Search Results

Search found 81 results on 4 pages for 'slicehost'.

Page 4/4 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 

• Sysadmin 101: How can I figure out why my server crashes and monitor performance?

  - by bflora

  I have a Drupal-powered site that seems to have neverending performance problems. It was butt-slow about 5 months ago. I brought in some guys who installed nginx for anonymous visitors, ajaxified a few queries so they wouldn't fire during page load, and helped me find a few bottlenecks in the code. For about a month, the site was significantly faster, though not "fast" by any stretch of the word. Meanwhile, I'm now shelling out $400/month to Slicehost to host a site that gets less than 5,000/uniques a day. Yes, you read that right. Go Drupal. Recently the site started crashing again and is slow again. I can't afford to hire people to come in, study my code from top to bottom, and make changes that may or may not help anymore. And I can't afford to throw more hardware at the problem. So I need to figure out what the problem is myself. Questions: When apache crashes, is it possible to find out what caused it to crash? There has to be a way, right? If so, how can I do this? Is there software I can use that will tell me which process caused my server to die? (e.g. "Apache crashed because someone visited page X." or "Apache crashed because you were importing too many RSS items from feed X.") There's got to be a way to learn this, right? What's a good, noob-friendly way to monitor my current apache performance? My developer friends tell me to "just use Top, dude," but Top shows me a bunch of numbers without any context. I have no clue what qualifies as a bad number or a good number in Top, or which processes are relevant and which aren't. Are there any noob-friendly server monitoring tools out there? Ideally, I could have a page that would give me a color-coded indicator about how apache is performing and then show me a list of processes or pages that are sucking right now. This way, I could know when performance is bad and then what's causing it to be so bad. Why does PHP memory matter? My apparently has a 30MB memory foot print. Will it run faster if I bring that number down? Thanks for any advice. I spent a year or so trying to boost my advertising income so I could hire a contractor to solve my performance woes. I didn't want to have to learn all this sysadmin voodoo. I'm now resigned to the fact that might not have a choice.

  Read the article

• How to setup linux permissions for the WWW folder?

  - by Xeoncross

  Updated Summery The /var/www directory is owned by root:root which means that no one can use it and it's entirely useless. Since we all want a web server that actually works (and no-one should be logging in as "root"), then we need to fix this. Only two entities need access. PHP/Perl/Ruby/Python all need access to the folders and files since they create many of them (i.e. /uploads/). These scripting languages should be running under nginx or apache (or even some other thing like FastCGI for PHP). The developers How do they get access? I know that someone, somewhere has done this before. With however-many billions of websites out there you would think that there would be more information on this topic. I know that 777 is full read/write/execute permission for owner/group/other. So this doesn't seem to be needed as it leaves random users full permissions. What permissions are need to be used on /var/www so that... Source control like git or svn Users in a group like "websites" (or even added to "www-data") Servers like apache or lighthttpd And PHP/Perl/Ruby can all read, create, and run files (and directories) there? If I'm correct, Ruby and PHP scripts are not "executed" directly - but passed to an interpreter. So there is no need for execute permission on files in /var/www...? Therefore, it seems like the correct permission would be chmod -R 1660 which would make all files shareable by these four entities all files non-executable by mistake block everyone else from the directory entirely set the permission mode to "sticky" for all future files Is this correct? Update: I just realized that files and directories might need different permissions - I was talking about files above so i'm not sure what the directory permissions would need to be. Update 2: The folder structure of /var/www changes drastically as one of the four entities above are always adding (and sometimes removing) folders and sub folders many levels deep. They also create and remove files that the other 3 entities might need read/write access to. Therefore, the permissions need to do the four things above for both files and directories. Since non of them should need execute permission (see question about ruby/php above) I would assume that rw-rw-r-- permission would be all that is needed and completely safe since these four entities are run by trusted personal (see #2) and all other users on the system only have read access. Update 3: This is for personal development machines and private company servers. No random "web customers" like a shared host. Update 4: This article by slicehost seems to be the best at explaining what is needed to setup permissions for your www folder. However, I'm not sure what user or group apache/nginx with PHP OR svn/git run as and how to change them. Update 5: I have (I think) finally found a way to get this all to work (answer below). However, I don't know if this is the correct and SECURE way to do this. Therefore I have started a bounty. The person that has the best method of securing and managing the www directory wins.

  Read the article

• Secure method of changing a user's password via Python script/non-interactively

  - by Matthew Rankin

  I've created a Python script using Fabric to configure a freshly built Slicehost Ubuntu slice. In case you're not familiar with Fabric, it uses Paramiko, a Python SSH2 client, to provide remote access "for application deployment or systems administration tasks." One of the first things I have the Fabric script do is to create a new admin user and set their password. Unlike Pexpect, Fabric cannot handle interactive commands on the remote system, so I need to set the user's password non-interactively. At present, I'm using the chpasswd command to change the password. This transmits the password as clear text over SSH to the remote system. Questions Is my current method of setting the password a security concern? Currently, the drawback I see is that Fabric shows the password as clear text on my local system as follows: [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] run: echo "johnsmith:supersecretpassw0rd" | chpasswd. Since I only run the Fabric script from my laptop, I don't think this is a security issue, but I'm interested in others' input. Is there a better method for setting the user's password non-interactively? Another option, would be to use Pexpect from within the Fabric script to set the password. Current Code # Fabric imports and host configuration excluded for brevity root_password = getpass.getpass("Root's password given by SliceManager: ") admin_username = prompt("Enter a username for the admin user to create: ") admin_password = getpass.getpass("Enter a password for the admin user: ") env.user = 'root' env.password = root_password # Create the admin group and add it to the sudoers file admin_group = 'admin' run('addgroup {group}'.format(group=admin_group)) run('echo "%{group} ALL=(ALL) ALL" >> /etc/sudoers'.format( group=admin_group) ) # Create the new admin user (default group=username); add to admin group run('adduser {username} --disabled-password --gecos ""'.format( username=admin_username) ) run('adduser {username} {group}'.format( username=admin_username, group=admin_group) ) # Set the password for the new admin user run('echo "{username}:{password}" | chpasswd'.format( username=admin_username, password=admin_password) ) Local System Terminal I/O $ fab config_rebuilt_slice Root's password given by SliceManager: Enter a username for the admin user to create: johnsmith Enter a password for the admin user: [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] run: addgroup admin [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] out: Adding group `admin' (GID 1000) ... [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] out: Done. [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] run: echo "%admin ALL=(ALL) ALL" >> /etc/sudoers [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] run: adduser johnsmith --disabled-password --gecos "" [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] out: Adding user `johnsmith' ... [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] out: Adding new group `johnsmith' (1001) ... [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] out: Adding new user `johnsmith' (1000) with group `johnsmith' ... [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] out: Creating home directory `/home/johnsmith' ... [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] out: Copying files from `/etc/skel' ... [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] run: adduser johnsmith admin [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] out: Adding user `johnsmith' to group `admin' ... [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] out: Adding user johnsmith to group admin [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] out: Done. [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] run: echo "johnsmith:supersecretpassw0rd" | chpasswd [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] run: passwd --lock root [xxx.xx.xx.xxx] out: passwd: password expiry information changed. Done. Disconnecting from [email protected]... done.

  Read the article

• How to setup linux permissions the WWW folder?

  - by Xeoncross

  Updated Summery The /var/www directory is owned by root:root which means that no one can use it and it's entirely useless. Since we all want a web server that actually works (and no-one should be logging in as "root"), then we need to fix this. Only two entities need access. PHP/Perl/Ruby/Python all need access to the folders and files since they create many of them (i.e. /uploads/). These scripting languages should be running under nginx or apache (or even some other thing like FastCGI for PHP). The developers How do they get access? I know that someone, somewhere has done this before. With however-many billions of websites out there you would think that there would be more information on this topic. I know that 777 is full read/write/execute permission for owner/group/other. So this doesn't seem to be needed as it leaves random users full permissions. What permissions are need to be used on /var/www so that... Source control like git or svn Users in a group like "websites" (or even added to "www-data") Servers like apache or lighthttpd And PHP/Perl/Ruby can all read, create, and run files (and directories) there? If I'm correct, Ruby and PHP scripts are not "executed" directly - but passed to an interpreter. So there is no need for execute permission on files in /var/www...? Therefore, it seems like the correct permission would be chmod -R 1660 which would make all files shareable by these four entities all files non-executable by mistake block everyone else from the directory entirely set the permission mode to "sticky" for all future files Is this correct? Update: I just realized that files and directories might need different permissions - I was talking about files above so i'm not sure what the directory permissions would need to be. Update 2: The folder structure of /var/www changes drastically as one of the four entities above are always adding (and sometimes removing) folders and sub folders many levels deep. They also create and remove files that the other 3 entities might need read/write access to. Therefore, the permissions need to do the four things above for both files and directories. Since non of them should need execute permission (see question about ruby/php above) I would assume that rw-rw-r-- permission would be all that is needed and completely safe since these four entities are run by trusted personal (see #2) and all other users on the system only have read access. Update 3: This is for personal development machines and private company servers. No random "web customers" like a shared host. Update 4: This article by slicehost seems to be the best at explaining what is needed to setup permissions for your www folder. However, I'm not sure what user or group apache/nginx with PHP OR svn/git run as and how to change them. Update 5: I have (I think) finally found a way to get this all to work (answer below). However, I don't know if this is the correct and SECURE way to do this. Therefore I have started a bounty. The person that has the best method of securing and managing the www directory wins.

  Read the article

• Exception Errno::EPIPE in Passenger RequestHandler (Broken pipe)

  - by Millisami

  Hi, Upgraded to Rails 2.3.2 and Passenger 2.2.4 on Ubuntu hardy slice at slicehost with Apache2 I'm getting this same above discussed error in my Apache error.log of system /var/logs/apache2/ [ pid=4249 file=ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp:638 time=2009-07-04 11:47:32.752 ]: No data received from the backend application (process 4383) within 45000 msec. Either the backend application is frozen, or your TimeOut value of 45 seconds is too low. Please check whether your application is frozen, or increase the value of the TimeOut configuration directive. *** Exception Errno::EPIPE in Passenger RequestHandler (Broken pipe) (process 4391): from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/rack/request_handler.rb:93:in `write' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/rack/request_handler.rb:93:in `process_request' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/abstract_request_handler.rb:206:in `main_loop' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/railz/application_spawner.rb:376:in `start_request_handler' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/railz/application_spawner.rb:334:in `handle_spawn_application' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/utils.rb:182:in `safe_fork' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/railz/application_spawner.rb:332:in `handle_spawn_application' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/abstract_server.rb:351:in `__send__' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/abstract_server.rb:351:in `main_loop' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/abstract_server.rb:195:in `start_synchronously' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/abstract_server.rb:162:in `start' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/railz/application_spawner.rb:213:in `start' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/spawn_manager.rb:261:in `spawn_rails_application' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/abstract_server_collection.rb:126:in `lookup_or_add' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/spawn_manager.rb:255:in `spawn_rails_application' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/abstract_server_collection.rb:80:in `synchronize' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/abstract_server_collection.rb:79:in `synchronize' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/spawn_manager.rb:254:in `spawn_rails_application' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/spawn_manager.rb:153:in `spawn_application' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/spawn_manager.rb:286:in `handle_spawn_application' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/abstract_server.rb:351:in `__send__' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/abstract_server.rb:351:in `main_loop' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/lib/ phusion_passenger/abstract_server.rb:195:in `start_synchronously' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.4/bin/passenger-spawn- server:61 *** Exception Errno::EPIPE in Passenger RequestHandler (Broken pipe) (process 4383): and these too. pid=4362 file=ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp:638 time=2009-07-04 11:55:19.251 ]: No data received from the backend application (process 4383) within 45000 msec. Either the backend application is frozen, or your TimeOut value of 45 seconds is too low. Please check whether your application is frozen, or increase the value of the TimeOut configuration directive. [ pid=4298 file=ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp:638 time=2009-07-04 11:55:19.255 ]: No data received from the backend application (process 4252) within 45000 msec. Either the backend application is frozen, or your TimeOut value of 45 seconds is too low. Please check whether your application is frozen, or increase the value of the TimeOut configuration directive. [Sat Jul 04 11:55:19 2009] [error] [client 86.96.226.13] Premature end of script headers: 41, referer: http://domain.com/ [ pid=4373 file=ext/apache2/Hooks.cpp:638 time=2009-07-04 11:55:19.559 ]: Its getting me mad and on the browser, sometimes its show and when refreshed, Application Error 500 shows up in frequent basis. any directions??

  Read the article

• How to reduce RAM consumption when my server is idle

  - by Julien Genestoux

  We use Slicehost, with 512MB instances. We run Ubuntu 9.10 on them. I installed a few packages, and I'm now trying to optimize RAM consumption before running anything on there. A simple ps gives me the list of running processes : # ps faux USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 [kthreadd] root 3 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:15 \_ [migration/0] root 4 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:01 \_ [ksoftirqd/0] root 5 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [watchdog/0] root 6 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:04 \_ [events/0] root 7 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [cpuset] root 8 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [khelper] root 9 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [async/mgr] root 10 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xenwatch] root 11 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xenbus] root 13 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:02 \_ [migration/1] root 14 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [ksoftirqd/1] root 15 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [watchdog/1] root 16 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:07 \_ [events/1] root 17 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:02 \_ [migration/2] root 18 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [ksoftirqd/2] root 19 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [watchdog/2] root 20 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? R< Jan04 0:07 \_ [events/2] root 21 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:04 \_ [migration/3] root 22 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [ksoftirqd/3] root 23 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [watchdog/3] root 24 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [events/3] root 25 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [kintegrityd/0] root 26 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [kintegrityd/1] root 27 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [kintegrityd/2] root 28 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [kintegrityd/3] root 29 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:01 \_ [kblockd/0] root 30 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [kblockd/1] root 31 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [kblockd/2] root 32 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [kblockd/3] root 33 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [kseriod] root 34 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Jan04 0:00 \_ [khungtaskd] root 35 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Jan04 0:05 \_ [pdflush] root 36 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Jan04 0:06 \_ [pdflush] root 37 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 1:02 \_ [kswapd0] root 38 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [aio/0] root 39 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [aio/1] root 40 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [aio/2] root 41 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [aio/3] root 42 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [jfsIO] root 43 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [jfsCommit] root 44 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [jfsCommit] root 45 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [jfsCommit] root 46 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [jfsCommit] root 47 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [jfsSync] root 48 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xfs_mru_cache] root 49 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xfslogd/0] root 50 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xfslogd/1] root 51 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xfslogd/2] root 52 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xfslogd/3] root 53 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xfsdatad/0] root 54 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xfsdatad/1] root 55 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xfsdatad/2] root 56 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xfsdatad/3] root 57 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xfsconvertd/0] root 58 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xfsconvertd/1] root 59 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xfsconvertd/2] root 60 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [xfsconvertd/3] root 61 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [glock_workqueue] root 62 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [glock_workqueue] root 63 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [glock_workqueue] root 64 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [glock_workqueue] root 65 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [delete_workqueu] root 66 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [delete_workqueu] root 67 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [delete_workqueu] root 68 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [delete_workqueu] root 69 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [kslowd] root 70 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [kslowd] root 71 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [crypto/0] root 72 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [crypto/1] root 73 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [crypto/2] root 74 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [crypto/3] root 77 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [net_accel/0] root 78 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [net_accel/1] root 79 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [net_accel/2] root 80 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [net_accel/3] root 81 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [sfc_netfront/0] root 82 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [sfc_netfront/1] root 83 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [sfc_netfront/2] root 84 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [sfc_netfront/3] root 310 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [kstriped] root 315 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ [ksnapd] root 1452 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Jan04 4:31 \_ [kjournald] root 1 0.0 0.1 19292 948 ? Ss Jan04 0:15 /sbin/init root 1545 0.0 0.1 13164 1064 ? S Jan04 0:00 upstart-udev-bridge --daemon root 1547 0.0 0.1 17196 996 ? S<s Jan04 0:00 udevd --daemon root 1728 0.0 0.2 20284 1468 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ udevd --daemon root 1729 0.0 0.1 17192 792 ? S< Jan04 0:00 \_ udevd --daemon root 1881 0.0 0.0 8192 152 ? Ss Jan04 0:00 dd bs=1 if=/proc/kmsg of=/var/run/rsyslog/kmsg syslog 1884 0.0 0.2 185252 1200 ? Sl Jan04 1:00 rsyslogd -c4 103 1894 0.0 0.1 23328 700 ? Ss Jan04 1:08 dbus-daemon --system --fork root 2046 0.0 0.0 136 32 ? Ss Jan04 4:05 runsvdir -P /etc/service log: gems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'??from /mnt/app/superfeedr-firehoser/current/script/component:52?/opt/ruby-enterprise/lib/ruby/si root 2055 0.0 0.0 112 32 ? Ss Jan04 0:00 \_ runsv chef-client root 2060 0.0 0.0 132 40 ? S Jan04 0:02 | \_ svlogd -tt ./main root 2056 0.0 0.0 112 28 ? Ss Jan04 0:20 \_ runsv superfeedr-firehoser_2 root 2059 0.0 0.0 132 40 ? S Jan04 0:29 | \_ svlogd /var/log/superfeedr-firehoser_2 root 2057 0.0 0.0 112 28 ? Ss Jan04 0:20 \_ runsv superfeedr-firehoser_1 root 2062 0.0 0.0 132 44 ? S Jan04 0:26 \_ svlogd /var/log/superfeedr-firehoser_1 root 2058 0.0 0.0 18708 316 ? Ss Jan04 0:01 cron root 2095 0.0 0.1 49072 764 ? Ss Jan04 0:06 /usr/sbin/sshd root 9832 0.0 0.5 78916 3500 ? Ss 00:37 0:00 \_ sshd: root@pts/0 root 9846 0.0 0.3 17900 2036 pts/0 Ss 00:37 0:00 \_ -bash root 10132 0.0 0.1 15020 1064 pts/0 R+ 09:51 0:00 \_ ps faux root 2180 0.0 0.0 5988 140 tty1 Ss+ Jan04 0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty1 root 27610 0.0 1.4 47060 8436 ? S Apr04 2:21 python /usr/sbin/denyhosts --daemon --purge --config=/etc/denyhosts.conf --config=/etc/denyhosts.conf root 22640 0.0 0.7 119244 4164 ? Ssl Apr05 0:05 /usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon root 10113 0.0 0.0 3904 316 ? Ss 09:46 0:00 /usr/sbin/collectdmon -P /var/run/collectdmon.pid -- -C /etc/collectd/collectd.conf root 10114 0.0 0.2 201084 1464 ? Sl 09:46 0:00 \_ collectd -C /etc/collectd/collectd.conf -f As you can see there is nothing serious here. If I sum up the RSS line on all this, I get the following : # ps -aeo rss | awk '{sum+=$1} END {print sum}' 30096 Which makes sense. However, I have a pretty big surprise when I do a free: # free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 591180 343684 247496 0 25432 161256 -/+ buffers/cache: 156996 434184 Swap: 1048568 0 1048568 As you can see 60% of the available memory is already consumed... which leaves me with only 40% to run my own applications if I want to avoid swapping. Quite disapointing! 2 questions arise : Where is all this memory? How to take some of it back for my own apps?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4