Search Results

Search found 49727 results on 1990 pages for 'multiple select query'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 39/1990 | < Previous Page | 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46  | Next Page >

  • jquery select elements between two elements that are not siblings

    - by naugtur
    eg. [I've removed attributes, but it's a bit of auto-generated html] <img class="p"/> <div> hello world <p> <font><font size="2">text.<img class="p"/> some text</font></font> </p> <img class="p"/> <p> <font><font size="2">more text<img class="p"/> another piece of text </font></font> </p><img class="p"/> some text on the end </div> I need to apply some highlighting with backgrounds to all text that is between two closest [in the html code] img.p elements when hovering first of them. I have no idea how to do that. Lets say I hover the first img.p - it should highlight hello world and text. and nothing else. And now the worst part - I need the backgrounds to disappear on mouseleave. I need it to work with any HTML mess possible. The above is just an example and structure of the documents will differ. [tip. Processing the whole html before binding hover and putting some spans etc. is ok as long as it doesn't change the looks of the output document]

    Read the article

  • select SUM in Cake

    - by SpawnCxy
    When I tried using follow code to get the sum of the column named Serviceinfo.services $conditions = array('fields'=>array('SUM(Serviceinfo.services) as servicecount'),'conditions'=>array('time_id BETWEEN ? AND ?'=>array($startid,$endtid))); $services = $this->Serviceinfo->find('all',$conditions); I had to fetch the sum data with services[0][0]['servicecount'] which seems a little weird.And What I expect is services['Serviceinfo']['servicecount'],or more simple one.Then how can I fix this?Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • mysql select update

    - by Tillebeck
    Got this: Table a ID RelatedBs 1 NULL 2 NULL Table b AID ID 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 Need Table a to have a comma separated list as given in table b. And then table b will become obsolete: Table a ID RelatedBs 1 1,2,3 2 4,5,6 This does not rund through all records, but just ad one 'b' to 'table a' UPDATE a, b SET relatedbs = CONCAT(relatedbs,',',b.id) WHERE a.id = b.aid

    Read the article

  • PL/SQL - How to pull data from 3 tables based on latest created date

    - by Nancy
    Hello, I'm hoping someone can help me as I've been stuck on this problem for a few days now. Basically I'm trying to pull data from 3 tables in Oracle: 1) Orders Table 2) Vendor Table and 3) Master Data Table. Here's what the 3 tables look like: Table 1: BIZ_DOC2 (Orders table) OBJECTID (Unique key) UNIQUE_DOC_NAME (Document Name i.e. ORD-005) CREATED_AT (Date the order was created) Table 2: UDEF_VENDOR (Vendors Table): PARENT_OBJECT_ID (This matches up to the ObjectId in the Orders table) VENDOR_OBJECT_NAME (This is the name of the vendor i.e. Acme) Table 3: BIZ_UNIT (Master Data table) PARENT_OBJECT_ID (This matches up to the ObjectID in the Orders table) BIZ_UNIT_OBJECT_NAME (This is the name of the business unit i.e. widget A, widget B) Note: The Vendors Table and Master Data do not have a link between them except through the Orders table. I can join all of the data from the tables and it looks something like this: Before selecting latest order date: ORD-005 | Widget A | Acme | 3/14/10 ORD-005 | Widget B | Acme | 3/14/10 ORD-004 | Widget C | Acme | 3/10/10 Ideally I'd like to return the latest order for each vendor. However, each order may contain multiple business units (e.g. types of widgets) so if a Vendor's latest record is ORD-005 and the order contains 2 business units, here's what the result set should look like by the following columns: UNIQUE_DOC_NAME, BIZ_UNIT_OBJECT_NAME, VENDOR_OBJECT_NAME, CREATED_AT After selecting by latest order date: ORD-005 | Widget A | Acme | 3/14/10 ORD-005 | Widget B | Acme | 3/14/10 I tried using Select Max and several variations of sub-queries but I just can't seem to get it working. Any help would be hugely appreciated!

    Read the article

  • select rows with unidentical column values

    - by Bazon
    Hi Guys, I need to create a new data frame that excludes dams that appear in "dam1" and "dam2" columns on the same fosdate (fostering date). I tried df <- df[df$dam1!=dam2,] but did not work. Dam1 and dam2 are factors which are the ids's of mothers. my df: fosdate dam1 dam2 8/09/2009 2Z523 2Z523 30/10/2009 1W509 5C080 30/10/2009 1W509 5C640 30/10/2009 1W509 1W509 1/10/2009 1W311 63927 The new data frame that I need to get is: dfnew: fosdate dam1 dam2 30/10/2009 1W509 5C080 30/10/2009 1W509 5C640 1/10/2009 1W311 63927 Would appreciate any help! Bazon

    Read the article

  • MySQL Select statement Where table1.id != table2.id

    - by Michael
    I have a table of data which has posts, then I have a separate table of data which has deleted posts. What happens when a post is deleted is that it's ID get's added to the deleted table rather than removing the post entry. What is a clean efficient way of selecting all the posts from the posts table without selecting the ones that have their ID in the deleted table

    Read the article

  • jquery form select (if exists in $_POST)

    - by SoulieBaby
    Hi all, I'm trying to redo this in jQuery: <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"> var thisIsSelected = '<?php echo $_POST['image']; ?>'; var sel1= document.getElementById('image'); sel1.value = thisIsSelected; </script> But I seem to keep breaking it lol Basically I want jQuery to check if $_POST['image'] exists and if so make it selected on the form. I'm assuming if it's possibly with javascript, jquery can do it easier ;)

    Read the article

  • PHP mySQL - select unique value that not being used from dirrefent table

    - by apis17
    Updates : Please see below i have table: data +-----------------------+--------------+-----------+ | State | d_country | d_postcode| +-----------------------+--------------+-----------+ | State1 | Country1 | 1111 | | State2 | Country2 | 2222 | | State3 | Country3 | 3333 | | State4 | Country4 | 4444 | +-----------------------+--------------+-----------+ And another table: user +-----------------------+--------------+-----------+ | Name | u_country | u_postcode| +-----------------------+--------------+-----------+ | Name1 | Country3 | 3333 | | Name2 | Country5 | 5555 | | Name3 | | 6666 | | Name4 | Country6 | 6666 | | Name5 | Country6 | 6666 | +-----------------------+--------------+-----------+ What SQL should i use to: Determine the number (count) of country that are not listed on table data. For example u_postcode is not listed in d_postcode is 5555 and 6666. It will return 2. List down name and what country not available in table data yet. Updates I want to use grouping to filter postcode and make Name3 and Name4 as different rows. For example: +-----------------------+--------------+-----------+ | Name | u_country | u_postcode| +-----------------------+--------------+-----------+ | Name2 | Country5 | 5555 | | Name3 | | 6666 | | Name4 | Country6 | 6666 | +-----------------------+--------------+-----------+ Any possible idea?

    Read the article

  • Understanding #DAX Query Plans for #powerpivot and #tabular

    - by Marco Russo (SQLBI)
    Alberto Ferrari wrote a very interesting white paper about DAX query plans. We published it on a page where we'll gather articles and tools about DAX query plans: http://www.sqlbi.com/topics/query-plans/I reviewed the paper and this is the result of many months of study - we know that we just scratched the surface of this topic, also because we still don't have enough information about internal behavior of many of the operators contained in a query plan. However, by reading the paper you will start reading a query plan and you will understand how it works the optimization found by Chris Webb one month ago to the events-in-progress scenario. The white paper also contains a more optimized query (10 time faster), even if the performance depends on data distribution and the best choice really depends on the data you have. Now you should be curious enough to read the paper until the end, because the more optimized query is the last example in the paper!

    Read the article

  • sql select puzzle: remove children when parent is filtered out

    - by knicnak32
    I have a table essentially: name has_children parent_id row_id values0.....valuesn parent 1 1 1 children 0 1 2 children 0 1 3 parent 0 4 4 parent 1 5 5 children 0 5 6 children 0 5 7 the values for the children can be different than the values for the parent. i want some selects/joins that will filter the table on a value column (i.e. 10) and will return the parent (even if false for the filter) if one of it's children is true for the filter. acceptable return: parent=true all children=false, return just parent parent=false >=1 children=true, return parent and one non-filtered child i'm sure this has been thought about before but i don't have the faintest idea how to phrase the question to find a solution.

    Read the article

  • Why is doing a top(1) on an indexed column in SQL Server slow?

    - by reinier
    I'm puzzled by the following. I have a DB with around 10 million rows, and (among other indices) on 1 column (campaignid_int) is an index. Now I have 700k rows where the campaignid is indeed 3835 For all these rows, the connectionid is the same. I just want to find out this connectionid. use messaging_db; SELECT TOP (1) connectionid FROM outgoing_messages WITH (NOLOCK) WHERE (campaignid_int = 3835) Now this query takes approx 30 seconds to perform! I (with my small db knowledge) would expect that it would take any of the rows, and return me that connectionid If I test this same query for a campaign which only has 1 entry, it goes really fast. So the index works. How would I tackle this and why does this not work? edit: estimated execution plan: select (0%) - top (0%) - clustered index scan (100%)

    Read the article

  • select rows with unidentical column values using R

    - by Bazon
    Hi Guys, I need to create a new data frame that excludes dams that appear in "dam1" and "dam2" columns on the same fosdate (fostering date). I tried df <- df[df$dam1!=df$dam2,] but did not work. Dam1 and dam2 are factors which are the ids's of mothers. my df: fosdate dam1 dam2 8/09/2009 2Z523 2Z523 30/10/2009 1W509 5C080 30/10/2009 1W509 5C640 30/10/2009 1W509 1W509 1/10/2009 1W311 63927 The new data frame that I need to get is: dfnew: fosdate dam1 dam2 30/10/2009 1W509 5C080 30/10/2009 1W509 5C640 1/10/2009 1W311 63927 Would appreciate any help! Bazon

    Read the article

  • Rails/mysql SUM distinct records - optimization

    - by pepernik
    Hey. How would you optimize this SQL SELECT SUM(tmp.cost) FROM ( SELECT DISTINCT clients.id as client, countries.credits_cost AS cost FROM countries INNER JOIN clients ON clients.country_id = countries.id INNER JOIN clients_groups ON clients_groups.client_id=clients.id WHERE clients_groups.group_id IN (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) GROUP BY clients.id ) AS tmp; I'm using this example as part of my Ruby on Rails project. Note that my nested SQL (tmp) can have more then 10 milion records. You can split that in more SQLs if the performance is better. Should I add any indexes to make it quicker (i have it on IDs)?

    Read the article

  • MySQL Many to Many with Unique keys and Update/Select if Exists otherwise Insert

    - by Jayrox
    In my goal to have a Many-to-Many relationship in my MySQL database I have arrived at another bridge to build. Current Tables: Users (id, name) Tags (id, name) User_Tags (user_id, tag_id) Here is the goal: I would like to have the ability to take a tag i.e: #fb and insert it into my Tags database which has a unique constraint on name and if the tag exists I would like to return it's id I would like to insert the tag.id and the current user's user.id into User_Tags. I do not have any unique constraints on the User_Tags table because I would like to be able to track the user's most commonly used tags and present them in a list ordered by frequency of use. I am currently developing this project in PHP using prepared statements. Additionally, performance is not currently an issue as my user count is still fairly small, but it is steadily growing and may be an issue in the future.

    Read the article

  • Why is doing a top(1) on an indexed column in mssql slow?

    - by reinier
    I'm puzzled by the following. I have a DB with around 10 million rows, and (among other indices) on 1 column is an index. Now I have 700k rows where the campaignid is indeed 3835 For all these rows, the connectionid is the same. I just want to find out this connectionid. use messaging_db; SELECT TOP (1) connectionid FROM outgoing_messages WITH (NOLOCK) WHERE (campaignid_int = 3835) Now this query takes approx 30 seconds to perform! I (with my small db knowledge) would expect that it would take any of the rows, and return me that connectionid If I test this same query for a campaign which only has 1 entry, it goes really fast. So the index works. How would I tackle this and why does this not work?

    Read the article

  • SQL Selecting from one table OR another then joining the two

    - by Cyprus106
    So this is interesting, and apparently beyond my SQL skillset. I need to select a particular record where an ID="0003" (or whatever) from either table1 or table2 if table1 doesn't have that record. Then I need to join table1 and table2 on a mutual field they both have (field name is Product_ID) I was playing with all sorts of variations of the following, (no, it doesn't work) but after 2 days of groping through the internet and a big SQL book I still can't figure anything out. SELECT ProductStock.Product_ID AS PSID, Products.ID AS PID, ProductStock.*, Products.* FROM ProductStock, Products LEFT JOIN (Products AS Pr) ON Pr.ID=ProductStock.Product_ID WHERE (ProductStock.ID="6003" OR Products.ID="6003")

    Read the article

  • MySQL PHP | "SELECT FROM table" using "alphanumeric"-UUID. Speed vs. Indexed Integer / Indexed Char

    - by dropson
    At the moment, I select rows from 'table01' using: SELECT * FROM table01 WHERE UUID = 'whatever'; The UUID column is a unique index. I know this isn't the fastest way to select data from the database, but the UUID is the only row-identifier that is available to the front-end. Since I have to select by UUID, and not ID, I need to know what of these two options I should go for, if say the table consists of 100'000 rows. What speed differences would I look at, and would the index for the UUID grow to large, and lag the DB? Get the ID before doing the "big" select 1. $id = "SELECT ID FROM table01 WHERE UUID = '{alphanumeric character}'"; 2. $rows = SELECT * FROM table01 WHERE ID = $id; Or keep it the way it is now, using the UUID. 1. SELECT FROM table01 WHERE UUID '{alphanumeric character}'; Side note: All new rows are created by checking if the system generated uniqueid exists before trying to insert a new row. Keeping the column always unique. The "example" table. CREATE TABLE Table01 ( ID int NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, UUID char(15), name varchar(100), url varchar(255), `date` datetime ) ENGINE = InnoDB; CREATE UNIQUE INDEX UUID ON Table01 (UUID);

    Read the article

  • A query for date within a year

    - by Fabiano PS
    My table is like this on Postgres, note that all days start by 01, there is only 1 entry a month+year SELECT * FROM "fis_historico_receita" +----+------------+---------------+ | id | data | receita_bruta | +----+------------+---------------+ | 1 | 2010-02-01 | 100000.0 | | 2 | 2010-01-01 | 100000.0 | | 3 | 2009-12-01 | 100000.0 | | 4 | 2009-11-01 | 100000.0 | | 5 | 2009-10-01 | 100000.0 | | 6 | 2009-09-01 | 100000.0 | | 7 | 2009-08-01 | 100000.0 | | 8 | 2009-07-01 | 100000.0 | | 9 | 2009-06-01 | 100000.0 | | 10 | 2009-05-01 | 100000.0 | | 11 | 2009-04-01 | 100000.0 | | 12 | 2009-03-01 | 100000.0 | | 13 | 2009-02-01 | 100000.0 | | 14 | 2009-01-01 | 100000.0 | | 15 | 2008-12-01 | 100000.0 | +----+------------+---------------+ What I want is to find 12 months starting right from before the current. I tried this: select * from fis_historico_receita where data in interval '1 year' I really would like an answer using Interval, +1 goes for everyone that runs on Postgres

    Read the article

  • Optional parameters with named query in Hibernate?

    - by Ickster
    Is there any way to specify optional parameters (such as when search parameters are provided from a form and not all parameters are required) in a named query when using Hibernate? I'm using a native SQL query, but the question is probably applicable to named HQL queries as well. I'm pretty sure the answer to this is 'no', but I haven't find the definitive answer in the documentation yet.

    Read the article

  • hierachical query to return final row

    - by jeff
    I have a hierarchical query that doesn't return an expected row (employee badge = 444). TABLE: hr_data badge fname supervisor_badge 111 Jeff 222 222 Joe 333 333 John 444 444 Tom 444 SQL: SELECT CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE As IC, badge, fname, supervisor_badge FROM hr_data START WITH badge = '111' CONNECT BY NOCYCLE badge = PRIOR supervisor_badge What is Returned: IC badge fname supervisor_badge 0 111 Jeff 222 0 222 Joe 333 1 333 John 444 What is Expected: IC badge fname supervisor_badge 0 111 Jeff 222 0 222 Joe 333 **0** 333 John 444 **1** 444 Tom 444 How can I get this query to return the employee Tom and then stop?

    Read the article

  • Using Treelist Values to Query a Sitecore Item

    - by kirk.burleson
    I have an item named All Recipes that contains recipes named R1, R2, and R3. I have another item named My Recipes that has a treelist field named Recipes and it contains selected values R2 and R3 from the All Recipes item. The query I'm trying to write is for the Items field of an RSS Feed. What is the query syntax to show the items in All Recipes that appear in the Recipes field of My Recipes?

    Read the article

  • Query that ignore the spaces.

    - by xRobot
    What's the best way to run a query so that spaces in the fields are ignored? For example the following queries.... SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE username = "JohnBobJones" SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE username = "John Bob Jones" . would find the following entries: John Bob Jones JohnBob Jones JohnBobJones . I am using php or python but I think this doesn't matter.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46  | Next Page >