Search Results

Search found 45316 results on 1813 pages for 'class literals'.

Page 276/1813 | < Previous Page | 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283  | Next Page >

  • Register all GUI components as Observers or pass current object to next object as a constructor argu

    - by Jack
    First, I'd like to say that I think this is a common issue and there may be a simple or common solution that I am unaware of. Many have probably encountered a similar problem. Thanks for reading. I am creating a GUI where each component needs to communicate (or at least be updated) by multiple other components. Currently, I'm using a Singleton class to accomplish this goal. Each GUI component gets the instance of the singleton and registers itself. When updates need to be made, the singleton can call public methods in the registered class. I think this is similar to an Observer pattern, but the singleton has more control. Currently, the program is set up something like this: class c1 { CommClass cc; c1() { cc = CommClass.getCommClass(); cc.registerC1( this ); C2 c2 = new c2(); } } class c2 { CommClass cc; c2() { cc = CommClass.getCommClass(); cc.registerC2( this ); C3 c3 = new c3(); } } class c3 { CommClass cc; c3() { cc = CommClass.getCommClass(); cc.registerC3( this ); C4 c4 = new c4(); } } etc. Unfortunately, the singleton class keeps growing larger as more communication is required between the components. I was wondering if it's a good idea to instead of using this singleton, pass the higher order GUI components as arguments in the constructors of each GUI component: class c1 { c1() { C2 c2 = new c2( this ); } } class c2 { C1 c1; c2( C1 c1 ) { this.c1 = c1 C3 c3 = new c3( c1, this ); } } class c3 { C1 c1; C2 c2; c3( C1 c1, C2 c2 ) { this.c1 = c1; this.c2 = c2; C4 c4 = new c4( c1, c2, this ); } } etc. The second version relies less on the CommClass, but it's still very messy as the private member variables increase in number and the constructors grow in length. Each class contains GUI components that need to communicate through CommClass, but I can't think of a good way to do it. If this seems strange or horribly inefficient, please describe some method of communication between classes that will continue to work as the project grows. Also, if this doesn't make any sense to anyone, I'll try to give actual code snippets in the future and think of a better way to ask the question. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Asp.NET custom templated datalist throws argument out of range (index) on button press

    - by MrTortoise
    I have a class BaseTemplate public abstract class BaseTemplate : ITemplate This adds the controls, and provides abstract methods to implement in the inheriting class. The inheriting class then adds its html according to its data source and manages the data binding. This all works fine - I get the control appearing with properly parsed html. The problem is that the base class adds controls into the template that have their own CommandName arguments; the idea is that the class that implements the custom templated dataList will provide the logic of setting the Selected and Edit Indexes. This class also manages the data binding, etc. It sets all of the templates on the datalist in the Init method (which was another cause of this exception). The exception gets thrown when I hit one of these buttons - I have tried hooking up both their click and command events everywhere in case this was the problem. I have also ensured that their command names do not match any of the system ones. The stack trace does not include any references to my methods or objects which is why I am so stuck. It is the most unhelpful message I can imagine. The really frustrating thing is that I cannot get a breakpoint to fire - i.e. the problem is happening after I click the button, but before and of my code can execute. The last time this exception happened was when I had this code in a user control and was assigning the templates to the datalist in the PageLoad. I moved these into init to fix that problem; however, this is a problem that was there then and I have no idea what is causing it let alone how to solve it (and index out of range doesn't really help without knowing what index.) The Exception Details Exception Details: System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: Specified argument was out of the range of valid values. Parameter name: index The Stack Trace: [ArgumentOutOfRangeException: Specified argument was out of the range of valid values. Parameter name: index] System.Web.UI.ControlCollection.get_Item(Int32 index) +8665582 System.Web.UI.WebControls.DataList.GetItem(ListItemType itemType, Int32 repeatIndex) +8667655 System.Web.UI.WebControls.DataList.System.Web.UI.WebControls.IRepeatInfoUser.GetItemStyle(ListItemType itemType, Int32 repeatIndex) +11 System.Web.UI.WebControls.RepeatInfo.RenderVerticalRepeater(HtmlTextWriter writer, IRepeatInfoUser user, Style controlStyle, WebControl baseControl) +8640873 System.Web.UI.WebControls.RepeatInfo.RenderRepeater(HtmlTextWriter writer, IRepeatInfoUser user, Style controlStyle, WebControl baseControl) +27 System.Web.UI.WebControls.DataList.RenderContents(HtmlTextWriter writer) +208 System.Web.UI.WebControls.BaseDataList.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) +30 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControlInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +27 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +99 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer) +25 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ICollection children) +134 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildren(HtmlTextWriter writer) +19 System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm.RenderChildren(HtmlTextWriter writer) +163 System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlContainerControl.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) +32 System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm.Render(HtmlTextWriter output) +51 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControlInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +27 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +99 System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer) +40 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildrenInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ICollection children) +134 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderChildren(HtmlTextWriter writer) +19 System.Web.UI.Page.Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) +29 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControlInternal(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +27 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer, ControlAdapter adapter) +99 System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControl(HtmlTextWriter writer) +25 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +1266 The code Base class: public abstract class BaseTemplate : ITemplate { ListItemType _templateType; public BaseTemplate(ListItemType theTemplateType) { _templateType = theTemplateType; } public ListItemType ListItemType { get { return _templateType; } } #region ITemplate Members public void InstantiateIn(Control container) { PlaceHolder ph = new PlaceHolder(); container.Controls.Add(ph); Literal l = new Literal(); switch (_templateType) { case ListItemType.Header: { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<table><tr>")); InstantiateInHeader(ph); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</tr>")); break; } case ListItemType.Footer: { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<tr>")); InstantiateInFooter(ph); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</tr></table>")); break; } case ListItemType.Item: { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<tr>")); InstantiateInItem(ph); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>")); Button select = new Button(); select.ID = "btnSelect"; select.CommandName = "SelectRow"; select.Text = "Select"; ph.Controls.Add(select); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td>")); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</tr>")); ph.DataBinding += new EventHandler(ph_DataBinding); break; } case ListItemType.AlternatingItem: { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<tr>")); InstantiateInAlternatingItem(ph); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>")); Button select = new Button(); select.ID = "btnSelect"; select.CommandName = "SelectRow"; select.Text = "Select"; ph.Controls.Add(select); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td>")); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</tr>")); ph.DataBinding+=new EventHandler(ph_DataBinding); break; } case ListItemType.SelectedItem: { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<tr>")); InstantiateInItem(ph); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>")); Button edit = new Button(); edit.ID = "btnEdit"; edit.CommandName = "EditRow"; edit.Text = "Edit"; ph.Controls.Add(edit); Button delete = new Button(); delete.ID = "btnDelete"; delete.CommandName = "DeleteRow"; delete.Text = "Delete"; ph.Controls.Add(delete); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td>")); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</tr>")); ph.DataBinding += new EventHandler(ph_DataBinding); break; } case ListItemType.EditItem: { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<tr>")); InstantiateInEdit(ph); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>")); Button save = new Button(); save.ID = "btnSave"; save.CommandName = "SaveRow"; save.Text = "Save"; ph.Controls.Add(save); Button cancel = new Button(); cancel.ID = "btnCancel"; cancel.CommandName = "CancelRow"; cancel.Text = "Cancel"; ph.Controls.Add(cancel); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td>")); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</tr>")); ph.DataBinding += new EventHandler(ph_DataBinding); break; } case ListItemType.Separator: { InstantiateInSeperator(ph); break; } } } void ph_DataBinding(object sender, EventArgs e) { DataBindingOverride(sender, e); } /// <summary> /// the controls placed into the PlaceHolder will get wrapped in &lt;table&gt;&lt;tr&gt; &lt;/tr&gt;. I.e. you need to provide the column names wrapped in &lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt; tags. /// </summary> /// <param name="header"></param> public abstract void InstantiateInHeader(PlaceHolder ph); /// <summary> /// the controls will have a column added after them and so require each column to be properly wrapped in &lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt; tags. The &lt;tr&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; is handled in the base class. /// </summary> /// <param name="ph"></param> public abstract void InstantiateInItem(PlaceHolder ph); /// <summary> /// the controls will have a column added after them and so require each column to be properly wrapped in &lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt; tags. The &lt;tr&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; is handled in the base class. /// </summary> /// <param name="ph"></param> public abstract void InstantiateInAlternatingItem(PlaceHolder ph); /// <summary> /// the controls will have a column added after them and so require each column to be properly wrapped in &lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt; tags. The &lt;tr&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; is handled in the base class. /// </summary> /// <param name="ph"></param> public abstract void InstantiateInEdit(PlaceHolder ph); /// <summary> /// Any html used in the footer will have &lt;/tr&gt;&lt;table&gt; appended to the end. /// &lt;tr&gt; will be appended to the front. /// </summary> /// <param name="ph"></param> public abstract void InstantiateInFooter(PlaceHolder ph); /// <summary> /// the controls will have a column added after them and so require each column to be properly wrapped in &lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt; tags. The &lt;tr&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; is handled in the base class. /// Adds Delete and Edit Buttons after the table contents. /// </summary> /// <param name="ph"></param> public abstract void InstantiateInSelectedItem(PlaceHolder ph); /// <summary> /// The base class provides no &lt;tr&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; tags /// </summary> /// <param name="ph"></param> public abstract void InstantiateInSeperator(PlaceHolder ph); /// <summary> /// Use this method to bind the controls to their data. /// </summary> /// <param name="sender"></param> /// <param name="e"></param> public abstract void DataBindingOverride(object sender, EventArgs e); #endregion } Inheriting class: public class NominalGroupTemplate : BaseTemplate { public NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType theListItemType) : base(theListItemType) { } public override void InstantiateInHeader(PlaceHolder ph) { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>ID</td><td>Group</td><td>IsPositive</td>")); } public override void InstantiateInItem(PlaceHolder ph) { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>")); Label lblID = new Label(); lblID.ID = "lblID"; ph.Controls.Add(lblID); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td><td>")); Label lblGroup = new Label(); lblGroup.ID = "lblGroup"; ph.Controls.Add(lblGroup); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td><td>")); CheckBox chkIsPositive = new CheckBox(); chkIsPositive.ID = "chkIsPositive"; chkIsPositive.Enabled = false; ph.Controls.Add(chkIsPositive); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td>")); } public override void InstantiateInAlternatingItem(PlaceHolder ph) { InstantiateInItem(ph); } public override void InstantiateInEdit(PlaceHolder ph) { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>")); Label lblID = new Label(); lblID.ID = "lblID"; ph.Controls.Add(lblID); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td><td>")); TextBox txtGroup = new TextBox(); txtGroup.ID = "txtGroup"; txtGroup.Visible = true; txtGroup.Enabled = true ; ph.Controls.Add(txtGroup); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td><td>")); CheckBox chkIsPositive = new CheckBox(); chkIsPositive.ID = "chkIsPositive"; chkIsPositive.Visible = true; chkIsPositive.Enabled = true ; ph.Controls.Add(chkIsPositive); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td>")); } public override void InstantiateInFooter(PlaceHolder ph) { InstantiateInHeader(ph); } public override void InstantiateInSelectedItem(PlaceHolder ph) { ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"<td>")); Label lblID = new Label(); lblID.ID = "lblID"; ph.Controls.Add(lblID); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td><td>")); TextBox txtGroup = new TextBox(); txtGroup.ID = "txtGroup"; txtGroup.Visible = true; txtGroup.Enabled = false; ph.Controls.Add(txtGroup); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td><td>")); CheckBox chkIsPositive = new CheckBox(); chkIsPositive.ID = "chkIsPositive"; chkIsPositive.Visible = true; chkIsPositive.Enabled = false; ph.Controls.Add(chkIsPositive); ph.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(@"</td>")); } public override void InstantiateInSeperator(PlaceHolder ph) { } public override void DataBindingOverride(object sender, EventArgs e) { PlaceHolder ph = (PlaceHolder)sender; DataListItem li = (DataListItem)ph.NamingContainer; int id = Convert.ToInt32(DataBinder.Eval(li.DataItem, "ID")); string group = (string)DataBinder.Eval(li.DataItem, "Group"); bool isPositive = Convert.ToBoolean(DataBinder.Eval(li.DataItem, "IsPositive")); switch (this.ListItemType) { case ListItemType.Item: case ListItemType.AlternatingItem: { ((Label)ph.FindControl("lblID")).Text = id.ToString(); ((Label)ph.FindControl("lblGroup")).Text = group; ((CheckBox)ph.FindControl("chkIsPositive")).Text = isPositive.ToString(); break; } case ListItemType.EditItem: case ListItemType.SelectedItem: { ((TextBox)ph.FindControl("lblID")).Text = id.ToString(); ((TextBox)ph.FindControl("txtGroup")).Text = group; ((CheckBox)ph.FindControl("chkIsPositive")).Text = isPositive.ToString(); break; } } } } From here I added the control to a page the code behind public partial class NominalGroupbroke : System.Web.UI.UserControl { public void SetNominalGroupList(IList<BONominalGroup> theNominalGroups) { XElement data = Serialiser<BONominalGroup>.SerialiseObjectList(theNominalGroups); ViewState.Add("nominalGroups", data.ToString()); dlNominalGroup.DataSource = theNominalGroups; dlNominalGroup.DataBind(); } protected void Page_init() { dlNominalGroup.HeaderTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Header); dlNominalGroup.ItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Item); dlNominalGroup.AlternatingItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.AlternatingItem); dlNominalGroup.SeparatorTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Separator); dlNominalGroup.SelectedItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.SelectedItem); dlNominalGroup.EditItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.EditItem); dlNominalGroup.FooterTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Footer); } protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { dlNominalGroup.ItemCommand += new DataListCommandEventHandler(dlNominalGroup_ItemCommand); } void dlNominalGroup_Init(object sender, EventArgs e) { dlNominalGroup.HeaderTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Header); dlNominalGroup.ItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Item); dlNominalGroup.AlternatingItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.AlternatingItem); dlNominalGroup.SeparatorTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Separator); dlNominalGroup.SelectedItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.SelectedItem); dlNominalGroup.EditItemTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.EditItem); dlNominalGroup.FooterTemplate = new NominalGroupTemplate(ListItemType.Footer); } void dlNominalGroup_DataBinding(object sender, EventArgs e) { } void deleteNominalGroup(int index) { XElement data = XElement.Parse(Convert.ToString( ViewState["nominalGroups"] )); IList<BONominalGroup> list = Serialiser<BONominalGroup>.DeserialiseObjectList(data); FENominalGroup.DeleteNominalGroup(list[index].ID); list.RemoveAt(index); data = Serialiser<BONominalGroup>.SerialiseObjectList(list); ViewState["nominalGroups"] = data.ToString(); dlNominalGroup.DataSource = list; dlNominalGroup.DataBind(); } void updateNominalGroup(DataListItem theItem) { XElement data = XElement.Parse(Convert.ToString( ViewState["nominalGroups"])); IList<BONominalGroup> list = Serialiser<BONominalGroup>.DeserialiseObjectList(data); BONominalGroup old = list[theItem.ItemIndex]; BONominalGroup n = new BONominalGroup(); byte id = Convert.ToByte(((TextBox)theItem.FindControl("lblID")).Text); string group = ((TextBox)theItem.FindControl("txtGroup")).Text; bool isPositive = Convert.ToBoolean(((CheckBox)theItem.FindControl("chkIsPositive")).Text); n.ID = id; n.Group = group; n.IsPositive = isPositive; FENominalGroup.UpdateNominalGroup(old, n); list[theItem.ItemIndex] = n; data = Serialiser<BONominalGroup>.SerialiseObjectList(list); ViewState["nominalGroups"] = data.ToString(); } void dlNominalGroup_ItemCommand(object source, DataListCommandEventArgs e) { DataList l = (DataList)source; switch (e.CommandName) { case "SelectRow": { if (l.EditItemIndex == -1) { l.SelectedIndex = e.Item.ItemIndex; l.EditItemIndex = -1; } break; } case "EditRow": { if (l.SelectedIndex == e.Item.ItemIndex) { l.EditItemIndex = e.Item.ItemIndex; } break; } case "DeleteRow": { deleteNominalGroup(e.Item.ItemIndex); l.EditItemIndex = -1; try { l.SelectedIndex = e.Item.ItemIndex; } catch { l.SelectedIndex = -1; } break; } case "CancelRow": { l.SelectedIndex = l.EditItemIndex; l.EditItemIndex = -1; break; } case "SaveRow": { updateNominalGroup(e.Item); try { l.SelectedIndex = e.Item.ItemIndex; } catch { l.SelectedIndex = -1; } l.EditItemIndex = -1; break; } } } Lots of code there, I'm afraid, but it should build. Thanks if anyone manages to spot my silliness. The BONominalGroup class (please ignore my crazy getHash override, I'm not proud of it). IAudit can just be an empty interface here and all will be fine. It used to inherit from another class, I have cleaned that out - so the serialization logic may be broken here. public class BONominalGroup { public BONominalGroup() #region Fields and properties private Int16 _ID; public Int16 ID { get { return _ID; } set { _ID = value; } } private string _group; public string Group { get { return _group; } set { _group = value; } } private bool _isPositve; public bool IsPositive { get { return _isPositve; } set { _isPositve = value; } } #endregion public override bool Equals(object obj) { bool retVal = false; BONominalGroup ng = obj as BONominalGroup; if (ng!=null) if (ng._group == this._group && ng._ID == this.ID && ng.IsPositive == this.IsPositive) { retVal = true; } return retVal; } public override int GetHashCode() { return ToString().GetHashCode(); } public override string ToString() { return "BONominalGroup{ID:" + this.ID.ToString() + ",Group:" + this.Group.ToString() + ",IsPositive:" + this.IsPositive.ToString() + "," + "}"; } #region IXmlSerializable Members public override void ReadXml(XmlReader reader) { reader.ReadStartElement("BONominalGroup"); this.ID = Convert.ToByte(reader.ReadElementString("id")); this.Group = reader.ReadElementString("group"); this.IsPositive = Convert.ToBoolean(reader.ReadElementString("isPositive")); base.ReadXml(reader); reader.ReadEndElement(); } public override void WriteXml(XmlWriter writer) { writer.WriteElementString("id", this.ID.ToString()); writer.WriteElementString("group", this.Group); writer.WriteElementString("isPositive", this.IsPositive.ToString()); // writer.WriteStartElement("BOBase"); // base.WriteXml(writer); writer.WriteEndElement(); } #endregion }

    Read the article

  • Comparing two large sets of attributes

    - by andyashton
    Suppose you have a Django view that has two functions: The first function renders some XML using a XSLT stylesheet and produces a div with 1000 subelements like this: <div id="myText"> <p id="p1"><a class="note-p1" href="#" style="display:none" target="bot">?</a></strong>Lorem ipsum</p> <p id="p2"><a class="note-p2" href="#" style="display:none" target="bot">?</a></strong>Foo bar</p> <p id="p3"><a class="note-p3" href="#" style="display:none" target="bot">?</a></strong>Chocolate peanut butter</p> (etc for 1000 lines) <p id="p1000"><a class="note-p1000" href="#" style="display:none" target="bot">?</a></strong>Go Yankees!</p> </div> The second function renders another XML document using another stylesheet to produce a div like this: <div id="myNotes"> <p id="n1"><cite class="note-p1"><sup>1</sup><span>Trololo</span></cite></p> <p id="n2"><cite class="note-p1"><sup>2</sup><span>Trololo</span></cite></p> <p id="n3"><cite class="note-p2"><sup>3</sup><span>lololo</span></cite></p> (etc for n lines) <p id="n"><cite class="note-p885"><sup>n</sup><span>lololo</span></cite></p> </div> I need to see which elements in #myText have classes that match elements in #myNotes, and display them. I can do this using the following jQuery: $('#myText').find('a').each(function() { var $anchor = $(this); $('#myNotes').find('cite').each(function() { if($(this).attr('class') == $anchor.attr('class')) { $anchor.show(); }); }); However this is incredibly slow and inefficient for a large number of comparisons. What is the fastest/most efficient way to do this - is there a jQuery/js method that is reasonable for a large number of items? Or do I need to reengineer the Django code to do the work before passing it to the template?

    Read the article

  • Marshalling polymorphic objects in JAX-WS

    - by pkchukiss
    I'm creating a JAX-WS type webservice, with operations that return an object WebServiceReply. The class WebServiceReply itself contains a field of type Object. The individual operations would populate that field with a few different data-types, depending on the operation. Publishing the WSDL (I'm using Netbeans 6.7), and getting a ASP.NET application to retrieve and parse the WSDL was fine, but when I tried to call an operation, I would receive the following exception: javax.xml.ws.WebServiceException: javax.xml.bind.MarshalException - with linked exception: [javax.xml.bind.JAXBException: class [LDataObject.Patient; nor any of its super class is known to this context.] How do I mark the annotations in the DataObject.Patient class, as well as the WebServiceReply class to get it to work? I haven't been able to fine a definitive resource on marshalling based upon annotations within the target classes either, so it would be great if anybody could point me to that too. WebServiceReply.java @XmlRootElement(name="WebServiceReply") public class WebServiceReply { private Object returnedObject; private String returnedType; private String message; private String errorMessage; .......... // Getters and setters follow } DataObject.Patient.java @XmlRootElement(name="Patient") public class Patient { private int uid; private Date versionDateTime; private String name; private String identityNumber; private List<Address> addressList; private List<ContactNumber> contactNumberList; private List<Appointment> appointmentList; private List<Case> caseList; } Solution (Thanks to Gregory Mostizky for his answer) I edited the WebServiceReply class so that all the possible return objects extend from a new class ReturnValueBase, and added the annotations using @XmlSeeAlso to ReturnValueBase. JAXB worked properly after that! Nonetheless, I'm still learning about JAXB marshalling in JAX-WS, so it would be great if anyone can still post any tutorial on this. Gregory: you might want to add-on to your answer that the return objects need to sub-class from ReturnValueBase. Thanks a lot for your help! I had been going bonkers over this problem for so long!

    Read the article

  • C# Finalize/Dispose pattern

    - by robUK
    Hello, C# 2008 I have been working on this for a while now. And I am still confused about some issues. My questions below 1) I know that you only need a finalizer if you are disposing of unmanaged resources. However, if you are using managed resources that make calls to unmanaged resources. Would you still need to implement a finalizer? 2) However, if you develop a class that doesn't use any unmanged resources directly or indirectly and you implement the IDisposable so that clients of your class can use the 'using statement'. Would it be acceptable to implement the IDisposable just so that clients of your class can use the using statement? using(myClass objClass = new myClass()) { // Do stuff here } 3) I have developed this simple code below to demostrate the Finalize/dispose pattern: public class NoGateway : IDisposable { private WebClient wc = null; public NoGateway() { wc = new WebClient(); wc.DownloadStringCompleted += wc_DownloadStringCompleted; } // Start the Async call to find if NoGateway is true or false public void NoGatewayStatus() { // Start the Async's download // Do other work here wc.DownloadStringAsync(new Uri(www.xxxx.xxx)); } private void wc_DownloadStringCompleted(object sender, DownloadStringCompletedEventArgs e) { // Do work here } // Dispose of the NoGateway object public void Dispose() { wc.DownloadStringCompleted -= wc_DownloadStringCompleted; wc.Dispose(); GC.SuppressFinalize(this); } } Question about the source code: 1) Here I have not added the finalizer. And normally the finalizer will be called by the GC, and the finalizer will call the Dispose. As I don't have the finalizer, when do I call the Dispose method? Is it the client of the class that has to call it? So my class in the example is called NoGateway and the client could use and dispose of the class like this: Would the Dispose method be automatically called when execution reaches the end of the using block? using(NoGateway objNoGateway = new NoGateway()) { // Do stuff here } Or does the client have to manually call the dispose method i.e.? NoGateway objNoGateway = new NoGateway(); // Do stuff with object objNoGateway.Dispose(); // finished with it Many thanks for helping with all these questions, 2) I am using the webclient class in my 'NoGateway' class. Because the webclient implements the IDisposable interface. Does this mean that the webclient indirectly uses unmanaged resources? Is there any hard and fast rule to follow about this. How do I know that a class uses unmanaged resources?

    Read the article

  • extremely small gap between two divs that are width 100%

    - by Naomi K
    hi I have two container divs one of them has a div with an image background and i think this is the div that is causing problem. I tried removing both container divs and the gap was still here. there are no margins no paddings, and i know it is not the image that has this line its not there when i open it in photoshop. I am also using css reset Where is this space coming from? css .container{ width:100%; } .container2{ width:100%; } .first-image{ width:1430px; height:497px; background-image:url('../images/introimg.jpg'); background-repeat:no-repeat; background-size: 100%; border:none; } .jamey{ width:35%; } .second-image{ width:1430px; height:430px; background-image:url('../images/secondimg.jpg'); background-repeat:no-repeat; background-size: 100%; } html <div class="container"> <div class="wrapper"> <div id="overlay"></div> <div class="first-image"> <div class="jamey"> <p class="def"> JAMEY </p> <p class="rip-date">03.02.1997 - 09.18.2011</p> <p class="def2">Anonymous hate messages were posted on his Formspring account including one that claimed:</p> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="container2"> <div class="intro-div"> <div class="end-hate"> <h1>PUT AN END TO HATE.</h1> <p> ANYTHING WRITTEN ONLINE can become viral </p> <p> We believe that the way we behave online should be no different from the way that we behave in </p> <button type="button">JOIN CAMPAIGN</button> </div> </div>

    Read the article

  • .NET: Interface Problem VB.net Getter Only Interface

    - by snmcdonald
    Why does an interface override a class definition and violate class encapsulation? I have included two samples below, one in C# and one in VB.net? VB.net Module Module1 Sub Main() Dim testInterface As ITest = New TestMe Console.WriteLine(testInterface.Testable) ''// Prints False testInterface.Testable = True ''// Access to Private!!! Console.WriteLine(testInterface.Testable) ''// Prints True Dim testClass As TestMe = New TestMe Console.WriteLine(testClass.Testable) ''// Prints False ''//testClass.Testable = True ''// Compile Error Console.WriteLine(testClass.Testable) ''// Prints False End Sub End Module Public Class TestMe : Implements ITest Private m_testable As Boolean = False Public Property Testable As Boolean Implements ITest.Testable Get Return m_testable End Get Private Set(ByVal value As Boolean) m_testable = value End Set End Property End Class Interface ITest Property Testable As Boolean End Interface C# using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; namespace InterfaceCSTest { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { ITest testInterface = new TestMe(); Console.WriteLine(testInterface.Testable); testInterface.Testable = true; Console.WriteLine(testInterface.Testable); TestMe testClass = new TestMe(); Console.WriteLine(testClass.Testable); //testClass.Testable = true; Console.WriteLine(testClass.Testable); } } class TestMe : ITest { private bool m_testable = false; public bool Testable { get { return m_testable; } private set { m_testable = value; } } } interface ITest { bool Testable { get; set; } } } More Specifically How do I implement a interface in VB.net that will allow for a private setter. For example in C# I can declare: class TestMe : ITest { private bool m_testable = false; public bool Testable { get { return m_testable; } private set //No Compile Error here! { m_testable = value; } } } interface ITest { bool Testable { get; } } However, if I declare an interface property as readonly in VB.net I cannot create a setter. If I create a VB.net interface as just a plain old property then interface declarations will violate my encapsulation. Public Class TestMe : Implements ITest Private m_testable As Boolean = False Public ReadOnly Property Testable As Boolean Implements ITest.Testable Get Return m_testable End Get Private Set(ByVal value As Boolean) ''//Compile Error m_testable = value End Set End Property End Class Interface ITest ReadOnly Property Testable As Boolean End Interface So my question is, how do I define a getter only Interface in VB.net with proper encapsulation? I figured the first example would have been the best method. However, it appears as if interface definitions overrule class definitions. So I tried to create a getter only (Readonly) property like in C# but it does not work for VB.net. Maybe this is just a limitation of the language?

    Read the article

  • Purpose of Explicit Default Constructors

    - by Dennis Zickefoose
    I recently noticed a class in C++0x that calls for an explicit default constructor. However, I'm failing to come up with a scenario in which a default constructor can be called implicitly. It seems like a rather pointless specifier. I thought maybe it would disallow Class c; in favor of Class c = Class(); but that does not appear to be the case. Some relevant quotes from the C++0x FCD, since it is easier for me to navigate [similar text exists in C++03, if not in the same places] 12.3.1.3 [class.conv.ctor] A default constructor may be an explicit constructor; such a constructor will be used to perform default-initialization or value initialization (8.5). It goes on to provide an example of an explicit default constructor, but it simply mimics the example I provided above. 8.5.6 [decl.init] To default-initialize an object of type T means: — if T is a (possibly cv-qualified) class type (Clause 9), the default constructor for T is called (and the initialization is ill-formed if T has no accessible default constructor); 8.5.7 [decl.init] To value-initialize an object of type T means: — if T is a (possibly cv-qualified) class type (Clause 9) with a user-provided constructor (12.1), then the default constructor for T is called (and the initialization is ill-formed if T has no accessible default constructor); In both cases, the standard calls for the default constructor to be called. But that is what would happen if the default constructor were non-explicit. For completeness sake: 8.5.11 [decl.init] If no initializer is specified for an object, the object is default-initialized; From what I can tell, this just leaves conversion from no data. Which doesn't make sense. The best I can come up with would be the following: void function(Class c); int main() { function(); //implicitly convert from no parameter to a single parameter } But obviously that isn't the way C++ handles default arguments. What else is there that would make explicit Class(); behave differently from Class();? The specific example that generated this question was std::function [20.8.14.2 func.wrap.func]. It requires several converting constructors, none of which are marked explicit, but the default constructor is.

    Read the article

  • C# inheritance of fields

    - by Emil D
    This is probably a silly question, but here it goes.Imagine you have the following classes: public class C { } public class D : C { //A subclass of C } public class A { C argument; } Now, I want to have a class B, that inherits from A.This class would obviously inherit the "argument" field, but I wish to force the "argument" field in B to be of type D, rather than C.Since D inherits from C this shouldn't create any problems. So, how would achieve this in c# ?

    Read the article

  • validation using jquery

    - by fusion
    i'm trying to validate an html page using jquery, but nothing happens. it's a simple page, yet the textboxes aren't validated. this is the code: <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="style.css" /> <script type="text/javascript" src="~/jquery.js/"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="~/jquery-validate/jquery.validate.js/"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function(){ var validator = $("#submitForm").validate({ debug: true, rules: { author: "required", quote: "required" }, messages: { author: "Name of Author required" quote: "Please enter Quote" }, errorPlacement: function(error, element) { error.appendTo( element.parent().top() ); } ); }); </script> <body> <div class="container"> <div class="center_div"> <h2>Submit Your Quote</h2> <fieldset> <form id="submitForm" action="qinsert.php" method="post"> <div class="error" style="display:none"></div> <div class="field"> <label>Author: </label> <input name="author" type="text" class="required" minLength=3> <span class="error"></span> </div><br /> <div class="field"> <label>Quote: </label> <textarea name="quote" cols=22 class="required" minLength=5></textarea> <span class="error"></span> <br /> </div> <input id="button1" type="submit" value="Submit" class="submit" /><br /> <input id="button2" type="reset" value="Reset" /> </form> </fieldset> </div> </div> what is wrong with the code? thank you!

    Read the article

  • Ie7 float problems and hiperlinks problems

    - by Uffo
    Markup <ul class="navigation clearfix"> <li class="navigation-top"></li> <div class="first-holder" style="height:153px;"> <dl class="hold-items clearfix"> <dd class="clearfix with"><a href="http://site.com" title="Protokoll">Protokoll</a></dd> <dd class="with-hover"><a href="http://site.com" title="Mein/e Unternehmen">Mein/e Unternehmen</a></dd> <dd class="with"><a class="face-me" href="http://site.com" title="Erweiterte Suche">Erweiterte Suche</a></dd> <dd class="with"><a href="http://site.com" title="Abmelden">Abmelden</a></dd> </dl> </div><!--[end] /.first-holder--> <li class="navigation-bottom"></li> </ul><!--[end] /.navigation--> Css: .first-holder{height:304px;position:relative;width:178px;overflow:hidden;margin-bottom:0px;padding-bottom: 0px;} .hold-items{top:0px;position:absolute;} .navigation dd.with{line-height:38px;background:url('/images/sprite.png') no-repeat -334px -46px;width:162px;height:38px;padding-bottom:0px;overflow: hidden;} .navigation dd.with a{position:relative;outline:0;display:block;font-weight:bold;color:#3f78c0;padding-left:10px;line-height:38px;} .with-hover{background:url('/images/sprite.png') no-repeat -505px -47px;width:178px;height:38px;line-height:38px;overflow:none;} .with-hover a{position:relative;display:block;font-weight:bold;color:#fff;padding-left:10px} .navigation-top{background:url('/images/sprite.png') no-repeat -694px -46px;width:160px;height:36px;} .navigation-top a{display:block;outline:0;height:20px;padding-top:18px;padding-left:138px;} .navigation-top a span{display:block;background:url('/images/sprite.png') no-repeat -212px -65px;width:8px;height:6px;} .navigation-bottom{background:url('/images/sprite.png') no-repeat -784px -402px;width:160px;height:37px;} .navigation-bottom a{display:block;outline:0;height:20px;padding-top:18px;padding-left:138px;} .navigation-bottom a span{display:block;background:url('/images/sprite.png') no-repeat -212px -74px;width:8px;height:6px;} Also the links, are not clickable, if I click on a link in IE7 it doesn't do the action..it doesn't redirect me to the location. This is how it looks in IE7: http://screencast.com/t/MGY4NjljZjc This is how it look in IE8,Firefox,Chrome and so on http://screencast.com/t/MzhhMDQ1M What I'm doing wrong PS: .navigation-top a span and .navigation-bottom a span I'm using some where else, but that it's ok it works fine.

    Read the article

  • Select list auto update on any kind of change?

    - by Tom Irons
    I have a jQuery that when you click on a select option it will show the next one, but you have to click, you cant just use the down arrow or "tab" to the next option. I am wondering what options do I have to make this work? Here is my jQuery: function typefunction() { var itemTypes = jQuery('#type'); var select = this.value; itemTypes.change(function () { if ($(this).val() == '1-Hand') { $('.1-Hand').show(); $('.2-Hand').hide(); $('.off').hide(); $('.Armor').hide(); } else $('.1-Hand').hide(); if ($(this).val() == '2-Hand') { $('.2-Hand').show(); $('.1-Hand').hide(); $('.off').hide(); $('.Armor').hide(); } else $('.2-Hand').hide(); if ($(this).val() == 'Armor') { $('.Armor').show(); $('.2-Hand').hide(); $('.off').hide(); $('.1-Hand').hide(); } else $('.Armor').hide(); if ($(this).val() == 'Off-Hand') { $('.Off').show(); $('.2-Hand').hide(); $('.1-Hand').hide(); $('.Armor').hide(); } else $('.Off').hide(); if ($(this).val() == '1-Hand') { $('.one-hand-dps').show(); $('.item-armor').hide(); $('.two-hand-dps').hide(); } else $('.one-hand-dps').hide(); if ($(this).val() == '2-Hand') { $('.two-hand-dps').show(); $('.one-hand-dps').hide(); $('.item-armor').hide(); } else $('.two-hand-dps').hide(); if ($(this).val() == 'Armor') { $('.item-armor').show(); $('.one-hand-dps').hide(); $('.two-hand-dps').hide(); } else $('.item-armor').hide(); }); } And the HTML: <div class="input-group item"> <span class="input-group-addon">Type</span> <select id="type" name="type" class="form-control" onclick="typefunction(); itemstats(); Armor(); OffHand(); TwoHand();"> <option value="Any Type">Any Type</option> <option value="1-Hand">1-Hand</option> <option value="2-Hand">2-Hand</option> <option value="Armor">Armor</option> <option value="Off-Hand">Off-Hand</option> </select> </div> <div class="input-group item"> <span class="1-Hand input-group-addon" style="display: none;">Sub-Type</span> <select class="1-Hand form-control" name="sub[1]" style="display: none;"> <option value="All 1-Hand Item Types">All 1-Hand Item Types</option> <option>Axe</option> <option>Ceremonial Knife</option> <option>Hand Crossbow</option> <option>Dagger</option> <option>Fist Weapon</option> <option>Mace</option> <option>Mighty Weapon</option> <option>Spear</option> <option>Sword</option> <option>Wand</option> </select> </div> <div class="input-group"> <span class="2-Hand input-group-addon" style="display: none; ">Sub-Type</span> <select class="2-Hand form-control" name="sub[2]" style="display: none;"> <option>All 2-Hand Item Types</option> <option>Two-Handed Axe</option> <option>Bow</option> <option>Diabo</option> <option>Crossbow</option> <option>Two-Handed Mace</option> <option>Two-Handed Mighty Weapon</option> <option>Polearm</option> <option>Staff</option> <option>Two-Handed Sword</option> </select> </div> <div class="input-group"> <span class="Armor input-group-addon" style="display: none;">Sub-Type</span> <select class="Armor form-control" name="sub[3]" style="display:none;"> <option>All Armor Item Types</option> <option>Amulet</option> <option>Belt</option> <option>Boots</option> <option>Bracers</option> <option>Chest Armor</option> <option>Cloak</option> <option>Gloves</option> <option>Helm</option> <option>Pants</option> <option>Mighty Belt</option> <option>Ring</option> <option>Shoulders</option> <option>Spirit Stone</option> <option>Voodoo Mask</option> <option>Wizard Hat</option> </select> </div> <div class="input-group"> <span class="Off input-group-addon" style="display: none;">Sub-Type</span> <select class="Off form-control" name="sub[4]" style="display:none;"> <option>All Off-Hand Item Types</option> <option>Mojo</option> <option>Source</option> <option>Quiver</option> <option>Shield</option> </select> </div>

    Read the article

  • Jquery Session & Table Filtering

    - by Bry4n
    This is my Jquery <script type="text/javascript"> $(function() { var from = $.session("from"); var to = $.session("to"); var $th = $('#theTable').find('th'); // had to add the classes here to not grab the "td" inside those tables var $td = $('#theTable').find('td.bluedata,td.yellowdata'); $th.hide(); $td.hide(); if (to == "Select" || from == "Select") { // shortcut - nothing set, show everything $th.add($td).show(); return; } var filterArray = new Array(); filterArray[0] = to; filterArray[1] = from; $.each(filterArray, function(i){ if (filterArray[i].toString() == "Select") { filterArray[i] = ""; } }); $($th).each(function(){ if ($( this,":eq(0):contains('" + filterArray[0].toString() + "')") != null && $(this,":eq(1):contains('" + filterArray[1].toString() + "')") != null) { $(this).show(); } }); $($td).each(function(){ if ($( this,":eq(0):contains('" + filterArray[0].toString() + "')") != null && $(this,":eq(1):contains('" + filterArray[1].toString() + "')") != null) { $(this).show(); } }); }); </script> This is my table <table border="1" id="theTable"> <tr class="headers"> <th class="bluedata"height="20px" valign="top">63rd St. &amp; Malvern Av. Loop<BR/></th> <th class="yellowdata"height="20px" valign="top">52nd St. &amp; Lansdowne Av.<BR/></th> <th class="bluedata"height="20px" valign="top">Lancaster &amp; Girard Avs<BR/></th> <th class="yellowdata"height="20px" valign="top">40th St. &amp; Lancaster Av.<BR/></th> <th class="bluedata"height="20px" valign="top">36th &amp; Market Sts<BR/></th> <th class="bluedata"height="20px" valign="top">6th &amp; Market Sts<BR/></th> <th class="yellowdata"height="20px" valign="top">Juniper Station<BR/></th> </tr> <tr> <td class="bluedata"height="20px" title="63rd St. &amp; Malvern Av. Loop"> <table width="100%"><tr><td>12:17am</td></tr><tr><td>12:17am</td></tr><tr><td>12:47am</td></tr></table> </td> <td class="yellowdata"height="20px" title="52nd St. &amp; Lansdowne Av."> <table width="100%"><tr><td>12:17am</td></tr><tr><td>12:17am</td></tr><tr><td>12:47am</td></tr></table> </td> <td class="bluedata"height="20px" title="Lancaster &amp; Girard Avs"> <table width="100%"><tr><td>12:17am</td></tr><tr><td>12:17am</td></tr><tr><td>12:47am</td></tr></table> </td> <td class="yellowdata"height="20px" title="40th St. &amp; Lancaster Av."> <table width="100%"><tr><td>12:17am</td></tr><tr><td>12:17am</td></tr><tr><td>12:47am</td></tr></table> </td> <td class="bluedata"height="20px" title="36th &amp; Market Sts"> <table width="100%"><tr><td>12:17am</td></tr><tr><td>12:17am</td></tr><tr><td>12:47am</td></tr></table> </td> <td class="bluedata"height="20px" title="6th &amp; Market Sts"> <table width="100%"><tr><td>12:17am</td></tr><tr><td>12:17am</td></tr><tr><td>12:47am</td></tr></table> </td> <td class="bluedata"height="20px" title="Juniper Station"> <table width="100%"><tr><td>12:17am</td></tr><tr><td>12:17am</td></tr><tr><td>12:47am</td></tr></table> </td> </tr> </table> I have asked questions on here before and I have had success in converting textbox values to dropdown changes. However this is a bit different. I am using the sessions plugin (which works fine). On one page I have a set of normal drop downs, on submit you get taken to a separate page which runs the function above, however the rows/columns all show and they don't seem to filter at all.

    Read the article

  • Replace click() with document.ready() in jquery....

    - by bala3569
    I downloaded jquery effects example and all effects are appearing only onclick but i want it to be executed on document.ready() and continue... <script type="text/javascript"> var ImgIdx = 2;//To mark which image will be select next function PreloadImg(){ $.ImagePreload("images/im2.jpg"); $.ImagePreload("images/im3.jpg"); $.ImagePreload("images/im4.jpg"); $.ImagePreload("images/im5.jpg"); } $(document).ready(function(){ PreloadImg(); $(".SlashEff ul li").click(function(){ $(".Slash").ImageSwitch({Type:$(this).attr("rel"), NewImage:"images/im"+ImgIdx+".jpg", speed: 4000 }); ImgIdx++; if(ImgIdx>5) ImgIdx = 1; }); }); </script> and my <div class="SlashEff"> <ul> <li class="TryFadeIn" rel="FadeIn">Fade in</li> <li class="TryFlyIn" rel="FlyIn">Fly in</li> <li class="TryFlyOut" rel="FlyOut">Fly out</li> <li class="TryFlipIn" rel="FlipIn">Flip in</li> <li class="TryFlipOut" rel="FlipOut">Flip out</li> <li class="TryScroll" rel="ScrollIn">Scroll in</li> <li class="TryScroll" rel="ScrollOut">Scroll out</li> <li class="TrySingleDoor" rel="SingleDoor">Single Door</li> <li class="TryDoubleDoor" rel="DoubleDoor">Double Door</li> </ul> </div> Here is the link http://www.hieu.co.uk/blog/index.php/imageswitch/ I tried this, $(document).ready(function(){ PreloadImg(); $(".Slash").ImageSwitch({Type:$(this).attr("rel"), NewImage:"images/im"+ImgIdx+".jpg", speed: 4000 }); ImgIdx++; if(ImgIdx>5) ImgIdx = 1; }); I tried this but it gets executed only once.... I want to execute this every 5000ms... Is this possible...

    Read the article

  • Factory Method and Cyclic Dependancy

    - by metdos
    If I'm not wrong, because of its nature in factory method there is cyclic dependency: Base class needs to know subclasses because it creates them, and subclasses need to know base class. Having cyclic dependency is bad programming practice, is not it? Practically I implemented a factory, I have problem above, even I added #ifndef MYCLASS_H #define MYCLASS_H #endif I'm still getting Compiler Error C2504 'class' : base class undefined And this error disappers when I remove subclass include from base class header.

    Read the article

  • Question about design (inheritance, polymorphism)

    - by Dan
    Hi, I have a question about a problem I'm struggling with. Hope you can bear with me. Imagine I have an Object class representing the base class of a hierarchy of physical objects. Later I inherit from it to create an Object1D, Object2D and Object3D classes. Each of these derived classes will have some specific methods and attributes. For example, the 3d object might have functionality to download a 3d model to be used by a renderer. So I'd have something like this: class Object {}; class Object1D : public Object { Point mPos; }; class Object2D : public Object { ... }; class Object3D : public Object { Model mModel; }; Now I'd have a separate class called Renderer, which simply takes an Object as argument and well, renders it :-) In a similar way, I'd like to support different kinds of renderers. For instance, I could have a default one that every object could rely on, and then provide other specific renderers for some kind of objects: class Renderer {}; // Default one class Renderer3D : public Renderer {}; And here comes my problem. A renderer class needs to get an Object as an argument, for example in the constructor in order to retrieve whatever data it needs to render the object. So far so good. But a Renderer3D would need to get an Object3D argument, in order to get not only the basic attributes but also the specific attributes of a 3d object. Constructors would look like this: CRenderer(Object& object); CRenderer3D(Object3D& object); Now how do I specify this in a generic way? Or better yet, is there a better way to design this? I know I could rely on RTTI or similar but I'd like to avoid this if possible as I feel there is probably a better way to deal with this. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • virtual function

    - by hitech
    class a { virtual void foo(void) ; }; class b : public a { public: virtual void foo(void) { cout<< "class b"; } }; int main ( ) { class a *b_ptr = new b ; b_ptr->foo(); } please guide me why the b_ptr-foo() will not call the foo() function of the class b?

    Read the article

  • Callback function in jquery doesn't seem to work......

    - by Pandiya Chendur
    I use the following jquery pagination plugin and i got the error a.parentNode is undefined when i executed it... <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { getRecordspage(1, 5); $(".pager").pagination(17, { callback: pagechange, current_page: '0', items_per_page: '5', num_display_entries : '5', next_text: 'Next', prev_text: 'Prev', num_edge_entries: '1' }); }); function pagechange() { $("#ResultsDiv").empty(); $("#ResultsDiv").css('display', 'none'); getRecordspage($(this).text(), 5); } function getRecordspage(curPage, pagSize) { $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "Default.aspx/GetRecords", data: "{'currentPage':" + curPage + ",'pagesize':" + pagSize + "}", contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", dataType: "json", success: function(jsonObj) { var strarr = jsonObj.d.split('##'); var jsob = jQuery.parseJSON(strarr[0]); var divs = ''; $.each(jsob.Table, function(i, employee) { divs += '<div class="resultsdiv"><br /><span class="resultName">' + employee.Emp_Name + '</span><span class="resultfields" style="padding-left:100px;">Category&nbsp;:</span>&nbsp;<span class="resultfieldvalues">' + employee.Desig_Name + '</span><br /><br /><span id="SalaryBasis" class="resultfields">Salary Basis&nbsp;:</span>&nbsp;<span class="resultfieldvalues">' + employee.SalaryBasis + '</span><span class="resultfields" style="padding-left:25px;">Salary&nbsp;:</span>&nbsp;<span class="resultfieldvalues">' + employee.FixedSalary + '</span><span style="font-size:110%;font-weight:bolder;padding-left:25px;">Address&nbsp;:</span>&nbsp;<span class="resultfieldvalues">' + employee.Address + '</span></div>'; }); $("#ResultsDiv").append(divs).show('slow'); $(".resultsdiv:even").addClass("resultseven"); $(".resultsdiv").hover(function() { $(this).addClass("resultshover"); }, function() { $(this).removeClass("resultshover"); }); } }); } </script> and in my page, <div id="ResultsDiv" style="display:none;"> </div> <div id="pager" class="pager"> </div> Any suggestion....

    Read the article

  • Ruby - How to remove a setter on an object

    - by Markus Orrelly
    Given a class like this: class B class << self attr_accessor :var end end Suppose I can't modify the original source code of class B. How might I go about removing the setter on the class variable var? I've tried using something like B.send("unset_method", "var="), but that doesn't work (nor does remove_method, or overwriting that method with a var= method that doesn't do anything). Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • help me "dry" out this .net XML serialization code

    - by Sarah Vessels
    I have a base collection class and a child collection class, each of which are serializable. In a test, I discovered that simply having the child class's ReadXml method call base.ReadXml resulted in an InvalidCastException later on. First, here's the class structure: Base Class // Collection of Row objects [Serializable] [XmlRoot("Rows")] public class Rows : IList<Row>, ICollection<Row>, IEnumerable<Row>, IEquatable<Rows>, IXmlSerializable { public Collection<Row> Collection { get; protected set; } public void ReadXml(XmlReader reader) { reader.ReadToFollowing(XmlNodeName); do { using (XmlReader rowReader = reader.ReadSubtree()) { var row = new Row(); row.ReadXml(rowReader); Collection.Add(row); } } while (reader.ReadToNextSibling(XmlNodeName)); } } Derived Class // Acts as a collection of SpecificRow objects, which inherit from Row. Uses the same // Collection<Row> that Rows defines which is fine since SpecificRow : Row. [Serializable] [XmlRoot("MySpecificRowList")] public class SpecificRows : Rows, IXmlSerializable { public new void ReadXml(XmlReader reader) { // Trying to just do base.ReadXml(reader) causes a cast exception later reader.ReadToFollowing(XmlNodeName); do { using (XmlReader rowReader = reader.ReadSubtree()) { var row = new SpecificRow(); row.ReadXml(rowReader); Collection.Add(row); } } while (reader.ReadToNextSibling(XmlNodeName)); } public new Row this[int index] { // The cast in this getter is what causes InvalidCastException if I try // to call base.ReadXml from this class's ReadXml get { return (Row)Collection[index]; } set { Collection[index] = value; } } } And here's the code that causes a runtime InvalidCastException if I do not use the version of ReadXml shown in SpecificRows above (i.e., I get the exception if I just call base.ReadXml from within SpecificRows.ReadXml): TextReader reader = new StringReader(serializedResultStr); SpecificRows deserializedResults = (SpecificRows)xs.Deserialize(reader); SpecificRow = deserializedResults[0]; // this throws InvalidCastException So, the code above all compiles and runs exception-free, but it bugs me that Rows.ReadXml and SpecificRows.ReadXml are essentially the same code. The value of XmlNodeName and the new Row()/new SpecificRow() are the differences. How would you suggest I extract out all the common functionality of both versions of ReadXml? Would it be silly to create some generic class just for one method? Sorry for the lengthy code samples, I just wanted to provide the reason I can't simply call base.ReadXml from within SpecificRows.

    Read the article

  • How to make inner UL list not inherit from outer UL List in CSS

    - by Minghui Yu
    For the HTML List below, I need to add a background image only to the LI of the outer list. (aka the one with class "menu-mlid-594 dhtml-menu expanded start-collapsed") HTML codes are: <li class="menu-mlid-594 dhtml-menu expanded start-collapsed ">About the Collection<ul class="menu"><li class="leaf first dhtml-menu ">By Theme</li><li class="leaf last dhtml-menu ">By Individual</li></ul></li> How can I do that? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • In Sphinx, can I register a bunch of keywords that should always be translated into links?

    - by Ross Rogers
    My doc strings have references to other python classes that I've defined. Every time Sphinx encounters one of these classes, I want it to insert a link to the documentation for that other class. Is this possible in Sphinx? Specifically, I have a doc string like: '''This class contains a bunch of Foo objects''' I could write: '''This class contains a bunch of :class:`~foo.Foo` objects''' but I would prefer that Sphinx finds all text matching Foo and makes it seem as though I had typed :class:~foo.Foo

    Read the article

  • can not access MovieClip properties in flashDevelop

    - by numerical25
    I know there is something I am doing wrong. In my controls I have keydown events that control my hero. As of right now, I am trying to rotate my hero but he refuses to turn . Below is my Hero Class, my control class, and gameobject class. pretty much all the classes associate with the controls class. package com.Objects { import com.Objects.GameObject; /** * ... * @author Anthony Gordon */ [Embed(source='../../../bin/Assets.swf', symbol='OuterRim')] public class Hero extends GameObject { public function Hero() { } } } Here is my Controls class. This is the class where I am trying to rotate my hero but he doesnt. The keydown event does work cause I trace it. package com.Objects { import com.Objects.Hero; import flash.events.*; import flash.display.MovieClip; /** * ... * @author Anthony Gordon */ public class Controls extends GameObject { private var aKeyPress:Array; public var ship:Hero; public function Controls(ship:Hero) { this.ship = ship; IsDisplay = false; aKeyPress = new Array(); engine.sr.addEventListener(KeyboardEvent.KEY_DOWN, keyDownListener); engine.sr.addEventListener(KeyboardEvent.KEY_UP,keyUpListener); } private function keyDownListener(e:KeyboardEvent):void { //trace("down e.keyCode=" + e.keyCode); aKeyPress[e.keyCode] = true; trace(e.keyCode); } private function keyUpListener(e:KeyboardEvent):void { //trace("up e.keyCode=" + e.keyCode); aKeyPress[e.keyCode]=false; } override public function UpdateObject():void { Update(); } private function Update():void { if (aKeyPress[37])//Key press left ship.rotation += 3,trace(ship.rotation ); ///DOESNT ROtate }//End Controls } } Here is GameObject Class package com.Objects { import com.Objects.Engine; import com.Objects.IGameObject; import flash.display.MovieClip; /** * ... * @author Anthony Gordon */ public class GameObject extends MovieClip implements IGameObject { private var isdisplay:Boolean = true; private var garbage:Boolean; public static var engine:Engine; public var layer:Number = 0; public function GameObject() { } public function UpdateObject():void { } public function GarbageCollection():void { } public function set Garbage(garb:Boolean):void { garbage = garb; } public function get Garbage():Boolean { return garbage } public function get IsDisplay():Boolean { return isdisplay; } public function set IsDisplay(display:Boolean):void { isdisplay = display; } public function set Layer(l:Number):void { layer = l; } public function get Layer():Number { return layer } } }

    Read the article

  • Shallow copying a list with downcasting

    - by Mohit
    I have the class herichary as follows CEntity----CNode---CElement I have a class Nodes : List<Cnode> and Class Elements : List<Element> Node class contain common item common across different project Element class has item specific to a project. I have to shallow copy the element list into the node list (basically down casting the elements to nodes)

    Read the article

  • Cannot interact with checkbox in FireFox or Chrome. Works in IE.

    - by Darxide
    Title says it all. Here's the code: <div id="regpage"> <form action="" method="post"> <fieldset style="border:none;"> <div class="label">Username:</div> <input type="text" name="username" class="item" value="" /><br /> <div class="caption">Must be 5-15 characters</div><br /> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <div class="label">Password:</div> <input type="password" name="password" class="item" value="" /><br /> <div class="caption">Must be 6-20 characters</div><br /> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <div class="label">Email:</div> <input type="text" name="email" class="item" value="" /><br /> <div class="caption">Valid email address is required</div><br /> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <input name="terms" type="checkbox" id="terms" value="agree" /><div class="caption2"><label for="terms">I agree to the terms and conditions</label></div> <p><input type="submit" name="register" value="Register" id="register" style="float:left;border:1px solid #999;background:#E4E4E4;margin-top:5px;" /></p><br /> </fieldset> </form> </div> And the id "regpage" is definded in the style.css as: #regpage { width: 356px; height: 150px; color: #000000; font-family: "Tahoma", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; } If I move the checkbox OUT of it works just fine. But inside it will not interact in Mozilla. I've even tried adding onclick='this.checked="checked"' and it still does not interact. You can click until your blue in the face and nothing will happen. What's the deal! This is REALLY driving me batty.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283  | Next Page >