Search Results

Search found 54190 results on 2168 pages for 'http authentication'.

Page 29/2168 | < Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36  | Next Page >

• Sharepoint web services -- The HTTP request is unauthorized with client authentication scheme 'Ntlm'

  - by Pandincus

  I know there's a lot of questions on SO similar to this, but I couldn't find one for this particular issue. A couple of points, first: I have no control over our Sharepoint server. I cannot tweak any IIS settings. I believe our IIS server version is IIS 7.0. Our Sharepoint Server is anticipating requests via NTLM. Our Sharepoint Server is on the same domain as my client computer. I am using .NET Framework 3.5, Visual Studio 2008 I am trying to write a simple console app to manipulate Sharepoint data using Sharepoint Web Services. I have added the Service Reference, and the following is my app.config: <system.serviceModel> <bindings> <basicHttpBinding> <binding name="ListsSoap" closeTimeout="00:01:00" openTimeout="00:01:00" receiveTimeout="00:10:00" sendTimeout="00:01:00" allowCookies="false" bypassProxyOnLocal="false" hostNameComparisonMode="StrongWildcard" maxBufferSize="65536" maxBufferPoolSize="524288" maxReceivedMessageSize="65536" messageEncoding="Text" textEncoding="utf-8" transferMode="Buffered" useDefaultWebProxy="true"> <readerQuotas maxDepth="32" maxStringContentLength="8192" maxArrayLength="16384" maxBytesPerRead="4096" maxNameTableCharCount="16384" /> <security mode="Transport"> <transport clientCredentialType="Ntlm" proxyCredentialType="Ntlm" /> </security> </binding> </basicHttpBinding> </bindings> <client> <endpoint address="https://subdomain.companysite.com/subsite/_vti_bin/Lists.asmx" binding="basicHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="ListsSoap" contract="ServiceReference1.ListsSoap" name="ListsSoap" /> </client> </system.serviceModel> This is my code: static void Main(string[] args) { using (var client = new ListsSoapClient()) { client.ClientCredentials.Windows.ClientCredential = new NetworkCredential("username", "password", "domain"); client.GetListCollection(); } } When I call GetListCollection(), the following MessageSecurityException gets thrown: The HTTP request is unauthorized with client authentication scheme 'Ntlm'. The authentication header received from the server was 'NTLM'. With an inner WebException: "The remote server returned an error: (401) Unauthorized." I've tried various bindings and various code tweaks to try to authenticate properly, but to no avail. I'll list those below. I've tried the following steps: Using a native Win32 Impersonator before creating the client using (new Impersonator.Impersonator("username", "password", "domain")) using (var client = new ListsSoapClient()) { client.ClientCredentials.Windows.ClientCredential = new NetworkCredential("dpincas", "password", "domain"); client.GetListCollection(); } This produced the same error message. Setting TokenImpersonationLevel for my client credentials using (var client = new ListsSoapClient()) { client.ClientCredentials.Windows.AllowedImpersonationLevel = TokenImpersonationLevel.Impersonation; client.GetListCollection(); } This produced the same error message. Using security mode=TransportCredentialOnly <security mode="TransportCredentialOnly"> <transport clientCredentialType="Ntlm" /> </security> This resulted in a different error message: The provided URI scheme 'https' is invalid; expected 'http'. Parameter name: via However, I need to use https, so I cannot change my URI scheme. I've tried some other combinations that I can't remember, but I'll post them when I do. I'm really at wits end here. I see a lot of links on Google that say "switch to Kerberos", but my server seems to only be accepting NTLM, not "Negotiate" (as it would say if it was looking for Kerberos), so that is unfortunately not an option. Any help out there, folks?

  Read the article

• Problem with Twitter basic authentication using AJAX

  - by jelford

  I'm developing a javascript App that needs, as part of its functionality, for users to be able to update their Twitter status. The App is designed to work on mobiles, and as such I don't really want to be sending users all the way over to the Twitter site to sign in; they should just be able to pass their credentials to the app, and I'll handle all the signin. So I'm trying to use the Basic Auth with the restful API. My code looks like: function postTweet(input){ $.ajax( { type: "POST", url: "http://twitter.com/statuses/update.json", data: {status: input}, dataType: "json", error: function() { alert("Some error occured"); }, success: function() { alert("Success!"); }, beforeSend: function(request) { request.setRequestHeader("Authorization", "Basic BASE64OFMYCREDENTIALS");} } ) ; } So, as far as I'm aware, this should perform the authentication from the XMLHttpRequest header, and then post the status. However, whenever I call this code, I get a "401 Unauthorized" error from Twitter. Below are the request & response headers from firebug: Request: OPTIONS /statuses/update.json HTTP/1.1 Host: twitter.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Language: en-gb,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 Keep-Alive: 115 Connection: keep-alive Origin: null Access-Control-Request-Method: POST Access-Control-Request-Headers: authorization Response: HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:08:58 GMT Server: hi Status: 401 Unauthorized WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="Twitter API" X-Runtime: 0.00204 Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Cache-Control: no-cache, max-age=300 Set-Cookie: guest_id=1268478538488; path=/ _twitter_sess=BAh7CDoPY3JlYXRlZF9hdGwrCPlyNlcnAToHaWQiJWUyN2YzYjc3OTk2NGQ3%250ANzJkYTA4MjYzOWJmYTQyYmUyIgpmbGFzaElDOidBY3Rpb25Db250cm9sbGVy%250AOjpGbGFzaDo6Rmxhc2hIYXNoewAGOgpAdXNlZHsA--d687808459872da0aa6a89cab35fd347300b4d07; domain=.twitter.com; path=/ Expires: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:13:58 GMT Vary: Accept-Encoding Content-Encoding: gzip Content-Length: 88 Connection: close Any help with this would be much appreciated, Thanks, jelford ps. I should mention I'm using JQuery, incase it's not clear.

  Read the article

• People Picker can't find Forms Authentication Users in WSS 3.0

  - by beyti

  I used a lot of tutorials to turn my windows authenticated default wss web app to use Forms Authentication. What I've done since; 1. created a web app. and a site in wss 3.0. Made its anonymous access enabled for all site content. This wss app is in the "wss3" server. 2. created a membership db with regsql.exe in .net framework folder.Created it with its default settings, like aspnetdb named database.This db is in the "sqlserver" server. 3. gave db.owner permission to the web app. admin of wss to the aspnetdb database. The user is registered under the same domain as the sql and the wss machines. 4. configured site's web.config file with following changes/adds: ..added the connectionString: <connectionStrings> <clear /> <add name="LocalSqlServer" connectionString="server=sqlserver;database=aspnetdb; Integrated Security=SSPI" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" /> </connectionStrings> ..added the membershipProvider: <membership> <providers> <add name="AspNetSqlMembershipProvider" type="System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider, System.Web, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" connectionStringName="LocalSqlServer" enablePasswordRetrieval="false" enablePasswordReset="true" requiresQuestionAndAnswer="true" applicationName="/" requiresUniqueEmail="false" passwordFormat="Hashed" maxInvalidPasswordAttempts="5" minRequiredPasswordLength="7" minRequiredNonalphanumericCharacters="1" passwordAttemptWindow="10" passwordStrengthRegularExpression="" /> </providers> </membership> ..also checked the peoplepicker settings: <PeoplePickerWildcards> <clear /> <add key="AspNetSqlMembershipProvider" value="%" /> </PeoplePickerWildcards> 5. After all, I changed the application provider of the site I created to use forms. Gave it the provider name of "AspNetSqlMembershipProvider". 6. I've created some users for Forms Authentication via ASP.net Configuration page by visual studio. 7. Checked the users in the db aspnetdb. They are there. 8. Tried to login to wss with one of them. Successfully logged in. With no privilages ofcourse. 9. Tried to give permission via Web Application Policy to that user which logged in. 10. People Picker couldn't find it at all. Any of the forms users couldn't be found. But it clearly tells that AD connection is also changed that none of the AD users couldn't be found either. It seems I'm missing something to configure about people picker. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Beytan

  Read the article

• Forms Authentication works on dev server but not production server (same SQL db)

  - by Desmond

  Hi, I have the same problem as a previously solved question however, this solution did not help me. I have posted the previous question and answer below: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2215963/forms-authentication-works-on-dev-server-but-not-production-server-same-sql-db/2963985#2963985 Question: I've never had this problem before, I'm at a total loss. I have a SQL Server 2008 database with ASP.NET Forms Authentication, profiles and roles created and is functional on the development workstation. I can login using the created users without problem. I back up the database on the development computer and restore it on the production server. I xcopy the DLLs and ASP.NET files to the server. I make the necessary changes in the web.config, changing the SQL connection strings to point to the production server database and upload it. I've made sure to generate a machine key and it is the same on both the development web.config and the production web.config. And yet, when I try to login on the production server, the same user that I'm able to login successfully with on the development computer, fails on the production server. There is other content in the database, the schema generated by FluentNHibernate. This content is able to be queried successfully on both development and production servers. This is mind boggling, I believe I've verified everything, but obviously it is still not working and I must have missed something. Please, any ideas? Answer: I ran into a problem with similar symptoms at one point by forgetting to set the applicationName attribute in the web.config under the membership providers element. Users are associated to a specific application. Since I didn't set the applicationName, it defaulted to the application path (something like "/MyApplication"). When it was moved to production, the path changed (for example to "/WebSiteFolder/SomeSubFolder /MyApplication"), so the application name defaulted to the new production path and an association could not be made to the original user accounts that were set up in development. Could your issues possibly be the same as mine? I have this already in my web.config but still get the issue. Any ideas? <membership> <providers> <clear/> <add name="AspNetSqlMembershipProvider" type="System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider, System.Web, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" connectionStringName="ApplicationServices" enablePasswordRetrieval="false" enablePasswordReset="true" requiresQuestionAndAnswer="false" requiresUniqueEmail="false" passwordFormat="Hashed" maxInvalidPasswordAttempts="5" minRequiredPasswordLength="6" minRequiredNonalphanumericCharacters="0" passwordAttemptWindow="10" passwordStrengthRegularExpression="" applicationName="/"/> </providers> </membership> <profile> <providers> <clear/> <add name="AspNetSqlProfileProvider" type="System.Web.Profile.SqlProfileProvider, System.Web, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" connectionStringName="ApplicationServices" applicationName="/"/> </providers> </profile> <roleManager enabled="false"> <providers> <clear/> <add connectionStringName="ApplicationServices" applicationName="/" name="AspNetSqlRoleProvider" type="System.Web.Security.SqlRoleProvider, System.Web, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a"/> <add applicationName="/" name="AspNetWindowsTokenRoleProvider" type="System.Web.Security.WindowsTokenRoleProvider, System.Web, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a"/> </providers> </roleManager> Any help is greatly appriciated.

  Read the article

• CURL Authentication being lost?

  - by John Sloan

  I am authenticating a login via CURL just fine. I have a variable I am using to display the returned HTML, and it is returning my user control panel as if I am logged in. After authenticating, I want to communicate variables with a form on another page within the site; but for some reason the HTML from that page is returning a non-authenticated version of the header (as if the original authentication never took place.) I have a cookies.txt file with 777 permissions, and have tried just getting the contents of the same page shown when I authenticate and it is as if I am losing any associated session/cookie data somewhere along the way. Here is my curl.class file - <? class Curl { public $cookieJar = ""; // Make sure the cookies.txt file is read/write permissions public function __construct($cookieJarFile = 'cookies.txt') { $this->cookieJar = $cookieJarFile; } function setup() { $header = array(); $header[0] = "Accept: text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,"; $header[0] .= "text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,*/*;q=0.5"; $header[] = "Cache-Control: max-age=0"; $header[] = "Connection: keep-alive"; $header[] = "Keep-Alive: 300"; $header[] = "Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7"; $header[] = "Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5"; $header[] = "Pragma: "; // browsers keep this blank. curl_setopt($this->curl, CURLOPT_USERAGENT, 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7'); curl_setopt($this->curl, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, $header); curl_setopt($this->curl, CURLOPT_COOKIEJAR, $this->cookieJar); curl_setopt($this->curl, CURLOPT_COOKIEFILE, $this->cookieJar); curl_setopt($this->curl, CURLOPT_AUTOREFERER, true); curl_setopt($this->curl, CURLOPT_COOKIESESSION, true); curl_setopt($this->curl, CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION, true); curl_setopt($this->curl, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, true); } function get($url) { $this->curl = curl_init($url); $this->setup(); return $this->request(); } function getAll($reg, $str) { preg_match_all($reg, $str, $matches); return $matches[1]; } function postForm($url, $fields, $referer = '') { $this->curl = curl_init($url); $this->setup(); curl_setopt($this->curl, CURLOPT_URL, $url); curl_setopt($this->curl, CURLOPT_POST, 1); curl_setopt($this->curl, CURLOPT_REFERER, $referer); curl_setopt($this->curl, CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS, $fields); return $this->request(); } function getInfo($info) { $info = ($info == 'lasturl') ? curl_getinfo($this->curl, CURLINFO_EFFECTIVE_URL) : curl_getinfo($this->curl, $info); return $info; } function request() { return curl_exec($this->curl); } } ?> And here is my curl.php file - <? include('curl.class.php'); // This path would change to where you store the file $curl = new Curl(); $url = "http://www.site.com/public/member/signin"; $fields = "MAX_FILE_SIZE=50000000&dado_form_3=1&member[email]=email&member[password]=pass&x=16&y=5&member[persistent]=true"; // Calling URL $referer = "http://www.site.com/public/member/signin"; $html = $curl->postForm($url, $fields, $referer); echo($html); ?> <hr style="clear:both;"/> <? $html = $curl->postForm('http://www.site.com/index.php','nid=443&sid=733005&tab=post&eval=yes&ad=&MAX_FILE_SIZE=10000000&ip=63.225.235.30','http://www.site.com/public/member/signin'); echo $html; // This will show you the HTML of the current page you and logged into ?> Any ideas?

  Read the article

• Restful authentication between two GAE apps.

  - by user259349

  Hello everyone, i am trying to write a restful google app engine application (python) that accepts requests only from another GAE that i wrote. I dont like any of the ways that i thought of to get this done, please advice if you know of something better than: Get SSL setup, and simply add the credentials on the request that my consuming app will send. I dont like it cause SSL will slow things down. Security by obsecurity. Add a random number in my request that is in Xmod0, where X is a secret number that both applications know. I just,,,, dont like this. Check the HTTP header to see where is the request coming from. This option is the one that i hate the least, not alot of processing, and spoofing an HTTP request is not really worth it, for my application's data. Is there any other clean solution for this?

  Read the article

• Restfull authentication between two GAE apps.

  - by user259349

  Hello everyone, i am trying to write a restful google app engine application (python) that accepts requests only from another GAE that i wrote. I dont like any of the ways that i thought of to get this done, please advice if you know of something better than: Get SSL setup, and simply add the credentials on the request that my consuming app will send. I dont like it cause SSL will slow things down. Security by obsecurity. Pass a long number by my consuming app that is in Xmod0, where X is a secret number that both applications know. I just,,,, dont like this. Check the HTTP header to see where is the request coming from. This option is the one that i hate the least, not alot of processing, and spoofing an HTTP request is not really worth it, for my application's data. Is there any other clean solution for this?

  Read the article

• Authenticating a user for a single app with multiple domains

  - by hofnarwillie

  I have one asp.net web application, but two different domains point to this web app. For instance: www.one.com and www.two.com both point to the same web app. I have an issue where I need certain pages to be on a specific domain (due to some security requirements from our online payment provider - a third party website). So let's say page1.aspx needs to be called on www.two.com The process is as follows: A user logs into www.one.com The authentication cookie is saved to the browser The user then navigates to page1.aspx and, if on the wrong domain, gets redirected to the correct domain. (this redirection happens on page1.aspx in the page_load event) Then asp.net redirects the user to the login screen, because the authentication cookie is not sent to www.two.com. How can I track the user and keep him/her logged in between the two domains?

  Read the article

• refresh a <ui:composition when j_security_check connection interrupted (http 408)

  - by José Osuna Barrios

  I have a "j_security_check connection interrupted (http code 408)" and proposed solution is <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="#{session.maxInactiveInterval}"/> by http://stackoverflow.com/a/2141274/1852036 but my page structure is a composition using a template.xhtml and a view.xhtml like a <ui:composition: my template.xhtml: <html ... <f:view ... <h:body ... <ui:insert name="content"> ... my view.xhtml to refresh when session.maxInactiveInterval <ui:composition ... <ui:define name="content"> ... may anyone help me to do this? I want to refresh this <ui:composition view, I can't use <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="#{session.maxInactiveInterval}"/> on template.xhtml because it's used by several views

  Read the article

• Is there a proven concept to website reverse certificate authentication?

  - by Tom

  We're looking at exposing some of our internal application data externally via a website. The actual details of the website aren't that interesting, it'll be built using ASP.NET/IIS etc, that might be relevant. With this, I'm essentially I'm looking for a mechanism to authenticate users viewing my website. This sounds trivial, a username/password is typically fine, but I want more. Now I've read plenty about SSL/x.509 to realise that the CA determines that we're alright, and that the user can trust us. But I want to trust the user, I want the user to be rejected if they don't have the correct credentials. I've seen a system for online banking whereby the bank issues a certificate which gets installed on the users' computer (it was actually smartcard based). If the website can't discover/utilise the key-pair then you are immediately rejected! This is brutal, but necessary. Is there a mechanism where I can do the following: Generate a certificate for a user Issue the certificate for them to install, it can be installed on 1 machine If their certificate is not accessible, they are denied all access A standard username/password scheme is then used after that SSL employed using their certificate once they're "in" This really must already exist, please point me in the right direction! Thanks for your help :)

  Read the article

• HTTP request, strange socket behavoir

  - by hoodoos

  I expirience strange behavior when doing HTTP requests through sockets, here the request: POST https://test.com:443/service/XMLSelect HTTP/1.1 Content-Length: 10926 Host: test.com User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 1.0.3705) Authorization: Basic XXX SOAPAction: http://test.com/SubmitXml Later on there goes body of my request with given content length. After that I recive something like: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1 Content-Type: text/xml;charset=utf-8 Transfer-Encoding: chunked Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:13:52 GMT So everything seem to be fine here. I read all contents from network stream and successfuly recieve response. But my socket which I'm doing polling on switches it's modes like that: write ( i write headers and request here ) read ( after headers sent i begin to recieve response ) write ( STRANGE BEHAVIOUR HERE. WHY? here i send nothing really ) read ( here it switches to read back again ) last two steps can repeat several times. So I want to ask what leads for socket's mode change? And in this case it's not a big problem, but when I use gzip compression in my request ( no idea how it's related ) and ask server to send gzipped response to me like this: POST https://test.com:443/service/XMLSelect HTTP/1.1 Content-Length: 1076 Accept-Encoding: gzip Content-Encoding: gzip Host: test.com User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 1.0.3705) Authorization: Basic XXX SOAPAction: http://test.com/SubmitXml I recieve response like that: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1 Content-Encoding: gzip Content-Type: text/xml;charset=utf-8 Transfer-Encoding: chunked Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:26:33 GMT 2000 ? I recieve a chunk size and GZIP header, it's all okay. And here's what is happening with my poor little socket meanwhile: write ( i write headers and request here ) read ( after headers sent i begin to recieve response ) write ( STRANGE BEHAVIOUR HERE. And it finally sits here forever waiting for me to send something! But if i refer to HTTP I don't have to send anything more! ) What can it be related to? What it wants me to send? Is it remote web server's problem or do I miss something? PS All actual service references and login/passwords replaced with fake ones :)

  Read the article

• How to maximize http.sys file upload performance

  - by anelson

  I'm building a tool that transfers very large streaming data sets (possibly on the order of terabytes in a single stream; routinely in the tens of gigabytes) from one server to another. The client portion of the tool will read blocks from the source disk, and send them over the network. The server side will read these blocks off the network and write them to a file on the server disk. Right now I'm trying to decide which transport to use. Options are raw TCP, and HTTP. I really, REALLY want to be able to use HTTP. The HttpListener (or WCF if I want to go that route) make it easy to plug in to the HTTP Server API (http.sys), and I can get things like authentication and SSL for free. The problem right now is performance. I wrote a simple test harness that sends 128K blocks of NULL bytes using the BeginWrite/EndWrite async I/O idiom, with async BeginRead/EndRead on the server side. I've modified this test harness so I can do this with either HTTP PUT operations via HttpWebRequest/HttpListener, or plain old socket writes using TcpClient/TcpListener. To rule out issues with network cards or network pathways, both the client and server are on one machine and communicate over localhost. On my 12-core Windows 2008 R2 test server, the TCP version of this test harness can push bytes at 450MB/s, with minimal CPU usage. On the same box, the HTTP version of the test harness runs between 130MB/s and 200MB/s depending upon how I tweak it. In both cases CPU usage is low, and the vast majority of what CPU usage there is is kernel time, so I'm pretty sure my usage of C# and the .NET runtime is not the bottleneck. The box has two 6-core Xeon X5650 processors, 24GB of single-ranked DDR3 RAM, and is used exclusively by me for my own performance testing. I already know about HTTP client tweaks like ServicePointManager.MaxServicePointIdleTime, ServicePointManager.DefaultConnectionLimit, ServicePointManager.Expect100Continue, and HttpWebRequest.AllowWriteStreamBuffering. Does anyone have any ideas for how I can get HTTP.sys performance beyond 200MB/s? Has anyone seen it perform this well on any environment?

  Read the article

• How to update facebook status by http request

  - by Narjes

  I try to send http request like: ..."POST http://api.facebook.com/restserver.php?method=facebook.users.setStatus&api_key=762ec91e7987aaeaee7e2cdfdfcb3c30&call_id=$call_id&sig=$s&v=1.0&uid=1533439618&status=44 HTTP/1.1";.... but I receive nothing... in twitter I success: .. "POST ht tp://twitter.com/statuses/update.xml?status=123123 HTTP/1.1" ...

  Read the article

• How to make from your Custom HTTP Module a stand alone HTTP server?

  - by Ole Jak

  How to make from your Custom HTTP Module a stand aloun TCP\HTTP server capable of for example runing near to any other HTTP server (on same port, just taking some URL namespace like www.example.com/myModule/blabla?id=anyID, and not beeng rood to my other servers like apache HTTP server with PHP (so I can steel call it www.example.com/myApach/blabla?id=anyID) and with my other C\C++ based servers.)? I need CODE examples...)

  Read the article

• C# http network requests with Windows service

  - by Omegavirus

  hello, today i wrote a windows service which needs to send regular http requests to a server. the problem is that the service runs under the "SYSTEM" account as local service and as such a type of service it isn't allowed to access the network.. for installing the service i use this class: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/152585/ServiceInstaller.cs is there a way to send http requests in a .net c# windows service and get the http response? thanks. :)

  Read the article

• Http.Request and cookies Python

  - by Kyle

  I am trying to retrieve source code from a webpage with an already issued cookie and write the source code to a txt file. If I remove the cookies=cookie portion I can retrieve the source code but I need to somehow send the cookie with the http.request. output = open('Filler.txt', 'w+') http = urllib3.PoolManager() cookie =('users' , '1597413515') r = http.request('http://google.com' , 'GET' , cookies=cookie) output.write(r.data) output.close() I get a KeyError: None

  Read the article

• SSL / HTTP / No Response to Curl

  - by Alex McHale

  I am trying to send commands to a SOAP service, and getting nothing in reply. The SOAP service is at a completely separate site from either server I am testing with. I have written a dummy script with the SOAP XML embedded. When I run it at my local site, on any of three machines -- OSX, Ubuntu, or CentOS 5.3 -- it completes successfully with a good response. I then sent the script to our public host at Slicehost, where I fail to get the response back from the SOAP service. It accepts the TCP socket and proceeds with the SSL handshake. I do not however receive any valid HTTP response. This is the case whether I use my script or curl on the command line. I have rewritten the script using SOAP4R, Net::HTTP and Curb. All of which work at my local site, none of which work at the Slicehost site. I have tried to assemble the CentOS box as closely to match my Slicehost server as possible. I rebuilt the Slice to be a stock CentOS 5.3 and stock CentOS 5.4 with the same results. When I look at a tcpdump of the bad sessions on Slicehost, I see my script or curl send the XML to the remote server, and nothing comes back. When I look at the tcpdump at my local site, I see the response just fine. I have entirely disabled iptables on the Slice. Does anyone have any ideas what could be causing these results? Please let me know what additional information I can furnish. Thank you! Below is a wire trace of a sample session. The IP that starts with 173 is my server while the IP that starts with 12 is the SOAP server's. No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 1 0.000000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP 36872 > https [SYN] Seq=0 Win=5840 Len=0 MSS=1460 TSV=137633469 TSER=0 WS=6 Frame 1 (74 bytes on wire, 74 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 0, Len: 0 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 2 0.040000 12.36.x.x 173.45.x.x TCP https > 36872 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=8760 Len=0 MSS=1460 Frame 2 (62 bytes on wire, 62 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1), Dst: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6) Internet Protocol, Src: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x), Dst: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: https (443), Dst Port: 36872 (36872), Seq: 0, Ack: 1, Len: 0 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 3 0.040000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP 36872 > https [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=5840 Len=0 Frame 3 (54 bytes on wire, 54 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 1, Ack: 1, Len: 0 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 4 0.050000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x SSLv2 Client Hello Frame 4 (156 bytes on wire, 156 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 1, Ack: 1, Len: 102 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 5 0.130000 12.36.x.x 173.45.x.x TCP [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Frame 5 (1434 bytes on wire, 1434 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1), Dst: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6) Internet Protocol, Src: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x), Dst: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: https (443), Dst Port: 36872 (36872), Seq: 1, Ack: 103, Len: 1380 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 6 0.130000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP 36872 > https [ACK] Seq=103 Ack=1381 Win=8280 Len=0 Frame 6 (54 bytes on wire, 54 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 103, Ack: 1381, Len: 0 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 7 0.130000 12.36.x.x 173.45.x.x TLSv1 Server Hello, Certificate, Server Hello Done Frame 7 (1280 bytes on wire, 1280 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1), Dst: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6) Internet Protocol, Src: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x), Dst: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: https (443), Dst Port: 36872 (36872), Seq: 1381, Ack: 103, Len: 1226 [Reassembled TCP Segments (2606 bytes): #5(1380), #7(1226)] Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 8 0.130000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP 36872 > https [ACK] Seq=103 Ack=2607 Win=11040 Len=0 Frame 8 (54 bytes on wire, 54 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 103, Ack: 2607, Len: 0 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 9 0.130000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TLSv1 Client Key Exchange, Change Cipher Spec, Encrypted Handshake Message Frame 9 (236 bytes on wire, 236 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 103, Ack: 2607, Len: 182 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 10 0.190000 12.36.x.x 173.45.x.x TLSv1 Change Cipher Spec, Encrypted Handshake Message Frame 10 (97 bytes on wire, 97 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1), Dst: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6) Internet Protocol, Src: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x), Dst: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: https (443), Dst Port: 36872 (36872), Seq: 2607, Ack: 285, Len: 43 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 11 0.190000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TLSv1 Application Data Frame 11 (347 bytes on wire, 347 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 285, Ack: 2650, Len: 293 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 12 0.190000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Frame 12 (1514 bytes on wire, 1514 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 578, Ack: 2650, Len: 1460 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 13 0.450000 12.36.x.x 173.45.x.x TCP https > 36872 [ACK] Seq=2650 Ack=578 Win=64958 Len=0 Frame 13 (54 bytes on wire, 54 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1), Dst: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6) Internet Protocol, Src: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x), Dst: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: https (443), Dst Port: 36872 (36872), Seq: 2650, Ack: 578, Len: 0 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 14 0.450000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Frame 14 (206 bytes on wire, 206 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 2038, Ack: 2650, Len: 152 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 15 0.510000 12.36.x.x 173.45.x.x TCP [TCP Dup ACK 13#1] https > 36872 [ACK] Seq=2650 Ack=578 Win=64958 Len=0 Frame 15 (54 bytes on wire, 54 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1), Dst: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6) Internet Protocol, Src: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x), Dst: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: https (443), Dst Port: 36872 (36872), Seq: 2650, Ack: 578, Len: 0 No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 16 0.850000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Frame 16 (1514 bytes on wire, 1514 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 578, Ack: 2650, Len: 1460 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 17 1.650000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Frame 17 (1514 bytes on wire, 1514 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 578, Ack: 2650, Len: 1460 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 18 3.250000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Frame 18 (1514 bytes on wire, 1514 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 578, Ack: 2650, Len: 1460 Secure Socket Layer No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 19 6.450000 173.45.x.x 12.36.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Frame 19 (1514 bytes on wire, 1514 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: 40:40:17:3a:f4:e6 (40:40:17:3a:f4:e6), Dst: Dell_fb:49:a1 (00:21:9b:fb:49:a1) Internet Protocol, Src: 173.45.x.x (173.45.x.x), Dst: 12.36.x.x (12.36.x.x) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 36872 (36872), Dst Port: https (443), Seq: 578, Ack: 2650, Len: 1460 Secure Socket Layer

  Read the article

• Stange stream of HTTP GET requests in apache logs, from amazon ec2 instances

  - by Alexandre Boeglin

  I just had a look at my apache logs, and I see a lot of very similar requests: GET / HTTP/1.1 User-Agent: curl/7.24.0 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.24.0 \ NSS/3.13.5.0 zlib/1.2.5 libidn/1.18 libssh2/1.2.2 Host: [my_domain].org Accept: */* there's a steady stream of those, about 2 or 3 per minute; they all request the same domain and resource (there are slight variations in user agent version numbers); they come form a lot of different IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, in blocs that belong to amazon ec2 (in Singapore, Japan, Ireland and the USA). I tried to look for an explanation online, or even just similar stories, but couldn't find any. Has anyone got a clue as to what this is? It doesn't look malicious per say, but it's just annoying me, and I couldn't find any more information about it. I first suspected it could be a bot checking if my server is still up, but: I don't remember subscribing to such a service; why would it need to check my site twice every minute; why doesn't it use a clearly identifying fqdn. Or, should I send this question to amazon, via their abuse contact? Thanks!

  Read the article

• what can be causes of http server crash?

  - by mithunmo

  Hello , I am using WAMP server on Windows XP. Apache 2.2.11 MySQL 5.1.36 (INNODB engine) PHP 5.3.0 I observe that my WAMP server crashes in the following scenarios IF I use a Low end PC ( low processor speed and low RAM) After making some changes to httpd.conf file .For eg changing the Allow from IP address . But here it crashes only once and then it starts to work fine. Random crashes CRASH LOG szAppName : httpd.exe szAppVer : 2.2.11.0 szModName : php5ts.dll szModVer : 5.3.0.0 offset : 0000c309 C:\DOCUME~1\blrcom\LOCALS~1\Temp\WERc677.dir00\httpd.exe.mdmp C:\DOCUME~1\blrcom\LOCALS~1\Temp\WERc677.dir00\appcompat.txt My questions Does high CPU utilization/LOW RAM can also cause the HTTP server to crash ? excessive file reading as in every 10 seconds ? unlimited script execution time . I have set the maximum execution time in php script to 0 as my script has to execute for sometimes 2-3 days. Is there any way to avoid this ? Access to Database ? Should we use lock before reading and writing Can these be the reasons for random wamp server crashes ? OR is is some other programming error ? Please guide me . Regards, Mithun

  Read the article

• Outbound HTTP performance tuning recommendations

  - by Richard Gadsden

  I'll detail my exact setup below, but general recommendations for a better web-browsing experience will be useful. A nice checklist of things to try would be great! I have 600 users on a single site with an 8MB leased line. I get a lot of moans about the performance of "the internet" (ie web-browsing). What recommendations do the community have for speeding things up without just throwing more bandwidth at it? I expect I will end up buying some more, but good management tips are always valuable. My setup is this: Cisco PIX (515E) firewall on the edge of the network. It's just doing some basic NAT, and opening up a handful of ports to various bastion hosts (aka DMZ servers). The DMZ is just a switch that the servers are plugged into. ISA 2006 Enterprise array (two servers) connecting DMZ to the internal LAN, with WebSense Web Security filtering HTTP traffic so users can't look at porn or waste bandwidth on YouTube during working hours. I've done a few things - I've just switched my internal DNS over to use root hints, which halved DNS query latency from 500ms to 250ms. Well worth doing. I'm trying to cache more aggressively, but so much more of the internet is AJAXy and doesn't cache very well as compared to five years ago. Plus the 70GB of cache which felt like a lot a few years ago really isn't any more. I'm getting about 45% cache hits by number of requests, but only about 22% by size, ie larger objects are less likely to be cached. Latency seems to be part of the problem. Is that attributable to the bandwidth problem, or are there things I can look at to try to reduce latency even on heavily-loaded bandwidth?

  Read the article

• HTTP Upload Problems

  - by jfoster

  We are running a marketplace on ColdFusion8 and IIS with a widely geographically distributed user base and have been receiving complaints of issues with some HTTP uploads. Most of the complaints are coming from geographically distant locations from our main datacenter on the US east coast. I've attempted to upload the same 70MB file from a US West coast test server to both our main site and a backup running the same code on a different network route and I saw the same issues fairly consistently in both places, so I've ruled out the code, route, and internal network errors. I've also tested uploads using both the native cf upload tag and a third party tool called SaFileUp. I saw the same issues with both upload tools, so I also don't think this is necessarily a ColdFusion problem. I don't have any problems uploading the test file from the East coast to other east coast servers, so I'm beginning to think that the distance between our users and our equipment is a factor. I've also found that smaller files are more likely to succeed than large ones (< 10MB) I tried the test upload with both IE and FF and did notice a difference in the way that the browsers seemed to handle packet errors. IE seemed to have a tough time continuing an upload after dropped / bad packets, whereas FF seemed to have the ability to gracefully resume an upload after experiencing packet problems. Has anyone experienced similar issues? Is there anything we can do on our side to make uploads more forgiving to packet loss or resumable after an error? A different upload tool etc… Do we need upload servers in more than one location to shorten the network routes between clients and servers? Does anyone think that switching uploads to SSL will help (no layer7 packet sniffing may lead to a smoother upload). Thanks.

  Read the article

• Forwarding HTTP Request with Direct Server Return

  - by Daniel Crabtree

  I have servers spread across several data centers, each storing different files. I want users to be able to access the files on all servers through a single domain and have the individual servers return the files directly to the users. The following shows a simple example: 1) The user's browser requests http://www.example.com/files/file1.zip 2) Request goes to server A, based on the DNS A record for example.com. 3) Server A analyzes the request and works out that /files/file1.zip is stored on server B. 4) Server A forwards the request to server B. 5) Server B returns file1.zip directly to the user without going through server A. Note: steps 4 and 5 must be transparent to the user and cannot involve sending a redirect to the user as that would violate the requirement of a single domain. From my research, what I want to achieve is called "Direct Server Return" and it is a common setup for load balancing. It is also sometimes called a half reverse proxy. For step 4, it sounds like I need to do MAC Address Translation and then pass the request back onto the network and for servers outside the network of server A tunneling will be required. For step 5, I simply need to configure server B, as per the real servers in a load balancing setup. Namely, server B should have server A's IP address on the loopback interface and it should not answer any ARP requests for that IP address. My problem is how to actually achieve step 4? I have found plenty of hardware and software that can do this for simple load balancing at layer 4, but these solutions fall short and cannot handle the kind of custom routing I require. It seems like I will need to roll my own solution. Ideally, I would like to do the routing / forwarding at the web server level, i.e. in PHP or C# / ASP.net. However, I am open to doing it at a lower level such as Apache or IIS, or at an even lower level, i.e. a custom proxy service in front of everything. Thanks.

  Read the article

• HTTP cache for my virtual machines

  - by MathematicalOrchid

  I have several Linux virtual machines running on my home PC. One of the quirks of Linux is that every time you run a package manager, it wants to "refresh" the configured software repositories - which basically means it wants to download a file from the Internet. If I revert to an earlier snapshot of the VM, then next time I run the package manager it will re-download the exact same data again [since it no longer exists in the VM]. It seems a shame to waste bandwidth endlessly downloading the same data over and over again, so I was wondering if there's some way I can set up some kind of HTTP proxy server that caches downloaded files. I have no idea how you would do such a thing though. In particular, it needs to be set up so that the VMs don't need to "know" that the cache is there; it needs to be transparent. But I don't know how to do that. Any suggestions on what software I'd need to use? It would be nice if I could run it under the Windows host OS, but running a small VM with a Linux guest is also possible...

  Read the article

• Is it bad to redirect http to https?

  - by jasondavis

  I just installed an SSL Certificate on my server. I use a web hosting panel called ZPanel that is an open source project. It then set up a redirect for all traffic on my domain on Port 80 to redirect it to Port 443. In other words, all my http://example.com traffic is now redirected to the appropriate https://example.com version of the page. The redirect is done in my Apache Virtual Hosts file with something like this... RewriteEngine on ReWriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} !^443$ RewriteRule ^/(.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [NC,R,L] My question is, are there any drawbacks to using SSL? Since this is not a 301 Redirect, will I lose link juice/ranking in search engines by switching to https? I appreciate the help. I have always wanted to set up SSL on a server, just for the practice of doing it, and I finally decided to do it tonight. It seems to be working well so far, but I am not sure if it's a good idea to use this on every page. My site is not eCommerce and doesn't handle sensitive data; it's mainly for looks and the thrill of installing it for learning. UPDATED ISSUE Strangely Bing creates this screenshot from my site now that it is using HTTPS everywhere...

  Read the article

• ASP.NET MVC 2 and authentication using WIF (Windows Identity Foundation)

  - by Russ Cam

  Are there any decent examples of the following available: Looking through the WIF SDK, there are examples of using WIF in conjunction with ASP.NET using the WSFederationAuthenticationModule (FAM) to redirect to an ASP.NET site thin skin on top of a Security Token Service (STS) that user uses to authenticate (via supplying a username and password). If I understand WIF and claims-based access correctly, I would like my application to provide its own login screen where users provide their username and password and let this delegate to an STS for authentication, sending the login details to an endpoint via a security standard (WS-*), and expecting a SAML token to be returned. Ideally, the SessionAuthenticationModule would work as per the examples using FAM in conjunction with SessionAuthenticationModule i.e. be responsible for reconstructing the IClaimsPrincipal from the session security chunked cookie and redirecting to my application login page when the security session expires. Is what I describe possible using FAM and SessionAuthenticationModule with appropriate web.config settings, or do I need to think about writing a HttpModule myself to handle this? Alternatively, is redirecting to a thin web site STS where users log in the de facto approach in a passive requestor scenario?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36  | Next Page >