Search Results

Search found 3140 results on 126 pages for 'creation'.

Page 35/126 | < Previous Page | 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42  | Next Page >

• Kanban Tools Review

  - by GeekAgilistMercenary

  The first two sessions on Sunday were Collaboration and why it is so hard and the following, which was a perfect following session was on Kanban.  While in that second session two online Saas Style Tools were mentioned; AgileZen and Leankit.  I decided right then and there that I would throw together some first impressions and setup some sample projects.  I did this by setting up an account and creating the projects. Agile Zen Account Creation Setting up the initial account required an e-mail verification, which is understandable.  Within a few seconds it was mailed out and I was logged in. Setting Up the Kanban Board The initial setup of the board was pretty easy.  I maybe clicked around an extra few times, but overall everything I needed to use the tool was immediately available.  The representation of everything was very similar to what one expects in a real Kanban Board too.  This is a HUGE plus, especially if a team is smart and places this tool in a centrally viewable area to allow for visibility. Each of the board items is just like a post it, being blue, grey, green, pink, or one of another few colors.  Dragging them onto each swim lane on the board was flawless, making changes through the work super easy and intuitive. The other thing I really liked about AgileZen is that the Kanban Board had the swim lanes setup immediately.  One can change them, but when you know you immediately need a Ready Lane, Working Lane, and a Complete Lane it is nice to just have them right in front of you in the interface.  In addition, the Backlog is simply a little tab on the left hand side.  This is perfect for the Backlog Queue.  Out of the way, with the focus on the primary items. Once  I got the items onto the board I was easily able to get back to the actual work at hand versus playing around with the tool.  The fact that it was so easy to use, fast and easy UX, and overall a great layout put me back to work on things I needed to do versus sitting a playing with the tool.  That, in the end is the key to using these tools. LeanKit Kanban Account Creation Setting up the account got me straight into the online tool.  This I thought was pretty cool. Setting Up the Kanban Board Setting up the Kanban Board within Leankit was a bit of trouble.  There were multiple UX issues in regard to process and intuitiveness.  The Leankit basically forces one to design the whole board first, making no assumptions about how the board should look.  The swim lanes in my humble opinion should be setup immediately without any manipulation with the most common lanes;  ready, working, and complete. The other UX hiccup that I had a problem with is that as soon as I managed to get the swim lanes into place, I wanted to remove the redundant Backlog Lane.  The Backlog Lane, or Backlog Bucket should be somewhere that I accidentally added as a lane.  Then on top of that I screwed up and added an item inside the lane, which then prevented me from deleting the lane.  I had to go back out of the lane manipulation, remove the item, and then remove the excess lane.  Summary Leankit wasn't a bad interface, it just wasn't as good as AgileZen.  The AgileZen interface was just better UX design overall.  AgileZen also presents a much better user interface graphical design all together.  It is much closer to what the Kanban Board would look like if it were a physical Kanban Board.  Since one of the HUGE reasons for Kanban is to increase visibility, the fact the design is similar to what a real Kanban Board is actually a pretty big deal. This is an image (click for larger) that shows the two Kanban Boards side by side.  The one on the left is AgileZen and the right is Leankit. Original Entry

  Read the article

• Entity Framework 4, WCF &amp; Lazy Loading Tip

  - by Dane Morgridge

  If you are doing any work with Entity Framework and custom WCF services in EFv1, everything works great.  As soon as you jump to EFv4, you may find yourself getting odd errors that you can’t seem to catch.  The problem is almost always has something to do with the new lazy loading feature in Entity Framework 4.  With Entity Framework 1, you didn’t have lazy loading so this problem didn’t surface.  Assume I have a Person entity and an Address entity where there is a one-to-many relationship between Person and Address (Person has many Addresses). In Entity Framework 1 (or in EFv4 with lazy loading turned off), I would have to load the Address data by hand by either using the Include or Load Method: var people = context.People.Include("Addresses"); or people.Addresses.Load(); Lazy loading works when the first time the Person.Addresses collection is accessed: 1: var people = context.People.ToList(); 2:  3: // only person data is currently in memory 4:  5: foreach(var person in people) 6: { 7: // EF determines that no Address data has been loaded and lazy loads 8: int count = person.Addresses.Count(); 9: } 10:  Lazy loading has the useful (and sometimes not useful) feature of fetching data when requested.  It can make your life easier or it can make it a big pain.  So what does this have to do with WCF?  One word: Serialization. When you need to pass data over the wire with WCF, the data contract is serialized into either XML or binary depending on the binding you are using.  Well, if I am using lazy loading, the Person entity gets serialized and during that process, the Addresses collection is accessed.  When that happens, the Address data is lazy loaded.  Then the Address is serialized, and the Person property is accessed, and then also serialized and then the Addresses collection is accessed.  Now the second time through, lazy loading doesn’t kick in, but you can see the infinite loop caused by this process.  This is a problem with any serialization, but I personally found it trying to use WCF. The fix for this is to simply turn off lazy Loading.  This can be done at each call by using context options: context.ContextOptions.LazyLoadingEnabled = false; Turning lazy loading off will now allow your classes to be serialized properly.  Note, this is if you are using the standard Entity Framework classes.  If you are using POCO,  you will have to do something slightly different.  With POCO, the Entity Framework will create proxy classes by default that allow things like lazy loading to work with POCO.  This proxy basically creates a proxy object that is a full Entity Framework object that sits between the context and the POCO object.  When using POCO with WCF (or any serialization) just turning off lazy loading doesn’t cut it.  You have to turn off the proxy creation to ensure that your classes will serialize properly: context.ContextOptions.ProxyCreationEnabled = false; The nice thing is that you can do this on a call-by-call basis.  If you use a new context for each set of operations (which you should) then you can turn either lazy loading or proxy creation on and off as needed.

  Read the article

• Software Architecture verses Software Design

  Recently, I was asked what the differences between software architecture and software design are. At a very superficial level both architecture and design seem to mean relatively the same thing. However, if we examine both of these terms further we will find that they are in fact very different due to the level of details they encompass. Software Architecture can be defined as the essence of an application because it deals with high level concepts that do not include any details as to how they will be implemented. To me this gives stakeholders a view of a system or application as if someone was viewing the earth from outer space. At this distance only very basic elements of the earth can be detected like land, weather and water. As the viewer comes closer to earth the details in this view start to become more defined. Details about the earth’s surface will start to actually take form as well as mane made structures will be detected. The process of transitioning a view from outer space to inside our earth’s atmosphere is similar to how an architectural concept is transformed to an architectural design. From this vantage point stakeholders can start to see buildings and other structures as if they were looking out of a small plane window. This distance is still high enough to see a large area of the earth’s surface while still being able to see some details about the surface. This viewing point is very similar to the actual design process of an application in that it takes the very high level architectural concept or concepts and applies concrete design details to form a software design that encompasses the actual implementation details in the form of responsibilities and functions. Examples of these details include: interfaces, components, data, and connections. In review, software architecture deals with high level concepts without regard to any implementation details. Software design on the other hand takes high level concepts and applies concrete details so that software can be implemented. As part of the transition between software architecture to the creation of software design an evaluation on the architecture is recommended. There are several benefits to including this step as part of the transition process. It allows for projects to ensure that they are on the correct path as to meeting the stakeholder’s requirement goals, identifies possible cost savings and can be used to find missing or nonspecific requirements that cause ambiguity in a design. In the book “Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies”, they define key benefits to adding an architectural review process to ensure that an architecture is ready to move on to the design phase. Benefits to evaluating software architecture: Gathers all stakeholders to communicate about the project Goals are clearly defined in regards to the creation or validation of specific requirements Goals are prioritized so that when conflicts occur decisions will be made based on goal priority Defines a clear expectation of the architecture so that all stakeholders have a keen understanding of the project Ensures high quality documentation of the architecture Enables discoveries of architectural reuse  Increases the quality of architecture practices. I can remember a few projects that I worked on that could have really used an architectural review prior to being passed on to developers. This project was to create some new advertising space on the company’s website in order to sell space based on the location and some other criteria. I was one of the developer selected to lead this project and I was given a high level design concept and a long list of ever changing requirements due to the fact that sales department had no clear direction as to what exactly the project was going to do or how they were going to bill the clients once they actually agreed to purchase the Ad space. In my personal opinion IT should have pushed back to have the requirements further articulated instead of forcing programmers to code blindly attempting to build such an ambiguous project.  Unfortunately, we had to suffer with this project for about 4 months when it should have only taken 1.5 to complete due to the constantly changing and unclear requirements. References  Clements, P., Kazman, R., & Klein, M. (2002). Evaluating Software Architectures. Westford, Massachusetts: Courier Westford. 

  Read the article

• New Management Console in Java SE Advanced 8u20

  - by Erik Costlow-Oracle

  Java SE 8 update 20 is a new feature release designed to provide desktop administrators with better control of their managed systems. The release notes for 8u20 are available from the public JDK release notes page. This release is not a Critical Patch Update (CPU). I would like to call attention to two noteworthy features of Oracle Java SE Advanced, the commercially supported version of Java SE for enterprises that require both support and specialized tools. The new Advanced Management Console provides a way to monitor and understand client systems at scale. It allows organizations to track usage and more easily create and manage client configuration like Deployment Rule Sets (DRS). DRS can control execution of tracked applications as well as specify compatibility of which application should use which Java SE installation. The new MSI Installer integrates into various desktop management tools, making it easier to customize and roll out different Java SE versions. Advanced Management Console The Advanced Management Console is part of Java SE Advanced designed for desktop administrators, whose users need to run many different Java applications. It provides usage tracking for those Applet & Web Start applications to help identify them for guided DRS creation. DRS can then be verified against the tracked data, to ensure that end-users can run their application against the appropriate Java version with no prompts. Usage tracking also has a different definition for Java SE than it does for most software applications. Unlike most applications where usage can be determined by a simple run-count, Java is a platform used for launching other applications. This means that usage tracking must answer both "how often is this Java SE version used" and "what applications are launched by it." Usage Tracking One piece of Java SE Advanced is a centralized usage tracker. Simply placing a properties file on the client informs systems to report information to this usage tracker, so that the desktop administrator can better understand usage. Information is sent via UDP to prevent any delay on the client. The usage tracking server resides at a central location on the intranet to collect information from those clients. The information is stored in a normalized database for performance, meaning that a single usage tracker can handle a large number of clients. Guided Deployment Rule Sets Deployment Rule Sets were introduced in Java 7 update 40 (September 2013) in order to help administrators control security prompts and guide compatibility. A previous post, Deployment Rule Sets by Example, explains how to configure a rule set so that most applications run against the most secure version but a specific applet may run against the Java version that was current several years ago. There are a different set of questions that can be asked by a desktop administrator in a large or distributed firm: Where are the Java RIAs that our users need? Which RIA needs which Java version? Which users need which Java versions? How do I verify these answers once I have them? The guided deployment rule set creation uses usage tracker data to identify applications both by certificate hash and location. After creating the rules, a comparison tool exists to verify them against the tracked data: If you intend to run an RIA, is it green? If something specific should be blocked, is it red? This makes user-testing easier. MSI Installer The Windows Installer format (MSI) provides a number of benefits for desktop administrators that customize or manage software at scale. Unlike the basic installer that most users obtain from Java.com or OTN, this installer is built around customization and integration with various desktop management products like SCCM. Desktop administrators using the MSI installer can use every feature provided by the format, such as silent installs/upgrades, low-privileged installations, or self-repair capabilities Customers looking for Java SE Advanced can download the MSI installer through their My Oracle Support (MOS) account. Java SE Advanced The new features in Java SE Advanced make it easier for desktop administrators to identify and control client installations at scale. Administrators at organizations that want either the tools or associated commercial support should consider Java SE Advanced.

  Read the article

• Do MORE with WebCenter

  - by Michael Snow

  WEBCAST THURSDAY!! 03/22/12 Do you need to lower costs? Raise Productivity? Foster Innovation? Improve Online Engagement? But you’re still stuck with Documentum? Step away from the ledge – there is hope – let us help you. Top 4 Content Imperatives · Lower Costs - Reduce labor, maintenance fees, storage and electrical consumption · Raise Productivity - Automation and integration, communication, findability · Foster Innovation - Enable collaboration, expertise location · Improve Online Engagement – enable user-driven, dynamic marketing initiatives With the coming technology wave we see four content imperatives. Every organization has had to reduce costs, cost cutting has become a way of life. Everyone is working three jobs as positions are eliminated. And so we have to reduce labor, reduce maintenance, and reduce money we are wasting on things like storing content that is redundant or no longer useful. We also, to fill that gap, need to raise productivity. Knowledge workers represent the fastest growing segment of the workforce, accounting for 40%-75% of the employees at organizations in sectors like financial services, life sciences, healthcare and retail.  What’s more, their wages total 18 percent of the United States GDP. And so we can’t afford information systems that don’t let our top performers be the best they can be. We look to automate the content processes, provide ways to integrate that content into our processes, provide communication to make decisions, and to make content more findable so people can make the right decision and move the process forward. And really to get ourselves out of the current financial status, we can only cut costs so far. We have to innovate out of economic tough times – to find new products and new markets. And to enable the innovation process, we have to enable collaboration and expertise location. So much of innovation is about building on innovations that have come before. To solve problems, we have to be able to find what our organization has already created. We find that problems we need to solve have already been solved if we can find the right document, the right person. So we have to provide systems that enable us to stand on the shoulders of our organization’s accomplishments. Good content drives great marketing. Online engagement is growing as an absolute necessity for modern growing marketing organizations that require the business users be enabled for dynamic marketing content creation, updates and targeted content creation and management. Unfortunately – if you are currently stuck with Documentum, you are really lacking in your Web Experience Management capabilities. Documentum previously used FatWire for web publishing. Now FatWire is part of Oracle. Oracle provides powerful web engagement capabilities: Increase sales and loyalty by optimizing online engagement Create, manage and moderate contextually relevant, targeted and interactive online experiences Optimize customer engagement across, web, mobile and social channels Manage large scale multichannel global online presence with integration to enterprise applications Enable business users to control their content and make their own updates Publish content from native files – enable navigation of project documents, procedures, policy information Enable content display and updates from existing web applications – one click to drag and drop content management functionality So you get the ability to self-publish information and make it navigable, to move the process of publishing from IT to business users, and the ability to address a whole new area of user engagement with web experience management. So… if you are still stuck with Documentum and don’t know what to do – contact us – not only will Oracle help you step away from the ledge, but also with the MoveOff Documentum program, we are offering you a way – trade-in your Documentum licenses for a 100% credit on Oracle WebCenter. How’s that for a nice bonus? It’s time to stop maintaining Documentum, and to start innovating with Oracle WebCenter. Learn More Here! To learn more about what Oracle WebCenter can offer you today – join us for a webcast – your eyes will be opened to all that’s possible. Do More with WebCenter: Extend Beyond Content Management

  Read the article

• Stuck with Documentum Still? Do MORE with Oracle WebCenter!

  - by Michael Snow

  WEBCAST TODAY!! 03/22/12 Do you need to lower costs? Raise Productivity? Foster Innovation? Improve Online Engagement? But you’re still stuck with Documentum? Step away from the ledge – there is hope – let us help you. Top 4 Content Imperatives · Lower Costs - Reduce labor, maintenance fees, storage and electrical consumption · Raise Productivity - Automation and integration, communication, findability · Foster Innovation - Enable collaboration, expertise location · Improve Online Engagement – enable user-driven, dynamic marketing initiatives With the coming technology wave we see four content imperatives. Every organization has had to reduce costs, cost cutting has become a way of life. Everyone is working three jobs as positions are eliminated. And so we have to reduce labor, reduce maintenance, and reduce money we are wasting on things like storing content that is redundant or no longer useful. We also, to fill that gap, need to raise productivity. Knowledge workers represent the fastest growing segment of the workforce, accounting for 40%-75% of the employees at organizations in sectors like financial services, life sciences, healthcare and retail.  What’s more, their wages total 18 percent of the United States GDP. And so we can’t afford information systems that don’t let our top performers be the best they can be. We look to automate the content processes, provide ways to integrate that content into our processes, provide communication to make decisions, and to make content more findable so people can make the right decision and move the process forward. And really to get ourselves out of the current financial status, we can only cut costs so far. We have to innovate out of economic tough times – to find new products and new markets. And to enable the innovation process, we have to enable collaboration and expertise location. So much of innovation is about building on innovations that have come before. To solve problems, we have to be able to find what our organization has already created. We find that problems we need to solve have already been solved if we can find the right document, the right person. So we have to provide systems that enable us to stand on the shoulders of our organization’s accomplishments. Good content drives great marketing. Online engagement is growing as an absolute necessity for modern growing marketing organizations that require the business users be enabled for dynamic marketing content creation, updates and targeted content creation and management. Unfortunately – if you are currently stuck with Documentum, you are really lacking in your Web Experience Management capabilities. Documentum previously used FatWire for web publishing. Now FatWire is part of Oracle. Oracle provides powerful web engagement capabilities: Increase sales and loyalty by optimizing online engagement Create, manage and moderate contextually relevant, targeted and interactive online experiences Optimize customer engagement across, web, mobile and social channels Manage large scale multichannel global online presence with integration to enterprise applications Enable business users to control their content and make their own updates Publish content from native files – enable navigation of project documents, procedures, policy information Enable content display and updates from existing web applications – one click to drag and drop content management functionality So you get the ability to self-publish information and make it navigable, to move the process of publishing from IT to business users, and the ability to address a whole new area of user engagement with web experience management. So… if you are still stuck with Documentum and don’t know what to do – contact us – not only will Oracle help you step away from the ledge, but also with the MoveOff Documentum program, we are offering you a way – trade-in your Documentum licenses for a 100% credit on Oracle WebCenter. How’s that for a nice bonus? It’s time to stop maintaining Documentum, and to start innovating with Oracle WebCenter. Learn More Here! To learn more about what Oracle WebCenter can offer you today – join us for a webcast – your eyes will be opened to all that’s possible. Do More with WebCenter: Extend Beyond Content Management

  Read the article

• How to Create SharePoint List and Insert List Item programmatically from a Windows Forms Application.

  - by Michael M. Bangoy

  In this post I’m going to demonstrate how to create SharePoint List and also Insert Items on the List from a Windows Forms Application. 1. Open Visual Studio and create a new project. On the project template select Windows Form Application under C#. 2. In order to communicate with Sharepoint from a Windows Forms Application we need to add the 2 Sharepoint Client DLL located in c:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\14\ISAPI.  3. Select the Microsoft.Sharepoint.Client.dll and Microsoft.Sharepoint.Client.Runtime.dll. (Your solution should look like the one below) 4. Open the Form1 in design view and from the Toolbox menu add a button on the form surface. Your form should look like the one below. 5. Double click the button to open the code view. Add Using statement to reference the Sharepoint Client Library then create method for the Create List. Your code should like the codes below. using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.ComponentModel; using System.Data; using System.Drawing; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.Security; using System.Windows.Forms; using SP = Microsoft.SharePoint.Client; namespace ClientObjectModel {     public partial class Form1 : Form     {         // url of the Sharepoint site         const string _context = "urlofthesharepointsite";         public Form1()         {             InitializeComponent();         }         private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)         {                    }         private void cmdcreate_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)         {             try             {                 // declare the ClientContext Object                 SP.ClientContext _clientcontext = new SP.ClientContext(_context);                 SP.Web _site = _clientcontext.Web;                 // declare a ListCreationInfo                 SP.ListCreationInformation _listcreationinfo = new SP.ListCreationInformation();                 // set the Title and the Template of the List to be created                 _listcreationinfo.Title = "NewListFromCOM";                 _listcreationinfo.TemplateType = (int)SP.ListTemplateType.GenericList;                 // Call the add method to the ListCreatedInfo                 SP.List _list = _site.Lists.Add(_listcreationinfo);                 // Add Description field to the List                 SP.Field _Description = _list.Fields.AddFieldAsXml(@"                                     <Field Type='Text'                                         DisplayName='Description'>                                     </Field>", true, SP.AddFieldOptions.AddToDefaultContentType);                 // declare the List item Creation object for creating List Item                 SP.ListItemCreationInformation _itemcreationinfo = new SP.ListItemCreationInformation();                 // call the additem method of the list to insert a new List Item                 SP.ListItem _item = _list.AddItem(_itemcreationinfo);                 _item["Title"] = "New Item from Client Object Model";                 _item["Description"] = "This item was added by a Windows Forms Application";                 // call the update method                 _item.Update();                 // execute the query of the clientcontext                 _clientcontext.ExecuteQuery();                 // dispose the clientcontext                 _clientcontext.Dispose();                 MessageBox.Show("List Creation Successfull");             }             catch(Exception ex)             {                 MessageBox.Show("Error creating list" + ex.ToString());             }          }     } } 6. Hit F5 to run the application. A message will be displayed on the screen if the operation is successful and also if it fails. 7. To make that the operation of our Windows Form Application has really created the List and Inserted an item on it. Let’s open our SharePoint site. Once the SharePoint is open click on the Site Actions then View All Site Content. 7. Click the List to open it and check if an Item is inserted. That’s it. Hope this helps.

  Read the article

• Process Power to the People that Create Engagement

  - by Michael Snow

  Organizations often speak about their engagement problems as if the problem is the people they are trying to engage - employees,  partners, customers and citizens.  The reality of most engagement problems is that the processes put in place to engage are impersonal, inflexible, unintuitive, and often completely ignorant of the population they are trying to serve. Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Delight? How appropriate during this short week of the US Independence Day Holiday that we're focusing on People, Process and Engagement. As we celebrate this holiday in the US and the historic independence we gained (sorry Brits!) - it's interesting to think back to 1776 to the creation of that pivotal document, the Declaration of Independence. What tremendous pressure to create an engaging document and founding experience they must have felt. "On June 11, 1776, in anticipation of the impending vote for independence from Great Britain, the Continental Congress appointed five men — Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert Livingston — to write a declaration that would make clear to people everywhere why this break from Great Britain was both necessary and inevitable. The committee then appointed Jefferson to draft a statement. Jefferson produced a "fair copy" of his draft declaration, which became the basic text of his "original Rough draught." The text was first submitted to Adams, then Franklin, and finally to the other two members of the committee. Before the committee submitted the declaration to Congress on June 28, they made forty-seven emendations to the document. During the ensuing congressional debates of July 1-4, 1776, Congress adopted thirty-nine further revisions to the committee draft. (http://www.constitution.org) If anything was an attempt for engaging the hearts and minds of the 13 Colonies at the time, this document certainly succeeded in its mission. ...Their tools at the time were pen and ink and parchment. Although the final document would later be typeset with lead type for a printing press to distribute to the colonies, all of the original drafts were hand written. And today's enterprise complains about using "Review and Track Changes" at times.  Can you imagine the manual revision control process? or lack thereof?  Collaborative process? Time delays? Would  implementing a better process have helped our founding fathers collaborate better? Declaration of Independence rough draft below. One of many during the creation process. Great comparison across multiple versions of the document here. (from http://www.ushistory.org/): While you may not be creating a new independent nation, getting your employees to engage is crucial to your success as a company in today's world. Oracle WebCenter provides the tools that power engagement. Employees that have better tools for communication, collaboration and getting their job done are more engaged employees. Better engaged employees create more engaged customers and partners. 12.00 Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 -"/ /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}

  Read the article

• Working with Analytic Workflow Manager (AWM) - Part 8 Cube Metadata Analysis

  - by Mohan Ramanuja

  CUBE SIZEselect dbal.owner||'.'||substr(dbal.table_name,4) awname, sum(dbas.bytes)/1024/1024 as mb, dbas.tablespace_name from dba_lobs dbal, dba_segments dbas where dbal.column_name = 'AWLOB' and dbal.segment_name = dbas.segment_name group by dbal.owner, dbal.table_name, dbas.tablespace_name order by dbal.owner, dbal.table_name SESSION RESOURCES select vses.username||':'||vsst.sid username, vstt.name, max(vsst.value) valuefrom v$sesstat vsst, v$statname vstt, v$session vseswhere vstt.statistic# = vsst.statistic# and vsst.sid = vses.sid andVSES.USERNAME LIKE ('ATTRIBDW_OWN') ANDvstt.name in ('session pga memory', 'session pga memory max', 'session uga memory','session uga memory max', 'session cursor cache count', 'session cursor cache hits', 'session stored procedure space', 'opened cursors current', 'opened cursors cumulative') andvses.username is not null group by vsst.sid, vses.username, vstt.name order by vsst.sid, vses.username, vstt.name OLAP PGA USE select 'OLAP Pages Occupying: '|| round((((select sum(nvl(pool_size,1)) from v$aw_calc)) / (select value from v$pgastat where name = 'total PGA inuse')),2)*100||'%' info from dual union select 'Total PGA Inuse Size: '||value/1024||' KB' info from v$pgastat where name = 'total PGA inuse' union select 'Total OLAP Page Size: '|| round(sum(nvl(pool_size,1))/1024,0)||' KB' info from v$aw_calc order by info desc OLAP PGA USAGE PER USER select vs.username, vs.sid, round(pga_used_mem/1024/1024,2)||' MB' pga_used, round(pga_max_mem/1024/1024,2)||' MB' pga_max, round(pool_size/1024/1024,2)||' MB' olap_pp, round(100*(pool_hits-pool_misses)/pool_hits,2) || '%' olap_ratio from v$process vp, v$session vs, v$aw_calc va where session_id=vs.sid and addr = paddr CUBE LOADING SCRIPT REM The 'set define off' statement is needed only if running this script through SQLPlus.REM If you are using another tool to run this script, the line below may be commented out.set define offBEGIN  DBMS_CUBE.BUILD(    'VALIDATE  ATTRIBDW_OWN.CURRENCY USING  (    LOAD NO SYNCH,    COMPILE SORT  ),  ATTRIBDW_OWN.ACCOUNT USING  (    LOAD NO SYNCH,    COMPILE SORT  ),  ATTRIBDW_OWN.DATEDIM USING  (    LOAD NO SYNCH,    COMPILE SORT  ),  ATTRIBDW_OWN.CUSIP USING  (    LOAD NO SYNCH,    COMPILE SORT  ),  ATTRIBDW_OWN.ACCOUNTRETURN',    'CCCCC', -- refresh methodfalse, -- refresh after errors    0, -- parallelismtrue, -- atomic refreshtrue, -- automatic orderfalse); -- add dimensionsEND;/BEGIN  DBMS_CUBE.BUILD(    '  ATTRIBDW_OWN.CURRENCY USING  (    LOAD NO SYNCH,    COMPILE SORT  ),  ATTRIBDW_OWN.ACCOUNT USING  (    LOAD NO SYNCH,    COMPILE SORT  ),  ATTRIBDW_OWN.DATEDIM USING  (    LOAD NO SYNCH,    COMPILE SORT  ),  ATTRIBDW_OWN.CUSIP USING  (    LOAD NO SYNCH,    COMPILE SORT  ),  ATTRIBDW_OWN.ACCOUNTRETURN',    'CCCCC', -- refresh methodfalse, -- refresh after errors    0, -- parallelismtrue, -- atomic refreshtrue, -- automatic orderfalse); -- add dimensionsEND;/ VISUALIZATION OBJECT - AW$ATTRIBDW_OWN  CREATE TABLE "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."AW$ATTRIBDW_OWN"        (            "PS#"    NUMBER(10,0),            "GEN#"   NUMBER(10,0),            "EXTNUM" NUMBER(8,0),            "AWLOB" BLOB,            "OBJNAME"  VARCHAR2(256 BYTE),            "PARTNAME" VARCHAR2(256 BYTE)        )        PCTFREE 10 PCTUSED 40 INITRANS 4 MAXTRANS 255 STORAGE        (            BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT        )        TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" LOB        (            "AWLOB"        )        STORE AS SECUREFILE        (            TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" DISABLE STORAGE IN ROW CHUNK 8192 RETENTION MIN 1 CACHE NOCOMPRESS KEEP_DUPLICATES STORAGE( BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT)        )        PARTITION BY RANGE        (            "GEN#"        )        SUBPARTITION BY HASH        (            "PS#",            "EXTNUM"        )        SUBPARTITIONS 8        (            PARTITION "PTN1" VALUES LESS THAN (1) PCTFREE 10 PCTUSED 40 INITRANS 4 MAXTRANS 255 STORAGE( BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS SECUREFILE ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" DISABLE STORAGE IN ROW CHUNK 8192 RETENTION MIN 1 CACHE READS LOGGING NOCOMPRESS KEEP_DUPLICATES STORAGE( BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT)) ( SUBPARTITION "SYS_SUBP661" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_SUBP662" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_SUBP663" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_SUBP664" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_SUBP665" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION            "SYS_SUBP666" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_SUBP667" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_SUBP668" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) ,            PARTITION "PTNN" VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE) PCTFREE 10 PCTUSED 40 INITRANS 4 MAXTRANS 255 STORAGE( BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS SECUREFILE ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" DISABLE STORAGE IN ROW CHUNK 8192 RETENTION MIN 1 CACHE NOCOMPRESS KEEP_DUPLICATES STORAGE( BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT)) ( SUBPARTITION "SYS_SUBP669" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_SUBP670" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_SUBP671" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_SUBP672" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_SUBP673" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION            "SYS_SUBP674" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_SUBP675" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_SUBP676" LOB ("AWLOB") STORE AS ( TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" )        ) ;CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."ATTRIBDW_OWN_I$" ON "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."AW$ATTRIBDW_OWN"    (        "PS#", "GEN#", "EXTNUM"    )    PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 4 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS STORAGE    (        INITIAL 1048576 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT    )    TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ;CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."SYS_IL0000406980C00004$$" ON "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."AW$ATTRIBDW_OWN"    (        PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255 STORAGE( BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" LOCAL (PARTITION "SYS_IL_P711" PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255 STORAGE( BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT) ( SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP695" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP696" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP697" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP698" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP699" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP700" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP701" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP702" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) , PARTITION "SYS_IL_P712" PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255 STORAGE( BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT) ( SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP703" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP704" TABLESPACE        "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP705" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP706" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP707" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP708" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP709" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" , SUBPARTITION "SYS_IL_SUBP710" TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ) ) PARALLEL (DEGREE 0 INSTANCES 0) ; CUBE BUILD LOG  CREATE TABLE "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_BUILD_LOG"        (            "BUILD_ID"          NUMBER,            "SLAVE_NUMBER"      NUMBER,            "STATUS"            VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),            "COMMAND"           VARCHAR2(25 BYTE),            "BUILD_OBJECT"      VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),            "BUILD_OBJECT_TYPE" VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),            "OUTPUT" CLOB,            "AW"            VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),            "OWNER"         VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),            "PARTITION"     VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),            "SCHEDULER_JOB" VARCHAR2(100 BYTE),            "TIME" TIMESTAMP (6)WITH TIME ZONE,        "BUILD_SCRIPT" CLOB,        "BUILD_TYPE"            VARCHAR2(22 BYTE),        "COMMAND_DEPTH"         NUMBER(2,0),        "BUILD_SUB_OBJECT"      VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),        "REFRESH_METHOD"        VARCHAR2(1 BYTE),        "SEQ_NUMBER"            NUMBER,        "COMMAND_NUMBER"        NUMBER,        "IN_BRANCH"             NUMBER(1,0),        "COMMAND_STATUS_NUMBER" NUMBER,        "BUILD_NAME"            VARCHAR2(100 BYTE)        )        SEGMENT CREATION IMMEDIATE PCTFREE 10 PCTUSED 40 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255 NOCOMPRESS LOGGING STORAGE        (            INITIAL 1048576 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT        )        TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" LOB        (            "OUTPUT"        )        STORE AS BASICFILE        (            TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ENABLE STORAGE IN ROW CHUNK 8192 RETENTION NOCACHE LOGGING STORAGE(INITIAL 1048576 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT)        )        LOB        (            "BUILD_SCRIPT"        )        STORE AS BASICFILE        (            TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ENABLE STORAGE IN ROW CHUNK 8192 RETENTION NOCACHE LOGGING STORAGE(INITIAL 1048576 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT)        ) ;CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."SYS_IL0000407294C00013$$" ON "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_BUILD_LOG"    (        PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 STORAGE(INITIAL 1048576 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" PARALLEL (DEGREE 0 INSTANCES 0) ;CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."SYS_IL0000407294C00007$$" ON "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_BUILD_LOG" ( PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 STORAGE(INITIAL 1048576 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" PARALLEL (DEGREE 0 INSTANCES 0) ; CUBE DIMENSION COMPILE  CREATE TABLE "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_DIMENSION_COMPILE"        (            "ID"               NUMBER,            "SEQ_NUMBER"       NUMBER,            "ERROR#"           NUMBER(8,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,            "ERROR_MESSAGE"    VARCHAR2(2000 BYTE),            "DIMENSION"        VARCHAR2(100 BYTE),            "DIMENSION_MEMBER" VARCHAR2(100 BYTE),            "MEMBER_ANCESTOR"  VARCHAR2(100 BYTE),            "HIERARCHY1"       VARCHAR2(100 BYTE),            "HIERARCHY2"       VARCHAR2(100 BYTE),            "ERROR_CONTEXT" CLOB        )        SEGMENT CREATION DEFERRED PCTFREE 10 PCTUSED 40 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255 NOCOMPRESS LOGGING TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" LOB        (            "ERROR_CONTEXT"        )        STORE AS BASICFILE        (            TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ENABLE STORAGE IN ROW CHUNK 8192 RETENTION NOCACHE LOGGING        ) ;COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_DIMENSION_COMPILE"."ID"IS    'Current operation ID';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_DIMENSION_COMPILE"."SEQ_NUMBER"IS    'Cube build log sequence number';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_DIMENSION_COMPILE"."ERROR#"IS    'Error number being reported';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_DIMENSION_COMPILE"."ERROR_MESSAGE"IS    'Error text being reported';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_DIMENSION_COMPILE"."DIMENSION"IS    'Name of dimension being compiled';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_DIMENSION_COMPILE"."DIMENSION_MEMBER"IS    'Problem dimension member';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_DIMENSION_COMPILE"."MEMBER_ANCESTOR"IS    'Problem dimension member''s parent';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_DIMENSION_COMPILE"."HIERARCHY1"IS    'First hierarchy involved in error';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_DIMENSION_COMPILE"."HIERARCHY2"IS    'Second hierarchy involved in error';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_DIMENSION_COMPILE"."ERROR_CONTEXT"IS    'Extra information for error';    COMMENT ON TABLE "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_DIMENSION_COMPILE"IS    'Cube dimension compile log';CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."SYS_IL0000407307C00010$$" ON "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_DIMENSION_COMPILE"    (        PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 STORAGE( INITIAL 1048576 NEXT 1048576 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" PARALLEL (DEGREE 0 INSTANCES 0) ; CUBE OPERATING LOG  CREATE TABLE "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"        (            "INST_ID"    NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,            "SID"        NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,            "SERIAL#"    NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,            "USER#"      NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,            "SQL_ID"     VARCHAR2(13 BYTE),            "JOB"        NUMBER,            "ID"         NUMBER,            "PARENT_ID"  NUMBER,            "SEQ_NUMBER" NUMBER,            "TIME" TIMESTAMP (6)WITH TIME ZONE NOT NULL ENABLE,        "LOG_LEVEL"    NUMBER(4,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,        "DEPTH"        NUMBER(4,0),        "OPERATION"    VARCHAR2(15 BYTE) NOT NULL ENABLE,        "SUBOPERATION" VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),        "STATUS"       VARCHAR2(10 BYTE) NOT NULL ENABLE,        "NAME"         VARCHAR2(20 BYTE) NOT NULL ENABLE,        "VALUE"        VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE),        "DETAILS" CLOB        )        SEGMENT CREATION IMMEDIATE PCTFREE 10 PCTUSED 40 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255 NOCOMPRESS LOGGING STORAGE        (            INITIAL 1048576 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT        )        TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" LOB        (            "DETAILS"        )        STORE AS BASICFILE        (            TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ENABLE STORAGE IN ROW CHUNK 8192 RETENTION NOCACHE LOGGING STORAGE(INITIAL 1048576 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT)        ) ;COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."INST_ID"IS    'Instance ID';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."SID"IS    'Session ID';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."SERIAL#"IS    'Session serial#';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."USER#"IS    'User ID';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."SQL_ID"IS    'Executing SQL statement ID';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."JOB"IS    'Identifier of job';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."ID"IS    'Current operation ID';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."PARENT_ID"IS    'Parent operation ID';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."SEQ_NUMBER"IS    'Cube build log sequence number';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."TIME"IS    'Time of record';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."LOG_LEVEL"IS    'Verbosity level of record';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."DEPTH"IS    'Nesting depth of record';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."OPERATION"IS    'Current operation';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."SUBOPERATION"IS    'Current suboperation';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."STATUS"IS    'Status of current operation';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."NAME"IS    'Name of record';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."VALUE"IS    'Value of record';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"."DETAILS"IS    'Extra information for record';    COMMENT ON TABLE "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"IS    'Cube operations log';CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."SYS_IL0000407301C00018$$" ON "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG"    (        PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 STORAGE(INITIAL 1048576 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" PARALLEL (DEGREE 0 INSTANCES 0) ; CUBE REJECTED RECORDS CREATE TABLE "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_REJECTED_RECORDS"        (            "ID"            NUMBER,            "SEQ_NUMBER"    NUMBER,            "ERROR#"        NUMBER(8,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,            "ERROR_MESSAGE" VARCHAR2(2000 BYTE),            "RECORD#"       NUMBER(38,0),            "SOURCE_ROW" ROWID,            "REJECTED_RECORD" CLOB        )        SEGMENT CREATION IMMEDIATE PCTFREE 10 PCTUSED 40 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255 NOCOMPRESS LOGGING STORAGE        (            INITIAL 1048576 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT        )        TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" LOB        (            "REJECTED_RECORD"        )        STORE AS BASICFILE        (            TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" ENABLE STORAGE IN ROW CHUNK 8192 RETENTION NOCACHE LOGGING STORAGE(INITIAL 1048576 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT)        ) ;COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_REJECTED_RECORDS"."ID"IS    'Current operation ID';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_REJECTED_RECORDS"."SEQ_NUMBER"IS    'Cube build log sequence number';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_REJECTED_RECORDS"."ERROR#"IS    'Error number being reported';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_REJECTED_RECORDS"."ERROR_MESSAGE"IS    'Error text being reported';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_REJECTED_RECORDS"."RECORD#"IS    'Rejected record number';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_REJECTED_RECORDS"."SOURCE_ROW"IS    'Rejected record''s ROWID';    COMMENT ON COLUMN "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_REJECTED_RECORDS"."REJECTED_RECORD"IS    'Rejected record copy';    COMMENT ON TABLE "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_REJECTED_RECORDS"IS    'Cube rejected records log';CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."SYS_IL0000407304C00007$$" ON "ATTRIBDW_OWN"."CUBE_REJECTED_RECORDS"    (        PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 STORAGE(INITIAL 1048576 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT) TABLESPACE "ATTRIBDW_DATA" PARALLEL (DEGREE 0 INSTANCES 0) ;

  Read the article

• Implementing Service Level Agreements in Enterprise Manager 12c for Oracle Packaged Applications

  - by Anand Akela

  Contributed by Eunjoo Lee, Product Manager, Oracle Enterprise Manager. Service Level Management, or SLM, is a key tool in the proactive management of any Oracle Packaged Application (e.g., E-Business Suite, Siebel, PeopleSoft, JD Edwards E1, Fusion Apps, etc.). The benefits of SLM are that administrators can utilize representative Application transactions, which are constantly and automatically running behind the scenes, to verify that all of the key application and technology components of an Application are available and performing to expectations. A single transaction can verify the availability and performance of the underlying Application Tech Stack in a much more efficient manner than by monitoring the same underlying targets individually. In this article, we’ll be demonstrating SLM using Siebel Applications, but the same tools and processes apply to any of the Package Applications mentioned above. In this demonstration, we will log into the Siebel Application, navigate to the Contacts View, update a contact phone record, and then log-out. This transaction exposes availability and performance metrics of multiple Siebel Servers, multiple Components and Component Groups, and the Siebel Database - in a single unified manner. We can then monitor and manage these transactions like any other target in EM 12c, including placing pro-active alerts on them if the transaction is either unavailable or is not performing to required levels. The first step in the SLM process is recording the Siebel transaction. The following screenwatch demonstrates how to record Siebel transaction using an EM tool called “OpenScript”. A completed recording is called a “Synthetic Transaction”. The second step in the SLM process is uploading the Synthetic Transaction into EM 12c, and creating Generic Service Tests. We can create a Generic Service Test to execute our synthetic transactions at regular intervals to evaluate the performance of various business flows. As these transactions are running periodically, it is possible to monitor the performance of the Siebel Application by evaluating the performance of the synthetic transactions. The process of creating a Generic Service Test is detailed in the next screenwatch. EM 12c provides a guided workflow for all of the key creation steps, including configuring the Service Test, uploading of the Synthetic Test, determining the frequency of the Service Test, establishing beacons, and selecting performance and usage metrics, just to name a few. The third and final step in the SLM process is the creation of Service Level Agreements (SLA). Service Level Agreements allow Administrators to utilize the previously created Service Tests to specify expected service levels for Application availability, performance, and usage. SLAs can be created for different time periods and for different Service Tests. This last screenwatch demonstrates the process of creating an SLA, as well as highlights the Dashboards and Reports that Administrators can use to monitor Service Test results. Hopefully, this article provides you with a good start point for creating Service Level Agreements for your E-Business Suite, Siebel, PeopleSoft, JD Edwards E1, or Fusion Applications. Enterprise Manager Cloud Control 12c, with the Application Management Suites, represents a quick and easy way to implement Service Level Management capabilities at customer sites. Stay Connected: Twitter |  Face book |  You Tube |  Linked in |  Google+ |  Newsletter

  Read the article

• My architecture has a problem with views that required information from different objects. How can I solve this?

  - by Oscar

  I am building an architecture like this: These are my SW layers ______________ | | | Views | |______________| ______________ | | |Business Logic| |______________| ______________ | | | Repository | |______________| My views are going to generate my HTML to be sent to the user Business logic is where all the business logics are Repository is a layer to access the DB My idea is that the repository uses entities (that are basically the representation of the tables, in order to perform DB queries. The layers communicate between themselves using Business Objects, that are objects that represent the real-world-object itself. They can contain business rules and methods. The views build/use DTOs, they are basically objects that have the information required to be shown on the screen. They expect also this kind of object on actions and, before calling the business logic, they create BO. First question: what is your overall feeling about this architecture? I've used similar architecture for some projects and I always got this problem: If my view has this list to show : Student1, age, course, Date Enrolled, Already paid? It has information from different BO. How do you think one should build the structure? These were the alternatives I could think of: The view layer could call the methods to get the student, then the course it studies, then the payment information. This would cause a lot of DB accesses and my view would have the knowledge about how to act to generate this information. This just seems wrong for me. I could have an "adapter object", that has the required information (a class that would have a properties Student, Course and Payment). But I would required one adapter object for each similar case, this may get very bad for big projects. I still don't like them. Would you have ideas? How would you change the architecture to avoid this kind of problems? @Rory: I read the CQRS and I don't think this suits my needs. As taken from a link references in your link Before describing the details of CQRS we need to understand the two main driving forces behind it: collaboration and staleness That means: many different actors using the same object (collaboration) and once data has been shown to a user, that same data may have been changed by another actor – it is stale (staleness). My problem is that I want to show to the user information from different BO, so I would need to receive them from the service layer. How can my service layer assemble and deliver this information? Edit to @AndrewM: Yes, you understood it correctly, the original idea was to have the view layer to build the BOs, but you have a very nice point about the creation of the BO inside the business layers. Assuming I follow your advice and move the creation logic inside the business layer, my business layer interface would contain the DTOs, for instance public void foo(MyDTO object) But as far as I understand, the DTO is tightly coupled to each view, so it would not be reusable by a second view. In order to use it, the second view would need to build a specific DTO from a specific view or I would have to duplicate the code in the business layer. Is this correct or am I missing something?

  Read the article

• Procedual level generation for a platformer game (tilebased) using player physics

  - by Notbad

  I have been searching for information about how to build a 2d world generator (tilebased) for a platformer game I am developing. The levels should look like dungeons with a ceiling and a floor and they will have a high probability of being just made of horizontal rooms but sometimes they can have exits to a top/down room. Here is an example of what I would like to achieve. I'm refering only to the caves part. I know level design won't be that great when generated but I think it is possible to have something good enough for people to enjoy the procedural maps (Note: Supermetrod Spoiler!): http://www.snesmaps.com/maps/SuperMetroid/SuperMetroidMapNorfair.html Well, after spending some time thinking about this I have some ideas to create the maps that I would like to share with you: 1) I have read about celular automatas and I would like to use them to carve the rooms but instead of carving just a tile at once I would like to carve full columns of tiles. Of course this carving system will have some restrictions like how many tiles must be left for the roof and the ceiling, etc... This way I could get much cleaner rooms than using the ussual automata. 2) I want some branching into the rooms. It will have little probability to happen but I definitely want it. Thinking about carving I came to the conclusion that I could be using some sort of path creation algorithm that the carving system would follow to create a path in the rooms. This could be more noticiable if we make the carving system to carve columns with the height of a corridor or with the height of a wide room (this will be added to the system as a param). This way at some point I could spawn a new automa beside the main one to create braches. This new automata should play side by side with the first one to create dead ends, islands (both paths created by the automatas meet at some point or lead to the same room. It would be too long to explain here all the tests I have done, etc... just will try to summarize the problems to see if anyone could bring some light to solve them (I don't mind sharing my successes but I think they aren't too relevant): 1) Zone reachability: How can I make sure that the player will be able to reach all zones I created (mainly when branches happen or vertical rooms are created). When branches are created I have to make sure that there will be a way to get onto the new created branch. I mean a bifurcation that the player could follow. Player will follow the main path or jump to a platform to get onto the other way). On the other hand if an island is created by the meeting of both branches I need to make sure the player will be able to get onto the island too. 2) When a branch is created and corridors are generated for each branch how can I make then both merge or repel to create an island or just make them separated corridors. 3) When I create a branch and an island is created becasue both corridors merge at somepoint or they lead to the same room, is there any way to detect this and randomize where to create the needed platforms to get onto the created isle? This platforms could be created at the start of the island or at the end. I guess part of the problem could be solved using some sort of graph following the created paths but I'm a bit lost in this sea of precedural content creation :). On the other hand I don't expect a solution to the problem but some information to get me moving forward again. Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• F# Objects &ndash; Integration with the other .Net Languages &ndash; Part 2

  - by MarkPearl

  So in part one of my posting I covered the real basics of object creation. Today I will hopefully dig a little deeper… My expert F# book brings up an interesting point – properties in F# are just syntactic sugar for method calls. This makes sense… for instance assume I had the following object with the property exposed called Firstname. type Person(Firstname : string, Lastname : string) = member v.Firstname = Firstname I could extend the Firstname property with the following code and everything would be hunky dory… type Person(Firstname : string, Lastname : string) = member v.Firstname = Console.WriteLine("Side Effect") Firstname   All that this would do is each time I use the property Firstname, I would see the side effect printed to the screen saying “Side Effect”. Member methods have a very similar look & feel to properties, in fact the only difference really is that you declare that parameters are being passed in. type Person(Firstname : string, Lastname : string) = member v.FullName(middleName) = Firstname + " " + middleName + " " + Lastname   In the code above, FullName requires the parameter middleName, and if viewed from another project in C# would show as a method and not a property. Precomputation Optimizations Okay, so something that is obvious once you think of it but that poses an interesting side effect of mutable value holders is pre-computation of results. All it is, is a slight difference in code but can result in quite a huge saving in performance. Basically pre-computation means you would not need to compute a value every time a method is called – but could perform the computation at the creation of the object (I hope I have got it right). In a way I battle to differentiate this from lazy evaluation but I will show an example to explain the principle. Let me try and show an example to illustrate the principle… assume the following F# module namespace myNamespace open System module myMod = let Add val1 val2 = Console.WriteLine("Compute") val1 + val2 type MathPrecompute(val1 : int, val2 : int) = let precomputedsum = Add val1 val2 member v.Sum = precomputedsum type MathNormalCompute(val1 : int, val2 : int) = member v.Sum = Add val1 val2 Now assume you have a C# console app that makes use of the objects with code similar to the following… using System; using myNamespace; namespace CSharpTest { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Constructing Objects"); var myObj1 = new myMod.MathNormalCompute(10, 11); var myObj2 = new myMod.MathPrecompute(10, 11); Console.WriteLine(""); Console.WriteLine("Normal Compute Sum..."); Console.WriteLine(myObj1.Sum); Console.WriteLine(myObj1.Sum); Console.WriteLine(myObj1.Sum); Console.WriteLine(""); Console.WriteLine("Pre Compute Sum..."); Console.WriteLine(myObj2.Sum); Console.WriteLine(myObj2.Sum); Console.WriteLine(myObj2.Sum); Console.ReadKey(); } } } The output when running the console application would be as follows…. You will notice with the normal compute object that the system would call the Add function every time the method was called. With the Precompute object it only called the compute method when the object was created. Subtle, but something that could lead to major performance benefits. So… this post has gone off in a slight tangent but still related to F# objects.

  Read the article

• COM Object Clean Up

  - by Reggie McCray

  What is the difference between the two lines of code below: CComPtr< IInterface > m_interface; IInterface* m_interface; I know that CComPtr help eliminate memory leaks, but I am getting inconsistent results. When declaring the pointer with CComPtr< IInterface > m_interface; and using the interface in my C# code there are no errors, however using the Interface in VC++ I get an unhandled exception error, even if I comment out the instance creation of IInterface. I am pretty sure the problem is in here somewhere: STDMETHODIMP CSomeClass::get_IClass(IClass** var) { return m_class_var->QueryInterface(var); } STDMETHODIMP CSomeClass::putref_IClass(IClass* var) { m_class_var = var; return S_OK; } When I declare the interface pointer with: IInterface* m_interface; I get a RPC_E_SERVERFAULT error when testing the Interface in C# and have to explicitly call GC.Collect() to avoid the error being thrown after instantiation of a few objects. When testing the Interface in VC++ the error is consistent however when it occurs is different. If I comment out the instance creation of IInterface the code runs fine, however when I try to create an instance I get same error as before, just a vague unhandled exception error. What am I doing wrong here?

  Read the article

• LINQ(2 SQL) Insert Multiple Tables Question

  - by Refracted Paladin

  I have 3 tables. A primary EmploymentPlan table with PK GUID EmploymentPlanID and 2 FK's GUID PrevocServicesID & GUID JobDevelopmentServicesID. There are of course other fields, almost exclusively varchar(). Then the 2 secondary tables with the corresponding PK to the primary's FK's. I am trying to write the LINQ INSERT Method and am struggling with the creation of the keys. Say I have a method like below. Is that correct? Will that even work? Should I have seperate methods for each? Also, when INSERTING I didn't think I needed to provide the PK for a table. It is auto-generated, no? Thanks, public static void InsertEmploymentPlan(int planID, Guid employmentQuestionnaireID, string user, bool communityJob, bool jobDevelopmentServices, bool prevocServices, bool transitionedPrevocIntegrated, bool empServiceMatchPref) { using (var context = MatrixDataContext.Create()) { var empPrevocID = Guid.NewGuid(); var prevocPlan = new tblEmploymentPrevocService { EmploymentPrevocID = empPrevocID }; context.tblEmploymentPrevocServices.InsertOnSubmit(prevocPlan); var empJobDevID = Guid.NewGuid(); var jobDevPlan = new tblEmploymentJobDevelopmetService() { JobDevelopmentServicesID = empJobDevID }; context.tblEmploymentJobDevelopmetServices.InsertOnSubmit(jobDevPlan); var empPlan = new tblEmploymentQuestionnaire { CommunityJob = communityJob, EmploymentQuestionnaireID = Guid.NewGuid(), InsertDate = DateTime.Now, InsertUser = user, JobDevelopmentServices = jobDevelopmentServices, JobDevelopmentServicesID =empJobDevID, PrevocServices = prevocServices, PrevocServicesID =empPrevocID, TransitionedPrevocToIntegrated =transitionedPrevocIntegrated, EmploymentServiceMatchPref = empServiceMatchPref }; context.tblEmploymentQuestionnaires.InsertOnSubmit(empPlan); context.SubmitChanges(); } } I understand I can use more then 1 InsertOnSubmit, See SO ? HERE, I just don't understand how that would apply to my situation and the PK/FK creation.

  Read the article

• Searching Week-wise/Month-wise record counts(number) and the StartDate+EndDate(datetime) of the Week

  - by Muzaffar Ali Rana

  I have a question in connection to this question earlier posted by me:- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2452984/daily-weekly-monthly-record-count-search-via-storedprocedure I want to have the Count of Calls on Weekly-basis and Monthly-basis, Daily-basis issue is resolved. ISSUE NUMBER @1:Weekly-basis Count of Calls and Start-Date and End-Date of Week I have searched the Start-Date and End-Date of Week including their individual Count of Calls as well in the below-mentioned query. But the problem is that I could not get the result in one single table, although I have used the Temporary Tables(#TempTable+#TempTable2). Kindly help me in this regards. NOTE:Table Creation commented as for executing more than once. ----- *** TABLE CREATION OF #TempTable & #TempTable2 *** ---------- --CREATE TABLE #TempTable( StartDate datetime,EndDate datetime,CallCount numeric(18,5)) --CREATE TABLE #TempTable2( StartDate datetime,EndDate datetime,CallCount numeric(18,5)) DECLARE @StartDate datetime,@EndDate datetime,@StartDateTemp1 datetime,@StartDateTemp2 datetime,@EndDateTemp datetime,@Period varchar(50); SET @StartDate='1/1/2010'; SET @EndDate='2/28/2010'; SET @StartDateTemp1=@StartDate; SET @StartDateTemp2=DATEADD(dd, 7, @StartDate ); SET @Period='Weekly'; IF (@Period = 'Weekly') BEGIN WHILE ((@StartDate <= @StartDateTemp1) AND (@StartDateTemp2 <= @EndDate)) BEGIN IF((@StartDateTemp1 < @StartDateTemp2 ) AND (@StartDateTemp1 != @StartDateTemp2) ) BEGIN SELECT convert(varchar, @StartDateTemp1, 106) AS 'Start Date', convert(varchar, @StartDateTemp2, 106) AS 'End Date', COUNT(*) AS 'Call Count' FROM TRN_Call WHERE (CallTime = @StartDateTemp1 AND CallTime <= @StartDateTemp2 ); END SET @StartDateTemp1 = DATEADD(dd, 7, @StartDateTemp1); SET @StartDateTemp2 = DATEADD(dd, 7, @StartDateTemp2); END END ISSUE NUMBER @2:Monthly-basis Count of Calls and Start-Date and End-Date of Week In this case, I have the same search, but will have to search the Call Counts plus the Start-Date and End-Date of the Month. Kindly help me in this regards as well.

  Read the article

• GAE Task Queue oddness

  - by b3nw

  I have been testing the taskqueue with mixed success. Currently I am using the default queue, in default settings ect ect.... I have a test url setup which inserts about 8 tasks into the queue. With short order, all 8 are completed properly. So far so good. The problem comes up when I re-load that url twice under say a minute. Now watching the task queue, all the tasks are added properly, but only the first batch execute it seems. But the "Run in Last Minute" # shows the right number of tasks being run.... The request logs tell a different story. They show only the first set of 8 running, but all task creation urls working successfully. The oddness of this is that if I wait say a minute between the task creation url requests, it will work fine. Oddly enough changing the bucket_size or execution speed does not seem to help. Only the first batch are executed. I have also reduced the number of requests all the way down to 2, and still found only the first 2 execute. Any others added display the same issues as above. Any suggestions? Thanks

  Read the article

• IoC - Dynamic Composition of object instances

  - by Joshua Starner

  Is there a way using IoC, MEF [Imports], or another DI solution to compose dependencies on the fly at object creation time instead of during composition time? Here's my current thought. If you have an instance of an object that raises events, but you are not creating the object once and saving it in memory, you have to register the event handlers every time the object is created. As far as I can tell, most IoC containers require you to register all of the classes used in composition and call Compose() to make it hook up all the dependencies. I think this may be horrible design (I'm dealing with a legacy system here) to do this due to the overhead of object creation, dependency injection, etc... but I was wondering if it was possible using one of the emergent IoC technologies. Maybe I have some terminology mixed up, but my goal is to avoid writing a framework to "hook up all the events" on an instance of an object, and use something like MEF to [Export] handlers (dependencies) that adhere to a very specific interface and [ImportMany] them into an object instance so my exports get called if the assemblies are there when the application starts. So maybe all of the objects could still be composed when the application starts, but I want the system to find and call all of them as the object is created and destroyed.

  Read the article

• when does factory girl create objects in db?

  - by Pavel K.

  i am trying to simulate a session using factory girl/shoulda (it worked with fixtures but i am having problems with using factories). i have following factories (user login and email both have 'unique' validations): Factory.define :user do |u| u.login 'quentin' u.email '[email protected]' end Factory.define :session_user, :class => Session do |u| u.association :user, :factory => :user u.session_id 'session_user' end and here's the test class MessagesControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase context "normal user" do setup do @request.session[:user_id]=Factory(:user).id @request.session[:session_id]=Factory(:session_user).session_id end should "be able to access new message creation" do get :new assert_response :success end end end but when i run "rake test:functionals", i get this test result 1) Error: test: normal user should be able to access new message creation. (MessagesControllerTest): ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: Validation failed: Account name already exists!, Email already exists! which means that record already exists in db when i am referring to it in test setup. is there something i don't understand here? does factory girl create all factories in db on startup? rails 2.3.5/shoulda/factory girl

  Read the article

• ASP.NET MVC Using Castle Windsor IoC

  - by Mad Halfling

  I have an app, modelled on the one from Apress Pro ASP.NET MVC that uses castle windsor's IoC to instantiate the controllers with their respective repositories, and this is working fine e.g. public class ItemController : Controller { private IItemsRepository itemsRepository; public ItemController(IItemsRepository windsorItemsRepository) { this.itemsRepository = windsorItemsRepository; } with using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Web; using System.Web.Mvc; using Castle.Windsor; using Castle.Windsor.Configuration.Interpreters; using Castle.Core.Resource; using System.Reflection; using Castle.Core; namespace WebUI { public class WindsorControllerFactory : DefaultControllerFactory { WindsorContainer container; // The constructor: // 1. Sets up a new IoC container // 2. Registers all components specified in web.config // 3. Registers all controller types as components public WindsorControllerFactory() { // Instantiate a container, taking configuration from web.config container = new WindsorContainer(new XmlInterpreter(new ConfigResource("castle"))); // Also register all the controller types as transient var controllerTypes = from t in Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetTypes() where typeof(IController).IsAssignableFrom(t) select t; foreach (Type t in controllerTypes) container.AddComponentWithLifestyle(t.FullName, t, LifestyleType.Transient); } // Constructs the controller instance needed to service each request protected override IController GetControllerInstance(Type controllerType) { return (IController)container.Resolve(controllerType); } } } controlling the controller creation. I sometimes need to create other repository instances within controllers, to pick up data from other places, can I do this using the CW IoC, if so then how? I have been playing around with the creation of new controller classes, as they should auto-register with my existing code (if I can get this working, I can register them properly later) but when I try to instantiate them there is an obvious objection as I can't supply a repos class for the constructor (I was pretty sure that was the wrong way to go about it anyway). Any help (especially examples) would be much appreciated. Cheers MH

  Read the article

• How can I make this work with deep properties

  - by Martin Robins

  Given the following code... class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Foo foo = new Foo { Bar = new Bar { Name = "Martin" }, Name = "Martin" }; DoLambdaStuff(foo, f => f.Name); DoLambdaStuff(foo, f => f.Bar.Name); } static void DoLambdaStuff<TObject, TValue>(TObject obj, Expression<Func<TObject, TValue>> expression) { // Set up and test "getter"... Func<TObject, TValue> getValue = expression.Compile(); TValue stuff = getValue(obj); // Set up and test "setter"... ParameterExpression objectParameterExpression = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TObject)), valueParameterExpression = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TValue)); Expression<Action<TObject, TValue>> setValueExpression = Expression.Lambda<Action<TObject, TValue>>( Expression.Block( Expression.Assign(Expression.Property(objectParameterExpression, ((MemberExpression)expression.Body).Member.Name), valueParameterExpression) ), objectParameterExpression, valueParameterExpression ); Action<TObject, TValue> setValue = setValueExpression.Compile(); setValue(obj, stuff); } } class Foo { public Bar Bar { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } } class Bar { public string Name { get; set; } } The call to DoLambdaStuff(foo, f => f.Name) works ok because I am accessing a shallow property, however the call to DoLambdaStuff(foo, f => f.Bar.Name) fails - although the creation of the getValue function works fine, the creation of the setValueExpression fails because I am attempting to access a deep property of the object. Can anybody please help me to modify this so that I can create the setValueExpression for deep properties as well as shallow? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Add data to Django form class using modelformset_factory

  - by dean

  I have a problem where I need to display a lot of forms for detail data for a hierarchical data set. I want to display some relational fields as labels for the forms and I'm struggling with a way to do this in a more robust way. Here is the code... class Category(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length=160) class Item(models.Model): category = models.ForeignKey('Category') name = models.CharField(max_length=160) weight = models.IntegerField(default=0) class Meta: ordering = ('category','weight','name') class BudgetValue(models.Model): value = models.IntegerField() plan = models.ForeignKey('Plan') item = models.ForeignKey('Item') I use the modelformset_factory to create a formset of budgetvalue forms for a particular plan. What I'd like is item name and category name for each BudgetValue. When I iterate through the forms each one will be labeled properly. class BudgetValueForm(forms.ModelForm): item = forms.ModelChoiceField(queryset=Item.objects.all(),widget=forms.HiddenInput()) plan = forms.ModelChoiceField(queryset=Plan.objects.all(),widget=forms.HiddenInput()) category = "" < assign dynamically on form creation > item = "" < assign dynamically on form creation > class Meta: model = BudgetValue fields = ('item','plan','value') What I started out with is just creating a dictionary of budgetvalue.item.category.name, budgetvalue.item.name, and the form for each budget value. This gets passed to the template and I render it as I intended. I'm assuming that the ordering of the forms in the formset and the querset used to genererate the formset keep the budgetvalues in the same order and the dictionary is created correctly. That is the budgetvalue.item.name is associated with the correct form. This scares me and I'm thinking there has to be a better way. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Read the article

• sfJQueryUIPlugin: No Picker for new records

  - by Prasad

  Everyday is a new day with Symfony, but I'm loving it! This morning I installed the sfJQueryUIPlugin. It has very little dependencies & accepts themeRoller styles. However, it has 2 issues: [Feature_Request] There is no way to specify the year range. By default, it shows a 20 year range around the year in the field value. eg. if field value is 1993-01-20, the range will be 1983 to 2003. ??? Has anyone found a way out??? The DatePicker does not appear when the field is empty, Thus it does not show up during new record creation. To solve this, I tried setting up the default value in the date input field (which now appears as a text input) using $this->setDefault('date_of_birth',date('Y-m-d')); ??? Is anybody facing this problem of picker now available during new record creation ??? ??? Also is it the right way to set default value ??? Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• JAXB does not call setter when unmarshalling objects

  - by Yaneeve

  Hi all, I am using JAXB 2.0 JDK 6 in order to unmarshall an XML instance into POJOs. In order to add some custom validation I have inserted a validation call into the setter of a property, yet despite it being private, it seems that the unmarshaller does not call the setter but directly modifies the private field. It is crucial to me that the custom validation occurs for this specific field every unmarshall call. What should I do? Code: @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) @XmlType(name = "LegalParams", propOrder = { "value" }) public class LegalParams { private static final Logger LOG = Logger.getLogger(LegalParams.class); @XmlTransient private LegalParamsValidator legalParamValidator; public LegalParams() { try { WebApplicationContext webApplicationContext = ContextLoader.getCurrentWebApplicationContext(); LegalParamsFactory legalParamsFactory = (LegalParamsFactory) webApplicationContext.getBean("legalParamsFactory"); HttpSession httpSession = SessionHolder.getInstance().get(); legalParamValidator = legalParamsFactory.newLegalParamsValidator(httpSession); } catch (LegalParamsException lpe) { LOG.warn("Validator related error occurred while attempting to construct a new instance of LegalParams"); throw new IllegalStateException("LegalParams creation failure", lpe); } catch (Exception e) { LOG.warn("Spring related error occurred while attempting to construct a new instance of LegalParams"); throw new IllegalStateException("LegalParams creation failure", e); } } @XmlValue private String value; /** * Gets the value of the value property. * * @return * possible object is * {@link String } * */ public String getValue() { return value; } /** * Sets the value of the value property. * * @param value * allowed object is * {@link String } * @throws TestCaseValidationException * */ public void setValue(String value) throws TestCaseValidationException { legalParamValidator.assertValid(value); this.value = value; } }

  Read the article

• jquery how to create a new div, assign some attributes, and create an id from some other elements at

  - by Ronedog

  How can I accomplish this...what I've tried below is not working and I'm unsure how to make it work. What I'm trying to do is create a div and assign it some attributes, then append this div to all the < li elements that are the on the last node of my unordered list. And lastly, but most important I want to retrieve the value of the attribute called "p_node" from the < li that is being appended to and insert it in as part of the ID of the newely created div Here's my current jquery code: $('<div />,{id:"'+ $("#nav li:not(:has(li))").attr("p_node").val() +'_p_cont_div", class:"property_position"}').appendTo("#nav li:not(:has(li))"); Here's the HTML before the div creation: <ul> <li p_node="98" class="page_name">Category A</li> </ul> <ul> <li p_node="99" class="page_name">Category B</li> </ul> Here's what I want it to look like after the new div creation: <ul> <li p_node="98" class="page_name">Category A</li> <div id="98_p_cont_div" class="property_position"></div> </ul> <ul> <li p_node="99" class="page_name">Category B</li> <div id="99_p_cont_div" class="property_position"></div> </ul> Thanks for your help.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42  | Next Page >