Search Results

Search found 53998 results on 2160 pages for 'asp net webapi'.

Page 398/2160 | < Previous Page | 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405  | Next Page >

  • 398 row datalist slowing down modal open????

    - by Jreeter
    Hey guys I got a weird issue.. I have a datalist that's only loaded on pageload it contains 2 columns a name and date and has 398 rows.. In IE 7 and above(and prob previous version) when I open a modal via a button click it takes almost 5 seconds to open. HOWEVER, if I do not bind this datalist it's MUCH faster.. Also this is only happening in IE, Chrome, Firefox and opera both open the modal instantly with the datalist binded... Josh

    Read the article

  • I need help solving a rather weird error in a WCF service.

    - by Moulde
    Hi.. I have a solution that contains three projects. A main project with my MVC app, a silverlight application and a (silverlight enabled) WCF service project. In my silverlight project i have made a Service Reference to my WCF service. And i pretty much got that working. In my WCF service i have a method that returns an Book object, which got some random fields like title, date etc. In the book class, i have a ICollection field that contains a list of events. The book class is generated using entity framework 4.0, and Lazy Loading is enabled. If i in my getBook(int id) method return a book with the events field not initialized, it works as a charm. But if i initialize the field, i'm getting this error. The server did not provide a meaningful reply; this might be caused by a contract mismatch, a premature session shutdown or an internal server error. I have a few ideas why that is happening, and while writing this i just got another one. The wcf service somehow threw away the reference to the event class. That would be very weird since i have a reference between my main mvc app (with the models) and my WCF service. Since i have enabled lazy loading in EF 4.0, i suspect that it may be the thing generating the error. But i'm not sure why that would be, because i'm not in any way accessing that field. I could understand that i may not be able to access the events field after i recive the object in my silverlight application since the connection between the book object and the entity framework is like broken. Did i mention that Lazy Loading is enabled on my EF instance? And there is no inner exception in the thrown exception. Thanks in advance. Malte Baden Hansen

    Read the article

  • Is a Multi-DAL Approach the way to go here?

    - by Krisc
    Working on the data access / model layer in this little MVC2 project and trying to think things out to future projects. I have a database with some basic tables and I have classes in the model layer that represent them. I obviously need something to connect the two. The easiest is to provide some sort of 'provider' that can run operations on the database and return objects. But this is for a website that would potentially be used "a lot" (I know, very general) so I want to cache results from the data layer and keep the cache updated as new data is generated. This question deals with how best to approach this problem of dual DALS. One that returns cached data when possible and goes to the data layer when there is a cache miss. But more importantly, how to integrate the core provider (thing that goes into database) with the caching layer so that it too can rely on cached objects rather than creating new ones. Right now I have the following interfaces: IDataProvider is used to reach the database. It doesn't concern itself with the meaning of the objects it produces, but simply the way to produce them. interface IDataProvider{ // Select, Update, Create, et cetera access IEnumerable<Entry> GetEntries(); Entry GetEntryById(int id); } IDataManager is a layer that sits on top of the IDataProvider layer and manages the cache interface IDataManager : IDataProvider{ void ClearCache(); } Note that in practice the IDataManager implementation will have useful helper functions to add objects to their related cache stores. (In the future I may define other functions on the interface) I guess what I am looking for is the best way to approach a loop back from the IDataProvider implementations so that they can access the cache. Or a different approach entirely may be in order? I am not very interested in 3rd party products at the moment as I am interested in the design of these things much more than this specific implementation. Edit: I realize the title may be a bit misleading. I apologize for that... not sure what to call this question.

    Read the article

  • Is it possible get the functionality of namespaces inside a class?

    - by CowKingDeluxe
    I have the following code: Public Class Form1 Private Function Step1_Execute() As Boolean Return Step1_Verify() End Function Private Function Step1_Verify() As Boolean Return True End Function Private Function Step2_Execute() As Boolean Return Step2_Verify() End Function Private Function Step2_Verify() As Boolean Return True End Function End Class What I would like to do is be able to separate the code, similar to the following (which obviously doesn't work): Public Class Form1 Namespace Step1 Private Function Step1_Execute() As Boolean Return Step1_Verify() End Function Private Function Step1_Verify() As Boolean Return True End Function End Namespace Namespace Step2 Private Function Step2_Execute() As Boolean Return Step2_Verify() End Function Private Function Step2_Verify() As Boolean Return True End Function End Namespace End Class I would like the functionality of namespaces inside of a class, as in something that would let me call Step2.Execute() instead of having to put Step2_ in front of a whole bunch of functions. I don't want to have to create separate classes / modules for step1, step2, etc. Is there a way that I can accomplish namespace functionality from inside a class?

    Read the article

  • Adding Controls Programatically

    - by Mike Keller
    I have a page I need to build out where depending on the selection the user made on a form on the page prior it displays a different set of questions for them to answer. So say the user selects Reason A from the form on page edit, then it needs to display Questions 1 and 2 on page edit_confirmation. But if they select Reason B then it needs to display Questions 3 and 4. I'm grabbing the reason code from the query string and have a switch statement set up, but I can't find anywhere how to output different controls. If Questions 1 and 2 are supposed to show up, one could be a text box and the other a checkbox, but if questions 3 and 4 are supposed to show up one may need to be a dropdown list and a checkbox.

    Read the article

  • "Cannot use fixed local inside lambda expression"

    - by JulianR
    I have an XNA 3.0 project that compiled just fine in VS2008, but that gives compile errors in VS2010 (with XNA 4.0 CTP). The error: Cannot use fixed local 'depthPtr' inside an anonymous method, lambda expression, or query expression depthPtr is a fixed float* into an array, that is used inside a Parallel.For lambda expression from System.Threading. As I said, this compiled and ran just fine on VS2008, but it does not on VS2010, even when targeting .NET 3.5. Has this changed in .NET 4.0, and even so, shouldn't it still compile when I choose .NET 3.5 as the target framework? Searching for the term "Cannot use fixed local" yields exactly one (useless) result, both in Google and Bing. If this has changed, what is the reason for this? I can imagine capturing a fixed pointer-type in a closure could get a bit weird, is that why? So I'm guessing this is bad practice? And before anyone asks: no, the use of pointers is not absolutely critical here. I would still like to know though :)

    Read the article

  • How can I get the assembly last modified date?

    - by Juan Manuel Formoso
    I want to render (for internal debugging/info) the last modified date of an assembly, so I know when was a certain website deployed. Is it possible to get it though reflection? I get the version like this, I'm looking for something similar: Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetName().Version.ToString(); ie: I don't want to open the physical file, get its properties, or something like that, as I'll be rendering it in the master page, and don't want that kind of overhead.

    Read the article

  • How to convert "0" and "1" to false and true

    - by Chris
    I have a method which is connecting to a database via Odbc. The stored procedure which I'm calling has a return value which from the database side is a 'Char'. Right now I'm grabbing that return value as a string and using it in a simple if statement. I really don't like the idea of comparing a string like this when only two values can come back from the database, 0 and 1. OdbcCommand fetchCommand = new OdbcCommand(storedProc, conn); fetchCommand.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure; fetchCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@column ", myCustomParameter); fetchCommand.Parameters.Add("@myReturnValue", OdbcType.Char, 1). Direction = ParameterDirection.Output; fetchCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); string returnValue = fetchCommand.Parameters["@myReturnValue"].Value.ToString(); if (returnValue == "1") { return true; } What would be the proper way to handle this situation. I've tried 'Convert.ToBoolean()' which seemed like the obvious answer but I ran into the 'String was not recognized as a valid Boolean. ' exception being thrown. Am I missing something here, or is there another way to make '1' and '0' act like true and false? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Reflection and Generics get value of property

    - by GigaPr
    Hi i am trying to implement a generic method which allows to output csv file public static void WriteToCsv<T>(List<T> list) where T : new() { const string attachment = "attachment; filename=PersonList.csv"; HttpContext.Current.Response.Clear(); HttpContext.Current.Response.ClearHeaders(); HttpContext.Current.Response.ClearContent(); HttpContext.Current.Response.AddHeader("content-disposition", attachment); HttpContext.Current.Response.ContentType = "text/csv"; HttpContext.Current.Response.AddHeader("Pragma", "public"); bool isFirstRow = true; foreach (T item in list) { //Get public properties PropertyInfo[] propertyInfo = item.GetType().GetProperties(); while (isFirstRow) { WriteColumnName(propertyInfo); isFirstRow = false; } Type type = typeof (T); StringBuilder stringBuilder = new StringBuilder(); foreach (PropertyInfo info in propertyInfo) { //string value ???? I am trying to get the value of the property info for the item object } HttpContext.Current.Response.Write(stringBuilder.ToString()); HttpContext.Current.Response.Write(Environment.NewLine); } HttpContext.Current.Response.End(); } but I am not able to get the value of the object's property Any suggestion? Thanks

    Read the article

  • FaceBook like error

    - by user1150440
    I am using the following code in Page_Load Dim metaTagDesc As New HtmlMeta() 'Create a new instance of META tag object Dim metaTagKeywords As New HtmlMeta() Dim metaTagKeywords1 As New HtmlMeta() Dim metaTagKeywords2 As New HtmlMeta() metaTagDesc.Attributes.Add("property", "og:title") ' Add attributes to the META tag object for identification metaTagDesc.Attributes.Add("content", _table.Rows(0).Item(2)) metaTagKeywords.Attributes.Add("property", "og:type") metaTagKeywords.Attributes.Add("content", "website") metaTagKeywords1.Attributes.Add("property", "og:url") metaTagKeywords1.Attributes.Add("content", "http://citizen.tricedeals.com/Reports/" & _table.Rows(0).Item(0)) metaTagKeywords2.Attributes.Add("property", "og:image") metaTagKeywords2.Attributes.Add("content", "http://citizen.tricedeals.com/ProfilePictures/" & _table.Rows(0).Item(1) & ".jpg") Page.Header.Controls.Add(metaTagDesc) Page.Header.Controls.Add(metaTagKeywords) Page.Header.Controls.Add(metaTagKeywords1) Page.Header.Controls.Add(metaTagKeywords2) But i keep getting this error..."Your og:type object name has disallowed characters in it. It must match [a-z][a-z0-9._]*" Why?

    Read the article

  • How to add jarray Object into JObject

    - by user2882431
    How to add JArray into JObject? I am getting an exception when changing the jarrayObj into JObject. parameterNames = "Test1,Test2,Test3"; JArray jarrayObj = new JArray(); foreach (string parameterName in parameterNames) { jarrayObj.Add(parameterName); } JObject ObjDelParams = new JObject(); ObjDelParams["_delete"] = jarrayObj; JObject UpdateAccProfile = new JObject( ObjDelParams, new JProperty("birthday", txtBday), new JProperty("email", txtemail)) I need output in this form: { "_delete": ["Test1","Test2","Test3"], "birthday":"2011-05-06", "email":"[email protected]" }

    Read the article

  • Studying for the 70-564 exam

    - by Pete
    Besides the searching MSDN with the course outline, there is little out there to help prepare for the 70-564 exam . Some say that using the 70-547 Training Kit book helps, but does anyone know (as a rough percentage) how much of the 70-547 book covers the 70-564 exam?

    Read the article

  • Updating my database

    - by Malcolm
    I am new with the subsonic, and I have a problem when trying to update the database from the sql server. I have created a gridview by still is not returning the updates results. can you please help me? its getting an error code on dc.AddMostaHse(); (Cannot implicity convert type 'void to 'object') Here is the code being done of DataAccess.cs page public void AddMostaHse() { Mosta.MostaHSE1 xx = new MostaHSE1(); xx.ID = 94; xx.FunctionLocation = "lza94"; xx.acno = 12; xx.Save(); } Binding it with the gridview. { DataAccess dc = new DataAccess(); gvtest.DataSource = dc.AddMostaHse(); gvtest.DataBind(); }

    Read the article

  • What is the pros and cons in using FormsAuthentication to persist login cookie?

    - by stacker
    What is the pros and cons in using FormsAuthentication to persist a login cookie? I see that StackOverflow ignore FormsAuthentication and instead implemented a different strategy to persist a login cookie. Pros Out of the box implementation for persistent login feature. Cons The login feature depends on the machine key which mean that I need to make sure that the machine key is the same on all the servers in the farm. The cookie contains wired encrypted values that don't really make sense to store in the cookie.

    Read the article

  • Custom Error page | Redirect type =301?

    - by FlopScientist
    I guess this may be a novice question ( Which I am :) ). While redirecting user to custom error page, for e.g. 404, to tell that page wasn't found, the type of this redirect is 302. <error statusCode="404" redirect="/Utility/Error404.aspx" /> <error statusCode="400" redirect="/Utility/Error404.aspx" /> Is it possible to make this redirect 301 through Web.config? Thanks in advance to you all code maniacs.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405  | Next Page >