Search Results

Search found 7787 results on 312 pages for 'apt upgrade'.

Page 35/312 | < Previous Page | 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42  | Next Page >

  • Microsoft Offers Cheap Windows 8 Upgrade

    Though the software giant hasn't answered all of the questions, Computerworld collected many of them in one place and included the answers. You can also visit Microsoft's blog post for the details. Starting at general availability, if your PC is running Windows XP, Windows Vista, or Windows 7 you will qualify to download an upgrade to Windows 8 Pro for just $39.99 in 131 markets. And if you want, you can add Windows Media Center for free through the 'add features' option within Windows 8 Pro after your upgrade, the Microsoft blog post helpfully states. If you choose to upgrade, the Windows 8...

    Read the article

  • How to use a retail Windows 7 Professional license key to upgrade an installed Windows 7 Home Premium machine

    - by jalperin
    I purchased a retail version of Windows 7 Professional and installed it on a computer. That machine has died, and I replaced it with a new computer which came with Windows 7 Home Premium already installed. I'd like to have Professional, not Home Premium, on the new machine, and I don't want to pay for an "Anytime Upgrade" because I already have a valid Windows 7 Professional license (for the dead computer). Is there a way to legally upgrade using my Professional license key? I've already installed programs, data, etc on the new machine, so I don't want to reformat and start from scratch.

    Read the article

  • Windows 8.1 upgrade created a second recovery partition. Can I remove the original?

    - by Dave S
    Windows 8.1 upgrade created a second recovery partition. Can I remove the original? Prior to this the partitions were Recovery, EFI, OS(C:), Data(D:). After the upgrade partitions are Recovery, EFI, OS(C:), Recovery, Data(D:). The first Recovery partition is 1023MB the second is 350MB The "Create a system image" tool selects the EFI, OS(C:), and the second 350MB Recovery partitions. The first 1023MB Recovery partition is not listed, I have to "assume" it is now redundant. The factory (HP) Recovery Partition was removed using the HP provided tool after creating recovery disks, and the D: partition created months ago.

    Read the article

  • how to upgrade the apple OS from 10.6.8 to 10.9?

    - by Mohamed KALLEL
    I read the following informations from the apple discussion: Mac OS X 10.9 Mavericks, breaks the tradition, and is available free (subject certain license restrictions) for anyone from 10.6.8 through 10.8.5 as long as they meet the system requirements for 10.8 I have apple laptop with OS 10.6.8 and I want to upgrade my OS to 10.9. and according to abpve information this is possible. But I do not how to do that with my apple laptop. Could you tell me how to upgrade my apple OS from 10.6.8 to 10.9?

    Read the article

  • Is Family Tree Maker 2011 the right upgrade for a FTM 11 user?

    - by bill weaver
    My father has used Family Tree Maker for years, but hasn't upgraded since version 11. It is difficult to tell from reviews at Amazon and other places whether upgrading to FTM 2011 is a good choice. File incompatibilities and upgrade woes sound like customer service is lacking, and i've read reports of it uploading your data to their database but then trying to sell you a download of data. Looking at the ancestry.com site makes me think it's solely about selling add-ons and upgrades. On the other hand, the feature set seems fairly rich and the software has a pretty strong following. I was able to get Gramps working on my system, but that's not going to work for my dad. Any advice on a good upgrade path?

    Read the article

  • When should I upgrade to Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx)? [closed]

    - by Emyr
    I'm a web developer for a small non-IT firm. When 9.10 came out, I was using it with no adverse effects from about a month before release (iirc, first beta), initially as an upgrade but as a clean install later to ensure my system would be consistent with most other 9.10 systems. The last alpha of 10.04 came out last week, with another 2 weeks before beta. I'm quite eager to do it today, but obviously the usual "not for production systems" notice is still in place. When should I upgrade? Do I need to worry about software installed from source? (./configure, make, make install etc) Is the attraction of a non-brown theme really this tempting for you?

    Read the article

  • Linux: how to restore config file using apt-get/aptitude?

    - by o_O Tync
    I've occasionally lost my config file "/etc/mysql/my.cnf", and want to restore it. The file belongs to package mysql-common which is needed for some vital functionality so I can't just purge && install it: the dependencies would be also uninstalled (or if I can ignore them temporarily, they won't be working). Is there a way to restore the config file from a package without un-ar-ing the package file? dpkg-reconfigure mysql-common did not restore it.

    Read the article

  • Is a Windows 7 professional upgrade over vista home possible ?

    - by Saulius
    This has probably been asked before, but I want to be 100% sure before buying: if I have a laptop with an OEM version of Windows Vista Home Premium installed, can I buy the Windows 7 professional upgrade and install it ? I don't care whether it will be an actual upgrade or a clean install (that would actually be even better), what I'm curious is whether this is actually legal (going from home to professional). And if this is possible, how does it work ? Do I have to have Vista installed when upgrading so that the installer can check that I actually do own a genuine copy or does it ask for the vista key (which I'm not sure I have, since it's an OEM version) ?

    Read the article

  • How can I upgrade from Windows 8 x32 to x64 fastest & easiest?

    - by parkviewK
    I was upgrading the hardware in a family member's computer and purchased the Windows 8 upgrade for $40 from their website. Not thinking, after I installed it I realized I now have 32bit Windows on this 64bit capable machine. Did some research and it appears that the upgrade assistant just gives you whatever architecture you were uprgading from (windows 7 32bit). Question is, what is my best option here? I have already purchased a key, will this work on x64? I'm considering installing Windows 8 Preview x64 and upgrading from there, but not sure if that will work or if it will make me purchase it again.

    Read the article

  • Upgrade PHP 5.1.6 to 5.2.x on Fedora 6 - Solutions?

    - by nicorellius
    I have a CRM on an old Fedora server, running Apache 2.2.6, MySQL 5.0.27, and PHP 5.1.6. I see a couple of options to fix my problem, but I thought I would consult the pros on this one here at Server Fault to see if I'm missing anything. This is after spending a good while searching the net for solutions. Option 1 Upgrade Fedora, step-wise, to Fedora 7 and then to 8, and then the PHP packages I need would be available. I know this is hazardous, because of repository location, dependencies, etc. Option 2 Upgrade using this method. This may or may not work, and so would be considered a crap shoot. I consulted some IT people and they say the best best is to back up data and build a new server with updated hard and software. I happen to agree, but wanted to exhaust all my resources first.

    Read the article

  • Update Errors in Xubuntu 12.10

    - by wil
    I updated by computer from 12.04 to 12.10 and after I finished updating when I turned on my computer I am unable to update my computer. I tried install a new copy of 13.04 but my cpu doesn't support pae. I have a IBM Thinkpad T42 with a 1.7 gigahertx Cpu. When updating through terminal This is the output. sudo apt-get upgrade: [sudo] password for wil: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-image-extra-3.5.0-34-generic : Depends: linux-image-3.5.0-34-generic but it is not installed linux-image-generic : Depends: linux-image-3.5.0-34-generic but it is not installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. sudo apt-get upgrade -f: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: linux-image-3.5.0-34-generic 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 3 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/11.8 MB of archives. After this operation, 25.9 MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y (Reading database ... 191530 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking linux-image-3.5.0-34-generic (from .../linux-image-3.5.0-34-generic_3.5.0-34.55_i386.deb) ... This kernel does not support a non-PAE CPU. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-34-generic_3.5.0-34.55_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.5.0-34-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-34-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.5.0-34-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-34-generic Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-34-generic_3.5.0-34.55_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) wil@wil-ThinkPad-T42:~/Desktop$

    Read the article

  • dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python2.6-minimal_2.6.6-5ubuntu1_i386.deb (--unpack)

    - by udo
    I had an issue (Question 199582) which was resolved. Unfortunately I am stuck at this point now. Running root@X100e:/var/cache/apt/archives# apt-get dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: file libexpat1 libmagic1 libreadline6 libsqlite3-0 mime-support python python-minimal python2.6 python2.6-minimal readline-common 0 upgraded, 11 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/5,204kB of archives. After this operation, 19.7MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y (Reading database ... 6108 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking python2.6-minimal (from .../python2.6-minimal_2.6.6-5ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... new installation of python2.6-minimal; /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages is a directory which is expected a symlink to /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages. please find the package shipping files in /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages and file a bug report to ship these in /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages instead aborting installation of python2.6-minimal dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python2.6-minimal_2.6.6-5ubuntu1_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/python2.6-minimal_2.6.6-5ubuntu1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) results in above error. Running root@X100e:/var/cache/apt/archives# dpkg -i python2.6-minimal_2.6.6-5ubuntu1_i386.deb (Reading database ... 6108 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking python2.6-minimal (from python2.6-minimal_2.6.6-5ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... new installation of python2.6-minimal; /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages is a directory which is expected a symlink to /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages. please find the package shipping files in /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages and file a bug report to ship these in /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages instead aborting installation of python2.6-minimal dpkg: error processing python2.6-minimal_2.6.6-5ubuntu1_i386.deb (--install): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: python2.6-minimal_2.6.6-5ubuntu1_i386.deb results in above error. Running root@X100e:/var/cache/apt/archives# dpkg -i --force-depends python2.6-minimal_2.6.6-5ubuntu1_i386.deb (Reading database ... 6108 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking python2.6-minimal (from python2.6-minimal_2.6.6-5ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... new installation of python2.6-minimal; /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages is a directory which is expected a symlink to /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages. please find the package shipping files in /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages and file a bug report to ship these in /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages instead aborting installation of python2.6-minimal dpkg: error processing python2.6-minimal_2.6.6-5ubuntu1_i386.deb (--install): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: python2.6-minimal_2.6.6-5ubuntu1_i386.deb is not able to fix this. Any clues how to fix this?

    Read the article

  • Processor upgrade on a laptop vs. Ram upgrade. Also does ram always matter?

    - by Evan
    I have a Dell Inspiron 14r (N4110) with an Intel Core i3 and 4gb of ram. It runs very smoothly, however gaming on this laptop is very limited. This is mostly because of integrated graphics but i have seen a computer with a Core i5, and very similar specs otherwise, run games that the N4110 cannot. This other computer has integrated graphics and 6gb of ram. I am wondering whether upgrading ram or upgrading the processor make the most difference in performance. Which setup would get better performance, an i5 with 4gb of ram or an i3 with 8 gb of ram? (Both with integrated graphics) Also, is there a certain point at which you have too much ram for the computer to ever possibly use? For instance is there really any difference in performance between 8 gb and 16 gb of ram?

    Read the article

  • sudo apt-get update problem

    - by Jeon
    I have a problem with sudo apt-get update that I can't seem to fix and It's causing problems with alot of installations I want to do. I run Ubuntu 12.04. Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise InRelease Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates InRelease Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports InRelease Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security InRelease Get:1 http://repository.spotify.com stable InRelease [2,979 B] Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise InRelease Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise InRelease Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable InRelease Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise Release.gpg Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates Release.gpg Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports Release.gpg Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise Release.gpg Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security Release.gpg Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise Release Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise Release Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise Release Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates Release Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner amd64 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports Release Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security Release Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner i386 Packages Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free amd64 Packages Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free i386 Packages Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner Translation-en Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free Translation-en Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe Translation-en Fetched 2,979 B in 9s (328 B/s) W: GPG error: http://repository.spotify.com stable InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 082CCEDF94558F59 W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. I would appreciate a fix to this. Thank you for the help.

    Read the article

  • I can't add PPA repository behind the proxy (with @ in the username)

    - by kenorb
    I'm trying to add the ppa repository (as a root) with the following command: export HTTP_PROXY="http://[email protected]:[email protected]:8080" add-apt-repository ppa:nilarimogard/webupd8 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/add-apt-repository", line 125, in <module> ppa_info = get_ppa_info_from_lp(user, ppa_name) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/softwareproperties/ppa.py", line 84, in get_ppa_info_from_lp curl.perform() pycurl.error: (56, 'Received HTTP code 407 from proxy after CONNECT') Unfortunately it doesn't work. Looks like curl is connecting to the proxy, but the proxy says that Authentication is Required. I've tried with .curlrc, http_proxy env instead, but it doesn't work. strace -e network,write -s1000 add-apt-repository ppa:nilarimogard/webupd8 socket(PF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 4 socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 4 connect(4, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(8080), sin_addr=inet_addr("165.x.x.232")}, 16) = -1 EINPROGRESS (Operation now in progress) getsockopt(4, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ERROR, [0], [4]) = 0 getpeername(4, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(8080), sin_addr=inet_addr("165.x.x.232")}, [16]) = 0 getsockname(4, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(46025), sin_addr=inet_addr("161.20.75.220")}, [16]) = 0 sendto(4, "CONNECT launchpad.net:443 HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: launchpad.net:443\r\nUser-Agent: PycURL/7.22.0\r\nProxy-Connection: Keep-Alive\r\nAccept: application/json\r\n\r\n", 146, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 146 recvfrom(4, "HTTP/1.1 407 Proxy Authentication Required\r\nProxy-Authenticate: BASIC realm=\"proxy\"\r\nCache-Control: no-cache\r\nPragma: no-cache\r\nContent-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8\r\nProxy-Connection: close\r\nSet-Cookie: BCSI-CS-91b9906520151dad=2; Path=/\r\nConnection: close\ Maybe it's because there is @ sign in the username? Wget works with proxy fine. Related: How do I add a repository from behind a proxy? Environment Ubuntu 12.04 curl 7.22.0 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.22.0 OpenSSL/1.0.1 zlib/1.2.3.4 libidn/1.23 librtmp/2.3 curl Features: GSS-Negotiate IDN IPv6 Largefile NTLM NTLM_WB SSL libz TLS-SRP

    Read the article

  • How to resolve - dpkg error : old pre-removal script returned error exit status 102

    - by Siva Prasad Varma
    I am unable to install or remove a package on my Ubuntu 10.04 due to the following error. $ sudo apt-get autoremove Password: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: busybox 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 9 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/212kB of archives. After this operation, 627kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Selecting previously deselected package nscd. (Reading database ... 235651 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace nscd 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8 (using .../nscd_2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8_amd64.deb) ... invoke-rc.d: not a symlink: /etc/rc2.d/S76nscd dpkg: warning: old pre-removal script returned error exit status 102 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... invoke-rc.d: not a symlink: /etc/rc2.d/S76nscd dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/nscd_2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8_amd64.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 102 update-rc.d: warning: /etc/rc2.d/S76nscd is not a symbolic link invoke-rc.d: not a symlink: /etc/rc2.d/S76nscd dpkg: error while cleaning up: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 102 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/nscd_2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) What should I do to resolve this error? I have tried sudo dpkg --remove --force-remove-reinstreq nscd but it did not work.

    Read the article

  • After force-installing a 32-bit deb failed, how can I install the 64-bit version?

    - by TryTryAgain
    I tried to dpkg -i --force-architecture google-earth-stable_i386.deb and it failed. But now when I try to install the amd64.deb it fails saying dpkg: error processing google-earth-stable_current_amd64.deb (--install): google-earth-stable: 6.2.2.6613-r0 (Multi-Arch: no) is not co-installable with google-earth-stable:i386 6.2.2.6613-r0 (Multi-Arch: no) which is currently installed Errors were encountered while processing: google-earth-stable_current_amd64.deb somehow it thinks the i386 version is installed. No google-earth files or directories even exist. sudo dpkg --configure -a outputs: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of google-earth-stable:i386: google-earth-stable:i386 depends on lsb-core (= 3.2). dpkg: error processing google-earth-stable:i386 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: google-earth-stable:i386 so it does exist in some capacity. sudo apt-get -f install does nothing out of the ordinary: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 10 not upgraded. The weird thing is that synaptic doesn't show any google earth package available let alone installed, nothing under the broken filter either. I have also tried sudo apt-get autoremove and sudo apt-get autoclean So, my question: How can I get rid of this issue?

    Read the article

  • How can I force a major upgrade to not switch to maintenance mode using the old installation package

    - by Brian
    I have an installer that I would like to use for a major upgrade. I have done the following: Increased the version number (from a.b.c to a.b.c+1) Changed the ProductCode Kept the same UpgradeCode Made the appropriate entry in the Upgrade table Changed the component ID of an existing component Changed the name of the installer package Changed the PackageCode Basically I've done everything I can think of to force MSI to treat this as a major upgrade. However, when I attempt to install this new package, the installer log says "Product registered: entering maintenance mode" and proceeds to try to find the old installer file (which fails, since the new installer is in a different folder than was used for the original installation, and wasn't even what I wanted to happen). What am I missing? Why does the installer switch to maintenance mode right away rather than perform the major upgrade? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to uninstall java6

    - by infaustus
    I am trying root@vz10931:/var/www/mailer# apt-get remove --purge sun-java6-bin Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done You might want to run apt-get -f install to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: sun-java6-jdk: Depends: sun-java6-bin (>= 6.24-1build0.8.04.1) but it is not going to be installed sun-java6-jre: Depends: java-common (>= 0.24) but it is not installable Depends: sun-java6-bin (>= 6.24-1build0.8.04.1) but it is not going to be installed or ia32-sun-java6-bin (>= 6.24-1build0.8.04.1) but it is not installable vim: Depends: vim-common (= 1:7.1-138+1ubuntu3.1) but 2:7.3.154+hg~74503f6ee649-2ubuntu3 is to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). Below are my sources.list deb http://pl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://pl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy main restricted universe multiverse deb http://pl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy-updates main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://pl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy-updates main restricted universe multiverse deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hardy-security main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hardy-security main restricted universe multiverse Ubuntu version - Hardy Heron Anyone know how to remove java ?

    Read the article

  • How can I roll back xserver-xorg-core and xserver-common?

    - by Ville Sundberg
    A recent update to Xorg broke my desktop, which now looks like this: http://i.imgur.com/PbBxh.jpg In short, the desktop background is not updating on the secondary display. (And if there is no secondary display, the primary display background stops updating.) Looking into the history, I found that this happened right after upgrading two packages: xserver-xorg-core xserver-common These were upgraded to 1.9.0-0ubuntu7.3. I'd like to downgrade these packages. How do I do that? I've checked that both have another version in the maverick repo: xserver-xorg-core: Installed: 2:1.9.0-0ubuntu7.3 Candidate: 2:1.9.0-0ubuntu7.3 Version table: *** 2:1.9.0-0ubuntu7.3 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2:1.9.0-0ubuntu7 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main amd64 Packages However, apt won't let me downgrade them: ville@fluxx ~ % sudo apt-get install xserver-common=2:1.9.0-0ubuntu7 xserver-xorg-core=2:1.9.0-0ubuntu7 The following packages have unmet dependencies: xserver-xorg-core : Depends: xserver-xorg but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages And this is the reason: ville@fluxx ~ % sudo apt-get install xserver-common=2:1.9.0-0ubuntu7 xserver-xorg-core=2:1.9.0-0ubuntu7 xserver-xorg-core The following packages have unmet dependencies: xserver-xorg-core : Depends: xserver-common (>= 2:1.9.0-0ubuntu7.3) but 2:1.9.0-0ubuntu7 is to be installed E: Broken packages Am I out of options here?

    Read the article

  • Can't (re)install lazarus

    - by twice
    I had Lazarus installed (from website, not USC), while upgrading to 13.10 and after that, it posted some error message (which I can't remember) at every start. I decided it shouldn't suffer, so I started reinstalling it, but it didn't work. then I thought I'll start all over, and deleted and purged everything. But it still would not install. I found a similar, very similar question to mine here: Cant correctly install Lazarus I tried everything said there: sudo dpkg -l | grep "^rc" returned some packages: since sudo apt-get -f brought up the apt-get help message, and sudo apt-get -f install did nothing, I went ahead and manually purged every broken package, which seemed to bring me forward, since it removed the entries in sudo dpkg -l | grep "^rc". When I was done I tried it again, since it didn't work I rebooted, no change. this is the error message I get on the attempt to install the first package (fpc-2.6.2): root@Someone-PC:~# dpkg -i /home/someone/Desktop/fpc_2.6.2-0_amd64\ \(3\).deb (Reading database ... 242209 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking fpc (from .../fpc_2.6.2-0_amd64 (3).deb) ... dpkg: error processing /home/someone/Desktop/fpc_2.6.2-0_amd64 (3).deb (--install): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/fpc/2.6.2/msg/errores.msg', which is also in package fp-compiler-2.6.2 2.6.2-5 dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /home/someone/Desktop/fpc_2.6.2-0_amd64 (3).deb So, how can I fix this? And install Lazarus?

    Read the article

  • Problem with dpkg-preconfigure, how to correct?

    - by Eric Wilson
    I was trying to install TeamViewer, and I followed the instructions here even though they specify 11.10 instead of 12.04 (what I'm running). In particular, I executed. $ wget http://www.teamviewer.com/download/teamviewer_linux.deb $ sudo dpkg -i teamviewer_linux.deb The dpkg command failed, and after this point my packaging system has been broken. The software center instructs me to try: $ sudo apt-get -f install which leads to Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: teamviewer7:i386 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 17 not upgraded. 9 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 89.0 kB of archives. After this operation, 81.9 MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Get:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main dash amd64 0.5.7-2ubuntu2 [89.0 kB] Fetched 89.0 kB in 1s (83.9 kB/s) E: Sub-process /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true returned an error code (100) E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true At this point I'm stumped.

    Read the article

  • to upgrade / install wine 1.55 on ubuntu 12.04 or any distro

    - by user67550
    Wine news and installation 1.5.5 on ubuntu Now available in PPA wine version 1.55, an application that lets Windows programs run on any distribution with GNU / Linux. Wine (recursive acronym in English for Wine Is Not an Emulator, which means "Wine Is Not an Emulator") is a reimplementation of the application programming interface for Win16 and Win32 operating systems based on Unix. Allows execution of programs designed for MS-DOS and Microsoft Windows Version 3.11, 95, 98, Me, NT, 2000, XP, Vista and 7 The name was originally an acronym Wine Windows Emulator. This meaning was later changed to the current recursive acronym. These are some of the highlights: Support for the installation of Mono as a complement to wine in the package. The dither pattern brushes in the motor DIB. Support to install the runtime. NET 4.0. D3dx9 DDS files supported. Several bug fixes. To install on Ubuntu just open the console and type: sudo add-apt-repository ppa: ubuntu-wine/ppa sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install wine1.5 Source: ubuntutips If you enjoyed this post share it with your friends, thanks

    Read the article

  • Completely unable to install python2.7-dev

    - by gath
    Am totally stuck! Am unable completely to install python2.7-dev on my Ubuntu13.04. I have tried all the tricks mentioned on this site (askubuntu.com) and many other sites on the web but still nothing! Am running Ubuntu 13.04 64bit on a virtualbox, but every time I run sudo apt-get install python2.7-dev, I get the following error; python2.7-dev : Depends: python2.7 (= 2.7.3-0ubuntu3.5) but 2.7.4-2ubuntu3 is to be installed Depends: libpython2.7 (= 2.7.3-0ubuntu3.5) but 2.7.4-2ubuntu3 is to be installed Depends: libexpat1-dev but it is not going to be installed Depends: libssl-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. I've tried to do apt-get update, but still nothing! I've even tried installing Python2.7 from sources, but still nothing doing! Is there a single package with all the dependencies I can download, that can just install everything (Python2.7-dev) or is there another trick I can use to get the Python-dev headers installed on my machine. Hint: I've noticed when I run sudo apt-get update , somewhere along the updates I've seen some errors; ... Get:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release.gpg [198 B] Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com raring Release Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates Release Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports Release Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com raring-security Release Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release [98.7 kB] Err http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main Translation-en_US Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main Translation-en ... On my precise-updates.list file is a single entry; deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted I don't know if that might help Help! Paul

    Read the article

  • Package manager doesn't work anymore

    - by LukaD
    I'm using ubuntu 10.10 and recently my package manager has stopped working because of some problems with dependencies or something. I can't upgrade, install or uninstall anything at all. This is a huge problem. I couldn't find a solution to this with google so I'm asking here for help. This is what apt-get -f install outputs LANG=en_US.UTF-8 sudo apt-get install -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required: firefox-4.0-core Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up openjdk-6-jre-headless (6b20-1.9.5-0ubuntu1) ... update-alternatives: error: alternative path /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/bin/java doesn't exist. dpkg: error processing openjdk-6-jre-headless (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: openjdk-6-jre-headless E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42  | Next Page >