Search Results

Search found 53463 results on 2139 pages for 'net generics'.

Page 402/2139 | < Previous Page | 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409  | Next Page >

  • Linkbutton to open Windows Explorer from Gridview

    - by xt_20
    Hi all, I have a link in a Gridview that I want opened in Windows Explorer (or explorer.exe). <asp:GridView ID="GridView1"runat="server" > <Columns> <asp:TemplateField> <ItemTemplate> <asp:LinkButton ID="DeploymentLocation" runat="server" CommandName="OpenLink" Text='<%# Eval("DeploymentLocation") %>' CommandArgument='<%# Eval("DeploymentLocation") %>' /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> </Columns> and in codebehind I have this: protected void GridView1_RowCommand(object sender, GridViewCommandEventArgs e) { Process.Start("explorer.exe", "/n," + e.CommandArgument.ToString()); } Obviously this doesn't work as Process.Start only works if I have full permissions, etc, etc. I heard that I can use Javascript to do this, but haven't succeeded so far. Basically, what I want is the exact link that is displayed in the grid to be opened when clicked. Any help would be much appreciated! Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Validationattribute only when value is changed?

    - by boris callens
    I want to write a custom ValidationAttribute that checks if the given value is unique or not. The problem is that in the edit screen, it is not guaranteed that the user actually changed the value, resulting in a false error. Is there a way to check in my attribute whether the value actually changed? Or can I trigger the attribute only when the value has changed? I'm getting the feeling this requirement maybe just doesn't belong in an attribute?

    Read the article

  • Handle Enter Key on Website (ASP and VB)

    - by Andrew
    So I have a website with multiple asp controls. When I press enter inside by login form, the search function runs because it's the first thing found on the page. How would I handle the enter button so that when the active textbox is for the login form, the loginbutton code actually runs rather than the searchbutton. One last problem is that the login controls are inside a loginview so the hierarchy shows that the asp:textbox and asp:button for logging in are inside 3 tags like so: <loginview> <login> <logintemplate> //controls are here. </logintemplate> </login> Just a note that all controls are asp and that all code is prefered in VB. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Adding animation to my images with JQuery

    - by slandau
    Here is my home page: <%@ Page Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Views/Home/Home.Master" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage" %> <asp:Content ID="Content2" ContentPlaceHolderID="IndicationContentPlaceHolder" runat="server"> <table id="home" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right:auto;"> <td id="homeLinks"> <div style="padding-left:35px;" id="homeListing" class="containerMid"> <div id="homeView"> <table style="margin-left: auto; margin-right:auto;"> <tr> <tr> <td id="btnIcOld" style="text-align:center;cursor:pointer;"> <img src="<%= VirtualPathUtility.ToAbsolute("~/img/chic/Load.png")%>" /> </td> <td id="btnIc" style="text-align:center;cursor:pointer;"> <img src="<%= VirtualPathUtility.ToAbsolute("~/img/chic/Bar_Chart.png")%>" /> </td> <td id="btnPricing" style="text-align:center;cursor:pointer;"> <img src="<%= VirtualPathUtility.ToAbsolute("~/img/chic/Pie_Chart_disabled.png")%>" /> </td> <td id="btnSheets" style="text-align:center;cursor:pointer;"> <img src="<%= VirtualPathUtility.ToAbsolute("~/img/chic/Line_Chart_disabled.png")%>" /> </td> <td id="btnPort" style="text-align:center;cursor:pointer;"> <img src="<%= VirtualPathUtility.ToAbsolute("~/img/chic/Modify_disabled.png")%>" /> </td> <td id="btnAdmin" style="text-align:center;cursor:pointer;"> <img src="<%= VirtualPathUtility.ToAbsolute("~/img/chic/Profile_disabled.png")%>" /> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="Td1"> <b>Indications Calculator | </b> </td> <td id="lblIc"> <b>Indications Calculator - Beta | </b> </td> <td id="lblPricing"> <b>Managing Pricing Triggers | </b> </td> <td id="lblSheets"> <b>Creating Pricing Sheets | </b> </td> <td id="lblPort"> <b>Portfolio Analysis | </b> </td> <td id="lblAdmin"> <b>Administration</b> </td> </tr> </tr> </table> </div> </div> </td> </table> <div id="pageMessage"></div> <script> $(document).ready(function () { $('#btnIc').live('click', function () { window.location.href = "<%=Url.Action("Indications") %>"; }); $('#btnIcOld').live('click', function () { window.location.href = 'https://extranetint/swap'; }); $('#btnPricing').live('click', function () { //window.location.href = "<%=Url.Action("Triggers") %>"; }); $('#btnSheets').live('click', function () { //window.location.href = "<%=Url.Action("Sheets") %>"; }); $('#btnPort').live('click', function () { //window.location.href = "<%=Url.Action("Analysis") %>"; }); $('#btnAdmin').live('click', function () { //window.location.href = "<%=Url.Action("Admin") %>"; }); }); </script> </asp:Content> How can I, with JQuery (or really anything), achieve a mouse-over effect on my images where they will grow a little bit as you hover over them? I tried using JQuery animate but for some reason I couldn't get it to work. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • InvalidOperationException in Default.aspx.cs

    - by zsharp
    I changed the default namespace of my solution and assembly name, but i still get an error that there is abiguity between these even though the latter namespace is no where to be found. NewName.Controllers.HomeController OldName.Controllers.HomeController

    Read the article

  • Generic <T> how cast ?

    - by Kris-I
    Hi, I have a "Product" base class, some other classes "ProductBookDetail","ProductDVDDetail" inherit from this class. I use a ProductService class to make operation on these classes. But, I have to do some check depending of the type (ISBN for Book, languages for DVD). I'd like to know the best way to cast "productDetail" value, I receive in SaveOrupdate. I tried GetType() and cast with (ProductBookDetail)productDetail but that's not work. Thanks, var productDetail = new ProductDetailBook() { .... }; var service = IoC.Resolve<IProductServiceGeneric<ProductDetailBook>>(); service.SaveOrUpdate(productDetail); var productDetail = new ProductDetailDVD() { .... }; var service = IoC.Resolve<IProductServiceGeneric<ProductDetailDVD>>(); service.SaveOrUpdate(productDetail); public class ProductServiceGeneric<T> : IProductServiceGeneric<T> { private readonly ISession _session; private readonly IProductRepoGeneric<T> _repo; public ProductServiceGeneric() { _session = UnitOfWork.CurrentSession; _repo = IoC.Resolve<IProductRepoGeneric<T>>(); } public void SaveOrUpdate(T productDetail) { using (ITransaction tx = _session.BeginTransaction()) { //here i'd like ot know the type and access properties depending of the class _repo.SaveOrUpdate(productDetail); tx.Commit(); } } }

    Read the article

  • Has Object in VB 2010 received the same optimalization as dynamic in C# 4.0?

    - by Abel
    Some people have argued that the C# 4.0 feature introduced with the dynamic keyword is the same as the "everything is an Object" feature of VB. However, any call on a dynamic variable will be translated into a delegate once and from then on, the delegate will be called. In VB, when using Object, no caching is applied and each call on a non-typed method involves a whole lot of under-the-hood reflection, sometimes totaling a whopping 400-fold performance penalty. Have the dynamic type delegate-optimization and caching also been added to the VB untyped method calls, or is VB's untyped Object still so slow?

    Read the article

  • Semi-generic function

    - by Fredrik Ullner
    I have a bunch of overloaded functions that operate on certain data types such as int, double and strings. Most of these functions perform the same action, where only a specific set of data types are allowed. That means I cannot create a simple generic template function as I lose type safety (and potentially incurring a run-time problem for validation within the function). Is it possible to create a "semi-generic compile time type safe function"? If so, how? If not, is this something that will come up in C++0x? An (non-valid) idea; template <typename T, restrict: int, std::string > void foo(T bar); ... foo((int)0); // OK foo((std::string)"foobar"); // OK foo((double)0.0); // Compile Error Note: I realize I could create a class that has overloaded constructors and assignment operators and pass a variable of that class instead to the function.

    Read the article

  • immplementing security with session variables, how it is insecure

    - by haansi
    Hello, I am doing web based projects in dotnet. Currently I am implementing security using session variables. I keep current user id and user type in session and authenticate user from these session variables (say Session["UserId"],Session["UserName"] and Session["UserType"]) I do authentications. Please guide me how it is insecure ? I heard such security can be broken and applications can be hacked very easily, like it is possible to get session id and directly connect to that session id etc. Please guide me on this thanks

    Read the article

  • casting a generic array in java

    - by liloboy
    The implementation is for a linked list in java : public AnyType[] toArr() { AnyType[] arr = (AnyType[]) new Object[size]; int i = 0; Node<AnyType> current = head.next; while (cur != head){ arr[i] = current.data;// fill the array i++; current = current.next; } return arr; } public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println(ll.toArr().toString()); } The error that I get: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException: [Ljava.lang.Object; cannot be cast to [Ljava.lang.Integer; Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Java: using generic wildcards with subclassing

    - by gibberish
    Say I have a class Foo, a class A and some subclass B of A. Foo accepts A and its sublclasses as the generic type. A and B both require a Foo instance in their constructor. I want A's Foo to be of type A , and B's Foo to be of type B or a superclass of B. So in effect, So I only want this: Foo<X> bar = new Foo<X>; new B(bar); to be possible if X is either A, B, or a both subclass of A and superclass of B. So far this is what I have: class Foo<? extends A>{ //construct } class A(Foo<A> bar){ //construct } class B(Foo<? super B> bar){ super(bar); //construct } The call to super(...) doesn't work, because <A> is stricter than <? super B>. Is it somehow possible to use the constructor (or avoid code duplication by another means) while enforcing these types? Edit: Foo keeps a collection of elements of the generic parameter type, and these elements and Foo have a bidirectional link. It should therefore not be possible to link an A to a Foo.

    Read the article

  • Give a number to return the approximated value of an Enum?

    - by ElektroStudios
    I have this enumeration: Enum Lame_Bitrate kbps_8 = 8 kbps_16 = 16 kbps_24 = 24 kbps_32 = 32 kbps_40 = 40 kbps_48 = 48 kbps_56 = 56 kbps_64 = 64 kbps_80 = 80 kbps_96 = 96 kbps_112 = 112 kbps_128 = 128 kbps_144 = 144 kbps_160 = 160 kbps_192 = 192 kbps_224 = 224 kbps_256 = 256 kbps_320 = 320 End Enum And I would like to return the approximated value of the Enum given a number. For example, if I have the number 190 then I expect to find the more approximated value in the Enum to return the 192 (kbps_192 value of the Enum), if I have the number 196 then again I expect to return the value 192 (not return the next value 224 because is less approximated). Something like this: Private Sub Test() Dim wma_file As String = "C:\windows media audio file.wma" Dim wma_file_Bitrate As Integer = 172 Dim mp3_bitrate_approximated As Integer mp3_bitrate_approximated = Return_Approximated_Value_Of_Enum(wma_file_Bitrate) End Sub private function Return_Approximated_Value_Of_Enum(byval value as integer) as integer return... enum.find(value).approximated... end function Exist any framework method to find the more approximated number given other number in a Enum? I hope you can understand my question, thank you. PS: I prefer a solution using LINQ extensions if can be.

    Read the article

  • showing content from subdomain

    - by coure06
    I have a root site in httpdocs folder. There is another website (for subdomain) at httpdocs/demo1 Mapping is like www.abc.com to httpdocs demo1.abco.com to httpdocs/demo1 How can I show image from demo1 folder? I want to access it like www.abc.com/demo1/images/some.png Error: Parser Error Message: It is an error to use a section registered as allowDefinition='MachineToApplication' beyond application level. This error can be caused by a virtual directory not being configured as an application in IIS.

    Read the article

  • Incorrect component when querying immediately after insert using NHibernate

    - by Am
    I have the following mapping for my table in MySql: <class name="Tag, namespace" table="tags" > <id name="id" type="Int32" unsaved-value="0"> <generator class="native"></generator> </id> <property name="name" type="String" not-null="true"></property> <component name="record_dates" class="DateMetaData, namespace" > <property name="created_at" type="DateTime" not-null="true"></property> <property name="updated_at" type="DateTime" not-null="true"></property> </component> </class> As you see the record_dates property is defined as a component field of type DateMetaDate. Both created_at and updated_at fields in 'tags' table are updated via triggers. Thus I can insert a new record like such: var newTag = new Tag() { name = "some string here" } Int32 id = (Int32)Session.Save(tag); Session.Flush(); ITag t = Session.Get<Tag>(id); ViewData["xxx"] = t.name; // -----> not null ViewData["xxx"] = t.record_dates.created_at; // -----> is null However when querying the same record back immediately after it was inserted the record_dates field ends up null even though in the table those fields have got values. Can any one please point out why the Session.Get ignores getting everything back from the table? is it because it caches the newly created record for which the records_dates is null? If so how can it be told to ignore the cached version?

    Read the article

  • C#: Changing the order of columns when binding DataTable to a GridView

    - by Nir
    How is it possible to change the displayed order of columns from a DataTable? For example, dataTable "dt" contains two columns "a" and "b". I bind it to a GridView like this: gridView.DataSource = dt; gridView.DataBind(); But I'd like the GridView to display "b" first (leftmost). Important point: I'm using this to export to Excel and there's no actual output to screen, using: HtmlTextWriter htw = new HtmlTextWriter(sw); gridView.RenderControl(htw); Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Need ILMerge hint

    - by lakhlaniprashant.blogspot.com
    Hi all, I'm trying to merge vintasoft barcode sdk with my data access dll and it's not working after ilmerge. Any ideas are welcome here is the error: IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the bounds of the array.] 2.+.©(Byte[] param0) in :0 2.+..cctor() in :0 [TypeInitializationException: The type initializer for '2.+' threw an exception.] 2.+.¥S() in :0 Vintasoft.Barcode.WriterSettings..cctor() in :0 [TypeInitializationException: The type initializer for 'Vintasoft.Barcode.WriterSettings' threw an exception.] Vintasoft.Barcode.WriterSettings..ctor() in :0 Vintasoft.Barcode.BarcodeWriter..ctor() in :0 _Default.buttonGenerateBarcode_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e) in E:\ILMergeSample\WebBarcodeWriterDemo\QRBarcode.aspx.vb:27 System.EventHandler.Invoke(Object sender, EventArgs e) +0 System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.OnClick(EventArgs e) +111 System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +110 System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.System.Web.UI.IPostBackEventHandler.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +10 System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(IPostBackEventHandler sourceControl, String eventArgument) +13 System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(NameValueCollection postData) +36 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +1565 Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • NHibernate 3 and MySQL setup tutorial

    - by ryanzec
    Since I have given up on using the entity framework 4 as my ORM (getting it to work with MySQL and mapping table/field names like this_table/this_field to object naming like ThisTable/ThisField is POCO) I am now looking at NHibernate as it seems the the next big well know ORM for C# that probably with not die off any time soon. I am trying to lookup some tutorials and a lot of them in the configuration section have 2-2 in it and was wondering if those configuration would work with NHibernate 3? I am just curious if the 2-2 refers to the version of NHibernate or something different.

    Read the article

  • Sort a GridView Column related to other Table

    - by Tim
    Hello, i have a GridView bound to a DataView. Some columns in the DataView's table are foreignkeys to related tables(f.e. Customer). I want to enable sorting for these columns too, but all i can do is sorting the foreignkey(fiCustomer) and not the CustomerName. I have tried this without success(" Cannot find column ERP_Customer.CustomerName "): <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Customer" SortExpression="ERP_Customer.CustomerName" > A tried also the DataViewManager, but i've a problem to detect the table to sort: Dim viewManager As New DataViewManager(Me.dsERP) viewManager.DataViewSettings(dsERP.ERP_Charge).RowFilter = filter viewManager.DataViewSettings(dsERP.ERP_Charge).Sort = sort 'sort is the GridView's SortExpression Me.GrdCharge.DataSource = viewManager.CreateDataView(dsERP.ERP_Charge) I have to apply the sort on a distinct table of the DataViewManager, but this table would differ on the related tables. I have bound the TemplateColumns in Codebehind in RowDataBound-Event f.e.: Dim LblCustomer As Label = DirectCast(e.Row.FindControl("LblCustomer"), Label) LblCustomer.Text = drCharge.ERP_CustomerRow.CustomerName 'drCharge inherits DataRow What is the recommended way to sort a GridView on columns related to another table?

    Read the article

  • PropertyGrid - is it customizable?

    - by serhio
    I have a project in that we have to represent some graphic objects on a usercontrol in WYSIWYG. Also is required to edit each objects properties(Color, Location, etc). I hesitate between using PropertyGrid ('direct' properties edit) and custom forms on DoubleClick ('indirect' edit). The PropertyGrid is very well but should correspond a some criteria: Only selected properties are Displayed (by e.g. if I have TextRectangle want display only Text and Location); Property names should be customizable and internationalizable (by e.g. TextRectangle Text property should be named "Company Name" or "???????? ???????????"). Now about is it possible I think the answer could be Yes, but is it reasonable to use it if we have not a lot of time. What could be quicker implemented, custom forms or Property panel?

    Read the article

  • How to infer the type of a derived class in base class?

    - by enzi
    I want to create a method that allows me to change arbitrary properties of classes that derive from my base class, the result should look like this: SetPropertyValue("size.height", 50); – where size is a property of my derived class and height is a property of size. I'm almost done with my implementation but there's one final obstacle that I want to solve before moving on, to describe this I will first have to explain my implementation a bit: Properties that can be modified are decorated with an attribute There's a method in my base class that searches for all derived classes and their decorated properties For each property I generate a "property modifier", a class that contains 2 delegates: one to set and one to get the value of the property. Property Modifiers are stored in a dictionary, with the name of the property as key In my base class, there is another dictionary that contains all property-modifier-dictionaries, with the Type of the respective class as key. What the SetPropertyValue method does is this: Get the correct property-modifier-dictionary, using the concrete type of the derived class (<- yet to solve) Get the property modifier of the property to change (e.g. of the property size) Use the get or set delegate to modify the property's value Some example code to clarify further: private static Dictionary<RuntimeTypeHandle, object> EditableTypes; //property-modifier-dictionary protected void SetPropertyValue<T>(EditablePropertyMap<T> map, string property, object value) { var property = map[property]; // get the property modifier property.Set((T)this, value); // use the set delegate (encapsulated in a method) } In the above code, T is the Type of the actual (derived) class. I need this type for the get/set delegates. The problem is how to get the EditablePropertyMap<T> when I don't know what T is. My current (ugly) solution is to pass the map in an overriden virtual method in the derived class: public override void SetPropertyValue(string property, object value) { base.SetPropertyValue((EditablePropertyMap<ExampleType>)EditableTypes[typeof(ExampleType)], property, value); } What this does is: get the correct dictionary containing the property modifiers of this class using the class's type, cast it to the appropiate type and pass it to the SetPropertyValue method. I want to get rid of the SetPropertyValue method in my derived class (since there are a lot of derived classes), but don't know yet how to accomplish that. I cannot just make a virtual GetEditablePropertyMap<T> method because I cannot infer a concrete type for T then. I also cannot acces my dictionary directly with a type and retrieve an EditablePropertyMap<T> from it because I cannot cast to it from object in the base class, since again I do not know T. I found some neat tricks to infere types (e.g. by adding a dummy T parameter), but cannot apply them to my specific problem. I'd highly appreciate any suggestions you may have for me.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409  | Next Page >