Search Results

Search found 10764 results on 431 pages for 'extending ruby'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 341/431 | < Previous Page | 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348  | Next Page >

  • Rails: updating an item along with associated items

    - by shmichael
    Suppose I have a simple to-do list application. The application contains two models: lists (have an owner and description) items (have name and due-date) that belong to a specific list I would like to have a single edit screen for a list in which I update the list attributes (such as description) and also create/delete/modify associated items. There should be a single "save" button that will commit all changes. Unless save is pressed, any change to the list and the items should be forgotten. I wasn't able to find an elegant best practice for this. Would greatly appreciate any suggestions and/or references to existing implementations.

    Read the article

  • generate 10 UUID records and save it it database in rails

    - by user662503
    I need to create certain number of UUId records (based on the selection of a drop down) and save them in the database. Now I am generating only one unique id. Can this be done in the model in this way? Or do I need to write a helper file for that? def generate_unique_token=(value) self.secret = Base64.encode64(UUIDTools::UUID.random_create)[0..8] end My controller: def create @secretcode = Secretcode.new(params[:secretcode]) @user = User.new(params[:user]) @secretcode.user_id = @user @secretcode.generate_unique_token = params[:secretcode][:secret] if @secretcode.valid? @secretcode.save redirect_to secretcodes_path else render 'new' end end My view page <%= form_for(@secretcode) do |f| %> <%= f.select(:secret, options_for_select([['1',1], ['10',10], ['20',20],['50',50]['100',100]])) %> <%= render 'layouts/error' %> <%=f.label :secret%> <%= f.hidden_field :user %> <%=f.submit :generate %> <% end %>

    Read the article

  • Unwanted redirection after authentication

    - by jodaha
    Hello world! We have a form to submit ratings for a certain restaurant in a in our views/restaurants/show.html.erb. We only want logged in users to create new ratings. We put before_filter :login_required, :only = [ :new, :create ] (but we also tried only ":create") on top of our RatingsController. If we click the submit button after typing in the rating details we are prompted to log in (which is what we want). After filling in username and password and submitting the login form we get redirected back to e. g. /restaurants/36/ratings, but we want to be redirected back to where we came from - e. g. /restaurants/36/. We tried redirect_to(:back), but this redirects us back to the login form. Also the new rating does not get saved to the database. Any idea how we can change the redirection and how to make sure the rating gets saved? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Removing &NBSP; in Rails

    - by Trip
    I am trying to remove all &nbsp;'s in my model with the following method : def about_us_sans_spaces self.about_us = replace(self.about_us, "&nbsp;", " ") end Except! it turns out 'replace' isn't a method in rails. How would you remove the  s? Mind you, I have already tried sanitized, simple_format. My view looks like this right now: = truncate(sanitize(simple_format(organization.about_us_sans_spaces), :tags => ''), 125).titleize

    Read the article

  • Rails 2.3: using another models named_scope inside another named_scope

    - by mustafi
    Hi Let's say I have two models like so: class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user named_scope :about_x :conditions => "comments.text like '%x%')" end class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :comments end How can I add a named_scope to the user model like so class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :comments named_scope :comments_about_x, :includes => :comments, :comments_named_scope => :about_x end Which allows me to do all_user_comments_about_x = User.comments_about_x The reasoning is I often need to use the comment models about_x named scope logic but I don't want to have "comments.text like '%x%')" scattered around my code. I hope this make sense :) Thank you

    Read the article

  • Activerecord join search

    - by VP
    Hi, i have two models: class Category has many :jobs end class Job belongs_to :category end So for sure i'm able to do c = Category.first c.jobs My question is: how can i find just categories that has at least one job?

    Read the article

  • Rails: How to preload a message to user

    - by Michael
    I have a Rails based prelaunch site that has some rotating background images (which are important for selling the idea of the site) that are taking too long to load, such that the users are leaving the site before they load. The only thing they're seeing is the email submission box. What's a good way to show a message to the users that the site will take some time to load but then have that message disappear after a reasonable period of time. I'm guessing a jQuery fadeOut() with a timer, but I'm not sure how long to set the timer for, because I'm not sure at what time it would start counting. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • How to override 'where' in rails 3

    - by Zakwan Alhajjar
    I have upgraded my application from rails 2.3.8 to 3.0.3 . But I'm facing a problem. I was using 'find' but the overriding doesn't work in rails 3: # override activerecord's find to allow us to find by name or id transparently def self.find(*args) if args.is_a?(Array) and args.first.is_a?(String) and (args.first.index(/[a-zA-Z\-_]+/) or args.first.to_i.eql?(0) ) find_by_login_slug(args) else super end end I'm wondering if there is a way to make this work in rails 3 or even by using where instead. thanks

    Read the article

  • How to exclude an array of ids from query in Rails (using ActiveRecord)?

    - by CuriousYogurt
    I would like to perform an ActiveRecord query that returns all records except those records that have certain ids. The ids I would like excluded are stored in an array. So: ids_to_exclude = [1,2,3] array_without_excluded_ids = Item. ??? I'm not sure how to complete the second line. Background: What I've already tried: I'm not sure background is necessary, but I've already tried various combinations of .find and .where. For example: array_without_excluded_ids = Item.find(:all, :conditions => { "id not IN (?)", ids_to_exclude }) array_without_excluded_ids = Item.where( "items.id not IN ?", ids_to_exclude) These fail. This tip might be on the right track, but I have not succeeded in adapting it. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Does the '#' modifier for cropping images in Paperclip work only for square images?

    - by user3451384
    It is very well documented that you can create square thumbnails with center cropping with Paperclip (4) and Rails (4). I would like to have an image of very specific dimensions (e.g. 200x100) and if input an image of let's say 800x200 it is first resized to 400x100 and then the width (400) is cropped down to 200 pixel from the center (i.e. 100px cut from the right and 100 px cut from the left). I tried with 200x100# and it does not appear to work (i.e. the '#' has no effect). I have found that I could adapt other solutions such as this, but I was wondering if '#' is supposed to work only for cropping to square images, or is a Paperclip bug or I am doing something wrong...

    Read the article

  • No route matches [PUT] error in active_admin

    - by Alex
    in active_admin partials created a form input: <%= semantic_nested_form_for @item, :url => admin_items_path(@item) do |f| %> <fieldset class="inputs"> <ol> <%= f.input :category %></br> <%= f.input :title %> <%= f.input :photo1 %> <%= f.input :photo2 %> </ol> </fieldset> <%= f.fields_for :ItemColors do |i| %> <fieldset class="inputs"> <ol> <%= i.input :DetailColor %> <%= i.input :size, :input_html => { :size => "10" } %> <%= i.link_to_remove "remove" %> </ol> </fieldset> <% end %> <%= f.link_to_add "add", :ItemColors %> <%= f.actions %> <% end %> to create a new Item okay creates and throws On the New Item, but if I do update an existing item is routed to an error occurs while such a path exists: No route matches [PUT] "/admin/items.150" #150 is item_id rake routes: batch_action_admin_items POST /admin/items/batch_action(.:format) admin/items#batch_action admin_items GET /admin/items(.:format) admin/items#index POST /admin/items(.:format) admin/items#create new_admin_item GET /admin/items/new(.:format) admin/items#new edit_admin_item GET /admin/items/:id/edit(.:format) admin/items#edit admin_item GET /admin/items/:id(.:format) admin/items#show PUT /admin/items/:id(.:format) admin/items#update DELETE /admin/items/:id(.:format) admin/items#destroy help to solve this problem UPD I found the error, but not yet understood how to fix it the upgrade is a request: PUT "/admin/items" but should: PUT "/admin/items/some_id" any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Rails 3 does not render HTML as markup

    - by suebphatt
    Hello, Stackoverflow. I submitted a form, to create single row in SQL database table, as a blog entry: <p>This is a paragraph.</p> And the result, when I query it out for display, via Rails's ActiveRecord, it rendered like this, : <p>This is a paragraph.</p> and here's the code, when I view source in browser: &lt;p&gt;This is a paragraph.&lt;/p&gt; How do I solve this? Or I just have to convert the < and > by Javascript? Thank you :)

    Read the article

  • Complex Forms Generating Error

    - by user1648020
    I am working on an application that allows students to create a catalog of courses they are taking for a semester. I have created models for user; course; subject and category. Users can have many courses. Each course can have many subjects and categories. The tables for courses, subjects and categories include the following: Catalog: user_id; subject_id, category_id and course_id Courses: user_id; coursedetail_id Coursedetail: name; description Subject: name; description Category: name; description The idea is that an Admin can create a list of courses; subjects and categories and that the user can select the courses they want to add to their catalog. I have seperated courses and coursedetails because I envision that the coursedetails will grow overtime and the courses table will allow me to join the user_id and cousres details to rreport on if necessary. I attempted to follow Ryan's railscast on Complex Forms thinking that that I should use a complex form and has many relationship to get things working -- but I get an error in the catalog controller - cannot locate catalog_id which I know is in the table. I am now not sure if complex forms is the way to go or I should be looking at another direction to get the appropriate form in place. Any assistance would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Rails valiation among a three model relationship

    - by Andrew
    I'm working on a three model relationship with one aspect that I'm not sure how to approach. Here's the basic relationship: class Taxonomy has_many :terms # attribute: `inclusive`, default => false end class Term belongs_to :taxonomy has_and_belongs_to_many :photos end class Photo has_and_belongs_to_many :terms end This is pretty straightforward stuff except for one thing: A Taxonomy can be either 'Inclusive' or 'Exclusive'. Exclusive means the terms are mutually exclusive, Inclusive means they're not. So, if a Taxonomy is exclusive ie. taxonomy.inclusive = false, then there can only be one term from that taxonomy attached to a given photo. Now, I can handle this on the client-side without a problem, but I am not quite sure how to set up a validation on Photos (or somewhere else) that says basically: "validate that no more than one term from an exclusive taxonomy is associated with this record." Any ideas on how to do that?

    Read the article

  • New to Git. Made a big mistake with git commit and ended up at an older commit

    - by Ramario Depass
    I'm new to Git and I've made a huge mistake. Git kept prompting me with git - rejected master -> master (non-fast-forward). But, I still committed by using: --force This was disastrous, the whole project changed back to the stage it was at about a week ago. I've lost so many changes. I seem to have been pushed back to an earlier commit. Is there anyway I can get back to one of my newer commits? As I have made an enormous amount of changes and need to get them back. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Shedule tasks question

    - by gabac
    Hi everyone I have a though question :) Let's say you get some data which is due at a certain point int the future. You get A saying my task is due in 1h and other which says his task is due in 1.5h. The information is collected on your server. In which programming language or even how would solve that? So task a will be executed in 1h, task B in 1.5h. I read something about java scheduler but I'm not yet sure if this is the right way. What are ur ideas? Cheers

    Read the article

  • Array Flatten does not work (Instnace variable nil)

    - by Nick
    I was trying to write a simple array flatten method, but it does not work using instance variable. It works only using class variables. Can anyone tell me why? and how to make it work using instance variables. class Array @y = [] def flatten_array self.each do |x| if x.class.to_s != 'Array' @y << x else x.flatten_array end end return @y end end a = [1,2,3,4,5] b = [6,7,8] c = [9,10] a1 = [12,13,a,b,c] puts a1.inspect b1 = a1.flatten_array puts b1.inspect

    Read the article

  • Cant use with clauses in find_by_sql

    - by PaulMurrayCbr
    Activerecord seems to be peeking at my sql and getting it wrong. I am finding that this: sql = " select etn.* from edittree_name etn where id = #{id}" Name.find_by_sql(sql) works, but this: sql = " with pp as ( select * from dual) select etn.* from edittree_name etn where id = #{id}" Name.find_by_sql(sql) Gives me a "undefined method `each' for 1:Fixnum". Any clues? Is there a "find_by_raw_sql (and don't try to understand it yourself)" method?

    Read the article

  • ajax request internal server error

    - by joe
    Everything is working good on local but when i try same codes in production, i get 500 (Internal Server Error) error. entries.controller def set_spam @entry = Entry.find(params[:entry_id]) @entry.spam = params[:what] == "spam" ? true : false @entry.save respond_to do |format| format.js end end application.js $(".entry-actions .spams img").click(function () { $.post("/set-spam", { entry_id: $(this).attr("entry_id"), what: $(this).attr("class") } ); return false; }); view <div class="spams"> <img title="spam" class="spam" src="/images/pixel.gif" entry_id="<%= entry.id %>" /> </div> route post "/set-spam" => "entries#set_spam"

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348  | Next Page >