Search Results

Search found 17151 results on 687 pages for 'event driven'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 401/687 | < Previous Page | 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408  | Next Page >

  • Getting a borderless window to receive mouseMoved events (Cocoa OSX)

    - by Michael Minerva
    I have a little popup window used for selecting images sorted by groups, and I would like to add a selection box around whatever image is being hovered over. I am trying to this by overriding the mouseMoved event for the window but it seems that a window that has a border-less style mask receives no mouseMoved events even if you have set setAcceptsMouseMoved events to YES. Is there anyway to make a borderless window receive this events?

    Read the article

  • Javascript/jQuery HasLoaded or equivalent?

    - by maxp
    I know in jquery it is possible to call the javascript/jquery onload()/load() functions on, for example an image (<img>). However, if in jquery if i use .html(htmlString) to insert an image after the dom has loaded, how can i add a listener to handle the images onload event? Is there a property I can check to see various images and if they have loaded?

    Read the article

  • .NET and C# Exceptions. What is it reasonable to catch.

    - by djna
    Disclaimer, I'm from a Java background. I don't do much C#. There's a great deal of transfer between the two worlds, but of course there are differences and one is in the way Exceptions tend to be thought about. I recently answered a C# question suggesting that under some circstances it's reasonable to do this: try { some work } catch (Exeption e) { commonExceptionHandler(); } (The reasons why are immaterial). I got a response that I don't quite understand: until .NET 4.0, it's very bad to catch Exception. It means you catch various low-level fatal errors and so disguise bugs. It also means that in the event of some kind of corruption that triggers such an exception, any open finally blocks on the stack will be executed, so even if the callExceptionReporter fuunction tries to log and quit, it may not even get to that point (the finally blocks may throw again, or cause more corruption, or delete something important from the disk or database). May I'm more confused than I realise, but I don't agree with some of that. Please would other folks comment. I understand that there are many low level Exceptions we don't want to swallow. My commonExceptionHandler() function could reasonably rethrow those. This seems consistent with this answer to a related question. Which does say "Depending on your context it can be acceptable to use catch(...), providing the exception is re-thrown." So I conclude using catch (Exception ) is not always evil, silently swallowing certain exceptions is. The phrase "Until .NET 4 it is very bad to Catch Exception" What changes in .NET 4? IS this a reference to AggregateException, which may give us some new things to do with exceptions we catch, but I don't think changes the fundamental "don't swallow" rule. The next phrase really bothers be. Can this be right? It also means that in the event of some kind of corruption that triggers such an exception, any open finally blocks on the stack will be executed (the finally blocks may throw again, or cause more corruption, or delete something important from the disk or database) My understanding is that if some low level code had lowLevelMethod() { try { lowestLevelMethod(); } finally { some really important stuff } } and in my code I call lowLevel(); try { lowLevel() } catch (Exception e) { exception handling and maybe rethrowing } Whether or not I catch Exception this has no effect whatever on the excution of the finally block. By the time we leave lowLevelMethod() the finally has already run. If the finally is going to do any of the bad things, such as corrupt my disk, then it will do so. My catching the Exception made no difference. If It reaches my Exception block I need to do the right thing, but I can't be the cause of dmis-executing finallys

    Read the article

  • Java io ugly try-finally block

    - by Tom Brito
    Is there a not so ugly way of treat the close() exception to close both streams then: InputStream in = new FileInputStream(inputFileName); OutputStream out = new FileOutputStream(outputFileName); try { copy(in, out); } finally { try { in.close(); } catch (Exception e) { try { // event if in.close fails, need to close the out out.close(); } catch (Exception e2) {} throw e; // and throw the 'in' exception } out.close(); }

    Read the article

  • a script translatable to JavaScript with callback-hell automatic avoider :-)

    - by m1uan
    I looking for "translator" for JavaScript like already is CoffeScript, which will be work for example with forEach (inspired by Groovy) myArray.forEach() -> val, idx { // do something with value and idx } translate to JavaScript myArray.forEach(function(val, idx){ // do something with value and idx }); or something more usefull... function event(cb){ foo()-> err, data1; bar(data1)-> err, data2; cb(data2); } the method are encapsulated function event(cb){ foo(function(err,data1){ bar(data1, function(err, data2) { cb(data2); }); }); } I want ask if similar "compiler" to JavaScript like this even better already doesn't exists? What would be super cool... my code in nodejs looks mostly like this :-) function dealer(cb){ async.parallel([ function(pcb){ async.watterfall([function(wcb){ first(function(a){ wcb(a); }); }, function(a, wcb){ thirt(a, function(c){ wcb(c); }); fourth(a, function(d){ // dealing with “a” as well and nobody care my result }); }], function(err, array_with_ac){ pcb(array_with_ac); }); }, function(pcb){ second(function(b){ pcb(b);}); }], function(err, data){ cb(data[0][0]+data[1]+data[0][1]); // dealing with “a” “b” and “c” not with “d” }); } but, look how beautiful and readable the code could be: function dealer(cb){ first() -> a; second() -> b; third(a) -> c; // dealing with “a” fourth(a) -> d; // dealing with “a” as well and nobody care about my result cb(a+b+c); // dealing with “a” “b” and “c” not with “d” } yes this is ideal case when the translator auto-decide, method need to be run as parallel and method need be call after finish another method. I can imagine it's works Please, do you know about something similar? Thank you for any advice;-)

    Read the article

  • jQuery UI Dialog buttons

    - by jAndy
    Hi Folks, when creating a dialog with buttons like: buttons: { 'button text': function(){ // do something }, do I have access to the button within the click event handler? $(this) is the context/jQuery object of the whole dialog. I doubt I have to be such creative as $(this).find('button').attr(...) to disabled a button there ?

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to detect the load of an applet?

    - by zneak
    Hello guys, I'm working on a Safari extension, and I'd like to detect when <applet>s load on a page. However, there seems to be no onload event for these. How should I do it? Transform all <applet> tags to <object> tags and then intercept their onload events? Is there a better way?

    Read the article

  • EAAccessory problem

    - by dragon
    I have developed code using EAAccessory , and its work fine... But when i disconnect EAAccessory, my application got exception like an error....I want to show an alert , while disconnecting EAAccessory.... I am using this line of code in my app (void)accessoryDidDisconnect:(EAAccessory *)accessory; But this event is not fired ..When i disconnect my accessory.... Can anyone help me ? Thanks in advance..........

    Read the article

  • Cocoa equivalent of diskEvt/kEventClassVolume?

    - by tewha
    We have a drop-down menu of volumes in our UI, and I'd like to update it when a new disk is mounted. In the Classic days, this would involve watching for a diskEvt event. In Carbon, I think this was kEventClassVolume. What's the Cocoa equivalent? (A pointer into Apple's documentation on this would satisfy the question. I've been unable to find anything!)

    Read the article

  • How to do jquery code AFTER page loading?

    - by Alex
    If you want an event to work on your page, you should call it inside the $(document).ready() function. Everything inside it will load as soon as the DOM is loaded and before the page contents are loaded. I want to do javascript code only after the page contents are loaded how can I do that?

    Read the article

  • Scanned value(using scanner) in the textbox

    - by Geetha
    Hi All, I am using Scanner(basic model) to scan the barcode. Scanned barcode will be captured in a textbox. In txtBarcode_TextChanged event i am getting the barcode to access. Problem: If i clicked the scanner more than once, the barcode gets append with the previous value. Code: protected void txtBarcode_TextChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { string txt = this.txtBarcode.Text; this.txtBarcode.Text = string.Empty; }

    Read the article

  • Django Date Input Parsing?

    - by Dane Larsen
    I'm trying to get a date for an event from a user. The input is just a simple html text input. My main problem is that I don't know how to parse the date. If I try to pass the raw string, I get a TypeError, as expected. Does Django have any date-parsing modules?

    Read the article

  • jquery binding multiple events, and pass data

    - by mkoryak
    I know we can have this in 1.4: $("a").bind({ click : clickFn, mouseover: mouseFn }); and that is nice and i would like to use it, but it seems like there is no way to pass extra data to events bound this way, it needs to be done the 'old way': $("a").bind("click", {"some":"data"}, clickFn); Question: how can i pass the extra data to my event call backs and bind multiple events in a single bind at the same time?

    Read the article

  • Modify values on-the-fly during SqlAdapter.Fill( )

    - by Timothy
    What would the proper way be to modify values on the fly as they are loaded into a DataTable by SqlAdapter.Fill()? I have globalized my application's log messages. An integer indicating the event type and serialized data relevant to the event is stored in the database as show below. When I display the logged events through a DataGridView control to the user, I interpolate the data to a formatting string. event_type event_timestamp event_details ============================================ 3 2010-05-04 20:49:58 jsmith 1 2010-05-04 20:50:42 jsmith ... I am currently iterating through the DataTable's rows to format the messages. public class LogDataTable : DataTable { public LogDataTable() { Locale = CultureInfo.CurrentCulture; Columns.AddRange(new DataColumn[] { new DataColumn("event_type", typeof(Int32)), new DataColumn("event_timestamp", typeof(DateTime)), new DataColumn("event_details", typeof(String))}); } } ... using (SqlDataAdapter adapter = new SqlDataAdapter(...)) { adapter.SelectCommand.Parameters.AddRange(new Object[] { ... }); adapter.Fill(table); } foreach (DataRow row in table.Rows) { switch ((LogEventType)row["event_type"]) { case LogEventType.Create: row["event_details"] = String.Format(Resources.Strings.LogEventCreateMsg, row["event_details"]; break; case LogEventType.Create: row["event_details"] = String.Format(Resources.Strings.LogEventCreateMsg, row["event_details"]; break; ... The end result as displayed would resemble: Type Date and Time Details ==================================================================== [icon] 2010-05-04 20:49:58 Failed login attempt with username jsmith [icon] 2010-05-04 20:50:42 Successful login with username jsmith ... It seems wasteful to iterate the result set twice-- once as the table is filled by the adapter, and again to perform the replacements. I would really like to do the replacement on-the-fly in my LogDataTable class as it is being populated. I have tried overriding an OnRowChanging method in LogDataTable, which throws an InRowChangingEventException. protected override void OnRowChanging(DataRowChangeEventArgs e) { base.OnRowChanging(e); switch ((LogEventType)row["event_type"]) ... I have tried overriding an OnRowChanged method, which throws a StackOverflowException (I assume changing it re-triggers the method ad infinitum?). I have tried overriding an OnTableNewRow method, which does not throw an exception but appears not to be invoked (I assume only when a user adds a row in the view, which I've prevented). I'd greatly appreciate any assistance anyone can give me.

    Read the article

  • how to trigger notification from other framework in atmosphere (comet)?

    - by Sean Xiong
    basically i have read some samples, but all are self contained in one servlet. such as: use doGet to establish the long polling connection, and then use doPost to trigger the event to notify all suspended connections. Here is my question: I have other web actions programming in spring mvc, in the spring mvc controller a user post a message via /message/post, how can I make this action to trigger the atmosphere handler to notify the suspended connections?

    Read the article

  • Silverlight Two Way Data Binding on Key Up

    - by kouPhax
    Is there a way to fire a two way data bind when the key up event fires in Silverlight. Currently I have to lose focus on the textbox to get the binding to fire. <TextBox x:Name="Filter" KeyUp="Filter_KeyUp" Text="{Binding Path=Filter, Mode=TwoWay }"/>

    Read the article

  • JQuery: calling ajax on drop element

    - by Lukasz Baran
    $("div.square").droppable({ accept: '.white', drop: function (event, ui) { $to = "#" + $(this).attr('id'); alert(to); $.post( "/Game/AddMove", { from: $from, to: $to, GameID: $("#gameID").val() }); } }); Well it's nor working. So I must ask, is it possible to call AJAX on droping some UI element ? The problem is, it's not even calling an controller,

    Read the article

  • How can I prevent row selection in the WPF Toolkit DataGrid?

    - by Kilhoffer
    I see a few options available for row selection, but 'No Selection' is not one of them. I've tried handling the SelectionChanged event by setting SelectedItem to null, but the row still seems selected. If there is no easy support for preventing this, would it be easy to just style the selected row the same as an unselected one? That way it could be selected, but the user has no visual indicator.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET: Bind HyperLinkColumn to more than one field

    - by Jonathan Allen
    Using ASP.NET and the DataGrid, how do I bind a HyperLinkColumn to more than one field? Dim detail As New HyperLinkColumn With detail .Text = "View Details" .HeaderText = "" .NavigateUrl = "\TeamDetail.aspx?Account={0}&Broker={1}" .DataNavigateUrlField = "AccountKey, BrokerNumberKey" End With I was hoping for an data-binding event on HyperLinkColumn but no such luck.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408  | Next Page >