Search Results

Search found 9478 results on 380 pages for 'rails routing'.

Page 3/380 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Rails routing issue

    - by Brob
    Hi I've just started learning rails and been going through some tutorials from learning rails (http://www.buildingwebapps.com/podcasts/79335-putting-the-page-contents-into-the) The tutorials appear to be Rails v2 and I'm on Rails v3 There is a line in the routes file which appears to be causing a problem map.view_page ':name', :controller => 'viewer', :action => 'show' The line works for the front end view i.e. my viewer controller but not for the back end I get the error NoMethodError in Viewer#show I think this has something to do with the view I am using and the line <%= @page.body %> I know it's difficult without the full code but if anyone can help that would be awesome

    Read the article

  • Error // Usage: rails new APP_PATH [options] // when running 'rails server'

    - by madphill
    Background info: I'm using GIT to get a repository of a project with Ruby files in it. The project lives in my SITES folder under home directory on my Mac. I have Ruby: 1.8.7 I have just upgraded Rails to: 3.0.3 All I am trying to accomplish is to be able to render localhost.com:3000 in my browser of the GIT project i've already downloaded so I can work on it locally. I ran the command 'rails server' and was returned the message below:: Usage: rails new APP_PATH [options] Options: [--skip-gemfile] # Don't create a Gemfile -m, [--template=TEMPLATE] # Path to an application template (can be a filesystem path or URL) -d, [--database=DATABASE] # Preconfigure for selected database (options: mysql/oracle/postgresql/sqlite3/frontbase/ibm_db) # Default: sqlite3 -O, [--skip-active-record] # Skip Active Record files -J, [--skip-prototype] # Skip Prototype files -T, [--skip-test-unit] # Skip Test::Unit files [--dev] # Setup the application with Gemfile pointing to your Rails checkout -r, [--ruby=PATH] # Path to the Ruby binary of your choice # Default: /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/bin/ruby -G, [--skip-git] # Skip Git ignores and keeps -b, [--builder=BUILDER] # Path to an application builder (can be a filesystem path or URL) [--edge] # Setup the application with Gemfile pointing to Rails repository Runtime options: -f, [--force] # Overwrite files that already exist -s, [--skip] # Skip files that already exist -p, [--pretend] # Run but do not make any changes -q, [--quiet] # Supress status output Rails options: -h, [--help] # Show this help message and quit -v, [--version] # Show Rails version number and quit Description: The 'rails new' command creates a new Rails application with a default directory structure and configuration at the path you specify. Example: rails new ~/Code/Ruby/weblog This generates a skeletal Rails installation in ~/Code/Ruby/weblog. See the README in the newly created application to get going.

    Read the article

  • Rails deployment questions

    - by Meltemi
    Getting ready to deploy a rails project on Mac OS X Server (10.5 - Leopard). Got a few questions for someone with Rails experience: where should directory containing the project go? inside the website's root folder or out? who should "own" that directory? www? root? something/someone else? hope to continue serving static pages via Apache... would like rails app to be served by mydomain/xxx/railsapp. is there a standard name people us for 'xxx'? not expecting too much traffic to begin with...just like to keep things as simple as possible.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC Routing - Redirect to aspx?

    - by bmoeskau
    This seems like it should be easy, but for some reason I'm having no luck. I'm migrating an existing WebForms app to MVC, so I need to keep the root of the site pointing to my existing aspx pages for now and only apply routing to named routes. Here's what I have: public static void RegisterRoutes(RouteCollection routes) { routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}"); routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.aspx/{*pathInfo}"); RouteTable.Routes.Add( "Root", new Route("", new DefaultRouteHandler()) ); routes.MapRoute( "Default", // Route name "{controller}/{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters new { controller = "Calendar2", action = "Index", id = "" } // Parameter defaults ); } So aspx pages should be ignored, and the default root url should be handled by this handler: public class DefaultRouteHandler : IRouteHandler { public IHttpHandler GetHttpHandler(RequestContext requestContext) { return System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.CreateInstanceFromVirtualPath( "~/Dashboard/default.aspx", typeof(Page)) as IHttpHandler; } } This seems to work OK, but the resulting YPOD gives me this: Multiple controls with the same ID '__Page' were found. Trace requires that controls have unique IDs. which seems to imply that the page is somehow getting rendered twice. If I simply type in the url to my dashboard page directly it works fine (no routing, no error). I have no idea why the handler code would be doing anything differently. Bottom line -- I'd like to simply redirect the root url path to an aspx of my choosing -- can anyone shed some light?

    Read the article

  • Does Security Trimming work with Web Forms Routing?

    - by Slauma
    In my web.config I have configured a SiteMapProvider with securityTrimmingEnabled="true" and on my main master page is an asp:Menu control bound to an asp:SiteMapDataSource. In addition I have configured restricted access to all pages in a subfolder "Admin" (using another web.config in this subfolder). If I put a sitemapNode in Web.sitemap... <siteMapNode url="~/Admin/Default.aspx" title="Administration" description="" > ... only users in role "Admin" will have the menu item related to that siteMapNode. So this is working fine and as intended. Now I have defined a URL route in Global.asax to map the physical file to a new URL: System.Web.Routing.RouteTable.Routes.MapPageRoute("AdminHomeRoute", "Administration/Home", "~/Admin/Default.aspx"); But when I use this route-URL in the SiteMap file... <siteMapNode url="Administration/Home" title="Administration" description="" > ... it seems that security trimming does not work: The menu item is visible for all users. (Access to the page is still restricted though, so selecting the menu item by non-Admin users does not navigate to the restricted page.) Question: Is there any setting I've missed so far to make security trimming working with URL routing in ASP.NET 4.0 Web Forms? Did I do something wrong? Is there any work-around? Thank you for help!

    Read the article

  • Rails 3.0.0.beta and Facebooker: anyone else seeing the following?

    - by nafe
    Hi all, My rails server seems to break after installing the facebooker plugin. Any suggestions on fixing this would be great. I'm using rails 3.0.0.beta and facebooker. Here are the steps and the error that I'm seeing: $ rails -v Rails 3.0.0.beta $ rails break; cd break $ ./script/rails plugin install git://github.com/mmangino/facebooker.git $ vim Rakefile #and add "require 'tasks/facebooker'" $ ./script/rails server => Booting WEBrick => Rails 3.0.0.beta application starting in development on http://0.0.0.0:3000 => Call with -d to detach => Ctrl-C to shutdown server Exiting /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:456:in `load_missing_constant': uninitialized constant ActiveSupport::CoreExtensions (NameError) from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:91:in `const_missing' from /path/break/vendor/plugins/facebooker/lib/facebooker/adapters/adapter_base.rb:6 from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:537:in `new_constants_in' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /path/break/vendor/plugins/facebooker/lib/facebooker.rb:252 from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:537:in `new_constants_in' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /path/break/vendor/plugins/facebooker/rails/../init.rb:5 from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:537:in `new_constants_in' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /path/break/vendor/plugins/facebooker/rails/init.rb:1 from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/plugin.rb:49 from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/initializable.rb:25:in `instance_exec' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/initializable.rb:25:in `run' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/initializable.rb:55:in `run_initializers' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/initializable.rb:54:in `each' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/initializable.rb:54:in `run_initializers' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/application.rb:71:in `initialize!' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/application.rb:41:in `send' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/application.rb:41:in `method_missing' from /path/break/config/environment.rb:5 from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:537:in `new_constants_in' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from config.ru:3 from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/builder.rb:46:in `instance_eval' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/builder.rb:46:in `initialize' from config.ru:1:in `new' from config.ru:1

    Read the article

  • what is the best to use - ruby gems or ruby plugins

    - by sameera207
    Hi All, What is the best practice when creating a rails project 1 - is it good to use ruby gems 2 - or is it good to use ruby plugins (as almost all the gems has their plugin versions) and what are the strengths and weaknesses of eachoption consider we are creating the rails project with rails 2.x.x or rails 3 thanks in advance cheers, sameera

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC Routing Via Method Attributes

    - by TorgoGuy
    In the StackOverflow Podcast #54, Jeff mentions they register their URL routes in the StackOverflow codebase via an attribute above the method that handles the route. Sounds like a good concept (with the caveat that Phil Haack brought up regarding route priorities). Could someone provide some sample to to make this happen? Also, any "best practices" for using this style of routing?

    Read the article

  • How to create Ror style Restful routing in Asp.net MVC Web Api

    - by Jas
    How to configure routing in asp.net web api, to that I can code for the following actions in my ApiController inherited class? |======================================================================================| |Http Verb| Path | Action | Used for | |======================================================================================| | GET | /photos | index | display a list of all photos | | GET | /photos/new | new | return an HTML form for creating a new photo | | POST | /photos/ | create | create a new photo | | GET | /photos/:id | show | display a specific photo | | GET | /photos/:id/edit | edit | return an HTML form for editing a photo | | PUT | /photos/:id | update | update a specific photo | | DELETE | /photos/:id | destroy | delete a specific photo |

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET 4.0 Routing and Subfolders

    - by IrishChieftain
    I have a folder structure like this: Site/About/About.aspx I have a link in a user control like this: <a href="~/About/About" id="aboutLink" title="About" runat="server">About</a> And in my RegisterRoutes() method, I have this: routes.MapPageRoute("", "About/About/", "~/About/About.aspx"); It works but produces the following URL: Site/About/About What I would like is this: Site/About Is this possible with out-of-the-box 4.0 routing?

    Read the article

  • Rails version not shown post installation

    - by mgj
    Hi all, I had installed rubygems 1.8 and further on I had installed the rails 2.0.2 gem. When I tried to view the rails version installed through the command rails -v It didn't work.. I am unable to figure out why I am getting an "invalid option" on executing the command rails -v ( Please refer the below for the same). mohnish@mohnish-laptop:~/Downloads$ ruby -v ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i486-linux] mohnish@mohnish-laptop:~/Downloads$ gem list *** LOCAL GEMS *** actionmailer (2.0.2) actionpack (2.0.2) activerecord (2.0.2) activeresource (2.0.2) activesupport (2.0.2) rails (2.0.2) rake (0.8.7) mohnish@mohnish-laptop:~/Downloads$ rails -v getopt: invalid option -- 'v' Terminating... mohnish@mohnish-laptop:~/Downloads$ Could you please help me out on this regard.. Please note I am currently not making use of the ruby version manager(rvm). Please let me know if I could get a solution once I install the rvm. Thanks for your help..

    Read the article

  • "Malformed version number string mingw32" when starting rails

    - by Freewind
    My os: windows xp, ruby: 1.8.7, rails: 2.3.5 Everything was fine, but I just installed a "gcc-4.4.0-mingw32-bin", and run gem install rdiscount, then my rails can't start. Now when I run ruby script/server, or rake gems:install, the following error will occur: rake aborted! Malformed version number string mingw32 (See full trace by running task with --trace) E:\WORKSPACE_TOPCODER\wenda_ror>ruby script/server => Booting Mongrel => Rails 2.3.5 application starting on http://0.0.0.0:3000 E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/version.rb:182:in `initialize': Malformed version number string mingw32 (ArgumentError) from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/vendor_gem_source_index.rb:105:in `new' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/vendor_gem_source_index.rb:105:in `version_for_dir' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/vendor_gem_source_index.rb:47:in `refresh!' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/vendor_gem_source_index.rb:45:in `each' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/vendor_gem_source_index.rb:45:in `refresh!' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/vendor_gem_source_index.rb:29:in `initialize' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/gem_dependency.rb:21:in `new' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/gem_dependency.rb:21:in `add_frozen_gem_path' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/initializer.rb:298:in `add_gem_load_paths' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/initializer.rb:132:in `process' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/initializer.rb:113:in `send' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/initializer.rb:113:in `run' from E:/WORKSPACE_TOPCODER/wenda_ror/config/environment.rb:9 from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.3.5/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:156:in `require' Now I have re-installed my ruby and rails, but the same error still occurs. And I have searched in google, found no solution. It seems I have to re-install my windows xp. Somebody knows the reason? Help...

    Read the article

  • Installing Rails 3 - /usr/local/bin/rails: No such file or directory

    - by viatropos
    I just ran these two commands: sudo gem install rails --pre sudo gem install railties --pre Now when I run rails myapp, I get this: -bash: /usr/local/bin/rails: No such file or directory Here's some system info: $ ruby -v ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [i686-darwin9.7.0] $ sudo gem update --system Updating RubyGems Nothing to update I tried copy/pasting the bin/rails file into /usr/local/bin/rails, and changing permissions to sudo chmod 755 /usr/local/bin/rails, but that doesn't work. Any ideas how to get up and running?

    Read the article

  • Avoiding the Controller with Routing Rules in ASP.NET MVC

    - by Ryan Elkins
    I've created a website with ASP.NET MVC. I have a number of static pages that I am currently serving through a single controller called Home. This creates some rather ugly URLs. example.com/Home/About example.com/Home/ContactUs example.com/Home/Features You get the idea. I'd rather not have to create a controller for each one of these as the actions simply call the View with no model being passed in. Is there a way to write a routing rule that will remove the controller from the URL? I'd like it to look like: example.com/About example.com/ContactUs example.com/Features If not, how is this situation normally handled? I imagine I'm not the first person to run in to this.

    Read the article

  • Routing with command controller and sub controllers without using areas

    - by user205258
    How can I create a routing structure for a project management application where there are discrete controllers for all the relevant pieces such as TaskController, DocumentController etc and an Over arching controller. I would essentially like a structure like: http://server/Project/123/Task http://server/Project/123/Document I am using mvc1 so I have no access to areas etc. The project section will have a separate master page for project controllers such as task, document etc with a dfferent menu navigaton. I have tried three routes together n Global.asax like: routes.MapRoute( "Task", "Project/{id}/Task/{action}", new { controller = "Task", action = "Index", id = "" } ); routes.MapRoute( "Message", "Project/{id}/Message/{action}", new { controller = "Message", action = "Index", id = "" } ); routes.MapRoute( "Document", "Project/{id}/Document/{action}", new { controller = "Document", action = "Index", id = "" } ); What am I doing wrong here

    Read the article

  • Strange routing

    - by astropanic
    How I can setup my rails app to respond to such urls: http://mydomain.com/white-halogene-lamp http://mydomain.com/children-lamps http://mydomain.com/contact-form The first one should link to my products controller, and show my product with this name The second one should link to my categories controller, and show the category with this name The third one should link to my sites controller, and show the site with this title. All three models (product, category, site) have a method to_seo, giving the mentioned above urls (after the slash) I know it's not the restful way, but please don't disuss here, it is wrong approach or not, that's not the question. The question is how to accomplish this weird routing ? I know we have catch all routes, but how I can tell rails to use different controllers on different urls in the catch all route ? Or have You an better idea ? I would avoid redirects to other urls.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET 4.0 webforms routing

    - by Ethan
    I have an existing site that I'd like to convert to use routing, and after reading Scott Guthrie's post here, I built a working sample that works for most circumstances. However, since not all of the pages on the existing site match a particular pattern, I'll need to check against a database to determine which route (destination .aspx page) to use. For example, most pages are like this: http://www.mysite.com/people/person.html This is fine - I can easily route these to the view_person.aspx page because of the 'people' directory. But some pages are like this: http://www.mysite.com/category_page.html http://www.mysite.com/product_page.html This necessitates checking the database to see whether to route to the view_category.aspx page or the view_product.aspx page. And this is where I'm stuck. Do I create an IRouteHandler that checks the database and returns the route? Or is there a better way? The only code I've found that kind of fits is the answer to this question. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Which version of rails should I install with ruby 2.0.0 installed?

    - by Ekin Hazal
    Hi I am building a ROR development environment on a new computer with windows 7, now I have Ruby version 2.0.0 and Gems version 2.2.2 installed. Which version of Rails should I install? I saw this on rubyonrails.org/download : "We recommend Ruby 2.1.0 for use with Rails. We stopped supporting Ruby 1.8.x after Rails 3.2. Ruby 1.9.2+ will be supported until Rails 5." I will be working on a long-time project, I'm just trying to lessen the headaches I will have later. Right now, the latest Rails -v is 4.1.0 and they recommend Ruby 2.1.0 for use with Rails. I think the best option is to go with this set. Any other thoughts?

    Read the article

  • Sub routing in a SPA site

    - by Anders
    I have a SPA site that I'm working on, I have a requirement that you can have subroutes for a page view model. Im currently using this 'pattern' for the site MyApp.FooViewModel = MyApp.define({ meta: { query: MyApp.Core.Contracts.Queries.FooQuery, title: "Foo" }, init: function (queryResult) { }, prototype: { } }); In the master view model I have a route table this.navigation(new MyApp.RoutesViewModel({ Home: { model: MyApp.HomeViewModel, route: String.empty }, Foo: { model: MyApp.FooViewModel } })); The meta object defines which query should populate the top level view model when its invoked through sammyjs, this is all fine but it does not support sub routing My plan is to change the meta object so that it can (optional offcourse) look like this meta: { query: MyApp.Core.Contracts.Queries.FooQuery, title: "Foo", route: { barId: MyApp.BarViewModel } } When sammyjs detects a barId in the query string the Barmodel will be executed and populated through its own meta object. Is this a good design?

    Read the article

  • Ruby on Rails wildcard routing such as /foo.htm /foo.php /foo.something

    - by fregas
    I'm trying to create a routing situation where by default, any URL's such as this: /foo /something /foo.php /somethingelse.xml /something.something.else etc. will all route to one controller, assuming they don't route anywhere else. i can get this to work with the following code in my routes: map.myroute '/:file_or_folder', :controller = 'mycontroller' this works fine as long as there are no dots in the URL: /something but this wont work: /something.foo any ideas?

    Read the article

  • RoR Beginner Routing error

    - by WANNABE
    I've created a DB and a table within that DB called genre. Now when I try to connect to this using the URL, I get the following error message: Routing Error No route matches "/genre" with {:method=:get} Thanks for your help in advance.

    Read the article

  • Changing the id parameter in Rails routing

    - by japancheese
    Hello, Using rails3 new routing system, is it possible to change the default :id parameter resources :users, :key => :username come out with the following routes /users/new /users/:username /users/:username/edit ...etc I'm asking because although the above example is simple, it would be really helpful to do in a current project I'm working on. Is it possible to change this parameter, and if not, is there a particular reason as to why not?

    Read the article

  • Rails help looping trough has one and belongs to association

    - by Rails beginner
    This is my kategori controller show action: def show @kategori = Kategori.find(params[:id]) @konkurrancer = @kategori.konkurrancer respond_to do |format| format.html # show.html.erb format.xml { render :xml => @kategori } end end This is kategori view show file: <% @konkurrancer.each do |vind| %> <td><%= vind.name %></td> <td>4 ud af 5</td> <td><%= number_to_currency(vind.vaerdi, :unit => "DKK", :separator => ".", :delimiter => ".", :format => "%n %u", :precision => 0) %></td> <td>2 min</td> <td>Nyhedsbrev</td> <td><%= vind.udtraekkes.strftime("%d %B") %></td> </tr> <% end %> My kategori model: class Kategori < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :konkurrancer end My konkurrancer model: class Konkurrancer < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :kategori end I want show all of the konkurrancer that have an association to the kategori model With my code I get the following error: NoMethodError in Kategoris#show Showing C:/Rails/konkurranceportalen/app/views/kategoris/show.html.erb where line #12 raised: undefined method `each' for "#":Konkurrancer

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >