Search Results

Search found 9202 results on 369 pages for 'package structuring'.

Page 294/369 | < Previous Page | 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301  | Next Page >

• Build-Essentials installation failing

  - by Brickman

  I am having trouble accessing the several critical header files that show to be a part of the build process. The "Ubuntu Software Center" shows "Build Essentials" as installed: Next I did the following two commands, which did not improve the problem: ~$ sudo apt-get install build-essential [sudo] password for: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done build-essential is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. :~$ sudo apt-get install -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. :~$ Dump of headers after installation attempts. > /usr/include/boost/interprocess/detail/atomic.hpp > /usr/include/boost/interprocess/smart_ptr/detail/sp_counted_base_atomic.hpp > /usr/include/qt4/Qt/qatomic.h /usr/include/qt4/Qt/qbasicatomic.h > /usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qatomic.h > /usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qbasicatomic.h > /usr/share/doc/git-annex/html/bugs/git_annex_unlock_is_not_atomic.html > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/avr32/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/blackfin/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/cris/include/arch-v32/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/cris/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/frv/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/h8300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/ia64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/m32r/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/m68k/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/metag/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/microblaze/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/mn10300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/parisc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/score/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/sh/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/tile/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/arch/xtensa/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/include/asm-generic/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-15-generic/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/avr32/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/blackfin/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/cris/include/arch-v32/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/cris/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/frv/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/h8300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/ia64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/m32r/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/m68k/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/metag/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/microblaze/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/mn10300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/parisc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/score/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/sh/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/tile/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/arch/xtensa/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/include/asm-generic/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-17-generic/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/avr32/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/blackfin/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/cris/include/arch-v32/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/cris/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/frv/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/h8300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/ia64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/m32r/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/m68k/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/metag/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/microblaze/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/mn10300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/parisc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/score/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/sh/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/tile/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/arch/xtensa/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/include/asm-generic/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-18-generic/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/avr32/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/blackfin/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/cris/include/arch-v32/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/cris/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/frv/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/h8300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/ia64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/m32r/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/m68k/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/metag/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/microblaze/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/mn10300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/parisc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/score/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/sh/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/tile/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/arch/xtensa/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/include/asm-generic/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-19-generic/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/avr32/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/blackfin/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/cris/include/arch-v32/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/cris/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/frv/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/h8300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/ia64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/m32r/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/m68k/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/metag/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/microblaze/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/mn10300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/parisc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/score/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/sh/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/tile/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/arch/xtensa/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/include/asm-generic/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-20-generic/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/avr32/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/blackfin/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/cris/include/arch-v32/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/cris/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/frv/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/h8300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/ia64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/m32r/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/m68k/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/metag/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/microblaze/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/mn10300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/parisc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/score/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/sh/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/tile/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/arch/xtensa/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/include/asm-generic/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.11.0-22-generic/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/avr32/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/blackfin/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/cris/include/arch-v32/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/cris/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/frv/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/ia64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/m32r/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/m68k/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/metag/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/microblaze/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/mn10300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/parisc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/score/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/sh/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/tile/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/arch/xtensa/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/include/asm-generic/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404-generic/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.14.4-031404-lowlatency/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/avr32/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/blackfin/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/cris/include/arch-v32/arch/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/cris/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/frv/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/h8300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/ia64/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/m32r/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/m68k/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/metag/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/microblaze/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/mn10300/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/parisc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/score/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/sh/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/tile/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/arch/xtensa/include/asm/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/include/asm-generic/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/include/linux/atomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/ubuntu/lttng/lib/ringbuffer/vatomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/ubuntu/lttng/wrapper/ringbuffer/vatomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/ubuntu/lttng-modules/lib/ringbuffer/vatomic.h > /usr/src/linux-lts-saucy-3.11.0/ubuntu/lttng-modules/wrapper/ringbuffer/vatomic.h Yes, I know there are multiple headers of the same type here, but they are different versions. Version "linux-headers-3.14.4-031404" shows to be the latest. Ubuntu shows "Nothing needed to be installed." However, the following C/C++ headers files show to be missing for Eclipse and QT4. #include <linux/version.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/socket.h> #include <linux/miscdevice.h> #include <linux/list.h> #include <linux/vmalloc.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <asm/uaccess.h> #include <asm/atomic.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/usb.h> This problem appears on my 32-bit version of Ubuntu and on both of my 64-bit versions. What I am doing wrong?

  Read the article

• Red Gate Coder interviews: Alex Davies

  - by Michael Williamson

  Alex Davies has been a software engineer at Red Gate since graduating from university, and is currently busy working on .NET Demon. We talked about tackling parallel programming with his actors framework, a scientific approach to debugging, and how JavaScript is going to affect the programming languages we use in years to come. So, if we start at the start, how did you get started in programming? When I was seven or eight, I was given a BBC Micro for Christmas. I had asked for a Game Boy, but my dad thought it would be better to give me a proper computer. For a year or so, I only played games on it, but then I found the user guide for writing programs in it. I gradually started doing more stuff on it and found it fun. I liked creating. As I went into senior school I continued to write stuff on there, trying to write games that weren’t very good. I got a real computer when I was fourteen and found ways to write BASIC on it. Visual Basic to start with, and then something more interesting than that. How did you learn to program? Was there someone helping you out? Absolutely not! I learnt out of a book, or by experimenting. I remember the first time I found a loop, I was like “Oh my God! I don’t have to write out the same line over and over and over again any more. It’s amazing!” When did you think this might be something that you actually wanted to do as a career? For a long time, I thought it wasn’t something that you would do as a career, because it was too much fun to be a career. I thought I’d do chemistry at university and some kind of career based on chemical engineering. And then I went to a careers fair at school when I was seventeen or eighteen, and it just didn’t interest me whatsoever. I thought “I could be a programmer, and there’s loads of money there, and I’m good at it, and it’s fun”, but also that I shouldn’t spoil my hobby. Now I don’t really program in my spare time any more, which is a bit of a shame, but I program all the rest of the time, so I can live with it. Do you think you learnt much about programming at university? Yes, definitely! I went into university knowing how to make computers do anything I wanted them to do. However, I didn’t have the language to talk about algorithms, so the algorithms course in my first year was massively important. Learning other language paradigms like functional programming was really good for breadth of understanding. Functional programming influences normal programming through design rather than actually using it all the time. I draw inspiration from it to write imperative programs which I think is actually becoming really fashionable now, but I’ve been doing it for ages. I did it first! There were also some courses on really odd programming languages, a bit of Prolog, a little bit of C. Having a little bit of each of those is something that I would have never done on my own, so it was important. And then there are knowledge-based courses which are about not programming itself but things that have been programmed like TCP. Those are really important for examples for how to approach things. Did you do any internships while you were at university? Yeah, I spent both of my summers at the same company. I thought I could code well before I went there. Looking back at the crap that I produced, it was only surpassed in its crappiness by all of the other code already in that company. I’m so much better at writing nice code now than I used to be back then. Was there just not a culture of looking after your code? There was, they just didn’t hire people for their abilities in that area. They hired people for raw IQ. The first indicator of it going wrong was that they didn’t have any computer scientists, which is a bit odd in a programming company. But even beyond that they didn’t have people who learnt architecture from anyone else. Most of them had started straight out of university, so never really had experience or mentors to learn from. There wasn’t the experience to draw from to teach each other. In the second half of my second internship, I was being given tasks like looking at new technologies and teaching people stuff. Interns shouldn’t be teaching people how to do their jobs! All interns are going to have little nuggets of things that you don’t know about, but they shouldn’t consistently be the ones who know the most. It’s not a good environment to learn. I was going to ask how you found working with people who were more experienced than you… When I reached Red Gate, I found some people who were more experienced programmers than me, and that was difficult. I’ve been coding since I was tiny. At university there were people who were cleverer than me, but there weren’t very many who were more experienced programmers than me. During my internship, I didn’t find anyone who I classed as being a noticeably more experienced programmer than me. So, it was a shock to the system to have valid criticisms rather than just formatting criticisms. However, Red Gate’s not so big on the actual code review, at least it wasn’t when I started. We did an entire product release and then somebody looked over all of the UI of that product which I’d written and say what they didn’t like. By that point, it was way too late and I’d disagree with them. Do you think the lack of code reviews was a bad thing? I think if there’s going to be any oversight of new people, then it should be continuous rather than chunky. For me I don’t mind too much, I could go out and get oversight if I wanted it, and in those situations I felt comfortable without it. If I was managing the new person, then maybe I’d be keener on oversight and then the right way to do it is continuously and in very, very small chunks. Have you had any significant projects you’ve worked on outside of a job? When I was a teenager I wrote all sorts of stuff. I used to write games, I derived how to do isomorphic projections myself once. I didn’t know what the word was so I couldn’t Google for it, so I worked it out myself. It was horrifically complicated. But it sort of tailed off when I started at university, and is now basically zero. If I do side-projects now, they tend to be work-related side projects like my actors framework, NAct, which I started in a down tools week. Could you explain a little more about NAct? It is a little C# framework for writing parallel code more easily. Parallel programming is difficult when you need to write to shared data. Sometimes parallel programming is easy because you don’t need to write to shared data. When you do need to access shared data, you could just have your threads pile in and do their work, but then you would screw up the data because the threads would trample on each other’s toes. You could lock, but locks are really dangerous if you’re using more than one of them. You get interactions like deadlocks, and that’s just nasty. Actors instead allows you to say this piece of data belongs to this thread of execution, and nobody else can read it. If you want to read it, then ask that thread of execution for a piece of it by sending a message, and it will send the data back by a message. And that avoids deadlocks as long as you follow some obvious rules about not making your actors sit around waiting for other actors to do something. There are lots of ways to write actors, NAct allows you to do it as if it was method calls on other objects, which means you get all the strong type-safety that C# programmers like. Do you think that this is suitable for the majority of parallel programming, or do you think it’s only suitable for specific cases? It’s suitable for most difficult parallel programming. If you’ve just got a hundred web requests which are all independent of each other, then I wouldn’t bother because it’s easier to just spin them up in separate threads and they can proceed independently of each other. But where you’ve got difficult parallel programming, where you’ve got multiple threads accessing multiple bits of data in multiple ways at different times, then actors is at least as good as all other ways, and is, I reckon, easier to think about. When you’re using actors, you presumably still have to write your code in a different way from you would otherwise using single-threaded code. You can’t use actors with any methods that have return types, because you’re not allowed to call into another actor and wait for it. If you want to get a piece of data out of another actor, then you’ve got to use tasks so that you can use “async” and “await” to await asynchronously for it. But other than that, you can still stick things in classes so it’s not too different really. Rather than having thousands of objects with mutable state, you can use component-orientated design, where there are only a few mutable classes which each have a small number of instances. Then there can be thousands of immutable objects. If you tend to do that anyway, then actors isn’t much of a jump. If I’ve already built my system without any parallelism, how hard is it to add actors to exploit all eight cores on my desktop? Usually pretty easy. If you can identify even one boundary where things look like messages and you have components where some objects live on one side and these other objects live on the other side, then you can have a granddaddy object on one side be an actor and it will parallelise as it goes across that boundary. Not too difficult. If we do get 1000-core desktop PCs, do you think actors will scale up? It’s hard. There are always in the order of twenty to fifty actors in my whole program because I tend to write each component as actors, and I tend to have one instance of each component. So this won’t scale to a thousand cores. What you can do is write data structures out of actors. I use dictionaries all over the place, and if you need a dictionary that is going to be accessed concurrently, then you could build one of those out of actors in no time. You can use queuing to marshal requests between different slices of the dictionary which are living on different threads. So it’s like a distributed hash table but all of the chunks of it are on the same machine. That means that each of these thousand processors has cached one small piece of the dictionary. I reckon it wouldn’t be too big a leap to start doing proper parallelism. Do you think it helps if actors get baked into the language, similarly to Erlang? Erlang is excellent in that it has thread-local garbage collection. C# doesn’t, so there’s a limit to how well C# actors can possibly scale because there’s a single garbage collected heap shared between all of them. When you do a global garbage collection, you’ve got to stop all of the actors, which is seriously expensive, whereas in Erlang garbage collections happen per-actor, so they’re insanely cheap. However, Erlang deviated from all the sensible language design that people have used recently and has just come up with crazy stuff. You can definitely retrofit thread-local garbage collection to .NET, and then it’s quite well-suited to support actors, even if it’s not baked into the language. Speaking of language design, do you have a favourite programming language? I’ll choose a language which I’ve never written before. I like the idea of Scala. It sounds like C#, only with some of the niggles gone. I enjoy writing static types. It means you don’t have to writing tests so much. When you say it doesn’t have some of the niggles? C# doesn’t allow the use of a property as a method group. It doesn’t have Scala case classes, or sum types, where you can do a switch statement and the compiler checks that you’ve checked all the cases, which is really useful in functional-style programming. Pattern-matching, in other words. That’s actually the major niggle. C# is pretty good, and I’m quite happy with C#. And what about going even further with the type system to remove the need for tests to something like Haskell? Or is that a step too far? I’m quite a pragmatist, I don’t think I could deal with trying to write big systems in languages with too few other users, especially when learning how to structure things. I just don’t know anyone who can teach me, and the Internet won’t teach me. That’s the main reason I wouldn’t use it. If I turned up at a company that writes big systems in Haskell, I would have no objection to that, but I wouldn’t instigate it. What about things in C#? For instance, there’s contracts in C#, so you can try to statically verify a bit more about your code. Do you think that’s useful, or just not worthwhile? I’ve not really tried it. My hunch is that it needs to be built into the language and be quite mathematical for it to work in real life, and that doesn’t seem to have ended up true for C# contracts. I don’t think anyone who’s tried them thinks they’re any good. I might be wrong. On a slightly different note, how do you like to debug code? I think I’m quite an odd debugger. I use guesswork extremely rarely, especially if something seems quite difficult to debug. I’ve been bitten spending hours and hours on guesswork and not being scientific about debugging in the past, so now I’m scientific to a fault. What I want is to see the bug happening in the debugger, to step through the bug happening. To watch the program going from a valid state to an invalid state. When there’s a bug and I can’t work out why it’s happening, I try to find some piece of evidence which places the bug in one section of the code. From that experiment, I binary chop on the possible causes of the bug. I suppose that means binary chopping on places in the code, or binary chopping on a stage through a processing cycle. Basically, I’m very stupid about how I debug. I won’t make any guesses, I won’t use any intuition, I will only identify the experiment that’s going to binary chop most effectively and repeat rather than trying to guess anything. I suppose it’s quite top-down. Is most of the time then spent in the debugger? Absolutely, if at all possible I will never debug using print statements or logs. I don’t really hold much stock in outputting logs. If there’s any bug which can be reproduced locally, I’d rather do it in the debugger than outputting logs. And with SmartAssembly error reporting, there’s not a lot that can’t be either observed in an error report and just fixed, or reproduced locally. And in those other situations, maybe I’ll use logs. But I hate using logs. You stare at the log, trying to guess what’s going on, and that’s exactly what I don’t like doing. You have to just look at it and see does this look right or wrong. We’ve covered how you get to grip with bugs. How do you get to grips with an entire codebase? I watch it in the debugger. I find little bugs and then try to fix them, and mostly do it by watching them in the debugger and gradually getting an understanding of how the code works using my process of binary chopping. I have to do a lot of reading and watching code to choose where my slicing-in-half experiment is going to be. The last time I did it was SmartAssembly. The old code was a complete mess, but at least it did things top to bottom. There wasn’t too much of some of the big abstractions where flow of control goes all over the place, into a base class and back again. Code’s really hard to understand when that happens. So I like to choose a little bug and try to fix it, and choose a bigger bug and try to fix it. Definitely learn by doing. I want to always have an aim so that I get a little achievement after every few hours of debugging. Once I’ve learnt the codebase I might be able to fix all the bugs in an hour, but I’d rather be using them as an aim while I’m learning the codebase. If I was a maintainer of a codebase, what should I do to make it as easy as possible for you to understand? Keep distinct concepts in different places. And name your stuff so that it’s obvious which concepts live there. You shouldn’t have some variable that gets set miles up the top of somewhere, and then is read miles down to choose some later behaviour. I’m talking from a very much SmartAssembly point of view because the old SmartAssembly codebase had tons and tons of these things, where it would read some property of the code and then deal with it later. Just thousands of variables in scope. Loads of things to think about. If you can keep concepts separate, then it aids me in my process of fixing bugs one at a time, because each bug is going to more or less be understandable in the one place where it is. And what about tests? Do you think they help at all? I’ve never had the opportunity to learn a codebase which has had tests, I don’t know what it’s like! What about when you’re actually developing? How useful do you find tests in finding bugs or regressions? Finding regressions, absolutely. Running bits of code that would be quite hard to run otherwise, definitely. It doesn’t happen very often that a test finds a bug in the first place. I don’t really buy nebulous promises like tests being a good way to think about the spec of the code. My thinking goes something like “This code works at the moment, great, ship it! Ah, there’s a way that this code doesn’t work. Okay, write a test, demonstrate that it doesn’t work, fix it, use the test to demonstrate that it’s now fixed, and keep the test for future regressions.” The most valuable tests are for bugs that have actually happened at some point, because bugs that have actually happened at some point, despite the fact that you think you’ve fixed them, are way more likely to appear again than new bugs are. Does that mean that when you write your code the first time, there are no tests? Often. The chance of there being a bug in a new feature is relatively unaffected by whether I’ve written a test for that new feature because I’m not good enough at writing tests to think of bugs that I would have written into the code. So not writing regression tests for all of your code hasn’t affected you too badly? There are different kinds of features. Some of them just always work, and are just not flaky, they just continue working whatever you throw at them. Maybe because the type-checker is particularly effective around them. Writing tests for those features which just tend to always work is a waste of time. And because it’s a waste of time I’ll tend to wait until a feature has demonstrated its flakiness by having bugs in it before I start trying to test it. You can get a feel for whether it’s going to be flaky code as you’re writing it. I try to write it to make it not flaky, but there are some things that are just inherently flaky. And very occasionally, I’ll think “this is going to be flaky” as I’m writing, and then maybe do a test, but not most of the time. How do you think your programming style has changed over time? I’ve got clearer about what the right way of doing things is. I used to flip-flop a lot between different ideas. Five years ago I came up with some really good ideas and some really terrible ideas. All of them seemed great when I thought of them, but they were quite diverse ideas, whereas now I have a smaller set of reliable ideas that are actually good for structuring code. So my code is probably more similar to itself than it used to be back in the day, when I was trying stuff out. I’ve got more disciplined about encapsulation, I think. There are operational things like I use actors more now than I used to, and that forces me to use immutability more than I used to. The first code that I wrote in Red Gate was the memory profiler UI, and that was an actor, I just didn’t know the name of it at the time. I don’t really use object-orientation. By object-orientation, I mean having n objects of the same type which are mutable. I want a constant number of objects that are mutable, and they should be different types. I stick stuff in dictionaries and then have one thing that owns the dictionary and puts stuff in and out of it. That’s definitely a pattern that I’ve seen recently. I think maybe I’m doing functional programming. Possibly. It’s plausible. If you had to summarise the essence of programming in a pithy sentence, how would you do it? Programming is the form of art that, without losing any of the beauty of architecture or fine art, allows you to produce things that people love and you make money from. So you think it’s an art rather than a science? It’s a little bit of engineering, a smidgeon of maths, but it’s not science. Like architecture, programming is on that boundary between art and engineering. If you want to do it really nicely, it’s mostly art. You can get away with doing architecture and programming entirely by having a good engineering mind, but you’re not going to produce anything nice. You’re not going to have joy doing it if you’re an engineering mind. Architects who are just engineering minds are not going to enjoy their job. I suppose engineering is the foundation on which you build the art. Exactly. How do you think programming is going to change over the next ten years? There will be an unfortunate shift towards dynamically-typed languages, because of JavaScript. JavaScript has an unfair advantage. JavaScript’s unfair advantage will cause more people to be exposed to dynamically-typed languages, which means other dynamically-typed languages crop up and the best features go into dynamically-typed languages. Then people conflate the good features with the fact that it’s dynamically-typed, and more investment goes into dynamically-typed languages. They end up better, so people use them. What about the idea of compiling other languages, possibly statically-typed, to JavaScript? It’s a reasonable idea. I would like to do it, but I don’t think enough people in the world are going to do it to make it pick up. The hordes of beginners are the lifeblood of a language community. They are what makes there be good tools and what makes there be vibrant community websites. And any particular thing which is the same as JavaScript only with extra stuff added to it, although it might be technically great, is not going to have the hordes of beginners. JavaScript is always to be quickest and easiest way for a beginner to start programming in the browser. And dynamically-typed languages are great for beginners. Compilers are pretty scary and beginners don’t write big code. And having your errors come up in the same place, whether they’re statically checkable errors or not, is quite nice for a beginner. If someone asked me to teach them some programming, I’d teach them JavaScript. If dynamically-typed languages are great for beginners, when do you think the benefits of static typing start to kick in? The value of having a statically typed program is in the tools that rely on the static types to produce a smooth IDE experience rather than actually telling me my compile errors. And only once you’re experienced enough a programmer that having a really smooth IDE experience makes a blind bit of difference, does static typing make a blind bit of difference. So it’s not really about size of codebase. If I go and write up a tiny program, I’m still going to get value out of writing it in C# using ReSharper because I’m experienced with C# and ReSharper enough to be able to write code five times faster if I have that help. Any other visions of the future? Nobody’s going to use actors. Because everyone’s going to be running on single-core VMs connected over network-ready protocols like JSON over HTTP. So, parallelism within one operating system is going to die. But until then, you should use actors. More Red Gater Coder interviews

  Read the article

• Why should you choose Oracle WebLogic 12c instead of JBoss EAP 6?

  - by Ricardo Ferreira

  In this post, I will cover some technical differences between Oracle WebLogic 12c and JBoss EAP 6, which was released a couple days ago from Red Hat. This article claims to help you in the evaluation of key points that you should consider when choosing for an Java EE application server. In the following sections, I will present to you some important aspects that most customers ask us when they are seriously evaluating for an middleware infrastructure, specially if you are considering JBoss for some reason. I would suggest that you keep the following question in mind while you are reading the points: "Why should I choose JBoss instead of WebLogic?" 1) Multi Datacenter Deployment and Clustering - D/R ("Disaster & Recovery") architecture support is embedded on the WebLogic Server 12c product. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no direct D/R support included, Red Hat relies on third-part tools with higher prices. When you consider a middleware solution to host your business critical application, you should worry with every architectural aspect that are related with the solution. Fail-over support is one little aspect of a truly reliable solution. If you do not worry about D/R, your solution will not be reliable. Having said that, with Red Hat and JBoss EAP 6, you have this extra cost that will increase considerably the total cost of ownership of the solution. As we commonly hear from analysts, open-source are not so cheaper when you start seeing the big picture. - WebLogic Server 12c supports advanced LAN clustering, detection of death servers and have a common alert framework. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has limited LAN clustering support with no server death detection. They do not generate any alerts when servers goes down (only if you buy JBoss ON which is a separated technology, but until now does not support JBoss EAP 6) and manual intervention are required when servers goes down. In most cases, admin people must rely on "kill -9", "tail -f someFile.log" and "ps ax | grep java" commands to manage failures and clustering anomalies. - WebLogic Server 12c supports the concept of Node Manager, which is a separated process that runs on the physical | virtual servers that allows extend the administration of the cluster to WebLogic managed servers that are often distributed across multiple machines and geographic locations. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no equivalent technology. Whole server instances must be managed individually. - WebLogic Server 12c Node Manager supports Coherence to boost performance when managing servers. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no similar technology. There is no way to coordinate JBoss and infiniband instances provided by JBoss using high throughput and low latency protocols like InfiniBand. The Node Manager feature also allows another very important feature that JBoss EAP lacks: secure the administration. When using WebLogic Node Manager, all the administration tasks are sent to the managed servers in a secure tunel protected by a certificate, which means that the transport layer that separates the WebLogic administration console from the managed servers are secured by SSL. - WebLogic Server 12c are now integrated with OTD ("Oracle Traffic Director") which is a web server technology derived from the former Sun iPlanet Web Server. This software complements the web server support offered by OHS ("Oracle HTTP Server"). Using OTD, WebLogic instances are load-balanced by a high powerful software that knows how to handle SDP ("Socket Direct Protocol") over InfiniBand, which boost performance when used with engineered systems technologies like Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand only offers support to Apache Web Server with custom modules created to deal with JBoss clusters, but only across standard TCP/IP networks.  2) Application and Runtime Diagnostics - WebLogic Server 12c have diagnostics capabilities embedded on the server called WLDF ("WebLogic Diagnostic Framework") so there is no need to rely on third-part tools. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no diagnostics capabilities. Their only diagnostics tool is the log generated by the application server. Admin people are encouraged to analyse thousands of log lines to find out what is going on. - WebLogic Server 12c complement WLDF with JRockit MC ("Mission Control"), which provides to administrators and developers a complete insight about the JVM performance, behavior and possible bottlenecks. WebLogic Server 12c also have an classloader analysis tool embedded, and even a log analyzer tool that enables administrators and developers to view logs of multiple servers at the same time. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand relies on third-part tools to do something similar. Again, only log searching are offered to find out whats going on. - WebLogic Server 12c offers end-to-end traceability and monitoring available through Oracle EM ("Enterprise Manager"), including monitoring of business transactions that flows through web servers, ESBs, application servers and database servers, all of this with high deep JVM analysis and diagnostics. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand, even using JBoss ON ("Operations Network"), which is a separated technology, does not support those features. Red Hat relies on third-part tools to provide direct Oracle database traceability across JVMs. One of those tools are Oracle EM for non-Oracle middleware that manage JBoss, Tomcat, Websphere and IIS transparently. - WebLogic Server 12c with their JRockit support offers a tool called JRockit Flight Recorder, which can give developers a complete visibility of a certain period of application production monitoring with zero extra overhead. This automatic recording allows you to deep analyse threads latency, memory leaks, thread contention, resource utilization, stack overflow damages and GC ("Garbage Collection") cycles, to observe in real time stop-the-world phenomenons, generational, reference count and parallel collects and mutator threads analysis. JBoss EAP 6 don't even dream to support something similar, even because they don't have their own JVM. 3) Application Server Administration - WebLogic Server 12c offers a complete administration console complemented with scripting and macro-like recording capabilities. A single WebLogic console can managed up to hundreds of WebLogic servers belonging to the same domain. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has a limited console and provides a XML centric administration. JBoss, after ten years, started the development of a rudimentary centralized administration that still leave a lot of administration tasks aside, so admin people and developers must touch scripts and XML configuration files for most advanced and even simple administration tasks. This lead applications to error prone and risky deployments. Even using JBoss ON, JBoss EAP are not able to offer decent administration features for admin people which must be high skilled in JBoss internal architecture and its managing capabilities. - Oracle EM is available to manage multiple domains, databases, application servers, operating systems and virtualization, with a complete end-to-end visibility. JBoss ON does not provide management capabilities across the complete architecture, only basic monitoring. Even deployment must be done aside JBoss ON which does no integrate well with others softwares than JBoss. Until now, JBoss ON does not supports JBoss EAP 6, so even their minimal support for JBoss are not available for JBoss EAP 6 leaving customers uncovered and subject to high skilled JBoss admin people. - WebLogic Server 12c has the same administration model whatever is the topology selected by the customer. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand differentiates between two operational models: standalone-mode and domain-mode, that are not consistent with each other. Depending on the mode used, the administration skill is different. - WebLogic Server 12c has no point-of-failures processes, and it does not need to define any specialized server. Domain model in WebLogic is available for years (at least ten years or more) and is production proven. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand needs special processes to garantee JBoss integrity, the PC ("Process-Controller") and the HC ("Host-Controller"). Different from WebLogic, the domain model in JBoss is quite new (one year at tops) of maturity, and need to mature considerably until start doing things like WebLogic domain model does. - WebLogic Server 12c supports parallel deployment model which enables some artifacts being deployed at the same time. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand does not have any similar feature. Every deployment are done atomically in the containers. This means that if you have a huge EAR (an EAR of 120 MB of size for instance) and deploy onto JBoss EAP 6, this EAR will take some minutes in order to starting accept thread requests. The same EAR deployed onto WebLogic Server 12c will reduce the deployment time at least in 2X compared to JBoss. 4) Support and Upgrades - WebLogic Server 12c has patch management available. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no patch management available, each JBoss EAP instance should be patched manually. To achieve such feature, you need to buy a separated technology called JBoss ON ("Operations Network") that manage this type of stuff. But until now, JBoss ON does not support JBoss EAP 6 so, in practice, JBoss EAP 6 does not have this feature. - WebLogic Server 12c supports previuous WebLogic domains without any reconfiguration since its kernel is robust and mature since its creation in 1995. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has a proven lack of supportability between JBoss AS 4, 5, 6 and 7. Different kernels and messaging engines were implemented in JBoss stack in the last five years reveling their incapacity to create a well architected and proven middleware technology. - WebLogic Server 12c has patch prescription based on customer configuration. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no such capability. People need to create ticket supports and have their installations revised by Red Hat support guys to gain some patch prescription from them. - Oracle WebLogic Server independent of the version has 8 years of support of new patches and has lifetime release of existing patches beyond that. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand provides patches for a specific application server version up to 5 years after the release date. JBoss EAP 4 and previous versions had only 4 years. A good question that Red Hat will argue to answer is: "what happens when you find issues after year 5"?  5) RAC ("Real Application Clusters") Support - WebLogic Server 12c ships with a specific JDBC driver to leverage Oracle RAC clustering capabilities (Fast-Application-Notification, Transaction Affinity, Fast-Connection-Failover, etc). Oracle JDBC thin driver are also available. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand ships only the standard Oracle JDBC thin driver. Load balancing with Oracle RAC are not supported. Manual intervention in case of planned or unplanned RAC downtime are necessary. In JBoss EAP 6, situation does not reestablish automatically after downtime. - WebLogic Server 12c has a feature called Active GridLink for Oracle RAC which provides up to 3X performance on OLTP applications. This seamless integration between WebLogic and Oracle database enable more value added to critical business applications leveraging their investments in Oracle database technology and Oracle middleware. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no performance gains at all, even when admin people implement some kind of connection-pooling tuning. - WebLogic Server 12c also supports transaction and web session affinity to the Oracle RAC, which provides aditional gains of performance. This is particularly interesting if you are creating a reliable solution that are distributed not only in an LAN cluster, but into a different data center. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no such support. 6) Standards and Technology Support - WebLogic Server 12c is fully Java EE 6 compatible and production ready since december of 2011. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand became fully compatible with Java EE 6 only in the community version after three months, and production ready only in a few days considering that this article was written in June of 2012. Red Hat says that they are the masters of innovation and technology proliferation, but compared with Oracle and even other proprietary vendors like IBM, they historically speaking are lazy to deliver the most newest technologies and standards adherence. - Oracle is the steward of Java, driving innovation into the platform from commercial and open-source vendors. Red Hat on the other hand does not have its own JVM and relies on third-part JVMs to complete their application server offer. 95% of Red Hat customers are using Oracle HotSpot as JVM, which means that without Oracle involvement, their support are limited exclusively to the application server layer and we all know that most problems are happens in the JVM layer. - WebLogic Server 12c supports natively JDK 7, which empower developers to explore the maximum of the Java platform productivity when writing code. This feature differentiate WebLogic from others application servers (except GlassFish that are also managed by Oracle) because the usage of JDK 7 introduce such remarkable productivity features like the "try-with-resources" enhancement, catching multiple exceptions with one try block, Strings in the switch statements, JVM improvements in terms of JDBC, I/O, networking, security, concurrency and of course, the most important feature of Java 7: native support for multiple non-Java languages. More features regarding JDK 7 can be found here. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand does not support JDK 7 officially, they comment in their community version that "Java SE 7 can be used with JBoss 7" which does not gives you any guarantees of enterprise support for JDK 7. - Oracle WebLogic Server 12c supports integration with Spring framework allowing Spring applications to use WebLogic special transaction manager, exposing bean interfaces to WebLogic MBeans to take advantage of all WebLogic monitoring and administration advantages. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no special integration with Spring. In fact, Red Hat offers a suspicious package called "JBoss Web Platform" that in theory supports Spring, but in practice this package does not offers any special integration. It is just a facility for Red Hat customers to have support from both JBoss and Spring technology using the same customer support. 7) Lightweight Development - Oracle WebLogic Server 12c and Oracle GlassFish are completely integrated and can share applications without any modifications. Starting with the 12c version, WebLogic now understands natively GlassFish deployment descriptors and specific configurations in order to offer you a truly and reliable migration path from a community Java EE application server to a enterprise middleware product like WebLogic. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no support to natively reuse an existing (or still in development) application from JBoss AS community server. Users of JBoss suffer of critical issues during deployment time that includes: changing the libraries and dependencies of the application, patching the DTD or XSD deployment descriptors, refactoring of the application layers due classloading issues and anomalies, rebuilding of persistence, business and web layers due issues with "usage of the certified version of an certain dependency" or "frameworks that Red Hat potentially does not recommend" etc. If you have the culture or enterprise IT directive of developing Java EE applications using community middleware to in a certain future, transition to enterprise (supported by a vendor) middleware, Oracle WebLogic plus Oracle GlassFish offers you a more sustainable solution. - WebLogic Server 12c has a very light ZIP distribution (less than 165 MB). JBoss EAP 6 ZIP size is around 130 MB, together with JBoss ON you have more 100 MB resulting in a higher download footprint. This is particularly interesting if you plan to use automated setup of application server instances (for example, to rapidly setup a development or staging environment) using Maven or Hudson. - WebLogic Server 12c has a complete integration with Maven allowing developers to setup WebLogic domains with few commands. Tasks like downloading WebLogic, installation, domain creation, data sources deployment are completely integrated. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has a limited offer integration with those tools.  - WebLogic Server 12c has a startup mode called WLX that turns-off EJB, JMS and JCA containers leaving enabled only the web container with Java EE 6 web profile. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no such feature, you need to disable manually the containers that you do not want to use. - WebLogic Server 12c supports fastswap, which enables you to change classes without redeployment. This is particularly interesting if you are developing patches for the application that is already deployed and you do not want to redeploy the entire application. This is the same behavior that most application servers offers to JSP pages, but with WebLogic Server 12c, you have the same feature for Java classes in general. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no such support. Even JBoss EAP 5 does not support this until now. 8) JMS and Messaging - WebLogic Server 12c has a proven and high scalable JMS implementation since its initial release in 1995. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has a still immature technology called HornetQ, which was introduced in JBoss EAP 5 replacing everything that was implemented in the previous versions. Red Hat loves to introduce new technologies across JBoss versions, playing around with customers and their investments. And when they are asked about why they have changed the implementation and caused such a mess, their answer is always: "the previous implementation was inadequate and not aligned with the community strategy so we are creating a new a improved one". This Red Hat practice leads to uncomfortable investments that in a near future (sometimes less than a year) will be affected in someway. - WebLogic Server 12c has troubleshooting and monitoring features included on the WebLogic console and WLDF. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no direct monitoring on the console, activity is reflected only on the logs, no debug logs available in case of JMS issues. - WebLogic Server 12c has extremely good performance and scalability. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has a JMS storage mechanism relying on Oracle database or MySQL. This means that if an issue in production happens and Red Hat affirms that an performance issue is happening due to database problems, they will not support you on the performance issue. They will orient you to call Oracle instead. - WebLogic Server 12c supports messaging enterprise features like SAF ("Store and Forward"), Distributed Queues/Topics and Foreign JMS providers support that leverage JMS implementations without compromise developer code making things completely transparent. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand do not even dream to support such features. 9) Caching and Grid - Coherence, which is the leading and most mature data grid technology from Oracle, is available since early 2000 and was integrated with WebLogic in 2009. Coherence and WebLogic clusters can be both managed from WebLogic administrative console. Even Node Manager supports Coherence. JBoss on the other hand discontinued JBoss Cache, which was their caching implementation just like they did with the messaging implementation (JBossMQ) which was a issue for long term customers. JBoss EAP 6 ships InfiniSpan version 1.0 which is immature and lack a proven record of successful cases and reliability. - WebLogic Server 12c has a feature called ActiveCache which uses Coherence to, without any code changes, replicate HTTP sessions from both WebLogic and other application servers like JBoss, Tomcat, Websphere, GlassFish and even Microsoft IIS. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand does have such support and even when they do in the future, they probably will support only their own application server. - Coherence can be used to manage both L1 and L2 cache levels, providing support to Oracle TopLink and others JPA compliant implementations, even Hibernate. JBoss EAP 6 and Infinispan on the other hand supports only Hibernate. And most important of all: Infinispan does not have any successful case of L1 or L2 caching level support using Hibernate, which lead us to reflect about its viability. 10) Performance - WebLogic Server 12c is certified with Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud and can run unchanged applications at this engineered system. This approach can benefit customers from Exalogic optimization's of both kernel and JVM layers to boost performance in terms of 10X for web, OLTP, JMS and grid applications. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no investment on engineered systems: customers do not have the choice to deploy on a Java ultra fast system if their project becomes relevant and performance issues are detected. - WebLogic Server 12c maintains a performance gain across each new release: starting on WebLogic 5.1, the overall performance gain has been close to 4X, which close to a 20% gain release by release. JBoss on the other hand does not provide SPECJAppServer or SPECJEnterprise performance benchmarks. Their so called "performance gains" remains hidden in their customer environments, which lead us to think if it is true or not since we will never get access to those environments. - WebLogic Server 12c has industry performance benchmarks with submissions across platforms and configurations leading SPECJ. Oracle WebLogic leads SPECJAppServer performance in multiple categories, fitting all customer topologies like: dual-node, single-node, multi-node and multi-node with RAC. JBoss... again, does not provide any SPECJAppServer performance benchmarks. - WebLogic Server 12c has a feature called work manager which allows your application to embrace new performance levels based on critical resource utilization of the CPUs usage. Work managers prioritizes work and allocates threads based on an execution model that takes into account administrator-defined parameters and actual run-time performance and throughput. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand has no compared feature and probably they never will. Not supporting such feature like work managers, JBoss EAP 6 forces admin people and specially developers to uncover performance gains in a intrusive way, rewriting the code and doing performance refactorings. 11) Professional Services Support - WebLogic Server 12c and any other technology sold by Oracle give customers the possibility of hire OCS ("Oracle Consulting Services") to manage critical scenarios, deployment assistance of new applications, high skilled consultancy of architecture, best practices and people allocation together with customer teams. All OCS services are available without any restrictions, having the customer bought software from Oracle or just starting their implementation before any acquisition. JBoss EAP 6 or Red Hat to be more specifically, only offers professional services if you buy subscriptions from them. If you are developing a new critical application for your business and need the help of Red Hat for a serious issue or architecture decision, they will probably say: "OK... I can help you but after you buy subscriptions from me". Red Hat also does not allows their professional services consultants to manage environments that uses community based software. They will probably force you to first buy a subscription, download their "enterprise" version and them, optionally hire their consultants. - Oracle provides you our university to educate your team into our technologies, including of course specialized trainings of WebLogic application server. At any time and location, you can hire Oracle to train your team so you get trustful knowledge according to your specific needs. Certifications for the products are also available if your technical people desire to differentiate themselves as professionals. Red Hat on the other hand have a limited pool of resources to train your team in their technologies. Basically they are selling training and certification for RHEL ("Red Hat Enterprise Linux") but if you demand more specialized training in JBoss middleware, they will probably connect you to some "certified" partner localized training since they are apparently discontinuing their education center, at least here in Brazil. They were not able to reproduce their success with RHEL education to their middleware division since they need first sell the subscriptions to after gives you specialized training. And again, they only offer you specialized training based on their enterprise version (EAP in the case of JBoss) which means that the courses will be a quite outdated. There are reports of developers that took official training's from Red Hat at this year (2012) and in a certain JBoss advanced course, Red Hat supposedly covered JBossMQ as the messaging subsystem, and even the printed material provided was based on JBossMQ since the training was created for JBoss EAP 4.3. 12) Encouraging Transparency without Ulterior Motives - WebLogic Server 12c like any other software from Oracle can be downloaded any time from anywhere, you should only possess an OTN ("Oracle Technology Network") credential and you can download any enterprise software how many times you want. And is not some kind of "trial" version. It is the official binaries that will be running for ever in your data center. Oracle does not encourages the usage of "specific versions" of our software. The binaries you buy from Oracle are the same binaries anyone in the world could download and use for testing and personal education. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand are not available for download unless you buy a subscription and get access to the Red Hat enterprise repositories. If you need to test, learn or just start creating your application using Red Hat's middleware software, you should download it from the community website. You are not allowed to download the enterprise version that, according to Red Hat are more secure, reliable and robust. But no one of us want to start the development of a software with an unsecured, unreliable and not scalable middleware right? So what you do? You are "invited" by Red Hat to buy subscriptions from them to get access to the "cool" version of the software. - WebLogic Server 12c prices are publicly available in the Oracle website. If you want to know right now how much WebLogic will cost to your organization, just click here and get access to our price list. In the case of WebLogic, check out the "US Oracle Technology Commercial Price List". Oracle also encourages you to get in touch with a sales representative to discuss discounts that would make possible the investment into our technology. But you are not required to do this, only if you are interested in buying our technology or maybe you want to discuss some discount scenarios. JBoss EAP 6 on the other hand does not have its cost publicly available in Red Hat's website or in any other media, at least is not so easy to get such information. The only link you will possibly find in their website is a "Contact a Sales Representative" link. This is not a very good relationship between an customer and an vendor. This is not an example of transparency, mainly when the software are sold as open. In this situations, customers expects to see the software prices publicly available, so they can have the chance to decide, based on the existing features of the software, if the cost is fair or not. Conclusion Oracle WebLogic is the most mature, secure, reliable and scalable Java EE application server of the market, and have a proven record of success around the globe to prove it's majority. Don't lose the chance to discover today how WebLogic could fit your needs and sustain your global IT middleware strategy, no matter if your strategy are completely based on the Cloud or not.

  Read the article

• How to use QSerialDevice in Qt?

  - by Tobias

  Hello, I am trying to use QSerialDevice in Qt to get a connection to my serial port. I also tried QextSerialPort before (which works on Windows Vista but unfortunately not on Windows XP ..) but I need an API which supports XP, Vista and Win7... I build the library and configured it this way: CONFIG += dll CONFIG += debug I did use the current version from SVN (0.2.0 - 2010-04-05) and the 0.2.0 zip package. After building the library I did copy it to my Qt Libdir (C:\Qt\2009.05\qt\lib) and also to C:\Windows\system32. Now I try to link against the lib in my project file: LIBS += -lqserialdevice I import the needed header (abstractserial.h) and use my own AbstractSerial like this: // Initialize this->serialPort->setDeviceName("COM1"); if (!this->serialPort->open(QIODevice::ReadWrite | QIODevice::Unbuffered)) qWarning() << "Error" << this->serialPort->errorString(); // Configure SerialPort this->serialPort->setBaudRate(AbstractSerial::BaudRate4800); this->serialPort->setDataBits(AbstractSerial::DataBits8); this->serialPort->setFlowControl(AbstractSerial::FlowControlOff); this->serialPort->setParity(AbstractSerial::ParityNone); this->serialPort->setStopBits(AbstractSerial::StopBits1); The problem is, that if I run my application, it crashes immediately with exit code -1073741515 (application failed to initialize properly). This is the same error I got using QextSerialPort under Windows XP (it worked with Windows Vista). If I build the QSerialDevice lib with release config and also my program, it crashes immediately but with exit code -1073741819 Can someone help me with this program or with another solution of getting a serial port to work with Qt (maybe another API or something?) Otherwise I have to use Windows API functions which would mean that my program won't work with UNIX systems.. If you have a solution for the problem with QextSerialPort under WinXP SP3, they are also welcome ;) Best Regards, Tobias

  Read the article

• Should I worry about DDMS console log messages "Can't bind to local nnnn for debugger"?

  - by Chris

  I'm new to Android programming (and Eclipse IDE and Android emulator). I've got Hello World and some of Notepad working, but I'm still constantly getting quite a few DDMS console log messages (shown below) about not being able to bind locals for debugger. Is this a problem? Can I get rid of these messages somehow? [2010-05-29 21:03:16 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8601 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:05:26 - Device]Failed to delete temporary package: device (emulator-5556) request rejected: device not found [2010-05-29 21:06:47 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8600 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:07:05 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8601 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:07:05 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8602 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:07:06 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8604 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:07:07 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8609 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:07:17 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8610 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:07:20 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8613 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:08:20 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8616 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:08:20 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8618 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:08:20 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8620 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:08:20 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8627 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:08:21 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8632 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:08:23 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8636 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:08:23 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8640 for debugger [2010-05-29 21:08:23 - ddms]Can't bind to local 8643 for debugger

  Read the article

• Change font size in ListView - Android/Eclipse

  - by Soren

  How can I change the font size in a ListView element? In my main.xml file, I have tried several different values in for android:textSize (pt,px,sp,dp) and nothing seems to change it. Here is what I have currently for the in my main.xml: <ListView xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" android:id="@android:id/list" android:textColor="#ffffff" android:background="#000080" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:clickable="true" android:dividerHeight="1px" android:layout_marginTop="5px" android:textSize="8px"/> Here is my Java: package com.SorenWinslow.TriumphHistory; import android.app.ListActivity; import android.os.Bundle; import android.widget.ArrayAdapter; public class TriumphHistory extends ListActivity { String[] HistoryList; /** Called when the activity is first created. */ @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.main); ArrayAdapter<String> adapter; HistoryList = getResources().getStringArray(R.array.history); adapter = new ArrayAdapter<String> (this,android.R.layout.simple_list_item_1,HistoryList); setListAdapter(adapter); } }

  Read the article

• connecting mysql from android with jdbc

  - by manuraphy

  hai i used the following code to connect mysql in local host from android. it only displays the actions given in catch section . i dont know whether its a connection problem or not package com.test1; import java.sql.Connection; import java.sql.DriverManager; import java.sql.PreparedStatement; import java.sql.ResultSet; import android.app.Activity; import android.os.Bundle; import android.widget.TextView; public class Test1Activity extends Activity { /** Called when the activity is first created. */ String str="new"; static ResultSet rs; static PreparedStatement st; static Connection con; @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.main); final TextView tv=(TextView)findViewById(R.id.user); try { Class.forName("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"); con=DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:mysql://10.0.2.2:8080/example","root",""); st=con.prepareStatement("select * from country where id=1"); rs=st.executeQuery(); while(rs.next()) { str=rs.getString(2); } tv.setText(str); setContentView(tv); } catch(Exception e) { tv.setText(str); } } } when executes it displays "new" in the avd. java.lang.management.ManagementFactory.getThreadMXBean, referenced from method com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.appendDeadlockStatusInformation Could not find class 'javax.naming.StringRefAddr', referenced from method com.mysql.jdbc.ConnectionPropertiesImpl$ConnectionProperty.storeTo Could not find method javax.naming.Reference.get, referenced from method com.mysql.jdbc.ConnectionPropertiesImpl$ConnectionProperty.initializeFrom can anyone suggest some solution ? and thankz in advance

  Read the article

• MSDeploy doesn't deploy to remote server using MSBuild and Visual Studio 2010

  - by user317762

  I'm currently running Visual Studio Team System 2010 RC and I'm trying to get the Build Service setup to build my solution and deploy 3 web applications in it. I've created a custom build configuration called Integration and I've setup the "IIS Web site/application name to use on the destination server" on the Package/Publish tab of the Properties for each of the web applications. In my Build Definition I've set the following arguments: /p:DeployOnBuild=True /p:DeployTarget=MSDeployPublish /p:MSDeployPublishMethod=InProc /p:MsDeployServiceUrl=http://my-server-name:8172/msdeploy.axd /p:EnablePackageProcessLoggingAndAssert=True However, when I run the build I get the following error, for all three web applications: Updating setAcl (RightContent). C:\Program Files\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v10.0\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.targets(3481,5): error : Web deployment task failed. (Attempted to perform an unauthorized operation.) I don't think this is my actual problem though. This error is occuring after the following entry in the log: Updating setAcl This is what's causing the error message, but it appears that MSDeploy is trying to deploy to the local IIS on the Build server, not the server I specified with the MsDeployServiceUrl parameter. After looking at the targets file at C:\Program Files\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v10.0\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.targets, I added the EnablePackageProcessLoggingAndAssert, which adds extra logging. The log shows an emptry string for the value of MsDeployServiceUrl. I also noticed in the target that MsDeployServiceUrl has a lowercase s, which is somewhat confusing because the task name MSDeployPublish has an uppercase S. I tried using it using uppercase, then again using lowercase, but neither worked. A couple other things to note: My build service is running as NETWORK SERVICE. The server I'm trying to deploy to is on another domain. I also tried adding /p:username=mydomain\myusername /p:password=mypassword to the MSBuild paramter list, but that didn't help. Does anyone know if I'm supplying the correct parameters? Or provide me with the correct ones? Thanks

  Read the article

• c# WinForms ReportViewer Performance issue using RefreshReport() and ServerReport.SetParameters()

  - by mdk

  Hi All, Currently I am writing a c# client application that uses the WinForms ReportViewer Control to display reports from a remote server. I am having performance troubles with the ReportViewer Control, to be specific with the 2 methods reportViewer.ServerReport.SetParameters() and reportViewer.RefreshReport() – they both take a really long time to complete and not just on the very first call, but on each subsequent call as well. SetParameters() takes 20 to 40 seconds (they vary greatly in time, some execute event okay fast) and RefreshReport() is a bit faster but still takes ages. I don’t think the server is the culprit, as the same report viewed using the browser renders pretty fast, about a second tops. The report in question doesn't matter as well. When I break into the process and take a look at the call stack, I see a call to Socket.DoConnect. So I thought that’s a good reason to start using fiddler and I installed it, disabled caching and fired up the app again to see which call takes that long to connect, but the performance issue was gone. By using a proxy I am having the same performance as the webbrowser. FYI: I am using NTLM authentication in the following way: reportViewer.ServerReport.ReportServerCredentials.NetworkCredentials = new NetworkCredentials() { Username = ... } I don’t have a strong webbackground, so I guess my question is: What should this tell me / What should I be looking into? (Btw: Adding fiddler to my installation package is not the solution I am looking for :)) I am grateful for any pointers. Take care, -Martin

  Read the article

• Compress/Decompress NSString in objective-c (iphone) using GZIP or deflate

  - by Steven

  Hi, I have a web-service running on Windows Azure which returns JSON that I consume in my iPhone app. Unfortunately, Windows Azure doesn't seem to support the compression of dynamic responses yet (long story) so I decided to get around it by returning an uncompressed JSON package, which contains a compressed (using GZIP) string. e.g {"Error":null,"IsCompressed":true,"Success":true,"Value":"vWsAAB+LCAAAAAAAB..etc.."} ... where value is the compressed string of a complex object represented in JSON. This was really easy to implement on the server, but for the life of me I can't figure out how to decompress a gzipped NSString into an uncompressed NSString, all the examples I can find for zlib etc are dealing with files etc. Can anyone give me any clues on how to do this? (I'd also be happy for a solution that used deflate as I could change the server-side implementation to use deflate too). Thanks!! Steven Edit 1: Aaah, I see that ASIHTTPRequest is using the following function in it's source code: //uncompress gzipped data with zlib + (NSData *)uncompressZippedData:(NSData*)compressedData; ... and I'm aware that I can convert NSString to NSData, so I'll see if this leads me anywhere!

  Read the article

• log file is not getting created using JDK logging with Commons-logging

  - by Saida Dhanavath

  When I run the TestJcLLoggingService class log messages are coming to Console but no log file is created, please help me if you know the answer. two source files are pasted below. TestJcLLoggingService.java package com.amadeus.psp.pasd.logging; import org.apache.commons.logging.Log; import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory; import org.springframework.stereotype.Service; @Service public class TestJCLLoggingService { private static Log psp_log = LogFactory.getLog(TestJCLLoggingService.class); public static String testJCLLoggingServiceMethod(){ psp_log.info("start of method testJCLLoggingServiceMethod class TestJCLLoggingService"); psp_log.info("start of method testJCLLoggingServiceMethod class TestJCLLoggingService"); return "This is a test string for JCLLogging"; } public static void main(String[] args){ testJCLLoggingServiceMethod(); } } logging.properties handlers = java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler, java.util.logging.FileHandler .level = ALL com.amadeus.psp.pasd.level=ALL java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.level = ALL java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.formatter = java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter java.util.logging.FileHandler.pattern = %h/java%u.log java.util.logging.FileHandler.level=ALL java.util.logging.FileHandler.limit=50000 java.util.logging.FileHandler.count=1 java.util.logging.FileHandler.formatter=java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter java.util.logging.FileHandler.append=true Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• System.Net.WebClient doesn't work with Windows Authentication

  - by Peter Hahndorf

  I am trying to use System.Net.WebClient in a WinForms application to upload a file to an IIS6 server which has Windows Authentication as it only 'Authentication' method. WebClient myWebClient = new WebClient(); myWebClient.Credentials = new System.Net.NetworkCredential(@"boxname\peter", "mypassword"); byte[] responseArray = myWebClient.UploadFile("http://localhost/upload.aspx", fileName); I get a 'The remote server returned an error: (401) Unauthorized', actually it is a 401.2 Both client and IIS are on the same Windows Server 2003 Dev machine. When I try to open the page in Firefox and enter the same correct credentials as in the code, the page comes up. However when using IE8, I get the same 401.2 error. Tried Chrome and Opera and they both work. I have 'Enable Integrated Windows Authentication' enabled in the IE Internet options. The Security Event Log has a Failure Audit: Logon Failure: Reason: An error occurred during logon User Name: peter Domain: boxname Logon Type: 3 Logon Process: ÈùÄ Authentication Package: NTLM Workstation Name: boxname Status code: 0xC000006D Substatus code: 0x0 Caller User Name: - Caller Domain: - Caller Logon ID: - Caller Process ID: - Transited Services: - Source Network Address: 127.0.0.1 Source Port: 1476 I used Process Monitor and Fiddler to investigate but to no avail. Why would this work for 3rd party browsers but not with IE or System.Net.WebClient?

  Read the article

• Running PowerShell from MSdeploy runcommand does not exit

  - by Peter Moberg

  Im am trying to get MSDeploy to execute a PowerShell script on a remote server. This is how i execute MSDeploy: msdeploy \ -verb:sync \ -source:runCommand='C:\temp\HelloWorld.bat', \ waitInterval=15000,waitAttempts=1 \ -dest:auto,computername=$WebDeployService$Credentials -verbose HelloWorld.bat contains: echo "Hello world!" powershell.exe C:\temp\WebDeploy\Package\HelloWorld.ps1 echo "Done" The HelloWorld.ps1 only contains: Write-Host "Hello world from PowerShell!" However, it seems like PowerShell never terminates. This is the output from running the msdeploy: Verbose: Performing synchronization pass #1. Verbose: Source runCommand (C:\temp\HelloWorld.bat) does not match destination (C:\temp\HelloWorld.bat) differing in attributes (isSource['True','False']). Update pending. Info: Updating runCommand (C:\temp\HelloWorld.bat). Info: Info: C:\temp>echo "Hello world!" "Hello world!" C:\temp\WebDeploy>powershell.exe C:\temp\HelloWorld.ps1 Info: Hello world from Powershell! Info: Warning: The process 'C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe' (command line '/c "C:\Users\peter\AppData\Local\Temp\gaskgh55.b2q.bat "') is still running. Waiting for 15000 ms (attempt 1 of 1). Error: The process 'C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe' (command line '/c "C:\Users\peter\AppData\Local\Temp\gaskgh55.b2q.bat"' ) was terminated because it exceeded the wait time. Error count: 1. Anyone knows a solution?

  Read the article

• Java XML Unmarshalling fails on ampersand (&amp;) using JAXB

  - by ryanprayogo

  I have the following XML: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <details> ... <address1>Test&amp;Address</address1> ... </details> When I try to unmarshal it using JAXB, it throws the following exception: Caused by: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The reference to entity "Address" must end with the ';' delimiter. at org.apache.xerces.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.createSAXParseException(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.fatalError(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLScanner.reportFatalError(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanEntityReference(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDispatcher.dispatch(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XMLParser.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser.parse(Unknown Source) at com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.UnmarshallerImpl.unmarshal0(UnmarshallerImpl.java:194) But when I changed the &amp; in the XML to &apos;, it works. Looks like the problem is only with ampersand &amp; and I cannot understand why. The code to unmarshal is: JAXBContext context = JAXBContext.newInstance("some.package.name", this.getClass().getClassLoader()); Unmarshaller unmarshaller = context.createUnmarshaller(); obj = unmarshaller.unmarshal(new StringReader(xml)); Anyone have some insight?

  Read the article

• axis2 web service behave differently when tested with web service client or with local test class

  - by Stefano

  Hello I need to update a facade to some web service proxy classes to a third party web service, and expose them as a service. This for two reason : to maintain the same interface for all application that need to use the system : actually its migrating and there are a few differences in the third party ws (method names); and to expose a simplified interface. The third party has provided me with a manual and some pregenerated proxy classes to their service (the java file says generated with axis2 1,4) . I've used netbeans 6.8 and the axis2 plugin to create an axis2 service . This service contains the proxy classes and the facade class which instantiate the web service proxy and calls its method; the facade class is exposed as service. I've used axis2 1.4 (at beginnig and later 1.5 ) and tomcat 6.0. The first test i did was to call the facede methods from inside the project itself and it worked. Then i've created a new project with a jax-ws web service client to call my class deployed on axis2. At this point has happened two strange thing : In the axis2 services page has appeared the third party proxy class as if it were a new service (if i try to get the wsdl axis raises an error ). eg. the proxy interface is named WebServiceAPI (_stub is the concrete class) and , after the first call to my service , i find a new "WebServicesAPI1272968932531_1" service inside axis . The call obvoiusly fail i've began to sniff soap messages with wireshark and i've found they differs when using proxy classes direclty from my facade test class by the messages created after being deployed on axis. i've noticed they differs for the presence of the soap header in the failing message. any help would be greatly appreciated : maybe i messed up something, there might be some incompatibilities or version mistakes? below i've added the signature of the third party proxy, its impementation and the different soap messages: /* * WebServicesAPI.java * This file was auto-generated from WSDL * by the Apache Axis2 version: 1.4 Built on : Apr 26, 2008 (06:24:30 EDT) */ package com.ibm.eci.wsapi; public interface WebServicesAPI { public com.ibm.eci.wsapi.ArrayOfstring getWorkItemHistory( java.lang.String stateKey,java.lang.String logonID,com.ibm.eci.wsapi.RepoItemHandle workItemHandle) throws java.rmi.RemoteException,com.ibm.eci.wsapi.ExceptionException0; ...etc the concrete class is : /** * WebServicesAPIStub.java * * This file was auto-generated from WSDL * by the Apache Axis2 version: 1.4 Built on : Apr 26, 2008 (06:24:30 EDT) */ package com.ibm.eci.wsapi; /* * WebServicesAPIStub java implementation */ public class WebServicesAPIStub extends org.apache.axis2.client.Stub implements WebServicesAPI{ protected org.apache.axis2.description.AxisOperation[] _operations; ... public com.ibm.eci.wsapi.ArrayOfstring getWorkItemHistory( java.lang.String stateKey297,java.lang.String logonID298,com.ibm.eci.wsapi.RepoItemHandle workItemHandle299) throws java.rmi.RemoteException ,com.ibm.eci.wsapi.ExceptionException0{ org.apache.axis2.context.MessageContext _messageContext = null; try{ org.apache.axis2.client.OperationClient _operationClient = _serviceClient.createClient(_operations[0].getName()); _operationClient.getOptions().setAction("\"\""); _operationClient.getOptions().setExceptionToBeThrownOnSOAPFault(true); addPropertyToOperationClient(_operationClient,org.apache.axis2.description.WSDL2Constants.ATTR_WHTTP_QUERY_PARAMETER_SEPARATOR,"&"); // create a message context _messageContext = new org.apache.axis2.context.MessageContext(); // create SOAP envelope with that payload org.apache.axiom.soap.SOAPEnvelope env = null; com.ibm.eci.wsapi.GetWorkItemHistoryE dummyWrappedType = null; env = toEnvelope(getFactory(_operationClient.getOptions().getSoapVersionURI()), stateKey297, logonID298, workItemHandle299, dummyWrappedType, optimizeContent(new javax.xml.namespace.QName("http://wsapi.eci.ibm.com", "getWorkItemHistory"))); //adding SOAP soap_headers _serviceClient.addHeadersToEnvelope(env); // set the message context with that soap envelope _messageContext.setEnvelope(env); // add the message contxt to the operation client _operationClient.addMessageContext(_messageContext); //execute the operation client _operationClient.execute(true); org.apache.axis2.context.MessageContext _returnMessageContext = _operationClient.getMessageContext( org.apache.axis2.wsdl.WSDLConstants.MESSAGE_LABEL_IN_VALUE); org.apache.axiom.soap.SOAPEnvelope _returnEnv = _returnMessageContext.getEnvelope(); java.lang.Object object = fromOM( _returnEnv.getBody().getFirstElement() , com.ibm.eci.wsapi.GetWorkItemHistoryResponseE.class, getEnvelopeNamespaces(_returnEnv)); return getGetWorkItemHistoryResponse_return((com.ibm.eci.wsapi.GetWorkItemHistoryResponseE)object); ... the failing soap message (generated by jax-ws client to the axis deployed service) is : POST /vbr_wsapi/services/WebServicesAPI.Endpoint HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8 SOAPAction: "" User-Agent: Axis2 Host: n0611049:9083 Transfer-Encoding: chunked <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <soapenv:Header xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"> <wsa:To>http://n0611049:9083/vbr_wsapi/services/WebServicesAPI.Endpoint</wsa:To> <wsa:MessageID>urn:uuid:A31AD99897F9045E981272964443982</wsa:MessageID><wsa:Action>""</wsa:Action> </soapenv:Header> <soapenv:Body> <ns1:initializeProps xmlns:ns1="http://wsapi.eci.ibm.com"> <props><val>client.locale=it_IT</val> </props> </ns1:initializeProps> </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope> HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8 Content-Language: en-US Transfer-Encoding: chunked Connection: Close Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 09:16:15 GMT Server: WebSphere Application Server/7.0 <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <soapenv:Header xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"> <wsa:Action>http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/fault</wsa:Action> <wsa:RelatesTo>urn:uuid:A31AD99897F9045E981272964443982</wsa:RelatesTo> <wsa:FaultDetail> <wsa:ProblemAction> <wsa:Action>""</wsa:Action> </wsa:ProblemAction> </wsa:FaultDetail> </soapenv:Header> <soapenv:Body> <soapenv:Fault xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"> <faultcode>wsa:ActionNotSupported</faultcode> <faultstring>The [action] cannot be processed at the receiver.</faultstring> <detail /> </soapenv:Fault> </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope> the succesful call (generated by my local test class, not being deployed to axis yet) : POST /vbr_wsapi/services/WebServicesAPI.Endpoint HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8 SOAPAction: "" User-Agent: Axis2 Host: n0611049:9083 Transfer-Encoding: chunked <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <soapenv:Body> <ns1:initializeProps xmlns:ns1="http://wsapi.eci.ibm.com"> <props> <val>client.locale=it_IT</val> </props> </ns1:initializeProps> </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope> HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8 Content-Language: en-US Transfer-Encoding: chunked Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 09:40:03 GMT Server: WebSphere Application Server/7.0 <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <soapenv:Body> <dlwmin:initializePropsResponse xmlns:dlwmin="http://wsapi.eci.ibm.com"> <return>e0e40cc51ceb0adf96c582bb6e047b3d0f</return> </dlwmin:initializePropsResponse> </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope> POST /vbr_wsapi/services/WebServicesAPI.Endpoint HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8 SOAPAction: "" User-Agent: Axis2 Host: n0611049:9083 Transfer-Encoding: chunked <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <soapenv:Body> <ns1:logon xmlns:ns1="http://wsapi.eci.ibm.com"> <stateKey>e0e40cc51ceb0adf96c582bb6e047b3d0f</stateKey> <systemID>----</systemID> <authBundle> <password>-----</password> <sealed>false</sealed> <username>---</username> </authBundle> </ns1:logon> </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope> HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8 Content-Language: en-US Transfer-Encoding: chunked Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 09:40:21 GMT Server: WebSphere Application Server/7.0 <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <soapenv:Body> <dlwmin:logonResponse xmlns:dlwmin="http://wsapi.eci.ibm.com"> <return>e0e40cc51ceb0adf96c582bb6e047b3d10</return> </dlwmin:logonResponse> </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope> ... goes on with other calls

  Read the article

• How to change theme for AlertDialog.

  - by Min Soo Kim

  Hello everyone, I was wondering if someone could help me out. I am trying to create a custom AlertDialog. In order to do this, I added the following line of code in styles.xml @drawable/color_panel_background color_panel_background.9.png is located in drawable folder. This is also available in Android SDK res folder. The following is the main activity. package com.customdialog; import android.app.Activity; import android.app.AlertDialog; import android.app.Dialog; import android.content.DialogInterface; import android.os.Bundle; public class CustomDialog extends Activity { /** Called when the activity is first created. */ @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.main); this.setTheme(R.style.CustomAlertDialog); AlertDialog.Builder builder = new AlertDialog.Builder(this); builder.setMessage("HELLO!"); builder .setCancelable(false) .setPositiveButton("Yes", new DialogInterface.OnClickListener() { public void onClick(DialogInterface dialog, int id) { //MyActivity.this.finish(); } }) .setNegativeButton("No", new DialogInterface.OnClickListener() { public void onClick(DialogInterface dialog, int id) { //dialog.cancel(); } }); AlertDialog alertdialog = builder.create(); alertdialog.show(); } } In order to apply the theme to an AlertDialog, I had to set the theme to the current context. However, I just can't seem to get the app to show customized AlertDialog. Can anyone help me out with this, and thank you very much in advance!

  Read the article

• Using QTDesigner with PyQT and Python 2.6

  - by PyNewbie27

  Hi. I'm fairly new to Python and trying to work with the latest versions of QTDesigner, PyQT 4.7 and QT4.7 (I downloaded the whole package from PyQT4.7 website). I can't figure out how to make QTDesigner integrate closely with Python: ie. If I select "Form" View Code in QTDesigners menu, it errors saying "Unable to launch C:/Python26/Lib/site-packages/PyQT4/bin\uic." If I look in that directory there is a pyuic.py but not "uic". From searching online it seems this doesn't exist because it's expecting a C++ install instead of the python version. Is there anyway to make QTDesigner use/call pyuic.py to generate the code, then open an IDE or text editor of my choice to show me the PYTHON code generated by the QTDesigner-PyUIC chain? I'd like Designer to integrate closely with python, so I can make custom slots/signals in Designer while designing, then tweak the python code directly in my IDE later. If it is not possible to code directly inside QTDesigner using python, does that mean I have to hand code my programs entire UI directly in my PythonIDE? Using Designer directly would seemingly be nearly very very nice for a newbie such as myself, since I can see what properties each widget has and visually edit them while still learning the QT syntax without constantly having to use web resources to see what properties each widget should have and helps with boilerplate code generation, and what their defaults are, etc. I've googled and nobody seems to be using QTDesigner and Python in this manner together. It seems most are either handcoding all the QT code in their Python IDE of choice, or have found an obvious/easy method of doing what I want, therefore not really producing up to date tutorials on making this work together. Please enlighten me if you can. Thanks in advance for your time. Please include any suggestions you might have to a newbie trying to use Python with QT and QTDesigner. Thank you.

  Read the article

• How to build android cts? And how to add and run your test case?

  - by Leox

  From 2.0 the cts is freely downloadable from android's repository. But there is no documents about it. Does anyone can tell me: how to build cts? Is there a standard procedure? How to run cts? How to add customized test case? Here, share my experience. After repo sync all source, you can't directly run "make" to build all source. You will get some errors. Now, I'am trying to first build android source without cts, and then build cts alone. Also, here are some reference for run cts: http://i-miss-erin.blogspot.com/2010/05/how-to-add-test-plan-package-to-android.html www.mentby.com/chenny/how-does-cts-work-where-can-i-get-the-test-streams.html www.jxva.com/?act=blog!article&articleId=157 1st time Update @ 5-13 18:39 +8:00 I do the following steps: 1.build android source without cts (move cts out of the $SDK_ROOT). 2.build cts (move cts back). both jdk1.5 and 1.6 have the following errors: 1.The 1st time "make cts" report: "Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: ...(Too many open files)" 2.The 2nd time "make cts" report: "acp: file 'out/host/linux-x86/obj/EXECUTABLES/vm-tests_intermediates/tests/data' does not exist" 3.The 3rd time "make cts" report: "/bin/bash: line 0: cd: out/host/linux-x86/obj/EXECUTABLES/vm-tests_intermediates/hostjunit_files/classes: No such file or directory" 4.The last time "make cts" report: "zip error: Nothing to do! (try: zip -q -r ../../android.core.vm-tests.jar . -i .)"

  Read the article

• Using SSIS Web Service Task with WCF

  - by Omri

  Hello, I am using SQL Server 2008 SSIS for importing data to the DB and .Net 3.5 SP1 for Creating the WCF service. In the import task I am trying to use the Web Service Task to report to a WCF service. At first I encountered a problem with the WCF WSDL, the Web Service task couldn't get their code generated from the metadata exposed by the WCF service. So I found a blog post at Christian Weyer's Blog talking just about that. Now after I can successfully load a WCF service to the Web Service Task and get the functions generated just fine from the WSDL I encountered another problem. I get an error from the SSIS package at runtime saying that "Method 'ProxyNamespace.MyService.GetData' not found." The full Error is: Error: 0xC002F304 at Web Service Task False, Web Service Task: An error occurred with the following error message: "Microsoft.SqlServer.Dts.Tasks.WebServiceTask.WebserviceTaskException: Could not execute the Web method. The error is: Method 'ProxyNamespace.MyService.GetData' not found.. at Microsoft.SqlServer.Dts.Tasks.WebServiceTask.WebMethodInvokerProxy.InvokeMethod(DTSWebMethodInfo methodInfo, String serviceName, Object connection) at Microsoft.SqlServer.Dts.Tasks.WebServiceTask.WebServiceTaskUtil.Invoke(DTSWebMethodInfo methodInfo, String serviceName, Object connection, VariableDispenser taskVariableDispenser) at Microsoft.SqlServer.Dts.Tasks.WebServiceTask.WebServiceTask.executeThread()". I know that the simple solution is going back to regular Web Service, but I really don't want to go there. Thanks, Omri.

  Read the article

• Can somebody explain the differences, status and future of the various ASP.NET AJAX libraries and to

  - by tjrobinson

  I'm confused about the differences and relationships between the various Microsoft ASP.NET AJAX components/libraries/toolkits and particularly the naming of them. It starts off relatively simple with ASP.NET AJAX itself: ASP.NET AJAX 1.0 (available for ASP.NET 2.0 in a separate package called ASP.NET 1.0 Extensions) ASP.NET AJAX 3.5 (included with ASP.NET 3.5) ASP.NET AJAX 4.0 (included with ASP.NET 4.0) Then come the various projects on CodePlex and elsewhere: ASP.NET AJAX Control Toolkit (aka Original Ajax Control Toolkit) Samples CodePlex It seems that the September 2009 Release is the final release of the Original Ajax Control Toolkit and that it's been superseded by... Ajax Control Toolkit in ASP.NET Ajax Library It looks like the old ASP.NET AJAX Control Toolkit has now become part of a larger ASP.NET Ajax Library but is still maintained seperately on CodePlex. This release is in beta at time of writing so presumably if I want to use the "Control Toolkit" I should stick with the September 2009 Release of the Original ASP.NET AJAX Control Toolkit CodePlex Microsoft Ajax Library Preview Is this the same as the ASP.NET Ajax Library mentioned above just with a confusing name variation? Is the "Control Toolkit" included in Preview 6 and is it older newer or older than the code in Ajax Control Toolkit in ASP.NET Ajax Library? CodePlex Microsoft ASP.NET Ajax Wiki - note the inconsistent insertion of ASP.NET into the name Links to useful articles, roadmaps would be useful.

  Read the article

• WPF DataGrid window resize does not resize DataGridColumns

  - by skylap

  I have a WPF DataGrid (from the WPFToolkit package) like the following in my application. <Controls:DataGrid> <Controls:DataGrid.Columns> <Controls:DataGridTextColumn Width="1*" Binding="{Binding Path=Column1}" Header="Column 1" /> <Controls:DataGridTextColumn Width="1*" Binding="{Binding Path=Column2}" Header="Column 2" /> <Controls:DataGridTextColumn Width="1*" Binding="{Binding Path=Column3}" Header="Column 3" /> </Controls:DataGrid.Columns> </Controls:DataGrid> The column width should be automatically adjusted such that all three columns fill the width of the grid, so I set Width="1*" on every column. I encountered two problems with this approach. When the ItemsSource of the DataGrid is null or an empty List, the columns won't size to fit the width of the grid but have a fixed width of about 20 pixel. Please see the following picture: http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/3139/initialcolumnwidth.png When I maximize the application window, the columns won't adapt their size but keep their initial size. See the following picture: http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/9362/columnwidthaftermaximiz.png When I resize the application window with the mouse, the columns won't resize. I was able to solve problem #3 by deriving a sub class from DataGrid and override the DataGrid's OnRenderSizeChanged method as follows. protected override void OnRenderSizeChanged(SizeChangedInfo sizeInfo) { base.OnRenderSizeChanged(sizeInfo); foreach (var column in Columns) { var tmp = column.GetValue(DataGridColumn.WidthProperty); column.ClearValue(DataGridColumn.WidthProperty); column.SetValue(DataGridColumn.WidthProperty, tmp); } } Unfortunately this does not solve problems #1 and #2. How can I get rid of them?

  Read the article

• Start TabActivity from ListActivity (which is content of parent TabActivity) in Android

  - by barmaleikin

  Hi guys, I have problems with switching between activities. I have two TabActivities (A and B), each of of tab activity has 4 tabs with ListActivity. I am trying to show B activity onListItemClick. Code on click is: Intent intent = new Intent(getApplicationContext(), TabBActivity.class); startActivity(intent); My manifest file is following: <manifest xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" package="com" android:versionCode="1" android:versionName="1.0"> <application android:icon="@drawable/app_icon" android:label="@string/app_name" android:debuggable="true"> <activity android:name=".SplashScreen" android:label="@string/app_name"> <intent-filter> <action android:name="android.intent.action.MAIN" /> <category android:name="android.intent.category.LAUNCHER" /> </intent-filter> </activity> <activity android:name=".TabAActivity"> <intent-filter> <action android:name="com.TabAActivity" /> <category android:name="android.intent.category.LAUNCHER" /> </intent-filter> </activity> <activity android:name=".TabAListActivityA" android:label="AA"/> <activity android:name=".TabAListActivityB" android:label="AB"/> <activity android:name=".TabAListActivityC" android:label="AC"/> <activity android:name=".TabBActivity" android:label="B"/> <activity android:name=".TabAListBctivityA" android:label="BA"/> <activity android:name=".TabAListBctivityB" android:label="BB"/> <activity android:name=".TabAListBctivityC" android:label="BC"/> </application> </manifest> Is my manifest correct or maybe something is wrong with code? I would appreciate any help on this topic.

  Read the article

• Android: HTTPClient

  - by primal

  Hi, I was trying http-cleint tutorials from svn.apache.org. While running the application I am getting the following error in console. [2010-04-30 09:26:36 - HalloAndroid] ActivityManager: java.lang.SecurityException: Permission Denial: starting Intent { act=android.intent.action.MAIN cat=[android.intent.category.LAUNCHER] flg=0x10000000 cmp=com.org.example/.HalloAndroid } from null (pid=-1, uid=-1) requires android.permission.INTERNET I have added android.permission.INTERNET in AndroidManifest.xml. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <manifest xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" package="com.org.example" android:versionCode="1" android:versionName="1.0"> <application android:icon="@drawable/icon" android:label="@string/app_name"> <activity android:name=".HalloAndroid" android:label="@string/app_name" android:permission="android.permission.INTERNET"> <intent-filter> <action android:name="android.intent.action.MAIN" /> <category android:name="android.intent.category.LAUNCHER" /> </intent-filter> </activity> </application> <uses-permission android:name="android.permission.INTERNET"></uses-permission> </manifest> The java code in HalloAndroid.java is as follows HttpClient httpclient = new DefaultHttpClient(); HttpGet httpget2 = new HttpGet("http://google.com/"); HttpResponse response2 = null; try { response2 = httpclient.execute(httpget2); } catch (ClientProtocolException e1) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e1.printStackTrace(); } catch (IOException e1) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e1.printStackTrace(); } HttpEntity entity = response2.getEntity(); if (entity != null) { long len = entity.getContentLength(); if (len != -1 && len < 2048) { try { Log.d(TAG, EntityUtils.toString(entity)); } catch (ParseException e) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e.printStackTrace(); } catch (IOException e) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e.printStackTrace(); } } else { // Stream content out } Any help is much appreciated.

  Read the article

• WiX 3: Using heat.exe to add bulk files to a new WiX project: HEAT5150

  - by Karen Kwong

  If this is a repeat question, please direct me to the existing solution. I wasn't able to find a matching query. We currently use InstallShield. I'm attempting to covert a project with 407 files to a WiX3 installation package. I tried using heat.exe to do some of the automation but I get the following warning for almost every file: c: heat dir "c:\projectDir\projectA" -gg -ke -template:Product -out "c:\install\projectA\heatOutput" heat.exe: warning HEAT5150 : Could not harvest data from a file that was expected to be a SelfReg DLL: c:\projectDir\projectA\plugin1.dll. If this file does not support SelfReg you can ignore this warning. Otherwise, this error detail may be helpful to diagnose the failure: Unable to load file: c:\projectDir\projectA\plugin1.dll, error: 126. Q: Is it normal for this warning to be reported for every file? If there's a current "How To create/convert to your first WiX install project with many files" tutorial, please point me to it. The key requirement is "with many files". Thank-you -Karen Kwong- PS. I know that WiX is designed for incremental install project creation but it would be nice to know if there's an automated way to convert existing install projects.

  Read the article

• Actionscript 3: Force program to wait until event handler is called

  - by Jeremy Swinarton

  I have an AS 3.0 class that loads a JSON file in using a URLRequest. package { import flash.display.MovieClip; import flash.display.Loader; import flash.net.URLRequest; import flash.net.URLLoader; import flash.events.Event; public class Tiles extends MovieClip { private var mapWidth:int,mapHeight:int; private var mapFile:String; private var mapLoaded:Boolean=false; public function Tiles(m:String) { init(m); } private function init(m:String):void { // Initiates the map arrays for later use. mapFile=m; // Load the map file in. var loader:URLLoader = new URLLoader(); loader.addEventListener(Event.COMPLETE, mapHandler); loader.load(new URLRequest("maps/" + mapFile)); } private function mapHandler(e:Event):void { mapLoaded=true; mapWidth=3000; } public function getMapWidth():int { if (mapLoaded) { return (mapWidth); } else { getMapWidth(); return(-1); } } } } When the file is finished loading, the mapHandler event makes changes to the class properties, which in turn are accessed using the getMapWidth function. However, if the getMapwidth function gets called before it finishes loading, the program will fail. How can I make the class wait to accept function calls until after the file is loaded?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301  | Next Page >