Search Results

Search found 4815 results on 193 pages for 'parameterized queries'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 28/193 | < Previous Page | 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35  | Next Page >

  • Custom ADO.NET provider to intercept and modify sql queries.

    - by Faisal
    Our client has an application that stores blobs in database which has now grown enough to impact the performance of SQL Server. To overcome this issue, we are planning to offload all blobs to file system and leave the path of file in a new column in user table. Like if user has a table docs with columns id, name and content (blob); we would ask him to add a new column 'filepath' in this table. Our client is willing to make this change in this database. But when it comes to changing the sql queries to read and write into this table, they are not ready to accep this. Actually, they don't want any change that results in recompilation and deployment. Now we are planning to write a custom ADO.NET provider that will intercept the select queries add a column 'filepath' at the end of the select statement retieve the result set and modify the 'content' column value based on 'filepath' value Is there any use case that you think will certainly fail with this approach? I know this sounds dirty but do we have a better way?

    Read the article

  • How to set the delay between update queries in Mysql so that every query get executed succesfully?

    - by OM The Eternity
    Hi All I have to the Update query mulitple times for different parameters using for loop in my PHP Script, now the problem Is Whenever I do it, only my last query get executed, all the previous queries seems to be skipped. the loop goes like this: foreach($cntrlflagset as $cntrlordoc => $cntrlorflag){ for($t=0;$t<count($cntrlorflag);$t++){ $userlvl = "controller"; $docflag = 1; $postfix = "created"; $createdoc->updatedocseeflags($cntrlorflag[$t],$docflag,$cntrlordoc,$postfix,$userlvl); $docflag = 2; $postfix = "midlvl"; $createdoc->updatedocseeflags($cntrlorflag[$t],$docflag,$cntrlordoc,$postfix,$userlvl); } } Here, the called function $createdoc-updatedocseeflags($cntrlorflag[$t],$docflag,$cntrlordoc,$postfix,$userlvl); Contains the Update query: $query = "UPDATE tbl_docuserstatus SET"; //if($flag != ""){ $query .= " docseeflag_".$postfix." = '".$flag."'"; //} $query .= " WHERE doc_id = '".$doc_id."' AND user_id = '".$user_id."'"; if($userlvl == "midlvl"){ $query .= " AND doc_midlvluser = '1'"; }elseif($userlvl == "finallvl"){ $query .= " AND doc_finallvluser = '1'"; }elseif($userlvl == "creator"){ $query .= " AND doc_creator = '1'"; }elseif($userlvl == "controller"){ $query .= " AND doc_controller = '1'"; }elseif($docarchive == 1){ $query .= " AND doc_controller = '1'"; } So could some one tell me, How to set the delay between update queries in Mysql so that every query get executed succesfully? Thanks In Advance

    Read the article

  • Best C# database communication technique

    - by user65439
    A few days ago I read a reply to a question where people said that the days of writing queries within your c# code are long gone. I'm not sure what the specific person meant with the comment but it got me thinking. At the company I'm currently working at we maintain an assembly containing all the queries to the database (let's call it Queries), this assembly is reference by a QueryService (Retrieve the correct queries) assembly which in turn is referenced by a UnitOfWork assembly (The database connector classes, we have different connector classes for SQL, MySQL etc.). We use these three assemblies to perform operations on our database and all queries/commands are written in our C# code. Is there a better way to communicate with the database and is there a better way to communicate with different database types?

    Read the article

  • How do I add a condition to all ActiveRecords Queries for a particular model?

    - by Kyle West
    I am using the sentient_user gem to have access to the current_user object in my application. I want to override the default ActiveRecordBase queries to scope them to the current user. For instance, I don't want my users looking at, deleting, modifying other user's orders. I feel like I should be able to override a single (or couple) ActiveRecordBase methods to accomplish this, but I don't know which or how. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Is there any performance advantage to using DirectorySearcher over SearchRequest for LDAP queries.

    - by WayneC
    I understand that System.DirectoryServices is a "layer above" System.DirectoryServices.Protocols and abstracts some of the complexity. Are there any other advantages, performance or otherwise, to using System.DirectoryServices.DirectorySearcher vs. System.DirectoryServices.Protocols.SearchRequest for LDAP queries from .NET. What criteria would cause you to use one approach over the other?

    Read the article

  • How can I adjust the CommandTImeout in DbFit for long running queries?

    - by Ben Farmer
    Is there any way to increase the CommandTimeout for DbFit queries? I have a long running stored procedure that times out when running it in a DbFit Test. It's possible for the procedure to run for a really long time (processing millions of records) and would like to have DbFit wait until it's completed, even if it takes several minutes. We are using the latest version of FitSharp (downloaded it yesterday) and use the version of DbFit that is included with FitSharp.

    Read the article

  • What's the different between these 2 mysql queries? one using left join

    - by Lyon
    Hi, I see people using LEFT JOIN in their mysql queries to fetch data from two tables. But I normally do it without left join. Is there any differences besides the syntax, e.g. performance? Here's my normal query style: SELECT * FROM table1 as tbl1, table2 as tbl2 WHERE tbl1.id=tbl2.table_id as compared to SELECT * FROM table1 as tbl1 LEFT JOIN table2 as tbl2 on tbl1.id=tbl2.id Personally I prefer the first style...hmm..

    Read the article

  • Are there any TFS 2010 Dashboards that support multi-project queries?

    - by devlife
    Does anyone know of a TFS 2010 Dashboard that is able to utilize multi-project queries? Our group has several distinct projects that must be managed at the same time. TFS itself supports this. Simply by excluding the Project = @Project (or whatever) we can get back the results we're looking for. Our issue is that we would like to find a nice dashboard (like Telerik Work Item Manager) that also supports this.

    Read the article

  • Whats better query with long where in condition or many small queries?

    - by DCrystal
    Maybe it's a little dumb, but i'm just not sure what is better. If i have to check about 30k rows in db for existanse, what i'd do? #1 - one query select id from table1 where name in (smth1,smth2...{till 30k}) #2 - many queries select id from table1 where name=smth1 Though, perfomance is not the goal, i don't want to go down with mysql either ;) Maybe, any other solutions will be more suitable... Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Can I make this two LINQ queries into one query only?

    - by Holli
    From a List of builtAgents I need all items with OptimPriority == 1 and only 5 items with OptimPriority == 0. I do this with two seperate queries but I wonder if I could make this with only one query. IEnumerable<Agent> priorityAgents = from pri in builtAgents where pri.OptimPriority == 1 select pri; IEnumerable<Agent> otherAgents = (from oth in builtAgents where oth.OptimPriority == 0 select oth).Take(5);

    Read the article

  • What is the difference between these 2 XML LINQ Queries?

    - by Jon
    I have the 2 following LINQ queries and I haven't quite got my head around LINQ so what is the difference between the 2 approaches below? Is there a circumstance where one approach is better than another? ChequeDocument.Descendants("ERRORS").Where(x=>(string)x.Attribute("D") == "").Count(); (from x in ChequeDocument.Descendants("ERRORS") where (string)x.Attribute("D") == "" select x).Count())

    Read the article

  • How to find the worst performing queries in MS SQL Server 2008?

    - by Thomas Bratt
    How to find the worst performing queries in MS SQL Server 2008? I found the following example but it does not seem to work: SELECT TOP 5 obj.name, max_logical_reads, max_elapsed_time FROM sys.dm_exec_query_stats a CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_sql_text(sql_handle) hnd INNER JOIN sys.sysobjects obj on hnd.objectid = obj.id ORDER BY max_logical_reads DESC Taken from: http://www.sqlservercurry.com/2010/03/top-5-costly-stored-procedures-in-sql.html

    Read the article

  • Can MySQL reasonably perform queries on billions of rows?

    - by haxney
    I am planning on storing scans from a mass spectrometer in a MySQL database and would like to know whether storing and analyzing this amount of data is remotely feasible. I know performance varies wildly depending on the environment, but I'm looking for the rough order of magnitude: will queries take 5 days or 5 milliseconds? Input format Each input file contains a single run of the spectrometer; each run is comprised of a set of scans, and each scan has an ordered array of datapoints. There is a bit of metadata, but the majority of the file is comprised of arrays 32- or 64-bit ints or floats. Host system |----------------+-------------------------------| | OS | Windows 2008 64-bit | | MySQL version | 5.5.24 (x86_64) | | CPU | 2x Xeon E5420 (8 cores total) | | RAM | 8GB | | SSD filesystem | 500 GiB | | HDD RAID | 12 TiB | |----------------+-------------------------------| There are some other services running on the server using negligible processor time. File statistics |------------------+--------------| | number of files | ~16,000 | | total size | 1.3 TiB | | min size | 0 bytes | | max size | 12 GiB | | mean | 800 MiB | | median | 500 MiB | | total datapoints | ~200 billion | |------------------+--------------| The total number of datapoints is a very rough estimate. Proposed schema I'm planning on doing things "right" (i.e. normalizing the data like crazy) and so would have a runs table, a spectra table with a foreign key to runs, and a datapoints table with a foreign key to spectra. The 200 Billion datapoint question I am going to be analyzing across multiple spectra and possibly even multiple runs, resulting in queries which could touch millions of rows. Assuming I index everything properly (which is a topic for another question) and am not trying to shuffle hundreds of MiB across the network, is it remotely plausible for MySQL to handle this? UPDATE: additional info The scan data will be coming from files in the XML-based mzML format. The meat of this format is in the <binaryDataArrayList> elements where the data is stored. Each scan produces = 2 <binaryDataArray> elements which, taken together, form a 2-dimensional (or more) array of the form [[123.456, 234.567, ...], ...]. These data are write-once, so update performance and transaction safety are not concerns. My naïve plan for a database schema is: runs table | column name | type | |-------------+-------------| | id | PRIMARY KEY | | start_time | TIMESTAMP | | name | VARCHAR | |-------------+-------------| spectra table | column name | type | |----------------+-------------| | id | PRIMARY KEY | | name | VARCHAR | | index | INT | | spectrum_type | INT | | representation | INT | | run_id | FOREIGN KEY | |----------------+-------------| datapoints table | column name | type | |-------------+-------------| | id | PRIMARY KEY | | spectrum_id | FOREIGN KEY | | mz | DOUBLE | | num_counts | DOUBLE | | index | INT | |-------------+-------------| Is this reasonable?

    Read the article

  • How optimize queries with fully qualified names in t-sql?

    - by tomaszs
    Whe I call: select * from Database.dbo.Table where NAME = 'cat' It takes: 200 ms And when I change database to Database in Management Studio and call it without fully qualified name it's much faster: select * from Table where NAME = 'cat' It takes: 17 ms Is there any way to make fully qualified queries faster without changing database?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35  | Next Page >