Search Results

Search found 17310 results on 693 pages for 'target action'.

Page 31/693 | < Previous Page | 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38  | Next Page >

  • T4MVC adding current page controller to action link

    - by Mike Flynn
    I have the following ActionLink that sits in the home page on the register controller (Index.cshtml) @Html.ActionLink("terms of service", Url.Action(MVC.Home.Terms()), null, new { target="_blank" }) Generating the following URL. Why is "register" being added to it? It's as if the link within the Register page which has it's own controller is preappending the register controller to any link in that view? http://localhost/register/terms-of-service routes.MapRoute( "Terms", "terms-of-service", new { controller = "Home", action = "Terms" } ); public partial class HomeController : SiteController { public virtual ActionResult Terms() { return View(new SiteViewModel()); }

    Read the article

  • Invoke an action that is using ASP.NET MVC [Authorize] from outside the application

    - by Nate Bross
    Is this possible? I'd like to expose a URL (action) such as http://mysever/myapp/UpdateHeartbeat/. In my MVC application it looks like [Authorize] [AcceptsVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] public ActionResult UpdateHeartbeat() { // update date in DB to DateTime.Now } Now, in my MVC application the user has logged in via FORMS authentication and they can execute that action to their hearts content. What I want to do, is hit that URL progromatically (as part of an API that I wouldl like to build) -- is there a way I can do that without removing the [Authorize] attribute and adding username/password as parameters to the POST?

    Read the article

  • Using an extended interceptor in struts2 does not work w/ action parameters

    - by Ricardo
    I have a default package w/ an interceptor configure, and i'm extending that package into another one and calling the same interceptor <action name="availability**"> <param name="subTab">availability</param> <interceptor-ref name="tabStack"/> <result>/WEB-INF/jsp/index.jsp?include=visibilit/availability.jsp</result> </action> The problem is that the param is not being read inside my interceptor code: Map params = invocation.getInvocationContext().getParameters(); subTab = params.get("subTab").toString(); //NULL exception Any idea how i can pass parameters to extended interceptors? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Aop, Unity, Interceptors and ASP.NET MVC Controller Action Methods

    - by Richard Ev
    Using log4net we would like to log all calls to our ASP.NET MVC controller action methods. The logs should include information about any parameters that were passed to the controller. Rather than hand-coding this in each action method we hope to use an AoP approach with Interceptors via Unity. We already have this working with some other classes that use interfaces (using the InterfaceInterceptor). However, we're not sure how to proceed with our controllers. Should we re-work them slightly to use an interface, or is there a simpler approach? Edit The VirtualMethodInterceptor seems to be the correct approach, however using this results in the following exception: System.ArgumentNullException: Value cannot be null. Parameter name: str at System.Reflection.Emit.DynamicILGenerator.Emit(OpCode opcode, String str) at Microsoft.Practices.ObjectBuilder2.DynamicMethodConstructorStrategy.PreBuildUp(IBuilderContext context) at Microsoft.Practices.ObjectBuilder2.StrategyChain.ExecuteBuildUp(IBuilderContext context)

    Read the article

  • Swing- focus problem

    - by AlonaK
    Hi, In my application I have a frame, with toolbar (the toolbar contains some actions). I want the toolbar to be visible only when the window is focused. So, I registered a windowFocusListener on the window. The problem is- when the window is not focused and I click on the place where a tool bar action should be- the action is performed. This happens because the WindowFocusGained is called before the mouse button is released and when the mouse button released it calls the actionPerformed. Does anybody has any idea for a work around for this problem? Does anybody know how to determine wether the mouse button is clicked now?

    Read the article

  • Zend Framework Router Getting /module/VALUE/controller/action

    - by cappuccino
    I've been googling around and I can't seem to find anything which explains the use of ZF router well. I've read the documentation on the site, which seems to only talk about re-routing. I am trying to make the format: /module/value/controller/action give /module/controller/action passing on value as a parameter e.g. /store/johnsmithbigsale/home/newstuff would route to /store/home/newstuff passing on johnsmithbigsale as the value to a parameter with a hidden namespace e.g. storeName. Some help would be greatful!

    Read the article

  • WIX: Using a temporary file during install

    - by madbadger
    Hello! I am writing a WIX installer and I have a following requirement: During installation, I need to pass an absolute path to a file (lets call it A) included in my installer to a COM component, which already exists on the hard drive and is a part of another program. I have already written an appropriate Custom Action which expects a path to the file A. I don't want to include A as a file installed in the Program Files folder and removed during the uninstallation process. Instead, I would like to put A only temporary on the hard drive, call my Custom Action which will cause the COM component to use the content of A, and then remove A from disk. Is there an easy way to accomplish this goal? I have tried to utilize the Binary Table and store A there, however I don't know how to reference A using absolute path. I know I could put A outside of MSI file but I would like to keep every file installer needs in a single MSI. Any help would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Change Makefile variable value

    - by paulgray
    Is there a way to reassign Makefile variable value inside of the target body? What I am trying to do is to add some extra flags for debug compilation: %.erl: %.beam $(ERLC) $(ERLFLAGS) -o ebin $< test: clean debug_compile_flag compile compile_test debug_compile: $(ERLCFLAGS) += -DTEST So if I invoke test target I would like to clean up my environment, add some new flags (like -DTEST to the existing ones), compile the whole code once again (first sources, then test modules). I do not want to copy/paste the code for compiling with some new flags set since there is a lot of logic put here and there. Is there some easy way to redefine the variable value so I can reuse the existing code?

    Read the article

  • T-SQL MERGE - finding out which action it took

    - by IanC
    I need to know if a MERGE statement performed an INSERT. In my scenario, the insert is either 0 or 1 rows. Test code: DECLARE @t table (C1 int, C2 int) DECLARE @C1 INT, @C2 INT set @c1 = 1 set @c2 = 1 MERGE @t as tgt USING (SELECT @C1, @C2) AS src (C1, C2) ON (tgt.C1 = src.C1) WHEN MATCHED AND tgt.C2 != src.C2 THEN UPDATE SET tgt.C2 = src.C2 WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET THEN INSERT VALUES (src.C1, src. C2) OUTPUT deleted.*, $action, inserted.*; SELECT inserted.* The last line doesn't compile (no scope, unlike a trigger). I can't get access to @action, or the output. Actually, I don't want any output meta data. How can I do this?

    Read the article

  • action method is not called in JSF

    - by gurupriyan.e
    This is my Phase Listener public class AdminPhaseListener implements PhaseListener { private static final long serialVersionUID = -1161541721597667238L; public void afterPhase(PhaseEvent e) { System.out.println("after Phase " + e.getPhaseId()); } public void beforePhase(PhaseEvent e) { System.out.println("before Phase " + e.getPhaseId()); if(e.getPhaseId()== PhaseId.RESTORE_VIEW) { } } public PhaseId getPhaseId() { return PhaseId.ANY_PHASE; }} On click of a Command Button in my page, i call an action method and do some processing but the action method is not called at all, but in the server log , i could see the messages printed by my PhaseListener for all the Phases. If my view was not changed, It would have stopped after the RESTORE_VIEW Phase right? any thoughts?

    Read the article

  • Page doesn't post to the given URL

    - by Sri Kumar
    Hello All, I have the following HTML content. When i click the button, the page doesn't post to URL provided in action tag. The corresponding application is running, but still the page load of the CrossPage.aspx was not invoked. What could be the problem? <body> <form id="UploadForm" method="post" enctype="multipart/form-data" action="http://localhost:2518/Web/CrossPage.aspx"> <div> <input type="file" id="BtnUpload" /> <input type="button" id="BtnSubmit" value="Submit" /> </div> </form> </body>

    Read the article

  • Rendering another Action without changing URL?

    - by Michael Stum
    I have this code in my Rails 3 controller: def index now = Time.now.utc.strftime("%m%d") redirect_to :action => "show", :id => now end def show begin @date = Time.parse("12#{params[:id]}") dbdate = params[:id] rescue ArgumentError @date = Time.now.utc dbdate = @date.strftime("%m%d") end @date = @date.strftime("%B %d") @events = Event.events_for_date(dbdate) end So basically index is just a specialized version of show, hence I want it to execute show, render the show.html.erb view - but I do not want to change the URL like redirect_to does. I have tried this approach: def index now = Time.now.utc.strftime("%m%d") params[:id] = now show render :action => "show" end Now, this works, but it just smells badly. I'm new to Ruby and Rails, so I just wonder if there is something fundamentally wrong or if there is a better way to do this?

    Read the article

  • Remove Action Bar icon but keep the UP button

    - by Gaurav
    I am developing an application which runs on both honeycomb and ice cream sandwich. I want my action bar not to have the icon but keep the "up/home" button. I used: getActionBar().setDisplayOptions(0, ActionBar.DISPLAY_SHOW_HOME); This removes the action bar icon but keeps the "up" button on ice cream sandwich. But on honeycomb, it removes the "up" button as well. Is there a way on honeycomb that allows me to keep the "up" button but get rid of the icon?

    Read the article

  • How to get MVC action to return 404

    - by zaph0d
    I have an action that takes in a string that is used to retrieve some data. If this string results in no data being returned (maybe because it has been deleted), I want to return a 404 and display an error page. I currently just use return a special view that display a friendly error message specific to this action saying that the item was not found. This works fine, but would ideally like to return a 404 status code so search engines know that this content no longer exists and can remove it from the search results. What is the best way to go about this? Is it as simple as setting Response.StatusCode = 404?

    Read the article

  • Change column names of a cube action as they appear in Visual Studio

    - by hermann
    the title pretty much says it all. I have a cube with data in it and I have yet to find a way to change the column names. They appear in a very ugly manner like [cubeName].[$dimension.columnName]. I have tried everything I know and anything I found on the web but nothing seems to be working. What I tried to do in most cases is create an Action in the Actions tab and write some MDX query language in there. No results whatsoever. As if the action is never run. Does anyone know how to do this? I've spent about 3 days trying to figure this out. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Entity update from ASP.NET MVC page with post to Edit action

    - by mare
    I have a form that posts back to /Edit/ and my action in controller looks like this: // // POST: /Client/Edit [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] public ActionResult Edit(Client client) My form includes a subset of Client entity properties and I also include a hidden field that holds an ID of the client. The client entity itself is provided via the GET Edit action. Now I want to do entity update but so far I've only been trying without first loading the entity from the DB. Because the client object that comes in POST Edit has everything it needs. I want to update just those properties on the entity in datastore. So far I've tried with Context.Refresh() and AttachTo() but with no success - I'm getting all sorts of exceptions. I inspected the entity object as it comes from the web form and it looks fine (it does have an ID and entered data) mapped just fine. If I do it with Context.SaveChanges() then it just inserts new row..

    Read the article

  • No method error in controller create action

    - by user2799827
    I have read a number of Q&As on SO in search of some help on this but have so far not solved my issue. I am trying to teach myself ruby/rails, and as a test project, I want to create a list of tvshows and a list of characters where each tvshow has_many characters and each character belongs_to a specific show. I am sure I am doing something basic incorrectly. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. here is the characters controller: class CharactersController < ApplicationController before_action :set_character, only: [:show, :edit, :update, :destroy] # GET /characters # GET /characters.json def index @characters = Character.all end # GET /characters/1 # GET /characters/1.json def show end # GET /characters/new def new @character = Character.new end # GET /characters/1/edit def edit end # POST /characters # POST /characters.json def create @character = @tvshow.characters.create(params[:character]) respond_to do |format| if @character.save format.html { redirect_to @character, notice: 'Character was successfully created.' } format.json { render action: 'show', status: :created, location: @character } else format.html { render action: 'new' } format.json { render json: @character.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity } end end end # PATCH/PUT /characters/1 # PATCH/PUT /characters/1.json def update respond_to do |format| if @character.update(character_params) format.html { redirect_to @character, notice: 'Character was successfully updated.' } format.json { head :no_content } else format.html { render action: 'edit' } format.json { render json: @character.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity } end end end # DELETE /characters/1 # DELETE /characters/1.json def destroy @character.destroy respond_to do |format| format.html { redirect_to characters_url } format.json { head :no_content } end end private # Use callbacks to share common setup or constraints between actions. def set_character @character = Character.find(params[:id]) end # Never trust parameters from the scary internet, only allow the white list through. def character_params params.require(:character).permit(:first_name, :last_name, :bio) end end character model: class Character < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :tvshow default_scope -> { order('created_at DESC') } validates :tvshow_id, presence: true end tvshow model: class Tvshow < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :characters, dependent: :destroy end error gets returned when I attempt to create a character. here is the full trace: app/controllers/characters_controller.rb:27:in `create' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal/implicit_render.rb:4:in `send_action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/abstract_controller/base.rb:189:in `process_action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal/rendering.rb:10:in `process_action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/abstract_controller/callbacks.rb:18:in `block in process_action' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:413:in `_run__1211653665462320621__process_action__callbacks' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:80:in `run_callbacks' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/abstract_controller/callbacks.rb:17:in `process_action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal/rescue.rb:29:in `process_action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal/instrumentation.rb:31:in `block in process_action' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/notifications.rb:159:in `block in instrument' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/notifications/instrumenter.rb:20:in `instrument' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/notifications.rb:159:in `instrument' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal/instrumentation.rb:30:in `process_action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal/params_wrapper.rb:245:in `process_action' activerecord (4.0.0) lib/active_record/railties/controller_runtime.rb:18:in `process_action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/abstract_controller/base.rb:136:in `process' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/abstract_controller/rendering.rb:44:in `process' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal.rb:195:in `dispatch' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal/rack_delegation.rb:13:in `dispatch' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_controller/metal.rb:231:in `block in action' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:80:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:80:in `dispatch' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:48:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/journey/router.rb:71:in `block in call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/journey/router.rb:59:in `each' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/journey/router.rb:59:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:655:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/etag.rb:23:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/conditionalget.rb:35:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/head.rb:11:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/params_parser.rb:27:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/flash.rb:241:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/session/abstract/id.rb:225:in `context' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/session/abstract/id.rb:220:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/cookies.rb:486:in `call' activerecord (4.0.0) lib/active_record/query_cache.rb:36:in `call' activerecord (4.0.0) lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:626:in `call' activerecord (4.0.0) lib/active_record/migration.rb:369:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/callbacks.rb:29:in `block in call' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:373:in `_run__2792846465963916895__call__callbacks' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:80:in `run_callbacks' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/callbacks.rb:27:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/reloader.rb:64:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/remote_ip.rb:76:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/debug_exceptions.rb:17:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/show_exceptions.rb:30:in `call' railties (4.0.0) lib/rails/rack/logger.rb:38:in `call_app' railties (4.0.0) lib/rails/rack/logger.rb:21:in `block in call' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/tagged_logging.rb:67:in `block in tagged' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/tagged_logging.rb:25:in `tagged' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/tagged_logging.rb:67:in `tagged' railties (4.0.0) lib/rails/rack/logger.rb:21:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/request_id.rb:21:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/methodoverride.rb:21:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/runtime.rb:17:in `call' activesupport (4.0.0) lib/active_support/cache/strategy/local_cache.rb:83:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/lock.rb:17:in `call' actionpack (4.0.0) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/static.rb:64:in `call' railties (4.0.0) lib/rails/engine.rb:511:in `call' railties (4.0.0) lib/rails/application.rb:97:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/lock.rb:17:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/content_length.rb:14:in `call' rack (1.5.2) lib/rack/handler/webrick.rb:60:in `service' /Users/dariusgoore/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/httpserver.rb:138:in `service' /Users/dariusgoore/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/httpserver.rb:94:in `run' /Users/dariusgoore/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/server.rb:191:in `block in start_thread'

    Read the article

  • What happens when I release a upgrade with higher targeted sdk as previous version?

    - by Peterdk
    SoundPool has a serious bug in it in Android 1.5. I fixed it with a workaround, but since it really limits my app, I want to target 1.6+ for the next version of it. I am wondering: What happens when I release a upgrade that has a higher target SDK version then the previous version of my app? Will only 1.6+ users be able to upgrade their app? Or will also the 1.5 users be able to upgrade since they have the program already installed? Anybody experience with this?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38  | Next Page >