Search Results

Search found 2966 results on 119 pages for 'procedural generation'.

Page 39/119 | < Previous Page | 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46  | Next Page >

  • Link Error : xxx is already defined in *****.LIB :: What exactly is wrong?

    - by claws
    Problem: I'm trying to use a library named DCMTK which used some other external libraries ( zlib, libtiff, libpng, libxml2, libiconv ). I've downloaded these external libraries (*.LIB & *.h files ) from the same website. Now, when I compile the DCMTK library I'm getting link errors (793 errors) like this: Error 2 error LNK2005: __encode_pointer already defined in MSVCRTD.lib(MSVCR90D.dll) LIBCMTD.lib dcmmkdir Error 3 error LNK2005: __decode_pointer already defined in MSVCRTD.lib(MSVCR90D.dll) LIBCMTD.lib dcmmkdir Error 4 error LNK2005: __CrtSetCheckCount already defined in MSVCRTD.lib(MSVCR90D.dll) LIBCMTD.lib dcmmkdir Error 5 error LNK2005: __invoke_watson already defined in MSVCRTD.lib(MSVCR90D.dll) LIBCMTD.lib dcmmkdir Error 6 error LNK2005: __errno already defined in MSVCRTD.lib(MSVCR90D.dll) LIBCMTD.lib dcmmkdir Error 7 error LNK2005: __configthreadlocale already defined in MSVCRTD.lib(MSVCR90D.dll) LIBCMTD.lib dcmmkdir Error 8 error LNK2005: _exit already defined in MSVCRTD.lib(MSVCR90D.dll) LIBCMTD.lib dcmmkdir Documentation: This seems to be a popular error for this library so, they do have a FAQ entry addressing this issue which ( http://forum.dcmtk.org/viewtopic.php?t=35 ) says: The problem is that the linker tries to combine different, incompatible versions of the Visual C++ runtime library into a single binary. This happens when not all parts of your project and the libraries you link against are generated with the same code generation options in Visual C++. Do not use the /NODEFAULTLIB workaround, because strange software crashes may follow. Fix the problem! DCMTK is by default compiled with the "Multithreaded" or "Multithreaded Debug" code generation option (the latter for Debug mode). Either change the project settings of all of your code to use these code generation options, or change the code generation for all DCMTK modules and re-compile. MFC users beware: DCMTK should be compiled with "Multithreaded DLL" or "Multithreaded DLL Debug" settings if you want to link the libraries into an MFC application. Solution to same problem for others: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2259697/vscopengl-huge-amount-of-linker-issues-with-release-build-only says: It seems that your release build is trying to link to something that was built debug. You probably have a broken dependency in your build, (or you missed rebuilding something to release by hand if your project is normally built in pieces). More technically, you seem to be linking projects built with different C Run Time library settings, one with "Multi-Threaded", another one with "Multi-Threaded Debug". Adjust the settings for all the projects to use the very same flavour of the library and the issue should go away Questions: Till now I used to think that Name mangling is the only problem that may cause linking failures if its not been standardized. Just now I knew there are other things also which can cause same effect. Whats up with the "Debug Mode" (Multi-Threaded Debug) and "Release Mode" (Multi-Threaded)? What exactly is happening under the hood? Why exactly this thing is causing linking error? I wonder if there is something called "Single-Threaded Debug" and "Single-Threaded" which again causes the same thing. Documentation talks something about "Code Generation Options". What Code Generation Options? WTH are they? Documentation specifically warns us not to use /NODEFAULTLIB workaround. (example /NODEFAULTLIB :msvcrt ). Why? How would I cause troubles? what exactly is it? Please explain the last point in the documentation for MFC users. Because I'm going to use MFC later in this project. Explain Why should we do it? What troubles would it cause if I don't. Anything more you'd like to mention? I mean regarding similar errors. I'm very interested in Linker & its problems. So, if there are any similar things you can mentions them or some keywords atleast.

    Read the article

  • Storing Entity Framework Entities in a Separate Assembly

    - by Anthony Trudeau
    The Entity Framework has been valuable to me since it came out, because it provided a convenient and powerful way to model against my data source in a consistent way.  The first versions had some deficiencies that for me mostly fell in the category of the tight coupling between the model and its resulting object classes (entities). Version 4 of the Entity Framework pretty much solves this with the support of T4 templates that allow you to implement your entities as self-tracking entities, plain old CLR objects (POCO), et al.  Doing this involves either specifying a new code generation template or implementing them yourselves.  Visual Studio 2010 ships with a self-tracking entities template and a POCO template is available from the Extension Manager.  (Extension Manager is very nice but it's very easy to waste a bunch of time exploring add-ins.  You've been warned.) In a current project I wanted to use POCO; however, I didn't want my entities in the same assembly as the context classes.  It would be nice if this was automatic, but since it isn't here are the simple steps to move them.  These steps detail moving the entity classes and not the context.  The context can be moved in the same way, but I don't see a compelling reason to physically separate the context from my model. Turn off code generation for the template.  To do this set the Custom Tool property for the entity template file to an empty string (the entity template file will be named something like MyModel.tt). Expand the tree for the entity template file and delete all of its items.  These are the items that were automatically generated when you added the template. Create a project for your entities (if you haven't already). Add an existing item and browse to your entity template file, but add it as a link (do not add it directly).  Adding it as a link will allow the model and the template to stay in sync, but the code generation will occur in the new assembly.

    Read the article

  • Few basic Billing facts

    - by Rajesh Sharma
    Quick basic points on Billing: In batch billing, there can be one and ONLY ONE bill for an Account, per Bill Cycle. If an Account has been already billed within the current Bill Cycle's window period, it will not be billed again and will be skipped by the Bill Segment generation program, part of batch eligibility check routine. If an Account does not have any Stopped Service Agreements and you attempt to generate a Bill for that Account that too for a period for which it was already billed, no Bill Segments are generated and a Pending Bill is created for that Account. If a Pending Bill exists for an Account and was generated from a batch, the Account will be re-billed in the next batch run. In contrast, if a Pending Bill exists for an Account and was generated online, the Account will be skipped in the next batch run of the Account's Bill Cycle. Bill generation source, Batch or Online at DB level is determined as following: Batch = CI_BILL.BILL_CYC_CD = {Bill Cycle Code} and CI_BILL.WIN_START_DT = {Window Start Date} Online = CI_BILL.BILL_CYC_CD = "" and CI_BILL.WIN_START_DT IS NULL Bill generation source, Batch or Online from Bill page is determined as following: Batch Online   Closing/Final Bill segment is generated for Stopped Service Agreements and is determined as follows: DB level CI_BSEG.CLOSING_BSEG_SW = "Y" Bill Segment page

    Read the article

  • Webinar: NoSQL - Data Center Centric Application Enablement

    - by Charles Lamb
    NoSQL - Data Center Centric Application Enablement AUGUST 6 WEBINAR About the Webinar The growth of Datacenter infrastructure is trending out of bounds, along with the pace in user activity and data generation in this digital era. However, the nature of the typical application deployment within the data center is changing to accommodate new business needs. Those changes introduce complexities in application deployment architecture and design, which cascade into requirements for a new generation of database technology (NoSQL) destined to ease that complexity. This webcast will discuss the modern data centers data centric application, the complexities that must be dealt with and common architectures found to describe and prescribe new data center aware services. Well look at the practical issues in implementation and overview current state of art in NoSQL database technology solving the problems of data center awareness in application development. REGISTER NOW>> MORE INFORMATION >> NOTE! All attendees will be entered to win a guest pass to the NoSQL Now! 2013 Conference & Expo. About the Speaker Robert Greene, Oracle NoSQL Product Management Robert GreeneRobert Greene is a principle product manager / strategist for Oracle’s NoSQL Database technology. Prior to Oracle he was the V.P. Technology for a NoSQL Database company, Versant Corporation, where he set the strategy for alignment with Big Data technology trends resulting in the acquisition of the company by Actian Corp in 2012. Robert has been an active member of both commercial and open source initiatives in the NoSQL and Object Relational Mapping spaces for the past 18 years, developing software, leading project teams, authoring articles and presenting at major conferences on these topics. In his previous life, Robert was an electronic engineer developing first generation wireless, spread spectrum based security systems.

    Read the article

  • Managing JS and CSS for a static HTML web application

    - by Josh Kelley
    I'm working on a smallish web application that uses a little bit of static HTML and relies on JavaScript to load the application data as JSON and dynamically create the web page elements from that. First question: Is this a fundamentally bad idea? I'm unclear on how many web sites and web applications completely dispense with server-side generation of HTML. (There are obvious disadvantages of JS-only web apps in the areas of graceful degradation / progressive enhancement and being search engine friendly, but I don't believe that these are an issue for this particular app.) Second question: What's the best way to manage the static HTML, JS, and CSS? For my "development build," I'd like non-minified third-party code, multiple JS and CSS files for easier organization, etc. For the "release build," everything should be minified, concatenated together, etc. If I was doing server-side generation of HTML, it'd be easy to have my web framework generate different development versus release HTML that includes multiple verbose versus concatenated minified code. But given that I'm only doing any static HTML, what's the best way to manage this? (I realize I could hack something together with ERB or Perl, but I'm wondering if there are any standard solutions.) In particular, since I'm not doing any server-side HTML generation, is there an easy, semi-standard way of setting up my static HTML so that it contains code like <script src="js/vendors/jquery.js"></script> <script src="js/class_a.js"></script> <script src="js/class_b.js"></script> <script src="js/main.js"></script> at development time and <script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.8.2/jquery.min.js"></script> <script src="js/entire_app.min.js"></script> for release?

    Read the article

  • Iva&rsquo;s internship story

    - by anca.rosu
    Hello, my name is Iva and I am a member of the Internship program at Oracle Czech. When I joined Oracle, I initially worked as an Alliances and Channel Marketing Assistant at Oracle Czech Republic, but most recently, I have been working in the Demand Generation Team. I am a student of the Economics and Management Faculty at Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, specializing in Marketing, Business and Administration. I have recently passed my Bachelor exams. I received the information about Oracle’s Internship opportunity from a friend. I joined Oracle in September 2008 and worked as an Alliances and Channel Marketing Assistant until May 2009. Here I was responsible for the Open Market Model (OMM) and at the same time I was covering communication with Partners, Oracle Events and Team Buildings as well as creating Partner Databases and Reports. At the moment, I support our Demand Generation Team to execute Direct Marketing campaigns in Czech Republic, Slovak Republic and Hungary. In addition to this, I help with Reporting and Contact Data Management for the whole of the European Enlargement (EE) and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) regions. I enjoy my job and I appreciate the experience. Every day is interesting, because every day I learn something new. I am very happy that I was presented with an opportunity to work at Oracle and cooperate with friendly people in a multicultural environment. Oracle gives me the chance to develop my skills and start building my career. I am able to attend interesting training classes, improve my language skills and enjoy sporting activities, such as squash, swimming and aerobics, at the same time. If you dream of working in an international company and you would like to join a very dynamic industry, I really can recommend Oracle without a doubt, even if you have no IT background! If you have any questions related to this article feel free to contact  [email protected].  You can find our job opportunities via http://campus.oracle.com   Technorati Tags: Internship program,Oracle Czech,Economics,Management Faculty,Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague,Demand Generation Team

    Read the article

  • Asset and Work Management in Utilities: An Integrated Enterprise Success Story

    - by stephen.slade(at)oracle.com
    Jan 11 '11 Webcast: Utilities are turning to Oracle to deliver an integrated EAM platform that manages all of their assets from fleet to facilities and distribution to generation. Hear from solutions experts and from Sunflower Electric Power Corporation about how an integrated enterprise asset and work management system helped them deliver bottom line results Do you have different work management systems for generation, distribution, and transmission? Fleet maintenance? Facilities? Are you on the latest release of these products? Have you considered your options when the product is no longer supported? Do you struggle with integration and keeping the various systems "in balance"? Do you have trouble retrieving data from these disparate systems and getting an enterprise view of asset and work management operations? Utilities are challenged to better manage information on generation, transmission and distribution assets. Point solutions for Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) and Computerized Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS) are often effective as departmental solutions but have limited ability to deliver an enterprise solution with accessible business intelligence. Date:  January 11, 2011 @ 10am PT/1pm ET EVITE:  http://www.oracle.com/us/dm/h2fy11/63025-wwmk10040611mpp054c003-se-197386.html Register: HERE

    Read the article

  • Big Data Appliance X4-2 Release Announcement

    - by Jean-Pierre Dijcks
    Today we are announcing the release of the 3rd generation Big Data Appliance. Read the Press Release here. Software Focus The focus for this 3rd generation of Big Data Appliance is: Comprehensive and Open - Big Data Appliance now includes all Cloudera Software, including Back-up and Disaster Recovery (BDR), Search, Impala, Navigator as well as the previously included components (like CDH, HBase and Cloudera Manager) and Oracle NoSQL Database (CE or EE). Lower TCO then DIY Hadoop Systems Simplified Operations while providing an open platform for the organization Comprehensive security including the new Audit Vault and Database Firewall software, Apache Sentry and Kerberos configured out-of-the-box Hardware Update A good place to start is to quickly review the hardware differences (no price changes!). On a per node basis the following is a comparison between old and new (X3-2) hardware: Big Data Appliance X3-2 Big Data Appliance X4-2 CPU 2 x 8-Core Intel® Xeon® E5-2660 (2.2 GHz) 2 x 8-Core Intel® Xeon® E5-2650 V2 (2.6 GHz) Memory 64GB 64GB Disk 12 x 3TB High Capacity SAS 12 x 4TB High Capacity SAS InfiniBand 40Gb/sec 40Gb/sec Ethernet 10Gb/sec 10Gb/sec For all the details on the environmentals and other useful information, review the data sheet for Big Data Appliance X4-2. The larger disks give BDA X4-2 33% more capacity over the previous generation while adding faster CPUs. Memory for BDA is expandable to 512 GB per node and can be done on a per-node basis, for example for NameNodes or for HBase region servers, or for NoSQL Database nodes. Software Details More details in terms of software and the current versions (note BDA follows a three monthly update cycle for Cloudera and other software): Big Data Appliance 2.2 Software Stack Big Data Appliance 2.3 Software Stack Linux Oracle Linux 5.8 with UEK 1 Oracle Linux 6.4 with UEK 2 JDK JDK 6 JDK 7 Cloudera CDH CDH 4.3 CDH 4.4 Cloudera Manager CM 4.6 CM 4.7 And like we said at the beginning it is important to understand that all other Cloudera components are now included in the price of Oracle Big Data Appliance. They are fully supported by Oracle and available for all BDA customers. For more information: Big Data Appliance Data Sheet Big Data Connectors Data Sheet Oracle NoSQL Database Data Sheet (CE | EE) Oracle Advanced Analytics Data Sheet

    Read the article

  • Run external application on markdown source in ikiwiki

    - by student
    Can I add a button to each wiki page in ikiwiki which launches an external application (on the client side) or script with the markdown code of the current page as input? Edit: I didn't realize that it might be complicated to do it on client side as Zenklys' answer suggested. So perhaps I should describe more concretely what I have in mind: I want to have two buttons: "Get LaTeX" and 2. "Get pdf". Clicking on "Get LaTeX should generate a LaTeX file and the browser should simply open or download that file. Analogously for the pdf. It would even be ok, to have a button "Generate LaTeX" instead, which generates the LaTeX code and changes after the generation to "Get LaTeX" which simply points to the LaTeX file. So it is not really necessary to do the generation of the files on client side. Would be ok, if this is done (on a temporary folder) on server side. For the LaTeX resp. pdf generation I want to use a custom wrapper script for pandoc, let's call it mymarkdown2latex resp. mymarkdown2pdf.

    Read the article

  • Uralelektrostroy Improves Turnaround Times for Engineering and Construction Projects by Approximately 50% with Better Project Data Management

    - by Melissa Centurio Lopes
    LLC Uralelektrostroy was established in 1998, to meet the growing demand for reliable energy supply, which included the deployment and operation of a modern power grid system for Russia’s booming economy and industrial sector. To rise to the challenge, the country required a company with a strong reputation and the ability to strategically operate energy production and distribution facilities. As a renowned energy expert, Uralelektrostroy successfully embarked on the mission—focusing on the design, construction, and operation of power grids, transmission lines, and generation facilities. Today, Uralelektrostroy leads the Russian utilities industry with operations across the country, particularly in the Ural, Western Siberia, and Moscow regions. Challenges: Track work progress through all engineering project development stages with ease—from planning and start-up operations, to onsite construction and quality assurance—to enhance visibility into complex projects, such as power grid and power-transmission-line construction Implement and execute engineering projects faster—for example, designing and building power generation and distribution facilities—by better monitoring numerous local subcontractors Improve alignment of project schedules with project owners’ requirements—awarding federal and regional authorities—to avoid incurring fines for missing deadlines Solutions: Used Oracle’s Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management 8.1 to streamline communication with customers and subcontractors through better data management and harmonized reporting, reducing construction project implementation and turnaround times by approximately 50%, on average Enabled fast generation of work-in-progress reports that track project schedules, budgets, materials, and staffing—from approval and material procurement, to construction and delivery Reduced the number of construction sites by nearly 30% (from 35 to 25) by identifying unprofitable sites—streamlining operations at the company’s construction site network and increasing profitability Improved project visibility by enabling managers to efficiently track project status, ensuring on-time reporting and punctual project deliveries to federal customers to reduce delay penalties to zero “Oracle’s Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management 8.1 drastically changed the way we run our business. We’ve reduced the number of redundant assets, streamlined project implementation and execution, and improved collaboration with our customers and contractors. Overall, the Oracle deployment helped to increase our profitability.” – Roman Aleksandrovich Naumenko, Head of Information Technology, LLC Uralelektrostroy Read the complete customer snapshot here.

    Read the article

  • apache fails to connect to tomcat (Worker config?)

    - by techventure
    I have a tomcat 6 with follwoing server.xml: <Connector port="8253" maxThreads="150" minSpareThreads="25" maxSpareThreads="75" enableLookups="false" redirectPort="8445" acceptCount="100" debug="0" connectionTimeout="20000" disableUploadTimeout="true" /> <Connector port="8014" protocol="AJP/1.3" redirectPort="8445" /> and in added worker.properties: # Set properties for worker4 (ajp13) worker.worker4.type=ajp13 worker.worker4.host=localhost worker.worker4.port=8014 and i put in httpd.conf: JkMount /myWebApp/* worker4 It is not working a as trying to navigate to www1.myCompany.com/myWebApp gives "Service Temporarily Unavailable". I checked in tomcat catalina.out and it says: INFO: JK: ajp13 listening on /0.0.0.0:8014 UPDATE: i put mod_jk log level to debug and below is the result: [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_set_time_fmt::jk_util.c (458): Pre-processed log time stamp format is '[%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] ' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_open::jk_uri_worker_map.c (770): rule map size is 8 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_add::jk_uri_worker_map.c (720): wildchar rule '/myWebApp/*=worker4' source 'JkMount' was added [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (171): uri map dump after map open: index=0 file='(null)' reject_unsafe=0 reload=60 modified=0 checked=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 0: size=0 nosize=0 capacity=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 1: size=8 nosize=0 capacity=8 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (186): NEXT (1) map #3: uri=/myWebApp/* worker=worker4 context=/myWebApp/* source=JkMount type=Wildchar len=6 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_set_time_fmt::jk_util.c (458): Pre-processed log time stamp format is '[%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] ' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] init_jk::mod_jk.c (3123): Setting default connection pool max size to 1 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.list' with value 'worker1,worker2,worker3,worker4' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.worker4.type' with value 'ajp13' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.worker4.host' with value 'localhost' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.worker4.port' with value '8014' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_resolve_references::jk_map.c (774): Checking for references with prefix worker. with wildcard (recursion 1) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_shm_calculate_size::jk_shm.c (132): shared memory will contain 4 ajp workers of size 256 and 0 lb workers of size 320 with 0 members of size 320+256 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [error] init_jk::mod_jk.c (3166): Initializing shm:/var/log/httpd/mod_jk.shm.9552 errno=13. Load balancing workers will not function properly. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'ServerRoot' -> '/etc/httpd' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.list' -> 'worker1,worker2,worker3,worker4' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker1.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker1.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker1.port' -> '8009' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker2.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker2.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker2.port' -> '8010' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker3.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker3.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker3.port' -> '8112' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker4.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker4.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker4.port' -> '8014' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] build_worker_map::jk_worker.c (242): creating worker worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] wc_create_worker::jk_worker.c (146): about to create instance worker4 of ajp13 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] wc_create_worker::jk_worker.c (159): about to validate and init worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_validate::jk_ajp_common.c (2512): worker worker4 contact is 'localhost:8014' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2699): setting endpoint options: [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2702): keepalive: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2706): socket timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2710): socket connect timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2714): buffer size: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2718): pool timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2722): ping timeout: 10000 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2726): connect timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2730): reply timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2734): prepost timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2738): recovery options: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2742): retries: 2 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2746): max packet size: 8192 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2750): retry interval: 100 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_create_endpoint_cache::jk_ajp_common.c (2562): setting connection pool size to 1 with min 1 and acquire timeout 200 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [info] init_jk::mod_jk.c (3183): mod_jk/1.2.28 initialized [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] wc_get_worker_for_name::jk_worker.c (116): found a worker worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] wc_get_name_for_type::jk_worker.c (293): Found worker type 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_ext::jk_uri_worker_map.c (512): Checking extension for worker 3: worker4 of type ajp13 (2) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (171): uri map dump after extension stripping: index=0 file='(null)' reject_unsafe=0 reload=60 modified=0 checked=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 0: size=0 nosize=0 capacity=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 1: size=8 nosize=0 capacity=8 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (186): NEXT (1) map #3: uri=/myWebApp/* worker=worker4 context=/myWebApp/* source=JkMount type=Wildchar len=6 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_switch::jk_uri_worker_map.c (482): Switching uri worker map from index 0 to index 1 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_set_time_fmt::jk_util.c (458): Pre-processed log time stamp format is '[%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] ' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_open::jk_uri_worker_map.c (770): rule map size is 8 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_add::jk_uri_worker_map.c (720): wildchar rule '/myWebApp/*=worker4' source 'JkMount' was added [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (171): uri map dump after map open: index=0 file='(null)' reject_unsafe=0 reload=60 modified=0 checked=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 0: size=0 nosize=0 capacity=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 1: size=8 nosize=0 capacity=8 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (186): NEXT (1) map #0: uri=/jsp-examples/* worker=worker1 context=/jsp-examples/* source=JkMount type=Wildchar len=15 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (186): NEXT (1) map #3: uri=/myWebApp/* worker=worker4 context=/myWebApp/* source=JkMount type=Wildchar len=6 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_set_time_fmt::jk_util.c (458): Pre-processed log time stamp format is '[%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] ' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] init_jk::mod_jk.c (3123): Setting default connection pool max size to 1 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.list' with value 'worker1,worker2,worker3,worker4' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.worker4.type' with value 'ajp13' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.worker4.host' with value 'localhost' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.worker4.port' with value '8014' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_resolve_references::jk_map.c (774): Checking for references with prefix worker. with wildcard (recursion 1) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_shm_calculate_size::jk_shm.c (132): shared memory will contain 4 ajp workers of size 256 and 0 lb workers of size 320 with 0 members of size 320+256 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [error] init_jk::mod_jk.c (3166): Initializing shm:/var/log/httpd/mod_jk.shm.9553 errno=13. Load balancing workers will not function properly. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'ServerRoot' -> '/etc/httpd' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.list' -> 'worker1,worker2,worker3,worker4' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker1.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker1.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker1.port' -> '8009' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker2.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker2.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker2.port' -> '8010' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker3.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker3.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker3.port' -> '8112' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker4.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker4.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker4.port' -> '8014' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] build_worker_map::jk_worker.c (242): creating worker worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] wc_create_worker::jk_worker.c (146): about to create instance worker4 of ajp13 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] wc_create_worker::jk_worker.c (159): about to validate and init worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_validate::jk_ajp_common.c (2512): worker worker4 contact is 'localhost:8014' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2699): setting endpoint options: [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2702): keepalive: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2706): socket timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2710): socket connect timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2714): buffer size: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2718): pool timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2722): ping timeout: 10000 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2726): connect timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2730): reply timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2734): prepost timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2738): recovery options: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2742): retries: 2 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2746): max packet size: 8192 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2750): retry interval: 100 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_create_endpoint_cache::jk_ajp_common.c (2562): setting connection pool size to 1 with min 1 and acquire timeout 200 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [info] init_jk::mod_jk.c (3183): mod_jk/1.2.28 initialized [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] wc_get_worker_for_name::jk_worker.c (116): found a worker worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] wc_get_name_for_type::jk_worker.c (293): Found worker type 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_ext::jk_uri_worker_map.c (512): Checking extension for worker 3: worker4 of type ajp13 (2) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (171): uri map dump after extension stripping: index=0 file='(null)' reject_unsafe=0 reload=60 modified=0 checked=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 0: size=0 nosize=0 capacity=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 1: size=8 nosize=0 capacity=8 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (186): NEXT (1) map #3: uri=/myWebApp/* worker=worker4 context=/myWebApp/* source=JkMount type=Wildchar len=6 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_switch::jk_uri_worker_map.c (482): Switching uri worker map from index 0 to index 1 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9556:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9557:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9558:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9559:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9560:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9561:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9562:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9563:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9564:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9565:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9567:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9568:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9566:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9569:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9570:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] map_uri_to_worker_ext::jk_uri_worker_map.c (1036): Attempting to map URI '/myWebApp/jsp/login.faces' from 8 maps [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] find_match::jk_uri_worker_map.c (850): Attempting to map context URI '/myWebApp/*=worker4' source 'JkMount' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] find_match::jk_uri_worker_map.c (863): Found a wildchar match '/myWebApp/*=worker4' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] jk_handler::mod_jk.c (2459): Into handler jakarta-servlet worker=worker4 r->proxyreq=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] wc_get_worker_for_name::jk_worker.c (116): found a worker worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] wc_maintain::jk_worker.c (339): Maintaining worker worker1 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] wc_maintain::jk_worker.c (339): Maintaining worker worker2 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] wc_maintain::jk_worker.c (339): Maintaining worker worker3 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] wc_maintain::jk_worker.c (339): Maintaining worker worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] wc_get_name_for_type::jk_worker.c (293): Found worker type 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] init_ws_service::mod_jk.c (977): Service protocol=HTTP/1.1 method=GET ssl=false host=(null) addr=167.184.214.6 name=www1.myCompany.com.au port=80 auth=(null) user=(null) laddr=10.215.222.78 raddr=167.184.214.6 uri=/myWebApp/jsp/login.faces [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_get_endpoint::jk_ajp_common.c (2977): acquired connection pool slot=0 after 0 retries [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_marshal_into_msgb::jk_ajp_common.c (605): ajp marshaling done [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (2283): processing worker4 with 2 retries [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1501): (worker4) all endpoints are disconnected. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (452): socket TCP_NODELAY set to On [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (576): trying to connect socket 18 to 127.0.0.1:8014 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [info] jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (594): connect to 127.0.0.1:8014 failed (errno=13) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [info] ajp_connect_to_endpoint::jk_ajp_common.c (922): Failed opening socket to (127.0.0.1:8014) (errno=13) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [error] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1507): (worker4) connecting to backend failed. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port (errno=13) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [info] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (2447): (worker4) sending request to tomcat failed (recoverable), because of error during request sending (attempt=1) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (2304): retry 1, sleeping for 100 ms before retrying [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1501): (worker4) all endpoints are disconnected. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (452): socket TCP_NODELAY set to On [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (576): trying to connect socket 18 to 127.0.0.1:8014 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [info] jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (594): connect to 127.0.0.1:8014 failed (errno=13) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [info] ajp_connect_to_endpoint::jk_ajp_common.c (922): Failed opening socket to (127.0.0.1:8014) (errno=13) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [error] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1507): (worker4) connecting to backend failed. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port (errno=13) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [info] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (2447): (worker4) sending request to tomcat failed (recoverable), because of error during request sending (attempt=2) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [error] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (2466): (worker4) connecting to tomcat failed. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_reset_endpoint::jk_ajp_common.c (743): (worker4) resetting endpoint with sd = 4294967295 (socket shutdown) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_done::jk_ajp_common.c (2905): recycling connection pool slot=0 for worker worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [info] jk_handler::mod_jk.c (2615): Service error=-3 for worker=worker4 The error i get in browser is: Service Temporarily Unavailable Apache/2.2.3 (Red Hat) Server at www1.myCompany.com.au Port 80 can someone please help and explain what is going on and how it can be resolved?

    Read the article

  • TicTacToe AI Making Incorrect Decisions

    - by Chris Douglass
    A little background: as a way to learn multinode trees in C++, I decided to generate all possible TicTacToe boards and store them in a tree such that the branch beginning at a node are all boards that can follow from that node, and the children of a node are boards that follow in one move. After that, I thought it would be fun to write an AI to play TicTacToe using that tree as a decision tree. TTT is a solvable problem where a perfect player will never lose, so it seemed an easy AI to code for my first time trying an AI. Now when I first implemented the AI, I went back and added two fields to each node upon generation: the # of times X will win & the # of times O will win in all children below that node. I figured the best solution was to simply have my AI on each move choose and go down the subtree where it wins the most times. Then I discovered that while it plays perfect most of the time, I found ways where I could beat it. It wasn't a problem with my code, simply a problem with the way I had the AI choose it's path. Then I decided to have it choose the tree with either the maximum wins for the computer or the maximum losses for the human, whichever was more. This made it perform BETTER, but still not perfect. I could still beat it. So I have two ideas and I'm hoping for input on which is better: 1) Instead of maximizing the wins or losses, instead I could assign values of 1 for a win, 0 for a draw, and -1 for a loss. Then choosing the tree with the highest value will be the best move because that next node can't be a move that results in a loss. It's an easy change in the board generation, but it retains the same search space and memory usage. Or... 2) During board generation, if there is a board such that either X or O will win in their next move, only the child that prevents that win will be generated. No other child nodes will be considered, and then generation will proceed as normal after that. It shrinks the size of the tree, but then I have to implement an algorithm to determine if there is a one move win and I think that can only be done in linear time (making board generation a lot slower I think?) Which is better, or is there an even better solution?

    Read the article

  • How the "migrations" approach makes database continuous integration possible

    - by David Atkinson
    Testing a database upgrade script as part of a continuous integration process will only work if there is an easy way to automate the generation of the upgrade scripts. There are two common approaches to managing upgrade scripts. The first is to maintain a set of scripts as-you-go-along. Many SQL developers I've encountered will store these in a folder prefixed numerically to ensure they are ordered as they are intended to be run. Occasionally there is an accompanying document or a batch file that ensures that the scripts are run in the defined order. Writing these scripts during the course of development requires discipline. It's all too easy to load up the table designer and to make a change directly to the development database, rather than to save off the ALTER statement that is required when the same change is made to production. This discipline can add considerable overhead to the development process. However, come the end of the project, everything is ready for final testing and deployment. The second development paradigm is to not do the above. Changes are made to the development database without considering the incremental update scripts required to effect the changes. At the end of the project, the SQL developer or DBA, is tasked to work out what changes have been made, and to hand-craft the upgrade scripts retrospectively. The end of the project is the wrong time to be doing this, as the pressure is mounting to ship the product. And where data deployment is involved, it is prudent not to feel rushed. Schema comparison tools such as SQL Compare have made this latter technique more bearable. These tools work by analyzing the before and after states of a database schema, and calculating the SQL required to transition the database. Problem solved? Not entirely. Schema comparison tools are huge time savers, but they have their limitations. There are certain changes that can be made to a database that can't be determined purely from observing the static schema states. If a column is split, how do we determine the algorithm required to copy the data into the new columns? If a NOT NULL column is added without a default, how do we populate the new field for existing records in the target? If we rename a table, how do we know we've done a rename, as we could equally have dropped a table and created a new one? All the above are examples of situations where developer intent is required to supplement the script generation engine. SQL Source Control 3 and SQL Compare 10 introduced a new feature, migration scripts, allowing developers to add custom scripts to replace the default script generation behavior. These scripts are committed to source control alongside the schema changes, and are associated with one or more changesets. Before this capability was introduced, any schema change that required additional developer intent would break any attempt at auto-generation of the upgrade script, rendering deployment testing as part of continuous integration useless. SQL Compare will now generate upgrade scripts not only using its diffing engine, but also using the knowledge supplied by developers in the guise of migration scripts. In future posts I will describe the necessary command line syntax to leverage this feature as part of an automated build process such as continuous integration.

    Read the article

  • NHibernate Generators

    - by Dan
    What is the best tool for generating Entity Class and/or hbm files and/or sql script for NHibernate. This list below is from http://www.hibernate.org/365.html, which is the best any why? Moregen Free, Open Source (GPL) O/R Generator that can merge into existing Visual Studio Projects. Also merges changes to generated classes. NConstruct Lite Free tool for generating NHibernate O/R mapping source code. Different databases support (Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle, Access). GENNIT NHibernate Code Generator Free/Commercial Web 2.0 code generation of NHibernate code using WYSIWYG online UML designer. GenWise Studio with NHibernate Template Commercial product; Imports your existing database and generates all XML and Classes, including factories. It can also generate a asp.net web-application for your NHibernate BO-Layer automatically. HQL Analyzer and hbm.xml GUI Editor ObjectMapper by Mats Helander is a mapping GUI with NHibernate support MyGeneration is a template-based code generator GUI. Its template library includes templates for generating mapping files and classes from a database. AndroMDA is an open-source code generation framework that uses Model Driven Architecture (MDA) to transform UML models into deployable components. It supports generation of data access layers that use NHibernate as their persistence framework. CodeSmith Template for NH NHibernate Helper Kit is a VS2005 add-in to generate classes and mapping files. NConstruct - Intelligent Software Factory Commercial product; Full .NET C# source code generation for all tiers of the information system trough simple wizard procedure. O/R mapping based on NHibernate. For both WinForms and ASP.NET 2.0.

    Read the article

  • Moses v1.0 multi language ini file

    - by Milan Kocic
    I was working with mosesserver 0.91 and everything works fine but now there is version 1.0 and nothing is same as before. Here is my situation: I want to have multi language translation from arabic to english and from english to arabic. All data and configuration file I have works with 0.91 version of mosesserver. Here is my config file: ------------------------------------------------- ######################### ### MOSES CONFIG FILE ### ######################### # D - decoding path, R - reordering model, L - language model [translation-systems] ar-en D 0 R 0 L 0 en-ar D 1 R 1 L 1 # input factors [input-factors] 0 # mapping steps [mapping] 0 T 0 1 T 1 # translation tables: table type (hierarchical(0), textual (0), binary (1)), source-factors, target-factors, number of scores, file # OLD FORMAT is still handled for back-compatibility # OLD FORMAT translation tables: source-factors, target-factors, number of scores, file # OLD FORMAT a binary table type (1) is assumed [ttable-file] 1 0 0 5 /mnt/models/ar-en/phrase-table/phrase-table 1 0 0 5 /mnt/models/en-ar/phrase-table/phrase-table # no generation models, no generation-file section # language models: type(srilm/irstlm), factors, order, file [lmodel-file] 1 0 5 /mnt/models/ar-en/language-model/en.qblm.mm 1 0 5 /mnt/models/en-ar/language-model/ar.lm.d1.blm.mm # limit on how many phrase translations e for each phrase f are loaded # 0 = all elements loaded [ttable-limit] 20 # distortion (reordering) files [distortion-file] 0-0 wbe-msd-bidirectional-fe-allff 6 /mnt/models/ar-en/reordering-table/reordering-table.wbe-msd-bidirectional-fe.gz 0-0 wbe-msd-bidirectional-fe-allff 6 /mnt/models/en-ar/reordering-model/reordering-table.wbe-msd-bidirectional-fe.gz # distortion (reordering) weight [weight-d] 0.3 0.3 # lexicalised distortion weights [weight-lr] 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 # language model weights [weight-l] 0.5000 0.5000 # translation model weights [weight-t] 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 # no generation models, no weight-generation section # word penalty [weight-w] -1 -1 [distortion-limit] 12 --------------------------------------------------------- So please can someone help me and rewrite this config file so it can work in version 1.0. And i need some python sample code of translation. I am using xmlrpc in python and earler I sent http request with: import xmlrpclib client = xmlrpclib.ServerProxy('http://localhost:8080') client.translate({'text': 'some text', 'system': 'en-ar'}) but now seems there is no more 'system' parameter and moses use always default settings.

    Read the article

  • GC output clarification

    - by elec
    I'm running a java application with the following settings: -XX:+CMSParallelRemarkEnabled -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+UseParNewGC -XX:+PrintGCApplicationStoppedTime -XX:+PrintGCApplicationConcurrentTime -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps -XX:+PrintGCDateStamps -XX:+PrintHeapAtGC -XX:+PrintTenuringDistribution I'm not sure how to interpret the related gc logs(below). In particular: Heap after GC invocations=31 (full 3): does this mean there were 31 minor GCs, and 3 full GCs ? What triggers the several consecutive lines of Total time for which the application threads were stopped and Application Time ? Is it possible to get the time stamps associated with each of these lines ? GC logs: Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0046910 seconds Application time: 0.7946670 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0002900 seconds Application time: 1.0153640 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0002780 seconds Application time: 1.0161890 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0002760 seconds Application time: 1.0145990 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0002950 seconds Application time: 0.9999800 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0002770 seconds Application time: 1.0151640 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0002730 seconds Application time: 0.9996590 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0002880 seconds Application time: 0.9624290 seconds {Heap before GC invocations=30 (full 3): par new generation total 131008K, used 130944K [0x00000000eac00000, 0x00000000f2c00000, 0x00000000f2c00000) eden space 130944K, 100% used [0x00000000eac00000, 0x00000000f2be0000, 0x00000000f2be0000) from space 64K, 0% used [0x00000000f2bf0000, 0x00000000f2bf0000, 0x00000000f2c00000) to space 64K, 0% used [0x00000000f2be0000, 0x00000000f2be0000, 0x00000000f2bf0000) concurrent mark-sweep generation total 131072K, used 48348K [0x00000000f2c00000, 0x00000000fac00000, 0x00000000fac00000) concurrent-mark-sweep perm gen total 30000K, used 19518K [0x00000000fac00000, 0x00000000fc94c000, 0x0000000100000000) 2010-05-11T09:30:13.888+0100: 384.955: [GC 384.955: [ParNew Desired survivor size 32768 bytes, new threshold 0 (max 0) : 130944K-0K(131008K), 0.0052470 secs] 179292K-48549K(262080K), 0.0053030 secs] [Times: user=0.00 sys=0.00, real=0.01 secs] Heap after GC invocations=31 (full 3): par new generation total 131008K, used 0K [0x00000000eac00000, 0x00000000f2c00000, 0x00000000f2c00000) eden space 130944K, 0% used [0x00000000eac00000, 0x00000000eac00000, 0x00000000f2be0000) from space 64K, 0% used [0x00000000f2be0000, 0x00000000f2be0000, 0x00000000f2bf0000) to space 64K, 0% used [0x00000000f2bf0000, 0x00000000f2bf0000, 0x00000000f2c00000) concurrent mark-sweep generation total 131072K, used 48549K [0x00000000f2c00000, 0x00000000fac00000, 0x00000000fac00000) concurrent-mark-sweep perm gen total 30000K, used 19518K [0x00000000fac00000, 0x00000000fc94c000, 0x0000000100000000) } Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0056410 seconds Application time: 0.0475220 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0001800 seconds Application time: 1.0174830 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0003820 seconds Application time: 1.0126350 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0002750 seconds Application time: 1.0155910 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0002680 seconds Application time: 1.0155580 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0002880 seconds Application time: 1.0155480 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0002970 seconds Application time: 0.9896810 seconds

    Read the article

  • genStrAsCharArray optimisation benefits

    - by Rich
    Hi I am looking into the options available to me for optimising the performance of JBoss 5.1.0. One of the options I am looking at is setting genStrAsCharArray to true in <JBOSS_HOME>/server/<PROFILE>/deployers/jbossweb.deployer/web.xml. This affects the generation of .java code from .JSPs. The comment describes this flag as: Should text strings be generated as char arrays, to improve performance in some cases? I have a few questions about this. Is this the generation of Strings in the dynamic parts of the JSP page (ie each time the page is called) or is it the generation of Strings in the static parts (ie when the .java is built from the JSP)? "in some cases" - which cases are these? What are the situations where the performance is worse? Does this speed up the generation of the .java, the compilation of the .class or the execution of the .class? At a more technical level (and the answer to this will probably depend on the answer to part 1), why can the use of char arrays improve performance? Thanks in advance Rich

    Read the article

  • Cloud Based Load Testing Using TF Service &amp; VS 2013

    - by Tarun Arora [Microsoft MVP]
    Originally posted on: http://geekswithblogs.net/TarunArora/archive/2013/06/30/cloud-based-load-testing-using-tf-service-amp-vs-2013.aspx One of the new features announced as part of the Visual Studio 2013 Ultimate Preview is ‘Cloud Based Load Testing’. In this blog post I’ll walk you through, What is Cloud Based Load Testing? How have I been using this feature? – Success story! Where can you find more resources on this feature? What is Cloud Based Load Testing? It goes without saying that performance testing your application not only gives you the confidence that the application will work under heavy levels of stress but also gives you the ability to test how scalable the architecture of your application is. It is important to know how much is too much for your application! Working with various clients in the industry I have realized that the biggest barriers in Load Testing & Performance Testing adoption are, High infrastructure and administration cost that comes with this phase of testing Time taken to procure & set up the test infrastructure Finding use for this infrastructure investment after completion of testing Is cloud the answer? 100% Visual Studio Compatible Scalable and Realistic Start testing in < 2 minutes Intuitive Pay only for what you need Use existing on premise tests on cloud There are a lot of vendors out there offering Cloud Based Load Testing, to name a few, Load Storm Soasta Blaze Meter Blitz And others… The question you may want to ask is, why should you go with Microsoft’s Cloud based Load Test offering. If you are a Microsoft shop or already have investments in Microsoft technologies, you’ll see great benefit in the natural integration this offers with existing Microsoft products such as Visual Studio and Windows Azure. For example, your existing Web tests authored in Visual Studio 2010 or Visual Studio 2012 will run on the cloud without requiring any modifications what so ever. Microsoft’s cloud test rig also supports API based testing, for example, if you are building a WPF application which consumes WCF services, you can write unit tests to invoke the WCF service, these tests can be run on the cloud test rig and loaded with ‘N’ concurrent users for performance testing. If you have your assets already hosted in the Azure and possibly in the same data centre as the Cloud test rig, your Azure app will not incur a usage cost because of the generated traffic since the traffic is coming from the same data centre. The licensing or pricing information on Microsoft’s cloud based Load test service is yet to be announced, but I would expect this to be priced attractively to match the market competition.   The only additional configuration required for running load tests on Microsoft Cloud based Load Tests service is to select the Test run location as Run tests using Visual Studio Team Foundation Service, How have I been using Microsoft’s Cloud based Load Test Service? I have been part of the Microsoft Cloud Based Load Test Service advisory council for the last 7 months. This gave the opportunity to see the product shape up from concept to working solution. I was also the first person outside of Microsoft to try this offering out. This gave me the opportunity to test real world application at various clients using the Microsoft Load Test Service and provide real world feedback to the Microsoft product team. One of the most recent systems I tested using the Load Test Service has been an insurance quote generation engine. This insurance quote generation engine is,   hosted in Windows Azure expected to get quote requests from across the globe expected to handle 5 Million quote requests in a day (not clear how this load will be distributed across the day) There was no way, I could simulate such kind of load from on premise without standing up additional hardware. But Microsoft’s Cloud based Load Test service allowed me to test my key performance testing scenarios, i.e. Simulate expected Load, Endurance Testing, Threshold Testing and Testing for Latency. Simulating expected load: approach to devising a load pattern My approach to devising a load test pattern has been to run the test scenario with 1 user to figure out the response time. Then work out how many users are required to reach the target load. So, for example, to invoke 1 quote from the quote engine software takes 0.5 seconds. Now if you do the math,   1 quote request by 1 user = 0.5 seconds   quotes generated by 1 user in 24 hour = 1 * (((2 * 60) * 60) * 24) = 172,800   quotes generated by 30 users in 24 hours = 172,800 * 30 =  5,184,000 This was a very simple example, if your application requires more concurrent users to test scenario’s such as caching, etc then you can devise your own load pattern, some examples of load test patterns can be found here.  Endurance Testing To test for endurance, I loaded the quote generation engine with an expected fixed user load and ran the test for very long duration such as over 48 hours and observed the affect of the long running test on the Azure infrastructure. Currently Microsoft Load Test service does not support metrics from the machine under test. I used Azure diagnostics to begin with, but later started using Cerebrata Azure Diagnostics Manager to capture the metrics of the machine under test. Threshold Testing To figure out how much user load the application could cope with before falling on its belly, I opted to step load the quote generation engine by incrementing user load with different variations of incremental user load per minute till the application crashed out and forced an IIS reset. Testing for Latency Currently the Microsoft Load Test service does not support generating geographically distributed load, I however, deployed the insurance quote generation engine in different Azure data centres and ran the same set of performance tests to measure for latency. Because I could compare load test results from different runs by exporting the results to excel (this feature is provided out of the box right from Visual Studio 2010) I could see the different in response times. More resources on Microsoft Cloud based Load Test Service A few important links to get you started, Download Visual Studio Ultimate 2013 Preview Getting started guide for load testing using Team Foundation Service Troubleshooting guide for FAQs and known issues Team Foundation Service forum for questions and support Detailed demo and presentation (link to Tech-Ed session recording) Detailed demo and presentation (link to Build session recording) There a few limits on the usage of Microsoft Cloud based Load Test service that you can read about here. If you have any feedback on Microsoft Cloud based Load Test service, feel free to share it with the product team via the Visual Studio User Voice forum. I hope you found this useful. Thank you for taking the time out and reading this blog post. If you enjoyed the post, remember to subscribe to http://feeds.feedburner.com/TarunArora. Stay tuned!

    Read the article

  • ANTS Memory Profiler 7.0

    - by James Michael Hare
    I had always been a fan of ANTS products (Reflector is absolutely invaluable, and their performance profiler is great as well – very easy to use!), so I was curious to see what the ANTS Memory Profiler could show me. Background While a performance profiler will track how much time is typically spent in each unit of code, a memory profiler gives you much more detail on how and where your memory is being consumed and released in a program. As an example, I’d been working on a data access layer at work to call a market data web service.  This web service would take a list of symbols to quote and would return back the quote data.  To help consolidate the thousands of web requests per second we get and reduce load on the web services, we implemented a 5-second cache of quote data.  Not quite long enough to where customers will typically notice a quote go “stale”, but just long enough to be able to collapse multiple quote requests for the same symbol in a short period of time. A 5-second cache may not sound like much, but it actually pays off by saving us roughly 42% of our web service calls, while still providing relatively up-to-date information.  The question is whether or not the extra memory involved in maintaining the cache was worth it, so I decided to fire up the ANTS Memory Profiler and take a look at memory usage. First Impressions The main thing I’ve always loved about the ANTS tools is their ease of use.  Pretty much everything is right there in front of you in a way that makes it easy for you to find what you need with little digging required.  I’ve worked with other, older profilers before (that shall remain nameless other than to hint it was created by a very large chip maker) where it was a mind boggling experience to figure out how to do simple tasks. Not so with AMP.  The opening dialog is very straightforward.  You can choose from here whether to debug an executable, a web application (either in IIS or from VS’s web development server), windows services, etc. So I chose a .NET Executable and navigated to the build location of my test harness.  Then began profiling. At this point while the application is running, you can see a chart of the memory as it ebbs and wanes with allocations and collections.  At any given point in time, you can take snapshots (to compare states) zoom in, or choose to stop at any time.  Snapshots Taking a snapshot also gives you a breakdown of the managed memory heaps for each generation so you get an idea how many objects are staying around for extended periods of time (as an object lives and survives collections, it gets promoted into higher generations where collection becomes less frequent). Generating a snapshot brings up an analysis view with very handy graphs that show your generation sizes.  Almost all my memory is in Generation 1 in the managed memory component of the first graph, which is good news to me, because Gen 2 collections are much rarer.  I once3 made the mistake once of caching data for 30 minutes and found it didn’t get collected very quick after I released my reference because it had been promoted to Gen 2 – doh! Analysis It looks like (from the second pie chart) that the majority of the allocations were in the string class.  This also is expected for me because the majority of the memory allocated is in the web service responses, so it doesn’t seem the entities I’m adapting to (to prevent being too tightly coupled to the web service proxy classes, which can change easily out from under me) aren’t taking a significant portion of memory. I also appreciate that they have clear summary text in key places such as “No issues with large object heap fragmentation were detected”.  For novice users, this type of summary information can be critical to getting them to use a tool and develop a good working knowledge of it. There is also a handy link at the bottom for “What to look for on the summary” which loads a web page of help on key points to look for. Clicking over to the session overview, it’s easy to compare the samples at each snapshot to see how your memory is growing, shrinking, or staying relatively the same.  Looking at my snapshots, I’m pretty happy with the fact that memory allocation and heap size seems to be fairly stable and in control: Once again, you can check on the large object heap, generation one heap, and generation two heap across each snapshot to spot trends. Back on the analysis tab, we can go to the [Class List] button to get an idea what classes are making up the majority of our memory usage.  As was little surprise to me, System.String was the clear majority of my allocations, though I found it surprising that the System.Reflection.RuntimeMehtodInfo came in second.  I was curious about this, so I selected it and went into the [Instance Categorizer].  This view let me see where these instances to RuntimeMehtodInfo were coming from. So I scrolled back through the graph, and discovered that these were being held by the System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactoryRefCache and I was satisfied this was just an artifact of my WCF proxy. I also like that down at the bottom of the Instance Categorizer it gives you a series of filters and offers to guide you on which filter to use based on the problem you are trying to find.  For example, if I suspected a memory leak, I might try to filter for survivors in growing classes.  This means that for instances of a class that are growing in memory (more are being created than cleaned up), which ones are survivors (not collected) from garbage collection.  This might allow me to drill down and find places where I’m holding onto references by mistake and not freeing them! Finally, if you want to really see all your instances and who is holding onto them (preventing collection), you can go to the “Instance Retention Graph” which creates a graph showing what references are being held in memory and who is holding onto them. Visual Studio Integration Of course, VS has its own profiler built in – and for a free bundled profiler it is quite capable – but AMP gives a much cleaner and easier-to-use experience, and when you install it you also get the option of letting it integrate directly into VS. So once you go back into VS after installation, you’ll notice an ANTS menu which lets you launch the ANTS profiler directly from Visual Studio.   Clicking on one of these options fires up the project in the profiler immediately, allowing you to get right in.  It doesn’t integrate with the Visual Studio windows themselves (like the VS profiler does), but still the plethora of information it provides and the clear and concise manner in which it presents it makes it well worth it. Summary If you like the ANTS series of tools, you shouldn’t be disappointed with the ANTS Memory Profiler.  It was so easy to use that I was able to jump in with very little product knowledge and get the information I was looking it for. I’ve used other profilers before that came with 3-inch thick tomes that you had to read in order to get anywhere with the tool, and this one is not like that at all.  It’s built for your everyday developer to get in and find their problems quickly, and I like that! Tweet Technorati Tags: Influencers,ANTS,Memory,Profiler

    Read the article

  • Is there a resource that explains the benefits of layered programming?

    - by P.Brian.Mackey
    Some developers I know favor what I would call a procedural programming style. I recognize that procedural programming has its uses, albeit not in the business application world of .NET programming. So let's say we have a winform application with a buttonclick event. The buttonclick handles everything from the UI configuration to the database call and data manipulation. So you end up with a method that is 100's of lines of code long. Outside the fact that this code can't be considered test-able for various reasons, this style of programming is fragile to change. I can talk bout OO, Anti-patterns, etc. The problem is that any distinct topic I can dream up requires a great deal of explanation to understand the potential benefits. Outside of finding a new job (lots of businesses program this way), how can I teach these kinds of developers how to write better code? Obviously we can't sit around a round table and discuss pro's and con's all day due to time constraints and real work that has to be done. Although, training and intense training is the only thing I can think of to fix these problems. Not to say I write perfect code, I most certainly do not. I do believe there are certain best practices that should be followed as a rule E.G. OO in the context of .NET. The most common excuse I hear is "we can't write code fast enough if we do it like that".

    Read the article

  • Grid-Based 2D Lighting Problems

    - by Lemoncreme
    I am aware this question has been asked before, but unfortunately I am new to the language, so the complicated explanations I've found do not help me in the least. I need a lighting engine for my game, and I've tried some procedural lighting systems. This method works the best: if (light[xx - 1, yy] > light[xx, yy]) light[xx, yy] = light[xx - 1, yy] - lightPass; if (light[xx, yy - 1] > light[xx, yy]) light[xx, yy] = light[xx, yy - 1] - lightPass; if (light[xx + 1, yy] > light[xx, yy]) light[xx, yy] = light[xx + 1, yy] - lightPass; if (light[xx, yy + 1] > light[xx, yy]) light[xx, yy] = light[xx, yy + 1] - lightPass; (Subtracts adjacent values by 'lightPass' variable if they are more bright) (It's in a for() loop) This is all fine and dandy except for a an obvious reason: The system favors whatever comes first in the for() loop This is what the above code looks like applied to my game: If I could get some help on creating a new procedural or otherwise lighting system I would really appreciate it!

    Read the article

  • Gödel, Escher, Bach - Gödel's string

    - by Brad Urani
    In the book Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid by Douglas Hofstadter, the author gives us a representation of the precursor to Gödel's string (Gödel's string's uncle) as: ~Ea,a': (I don't have the book in front of me but I think that's right). All that remains to get Gödel's string is to plug the Gödel number for this string into the free variable a''. What I don't understand is how to get the Gödel number for the functions PROOF-PAIR and ARITHMOQUINE. I understand how to write these functions in a programming language like FlooP (from the book) and could even write them myself in C# or Java, but the scheme that Hofstadter defines for Gödel numbering only applies to TNT (which is just his own syntax for natural number theory) and I don't see any way to write a procedure in TNT since it doesn't have any loops, variable assignments etc. Am I missing the point? Perhaps Gödel's string is not something that can actually be printed, but rather a theoretical string that need not actually be defined? I thought it would be neat to write a computer program that actually prints Gödel's string, or Gödel's string encoded by Gödel numbering (yes, I realize it would have a gazillion digits) but it seems like doing so requires some kind of procedural language and a Gödel numbering system for that procedural language that isn't included in the book. Of course once you had that, you could write a program that plugs random numbers into variable "a" and run procedure PROOF-PAIR on it to test for theoromhood of Gödel's string. If you let it run for a trillion years you might find a derivation that proves Gödel's string.

    Read the article

  • How to monetize and protect a engine's and its framework's copyrights and patents?

    - by Arthur Wulf White
    I created a game engine that handles: Rendering levels with 2d textured curved surfaces Collisions with curved surfaces Animationn paths on and navigation in 2d-sapce I have also made a framework for: Procedural organic level generation with round surfaces Level editing Light weight sprite design The engine and framework are written in AS3 and I am in the process of translating the code into HaXe to better support other platforms. I am also interested in adding Animated curved platforms More advanced level editing features Currently, I have a part time job and any time I spend on this engine is either taken out of my limited free time (I'm a student working to support myself through school) or out my time working at my job. I really believe this engine can make life much easier for people designing Tower Defence games, Shooters and and Platformers while also possibly improving their results. It could also support RTS, RPGs and racing games very well. It continains original algorithms that could be used for procedural generation of organic round and smooth levels. The algorithms I used are new and are not available in any other level editor I've seen. In order to constantly improve the Engine and have it tested thoroughly I think the best route is releasing it to the public. What are the best ways to benefit myself and others with my new framework? I want to have some lisence, allowing me to share the framework and still benefit from it. Any advice would be appreciated. This issue has been on my mind a lot this year. I am hoping to find a solution that will bring me some relief. I am thinking of designing three sample games, releasing them and starting a kickstarter, any advice and thoughts on the matter would be valuable. My goal is like Markus von Broady suggested, to get people involved in developing the engine and let people use it for games for either a symbolic fee or for free and charge for support. That or use some form of croud sourcing. Do I need to hire a lawyer to get some sort of legal document to protect my work?

    Read the article

  • How to assign default values and define unique keys in Entity Framework 4 Designer

    - by csharpnoob
    Hello, I've had a look at the Entity Framework 4. While generating code for the SQL Server 2008 I came to the point where I want to define some default values for some fields. how to define in the designer for a Created DateTime Field the DateTime.Now default value? - Error 54: Default value (DateTime.Now) is not valid for DateTime. The value must be in the form 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.fffZ' how to make for code generation a string Field unique. Like E-Mail or Username can exists only once in the table. I've search alot in the internet and also checked my books Pro Entity Framework 4.0 and Programming Entity Framework. But none of them seems to come up with the default value issue, or using sql commands as default values for database generation. Another thing is, how to prevent on database generation always from droping tables? Instead i want to append non existing fields and keep the data. Thanks for any suggestions.

    Read the article

  • What's the .proto equivalent of List<T> in protobuf-net?

    - by Marc Bollinger
    To keep some consistency, we use code generation for a lot of our object models, and one of the offshoots of that has been generating the .proto files for ProtocolBuffers via a separate generation module. At this point though, I'm stumped at how to implement the generation for when it happens upon a List<T> object. It looks like this is possible via contracts: [ProtoMember(1)] public List<SomeType> MyList {get; set;} but outside of that, I'm not sure how or if it's possible to do this only from creating the .proto file/using the VS custom tool. Any thoughts?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46  | Next Page >