Search Results

Search found 64 results on 3 pages for 'rjs'.

Page 3/3 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 

  • rails ajax redirect

    - by badnaam
    Here is my use case I have a search model with two actions search_set and search_show. 1 - A user loads the home page which contains a search_form, rendered via a partial (search_form). 2 - User does a search, and the request goes to search_set, the search is saved and a redirect happens to search_show page which again renders the search_form with the saved search preferences. This search form is different than the one if step1, because it's a remote form being submitted to the same action (search set) 3 - Now the user does another search, and the search form is submitted via ajax to the search_set action. The search is saved and executed and now I need to present the result via rjs templates (corresponding to search_show). I am told that if the request is xhr then I can't redirect to the search_show action? Is that right? If yes, how do I handle this? Here is my controller class http://pastie.org/993460 Thanks

    Read the article

  • Lighttpd - byte range request doesn't work. can't stream mp4

    - by w-01
    Am attempting to use the lastest flowplayer. (if it could work it would be pretty awesome btw) http://flowplayer.org One of the cool things about it is it uses the new HTML5 video element and supports random seeking/playback. In order to do this, you need a byte range request capable server on the backend. Luckily I'm using Lighttpd 1.5.0 on the backend. Unfortunately the current behavior is that when I do a random seek, the video simply restarts itself from the beginning. the docs say: "For HTML5 video you don't have to do any client side configuration. If your server supports byte range requests then seeking should work on the fly. Most servers including Apache, Nginx and Lighttpd support this." On my page, using chrome web developer tools, i can see when the video is requested, the server response headers indicate it is able to acce[t byte ranges. Accept-Ranges:bytes when I do random seek in the player, I can see that that byte ranges are request appropriately in the request header: Range: bytes=5668-10785 I can also verify the moov atom is at the front of the video file. My question here is if there is something else on the lighttpd side i'm missing in order to enable byte-range requests? The reason i ask is because the current behavior suggests that the lighttpd simply doesn't understand the byte range request and is just reserving the video from the beginning. Update it's clearer to put this here. As per RJS' suggestion I ran a curl command. in the response it looks like lighttpd is working as expected. Content-Range: bytes 1602355-18844965/18844966 Content-Length: 17242611

    Read the article

  • Rails 3 - Category Filter Using Select - Load Partial Via Ajax

    - by fourfour
    Hey. I am trying to filter Client Comments by using a select and rendering it in a partial. Right now the partial loads @client.comments. I have a Category model with a Categorizations join. This all works, just need to know how to get the select to call the filter action and load the partial with ajax. Thanks for you help. Categories controller: def filter_category @categories = Category.all respond_to do |format| format.js # filter.rjs end end filter.js.erb: page.replace_html 'client-not-inner', :partial => 'comments', :locals => { :com => Category.first.comments } show.html.erb (clients) <% form_tag(filter_category_path(:id), :method => :put, :class => 'categories', :remote => true, :controller => 'categoires', :action => 'filter') do %> <label>Categories</label> <%= select_tag(:category, options_for_select(Category.all.map {|category| [category.name, category.id]}, @category_id)) %> <% end %> <div class="client-note-inner"> <%= render :partial => 'comments', :locals => { :com => @comments } %> </div><!--end client-note-inner--> Hope that makes sense. Cheers.

    Read the article

  • Rails: Ajax: Changes Onload

    - by Jay Godse
    Hi. I have a web layout of a for that looks something like this <html> <head> </head> <body> <div id="posts"> <div id="post1" class="post" > <!--stuff 1--> </div> <div id="post2" class="post" > <!--stuff 1--> </div> <!-- 96 more posts --> <div id="post99" class="post" > <!--stuff 1--> </div> </div> </body> </html> I would like to be able to load and render the page with a blank , and then have a function called when the page is loaded which goes in and load up the posts and updates the page dynamically. In Rails, I tried using "link_to_remote" to update with all of the elements. I also tweaked the posts controller to render the collection of posts if it was an ajax request (request.xhr?). It worked fine and very fast. However the update of the blank div is triggered by clicking the link. I would like the same action to happen when the page is loaded so that I don't have to put in a link. Is there a Rails Ajax helper or RJS function or something in Rails that I could use to trigger the loading of the "posts" after the page has loaded and rendered (without the posts)? (If putsch comes to shove, I will just copy the generated JS code from the link_to_remote call and have it called from the onload handler on the body).

    Read the article

  • rails best practices where to place unobtrusive javascript

    - by nathanvda
    Hi there, my rails applications (all 2.3.5) use a total mix of inline javascript, rjs, prototype and jquery. Let's call it learning or growing pains. Lately i have been more and more infatuated with unobtrusive javascript. It makes your html clean, in the same way css cleaned it up. But most examples i have seen are small examples, and they put all javascript(jquery) inside application.js Now i have a pretty big application, and i am thinking up ways to structure my js. I like somehow that my script is still close to the view, so i am thinking something like orders.html.erb orders.js where orders.js contains the unobtrusive javascript specific to that view. But maybe that's just me being too conservative :) I have read some posts by Yehuda Katz about this very problem here and here, where he tackles this problem. It will go through your js-files and only load those relevant to your view. But alas i can't find a current implementation. So my questions: how do you best structure your unobtrusive javascript; manage your code, how do you make sure that it is obvious from the html what something is supposed to do. I guess good class names go a long way :) how do you arrange your files, load them all in? just a few? do you use content_for :script or javascript_include_tag in your view to load the relevant scripts. Or ... ? do you write very generic functions (like a delete), with parameters (add extra attributes?), or do you write very specific functions (DRY?). I know in Rails 3 there is a standard set, and everything is unobtrusive there. But how to start in Rails 2.3.5? In short: what are the best practices for doing unobtrusive javascript in rails? :)

    Read the article

  • Rspec stubing view for anonymous controller

    - by Colin G
    I'm trying to test a method on the application controller that will be used as a before filter. To do this I have setup an anonymous controller in my test with the before filter applied to ensure that it functions correctly. The test currently looks like this: describe ApplicationController do controller do before_filter :authenticated def index end end describe "user authenticated" do let(:session_id){"session_id"} let(:user){OpenStruct.new(:email => "[email protected]", :name => "Colin Gemmell")} before do request.cookies[:session_id] = session_id UserSession.stub!(:find).with(session_id).and_return(user) get :index end it { should assign_to(:user){user} } end end And the application controller is like this: class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base protect_from_forgery def authenticated @user = nil end end My problem is when ever I run the test I'm getting the following error 1) ApplicationController user authenticated Failure/Error: get :index ActionView::MissingTemplate: Missing template stub_resources/index with {:handlers=>[:erb, :rjs, :builder, :rhtml, :rxml, :haml], :formats=>[:html], :locale=>[:en, :en]} in view paths "#<RSpec::Rails::ViewRendering::PathSetDelegatorResolver:0x984f310>" According to the docs the view is not rendered when running controller tests however this points to no stub existing for this action (which is understandable as the view doesn't exist) Anyone have a clue how to solve this problem or stub the view out. Cheers Colin G

    Read the article

  • Rails 3 shows 404 error instead of index.html (nginx + unicorn)

    - by Miko
    I have an index.html in public/ that should be loading by default but instead I get a 404 error when I try to access http://example.com/ The page you were looking for doesn't exist. You may have mistyped the address or the page may have moved. This has something to do with nginx and unicorn which I am using to power Rails 3 When take unicorn out of the nginx configuration file, the problem goes away and index.html loads just fine. Here is my nginx configuration file: upstream unicorn { server unix:/tmp/.sock fail_timeout=0; } server { server_name example.com; root /www/example.com/current/public; index index.html; keepalive_timeout 5; location / { try_files $uri @unicorn; } location @unicorn { proxy_pass http://unicorn; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_redirect off; } } My config/routes.rb is pretty much empty: Advertise::Application.routes.draw do |map| resources :users end The index.html file is located in public/index.html and it loads fine if I request it directly: http://example.com/index.html To reiterate, when I remove all references to unicorn from the nginx conf, index.html loads without any problems, I have a hard time understanding why this occurs because nginx should be trying to load that file on its own by default. -- Here is the error stack from production.log: Started GET "/" for 68.107.80.21 at 2010-08-08 12:06:29 -0700 Processing by HomeController#index as HTML Completed in 1ms ActionView::MissingTemplate (Missing template home/index with {:handlers=>[:erb, :rjs, :builder, :rhtml, :rxml, :haml], :formats=>[:html], :locale=>[:en, :en]} in view paths "/www/example.com/releases/20100808170224/app/views", "/www/example.com/releases/20100808170224/vendor/plugins/paperclip/app/views", "/www/example.com/releases/20100808170224/vendor/plugins/haml/app/views"): /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-rc2/gems/actionpack-3.0.0.beta4/lib/action_view/paths.rb:14:in `find' /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-rc2/gems/actionpack-3.0.0.beta4/lib/action_view/lookup_context.rb:79:in `find' /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-rc2/gems/actionpack-3.0.0.beta4/lib/action_view/base.rb:186:in `find_template' /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-rc2/gems/actionpack-3.0.0.beta4/lib/action_view/render/rendering.rb:45:in `_determine_template' /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-rc2/gems/actionpack-3.0.0.beta4/lib/action_view/render/rendering.rb:23:in `render' /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-rc2/gems/haml-3.0.15/lib/haml/helpers/action_view_mods.rb:13:in `render_with_haml' etc... -- nginx error log for this virtualhost comes up empty: 2010/08/08 12:40:22 [info] 3118#0: *1 client 68.107.80.21 closed keepalive connection My guess is unicorn is intercepting the request to index.html before nginx gets to process it.

    Read the article

  • Rails 3 shows 404 error instead of index.html (nginx + unicorn)

    - by Miko
    I have an index.html in public/ that should be loading by default but instead I get a 404 error when I try to access http://example.com/ The page you were looking for doesn't exist. You may have mistyped the address or the page may have moved. This has something to do with nginx and unicorn which I am using to power Rails 3 When take unicorn out of the nginx configuration file, the problem goes away and index.html loads just fine. Here is my nginx configuration file: upstream unicorn { server unix:/tmp/.sock fail_timeout=0; } server { server_name example.com; root /www/example.com/current/public; index index.html; keepalive_timeout 5; location / { try_files $uri @unicorn; } location @unicorn { proxy_pass http://unicorn; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_redirect off; } } My config/routes.rb is pretty much empty: Advertise::Application.routes.draw do |map| resources :users end The index.html file is located in public/index.html and it loads fine if I request it directly: http://example.com/index.html To reiterate, when I remove all references to unicorn from the nginx conf, index.html loads without any problems, I have a hard time understanding why this occurs because nginx should be trying to load that file on its own by default. -- Here is the error stack from production.log: Started GET "/" for 68.107.80.21 at 2010-08-08 12:06:29 -0700 Processing by HomeController#index as HTML Completed in 1ms ActionView::MissingTemplate (Missing template home/index with {:handlers=>[:erb, :rjs, :builder, :rhtml, :rxml, :haml], :formats=>[:html], :locale=>[:en, :en]} in view paths "/www/example.com/releases/20100808170224/app/views", "/www/example.com/releases/20100808170224/vendor/plugins/paperclip/app/views", "/www/example.com/releases/20100808170224/vendor/plugins/haml/app/views"): /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-rc2/gems/actionpack-3.0.0.beta4/lib/action_view/paths.rb:14:in `find' /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-rc2/gems/actionpack-3.0.0.beta4/lib/action_view/lookup_context.rb:79:in `find' /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-rc2/gems/actionpack-3.0.0.beta4/lib/action_view/base.rb:186:in `find_template' /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-rc2/gems/actionpack-3.0.0.beta4/lib/action_view/render/rendering.rb:45:in `_determine_template' /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-rc2/gems/actionpack-3.0.0.beta4/lib/action_view/render/rendering.rb:23:in `render' /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-rc2/gems/haml-3.0.15/lib/haml/helpers/action_view_mods.rb:13:in `render_with_haml' etc... -- nginx error log for this virtualhost comes up empty: 2010/08/08 12:40:22 [info] 3118#0: *1 client 68.107.80.21 closed keepalive connection My guess is unicorn is intercepting the request to index.html before nginx gets to process it.

    Read the article

  • Infragistics UltraWebTab

    - by user354089
    Im using Infragistcs UltraWebTab. The code is shown below ` <div class="tab-content"> <asp:Panel ID="PnlGeneral" runat="server"> <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="tab-list"> <tr> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:Label ID="LblErrors" runat="server" CssClass="ErrorMessage1"></asp:Label> <asp:Label ID="LblSuccessMsg" runat="server" CssClass="SuccessMessage1"></asp:Label> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" border="0" class="tab-list"> <tr> <th width="205" class="FormLabel1"> Campaign Name <span class="ErrorMessage">*</span> </th> <td width="80%"> <asp:TextBox ID="TxtCampaignName" runat="server" CssClass="TextBox1"></asp:TextBox> </td> </tr> <tr> <th width="205" class="FormLabel1"> CRM Name <span class="ErrorMessage">*</span> </th> <td width="80%"> <asp:TextBox ID="TxtCRMName" runat="server" CssClass="TextBox1"></asp:TextBox> </td> </tr> <tr> <th class="FormLabel1"> Campaign Type <span class="ErrorMessage">*</span> </th> <td> <asp:DropDownList ID="DDLCampaignType" runat="server" CssClass="TextBox1" AutoPostBack="true" Width="117px" OnSelectedIndexChanged="DDLCampaignType_SelectedIndexChanged"> </asp:DropDownList> </td> </tr> <tr visible="false" id="trCompanyRow" runat="server"> <th class="FormLabel1"> Company <span class="ErrorMessage">*</span> </th> <td> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%"> <tr> <td class="style2" style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:DropDownList ID="DDLCompany" runat="server" CssClass="TextBox1" Width="117px" OnSelectedIndexChanged="DDLCompany_SelectedIndexChanged"> </asp:DropDownList> </td> <td class="style3" style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:LinkButton ID="btnlnknewCompany" runat="server" Style="font-size: 100%;" Text="Add New" OnClick="btnlnknewCompany_Click"></asp:LinkButton> </td> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%" id="tdNewComapny" visible="false" runat="server"> <tr> <td class="style4" style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:TextBox ID="txtCompanyName" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> </td> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:Button ID="btnCompanyAdd" runat="server" CssClass="btn1" Height="20px" Text="Add" Width="25%" OnClick="btnCompanyAdd_Click" /> </td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> <tr id="trBannerImage" runat="server" visible="false"> <th class="FormLabel1"> Banner Image <span class="ErrorMessage">*</span> </th> <td> <asp:FileUpload ID="FileUploadBannerImage" runat="server" ToolTip="Add images for banner" /> </td> </tr> <tr> <th class="FormLabel1"> Start Date <span class="ErrorMessage">*</span> </th> <td> <asp:TextBox ID="TxtStartDate" runat="server" CssClass="TextBox1"></asp:TextBox><rjs:PopCalendar ID="CalStartDate" runat="server" Control="TxtStartDate" Format="dd mm yyyy" ShowErrorMessage="false" /> &nbsp;dd-mm-yyyy </td> </tr> <tr> <th class="FormLabel1"> End Date <span class="ErrorMessage">*</span> </th> <td> <asp:TextBox ID="TxtEndDate" runat="server" CssClass="TextBox1"></asp:TextBox><rjs:PopCalendar ID="CalEndDate" runat="server" Control="TxtEndDate" Format="dd mm yyyy" ShowErrorMessage="false" /> &nbsp;dd-mm-yyyy </td> </tr> <tr> <th class="FormLabel1"> Enabled? </th> <td> <asp:CheckBox ID="ChkEnabled" runat="server" /> </td> </tr> <tr style="border-bottom-color: White" id="tblVerificationFields" visible="false" runat="server"> <th style="border-bottom-color: White"> Company's Verification Fields </th> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="tab-form" width="100%"> <tr> <td colspan="3" align="center"> <br /> <p> <label style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; text-align: center;"> Select from existing verification fields below</label></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <asp:Repeater ID="RptrVeriFieldsParamType" runat="server"> <HeaderTemplate> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tab-grid" style="border: 0px"> <tr> <th> </th> <th> Field Name </th> <th> Type </th> <th> </th> </tr> </HeaderTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <tr> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:CheckBox ID="RptrChkVeriFields" runat="server" /> </td> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:Label ID="RptrFieldName" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("FieldName") %>'> </asp:Label> </td> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:Label ID="RptrParamterTypeName" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("PARAMETERTYPENAME") %>'> </asp:Label> </td> <td> <asp:Label ID="RptrHdnFieldId" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("FIELDID") %>' Visible="false"></asp:Label> </td> </tr> </ItemTemplate> <FooterTemplate> </table> </FooterTemplate> </asp:Repeater> </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="border-bottom-color: White"> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" runat="server"> <tr> <td colspan="6" style="border-bottom-color: White" align="center"> <br /> <p> <label style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; text-align: center; width: 100%;"> Or Add New verification field</label> </p> </td> </tr> <tr id="trVerifcationFields" runat="server" visible="false"> <th style="border-bottom-color: White" width="110px"> <strong>Verification Name</strong> </th> <td style="border-bottom-color: White" width="50px"> <asp:TextBox ID="TxtVeriField" runat="server"> </asp:TextBox> </td> <th style="border-bottom-color: White" width="100px"> <strong>Parameter Type</strong> </th> <td style="border-bottom-color: White" width="100px"> <asp:DropDownList ID="DDLParameterType" runat="server"> </asp:DropDownList> </td> <th> </th> <td align="left" style="border-bottom-color: White"> <asp:Button ID="BtnAddVeriField" runat="server" CssClass="btn1" Height="20px" Text="Add" OnClick="BtnAddVeriField_Click" Width="75%" /> </td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" border="0" class="tab-list"> <tr align="right"> <td> </td> <td align="right" class="tab-list"> <asp:Button runat="server" ID="Next" Visible="true" Text="Next >" CssClass="btn" /> </td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table> </asp:Panel> </div> </ContentTemplate> </igtab:Tab> <igtab:Tab Text="CRM Deals (Step-2)" Key="Tab2"> <ContentTemplate> <div style="clear: both"> </div> <div class="tab-content"> <asp:Panel ID="PnlCRMDeals" runat="server" ScrollBars="Vertical" Height="500px"> <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="tab-list"> <tr> <td> <asp:GridView ID="GridDeals" AutoGenerateColumns="False" runat="server" BorderStyle="none" BorderWidth="0" CellPadding="0" CellSpacing="0" GridLines="None" ShowFooter="false" HorizontalAlign="Left" CssClass="tab-grid" Width="100%"> <HeaderStyle CssClass="header" HorizontalAlign="Center" /> <PagerStyle CssClass="pager" /> <AlternatingRowStyle CssClass="odd" /> <Columns> <asp:TemplateField> <ItemStyle Width="5%" /> <ItemTemplate> <asp:CheckBox ID="ChkDeals" runat="server" Visible="true" /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Deal Name"> <ItemStyle Width="25%" /> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="DealName" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("DealName") %>' /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Name in CRM"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="CRMDealName" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("CRM_NAME") %>' /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Deal Code"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="PartNum" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("PARTNUM") %>' /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> </Columns> </asp:GridView> </td> </tr> </table> </asp:Panel> </div> </ContentTemplate> </igtab:Tab> ` The problem im facing is after the "BtnAddVeriField" add button is clicked the Panel for the next tab gets displayed below the first tab's Panel. Furthermore, that Add button is not displayed as well.

    Read the article

  • Facebook Connect icon isn't showing up in Internet Explorer

    - by John Duff
    I'm working on a site that is using Facebook Connect and recently made some changes so that the main pages are cached and if you are not logged in (checked with an ajax call) it loads the Facebook Connect javascript and renders the connect button into the page. This works perfectly everywhere except Internet Explorer 7 and 8. The weird part is I render the buttons into a hidden Sign Up / Sign In form and when you show either of those the Connect buttons appear. You can take a look here and you will see the button in Firefox and not Internet Explorer. If you click Sign In the button will show up. This is a Rails app so on the server-side we're responding to an ajax call with rjs like this: page['signin-status'].replace(:partial => "common/layout/signin_menu") page.select('.facebook-connect').each do |value, index| value.replace(render(:partial => '/facebook/signin')) end page << <<-eos LazyLoader.load('http://static.ak.connect.facebook.com/js/api_lib/v0.4/FeatureLoader.js.php', function(){ FB.init('#{Facebooker.api_key}','/xd_receiver.html'); }); eos The first line is replacing the header, the second is the Connect buttons in the Modal dialogs. The partial being rendered into the header looks like this: <span id='signin-status'> <%= fb_login_button(remote_function(:url => "/facebook/connect"))%> | <%= link_to_function "Sign In", "showSignInForm();", :id => "signin" %> | <%= link_to_function "Sign Up", "showSignUpForm();", :id => "signup" %> </span> The Partial being rendered into the Modal dialogs looks like this: <div class='facebook-connect'> <div id="FB_HiddenContainer" style="position:absolute; top:-10000px; width:0px; height:0px;" ></div> <label>Or sign in with your Facebook account</label> <%= fb_login_button(remote_function(:url => "/facebook/connect"))%> </div> I find it very strange that showing the Modal dialog causes all the icons to show. Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions about what's going on?

    Read the article

  • Rails, Edit page update in a window

    - by Mike
    I have my code working so that I have a table of businesses. There's a pencil icon you can click on the edit the business information. The edit information comes up in a partial inside of a modal pop up box. The only problem is that once they make the changes they want and click update, it sends them to the 'show' page for that business. What I want to happen is have the pop up box close and have it update the information. This is my update function in my controller. def update @business = Business.find(params[:id]) respond_to do |format| if @business.update_attributes(params[:business]) flash[:notice] = 'Business was successfully updated.' format.html { redirect_to(business_url(@business)) } format.js else format.html { render :action => "edit" } format.xml { render :xml => @business.errors, :status => :unprocessable_entity } end end end I tried following railscast 43 and i created an .rjs file but I couldn't get that to work at all. My update was still taking me to the show page. Any help would be appreciated. EDIT: Added some more code. <% form_for(@business) do |f| %> <%= f.error_messages %> <p> <%= f.label :name %><br /> <%= f.text_field :name %> </p> ... <%= f.label :business_category %><br /> <%= f.select :business_category_id, @business_categories_map, :selected => @business.business_category_id %> </p> <p> <%= f.label :description %><br /> <%= f.text_area :description %> </p> <p> <%= f.submit 'Update' %> </p> <% end %> This is my form inside of my edit page which is being called through the index in a pop up by: <div id="popupEdit<%=h business.id %>" class="popupContact"> <a class="popupClose<%=h business.id %>" id="popupClose">x</a> <% if business.business_category_id %> <% @business = business %> <%= render "business/edit" %> <% end %> </div>

    Read the article

  • remote_form_for in index.html.erb file not working w/ AJAX...Ruby on Rails...

    - by bgadoci
    Just curious if I am overlooking something simple here. I have deployed the remote_form_for in the show.html.erb code before to render comments on a post (project in this case) without a problem. I have moved this code to the index view and seems to degrade to the normal form_for action (page refresh). I am not getting any javascript errors so not sure what is wrong here. Here is my code: index.html.erb <% remote_form_for [project, Comment.new] do |f| %> <p> <%= f.label :body, "New Comment" %><br/> <%= f.text_area (:body, :class => "textarea") %> </p> <p> <%= f.label :name, "Name" %> (Required)<br/> <%= f.text_field (:name, :class => "textfield") %> </p> <p> <%= f.label :email, "Email" %> (Required but will not be displayed)<br/> <%= f.text_field (:email, :class => "textfield") %> </p> <p><%= f.submit "Add Comment" %></p> <% end %> CommentsController#create def create @project = Project.find(params[:project_id]) @comment = @project.comments.create!(params[:comment]) respond_to do |format| format.html { redirect_to projects_path } format.js end end /views/comments/create.js.rjs page.insert_html :bottom, :commentwrapper, :partial => @comment page[@comment].visual_effect :highlight page[:new_comment].reset page.replace_html :notice, flash[:notice] flash.discard /views/comments/_comment.html.erb <% div_for comment do %> <div id="commentwrapper"> <% if admin? %> <%=link_to_remote "X", :url => [@project, comment], :method => :delete %> <% end %> <%= h(comment.body) %><br/><br/> Posted <%= time_ago_in_words(comment.created_at) %> ago by <%= h(comment.name) %> <% if admin? %> | <%= h(comment.email) %> <% end %></div> <% end %>

    Read the article

  • Ajax page.replace_html problems with partials in Rails

    - by Chris Power
    Hello, I am having a problem with a pretty simple AJAX call in rails. I have a blog-style application and each post has a "like" feature. I want to be able to increment the "like" on each post in the index using AJAX onclick. I got it to work; however, the DOM is a bit tricky here, because no matter what partial its looking at, it will only update the TOP partial. so if I click "like" on post #2, it will update and replace the "likes" on post #1 instead. Code for _post partial: <some code here...> <div id="postcontent"> Posted <%= post.created_at.strftime("%A, %b %d")%> <br /> </div> <div id="postlikes"> <%= link_to_remote 'Like', :url => {:controller => 'posts', :action => 'like_post', :id => post.id}%> <%= post.like %> </div> code for _postlikes partial: <div id="postlikes"> <%= link_to_remote 'Like', :url => {:controller => 'posts', :action => 'like_post', :id => @post.id}%> <%= @post.like %> </div> </div> like_post.rjs code: page.replace_html "postlikes", :partial => "postlikes", :object => @post page.visual_effect :highlight, "postlikes", :duration => 3 So this all works properly for the first "postcontent" div. But this is an index of posts, so if I wanted to updated the second "postcontent" div on the page, it will still replace the html of the first. I understand the problem, I just don't know how to fix it :) Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Rails controller not rendering correct view when form is force-submitted by Javascript

    - by whazzmaster
    I'm using Rails with jQuery, and I'm working on a page for a simple site that prints each record to a table. The only editable field for each record is a checkbox. My goal is that every time a checkbox is changed, an ajax request updates that boolean attribute for the record (i.e., no submit button). My view code: <td> <% form_remote_tag :url => admin_update_path, :html => { :id => "form#{lead.id}" } do %> <%= hidden_field :lead, :id, :value => lead.id %> <%= check_box :lead, :contacted, :id => "checkbox"+lead.id.to_s, :checked => lead.contacted, :onchange => "$('#form#{lead.id}').submit();" %> <% end %> </td> In my routes.rb, admin_update_path is defined by map.admin_update 'update', :controller => "admin", :action => "update", :method => :post I also have an RJS template to render back an update. The contents of this file is currently just for testing (I just wanted to see if it worked, this will not be the ultimate functionality on a successful save)... page << "$('#checkbox#{@lead.id}').hide();" When clicked, the ajax request is successfully sent, with the correct params, and the action on the controller can retrieve the record and update it just fine. The problem is that it doesn't send back the JS; it changes the page in the browser and renders the generated Javascript as plain text rather than executing it in-place. Rails does some behind-the-scenes stuff to figure out if the incoming request is an ajax call, and I can't figure out why it's interpreting the incoming request as a regular web request as opposed to an ajax request. I may be missing something extremely simple here, but I've kind-of burned myself out looking so I thought I'd ask for another pair of eyes. Thanks in advance for any info!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3