Search Results

Search found 29591 results on 1184 pages for 'psd into html'.

Page 305/1184 | < Previous Page | 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312  | Next Page >

  • jQuer image hover animate

    - by Ryan Max
    Hello. I have the following jQuery script that makes an orange transparent hover effect cover the image when it's rolled over. How do I make it so this script will animate in and out (with a fade?) $(document).ready(function() { $('#gallery a').bind('mouseover', function(){ $(this).parent('li').css({position:'relative'}); var img = $(this).children('img'); $('<div />').text(' ').css({ 'height': img.height(), 'width': img.width(), 'background-color': 'orange', 'position': 'absolute', 'top': 0, 'left': 0, 'opacity': 0.5 }).bind('mouseout', function(){ $(this).remove(); }).insertAfter(this); }); });

    Read the article

  • Add function to existing JQuery plugin

    - by kralco626
    Is it possible to add a function to a plugin without modifying the actual plugin? Can I do something like this in my site's js file? $.fn.Watermark.Refresh = function() { $.Watermark.HideAll(); $.Watermark.ShowAll(); } or (function($){ $.fn.Watermark.Refresh = function() { $.Watermark.HideAll(); $.Watermark.ShowAll(); }; })(jQuery); neither worked, the first says $ is undefined, the second that jQuery is undefined... ideas? Solution: Either method works, just include the jquery file before the site js file.

    Read the article

  • Hiding Text in ie7

    - by user356849
    So I have this text generated by a javascript plugin. <a class="className">Text</a> a.className { background: url(images/a-image.png) no-repeat; } But the "Text" shows on top of the image... Now... with any respectable web browser, I can use color: rgba(0,0,0,0); to solve the problem, but IE7 doesn't obey standards of any sort. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • how to replace ie error

    - by Jeny
    Hi friends, document.getElementId(id).style.display ='table-cell'. this gives error message in ie, this is ie bug or any other solutions please give any other solutions

    Read the article

  • CSS Differences Between IE and FF

    - by Joe Majewski
    I hope I'm not breaking any rules by asking a question that pertains to a project I'm working on. If you view my page here and view it in Firefox and again in Internet Explorer, the width of the main content boxes differs. In Firefox, everything aligns perfectly with the advertisement at the top of the page, but in IE, the width of the content boxes seems to fall short by about 20 or so pixels. My question is obvious by now, but what is causing the width in IE to fall short, and what would a simple solution be? If I happen to be breaking the rules by asking a question that is not generic enough to benefit others, then allow me to rephrase it; what would be the best approach to solving visual differences between browsers? Should I use a separate CSS file for IE, or is there a way to define lines in my CSS file that only get rendered by a specific browser? It would be best if someone could provide me with the necessary CSS to align things properly, but I would be more than happy to learn about how to make the CSS dynamic (if that's possible). Thanks everyone. :)

    Read the article

  • Get Mail with PHP and IMAP in Gmail just loading

    - by Oscar Godson
    I'm not sure why. Ive tried a bunch of different code. Wrote it myself, and copied other people's tutorials but every bit of code it's loading forever and eventually stops due to script processing times on the server. Does anyone know why? Oh, and IMAP is turned on, i get IMAP / Exchange on my iPhone from this same account fine. And IMAP is turned on in my version of PHP (checked with phpinfo they all say enabled.) <?php /* connect to gmail */ $hostname = '{imap.gmail.com:993/imap/ssl}INBOX'; $username = '[email protected]'; $password = 'xxxxxx'; /* try to connect */ $inbox = imap_open($hostname,$username,$password) or die('Cannot connect to Gmail: ' . imap_last_error()); /* grab emails */ $emails = imap_search($inbox,'ALL'); /* if emails are returned, cycle through each... */ if($emails) { /* begin output var */ $output = ''; /* put the newest emails on top */ rsort($emails); /* for every email... */ foreach($emails as $email_number) { /* get information specific to this email */ $overview = imap_fetch_overview($inbox,$email_number,0); $message = imap_fetchbody($inbox,$email_number,2); /* output the email header information */ $output.= '<div class="toggler '.($overview[0]->seen ? 'read' : 'unread').'">'; $output.= '<span class="subject">'.$overview[0]->subject.'</span> '; $output.= '<span class="from">'.$overview[0]->from.'</span>'; $output.= '<span class="date">on '.$overview[0]->date.'</span>'; $output.= '</div>'; /* output the email body */ $output.= '<div class="body">'.$message.'</div>'; } echo $output; } /* close the connection */ imap_close($inbox); ?

    Read the article

  • How can I merge CSS definitions in files into inline style attributes, using Perl?

    - by mintywalker
    Many email clients don't like linked CSS stylesheets, or even the embedded <style> tag, but rather want the CSS to appear inline as style attributes on all your markup. BAD: <link rel=stylesheet type="text/css" href="/style.css"> BAD: <style type="text/css">...</style> WORKS: <h1 style="margin: 0">...</h1> However this inline style attribute approach is a right pain to manage. I've found tools for Ruby and PHP that will take a CSS file and some separate markup as input and return you the merged result - a single file of markup with all the CSS converted to style attributes. I'm looking for a Perl solution to this problem, but I've not found one on CPAN or by searching Google. Any pointers? Alternatively, are there CPAN modules one could combine to achieve the same result? Ruby http://code.dunae.ca/premailer.web/ PHP http://www.pelagodesign.com/sidecar/emogrifier/ Perl ?

    Read the article

  • embed tag for flash and w3c

    - by drav
    when validating a site using w3c validator it tells me the tag is not valid markup. So i take it out and it works on safari/chrome but not firefox(3.5.x) but validates fine. Is there something in the tag i must add in order for firefox to display flash.

    Read the article

  • Why does this work in Firefox but not IE and how can I fix it?

    - by bstullkid
    I want to show and hide rows of a table based on the value of a select box and this works in Firefox but not IE: <select onChange="javascript: toggle(this.value);"> <option value="cat0">category 0</option> <option value="cat1">category 1</option> </select> <table> <tr name="cat0"> <td>some stuff v</td> <td>some stuff v</td> </tr> <tr name="cat0"> <td>some stuff d</td> <td>some stuff d</td> </tr> <tr name="cat1"> <td>some stuff a</td> <td>some stuff a</td> </tr> <tr name="cat1"> <td>some stuff b</td> <td>some stuff b</td> </tr> </table> <script type="text/javascript"> function toggle(category) { // turn everything off for (var i = 0; i < 2; i++) { var cat = document.getElementsByName('cat' + i); for (var j = 0; j < cat.length; j++) cat[j].style.display = 'none'; } // turn on category chosen var cat = document.getElementsByName(category); for (var i = 0; i < cat.length; i++) cat[i].style.display = ''; } // start by showing cat0 toggle('cat0'); </script>

    Read the article

  • Ordered List (ol) showing up un-numbered?

    - by Abs
    Hello all, I have an ordered list (ol) on my page but the numbering is not showing up at all! I have done this: <ol> <li>my text</li> <li>my text</li> <li>my text</li> </ol> As I have typed the above, stackoverflow was able to render it correctly the way I wanted it to, like so: my text my text my text However, this is not happening on my webpage. I am viewing this in Firefox on my localhost. If any knows why my ol's look like ul's (i.e. no numbering) I would be grateful for help. If not, please let me know how I can achieve a numbered list using ul's. Thanks all

    Read the article

  • Dropdownlist width in IE

    - by NimsDotNet
    In IE, the dropdown-list takes the same width as the dropbox (i hope i am making sense) whereas in Firefox the dropdown-list's width varies according to the content. This basically means that i have to make sure that the dropbox has to be wide enough to display the longest selection possible. this makes my page look very ugly :( Is there any workaround for this problem? How can i uses CSS to set different widths for dropbox and the dropdownlist?

    Read the article

  • Help passing _POST Form Data PHP

    - by Mikey1980
    I apologize in advance, I am a PHP noob! I have form with some hidden fields. I need the values to POST to "submit_rma.php" so that they're not missing from the db--I need $qty, $estmate_id and $rma_type. The rest of the fields are just displaying data for the user and are readonly. Currently I only get value from the qty text field. Is there any easier way to pass these values? URL is out of the question due to security issues. <form method="post" action="submit_rma.php";> <table> <tr> <td> Quantity </td> <td> <input type="text" name="qty" value="<?php echo $qty ?>" size="1"/><br/> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Part # </td> <td> <input type="text" name="" value="<?php echo $model ?>" size="8" READONLY/><br/> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Description </td> <td> <input type="text" name="" value="<?php echo $name_EN ?>" size="50" READONLY/><br/> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Paid Date </td> <td> <input type="text" name="" value="<?php echo $sold_date ?>" size="6" READONLY/><br/> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Amount Each </td> <td> <input type="text" name="" value="<?php echo $dealer_price ?>" size="8" READONLY/> </td> </tr> </table> <input type="hidden" name="estmate_id" value="<?php echo $estmate_id ?>"> <input type="hidden" name="rma_type" value="Short Shipped"> <input type="submit" name="submit";"> </form>

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to use JavaScript to submit an unnamed form from outside an iFrame?

    - by Scott
    I know that may sound silly, but I'm trying to submit a form on a page inside an iFrame, from the parent site. Here's an example of the form: <form action="/add_email" method="post"> <div class="field"> <label for="newEmailAddress" style="width: auto">Add new email address</label> <input type="text" id="newEmailAddress" name="email" value="null" class="text-field" /> <input type="hidden" name="__app_key" value="null"/> <input type="submit" value="Add address and send activation email"> </div> </form> As you can see, the Submit button, and the form itself both lack a proper name or id, this is not something I have control over. (It's on an external website.) Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Use JS to add characters into textfield

    - by Thomas
    I want to add a $ symbol before a users entry into a text field without actually submitting the $ when the user clicks submit. Additionally, I need to prohibit the user from entering anything but numerical values in to the text input. I know about the JQuery input mask (http://www.conetrees.com/2009/03/blog/jquery-masked-input-plugin-increase-usability-for-masked-format-input-fields) but this plugin requires you to set the exact number of digits/letters that the user is supposed to enter, which is no good for my current project. Can anyone think of a way to accomplish what I have described above?

    Read the article

  • Why pseudo-elements :before and :after appear in front of my DIV element and not behind?

    - by Dim13i
    I have a DIV element with this given class: .slideshow { background: white; width: 700px; height: 300px; padding:10px; margin: 0 auto; position: relative; box-shadow: 0px 0px 5px grey, 0px 10px 20px rgba(0,0,0,.1) inset; } I define those two pseudo-elements (:before and :after): .slideshow:before, .slideshow:after { content: " "; background: green; width: 50%; height: 50%; position: absolute; z-index: -10; } My problem is that those two pseudo-elements appear in front of my DIV and not behind. Is there any specific reason for this behaviour? Here is an example: EXAMPLE The Javascript part is a bit messy but i'm still working on it. Also I've noticed that if I delete all the JS part I don't have anymore this problem, but I don't think there is anything in the code that should modify the slideshow DIV SOLVED: The problem is in the javascript part where I have: $('.slideshow').css('-webkit-transform', 'rotate(0deg)'); Removing this line solved the problem. I guess that pseudo-elements :before and :after are not compatible with the property transform.

    Read the article

  • How to make Chrome obey this rule?

    - by George Edison
    Here is the code: <table style='margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: right;'> <tr> <td style='vertical-align: top;'>Title:</td> <td style='width: 400px;'><input type='text' style='border: 1px solid black; width: 100%;' /> </tr> <tr> <td style='vertical-align: top;'>Content:</td> <td><textarea style='border: 1px solid black; width: 100%;' rows='7'></textarea></td> </tr> </table> Here is what it looks like in Opera and FireFox (in Linux): But then in Chrome (also in Linux): As you can see, the first text box is not the right width :( How can I fix this?

    Read the article

  • Putting links into text in Django

    - by Dane Larsen
    I have a notifications app that generates notifications for users. The notification class has to be really general, because notifications are generated by all sorts of different things. My question is this: How do I insert links into the text of the notifications? What I tried was this: note = Notification(..., notification="""%s %s has accepted the task: <a href="/tasks/%d/">%s</a>.""" % (request.user.first_name, request.user.last_name, task.id, task.name), ...) In retrospect, it's obvious this wouldn't work. How should I go about this? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to position an element relative to the border-box of its parent?

    - by Timwi
    Consider the following jsfiddle for reference: http://jsfiddle.net/apmmw2ma/ As you can see, the “inner” box (with the red border) is positioned relative to the outer’s padding-box: left:0 positions it just to the right of outer’s border, and top:100% appears to mean “100% of the content plus padding, but not the border”. Unfortunately, adding box-sizing: border-box to the outer div seems to have no effect. I want to position a child element directly below its parent’s border-box, i.e. the two borders should abut no matter how thick they are. Is this possible?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312  | Next Page >