Search Results

Search found 27001 results on 1081 pages for 'michael palmeter (engineered systems product management)'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 382/1081 | < Previous Page | 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389  | Next Page >

  • Distorted choppy audio in Precise

    - by Misery
    After installing Precise on my PC, some problems with soud occure. While using Lucid there were no problems. The sound is choppy and distorted in low tones range. As I absolutely have no experience in setting/testing and doing anything with Audo Devices I need help even to diagnose the problem. update: sudo lshw -c multimedia *-multimedia description: Audio device product: Radeon X1200 Series Audio Controller vendor: Hynix Semiconductor (Hyundai Electronics) physical id: 5.2 bus info: pci@0000:01:05.2 version: 00 width: 64 bits clock: 33MHz capabilities: pm msi bus_master cap_list configuration: driver=snd_hda_intel latency=32 resources: irq:19 memory:fdafc000-fdafffff *-multimedia description: Audio device product: SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA) vendor: Hynix Semiconductor (Hyundai Electronics) physical id: 14.2 bus info: pci@0000:00:14.2 version: 00 width: 64 bits clock: 33MHz capabilities: pm bus_master cap_list configuration: driver=snd_hda_intel latency=32 resources: irq:16 memory:fe024000-fe027fff update 2: It has something to do with the volume. If the audio is quiet it is not choppy, if the sound is loud then it begins to be choppy. Regards, Misery

    Read the article

  • Sharing ideas without risk of leaking

    - by eversor
    As freelancers, we meet somewhere and chat about a new idea for a project, brainstorm etc. Up to this point, we have taken notes of the ideas, but we would like to be able to share more efficiently the ideas with each other. However, I fear that if I use some online product (such as Google Docs) these ideas could be seen by people outside the team (employees of the company of the online product, other users...). I am not sure if I am being a little Paranoid parrot... One solution that we have considered is to install a Subversion with just one ideas.txt. But that would require a server in one of our houses, which is a little unconfortable. So how do you share your ideas for a new project with your team without risking the ideas to be stolen?

    Read the article

  • How to approach multiple page form with just one save option

    - by Dano007
    The screen shot shows the magento product upload page. The left nav allows you to switch to different options for the product. Basically each option in the left nav appears as a different page. However when you save and close, it will save all the updates made on each page. Using Foundation4, html, css, js - what would be the best approach to replicating something similar? Say I want 3 pages and one save button option. Using http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/section.html#panel2 and having the save buttons the top line form level seems a possible option.

    Read the article

  • Reminder: Free, Global, Virtual Developer Day November 5th

    - by jeckels
    Just a quick reminder about the FREE virtual developer day focused on Coherence (and WebLogic) coming on November 5th. This day, with content tailored for developers, will guide you through tooling updates and best practices around creating applications with WebLogic and Coherence as target platforms. We'll also explore advances in how you can manage your build, deploy and ongoing management processes to streamline your application's life cycle. And of course, we'll conclude with some hands-on labs that ensure this isn't all a bunch of made-up stuff - get your hands dirty in the code!November 5, 20139am PT/12pm ETREGISTER NOW We're offering two tracks for your attendance, though of course you're free to attend any session you wish. The first will be for pure developers with sessions around developing for WebLogic with HTML5, processing live events with Coherence, and looking at development tooling. The second is for developers who are involved in the building and management processes as part of the application life cycle. These sessions focus on using Maven for builds, using Chef and Puppet for configuration and more.We look forward to seeing you there - don't forget to invite a friend!

    Read the article

  • Ops Center and Oracle Solaris 11

    - by user12609425
    There have been a few questions about Ops Center and S11 recently. People have been trying to discover and update S11 from Enterprise Controllers installed on S10 or Linux, and running into problems, and wondering what the solution is. Well, the solution is that, if you want to be able to discover, monitor, and update S11 OSes, you need to install your Enterprise Controller and at least one Proxy Controller on S11 systems. The Oracle Solaris and Linux install guides both note this in the chapters that cover preparing your environment. Technically, if you have an S11 Proxy Controller you can at least discover, manage, and monitor S11 systems. However, features like the automated installer and the image packaging system (for OS updates) can only be used through Ops Center if your Enterprise Controller is installed on S11 as well.

    Read the article

  • Pillar Axiom OpenWorld Highlights

    - by uwes
    During the Storage General Session at Oracle OpenWorld Conference 2012 in San Francisco, the following Axiom-related announcements were made: Oracle Platinum Services for Axiom 600: Extending Oracle's Platinum Services to Axiom 600 as a standalone product –  the same level of service and support you get with Exadata – 24/7 fault monitoring, dedicated response and escalation management to meet enterprise-grade SLA’s, patch planning and management. Oracle Enterprise Manager Axiom Plug-in: Allowing DBA's to manage, maintain, monitor and provision the Axiom 600 storage system from Oracle EM. Oracle Virtual Machine Axiom Plug-in: Allowing Oracle VM and System Administrators to manage, maintain, monitor and provision the Axiom 600 storage system from Oracle VM using Storage Connect. Oracle Axiom Data Protection Manager 3.1: Leveraging Axiom's Copy Services, System Administrators can automatically create Application Consistent Clones of critical Windows and Oracle DataBase environments for quick recovery. For More Information Go To: Oracle.com Pillar Axiom Page Oracle Technology Network SAN Page

    Read the article

  • Leviton Manufacturing Upgrades to Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1

    Leviton Manufacturing is a global manufacturer of electrical wiring devices, data center connectivity solutions, and lighting energy mgmt systems. It's portfolio consists of more than 25,000 devices and systems used in homes, business, and industry. Leviton upgraded to the latest version of Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1 to support its service business with change management, purchasing, accounts payable, and an internal IT help desk. They consolidated seven Web sites that are used to host individually onto iStore. In addition, they run a site, using the Oracle E-Business Suite configurator, pricing and quoting for their sales agents to do configuration work. This site can now generate a complete sales proposal using Oracle functionality.

    Read the article

  • Live EBS Webcasts Coming Up Soon

    - by LuciaC
    There are a number of live webcasts coming up in the next couple of weeks.  Webcasts are free for Oracle Support customers and are an opportunity to learn about a topic from a product expert as well as ask questions directly.  Here is a reminder of what's available and how to register. Product Area Topic Date/Time Register & Details BI Publisher EBS BI/XML Publisher Overview & Best Practices 22 October, 2200 PT Doc ID 1582767.1 Receivables Receivables Release 12 Late Charges Functionality 23 October, 0800 PT Doc ID 1581280.1 WMS Advanced Catch-Weight with WMS 23 October, 1000 PT Doc ID 1583954.1 Install Base Endeca Extension for Oracle Install Base 24 October, 0830 PT Doc ID 1583876.1 WIP Understanding Work Order Closure 30 October, 0800 PT Doc ID 1584358.1 EAM Collection Plans Within E-Business Suite 31 October, 0800 PT Doc ID 1583924.1 All the webcasts are recorded which means you can play them back whenever is convenient for you if you can't join the live session. You can access the recordings as well as the current webcast schedule from Doc ID 740966.1.

    Read the article

  • Come visit us at OOW 2012 B2B Demo Booth!

    - by user701307
    You’re invited to visit us at the Oracle B2B Demo POD at Oracle OpenWorld and JavaOne 2012. OOW offers a unique opportunity to meet the engineers who have developed the Oracle B2B product. Please stop by at our booth to see cool demos on EDI X12, EDIFACT and SBRES (used in Airlines industry). We will also be showing integration with OSB, SOA Suite and BAM. Use this opportunity to see the product in action, learn, and get answers to your questions. We will be happy to meet you and hear about your B2B integration usecases and discuss our roadmap. The demo pod will be available at the Fusion Middleware Demo POD area on Monday, October 1 through Wednesday, October 3, 2012. Look forward to seeing you there! Happy OOW 2012!

    Read the article

  • B2B Customer Case Study Presentation at OOW 2012!

    - by user701307
    Real life B2B customer talking about consolidation to Oracle B2B and SOA Suite. Hear Kevin Kluggage, IT Director, Stryker and me present on consolidating legacy B2B networks on a global B2B infrastructure using Oracle B2B and SOA Suite. This session will discuss B2B industry trends, product overview, Stryker's case study and will elaborate on the benefits of using Oracle B2B to solve your partner integration needs today. Oracle B2B is Drummond Certified and has customers using the product in Supply Chain, Travel, Transport, Healthcare, Hightech and Telecom industries. We are excited about our session, and look forward to see you there! Wed, Oct 3, 3:30 PM – 4:30 PM – Moscone West – 3003CON5003 – Delivering a High-Value Global B2B Network with Oracle SOA Suite 11g

    Read the article

  • Introducing Next-Generation Enterprise Auditing and Database Firewall Platform Webcast, 12/12/12

    - by Troy Kitch
    Join us, December 12 at 10am PT/1pm ET, to hear about a new Oracle product that monitors Oracle and non-Oracle database traffic, detects unauthorized activity including SQL injection attacks, and blocks internal and external threats from reaching the database. In addition, this new product collects and consolidates audit data from databases, operating systems, directories, and any custom template-defined source into a centralized, secure warehouse. This new enterprise security monitoring and auditing platform allows organizations to quickly detect and respond to threats with powerful real-time policy analysis, alerting and reporting capabilities. Based on proven SQL grammar analysis that ensures accuracy, performance, and scalability, organizations can deploy with confidence in any mode. You will also hear how organizations such as TransUnion Interactive and SquareTwo Financial rely on Oracle today to monitor and secure their Oracle and non-Oracle database environments. Register for the webcast here.

    Read the article

  • URL Frame redirection CakePHP

    - by themanbehindoftheprojectmayhem
    I need to redirect CakePHP installation host to my domain. Location of my Cakephp installation: myhosting.com/newsite/ Domain: www.mydomain.com I'm currently using URL Frame to direct www.mydomain.com to myhosting.com/newsite/. Problem When I load www.mydomain.com, I see all links in the site is pointing to the hosting location - example - myhosting.com/newsite/product/1 It should be pointing to www.mydomain.com/product/1 Any simple way to fix this? Probably very simple to solve it, but I can't bend it. Help much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Oracle Fusion Middleware 11g (11.1.1.3.0) ?????????

    - by Hiroyuki Yoshino
    ????Media Pack??????????????????????1, 2???????????????? ??????????????????????Oracle Fusion Middleware 11g (11.1.1.3.0)??????????????????????????FAQ????????????????????????????????? (?????????????????????????????) ????FAQ????????? Q. Oracle Fusion Middleware?????·????????????????? A. ??·??????????????????????·?????Oracle??????????????SOA Suite 11g R1 (11.1.1.2.0)???·??????? ?????????????????Oracle??????????????????????????????????SOA Suite 11g R1 (11.1.1.3.0)?SOA Suite 11g R1 (11.1.1.2.0)????????????????????????????? ??Oracle Technology Network???????·??????·???????????????????????????????? Q. ??????????????????????????????? A. ?????????????????????????????? Product Version Required Product WebLogic Server Repository Creation Utility JDeveloper 11.1.1.2 10.3.2 11.1.1.2.1 11.1.1.2.0 11.1.1.3 10.3.3 11.1.1.3.0 11.1.1.3.0 ????? ??????????????????????????

    Read the article

  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Firefox web browser

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2012-0451 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability 4.3 Firefox web browser Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 8.5 CVE-2012-0455 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability 4.3 CVE-2012-0456 Information Exposure vulnerability 5.0 CVE-2012-0457 Resource Management Errors vulnerability 9.3 CVE-2012-0458 Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability 6.8 CVE-2012-0459 Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability 7.5 CVE-2012-0460 Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability 6.4 CVE-2012-0461 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 7.5 CVE-2012-0462 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 7.5 CVE-2012-0464 Resource Management Errors vulnerability 7.5 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Thunderbird

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2012-0451 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability 4.3 Thunderbird Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 8.5 CVE-2012-0455 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability 4.3 CVE-2012-0456 Information Exposure vulnerability 5.0 CVE-2012-0457 Resource Management Errors vulnerability 9.3 CVE-2012-0458 Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability 6.8 CVE-2012-0459 Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability 7.5 CVE-2012-0460 Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability 6.4 CVE-2012-0461 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 7.5 CVE-2012-0462 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 7.5 CVE-2012-0464 Resource Management Errors vulnerability 7.5 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Is How the Company Makes Its Money One of The Most Important Determining Factors in their work environment, culture, etc

    - by programmx10
    This is a viewpoint I've started to realize recently about some companies that I have worked for. They had their own software product that they developed in-house but most of the focus was on building an in-person sales team to push their product to businesses throughout the country. I figure that companies that are exclusively "online", meaning that their revenue source comes from online transactions where there is no "face" of the company to the customer would have a different work culture. Just curious if anyone has worked for both types of companies and notices a difference. I myself am hoping to get more into contract programming and figure that companies that don't have to employ a sales-force and things like that would be more focused on technology and maybe even willing to be flexible on partial telecommute, etc

    Read the article

  • Improve Bad testing

    - by SetiSeeker
    We have a large team of developers and testers. The ratio is one tester for every one developer. We have full bug tracking and reporting systems in place. We have test plans in place. Every change to the product, the testing team is involved in the design of the feature and are included in the development process as much as possible. We build in small iterative blocks, using scrum methodology and every scrum they are included in, including the grooming sessions etc. But every release of the product, they miss even the most simple and obvious defects. How can we improve this?

    Read the article

  • Genworth Financial Talks about the Value they received from Upgrading to Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1

    Genworth Financial is a publicly traded global financial security company and has a presence in more than 25 countries. Genworth Financial is recognized in Standard & Poor's 500 Index of Leading U.S. companies and ranked in the Fortune 500. Genworth Financial is committed to helping people effectively protect and achieve the comfort of financial security. Genworth Financial upgraded to the latest version of Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1 to support the management of their employees with core HR, Employee Self-Service, Compensation Workbench, Oracle Learning Management Oracle's Time and Labor. Genworth Financial will share their reasons for upgrading, their lessons learned and the benefits they are receiving.

    Read the article

  • Is it reasonable to insist on reproducing every defect before diagnosing and fixing it?

    - by amphibient
    I work for a software product company. We have large enterprise customers who implement our product and we provide support to them. For example, if there is a defect, we provide patches, etc. In other words, It is a fairly typical setup. Recently, a ticket was issued and assigned to me regarding an exception that a customer found in a log file and that has to do with concurrent database access in a clustered implementation of our product. So the specific configuration of this customer may well be critical in the occurrence of this bug. All we got from the customer was their log file. The approach I proposed to my team was to attempt to reproduce the bug in a similar configuration setup as that of the customer and get a comparable log. However, they disagree with my approach saying that I should not need to reproduce the bug (as that is overly time-consuming and will require simulating a server cluster on VMs) and that I should simply "follow the code" to see where the thread- and/or transaction-unsafe code is and put the change working off of a simple local development, which is not a cluster implementation like the environment from which the occurrence of the bug originates. To me, working out of an abstract blueprint (program code) rather than a concrete, tangible, visible manifestation (runtime reproduction) seems like a difficult working environment (for a person of normal cognitive abilities and attention span), so I wanted to ask a general question: Is it reasonable to insist on reproducing every defect and debug it before diagnosing and fixing it? Or: If I am a senior developer, should I be able to read (multithreaded) code and create a mental picture of what it does in all use case scenarios rather than require to run the application, test different use case scenarios hands on, and step through the code line by line? Or am I a poor developer for demanding that kind of work environment? Is debugging for sissies? In my opinion, any fix submitted in response to an incident ticket should be tested in an environment simulated to be as close to the original environment as possible. How else can you know that it will really remedy the issue? It is like releasing a new model of a vehicle without crash testing it with a dummy to demonstrate that the air bags indeed work. Last but not least, if you agree with me: How should I talk with my team to convince them that my approach is reasonable, conservative and more bulletproof?

    Read the article

  • Many ui panels needs interaction with same object

    - by user877329
    I am developing a tool for simulating systems like the Gray-Scott model (That is systems where spatial distribution depends on time). The actual model is loaded from a DLL or shared object and the simulation is performed by a Simulation object. There are at least two situations when the simulation needs to be destroyed: The user loads a new model The user changes the size of the domain To make sure nothing goes wrong, the current Model, Simulation, and rendering Thread are all managed by an ApplicationState object. But the two cases above are initiated from two different UI objects. Is it then ok to distribute a reference to the ApplicationState object to all panels that need to access at least one method on the ApplicationState object? Another solution would be to use aggregation so that the panel from which the user chooses model knows the simulation parameter panel. Also, the ApplicationState class seems somewhat clumsy, so I would like to have something else

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389  | Next Page >