByName('Cliente').text; Sub_TRelFinal.FieldByName('Morada').text := ADOTable_casa .FieldByName('Morada').text; Sub_TRelFinal.FieldByName('localizacao').text:= ADOTable_casa .FieldByName('localizacao').text; Sub_TRelFinal.FieldByName('Intruducao').text:= ADOTable_casa .FieldByName('Intruducao').text; Sub_TRelFinal.FieldByName('Analise').text := ADOTable_casa.FieldByName('Analise').text; Sub_TRelFinal.Post; end; End; end; //iniciar inserção registos sub Sub_TRelFinal_1.First; For j := 1 to Sub_TRelFinal_1.RecordCount do Begin ADOTable_casa_sub_1.First; For i := 1 To ADOTable_casa_sub_1.RecordCount Do Begin begin Sub_TRelFinal_1.Edit; //Tabela1Codoco.Value := Tabela2Codoco.Value; Sub_TRelFinal_1.FieldByName('Foto1').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_1.FieldByName('Foto1').text; Sub_TRelFinal_1.FieldByName('Obra').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_1.FieldByName('Obra').text; Sub_TRelFinal_1.FieldByName('OBS1').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_1.FieldByName('OBS1').text; Sub_TRelFinal_1.FieldByName('Data_VisitaLocal').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_1.FieldByName('Data_VisitaLocal').text; Sub_TRelFinal_1.FieldByName('ContractoN').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_1.FieldByName('ContractoN').text; Sub_TRelFinal_1.FieldByName('Cliente').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_1.FieldByName('Cliente').text; Sub_TRelFinal_1.FieldByName('Morada').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_1.FieldByName('Morada').text; Sub_TRelFinal_1.FieldByName('localizacao_eq').text:= ADOTable_casa_sub_1.FieldByName('localizacao_eq').text; Sub_TRelFinal_1.FieldByName('Equipamento').text:= ADOTable_casa_sub_1.FieldByName('Equipamento').text; Sub_TRelFinal_1.FieldByName('tipo_equip').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_1.FieldByName('tipo_equip').text; Sub_TRelFinal_1.Post; end; //iniciar inserção registos subsub SubTRelFinal_sub.First; For ie := 1 to SubTRelFinal_sub.RecordCount do Begin ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.First; For je := 1 To ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.RecordCount Do begin SubTRelFinal_sub.Edit; //Tabela1Codoco.Value := Tabela2Codoco.Value; SubTRelFinal_sub.FieldByName('Foto1').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.FieldByName('Foto1').text; SubTRelFinal_sub.FieldByName('Foto2').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.FieldByName('Foto2').text; SubTRelFinal_sub.FieldByName('Analisefoto1').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.FieldByName('Analisefoto1').text; SubTRelFinal_sub.FieldByName('Observações').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.FieldByName('Observações').text;; SubTRelFinal_sub.FieldByName('ContractoN').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.FieldByName('ContractoN').text; SubTRelFinal_sub.FieldByName('OBS3').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.FieldByName('OBS3').text; SubTRelFinal_sub.FieldByName('OBS4').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.FieldByName('OBS4').text; SubTRelFinal_sub.FieldByName('OBS2').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.FieldByName('OBS2').text; SubTRelFinal_sub.FieldByName('OBS1').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.FieldByName('OBS1').text; SubTRelFinal_sub.FieldByName('Localização').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.FieldByName('Localização').text; SubTRelFinal_sub.FieldByName('Tipo_equipamento').text:= ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.FieldByName('Tipo_equipamento').text; SubTRelFinal_sub.FieldByName('Analisefoto101').text:= ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.FieldByName('Analisefoto101').text; SubTRelFinal_sub.FieldByName('Analisefoto201').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.FieldByName('Analisefoto201').text; SubTRelFinal_sub.FieldByName('GrauAnomalia').text := ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.FieldByName('GrauAnomalia').text; SubTRelFinal_sub.Post; end; ADOTable_casa_sub_Sub.Next; End; SubTRelFinal_sub.Next; End; ADOTable_casa_sub_1.Next; End; Sub_TRelFinal_1 .Next;

    Read the article

  • Lucene.NET search index approach

    - by Tim Peel
    Hi, I am trying to put together a test case for using Lucene.NET on one of our websites. I'd like to do the following: Index in a single unique id. Index across a comma delimitered string of terms or tags. For example. Item 1: Id = 1 Tags = Something,Separated-Term I will then be structuring the search so I can look for documents against tag i.e. tags:something OR tags:separate-term I need to maintain the exact term value in order to search against it. I have something running, and the search query is being parsed as expected, but I am not seeing any results. Here's some code. My parser (_luceneAnalyzer is passed into my indexing service): var parser = new QueryParser(Lucene.Net.Util.Version.LUCENE_CURRENT, "Tags", _luceneAnalyzer); parser.SetDefaultOperator(QueryParser.Operator.AND); return parser; My Lucene.NET document creation: var doc = new Document(); var id = new Field( "Id", NumericUtils.IntToPrefixCoded(indexObject.id), Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED, Field.TermVector.NO); var tags = new Field( "Tags", string.Join(",", indexObject.Tags.ToArray()), Field.Store.NO, Field.Index.ANALYZED, Field.TermVector.YES); doc.Add(id); doc.Add(tags); return doc; My search: var parser = BuildQueryParser(); var query = parser.Parse(searchQuery); var searcher = Searcher; TopDocs hits = searcher.Search(query, null, max); IList<SearchResult> result = new List<SearchResult>(); float scoreNorm = 1.0f / hits.GetMaxScore(); for (int i = 0; i < hits.scoreDocs.Length; i++) { float score = hits.scoreDocs[i].score * scoreNorm; result.Add(CreateSearchResult(searcher.Doc(hits.scoreDocs[i].doc), score)); } return result; I have two documents in my index, one with the tag "Something" and one with the tags "Something" and "Separated-Term". It's important for the - to remain in the terms as I want an exact match on the full value. When I search with "tags:Something" I do not get any results. Question What Analyzer should I be using to achieve the search index I am after? Are there any pointers for putting together a search such as this? Why is my current search not returning any results? Many thanks

    Read the article

  • embeding google images search in my website

    - by user1445497
    I want to embed a search box to allow my website users to search images using google images search (not only images in my website, but general images search). However, I don't want an Iframe of something similar, but to present a custom list of the images and links in the format I chose. Ideally, I could get the links to the thumbnails to the in JSON. From what I have found so far, it seems that google no longer supports it's API: https://developers.google.com/image-search/ I am familiar with google custom search, but as far as I know, I can't control exactly how it will be presented. Are there other ways to do it? Thanks, Daniel

    Read the article

  • Architecture for analysing search result impressions/clicks to improve future searches

    - by Hais
    We have a large database of items (10m+) stored in MySQL and intend to implement search on metadata on these items, taking advantage of something like Sphinx. The dataset will be changing slightly on a daily basis so Sphinx will be re-indexing daily. However we want the algorithm to self-learn and improve search results by analysing impression and click data so that we provide better results for our customers on that search term, and possibly other similar search terms too. I've been reading up on Hadoop and it seems like it has the potential to crunch all this data, although I'm still unsure how to approach it. Amazon has tutorials for compiling impression vs click data using MapReduce but I can't see how to get this data in a useable format. My idea is that when a search term comes in I query Sphinx to get all the matching items from the dataset, then query the analytics (compiled on an hourly basis or similar) so that we know the most popular items for that search term, then cache the final results using something like Memcached, Membase or similar. Am I along the right lines here?

    Read the article

  • No action responded to search

    - by gazza58
    i have defined a method called 'search' in my RecipesController which is not private. in routes.rb i have the following: map.connect 'recipes/search', :controller => :recipes, :action => :search i get the following error: No action responded to search. Actions: ... where my method 'search' does not appear in the actions list. if i change the method name from 'search' to 'searchthings' and the action in routes to 'searchthings' then this seems to work. what am i missing here?

    Read the article

  • How to "redefine search" or correct "misspelling" from the database

    - by From.ME.to.YOU
    Hello i want to add new feature to the search in my website. i'm using PHP and MYSQL. mysql database containing a table to the items that the user will search for, for each item there is a "keyword" column that's comma separated keywords "EXAMPLE: cat,dog,horse". after the user search in my website i want to get the words that are let me say "85%" similar to his search keyword, this is for redefine search. and for misspelling i want a service or something that provide if the keyword is correct or misspelled so i get some corrections and check if those exists in the database and then give those corrections to user to change his search keyword. i'm not asking for a solution here ... but if you can direct me in a one way or another that will be great Thanks guys Cheers

    Read the article

  • Consumer Oriented Search In Oracle Endeca Information Discovery - Part 2

    - by Bob Zurek
    As discussed in my last blog posting on this topic, Information Discovery, a core capability of the Oracle Endeca Information Discovery solution enables businesses to search, discover and navigate through a wide variety of big data including structured, unstructured and semi-structured data. With search as a core advanced capabilities of our product it is important to understand some of the key differences and capabilities in the underlying data store of Oracle Endeca Information Discovery and that is our Endeca Server. In the last post on this subject, we talked about Exploratory Search capabilities along with support for cascading relevance. Additional search capabilities in the Endeca Server, which differentiate from simple keyword based "search boxes" in other Information Discovery products also include: The Endeca Server Supports Set Search.  The Endeca Server is organized around set retrieval, which means that it looks at groups of results (all the documents that match a search), as well as the relationship of each individual result to the set. Other approaches only compute the relevance of a document by comparing the document to the search query – not by comparing the document to all the others. For example, a search for “U.S.” in another approach might match to the title of a document and get a high ranking. But what if it were a collection of government documents in which “U.S.” appeared in many titles, making that clue less meaningful? A set analysis would reveal this and be used to adjust relevance accordingly. The Endeca Server Supports Second-Order Relvance. Unlike simple search interfaces in traditional BI tools, which provide limited relevance ranking, such as a list of results based on key word matching, Endeca enables users to determine the most salient terms to divide up the result. Determining this second-order relevance is the key to providing effective guidance. Support for Queries and Filters. Search is the most common query type, but hardly complete, and users need to express a wide range of queries. Oracle Endeca Information Discovery also includes navigation, interactive visualizations, analytics, range filters, geospatial filters, and other query types that are more commonly associated with BI tools. Unlike other approaches, these queries operate across structured, semi-structured and unstructured content stored in the Endeca Server. Furthermore, this set is easily extensible because the core engine allows for pluggable features to be added. Like a search engine, queries are answered with a results list, ranked to put the most likely matches first. Unlike “black box” relevance solutions, which generalize one strategy for everyone, we believe that optimal relevance strategies vary across domains. Therefore, it provides line-of-business owners with a set of relevance modules that let them tune the best results based on their content. The Endeca Server query result sets are summarized, which gives users guidance on how to refine and explore further. Summaries include Guided Navigation® (a form of faceted search), maps, charts, graphs, tag clouds, concept clusters, and clarification dialogs. Users don’t explicitly ask for these summaries; Oracle Endeca Information Discovery analytic applications provide the right ones, based on configurable controls and rules. For example, the analytic application might guide a procurement agent filtering for in-stock parts by visualizing the results on a map and calculating their average fulfillment time. Furthermore, the user can interact with summaries and filters without resorting to writing complex SQL queries. The user can simply just click to add filters. Within Oracle Endeca Information Discovery, all parts of the summaries are clickable and searchable. We are living in a search driven society where business users really seem to enjoy entering information into a search box. We do this everyday as consumers and therefore, we have gotten used to looking for that box. However, the key to getting the right results is to guide that user in a way that provides additional Discovery, beyond what they may have anticipated. This is why these important and advanced features of search inside the Endeca Server have been so important. They have helped to guide our great customers to success. 

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34  | Next Page >