Search Results

Search found 31989 results on 1280 pages for 'method'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 37/1280 | < Previous Page | 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44  | Next Page >

  • Use Windbg find argumet passed to a COM+ method

    - by G33kKahuna
    Generated a debug diagnostic dump file for a COM+ application. Upon analysis look like threads deadlocks at line OLE32!SwitchSTA. My symbol path is pointing to msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols. Is there way to know what arguments were passed to this method? In general, how does one use Windbg to find the input argument value to the method call? thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • access exception when invoking method of an anonymous class using java reflection

    - by Asaf David
    Hello I'm trying to use an event dispatcher to allow a model to notify subscribed listeners when it changes. the event dispatcher receives a handler class and a method name to call during dispatch. the presenter subscribes to the model changes and provide a Handler implementation to be called on changes. Here's the code (I'm sorry it's a bit long). EventDispacther: package utils; public class EventDispatcher<T> { List<T> listeners; private String methodName; public EventDispatcher(String methodName) { listeners = new ArrayList<T>(); this.methodName = methodName; } public void add(T listener) { listeners.add(listener); } public void dispatch() { for (T listener : listeners) { try { Method method = listener.getClass().getMethod(methodName); method.invoke(listener); } catch (Exception e) { System.out.println(e.getMessage()); } } } } Model: package model; public class Model { private EventDispatcher<ModelChangedHandler> dispatcher; public Model() { dispatcher = new EventDispatcher<ModelChangedHandler>("modelChanged"); } public void whenModelChange(ModelChangedHandler handler) { dispatcher.add(handler); } public void change() { dispatcher.dispatch(); } } ModelChangedHandler: package model; public interface ModelChangedHandler { void modelChanged(); } Presenter: package presenter; public class Presenter { private final Model model; public Presenter(Model model) { this.model = model; this.model.whenModelChange(new ModelChangedHandler() { @Override public void modelChanged() { System.out.println("model changed"); } }); } } Main: package main; public class Main { public static void main(String[] args) { Model model = new Model(); Presenter presenter = new Presenter(model); model.change(); } } Now, I except to get the "model changed" message. However, I'm getting an java.lang.IllegalAccessException: Class utils.EventDispatcher can not access a member of class presenter.Presenter$1 with modifiers "public". I understand that the class to blame is the anonymous class i created inside the presenter, however I don't know how to make it any more 'public' than it currently is. If i replace it with a named nested class it seem to work. It also works if the Presenter and the EventDispatcher are in the same package, but I can't allow that (several presenters in different packages should use the EventDispatcher) any ideas?

    Read the article

  • How can I find the method that called the current method?

    - by flipdoubt
    When logging in C#, how can I learn the name of the method that called the current method? I know all about System.Reflection.MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod(), but I want to go one step beneath this in the stack trace. I've considered parsing the stack trace, but I am hoping to find a cleaner more explicit way, something like Assembly.GetCallingAssembly() but for methods.

    Read the article

  • Why is the setContextClassLoader() method placed on Thread ?

    - by Roman
    Why is the setContextClassLoader() method placed on thread ? What different thread have different classloaders? The question is what if i extended a classloader , loaded there some new classes. to the my custom classloader. Now , I want it to be the context classloader , so I call the method (Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(loader)). Are these new classes awailable only in the context of the current Thread ? ( or how does it work ?) Thanks

    Read the article

  • Java method missing (ala Ruby) for decorating?

    - by cibercitizen1
    Is there any technique available in Java for intercepting messages (method calls) like the method_missing technique in Ruby? This would allow coding decorators and proxies very easily, like in Ruby: :Client p:Proxy im:Implementation ------- ---------- ----------------- p.foo() -------> method_missing() do_something im.foo() ------------------> do_foo p.bar() --------> method_missing() do_something_more im.bar() -------------------> do_bar (Note: Proxy only has one method: method_missing())

    Read the article

  • Why do we need to use out keyword while calling a method

    - by Midhat
    When a method is defined with an out parameter, why do I have to specify the out keyword when calling it. Its already there in the method definition, and the runtime should know that any parameter passed will be an out parameter. It would make sense if the compiler will accept the argument with or without out keyword, with different semantic, but if you MUST add the keyword to make the code compile, whats the use? Shouldn't the compiler handle it automatically? Same for ref

    Read the article

  • Avoid compiling when using Decimal.Round() method (C#/CF)

    - by Christian Almeida
    Is there a way to tell to VS2005 to get compiler error when using "some defined" method? It probably sounds strange, but I do not want to compile when using Decimal.Round(). Reason: CF does not round by "awayfromzero", so I created a method to do this job. But sometimes I (and team) forget that is not to use Decimal.Round. So I'd like to get a compiler error when using it.

    Read the article

  • To Reference A Generic Method With A Lambda Expression

    - by SDReyes
    It is possible to reference a generic method using a Lambda Expression Object? For example, having: TheObject: public abstract class LambdaExpression : Expression TheMethod (an extension method of LINQ): public static TSource Last<TSource>( this IEnumerable<TSource> source ) I'm trying to create an instance of TheObject, that references to TheMethod. How do you do such thing?

    Read the article

  • instantiate spring bean via factory method

    - by Don
    Hi, I need to instantiate a Spring bean in the same manner as this Java code: MyClass foo = Mockito.mock(MyClass.class); The XML I need will look something like: <bean id="foo" class="Mockito" factory-method="mock"> <constructor-arg value="MyClass"/> </bean> I can't seem to find the correct syntax for passing a Class object as a parameter to the factory method. Thanks, Don

    Read the article

  • Rails auto_complete "undefined method `auto_complete_for'" problem

    - by Andrew Wize
    rails - 2.3.8 ruby - 1.8.7 After auto_complete plugin installstion i still have "undefined method `auto_complete_for'" problem! Andrey-Bezruks-MacBook-Pro:eyeonasia.stage wizeflux$ ruby script/plugin install http://github.com/rails/auto_complete.git --force svn: '/Users/wizeflux/Projects/ionasia/eyeonasia.stage/vendor/plugins' is not a working copy Initialized empty Git repository in /Users/wizeflux/Projects/ionasia/eyeonasia.stage/vendor/plugins/auto_complete/.git/ warning: Option "depth" is ignored for github.com/rails/auto_complete.git From github.com/rails/auto_complete * branch HEAD - FETCH_HEAD Andrey-Bezruks-MacBook-Pro:eyeonasia.stage wizeflux$ after restarting server i get an error on line " auto_complete_for :listings, :name " - undefined method `auto_complete_for' for #

    Read the article

  • Why does std queue not define a swap method specialisation

    - by Jamie Cook
    I've read that all stl containers provide a specialisation of the swap algorithm so as to avoid calling the copy constructor and two assignment operations that the default method uses. However, when I thought it would be nice to use a queue in some code I was working on I noticed that (unlike vector and deque) queue doesn't provide this method? I just decided to use a deque instead of a queue, but still I'm interested to know why this is?

    Read the article

  • In an extension method how do a create an object based on the implementation class

    - by Greg
    Hi, In an extension method how do a create an object based on the implementation class. So in the code below I wanted to add an "AddRelationship" extension method, however I'm not sure how within the extension method I can create an Relationship object? i.e. don't want to tie the extension method to this particular implementation of relationship public static class TopologyExtns { public static void AddNode<T>(this ITopology<T> topIf, INode<T> node) { topIf.Nodes.Add(node.Key, node); } public static INode<T> FindNode<T>(this ITopology<T> topIf, T searchKey) { return topIf.Nodes[searchKey]; } public static bool AddRelationship<T>(this ITopology<T> topIf, INode<T> parentNode, INode<T> childNode) { var rel = new RelationshipImp(); // ** How do I create an object from teh implementation // Add nodes to Relationship // Add relationships to Nodes } } public interface ITopology<T> { //List<INode> Nodes { get; set; } Dictionary<T, INode<T> > Nodes { get; set; } } public interface INode<T> { // Properties List<IRelationship<T>> Relationships { get; set; } T Key { get; } } public interface IRelationship<T> { // Parameters INode<T> Parent { get; set; } INode<T> Child { get; set; } } namespace TopologyLibrary_Client { class RelationshipsImp : IRelationship<string> { public INode<string> Parent { get; set; } public INode<string> Child { get; set; } } } public class TopologyImp<T> : ITopology<T> { public Dictionary<T, INode<T>> Nodes { get; set; } public TopologyImp() { Nodes = new Dictionary<T, INode<T>>(); } } thanks

    Read the article

  • NetBeans shortcut key for collapsing/expanding a method

    - by Stefanos Kargas
    JAVA - NETBEANS This is an IDE question I am always working with collapsed methods, because I want to be able to see my methods all together. This is a little time consuming because I have to use the mouse to scroll up to the declaration of the method and click on the - (minus) icon. And then respectively go to the method I want to work on and click on the + (plus) icon. Is there a way through a keyboard shortcut to do the collapse (and respectively the expand)?

    Read the article

  • Hide a base class method from derived class, but still visible outside of assembly

    - by clintp
    This is a question about tidyness. The project is already working, I'm satisfied with the design but I have a couple of loose ends that I'd like to tie up. My project has a plugin architecture. The main body of the program dispatches work to the plugins that each reside in their own AppDomain. The plugins are described with an interface, which is used by the main program (to get the signature for invoking DispatchTaskToPlugin) and by the plugins themselves as an API contract: namespace AppServer.Plugin.Common { public interface IAppServerPlugin { void Register(); void DispatchTaskToPlugin(Task t); // Other methods omitted } } In the main body of the program Register() is called so that the plugin can register its callback methods with the base class, and then later DispatchTaskToPlugin() is called to get the plugin running. The plugins themselves are in two parts. There's a base class that implements the framework for the plugin (setup, housekeeping, teardown, etc..). This is where DispatchTaskToPlugin is actually defined: namespace AppServer.Plugin { abstract public class BasePlugin : MarshalByRefObject, AppServer.Plugin.Common.IAppServerPlugin { public void DispatchTaskToPlugin(Task t) { // ... // Eventual call to actual plugin code // } // Other methods omitted } } The actual plugins themselves only need to implement a Register() method (to give the base class the delegates to call eventually) and then their business logic. namespace AppServer.Plugin { public class Plugin : BasePlugin { override public void Register() { // Calls a method in the base class to register itself. } // Various callback methods, business logic, etc... } } Now in the base class (BasePlugin) I've implemented all kinds of convenience methods, collected data, etc.. for the plugins to use. Everything's kosher except for that lingering method DispatchTaskToPlugin(). It's not supposed to be callable from the Plugin class implementations -- they have no use for it. It's only needed by the dispatcher in the main body of the program. How can I prevent the derived classes (Plugin) from seeing the method in the base class (BasePlugin/DispatchTaskToPlugin) but still have it visible from outside of the assembly? I can split hairs and have DispatchTaskToPlugin() throw an exception if it's called from the derived classes, but that's closing the barn door a little late. I'd like to keep it out of Intellisense or possibly have the compiler take care of this for me. Suggestions?

    Read the article

  • php 5.1.6 magic __toString method

    - by NachoF
    In codeigniter Im trying to use this plugin which requires I implement a toString method in my models. My toString method simply does return $this->name On my local machine with php 5.3 everything works just fine but on the production server with php 5.1.6 it shows "Object id#48" where the value of the name property of that object should appear..... I found something about the problem here but I still dont understand... How can I fix this?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44  | Next Page >