Search Results

Search found 27530 results on 1102 pages for 'sql truncate'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 338/1102 | < Previous Page | 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345  | Next Page >

  • Help with Oracle SQL Count function! =)

    - by user363024
    Hi guys.. The question im struggling with is this: i have a list of helicopter names in different charters and i need to find out WHICH helicopter has the least amount of charters booked. Once i find that out i need to ONLY display the one that has the least. I so far have this: SELECT Helicopter_Name COUNT (Distinct Charter_NUM) FROM Charter_Table GROUP BY Helicopter Name ^ this is where i am stuck, i realise MIN could be used to pick out the value that is the smallest but i am not sure how to integrate this into the command. Something like Where MIN = MIN Value Id really appreciate it

    Read the article

  • SQL Trigger dont works...

    - by Gabotron
    Is there a way in which a Trigger is not fired? We have this situation: We have a table and there are rows that are been deleted. We need to know who and/or when these row are deleted. We create this trigger: ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[AUDITdel_nit] ON [dbo].[Client] FOR DELETE AS Insert into AUDIT select 'Delete', getdate(), 'Row Deleted', SYSTEM_USER, host_name(), (select 'ID Client: ' + convert(varchar(12),Id) from deleted), 'Client' ,APP_NAME() We made somte test: deleting rows vis stored procedures and the deleted rows appears in our AUDIT table. But suddenly today we found a row deleted that dont appears in the AUDIT table... Any idea how it can be done?

    Read the article

  • Inserting Strings Without Trailing Spaces SQL

    - by Soo
    I have a database with a field named Field1 that has 100 nchars per entry. Each time I add a value, it is stored as: "value (100-ValueLength Spaces) " So Basically each stored value has a string of spaces after it. This is getting to be an issue when I try doing: if (value == "Example") because of all of the empty spaces after the string. How can I get it so the stored values don't have all of these trailing spaces?

    Read the article

  • SQL query showing missing expression

    - by Ashok Dasari
    Query to pull the data between Yseterday 6AM to today 6AM ... SELECT lot_id, log_time, batch_no, eqp_id, STATION_ID, EXTRACTVALUE (META_DATA, '/lot_info/A3') AS A3, EXTRACTVALUE (META_DATA, '/lot_info/A3Info') AS A3Info, EXTRACTVALUE ( META_DATA, '/lot_info/apc_status_info' ) AS apc_status_info FROM t_dlis_log_history WHERE ( (EQP_ID = 'ALC4360') OR (EQP_ID = 'ALC4361') OR (EQP_ID = 'ALC1360') OR (EQP_ID = 'ALC1361') OR (EQP_ID = 'ALC1362') OR (EQP_ID = 'ALC1363') OR (EQP_ID = 'ALC1364') OR (EQP_ID = 'ALC1365') OR (EQP_ID = 'ALC355') OR (EQP_ID = 'ALC353') OR (EQP_ID = 'ALC4350') OR (EQP_ID = 'ALC354') ) AND (( log_time >= DATEADD ( HOUR, 6, CONVERT(VARCHAR (10), GETDATE (), 110) ) AND ( log_time <= DATEADD ( HOUR, 6, CONVERT(VARCHAR (10), GETDATE () + 1, 110) ) ) ) It is showing error missing expression ...

    Read the article

  • merging two tables, while applying aggregates on the duplicates (max,min and sum)

    - by cloudraven
    I have a table (let's call it log) with a few millions of records. Among the fields I have Id, Count, FirstHit, LastHit. Id - The record id Count - number of times this Id has been reported FirstHit - earliest timestamp with which this Id was reported LastHit - latest timestamp with which this Id was reported This table only has one record for any given Id Everyday I get into another table (let's call it feed) with around half a million records with these fields among many others: Id Timestamp - Entry date and time. This table can have many records for the same id What I want to do is to update log in the following way. Count - log count value, plus the count() of records for that id found in feed FirstHit - the earliest of the current value in log or the minimum value in feed for that id LastHit - the latest of the current value in log or the maximum value in feed for that id. It should be noticed that many of the ids in feed are already in log. The simple thing that worked is to create a temporary table and insert into it the union of both as in Select Id, Min(Timestamp) As FirstHit, MAX(Timestamp) as LastHit, Count(*) as Count FROM feed GROUP BY Id UNION ALL Select Id, FirstHit,LastHit,Count FROM log; From that temporary table I do a select that aggregates Min(firsthit), max(lasthit) and sum(Count) Select Id, Min(FirstHit),Max(LastHit),Sum(Count) FROM @temp GROUP BY Id; and that gives me the end result. I could then delete everything from log and replace it with everything with temp, or craft an update for the common records and insert the new ones. However, I think both are highly inefficient. Is there a more efficient way of doing this. Perhaps doing the update in place in the log table?

    Read the article

  • How to select product that have the maximum price of each category?

    - by kimleng
    The below is my table that has the item such as: ProductId ProductName Category Price 1 Tiger Beer $12.00 2 ABC Beer $13.99 3 Anchor Beer $9.00 4 Apolo Wine $10.88 5 Randonal Wine $18.90 6 Wisky Wine $30.19 7 Coca Beverage $2.00 8 Sting Beverage $5.00 9 Spy Beverage $4.00 10 Angkor Beer $12.88 And I suppose that I have only three category in this table (I can have a lot of category in this table). And I want to show the maximum product's price of each category in this table.

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Reporting Services Bar Chart

    - by Avitus
    I am trying to create horizontal bar chart to look like a pill chart. I would like to take a either a stacked bar chart or a 100% stacked bar chart and put rounded ends onto this chart. I would only be using 1 row within the chart. One idea I had was just putting rounded images on either end of the chart to accomplish this but I'm not sure that this will give the smooth feel of a single pill. Does anyone have a good suggestion? I am not tied to the idea of using a chart object. But I would prefer to stay away from third party components that need to be purchased.

    Read the article

  • SQL ORDER BY thing1 ASC, thing2 DESC not working

    - by William
    it puts item1 down as DESC for some reason. edit: $sql_result = mysql_query("SELECT post, name, trip, Thread, sticky FROM (SELECT MIN(ID) AS min_id, MAX(ID) AS max_id, MAX(Date) AS max_date FROM test_posts GROUP BY Thread ) t_min_max INNER JOIN test_posts ON test_posts.ID = t_min_max.min_id WHERE Board=".$board." ORDER BY sticky ASC, max_date DESC", $db); http://prime.programming-designs.com/test_forum/viewboard.php?board=0&page=3

    Read the article

  • sqlserver how to set job priority

    - by Buzz
    Is there any way to set one job priority higher then other, In my case there are two jobs those are working on same set of tables,first JOB-A which is running every 12 hr and other JOB-B is every 10 minutes , i think at some time when they run simultaneously JOB-B is getting in to deadlock and get failed, i google the topic and found sqlgoverner is helpful in such cases does anyone know how to resolve?

    Read the article

  • Multiple Table Joins to Improve Performance?

    - by EdenMachine
    If I have a table structure like this: Transaction [TransID, ...] Document [DocID, TransID, ...] Signer [SignerID, ...] Signature [SigID, DocID, SignerID, ...] And the business logic is like this: Transactions can have multiple documents Documents can have multiple signatures And the same signer can have multiple signatures in multiple documents within the same transaction So, now to my actual question: If I wanted to find all the documents in a particular transaction, would it be better, performance-wise, if I also stored the TransID and the DocID in the Signer table as well so I have smaller joins. Otherwise, I'd have to join through the Signature Document Transaction Documents to get all the documents in the transaction for that signer. I think it's really messy to have that many relationships in the Signer table though and it doesn't seem "correct" to do it that way (also seems like an update nightmare) but I can see that it might be better performance for direct joins. Thoughts? TIA!

    Read the article

  • Help needed with Linq To Sql Query

    - by fearofawhackplanet
    I have the concept of valid/ordered transitions. So for example, it's not possible to move to status In progress from status Complete. Current and Next in table StatusTransition are FK (StatusType.Id). The Linq generator has created the following relations: Child Property Name: StatusTransitions1 Parent Property Name: StatusType1 Participating Properties: StatusType.Id -> StatusTransition.Next Child Property Name: StatusTransitions Parent Property Name: StatusType Participating Properties: StatusType.Id -> StatusTransition.Current I'm normally ok with Linq but I'm having difficulty getting the list of valid Next StatusTypes from the Current status. public List<StatusType> GetValidStatusTransitions(int statusId) { // trying to write something like the following // (obviously not correct) return _statusRepository .Where(s => s.Id == statusId) .Next.StatusTypes; }

    Read the article

  • SQL, problem with OrderBy / GroupBy

    - by Tristan
    Hi, In my table I have two fields among others : article_id and *version* *example: article_id : 5 // version 1 aricle_id: 5 // version 2 article_id: 6 // version 1* What i want to do is to retrieve the latest version for each article id (in my example i want to retrieve the article 5 version 2 object and article 6 and version 1 object). The problem is that mysql is doing the groupBy instead of the OrderBy so it returns to me the FIRST version of each article, but i want the opposit. Do you have an idea please ?

    Read the article

  • SQL IF ELSE with output params stored proc help

    - by Kettenbach
    Hi All, I have a stored proc (SS2008) that takes a couple int ids and needs to look up if they exist in a table before adding a record. I have an int output param I would like to return and set its value based on what occrured. I have this so far, but it always returns 1. Can someone point me in the right direction? BEGIN TRY IF EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM tbMap WHERE (cId= @CId) ) SET @result = -1; -- This C User is already mapped ELSE IF EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM tbMap WHERE (dId = @DId) ) SET @result = -2; -- This D User is already mapped ELSE INSERT INTO tbMap ( Login , Email , UserName , CId , DId) SELECT @UserName , usr.EmailAddress , usr.UserName , @CId , @DId FROM tbUser usr WHERE usr.iUserID = @DId SET @result = 1; RETURN END TRY What am I missing? Thanks for any tips. Cheers, ~ck in San Diego

    Read the article

  • Get top 2 rows from each unique field in a column

    - by Sai
    I have a table named tblItemResources in which I want to get the only 2 rows from each unique field in a column named effectiveDate (order by: ascending): tblItemResources Table |   empID   |   effectiveDate    |    Company   |    Description |   0-123    |    2014-01-23     |   DFD Comp  |   Analyst |   0-234    |    2014-01-23     |   ABC Comp   |  Manager |   0-222    |    2012-02-19     |   CDC Comp  |  Janitor |   0-213    |    2012-03-13     |   CBB Comp  |  Teller and so on. Any help would be much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • nested join linq-to-sql queries

    - by ile
    var result = ( from contact in db.Contacts where contact.ContactID == id join referContactID in db.ContactRefferedBies on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID join referContactName in db.Contacts on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID orderby contact.ContactID descending select new ContactReferredByView { ContactReferredByID = referContactID.ContactReferredByID, ContactReferredByName = referContactName.FirstName + " " + referContactName.LastName }).Single(); Problem is in this line: join referContactName in db.Contacts on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID where referContactID.ContactID is called from the above join line. How to nest these two joins? Thanks in advance! Ile

    Read the article

  • script to dynamically fix ophaned users after db restore

    - by JJgates
    After performing a database restore, I want to run a dynamic script to fix ophaned users. My script below loops through all users that are displayed after executing sp_change_users_login 'report' and apply "alter user [username] with login = [username]" to fix SID conflicts verses static go statements. Although, I'm getting an "incorrect syntax error on line 15." can't figure out why... DECLARE @Username varchar(100), @cmd varchar(100) DECLARE userLogin_cursor CURSOR FAST_FORWARD FOR SELECT UserName = name FROM sysusers WHERE issqluser = 1 and (sid IS NOT NULL AND sid <> 0×0) AND suser_sname(sid) IS NULL ORDER BY name FOR READ ONLY OPEN userLogin_cursor FETCH NEXT FROM userLogin_cursor INTO @Username WHILE @@fetch_status = 0 BEGIN SET @cmd = ‘ALTER USER ‘+@username+‘ WITH LOGIN ‘+@username EXECUTE(@cmd) FETCH NEXT FROM userLogin_cursor INTO @Username END CLOSE userLogin_cursor DEALLOCATE userLogin_cursor

    Read the article

  • SQL: Find the max record per group

    - by user319088
    I have one table, which has three fields and data. Name , Top , Total cat , 1 , 10 dog , 2 , 7 cat , 3 , 20 horse , 4 , 4 cat , 5 , 10 dog , 6 , 9 I want to select the record which has highest value of Total for each Name, so my result should be like this: Name , Top , Total cat , 3 , 20 horse , 4 , 4 Dog , 6 , 9 I tried group by name order by total, but it give top most record of group by result. Can anyone guide me, please?

    Read the article

  • Keeping Linq to SQL alive when using ViewModels (ASP.NET MVC)

    - by Kohan
    I have recently started using custom ViewModels (For example, CustomerViewModel) public class CustomerViewModel { public IList<Customer> Customers{ get; set; } public int ProductId{ get; set; } public CustomerViewModel(IList<Customer> customers, int productId) { this.Customers= customers; this.ProductId= productId; } public CustomerViewModel() { } } ... and am now passing them to my view instead of the Entities themselves (for example, var Custs = repository.getAllCusts(id) ) as it seems good practice to do so. The problem i have encountered is that when using ViewModels; by the time it has got to the the view i have lost the ability to lazy load on customers. I do not believe this was the case before using them. Is it possible to retain the ability of Lazy Loading while still using ViewModels? Or do i have to eager load using this method? Thanks, Kohan.

    Read the article

  • More efficient left join of big table

    - by Zeus
    Hello, I have the following (simplified) query select P.peopleID, P.peopleName, ED.DataNumber from peopleTable P left outer join ( select PE.peopleID, PE.DataNumber from formElements FE inner join peopleExtra PE on PE.ElementID = FE.FormElementID where FE.FormComponentID = 42 ) ED on ED.peopleID = P.peopleID Without the sub-query this procedure takes ~7 seconds, but with it, it takes about 3minutes. Given that table peopleExtra is rather large, is there a more efficient way to do that join (short of restructuring the DB) ?

    Read the article

  • Select records by comparing subsets

    - by devnull
    Given two tables (the rows in each table are distinct): 1) x | y z 2) x | y z ------- --- ------- --- 1 | a a 1 | a a 1 | b b 1 | b b 2 | a 1 | c 2 | b 2 | a 2 | c 2 | b 2 | c Is there a way to select the values in the x column of the first table for which all the values in the y column (for that x) are found in the z column of the second table? In case 1), expected result is 1. If c is added to the second table then the expected result is 2. In case 2), expected result is no record since neither of the subsets in the first table matches the subset in the second table. If c is added to the second table then the expected result is 1, 2. I've tried using except and intersect to compare subsets of first table with the second table, which works fine, but it takes too long on the intersect part and I can't figure out why (the first table has about 10.000 records and the second has around 10). EDIT: I've updated the question to provide an extra scenario.

    Read the article

  • Insert hex string value to sql server binary field is appending extra 0

    - by rotary_engine
    Have a binary field and want to insert into this from a hex string: insert into binaryTable(binaryField) values(convert(varbinary(max), 0x0)) however when I run select the value is return with an extra 0 as 0x00 This extra 0 is causing a problem in another application, I dont want it. Interesting, is if I do a select on an existing value and it returns say 0x55 then inserting this same value using the above query will return a select of 0x055. How to stop the extra 0 being added?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345  | Next Page >