Search Results

Search found 13723 results on 549 pages for 'constraint programming'.

Page 4/549 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Reinventing the Wheel, why should I?

    - by Mercfh
    So I have this problem, it may be my OCD (i have OCD it's not severe.....but It makes me very..lets say specific about certain things, programming being one of them) or it may be the fact that I graduated college and still feel "meh" at programming. Reading This made me think "OH thats me!" but thats not really my main problem. My big problem is....anytime im using a high level language/API/etc. I always think to myself that im not really "programming". I know I know...it sounds stupid. But Like I feel like....if i can't figure out how to do it at the lowest level then Im not really "understanding" it. I do this for just about every new technology I learn. I look at the lowest level and try to understand it. Sometimes I do.....most of the time I don't, I mean i've only really been programming for 4 years (at college, if you even call it programming.....our university's program was "meh"). For instance I do a little bit of embedded programming (with the Atmel AVR 8bits/Arduino stuff). And I can't bring myself to use the C compiler, even though it's 8 million times easier than using assembly......it's stupid I know... Anyone else feel like this, I think it's just my OCD that makes me feel this way....but has anyone else ever felt like they need to go down to the lowest level of the language to even be satisfied with using it? I apologize for the very very odd question, but I think it really hinders me in getting deep seeded into a programming language and making a real application of my own. (it's silly I know)

    Read the article

  • How difficult is it to change from Embedded programming to a high level programming [on hold]

    - by anudeep shetty
    I have a background in Computer Science. I worked on Embedded programming on Linux file systems, after I finished my Bachelor's degree, for over a year. After that I pursued my masters where most of my course choices involved working on web, java and databases. Now I have an offer to work with a company that is offering a job to work on the OS level. The company is pretty good but I am feeling that my Masters has gone to waste. I wanted to know is it common that a Computer Science major works on low-level coding and is there a possibility that I can work in this company for some years and then move onto an opportunity where I can work on high-level coding? Also is working on low-level programming a safe choice in terms of job opportunities?

    Read the article

  • Ways to earn money through programming and/or programming knowledge [closed]

    - by Jason Swett
    It occurred to me today that it might be useful to make a list of all the ways to earn money through either actual programming or just programming knowledge. I imagine it's probably a finite list as long as you stick to a reasonable level of granularity. Here's what I have so far: Trading your time for money (i.e. having a job or being a freelancer) Building your own software product (a full-fledged startup or a tiny mobile app or whatever) Giving talks at conferences and meetups Teaching students in a classroom Writing a book or blog (these are products, but non-software products) I've probably missed at least a few. What else is there? (I'm not sure whether this is an appropriate question, by the way. I think I would select the best answer based on how practical/original/interesting/numerous your suggestions are.)

    Read the article

  • What can I do about a SQL Server ghost FK constraint?

    - by rcook8601
    I'm having some trouble with a SQL Server 2005 database that seems like it's keeping a ghost constraint around. I've got a script that drops the constraint in question, does some work, and then re-adds the same constraint. Normally, it works fine. Now, however, it can't re-add the constraint because the database says that it already exists, even though the drop worked fine! Here are the queries I'm working with: alter table individual drop constraint INDIVIDUAL_EMP_FK ALTER TABLE INDIVIDUAL ADD CONSTRAINT INDIVIDUAL_EMP_FK FOREIGN KEY (EMPLOYEE_ID) REFERENCES EMPLOYEE After the constraint is dropped, I've made sure that the object really is gone by using the following queries: select object_id('INDIVIDUAL_EMP_FK') select * from sys.foreign_keys where name like 'individual%' Both return no results (or null), but when I try to add the query again, I get: The ALTER TABLE statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "INDIVIDUAL_EMP_FK". Trying to drop it gets me a message that it doesn't exist. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Finding a new programming language for web development?

    - by Xeoncross
    I'm wondering if there are any un-biased resources that give good, specific overviews of programming languages and their intended goals. I would like to learn a new language, but visiting the sites of each language isn't working. Each one talks about how great it is without much mention of it's weaknesses or specific goals. Ruby is a dynamic, open source programming language with a focus on simplicity and productivity. Python is a programming language that lets you work more quickly and integrate your systems more effectively. Having been a PHP developer for years, Vic Cherubini sums up my plight well: I knew PHP well, had my own framework, and could work quickly to get something up and running. I programmed like this throughout the MVC revolution. I got better and better jobs (read: better paying, better title) as a PHP developer, but all along the way realizing that the code I wrote on my own time was great, and the code I worked with at work was horrible. Like, worse than horrible. Atrocious. OS Commerce level bad. Having side projects kept me sane, because the code I worked with at work made me miserable. This is why I'm retiring from PHP for my side projects and new programming ventures. I'm spent with PHP. Exhausted, if you will. I've reached a level where I think I'm at the top with it as a language and if I don't move on to a new language soon, I'll be done completely with programming and I do not want that. Languages I've looked at include JavaScript (for node.js), Ruby, Python, & Erlang. I've even thought about Scala or C++. The problem is figuring out which ones are built to handle my needs the best. So where can I go to skip the hype and get real information about the maturity of a platform, the size of the community, and the strengths & weaknesses of that language. If I know these then picking a language to continue my web development should be easy.

    Read the article

  • pitfalls/disadvantages of functional programming

    - by CrazyJugglerDrummer
    When would you NOT want to use functional programming? What is it not so good at? I am more looking for disadvantages of the paradigm as a whole, not things like "not widely used", or "no good debugger available". Those answers may be correct as of now, but they deal with FP being a new concept (an unavoidable issue) and not any inherent qualities. Related: pitfalls of object oriented programming advantages of functional programming

    Read the article

  • Evolution of mainstream programming languages: simplicity versus complexity.

    - by Giorgio
    I had posted this question on http://stackoverflow.com but I was suggested that it may be more appropriate to post it on this forum. I did a quick search on this site and it seems to me that this question has not been asked yet. Please give me a hint if the topic has been raised already by someone else. Update I have rephrased this question, removed personal opinions and made it shorter. I hope in this way it is better suited for this forum. By looking at the recent development of Java (Java 7) and C++ (C++0x) I see that new features are added to these languages. For sure this makes it easier to use certain programming idioms, adding to the productivity of developers. On the other hand, there might be the following risks A language becomes too big, complex, and difficult to understand. It lacks coherence in the design, e.g. if it mixes different paradigms like object-orientation and functional programming, which might not fit well together. Questions: what is more important to you as a developer: to have a rich language that captures a large collection of programming idioms or to have a small language that aims at coherence and simplicity (of course, with a good deal of libraries and tools accompanying it)? Or is it possible to have both? With respect to these issues: How do you judge the current evolutions of main-stream programming languages like Java or C++? Are they becoming too complex, less intuitive? Do they have enough features? Do they need more? Are they still easy enough to understand and use?

    Read the article

  • Is there a “P” programming language? [closed]

    - by Synetech
    I’m wondering if anybody has made a programming language based on BCPL, named P. There was a language named B that was based on BCPL, followed of course by C, also based on BCPL. I’ve seen plenty of whimsically named programming languages, so I can’t help but be surprised if nobody made one called P. I checked the Wikipedia’s—not exactly comprehensive—list of programming languages, and while there are three languages named L (none of which are related to BCPL), there are none called P—in fact, it is one of the only letters not used as a name. (Google is useless for one-letter query terms.) Does anybody know if a P has been made, even as a lark. (Yes, I know about P#, but that is based on Prolog, not BCPL; there is one called P, but it is also not related to BCPL.)

    Read the article

  • Teaching programming to a non-CS graduate

    - by Shahzada
    I have a couple of friends interested in computer programming, but they're non-CS graduates; some of them have very little experience in software testing field (some of them took some basic software testing courses). I am going to be working with them on teaching basic computer programming, and computer science fundamentals (data structures etc). My questions are; What language should I start with? What are essential computer science topics that I should cover before jumping them into computer programming? What readings can I incorporate to make the topic interesting and non-overwhelming? If we want to spend a year on it, what topics should take priority and must be covered in 12 months? Again, these are non computer science folks, and I want to keep the learning as much fun as possible. Thanks everyone.

    Read the article

  • Are there any non-english programming languages? [closed]

    - by samarudge
    Possible Duplicate: Non-English-based programming languages Not sure if this is the right place to ask this, but I'm going to anyway. Without fail, every programming language I've ever seen, used or heard of has it's keywords based around English. if, else, while, for, query, foreach, image, path, extension, the list goes on, are all based around English words. Are there any languages, or ports of languages that base their core keywords based on non-english words to lower the wall for non-english speaking programmers? This is mostly for intrest (English is my first language so it's no problem for me). Are these languages popular locally (I.E. might a software development house in Germany use a programming language based in German over one based in English).

    Read the article

  • When Programming will become deprecated [closed]

    - by Vibeeshan
    Possible Duplicate: Will programmers be around in a few years? According to the history of programming, with each new generation of software engineering it seems to become easier and easier. Machine Code - Assembly - Programming Languages - easier - more easier - etc. If this situation continues anyone will be able to program (even complex systems). Even now, most of the kids study programming at school (Pascal , VB, etc.). Will be there any jobs called software engineering in future (if everyone know to program). ....and.... What do you think about the future of software development?

    Read the article

  • Which programming language for text editing?

    - by Ali
    I need a programming language for text editing and processing (replace, formatting, regex, string comparison, word processing, text analysis, etc). Which programming language is more powerful and has more functions for this purpose? Since I work PHP for my web projects, I currently use PHP; but the fact is that PHP is a scripting language for web applications, my current project is offline. I am curious if other programming languages such as Perl, Python, C, C++, Java, etc have more functionality for this purpose, and worth of shifting the project?

    Read the article

  • SQL Server script commands to check if object exists and drop it

    - by deadlydog
    Over the past couple years I’ve been keeping track of common SQL Server script commands that I use so I don’t have to constantly Google them.  Most of them are how to check if a SQL object exists before dropping it.  I thought others might find these useful to have them all in one place, so here you go: 1: --=============================== 2: -- Create a new table and add keys and constraints 3: --=============================== 4: IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo') 5: BEGIN 6: CREATE TABLE [dbo].[TableName] 7: ( 8: [ColumnName1] INT NOT NULL, -- To have a field auto-increment add IDENTITY(1,1) 9: [ColumnName2] INT NULL, 10: [ColumnName3] VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL DEFAULT('') 11: ) 12: 13: -- Add the table's primary key 14: ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] ADD CONSTRAINT [PK_TableName] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED 15: ( 16: [ColumnName1], 17: [ColumnName2] 18: ) 19: 20: -- Add a foreign key constraint 21: ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_Name] FOREIGN KEY 22: ( 23: [ColumnName1], 24: [ColumnName2] 25: ) 26: REFERENCES [dbo].[Table2Name] 27: ( 28: [OtherColumnName1], 29: [OtherColumnName2] 30: ) 31: 32: -- Add indexes on columns that are often used for retrieval 33: CREATE INDEX IN_ColumnNames ON [dbo].[TableName] 34: ( 35: [ColumnName2], 36: [ColumnName3] 37: ) 38: 39: -- Add a check constraint 40: ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CH_Name] CHECK (([ColumnName] >= 0.0000)) 41: END 42: 43: --=============================== 44: -- Add a new column to an existing table 45: --=============================== 46: IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS where TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' 47: AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND COLUMN_NAME = 'ColumnName') 48: BEGIN 49: ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] ADD [ColumnName] INT NOT NULL DEFAULT(0) 50: 51: -- Add a description extended property to the column to specify what its purpose is. 52: EXEC sys.sp_addextendedproperty @name=N'MS_Description', 53: @value = N'Add column comments here, describing what this column is for.' , 54: @level0type=N'SCHEMA',@level0name=N'dbo', @level1type=N'TABLE', 55: @level1name = N'TableName', @level2type=N'COLUMN', 56: @level2name = N'ColumnName' 57: END 58: 59: --=============================== 60: -- Drop a table 61: --=============================== 62: IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo') 63: BEGIN 64: DROP TABLE [dbo].[TableName] 65: END 66: 67: --=============================== 68: -- Drop a view 69: --=============================== 70: IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.VIEWS WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'ViewName' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo') 71: BEGIN 72: DROP VIEW [dbo].[ViewName] 73: END 74: 75: --=============================== 76: -- Drop a column 77: --=============================== 78: IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS where TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' 79: AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND COLUMN_NAME = 'ColumnName') 80: BEGIN 81: 82: -- If the column has an extended property, drop it first. 83: IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.fn_listExtendedProperty(N'MS_Description', N'SCHEMA', N'dbo', N'Table', 84: N'TableName', N'COLUMN', N'ColumnName') 85: BEGIN 86: EXEC sys.sp_dropextendedproperty @name=N'MS_Description', 87: @level0type=N'SCHEMA',@level0name=N'dbo', @level1type=N'TABLE', 88: @level1name = N'TableName', @level2type=N'COLUMN', 89: @level2name = N'ColumnName' 90: END 91: 92: ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] DROP COLUMN [ColumnName] 93: END 94: 95: --=============================== 96: -- Drop Primary key constraint 97: --=============================== 98: IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS WHERE CONSTRAINT_TYPE='PRIMARY KEY' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' 99: AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND CONSTRAINT_NAME = 'PK_Name') 100: BEGIN 101: ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] DROP CONSTRAINT [PK_Name] 102: END 103: 104: --=============================== 105: -- Drop Foreign key constraint 106: --=============================== 107: IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS WHERE CONSTRAINT_TYPE='FOREIGN KEY' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' 108: AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND CONSTRAINT_NAME = 'FK_Name') 109: BEGIN 110: ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] DROP CONSTRAINT [FK_Name] 111: END 112: 113: --=============================== 114: -- Drop Unique key constraint 115: --=============================== 116: IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS WHERE CONSTRAINT_TYPE='UNIQUE' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' 117: AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND CONSTRAINT_NAME = 'UNI_Name') 118: BEGIN 119: ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableNames] DROP CONSTRAINT [UNI_Name] 120: END 121: 122: --=============================== 123: -- Drop Check constraint 124: --=============================== 125: IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS WHERE CONSTRAINT_TYPE='CHECK' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' 126: AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND CONSTRAINT_NAME = 'CH_Name') 127: BEGIN 128: ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] DROP CONSTRAINT [CH_Name] 129: END 130: 131: --=============================== 132: -- Drop a column's Default value constraint 133: --=============================== 134: DECLARE @ConstraintName VARCHAR(100) 135: SET @ConstraintName = (SELECT TOP 1 s.name FROM sys.sysobjects s JOIN sys.syscolumns c ON s.parent_obj=c.id 136: WHERE s.xtype='d' AND c.cdefault=s.id 137: AND parent_obj = OBJECT_ID('TableName') AND c.name ='ColumnName') 138: 139: IF @ConstraintName IS NOT NULL 140: BEGIN 141: EXEC ('ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] DROP CONSTRAINT ' + @ConstraintName) 142: END 143: 144: --=============================== 145: -- Example of how to drop dynamically named Unique constraint 146: --=============================== 147: DECLARE @ConstraintName VARCHAR(100) 148: SET @ConstraintName = (SELECT TOP 1 CONSTRAINT_NAME FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS 149: WHERE CONSTRAINT_TYPE='UNIQUE' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' 150: AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND CONSTRAINT_NAME LIKE 'FirstPartOfConstraintName%') 151: 152: IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS WHERE CONSTRAINT_TYPE='UNIQUE' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' 153: AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND CONSTRAINT_NAME = @ConstraintName) 154: BEGIN 155: EXEC ('ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] DROP CONSTRAINT ' + @ConstraintName) 156: END 157: 158: --=============================== 159: -- Check for and drop a temp table 160: --=============================== 161: IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#TableName') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #TableName 162: 163: --=============================== 164: -- Drop a stored procedure 165: --=============================== 166: IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.ROUTINES WHERE ROUTINE_TYPE='PROCEDURE' AND ROUTINE_SCHEMA='dbo' AND 167: ROUTINE_NAME = 'StoredProcedureName') 168: BEGIN 169: DROP PROCEDURE [dbo].[StoredProcedureName] 170: END 171: 172: --=============================== 173: -- Drop a UDF 174: --=============================== 175: IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.ROUTINES WHERE ROUTINE_TYPE='FUNCTION' AND ROUTINE_SCHEMA='dbo' AND 176: ROUTINE_NAME = 'UDFName') 177: BEGIN 178: DROP FUNCTION [dbo].[UDFName] 179: END 180: 181: --=============================== 182: -- Drop an Index 183: --=============================== 184: IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM SYS.INDEXES WHERE name = 'IndexName') 185: BEGIN 186: DROP INDEX TableName.IndexName 187: END 188: 189: --=============================== 190: -- Drop a Schema 191: --=============================== 192: IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.SCHEMATA WHERE SCHEMA_NAME = 'SchemaName') 193: BEGIN 194: EXEC('DROP SCHEMA SchemaName') 195: END And here’s the same code, just not in the little code view window so that you don’t have to scroll it.--=============================== -- Create a new table and add keys and constraints --=============================== IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo') BEGIN CREATE TABLE [dbo].[TableName]  ( [ColumnName1] INT NOT NULL, -- To have a field auto-increment add IDENTITY(1,1) [ColumnName2] INT NULL, [ColumnName3] VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL DEFAULT('') ) -- Add the table's primary key ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] ADD CONSTRAINT [PK_TableName] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED ( [ColumnName1],  [ColumnName2] ) -- Add a foreign key constraint ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_Name] FOREIGN KEY ( [ColumnName1],  [ColumnName2] ) REFERENCES [dbo].[Table2Name]  ( [OtherColumnName1],  [OtherColumnName2] ) -- Add indexes on columns that are often used for retrieval CREATE INDEX IN_ColumnNames ON [dbo].[TableName] ( [ColumnName2], [ColumnName3] ) -- Add a check constraint ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CH_Name] CHECK (([ColumnName] >= 0.0000)) END --=============================== -- Add a new column to an existing table --=============================== IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS where TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND COLUMN_NAME = 'ColumnName') BEGIN ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] ADD [ColumnName] INT NOT NULL DEFAULT(0) -- Add a description extended property to the column to specify what its purpose is. EXEC sys.sp_addextendedproperty @name=N'MS_Description',  @value = N'Add column comments here, describing what this column is for.' ,  @level0type=N'SCHEMA',@level0name=N'dbo', @level1type=N'TABLE', @level1name = N'TableName', @level2type=N'COLUMN', @level2name = N'ColumnName' END --=============================== -- Drop a table --=============================== IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo') BEGIN DROP TABLE [dbo].[TableName] END --=============================== -- Drop a view --=============================== IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.VIEWS WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'ViewName' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo') BEGIN DROP VIEW [dbo].[ViewName] END --=============================== -- Drop a column --=============================== IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS where TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND COLUMN_NAME = 'ColumnName') BEGIN -- If the column has an extended property, drop it first. IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.fn_listExtendedProperty(N'MS_Description', N'SCHEMA', N'dbo', N'Table', N'TableName', N'COLUMN', N'ColumnName') BEGIN EXEC sys.sp_dropextendedproperty @name=N'MS_Description',  @level0type=N'SCHEMA',@level0name=N'dbo', @level1type=N'TABLE', @level1name = N'TableName', @level2type=N'COLUMN', @level2name = N'ColumnName' END ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] DROP COLUMN [ColumnName] END --=============================== -- Drop Primary key constraint --=============================== IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS WHERE CONSTRAINT_TYPE='PRIMARY KEY' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND CONSTRAINT_NAME = 'PK_Name') BEGIN ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] DROP CONSTRAINT [PK_Name] END --=============================== -- Drop Foreign key constraint --=============================== IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS WHERE CONSTRAINT_TYPE='FOREIGN KEY' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND CONSTRAINT_NAME = 'FK_Name') BEGIN ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] DROP CONSTRAINT [FK_Name] END --=============================== -- Drop Unique key constraint --=============================== IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS WHERE CONSTRAINT_TYPE='UNIQUE' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND CONSTRAINT_NAME = 'UNI_Name') BEGIN ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableNames] DROP CONSTRAINT [UNI_Name] END --=============================== -- Drop Check constraint --=============================== IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS WHERE CONSTRAINT_TYPE='CHECK' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND CONSTRAINT_NAME = 'CH_Name') BEGIN ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] DROP CONSTRAINT [CH_Name] END --=============================== -- Drop a column's Default value constraint --=============================== DECLARE @ConstraintName VARCHAR(100) SET @ConstraintName = (SELECT TOP 1 s.name FROM sys.sysobjects s JOIN sys.syscolumns c ON s.parent_obj=c.id WHERE s.xtype='d' AND c.cdefault=s.id  AND parent_obj = OBJECT_ID('TableName') AND c.name ='ColumnName') IF @ConstraintName IS NOT NULL BEGIN EXEC ('ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] DROP CONSTRAINT ' + @ConstraintName) END --=============================== -- Example of how to drop dynamically named Unique constraint --=============================== DECLARE @ConstraintName VARCHAR(100) SET @ConstraintName = (SELECT TOP 1 CONSTRAINT_NAME FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS  WHERE CONSTRAINT_TYPE='UNIQUE' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND CONSTRAINT_NAME LIKE 'FirstPartOfConstraintName%') IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS WHERE CONSTRAINT_TYPE='UNIQUE' AND TABLE_SCHEMA='dbo' AND TABLE_NAME = 'TableName' AND CONSTRAINT_NAME = @ConstraintName) BEGIN EXEC ('ALTER TABLE [dbo].[TableName] DROP CONSTRAINT ' + @ConstraintName) END --=============================== -- Check for and drop a temp table --=============================== IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#TableName') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #TableName --=============================== -- Drop a stored procedure --=============================== IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.ROUTINES WHERE ROUTINE_TYPE='PROCEDURE' AND ROUTINE_SCHEMA='dbo' AND ROUTINE_NAME = 'StoredProcedureName') BEGIN DROP PROCEDURE [dbo].[StoredProcedureName] END --=============================== -- Drop a UDF --=============================== IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.ROUTINES WHERE ROUTINE_TYPE='FUNCTION' AND ROUTINE_SCHEMA='dbo' AND  ROUTINE_NAME = 'UDFName') BEGIN DROP FUNCTION [dbo].[UDFName] END --=============================== -- Drop an Index --=============================== IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM SYS.INDEXES WHERE name = 'IndexName') BEGIN DROP INDEX TableName.IndexName END --=============================== -- Drop a Schema --=============================== IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.SCHEMATA WHERE SCHEMA_NAME = 'SchemaName') BEGIN EXEC('DROP SCHEMA SchemaName') END

    Read the article

  • How important is Programming for a Level Designer?

    - by WryGrin
    I'm currently attending school in a Level Design program, and I was wondering how important programming really is in being a Level Designer? I'm apparently incapable of learning programming (despite my best efforts), and tend to do very well in all other courses 3D modelling, story/character design, narrative and dialogue writing, environmental and conceptual design etc. I'm wondering if my strengths in the other areas are enough (with practice) to let me become a Level Designer, or I'm wasting my time if I can't program? I really want to be a Designer, but I just can't seem to wrap my head around the "language" of programming in general (Java kicks my teeth in even with tutoring and additional work on my own).

    Read the article

  • Pair Programming: Pros and Cons

    - by O.D
    I need some experience reporting from the ones who have done pair programming, I noticed that lots of people recommend it but my experience was that at one point it's more efficient to sit alone, think and then write code than to talk with the other programmer (which can be very annoying to other programmers in the same office), do you agree to this? and if yes can you mention situations where pair programming is less efficient than traditional programming? Actually, I'm more interested in Cons than in Pros, but if it's your own experience I would like to read both, the Cons and the Pros. I would like to read what you think about the Programmer who doesn't have the keyboard, what can he do in the meanwhile other than talking about the concept? or checking the code on the screen?

    Read the article

  • Functional Programming - Does Knowing It Help Job Prospects?

    - by Jetti
    The main language that I use at the moment is C# and I am the most comfortable with it. However, I have started dabbling in F# and Haskell and really enjoy those langauges. I would love to improve my skills in either of those languages over time since it truly is fun for me to use them (as opposed to Ruby, which is hyped as "fun", I just don't get where the fun is, but I digress...). My question is directed at those who have hired/interviewed for programming positions (junior/mid-level): if you see a functional programming language on a resume, does it affect your opinion (whether positive or negatively) of that candidate? My rationale for knowledge of functional programming affecting the view of a candidate is because it can show that the candidate can adapt to different methodologies and take a mulit-dimensional approach to problems rather than the "same old OO approach". (This may be off-base, please let me know if this assumption is as well!)

    Read the article

  • Am I bored with programming? [closed]

    - by user1167074
    I have started programming 2 years back and I have learnt web programming while working for big corporate companies. I was very passionate and I even did couple of side projects which were well appreciated by my friends and colleagues. But for the past 2 months I am not doing anything really interesting with programming, even if I get good ideas I am not feeling like coding, sub consciously I am feeling like "So What?" if I do this project. I would like to know from the more experienced programmers if this is just a phase or am I really missing something? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Reasons for Pair Programming

    - by Jeff Langemeier
    I've worked in a few shops where management has passed the idea of pair programming either to me or another manager/developer, and I can't get behind it at all. From a developer stand-point I can't find a reason why moving to this coding style would be beneficial, nor as a manager of a small team have I seen any benefit. I understand that it helps on basic syntax errors and can be helpful if you need to hash something out, but managers that are out of the programming loop seem to keep seeing it as a way of keeping their designers from going to Facebook or Reddit than as a design tool. As someone close to the development floor that apparently can't quite understand from a book tossed my way or a wiki page on the subject... from a high level management position, what are the benefits of Pair Programming when dealing with Scrum or Agile environments?

    Read the article

  • Topics for covering in-depth programming knowledge

    - by black_belt
    I pursued my bachelors' degree in business administration, but my interest in Information Technology led me to acquire some knowledge of PHP programming and MySQL database. I find programming so interesting that I haven't applied for any job since my graduation. Currently I am staying home and just trying to acquire in-depth knowledge of PHP programming. So far I have developed couple of websites and web applications including Inventory+ Point of Sale Software and an Accounting system for small organizations. I aim to have knowledge that a Computer Science graduate should have, and for that I want to read books but I have no idea where to start from. Could you please suggest me some books and topics that I should study on? Thanks a lot :)

    Read the article

  • Is there a procedural graphical programming environment?

    - by Marc
    I am searching for a graphical programming environment for procedural programming in which you can integrate some or all of the common sources of calculation procedures, such as Excel sheets, MATLAB scripts or even .NET assemblies. I think of something like a flowchart configurator in which you define the procedures via drag& drop using flow-statements (if-else, loops, etc.). Do you know of any systems heading in this direction?

    Read the article

  • Is extreme programming out of date?

    - by KingBabar
    I have stumbled across this graph and I wonder if someone would care to explain the results? As you can see, extreme programming (XP) is practically uninterested and has almost disappeared from searches. The legend is: Blue: Agile Red: Scrum Orange: extreme programming Green: Waterfall source: http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=0-5&q=agile%2Cscrum%2Cextreme%20programming%2Cwaterfall&cmpt=q

    Read the article

  • Is monkeypatching considered good programming practice?

    - by vartec
    I've been under impression, that monkeypatching is more in quick and dirty hack category, rather than standard, good programming practice. While I'd used from time to time to fix minor issues with 3rd party libs, I considered it temporary fix and I'd submit proper patch to the 3rd party project. However, I've seen this technique used as "the normal way" in mainstream projects, for example in Gevent's gevent.monkey module. Has monkeypatching became mainstream, normal, acceptable programming practice? See also: "Monkeypatching For Humans" by Jeff Atwood

    Read the article

  • What non-programming tools do programmers use?

    - by user828584
    I'm reading code complete with the intention of learning how to better structure my code, but I'm also learning a lot about how many aspects of programming something there are that aren't just writing the code. The book talks a lot about problem definition, determining the requirements, defining the structure, designing the code, etc. What tools are used for these non-writing steps of programming? Is there software that will help me design and plan out what I'm going to write before I do?

    Read the article

  • Ideal programming language learning sequence?

    - by Gulshan
    What do you think? What is the ideal programming language learning sequence which will cover most of the heavily used languages and paradigms today as well as help to grasp common programming basics, ideas and practices? You can even suggest learning sequence for paradigms rather than languages. N.B. : This is port of the question I asked in stackoverflow and was closed for being subjective and argumentative.

    Read the article

  • Data structures in functional programming

    - by pwny
    I'm currently playing with LISP (particularly Scheme and Clojure) and I'm wondering how typical data structures are dealt with in functional programming languages. For example, let's say I would like to solve a problem using a graph pathfinding algorithm. How would one typically go about representing that graph in a functional programming language (primarily interested in pure functional style that can be applied to LISP)? Would I just forget about graphs altogether and solve the problem some other way?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >