Search Results

Search found 11197 results on 448 pages for 'related'.

Page 28/448 | < Previous Page | 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35  | Next Page >

  • How is DNS related to Active Directory and what are some common configurations that I should be aware of?

    - by MDMarra
    Please note that I do know the answer to this and have provided one below. I see a lot of newer systems administrators that don't understand the contents of my answer, so I hope that all of the beginner AD DNS questions will be closed as a duplicate of this. If you have a minor improvement, feel free to edit my answer. If you can provide a more comprehensive complete answer, feel free to leave one. How is DNS related to Active Directory and what are some common configurations that I should be aware of?

    Read the article

  • Change master table PK and update related table FK (changing PK from Autoincrement to UUID on Mysql)

    - by eleonzx
    I have two related tables: Groups and Clients. Clients belongs to Groups so I have a foreign key "group_id" that references the group a client belongs to. I'm changing the Group id from an autoincrement to a UUID. So what I need is to generate a UUID for each Group and update the Clients table at once to reflect the changes and keep the records related. Is there a way to do this with multiple-table update on MySQL? Adding tables definitions for clarification. CREATE TABLE `groups` ( `id` char(36) NOT NULL, `name` varchar(255) DEFAULT NULL, `created` datetime DEFAULT NULL, `modified` datetime DEFAULT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8$$ CREATE TABLE `clients` ( `id` char(36) NOT NULL, `name` varchar(255) NOT NULL, `group_id` char(36) DEFAULT NULL, `active` tinyint(1) DEFAULT '1' PRIMARY KEY (`id`), KEY `fkgp` (`group_id`), CONSTRAINT `fkgp` FOREIGN KEY (`group_id`) REFERENCES `groups` (`id`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE CASCADE ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8$$

    Read the article

  • 301 redirects - can we not delete old pages?

    - by KBS
    First time here :) We have a page on the site which ranks well for an SEO term (top 5) but contains old information. We have added a new page but Google doesn't rank it that well. Information on these pages is time sensitive. Old: example.com/2013-related-information.html New: example.com/2014-related-information.html Obvious solution is to delete old page and do a 301 redirect to the new page. Now, can we still keep the old page by giving it a new URL. Step1: example.com/2013-related-information.html is redirect to example.com/2014-related-information.html Step2: example.com/2014-related-information.html is recreated with a new address such as example.com/new-2013-related-information.html What we are trying to do is to send the user to the fresh page but still not wasting the record copy if someone wants to go and dig up old page. Would appreciate help!! Cheers

    Read the article

  • Can we 301 redirect to a new page, but still publish the old content somewhere else?

    - by KBS
    We have a page on the site which ranks well for an SEO term (top 5) but contains old information. We have added a new page but Google doesn't rank it that well. Information on these pages is time sensitive. Old: example.com/2013-related-information.html New: example.com/2014-related-information.html Obvious solution is to delete old page and do a 301 redirect to the new page. Now, can we still keep the old page by giving it a new URL. example.com/2013-related-information.html is redirected to example.com/2014-related-information.html example.com/2014-related-information.html is recreated with a new address such as example.com/new-2013-related-information.html What we are trying to do is to send the user to the fresh page but still not destroying the record copy if someone wants to go and dig up the old information.

    Read the article

  • Django Inline formset for editing multiple related records at once - the right way to go?

    - by Bert
    Hi, When using inline formsets, how does one do paging? I'm using django 1.1. The situation I'm in, is that the user needs to be able to edit the related objects quickly and easily (which is why I think I should be using an inline formset). However, there can be a more than a hundred objects to edit, which makes a pretty large formset, so paging would make sense. Is there a better way to be doing this? Thanks Bert

    Read the article

  • How to add action related to a business object in Metawidget?

    - by Gulcan
    I use Netbeans 6.8 and try to obtain user interface by using metawidget and JPA. I cannot say @Action public void save( ActionEvent event ) { mSearchMetawidget.save(); } This annotation gives "incompatible types" error when I add following import. import org.metawidget.inspector.impl.actionstyle.Action; What to do? How can I add an action related to my User entity. I want to do "register" action. Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Performance Related features for migration from .net 2003 Framework 1.1 to .net 2008 framework 3.5?

    - by KuldipMCA
    I am work on VB.net 2003 Framework 1.1 for last 3.5 years in windows Application. We are currently migrating to VB.net 2008 framework 3.5, but i don't know about the features which related to ADO.net and which is important to performance. I know linq to SQL but our architecture is made in .net 2003 so we should follow this. Any features which is very important to enhance the performance?

    Read the article

  • How to find similar/related text with Zend Lucene?

    - by Arty
    Say I need to make searching for related titles just like stackoverflow does before you add your question or digg.com before submitting news. I didn't find a way how to do this with Zend Lucene. There are setSlop method for queries, but as I understand, it doesn't help. Is there any way to do this kind of searches?

    Read the article

  • Which memory related Tomcat JVM startup parameters are worth tuning?

    - by knorv
    I'm trying to understand the fine art of tuning Tomcat memory settings. In this quest I have the following three questions: Which memory related JVM startup parameters are worth setting when running Tomcat? Why? What are useful rule-of-thumbs when fine-tuning the memory settings for a Tomcat installation? How do you monitor the memory consumption of your live Tomcat installation?

    Read the article

  • Can you suggest some UI related flex 3 interview questions for a senior pos?

    - by mohan talluri
    Our Company is looking for a sr.flex developer. As part of interview process customized UI understanding and implementation is also included. I am Usability&design Lead for the same product team have some understanding of flex 3 but am not sure if pure UI/usability questions can be answered by flex developer. So can you suggest some UI related questions to see if he/she has competency to refer a prototype(html/mockup's) and build the same UI in flex.

    Read the article

  • Symfony, in remote host: Error 500. Unknown record property / related component "algorithm" on "sfGu

    - by user248959
    Hi, after deploying, i get the error below after loggingin. Sf 1.3, sfDoctrineGuardPlugin. And i have this schema.yml in config/doctrine: Usuario: inheritance: extends: sfGuardUser type: simple columns: username: type: string(128) notnull: false unique: true nombre_apellidos: string(60) sexo: string(5) fecha_nac: date provincia: string(60) localidad: string(255) email_address: string(255) fotografia: string(255) avatar: string(255) avatar_mensajes: string(255) relations: Usuario: local: user1_id foreign: user2_id refClass: AmigoUsuario equal: true 500 | Internal Server Error | Doctrine_Record_UnknownPropertyException Unknown record property / related component "algorithm" on "sfGuardUser" stack trace * at () in SF_ROOT_DIR/lib/vendor/symfony/lib/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/lib/vendor/doctrine/Doctrine/Record/Filter/Standard.php line 55 ... 52. */ 53. public function filterGet(Doctrine_Record $record, $name) 54. { 55. throw new Doctrine_Record_UnknownPropertyException(sprintf('Unknown record property / related component "%s" on "%s"', $name, get_class($record))); 56. } 57. } * at Doctrine_Record_Filter_Standard->filterGet(object('sfGuardUser'), 'algorithm') in SF_ROOT_DIR/lib/vendor/symfony/lib/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/lib/vendor/doctrine/Doctrine/Record.php line 1382 ... 1379. $success = false; 1380. foreach ($this->_table->getFilters() as $filter) { 1381. try { 1382. $value = $filter->filterGet($this, $fieldName); 1383. $success = true; 1384. } catch (Doctrine_Exception $e) {} 1385. } * at Doctrine_Record->_get('algorithm', 1) in SF_ROOT_DIR/lib/vendor/symfony/lib/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/lib/vendor/doctrine/Doctrine/Record.php line 1337 ... 1334. return $this->$accessor($load); 1335. } 1336. } 1337. return $this->_get($fieldName, $load); 1338. } 1339. 1340. protected function _get($fieldName, $load = true) * at Doctrine_Record->get('algorithm') in SF_ROOT_DIR/lib/vendor/symfony/lib/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/lib/record/sfDoctrineRecord.class.php line 212 ... 209. return call_user_func_array( 210. array($this, $verb), 211. array_merge(array($entityName), $arguments) 212. ); 213. } else { 214. $failed = true; 215. } * at sfDoctrineRecord->__call(array(object('sfGuardUser'), 'get'), array('algorithm')) in n/a line n/a ... * at sfGuardUser->getAlgorithm('getAlgorithm', array()) in SF_ROOT_DIR/plugins/sfDoctrineGuardPlugin/lib/model/doctrine/PluginsfGuardUser.class.php line 96 ... 93. */ 94. public function checkPasswordByGuard($password) 95. { 96. $algorithm = $this->getAlgorithm(); 97. if (false !== $pos = strpos($algorithm, '::')) 98. { 99. $algorithm = array(substr($algorithm, 0, $pos), substr($algorithm, $pos + 2)); * at PluginsfGuardUser->checkPasswordByGuard() in SF_ROOT_DIR/plugins/sfDoctrineGuardPlugin/lib/model/doctrine/PluginsfGuardUser.class.php line 83 ... 80. } 81. else 82. { 83. return $this->checkPasswordByGuard($password); 84. } 85. } 86. * at PluginsfGuardUser->checkPassword('m') in SF_ROOT_DIR/lib/sfGuardValidatorUserByEmail.class.php line 28 ... 25. { 26. // password is ok? 27. 28. if ($user->checkPassword($password)) 29. { 30. 31. //die("entro"); * at sfGuardValidatorUserByEmail->doClean('m') Any idea? Javi

    Read the article

  • Svn: revert file content changes without reverting any related mergeinfo?

    - by George Hawkins
    If you've done a merge you may find, before committing the changes, that actually you don't want to accept any of the changes merged into one of the affected files. So you do e.g.: $ svn revert foo.c However this also seems to revert the mergeinfo related to this file. So when you do a subsequent merge it will merge in exactly the same changes again. Rather than revert one could do: $ svn cat foo.c foo.c But this doesn't seem like the right way to do things? Is there something that more clearly indicates what I'm trying to achieve, i.e. to say "consider the merge done for this file but don't change its contents"?

    Read the article

  • Doctrine: Relating a model to itself using a link table, like "This event is related to to the following other events"

    - by mattalexx
    So in English, the relationship would sound like "This event is related to to the following other events". My first instinct is to create an EventEvent model, with a first_event_id field and a second_event_id field. Then I would define the following two relationships in the Event model: $this->hasMany('Event as FirstRelatedEvents', array('local' => 'first_event_id', 'foreign' => 'second_event_id', 'refClass' => 'EventEvent')); $this->hasMany('Event as SecondRelatedEvents', array('local' => 'second_event_id', 'foreign' => 'first_event_id', 'refClass' => 'EventEvent')); But I would rather not have to use two relationships on the Event model. Is there a better way to do this?

    Read the article

  • Entity Framework (4.0) how to exclude a related table.

    - by Kohan
    I have just updated to using EF 4.0 where before i was using Linq 2 SQL. I have a query: var UserList = this.repository.GetUsers(); return Json(UserList, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet); This was generating an error: "A circular reference was detected while serializing an object of type" This prompted this code which worked fine in L2S: var UserList = this.repository.GetUsers(); foreach (User u in UserList){ u.Subscriptions = null; } return Json(UserList, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet); How can i stop EF from looking into the Subscriptions table, i just want the Userlist, none of the related properties and the above example does not seem to work for this. Cheers, Kohan

    Read the article

  • Django GenericRelation doesn't save related object's id - is this a bug or am I doing it wrong?

    - by pinkeen
    I have a model with a generic relation (call it A), when creating an instance of this object I pass an instance of another model (call it B) as the initializer of the content_object field (via kwargs of the constructor). If I don't save B before creating A then when saving A the content_object_id is saved to the db as NULL. If I save B before passing it to the constructor of A then everything's allright. It's not logical. I assumed that the ID of the related object (B) is fetched when doing A.save() and it should throw some kind of an exception if B isn't saved yet but it just fails silently. I don't like the current solution (saving B beforhand) because we don't know yet if I will be always willing to keep the object, not just scrap it, and there are performance considerations - what if I will add some another data and save it once more shortly after. class BaseNodeData(models.Model): ... extnodedata_content_type = models.ForeignKey(ContentType, null=True) extnodedata_object_id = models.PositiveIntegerField(null=True) extnodedata = generic.GenericForeignKey(ct_field='extnodedata_content_type', fk_field='extnodedata_object_id') class MarkupNodeData(models.Model): raw_content = models.TextField() Suppose we do: markup = MarkupNodeData(raw_content='...') base = BaseNodeData(..., extnodedata=markup) markup.save() base.save() # both records are inserted to the DB but base is stored with extnodedata_object_id=NULL markup = MarkupNodeData(raw_content='...') base = BaseNodeData(..., extnodedata=markup) base.save() markup.save() # no exception is thrown and everything is the same as above markup = MarkupNodeData(raw_content='...') markup.save() base = BaseNodeData(..., extnodedata=markup) base.save() # this works as expected Of course I can do it this way, but it doesn't change anything: base = BaseNodeData(...) base.extnodedata = markup My question is - is this a bug in django which I should report or maybe I'm doing something wrong. Docs on GenericRelations aren't exactly verbose.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35  | Next Page >