Search Results

Search found 10366 results on 415 pages for 'const char pointer'.

Page 315/415 | < Previous Page | 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322  | Next Page >

• C++ syntax of constructors " 'Object1 a (1, Object1(2))''

  - by osgx

  Hello I have a such syntax in program class Object1 : BaseClass { BaseClass *link; int i; public: Object1(int a){i=a;} Object1(int a, Object1 /*place1*/ o) {i=a; link= &o;} }; int main(){ Object1 a(1, /*place2*/ Object1(2)); ... } What do I need in place1? I want to save a link (pointer) to the second object in the first object. Should I use in place1 reference "&"? What type will have "Object1(2)" in place2? Is it a constructor of the anonymous object? Will it have a "auto" storage type?

  Read the article

• C++ function call routes resolver

  - by Poni

  Hi! I'm looking for a tool that will tell/resolve for every function all the call paths (call it "routes") to it. For example: void deeper(int *pNumber) { *pNumber++; } void gateA(int *pNumber) { deeper(pNumber); } void gateB(int *pNumber) { gateA(pNumber); } void main() { int x = 123; gateA(&x); gateB(&x); } See? I need a tool that will tell me all the routes to deeper(), and more if possible. By saying "more" I mean that it will tell me if the pointer is the same as been provided to the calling function. This will greatly save me time. Thanks!

  Read the article

• [C++] Simple inheritance question

  - by xbonez

  I was going over some sample questions for an upcoming test, and this question is totally confusing me. Any help would be appreciated. Consider the following code: class GraduateStudent : public Student { ... }; If the word "public" is omitted, GraduateStudent uses private inheritance, which means which of the following? GraduateStudent objects may not use methods of Student. GraduateStudent does not have access to private objects of Student. No method of GraduateStudent may call a method of Student. Only const methods of GraduateStudent can call methods of Student.

  Read the article

• freeing malloc and checkin it is empty or not

  - by gcc

  char *p; p="kjkjk"; . .//there are codes which are checking another command . if(.....)//i used pointer p in only that area free(p); . . //there are codes which are checking another command . if(p==NULL) //i check whether is empty .... if(p==-1) //can we use "EOF==p " in if statement ... //are there any usage like that EOF==p else .... I think there is big error , but where?

  Read the article

• When should we use * and & and . and -> ?

  - by uzay95

  Why we are using * character when we are creating button but we aren't adding it to app instance? #include <QApplication> #include <QPushButton> int main(int argc,char *argv[]) { QApplication app(argc,argv); QPushButton *button = new QPushButton("Button Text"); QObject::connect(button,SIGNAL(clicked()),&app,SLOT(quit())); button->show(); return app.exec(); } When should we use * and & and . and - ?

  Read the article

• I make this for balancing paranthesis of equation but i think it is wrong check and correct it

  - by muhammadlodhi

  int main(){ char i,input[30],close,open; for(i=0;i<='.';i++){ printf("enter equation"); scanf("%c",input[i]); if(input[i]=='(') input++; input[i]=open; else if(input[i]==')') input[i]--; input[i]=close; else if(open[i]==close[i]) { printf("paranthesis are balance"); } else printf("paranthesis are not balance"); } getch(); return 0; }

  Read the article

• Array-size macro that rejects pointers

  - by nneonneo

  The standard array-size macro that is often taught is #define ARRAYSIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0])) or some equivalent formation. However, this kind of thing silently succeeds when a pointer is passed in, and gives results that can seem plausible at runtime until things mysteriously fall apart. It's all-too-easy to make this mistake: a function that has a local array variable is refactored, moving a bit of array manipulation into a new function called with the array as a parameter. So, the question is: is there a "sanitary" macro to detect misuse of the ARRAYSIZE macro in C, preferably at compile-time? In C++ we'd just use a template specialized for array arguments only; in C, it seems we'll need some way to distinguish arrays and pointers. (If I wanted to reject arrays, for instance, I'd just do e.g. (arr=arr, ...) because array assignment is illegal).

  Read the article

• C++ operator[] syntax.

  - by Lanissum

  Just a quick syntax question. I'm writing a map class (for school). If I define the following operator overload: template<typename Key, typename Val> class Map {... Val* operator[](Key k); What happens when a user writes: Map<int,int> myMap; map[10] = 3; Doing something like that will only overwrite a temporary copy of the [null] pointer at Key k. Is it even possible to do: map[10] = 3; printf("%i\n", map[10]); with the same operator overload?

  Read the article

• Can I reproduce Scala's behavior for == ?

  - by JPP

  In Programming in Scala, I can read that the == operator behaves as if it was defined like this: final def == (that: Any): Boolean = if (null eq this) {null eq that} else {this equals that} But there must actually be compiler magic to avoid null pointer exceptions, right? Is there any way for me to replicate this behavior with pure Scala; i.e., have an operator/method return one thing if the receiver is null and another one if it isn't? What I mean is an actual implementation of null eq this. I suppose I can write a "pimp" and then define the method on the wrapper class, but is there a more direct way to do this?

  Read the article

• Help with implementing a function to change size of dynamic array

  - by iRobot

  I'm trying to write a function that will change the size of a dynamic array to a new size. In my header file, I have: Image **images; //pointer to a dynamic array of image pointers int maximum; //size I want to do this by allocating a new array and copying the values over without changing their indices. If there are non-null pointers outside the range newmax, then we cant do this. So heres what I have: There are no compilation or runtime errors. However, I find that the new array isnt getting sized right. When I run the following test case: I should get an index out of bounds error, but instead the system lets it slide. Can anyone see the mistake? I've looked for hours but cant find anything.

  Read the article

• Strange macro declaration in C

  - by Andrey Atapin

  Exploring libusb-1.0.9 source code, I have found such line (./os/poll_windows.c:78): #define CHECK_INIT_POLLING do {if(!is_polling_set) init_polling();} while(0) As for me this is the same like: #define CHECK_INIT_POLLING if(!is_polling_set) init_polling(); Is there any reason to loop that expression? UPDATE: I couldn't still realize what'd be wrong after the answers, and the following example helped: #include <stdio.h> #define TEST if(test) foo(); #define TEST_DO do { if(test) foo(); } while(0) int test = 1; void foo() { printf("%s", "Foo called"); } int main(int argc, char** argv) { if(argc > 1) TEST_DO; /* LINE 12 */ else printf("%s", "skipping..."); return 0; } If you put TEST at line 12, a compiler will give an error "error: ‘else’ without a previous ‘if’". Hope, this will help someone.

  Read the article

• c++ - FIFO implementation

  - by Narek

  While implementing a FIFO I have used the following structure: struct Node { T info_; Node* link_; Node(T info, Node* link=0): info_(info), link_(link) {} }; I think this a well known trick for lots of STL containers (for example for List). Is this a good practice? What it means for compiler when you say that Node has a member with a type of it's pointer? Is this a kind of infinite loop? And finally, if this is a bad practice, how I could implement a better FIFO.

  Read the article

• Why does the Win32-API have so many custom types?

  - by sub

  I'm new to the Win32 API and the many new types begin to confuse me. Some functions take 1-2 ints and 3 UINTS as arguments. Why can't they just use ints? What are UINTS? Then, there are those other types: DWORD LPCWSTR LPBOOL Again, I think the "primitive" C types would be enough - why introduce 100 new types? This one was a pain: WCHAR* I had to iterate through it and push_back every character to an std::string as there wasn't another way to convert it to one. Horrible. Why WCHAR? Why reinvent the wheel? They could have just used char* instead, or?

  Read the article

• question abouut string sort

  - by davit-datuashvili

  i have question from programming pearls problem is following show how to use lomuto's partitioning scheme to sort varying length bit strings in time proportional to the sum oof their length and algorithm is following each record in x[0..n-1] has an integer length and pointer to the array bit[0..length-1] code void bsort(l,u,depth){ if (l>=u) return; for (int i=l;i<u;i++) if (x[i].length<depth) swap(i,l++); m=l; if (x[i].bit[depth] ==0) swap(i,m++); bsort(l,m-1,depth+1); bsort(m,u,depth+1); please help me i need following things 1. how this algorith works 2.how implement in java?

  Read the article

• An array of structures in C...

  - by 00010000

  For the life of me I can't figure out the proper syntax for creating an array of structures in C. I tried this: struct foo { int x; int y; } foo[][] = { { { 1, 2 }, { 4, 5 }, { -1, -1 } }, { { 55, 44 } { 100, 200 }, } }; So for example foo[1][0].x == 100, foo[0][1].y == 5, etc. But GCC spits out a lot of errors. If anyone could provide the proper syntax that'd be great. EDIT: Okay, I tried this: struct foo { const char *x; int y; }; struct foo bar[2][] = { { { "A", 1 }, { "B", 2 }, { NULL, -1 }, }, { { "AA", 11 }, { "BB", 22 }, { NULL, -1 }, }, { { "ZZ", 11 }, { "YY", 22 }, { NULL, -1 }, }, { { "XX", 11 }, { "UU", 22 }, { NULL, -1 }, }, }; But GCC gives me "elements of array bar have incomplete type" and "excess elements in array initializer".

  Read the article

• .NET Regex - need matching string for parsing...

  - by TomTom

  Hello, I am a regex idiot and never found a good tutorial (links welcome, as well as a pointer to an interactive VS2010 integrated editor). I need to parse strings in the following form: [a/b]:c/d a, b: double with "." as possible separator. CAN be empty c: double with "." as separator d: integer, positive I.e. valid strings are: [/]:0.25/2 [-0.5/0.5]:0.05/2 [/0.1]:0.05/2 ;) Anyone can help? Thanks

  Read the article

• Method to register method to be called when event is raised

  - by zaidwaqi

  I have a Panel which contains 20 PictureBox controls. If a user clicks on any of the controls, I want a method within the Panel to be called. How do I do this? public class MyPanel : Panel { public MyPanel() { for(int i = 0; i < 20; i++) { Controls.Add(new PictureBox()); } } // DOESN'T WORK. // function to register functions to be called if the pictureboxes are clicked. public void RegisterFunction( <function pointer> func ) { foreach ( Control c in Controls ) { c.Click += new EventHandler( func ); } } } How do I implement RegisterFunction()? Also, if there are cool C# features that can make the code more elegant, please share.

  Read the article

• [VC++ 2010] Stack around the variable 'xyz' was corrupted.

  - by tirolerhut

  hi, I'm trying to get some simple piece of code I found on a website to work in VC++ 2010 on windows vista 64: #include "stdafx.h" #include <windows.h> int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { DWORD dResult; BOOL result; char oldWallPaper[MAX_PATH]; result = SystemParametersInfo(SPI_GETDESKWALLPAPER, sizeof(oldWallPaper)-1, oldWallPaper, 0); fprintf(stderr, "Current desktop background is %s\n", oldWallPaper); return 0; } it does compile, but when I run it, I always get this error: Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'oldWallPaper' was corrupted. I'm not sure what is going wrong, but I noticed, that the value of oldWallPaper looks something like "C\0\:\0\0U\0s\0e\0r\0s[...]" -- I'm wondering where all the \0s come from. A friend of mine compiled it on windows xp 32 (also VC++ 2010) and is able to run it without problems any clues/hints/opinions? thanks

  Read the article

• Button border radius and cursor

  - by noober

  CSS border radius does affect button rendering (I see it's round form), but does not affect how it interacts with the user (I still can click button outside its border). How should I fix it? I see the behavior in Chrome. button { cursor: pointer; outline: none; background-size: 100% 100%; background-color: red; /*transparent;*/ /* It's actually red and ROUND. */ background-position: center center; background-repeat: no-repeat; border: 0px; -webkit-border-top-left-radius: 73px; -webkit-border-top-right-radius: 73px; -webkit-border-bottom-left-radius: 73px; -webkit-border-bottom-right-radius: 73px; width: 146px; height: 146px; background-image: url('leftarrow.png'); } Regards,

  Read the article

• Initializing an array after declaration

  - by robUK

  Hello, gcc 4.4.3 c89 I have the following code as a sample of what I am trying to do. I don't know the actual size of the array, until I enter the function. However, I don't think I can set the array size after I have declared it. I need it global as some other functions will need to access the device names. Many thanks for any suggestions, /* global */ char *devices_names[]; void fill_devices(size_t num_devices) { devices_names[num_devices]; /* start filling */ }

  Read the article

• How does make_pair know the types of its args?

  - by bobobobo

  The definition for make_pair in the MSVC++ "utility" header is: template<class _Ty1, class _Ty2> inline pair<_Ty1, _Ty2> make_pair(_Ty1 _Val1, _Ty2 _Val2) { // return pair composed from arguments return (pair<_Ty1, _Ty2>(_Val1, _Val2)); } I use make_pair all the time though without putting the argument types in angle brackets: map<string,int> theMap ; theMap.insert( make_pair( "string", 5 ) ) ; Shouldn't I have to tell make_pair that the first argument is std::string and not char* ? How does it know?

  Read the article

• C++: Delete a struct?

  - by Rosarch

  I have a struct that contains pointers: struct foo { char* f; int* d; wchar* m; } I have a vector of shared pointers to these structs: vector<shared_ptr<foo>> vec; vec is allocated on the stack. When it passes out of scope at the end of the method, its destructor will be called. (Right?) That will in turn call the destructor of each element in the vector. (Right?) Does calling delete foo delete just the pointers such as foo.f, or does it actually free the memory from the heap?

  Read the article

• Read text and print each (byte) character in separate line

  - by user2967663

  preforming this code to read file and print each character \ (byte) in separate line works well with ASCII void preprocess_file (FILE *fp) { int cc; for (;;) { cc = getc (fp); if (cc == EOF) break; printf ("%c\n", cc); } } int main(int argc, char *argv []) { preprocess_file (stdin); exit (0); } but when i use it with UTF-8 encoded text it shows unredable character such as ï » ? ? § ? „ ? … ? ¤ ? ´ ? and advice ? Thanks

  Read the article

• xcode 4 creating a 2d grid (range and domain)

  - by user1706978

  I'm learning how to program c and i'm trying to make a program the finds the range (using an equation with x as the domain) of a 2d grid...ive already attempted it, but it's giving me all these errors on Xcode, any help?(As you can see, I'm quite stuck!) #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> float domain; float domain = 2.0; float domainsol(float x ) { domain = x; float func = 1.25 * x + 5.0; return func; } int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) { }

  Read the article

• Break the limit of threading, segmentation fault

  - by user353573

  use pthread_create to create limited number of threads running concurrently Successfully compile and run However, after adding function pointer array to run the function, Segmentation fault Where is wrong? workserver number: 0 Segmentation fault void* workserver(void arg) { int status; while(true) { printf("workserver number: %d\n", (int)arg); ( job_queue[(int)arg])(); sleep(3); status = pthread_mutex_lock(&data.mutex); if(status != 0) printf("%d lock mutex", status); data.value = 1; status = pthread_cond_signal(&data.cond); if(status != 0) printf("%d signal condition", status); status = pthread_mutex_unlock(&data.mutex); if(status != 0) printf("%d unlock mutex", status); } }

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322  | Next Page >