Search Results

Search found 2657 results on 107 pages for 'mit license'.

Page 4/107 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • On what name should I claim copyright in open source software?

    - by ONOZ
    When I want to use the Apache 2.0 licence in my project, I should include this in the comments of my source code: Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner] Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. What name should I fill in for [name of copyright owner]? I am currently working alone on this project, but I'm going to release the source code so there might be other contributors in the near future.

    Read the article

  • Proprietary software based on MIT license.

    - by Kevin_Jim
    As far as I understand. I can use a project licensed under MIT license into a proprietary software. Am I right? It dosen't force any copyleft and I don't have to say that my project is based on something else. That means I can fork the hell out of it, right? Can someone shed some light over this?

    Read the article

  • Microsoft Public License in commercial Silverlight application?

    - by badra
    I'm developing a commercial silverlight application using some third party libraries that are published under Microsoft Public License (MPL). I have to include the license text into my product which is somewhat strange in an silverlight application. In a normal desktop application I would just include the license als a .txt but I've no idea how to do it in silverlight without including in in an about dialog or something similar. Are there any other issues involved which I missed?

    Read the article

  • Blackberry license screen agreement like Facebook

    - by Dachmt
    Hi, I have a "basic" license agreement screen for now, a Screen with a title set and vertical field containing a textfield, separatorfield and then 2 buttons (accept or decline). The license is pretty long, it's annoying going all the way down (except with the storm it's pretty easy) and I want a kind of popup screen showing the license and the 2 buttons at the bottom. To give you an example, the exact SAME as the Facebook or App World application's license screen agreement! When you scroll the text, it's going a lot faster and it's visualy great. Thank you!

    Read the article

  • Encoding license file for privacy

    - by Swingline Rage
    Hi, We're using XML Digital Signatures for signing and verifying our license keys. The signing works fine and has been running smoothly. The XML license file contains a few (plaintext) details about the license, along with a binary signature. We'd like to encode (I don't say encrypt) those plaintext details (license duration, user name, etc, etc.) so they're not immediately visible to prying eyes. Is there a standard (eg, base 64 or something else) that people use in this situation? It doesn't need to be secure or particularly clever, just enough to conceal the information in Notepad. Thanks : )

    Read the article

  • Is there an alternative to Google Code Search?

    - by blunders
    Per the Official Google Blog: Code Search, which was designed to help people search for open source code all over the web, will be shut down along with the Code Search API on January 15, 2012. Google Code Search is now gone, and since that makes it much harder to understand the features it presented, here's my attempt to render them via information I gathered from a cache of the page for the Search Options: The "In Search Box" just notes the syntax to type the command directly in the main search box instead of using the advance search interface. Package (In Search Box: "package:linux-2.6") Language (In Search Box: "lang:c++") (OPTIONS: any language, actionscript, ada, applescript, asp, assembly, autoconf, automake, awk, basic, bat, c, c#, c++, caja, cobol, coldfusion, configure, css, d, eiffel, erlang, fortran, go, haskell, inform, java, java, javascript, jsp, lex, limbo, lisp, lolcode, lua, m4, makefile, maple, mathematica, matlab, messagecatalog, modula2, modula3, objectivec, ocaml, pascal, perl, php, pod, prolog, proto, python, python, r, rebol, ruby, sas, scheme, scilab, sgml, shell, smalltalk, sml, sql, svg, tcl, tex, texinfo, troff, verilog, vhdl, vim, xslt, xul, yacc) File (In Search Box: "file:^.*.java$") Class (In Search Box: "class:HashMap") Function (In Search Box: "function:toString") License (In Search Box: "license:mozilla") (OPTIONS: null/any-license, aladdin/Aladdin-Public-License, artistic/Artistic-License, apache/Apache-License, apple/Apple-Public-Source-License, bsd/BSD-License, cpl/Common-Public-License, epl/Eclipse-Public-License, agpl/GNU-Affero-General-Public-License, gpl/GNU-General-Public-License, lgpl/GNU-Lesser-General-Public-License, disclaimer/Historical-Permission-Notice-and-Disclaimer, ibm/IBM-Public-License, lucent/Lucent-Public-License, mit/MIT-License, mozilla/Mozilla-Public-License, nasa/NASA-Open-Source-Agreement, python/Python-Software-Foundation-License, qpl/Q-Public-License, sleepycat/Sleepycat-License, zope/Zope-Public-License) Case Sensitive (In Search Box: "case:no") (OPTIONS: yes, no) Also of use in understanding the search tool would be the still live FAQs page for Google Code Search. Is there any code search engine that would fully replace Google Code Search's features?

    Read the article

  • Solaris Tech Day mit Engineering 3.12. Frankfurt

    - by Franz Haberhauer
    Am Dienstag, den 3. Dezember 2013 haben wir den Chef des Solaris Engineering Markus Flierl mit einigen seiner Engineers und Joost Pronk vom Produkt Management zu Gast in unserer Geschäftstelle in Dreieich (Frankfurt). Wir nutzen diese Gelegenheit, Ihnen bei einem Solaris Tech Day direkt von der Quelle tiefe Einblicke in Solaris-Technologien zu geben: Agenda Time Session Speaker 09:00 Registration and Breakfast 09:45 Oracle Solaris - Strategy, Engineering Insights, Roadmap, and a Glimpse on Solaris in Oracle's IT Markus Flierl 11:15 Coffee 11:35 Oracle Solaris 11.1: The Best Platform for Oracle - The Technologies Behind the Scenes Bart Smaalders 12:35 Lunch 13:25 Solaris Security: Reduce Risk , Deliver Secure Services, and Monitor Compliance Darren Moffat 14:10 Solaris 11 Provisioning and SMF - Insights from the Lead Engineers Bart Smaalders & Liane Praza 14:55 Solaris Data Management - ZFS, NFS, dNFS, ASM, and OISP Integration with the Oracle DB Darren Moffat 15:25 Coffee 15:45 Solaris 10 Patches and Solaris SRUs - News and Best Practices Gerry Haskins 16:30 Cloud Formation: Implementing IaaS in Practice with Oracle Solaris Joost Pronk 17:00 Q&A panel - All presenters and Solaris engineers Bitte registrieren Sie sich hier, um sich einen Platz bei dieser außergewöhnlichen Veranstaltung zu sichern. Es lohnt sich übrigens auch mal in die Blogs von  Markus Flierl mit einem interessanten Beitrag zu Eindrücken und Ausblicken von der Oracle Open World 2013 oder den von  Darren Moffat zu schauen. Gerry Haskins schreibt als Director Solaris Lifecycle Engineering gleich in zwei Blogs - der Patch Corner mit Schwerpunkt Solaris 10 und dem Solaris 11 Maintenance Lifecycle. Bereits in der kommenden Woche findet in Nürnberg die DOAG 2013 Konferenz und Ausstellung mit einem breiten Spektrum an Vorträgen rund um Solaris statt - insbesondere auch mit vielen Erfahrungsberichten aus der Praxis.

    Read the article

  • Understanding the Microsoft Permissive License

    - by cable729
    I want to use certain parts of the Game State Management Example in a game I'm making, but I'm not sure how to do this legally. It says in the license that I'm supposed to include a copy of the license with it. So if I make a Visual Studio Solution, I just add the license.txt to the solution? Also, if I use a class and change it, do I have to keep the license info at the top or add that I changed it or what?

    Read the article

  • What software license to use for commercial software?

    - by GONeale
    Hey there, Under what license agreement should you release software under if it's closed-source and for commercial use only? Are there multiple license types? (such with open source you have BSD, GNU/GPL etc..) If so, which one do I choose, and are there samples out there to get you started? I have heard the term and seen documents named EULA.txt for an End User License Agreement, but can't seem to find a definitive guide on the net as to how to structure one but do see this included with nearly every commercial app I have installed and don't know if it's as simple just to "change to suit your business". Can anyone shed some more light on this? Thanks guys. For further details - our software is non-redistributable, non-modifiable and the user is charged yearly.

    Read the article

  • Linking to an Apache License 2.0 library and distributing with proprietary application

    - by atnakjp
    Hi all, I've read through "Apache License, Version 2.0" but my interpretation was in slightly different to an answer given in a related question so was hoping for some clarification. Supposing I created an application that linked to a library that was licensed under the license in question, my interpretation for doing what's required is: I don't need to do anything special to the application itself because it's considered neither "Work" nor "Derivative Works". When distributing the library alongside the application, I need to include a copy of the license. Any installer that contains the library would be considered "Derivative Works" and therefore I would need to show the attribution notices contained in "NOTICE" (if one exists) in one of its screens. If I were to distribute everything in a zip file instead, I would need to put the same attribution notices in a text file that I distribute alongside the file. Does this sound about right? Cheers,

    Read the article

  • How to list all my packages from command line which can show package name, license, source url, etc?

    - by YumYumYum
    How to get all the installed package list with there license, source url? Such as following only shows name of the package only. $ dpkg --get-selections acpi-support install acpid install adduser install adium-theme-ubuntu install aisleriot install alacarte install For example in Fedora/CentOS (RED HAT LINUX BRANCH), you can see that: $ yum info busybox Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Available Packages Name : busybox Arch : i686 Epoch : 1 Version : 1.18.2 Release : 5.fc15 Size : 615 k Repo : updates Summary : Statically linked binary providing simplified versions of system commands URL : http://www.busybox.net License : GPLv2 Description : Busybox is a single binary which includes versions of a large number : of system commands, including a shell. This package can be very : useful for recovering from certain types of system failures, : particularly those involving broken shared libraries. Follow up: /var/lib/apt/lists$ ls extras.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_main_binary-amd64_Packages extras.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_main_source_Sources extras.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_Release extras.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_Release.gpg lock partial security.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-security_main_binary-amd64_Packages security.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-security_main_source_Sources security.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-security_multiverse_binary-amd64_Packages security.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-security_multiverse_source_Sources security.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-security_Release security.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-security_Release.gpg security.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-security_restricted_binary-amd64_Packages security.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-security_restricted_source_Sources security.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-security_universe_binary-amd64_Packages security.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-security_universe_source_Sources us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_main_binary-amd64_Packages us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_main_source_Sources us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_multiverse_binary-amd64_Packages us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_multiverse_source_Sources us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_Release us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_Release.gpg us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_restricted_binary-amd64_Packages us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_restricted_source_Sources us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_universe_binary-amd64_Packages us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty_universe_source_Sources us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-updates_main_binary-amd64_Packages us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-updates_main_source_Sources us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-updates_multiverse_binary-amd64_Packages us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-updates_multiverse_source_Sources us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-updates_Release us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-updates_Release.gpg us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-updates_restricted_binary-amd64_Packages us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-updates_restricted_source_Sources us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-updates_universe_binary-amd64_Packages us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-updates_universe_source_Sources

    Read the article

  • Virtualbox license

    - by AO
    It doesn't matter whether you just use it for fun or run your multi-million euro business with it. Also, if you install it on your work PC at some large company, this is still personal use. However, if you are an administrator and want to deploy it to the 500 desktops in your company, this would no longer qualify as personal use. (http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Licensing_FAQ) Does that mean it is totally OK to use Virtualbox at my company on a small number of computers?

    Read the article

  • Software license restricting commercial usage like CC BY-NC-SA

    - by Nick
    I want to distribute my software under license like Creative Commons Attribution - Non commercial - Share Alike license, i.e. Redistribution of source code and binaries is freely. Modified version of program have to be distributed under the same license. Attribution to original project should be supplied to. Restrict any kind of commercial usage. However CC does not recommend to use their licenses for software. Is there this kind of software license I could apply? Better if public license, but as far as I know US laws says that only EULA could restrict usage of received copy?

    Read the article

  • Sql-server-2008 client Access license

    - by thushya
    Hi, case 1 : i have one user makes 10 connection from single computer, maximum number of connection at a given time = 10, what is the number CAL i need here ? case 2 : i have 10 users have access to only 1 computer, 10 user connect from single computer - maximum connection at any given time = 1, what is the number CAL i need here ? case 3 : i have 10 users using 10 computers, all 10 are making total of 5 connection maximum in any given time, what is the number of CAL i need here ? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • ql-server-2008 client Access license

    - by thushya
    Hi, case 1 : i have one user makes 10 connection from single computer, maximum number of connection at a given time = 10, what is the number CAL i need here ? case 2 : i have 10 users have access to only 1 computer, 10 user connect from single computer - maximum connection at any given time = 1, what is the number CAL i need here ? case 3 : i have 10 users using 10 computers, all 10 are making total of 5 connection maximum in any given time, what is the number of CAL i need here ? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • ~saas license manager

    - by Steven
    Hi all, We're developing a saas app, which is almost finished. Being in the final stages we're wondering how we are going to charge customers for using our app, how we will enforce they will not pass on their logins and so on. Does anyone know a ready-made solution? We do have a budget for this. rough criteria: - enforcing multiple payment/licensing options (trial - license with grace periods, on demand, pay per use, etc) - integration with payment providers - tracking/preventing unauthorised usage - payment/license plans adjustable on a per customer(group) basis

    Read the article

  • Generate reasonable length license key with asymmetric encryption?

    - by starkos
    I've been looking at this all day. I probably should have walked away from it hours ago; I might be missing something obvious at this point. Short version: Is there a way to generate and boil down an asymmetrically encrypted hash to a reasonable number of unambiguous, human readable characters? Long version: I want to generate license keys for my software. I would like these keys to be of a reasonable length (25-36 characters) and easily read and entered by a human (so avoid ambiguous characters like the number 0 and the capital letter O). Finally--and this seems to be the kicker--I'd really like to use asymmetric encryption to make it more difficult to generate new keys. I've got the general approach: concatenate my information (user name, product version, a salt) into a string and generate a SHA1() hash from that, then encrypt the hash with my private key. On the client, build the SHA1() hash from the same information, then decrypt the license with the public key and see if I've got a match. Since this is a Mac app, I looked at AquaticPrime, but that generates a relatively large license file rather than a string. I can work with that if I must, but as a user I really like the convenience of a license key that I can read and print. I also looked at CocoaFob which does generate a key, but it is so long that I'd want to deliver it as a file anyway. I fooled around with OpenSSL for a while but couldn't come up with anything of a reasonable length. So...am I missing something obvious here? Is there a way to generate and boil down an asymmetrically encrypted hash to a reasonable number of unambiguous, human readable characters? I'm open to buying a solution. But I work on a number of different of platforms, so I'd want something portable. Everything I've looked at so far has been platform specific. Many, many thanks for a solution! PS - Yes, I know it will still be cracked. I'm trying to come up with something reasonable that, as a user, I would still find friendly.

    Read the article

  • what do i have to do when using libraries with BSD license?

    - by androidmaster
    I am making a game using Lwjgl and this is their license. What I don't understand is what must I do? I plan on making a game and distributing it, not the source code just the .jar file and maybe sell it for a few dollars. It said that I must retain the copyright, so would that mean I must include the doc folder that the library comes with in the jar or do I have to make something in-game like credits and say "made with lwjgl"?

    Read the article

  • TotalPhase Aardvark driver's GPL license

    - by Philip
    I'm using an SPI host adapter for a project. The Aardvark from TotalPhase. And I did something crazy, I read that EULA license that everyone just clicks through. The driver installation license includes these bits: This driver installer package also includes a WIN32 driver that is entirely based on the libusb-win32 project (release 0.1.10.1). ... LICENSE: The software in this package is distributed under the following licenses: Driver: GNU General Public License (GPL) Library, Test Files: GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) Now, my understanding of of the GPL is that it's sticky and viral. If you include software then the whole project has to be released under the GPL (if you distribute it, you can do whatever you want with in-house projects). If the driver was like the library, and was licensed under the LGPL, it could be used by my closed source proprietary project, as long as it's source and license was passed along with it. But it's not, it's pure GPL. If I include this driver in my project and distribute it, am I required to release my project under the GPL?

    Read the article

  • Choosing an open source license such that maximum value is added to a startup

    - by echo-flow
    There are many companies that produce open source software products, and many business models that these companies can use. I'm particularly interested in companies like 280 North, the company behind Objective-J and Cappucino frameworks. My understanding of this organization's business model is that they: worked to develop a tool which added significant value to developers, released the tool under an open source license, built a community around the tool (which was helped by the project's open source licensing), created interesting demos illustrating the project's value All of these things added value to the project, and the company that owned it. Finally, 280 North was sold to Motorola. My question has to do with the role of software licensing in this particular business model. 280 North licensed their software projects under the LGPL, which gave them some proprietary control over how the project could be used. I believe that the LGPL is what's known as a "weak copyleft" license, meaning that the project can be linked to, without the linking code also being licensed under the LGPL; but software derived directly from the project would need to be licensed under the LGPL. For web-oriented libraries in particular, weak copyleft, or non-copyleft licensing seems to be quite common; I can't think of a single example of a popular or well-known web-oriented library that is licensed under the GPL (or AGPL). The question then, is, how much value would a weak copyleft license like the LGPL add to a software venture like 280 North, versus a non-copyleft license, such as the BSD license or the Apache Software License? I'd really appreciate any insight anyone can offer into this, but I'd be most interested in answers that can cite other companies as case studies or examples.

    Read the article

  • Can i use Twig and Doctrine in my project which is licensed under GPL license?

    - by aRagnis
    Can i license my open sourced CMS under GPL v2/v3 license if it uses Twig (BSD License) and Doctrine (LGPL)? And i also want to know, that do i have to put this text to teh beginning of all my source files... * This file is part of Foobar. * * Foobar is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * Foobar is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with Foobar. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. ..or can i do it like phpbb does? /** * * @package mcp * @version $Id$ * @copyright (c) 2005 phpBB Group * @license http://opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.php GNU Public License * */

    Read the article

  • Engineered Systems: Oracle schlägt drei Fliegen mit einer Klappe

    - by A&C Redaktion
    Die News aus dem Partnergeschäft von Oracle sorgen für Schlagzeilen im Magazin ChannelPartner. Über den neuen Fokus auf Engineered Systems und die SMB Appliances heißt es dort, so könne Oracle „drei Fliegen mit einer Klappe schlagen“: Erstens wird früheren Sun Hardware-Resellern der Einstieg ins Software-Geschäft erleichtert, zweitens bieten die Appliances neue Möglichkeiten für den Mittelstand und drittens bekräftigt die Strategie das zweistufige Channel-Modell. Dazu Silvia Kaske, Senior Director Channel Sales & Alliances Oracle Deutschland: "Wir stärken weltweit den Channel, weil das SMB-Geschäft zunehmend anzieht." Neben der durchaus positiven Wertung der Channel-Strategie bietet der Artikel einen anschaulichen Überblich darüber, was Engineered Systems eigentlich sind. Außerdem werden die Einsatzmöglichkeiten (Big Data, Mobile Computing, Cloud etc.) und Angebote von Oracle in diesem Bereich dargestellt und diskutiert. Das Highlight hierbei ist – wen wundert’s – die Oracle Database Appliance. Mit dem Portfolio wächst natürlich auch die Zahl der Spezialisierungen. Logisch, findet Silvia Kaske: "Endkunden erwarten keine Generalisten, sondern Spezialisten. Nur mit einem klaren Fokus wird der Partner erfolgreich sein". Hier geht’s zum vollständigen CP-Artikel unter dem Titel „Oracle lockt Channel mit SMB-Appliances“.

    Read the article

  • What is considered to be a "modification" of sources under the BSD license?

    - by Den
    I have a question about the 3-clause BSD license based on it's Wiki description. It states: Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: ... What is understood by "modification"? Specifically I am interested whether any/all of the following is considered as such modification: 1) reading the original sources and then re-implementing; 2) reading the original sources, waiting for a year and then re-implementing something based on whatever you could remember; 3) direct and very significant "complete" refactoring of the original sources.

    Read the article

  • Can you change a license once you pick one?

    - by Adam
    I am working on a product that I don't feel is completely ready but I have a set of users that are very interested in using it now as "alpha" testers. I would like to give them the product now for free as "alpha" testers, but I would like to later license the software. Is this possible? Can anyone point me to any links/books/articles/etc? Thanks. EDIT: Due to the lack of my clarity and the reponses to the question I thought I should add this statement. I haven't decided if I am going to close-source or open-source this project yet. The user base that wants to get their hands on it now has kind of surprised me and I was concerned about what my options are as far as being able to give it to them now as open-source and later change to closed-source, or even vice versa. Thanks to everyone who has answered and commented. I appreciate it the insights.

    Read the article

  • Objective-C runtime reflection (objc_msgSend): does it violate the iPhone Developer License Agreemen

    - by GamingHorror
    Does code like this (potentially) violate the iPhone Developer License Agreement? Class clazz = NSClassFromString(@"WNEntity"); id entity = [clazz entityWithImage:@"Icon.png"]; SEL setPositionSelector = NSSelectorFromString(@"setPosition:"); objc_msgSend(entity, setPositionSelector, CGPointMake(200, 100)); I'm working on code that dynamically allocates classes from XML and calls methods on them via objc_msgSend. It's just very convenient constructing my objects that way but it worries me because i have no idea whether this is ok or violates the License by dynamically executing code or maybe even calling private (?) API functions. They wouldn't be documented if they were private, right? Can someone shed some light on this? Have you had an App approved or rejected using code similar to the above? I'm pretty sure that this is ok but i wan't to hear it from someone else! :)

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >