Search Results

Search found 15914 results on 637 pages for 'physical security'.

Page 29/637 | < Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36  | Next Page >

• 6 steps to implement DUAL security on WCF using User name + SSL

  6 steps to implement DUAL security on WCF using User name + SSL

  Read the article

• Get the Latest Security Inside Out Newsletter, October Edition

  - by Troy Kitch

  The latest October edition of the Security Inside Out newsletter is now available and covers the following important security news: Securing Oracle Database 12c: A Technical Primer The new multitenant architecture of Oracle Database 12c calls for adopting an updated approach to database security. In response, Oracle security experts have written a new book that is expected to become a key resource for database administrators. Find out how to get a complimentary copy.  Read More HIPAA Omnibus Rule Is in Effect: Are You Ready? On September 23, 2013, the HIPAA Omnibus Rule went into full effect. To help Oracle’s healthcare customers ready their organizations for the new requirements, law firm Ballard Spahr LLP and the Oracle Security team hosted a webcast titled “Addressing the Final HIPAA Omnibus Rule and Securing Protected Health Information.” Find out three key changes affecting Oracle customers.  Read More The Internet of Things: A New Identity Management Paradigm By 2020, it’s predicted there will be 50 billion devices wirelessly connected to the internet, from consumer products to highly complex industrial and manufacturing equipment and processes. Find out the key challenges of protecting identity and data for the new paradigm called the Internet of Things.  Read More

  Read the article

• Security Advice for Managers

  - by TATWORTH

  Please go to the following for list of free downloads of security advice for managers.http://www.bis.gov.uk/policies/business-sectors/cyber-security/downloadsThere are case studies to explain to managers the effect of failure to maintain good security.At http://www.cpni.gov.uk/advice/cyber/Critical-controls/ there is a list of critical controls developed by GCHQ in conjunction with the SANS insitute.

  Read the article

• Free E-Book from APress - Building the Infrastructure for Cloud Security

  - by TATWORTH

  Originally posted on: http://geekswithblogs.net/TATWORTH/archive/2014/05/29/free-e-book-from-apress---building-the-infrastructure-for-cloud.aspxAt http://www.apress.com/9781430261452, APress are offering a free E-Book on Building the Infrastructure for Cloud Security. “This book provides a comprehensive look at the various facets of cloud security – infrastructure, network, services, Compliance and users.  It will provide real world case studies to articulate the real and perceived risks and challenges in deploying and managing services in a cloud infrastructure from a security perspective. ”

  Read the article

• The Unsustainable IT Data Center Security Budget

  Pop goes the IT security bubble, and along with that goes the CIO's blank check for data center security.

  Read the article

• Core Security Identifies Virtual PC Hole

  A company called Core Security Technologies says it's found a bug in Windows Virtual PC that could be a serious security risk.

  Read the article

• Get the MakeUseOf eBook Guide to Hacker Proofing Your PC

  - by ETC

  If you’re interested in checking out a solid overview of PC security best practices and tips, our friends over at MakeUseOf.com have released another free book in their computer-oriented eBook series. The fifty-page ebook HackerProof: Your Guide to PC Security covers a variety of topics including types of malware, operating systems and their inherent vulnerabilities, security best practices, tools for protecting your PC, the importance of security prep and backups, and recovering from malware attacks. It’s a nice and compact text, perfect for brushing up on security best practices for your own machine or sending to friends and relatives that could use a little after-school tutoring on keeping their computer secure and out of trouble. The best tip from the book? The overall message to be cautious and be preemptive in your security efforts is a great meta-tip to take away. Up-to-date definition files and a healthy sense of random links and emails attachments goes a long, long way towards staying safe. HackerProof: Your Guide to PC Security [Direct Link via MakeUseOf] Latest Features How-To Geek ETC How to Get Amazing Color from Photos in Photoshop, GIMP, and Paint.NET Learn To Adjust Contrast Like a Pro in Photoshop, GIMP, and Paint.NET Have You Ever Wondered How Your Operating System Got Its Name? Should You Delete Windows 7 Service Pack Backup Files to Save Space? What Can Super Mario Teach Us About Graphics Technology? Windows 7 Service Pack 1 is Released: But Should You Install It? Get the MakeUseOf eBook Guide to Hacker Proofing Your PC Sync Your Windows Computer with Your Ubuntu One Account [Desktop Client] Awesome 10 Meter Curved Touchscreen at the University of Groningen [Video] TV Antenna Helper Makes HDTV Antenna Calibration a Snap Turn a Green Laser into a Microscope Projector [Science] The Open Road Awaits [Wallpaper]

  Read the article

• Reuse security code between WCF and MVC.NET

  - by mrjoltcola

  First the background: I jumped into MVC.NET from the Java MVC world, so my implementation below is possibly cheating, I don't know. I avoided fooling with a custom membership provider and I just implemented the base code needed to authenticate and load roles in my LogOn action. Typically I just need to check roles programatically, and have no use for all of the other membership features, so I didn't originally think I needed a full Membership provider. I have a successful WCF project with a custom authentication and authorization layer that I did at least write per the proper API. I implemented it with custom IPrincipal, UserNamePasswordValidator and IAuthorizationPolicy classes to load from an Oracle database. In my WCF services, I use declarative security: [PrincipalPermission(SecurityAction.Demand, Role="ADMIN")]. The question (on the ASP.NET/MCV.NET side): All my reading indicates I should implement a custom Membership/Roles provider, and use [Authorize(Roles="ADMIN")] on my controller actions. At this point, I don't have a true Membership provider, but I'm using the same User class that implements the IPrincipal interface that works with the WCF security. I plan to share common code between the WCF and ASP.NET modules. So my LogOn action is not using the FormsService (and I assume this is bad). I had commented it out, and just used my "UserService" to access the Oracle db. Note my "TODO" comment below. public ActionResult LogOn(LogOnModel model, string returnUrl) { log.Info("Login attempt by " + model.UserName); if (ModelState.IsValid) { User user = userService.findByUserName(model.UserName); // Commented original MemberShipService code, this is probably bad // if (MembershipService.ValidateUser(model.UserName, model.Password)) if (user != null && user.Authenticate(model.Password) == true) { log.Info("Login success by " + model.UserName); FormsService.SignIn(model.UserName, model.RememberMe); // TODO: Override with Custom identity / roles? user.AddRoles(userService.listRolesByUser(user)); // pull in roles from db if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(returnUrl)) return Redirect(returnUrl); else return RedirectToAction("Index", "Home"); } else { log.Info("Login failure by " + model.UserName); ModelState.AddModelError("", "The user name or password provided is incorrect."); } } // If we got this far, something failed, redisplay form return View(model); } So can I make the above work? Can I stick the IPrincipal (User) into the CurrentContext or HttpContext? Can I integrate the custom IPrincipal I've already created without writing a full Membership/Roles Provider? I currently stick the User object into the session and access it from all MVC.NET controllers with "CurrentUser" property which grabs it from the session on demand. But this doesn't work with the [Authorize] attribute; I assume that is because it knows nothing about my custom Principal in the session, and is instead using whatever FormsService.SignIn() produces. I also found that session timeouts screw up the login redirect, the user doesn't get forwarded, instead we get a null exception accessing User from the session, and I assume it is related to my "skipping steps" to get a quick implementation. Thanks.

  Read the article

• 'sudo apt-get update' error

  - by psilo

  I've been having an issue with 'sudo apt-get update' for several days now. I've tried every proposed solution I could find but to no avail. Here is the output to 'apt-get update'. Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise InRelease Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates InRelease Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports InRelease Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security InRelease Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com precise InRelease Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://archive.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise Release Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com precise Release Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports Release Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security Release Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe TranslationIndex Err http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/dists/precise/Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/dists/precise/main/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/dists/precise/main/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/dists/precise/main/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

  Read the article

• Transfer used ram to swap and free more physical ram

  - by AbuOmar

  I have a vps with 256m physical ram and 512m swap space, I am trying to use a software that need more than 256m and less than 512m ram, so it uses swap. The problem is at some moment of the installation, the installation process checks the available physical ram, it's full (some swap is used), so it pauses the installation and tills that it must be some more ram to continue the installation.. I see that I need to move some of used physical ram to swap while the process is running.. Is there anyway I can do that? or any other solution! For sorry I am using openvz vps, and the vm.swappiness option can't be modified as a solution.

  Read the article

• Cloud Computing - Multiple Physical Computers, One Logical Computer

  - by Koobz

  I know that you can set up multiple virtual machines per physical computer. I'm wondering if it's possible to make multiple physical computers behave as one logical unit? Fundamentally the way I imagine it working is that you can throw 10 computers into a facility one day. You've got one client that requires the equivalent of two computers worth, and 100 others that eat up the remaining 8. As demands change you're just reallocating logical resources, maybe the 2 computer client now requires a third physical system. You just add it to the cloud, and don't worry about sharding the database, or migrating data over to a new server. Can it work this way? If yes, why would anyone ever do things like partition their database servers anymore? Just add more computing resources. You scale horizontally with the hardware, but your server appears to scale vertically. There's no need to modify your application's infrastructure to support multiple databases etc.

  Read the article

• Cloud Computing - Multiple Physical Computers, One Logical Computer

  - by bundini

  I know that you can set up multiple virtual machines per physical computer. I'm wondering if it's possible to make multiple physical computers behave as one logical unit? Fundamentally the way I imagine it working is that you can throw 10 computers into a facility one day. You've got one client that requires the equivalent of two computers worth, and 100 others that eat up the remaining 8. As demands change you're just reallocating logical resources, maybe the 2 computer client now requires a third physical system. You just add it to the cloud, and don't worry about sharding the database, or migrating data over to a new server. Can it work this way? If yes, why would anyone ever do things like hand partition their database servers anymore? Just add more computing resources. You scale horizontally with the hardware, but your server appears to scale vertically. There's no need to modify your application's supporting infrastructure to support multiple databases etc.

  Read the article

• Preparing a new physical system with VMWare

  - by Max

  I need to create a new installation of Windows, but at the same time I need this computer. So I decided to create a new physical disk from within VMWare, install windows/drivers/software and then just replace the HDD in the computer. I've bought a new HDD, split it into two partions and installed Windows 7 using the VMWare's ability to use phusical disks. I can see the windows files and directories that have been created on this partition, but when I'm replacing the HDD in the host machine it cannot boot from it. Why is that? Is it at all possible to create a bootable physical disk with VMWare or I should create a virtual disk and then use some HDD imaging tool to copy the HDD image to a physical disk? Maybe there's a better way of installing a new system and working on the computer at the same time?

  Read the article

• Logical and Physical network topologies

  - by t.thielemans

  I'm trying to understand the difference between logical and physical topologies but it's a bit confusing to me. Cisco states these as logical topologies, but from my understanding these should be physical topologies? This is what I understand so far: Physical PtP: desktop directly connected to a desktop Multiaccess: several desktops connected to a medium with access to each other (Cisco Ring image, how should I view this in a live situation?) Ring: several desktops directly connected to each other creating a loop? Logical PtP: two desktops (virtually) connected to each other with intermediairy devices in between MultiAccess: (don't have a clue) Ring: (don't have a clue) Could anyone help me out and perhaps explain the difference a bit more detailed? Online I can't find any useful topics. I am using the Cisco Network Fundamentals book.

  Read the article

• Which interface defines the physical address of a Dialup connection

  - by Debabratta

  I use dial up connection to connect to the Internet. When I type ipconfig/all in the command prompt it shows me a physical address along with description for the dial up connection. The description field shows WAN(PPP/SLIP)Interface. I want to know upon which this physical address depends? It depends on my computer or ISP. On changing my ISP, physical address for this dialup connection will change or remain same? Please give some idea.

  Read the article

• Facebook Connect - Security Warning

  - by Skoder

  Hey all, I'm using Facebook connect using FBML tags. Although it works, when I run the site in Internet Explorer, a security warning comes up similar to this: The current webpage is trying to open a site in your Trusted sites list. Do you want to allow this? Current site: http://www.facebook.com Trusted site: http://localhost" My Facebook code involves these two: http://static.ak.connect.facebook.com/js/api_lib/v0.4/FeatureLoader.js.php http://static.ak.connect.facebook.com/js/api_lib/v0.4/XdCommReceiver.js I tried changing them to HTTPS: https://ssl.connect... but the errors still appear. None of my pages use SSL. I've also tried turning facebook-logo='false' but still no luck. Any ideas on how to fix this? Although it's not show-stopping, it doesn't give a good impression to users who may be feel it insecure. Thanks

  Read the article

• Flash CS4 AS3 Security Sandbox Violation

  - by Jennifer Heidelberg

  Hi, I have build my entire website with flash and embedded several swf objects (slideshows) into it. everything always worked fine when I published it as swf movie. but now that I want to upload my website an error message occurs saying: Error #2044: Unhandled SecurityErrorEvent:. text=Error #2140: Security sandbox violation: file:///mylayout.swf cannot load file:///slideshow_1.swf. Local-with-filesystem and local-with-networking SWF files cannot load each other. I know that it has something to do with the fact that one of the swf is local with filesystem and the other local with networking. but in my publish settings i told it to access local files only. but it didnt help. does anyone have an answer?

  Read the article

• How to tell whether Code Access Security is allowed in library code

  - by Sander Rijken

  In .NET 4 Code Access Security (CAS) is deprecated. Whenever you call a method that implicitly uses it, it fails with a NotSupportedException, that can be resolved with a configuration switch that makes it fall back to the old behavior. We have a common library that's used in both .NET 3.5 and .NET 4, so we need to be able to tell whether or not we should use the CAS method. For example, in .NET 3.5 I should call: Assembly.Load(string, Evidence); Whereas in .NET 4 I want to call Assembly.Load(string); Calling Load(string, Evidence) throws a NotSupportedException. Of course this works, but I'd like to know if there's a better method: try { asm = Assembly.Load(someString, someEvidence); } catch(NotSupportedException) { asm = Assembly.Load(someString); }

  Read the article

• How to inherit from DataAnnotations.ValidationAttribute (it appears SecureCritical under Visual Stud

  - by codetuner

  Hi, I have an [AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers] class library containing subtypes of the System.DataAnnotations.ValidationAttribute. The library is used on contract types of WCF services. In .NET 2/3.5, this worked fine. Since .NET 4.0 however, running a client of the service in the Visual Studio debugger results in the exception "Inheritance security rules violated by type: '(my subtype of ValidationAttribute)'. Derived types must either match the security accessibility of the base type or be less accessible." (System.TypeLoadException) The error appears to occure only when all of the following conditions are met: a subclass of ValidationAttribute is in an AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers assembly reflection is used to check for the attribute the Visual Studio hosting process is enabled (checkbox on Project properties, Debug tab) So basically, in Visual Studio.NET 2010: create a new Console project, add a reference to "System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations" 4.0.0.0, write the following code: . using System; [assembly: System.Security.AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers()] namespace TestingVaidationAttributeSecurity { public class MyValidationAttribute : System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.ValidationAttribute { } [MyValidation] public class FooBar { } class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("ValidationAttribute IsCritical: {0}", typeof(System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.ValidationAttribute).IsSecurityCritical); FooBar fb = new FooBar(); fb.GetType().GetCustomAttributes(true); Console.WriteLine("Press enter to end."); Console.ReadLine(); } } } Press F5 and you get the exception ! Press Ctrl-F5 (start without debugging), and it all works fine without exception... The strange thing is that the ValidationAttribute will or will not be securitycritical depending on the way you run the program (F5 or Ctrl+F5). As illustrated by the Console.WriteLine in the above code. But then again, this appear to happen with other attributes (and types?) too. Now the questions... Why do I have this behaviour when inheriting from ValidationAttribute, but not when inheriting from System.Attribute ? (Using Reflector I don't find special settings on the ValidationAttribute class or it's assembly) And what can I do to solve this ? How can I keep MyValidationAttribute inheriting from ValidationAttribute in an AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers assembly without marking it SecurityCritical, still using the new .NET 4 level 2 security model and still have it work using the VS.NET debug host (or other hosts) ?? Thanks a lot! Rudi

  Read the article

• Spring-Security with X509?

  - by jschoen

  I am new to spring-security in general and am a bit confused. The project I am trying to integrate this with uses X509 certificates to identify users for signing in to the application. There are no usernames or passwords. We validate the certificates are good, and that they have been given access to our app. The question is how do I integrate spring in to this to get their roles using the X509 certificates? I have seen this: <http> ... <x509 subject-principal-regex="CN=(.*?)," user-service-ref="userService"/> ... </http> But I don't understand how this works. Will it still require something for a password? Or is the subject all it needs?

  Read the article

• Jersey, Spring, Tomcat and Security Annotations

  - by jr

  I need to secure a simple jersey RESTful API in a Tomcat 6.0.24 container. I'd like to keep the authentication with Basic Authentication using the tomcat-users.xml file to define the users and roles (this is for now, like I said its small). Now, for authorization I'd like to be able to use the JSR 250 annotations like @RolesAllowed, @PermitAll, @DenyAll, etc. I cannot for the life of me figure out how to wire this all up together. I really don't want to go spring-security route, since I need something very simple at the current time. Can someone point me in the right direction.

  Read the article

• Visual Studio / Visual Source Safe / Integrated Security / IIS 7

  - by Jason

  Using Visual Source Safe with IIS integration (the working dir is the IIS site) Visual Studio, pointed to the IIS site would load up the Web project. It would be under VSS control (have to check out files, etc). Recently, we had to switch to Integrated Security for our database connections from the web app. This means changing the impersonation of the IIS app pool (and anon authentication) to the impersonated account. Since I did this -- my project loads in Visual Studio, but it acts as if I'm not me, and the files aren't under source control anymore. I'm going to assume it's something with the pass-through from IIS to the VSS (as if you'll remember you had to add IIS_USERS to the VSS list of users). Even trying to add the impersonated account didn't work. Any ideas?

  Read the article

• Spring security custom principal bean

  - by wuntee

  I have a web application that is set up to use the default ldap server/authentication manager/authentication provider/user service. I have another DAO that already does majority of the work that those do (besides the authenticating a user) using Spring-LDAP. My problem is that I want the principal to be of my own custom bean class. What is the simplest way to do this? Initially I was thinking to create a custom authentication provider, but since the default one does exactly what I want, there doesnt seem to be a need. I am thinking I just need to override whatever object actually returns the Principal bean. Is this possible, and able to be injected into the security ldap authenticator context?

  Read the article

• How to tell wether Code Access Security is allowed in library code

  - by Sander Rijken

  in .NET 4 Code Access Security (CAS) is deprecated. Whenever you call a method that implicitly uses it, it fails with a NotSupportedException, that can be resolved with a configuration switch that makes it fall back to the old behavior. We have a common library that's used in both .NET 3.5 and .NET 4, so we need to be able to tell wether or not we should use the CAS method. For example, in .NET 3.5 I should call: Assembly.Load(string, Evidence); Whereas in .NET 4 I want to call Assembly.Load(string); Calling Load(string, Evidence) throws a NotSupportedException. Ofcourse this works, but I'd like to know if there's a better method: try { asm = Assembly.Load(someString, someEvidence); } catch(NotSupportedException) { asm = Assembly.Load(someString); }

  Read the article

• security issue of Linux sudo command?

  - by George2

  Hello everyone, 1. I am using Red Hat Enterprise 5 Linux box. I find if a user is in /etc/sudoers file, then if the user run command with sudo, the user will run this command with root privilege (without knowing root password, the user runs sudo only need to input the user's own password in order to run a command with sudo). Is that correct understanding? 2. If yes, then is it a security hole? Since users other than root could run with root privilege? thanks in advance, George

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36  | Next Page >