Search Results

Search found 21054 results on 843 pages for 'void'.

Page 406/843 | < Previous Page | 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413  | Next Page >

  • How do I write sql data into a textbox after a submit type event

    - by Matt
    Finishing up some homework and Im having trouble with figuring out how to take information generated in sql column(a primary key set up to assign a record number to a customer example 1046) at submit and writing it to my redirected recipt page. I call it recipt.aspx. Any takers Professor says to use a datareader...but things go bad after that. public partial class _Default : System.Web.UI.Page { String cnStr = "EDITED FOR THE PURPOSE OF NOT DISPLAYED SQL SERVERta Source=111.11.111.11; uid=xxxxxxx; password=xxxx; database=xxxxxx; "; String insertStr; SqlDataReader reader; SqlConnection myConnection = new SqlConnection(); protected void submitbutton_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { myConnection.ConnectionString = cnStr; try { //more magic happens as myConnection opens myConnection.Open(); insertStr = "insert into connectAssignment values ('" + TextBox2.Text + "','" + TextBox3.Text + "','" + TextBox4.Text + "','" + TextBox5.Text + "','" + bigtextthing.Text + "','" + DropDownList1.SelectedItem.Value + "')"; //magic happens as Connection string is assigned to connection object and passes in the SQL statment //associate the command to the the myConnection connection object SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(insertStr, myConnection); cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); Session["passmyvalue1"] = TextBox2.Text; Session["passmyvalue2"] = TextBox3.Text; Session["passmyvalue3"] = TextBox4.Text; Session["passmyvalue4"] = TextBox5.Text; Session["passmyvalue5"] = bigtextthing.Text; Session["I NEED SOME HELP RIGHT HERE"] =Textbox6.Text; Response.Redirect("receipt.aspx"); } catch { bigtextthing.Text = "Error submitting" + "Possible casues: Internet is down,server is down, check your settings!"; } finally { myConnection.Close(); TextBox2.Text = ""; TextBox3.Text = ""; TextBox4.Text = ""; TextBox5.Text = ""; bigtextthing.Text = ""; } //reset validators? } The recipt page public partial class _Default : System.Web.UI.Page { protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { if(Session["passmyvalue1"] != null) { TextBox1.Text = (string)Session["passmyvalue1"]; TextBox2.Text = (string)Session["passmyvalue2"]; TextBox3.Text = (string)Session["passmyvalue3"]; TextBox4.Text = (string)Session["passmyvalue4"]; TextBox5.Text = (string)Session["passmyvalue5"]; TextBox6.Text = I don't know ; } } } THanks for the help

    Read the article

  • boost.asio error on read from socket.

    - by niXman
    The following code of the client: typedef boost::array<char, 10> header_packet; header_packet header; boost::system::error_code error; ... /** send header */ boost::asio::write( _socket, boost::asio::buffer(header, header.size()), boost::asio::transfer_all(), error ); /** send body */ boost::asio::write( _socket, boost::asio::buffer(buffer, buffer.length()), boost::asio::transfer_all(), error ); of the server: struct header { boost::uint32_t header_length; boost::uint32_t id; boost::uint32_t body_length; }; static header unpack_header(const header_packet& data) { header hdr; sscanf(data.data(), "%02d%04d%04d", &hdr.header_length, &hdr.id, &hdr.body_length); return hdr; } void connection::start() { boost::asio::async_read( _socket, boost::asio::buffer(_header, _header.size()), boost::bind( &connection::read_header_handler, shared_from_this(), boost::asio::placeholders::error ) ); } /***************************************************************************/ void connection::read_header_handler(const boost::system::error_code& e) { if ( !e ) { std::cout << "readed header: " << _header.c_array() << std::endl; std::cout << constants::unpack_header(_header); boost::asio::async_read( _socket, boost::asio::buffer(_body, constants::unpack_header(_header).body_length), boost::bind( &connection::read_body_handler, shared_from_this(), boost::asio::placeholders::error ) ); } else { /** report error */ std::cout << "read header finished with error: " << e.message() << std::endl; } } /***************************************************************************/ void connection::read_body_handler(const boost::system::error_code& e) { if ( !e ) { std::cout << "readed body: " << _body.c_array() << std::endl; start(); } else { /** report error */ std::cout << "read body finished with error: " << e.message() << std::endl; } } On the server side the method read_header_handler() is called, but the method read_body_handler() is never called. Though the client has written down the data in a socket. The header is readed and decoded successfully. What's the error?

    Read the article

  • segmentation fault for the simplest program??

    - by capex
    Hi, I am just starting out, but this piece of code is giving me a 'segmentation fault' and I can't find out what's wrong with it: #include<stdio.h> int main (void) { int number = 0; int lastDigit = 0; printf("Enter an integer: "); scanf("%d", number); number = number*10; printf("Number times ten is %d.\n", number); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Is this BlockingQueue susceptible to deadlock?

    - by unforgiven3
    I've been using this code as a queue that blocks on Dequeue() until an element is enqueued. I've used this code for a few years now in several projects, all with no issues... until now. I'm seeing a deadlock in some code I'm writing now, and in investigating the problem, my 'eye of suspicion' has settled on this BlockingQueue<T>. I can't prove it, so I figured I'd ask some people smarter than me to review it for potential issues. Can you guys see anything that might cause a deadlock in this code? public class BlockingQueue<T> { private readonly Queue<T> _queue; private readonly ManualResetEvent _event; /// <summary> /// Constructor /// </summary> public BlockingQueue() { _queue = new Queue<T>(); _event = new ManualResetEvent(false); } /// <summary> /// Read-only property to get the size of the queue /// </summary> public int Size { get { int count; lock (_queue) { count = _queue.Count; } return count; } } /// <summary> /// Enqueues element on the queue /// </summary> /// <param name="element">Element to enqueue</param> public void Enqueue(T element) { lock (_queue) { _queue.Enqueue(element); _event.Set(); } } /// <summary> /// Dequeues an element from the queue /// </summary> /// <returns>Dequeued element</returns> public T Dequeue() { T element; while (true) { if (Size == 0) { _event.Reset(); _event.WaitOne(); } lock (_queue) { if (_queue.Count == 0) continue; element = _queue.Dequeue(); break; } } return element; } /// <summary> /// Clears the queue /// </summary> public void Clear() { lock (_queue) { _queue.Clear(); } } }

    Read the article

  • How to unit-test a Wicket component with AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior?

    - by Juha Syrjälä
    I have a Wicket panel that has AbstractAjaxTimeBehavior, that I'd like to unit test. How can I trigger a ajax event during the unit test that end up calling AbstractAjaxTimeBehavior's .onTimer(AjaxRequestTarget target) method? behavior = new AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior(Duration.seconds(pollingPeriodInSeconds)) { protected void onTimer(AjaxRequestTarget target) { // how to unit test this? } } add(behavior);

    Read the article

  • Converting generic type to it's base and vice-versa

    - by Pajci
    Can someone help me with the conversion I am facing in enclosed code ... I commented the lines of code, where I am having problem. Is this even the right way to achieve this ... what I am trying to do, is forward responses of specified type to provided callback. public class MessageBinder { private class Subscriber<T> : IEquatable<Subscriber<T>> where T : Response { ... } private readonly Dictionary<Type, List<Subscriber<Response>>> bindings; public MessageBinder() { this.bindings = new Dictionary<Type, List<Subscriber<Response>>>(); } public void Bind<TResponse>(short shortAddress, Action<ZigbeeAsyncResponse<TResponse>> callback) where TResponse : Response { List<Subscriber<TResponse>> subscribers = this.GetSubscribers<TResponse>(); if (subscribers != null) { subscribers.Add(new Subscriber<TResponse>(shortAddress, callback)); } else { var subscriber = new Subscriber<TResponse>(shortAddress, callback); // ERROR: cannot convert from 'List<Subscriber<TResponse>>' to 'List<Subscriber<Response>>' ... tried LINQ Cast operator - does not work either this.bindings.Add(typeof(TResponse), new List<Subscriber<TResponse>> { subscriber }); } } public void Forward<TResponse>(TResponse response) where TResponse : Response { var subscribers = this.GetSubscribers<TResponse>(); if (subscribers != null) { Subscriber<TResponse> subscriber; Type responseType = typeof (TResponse); if (responseType.IsSubclassOf(typeof (AFResponse))) { // ERROR: Cannot convert type 'TResponse' to 'AFResponse' ... tried cast to object first, works, but is this the right way? var afResponse = (AFResponse)response; subscriber = subscribers.SingleOrDefault(s => s.ShortAddress == afResponse.ShortAddress); } else { subscriber = subscribers.First(); } if (subscriber != null) { subscriber.Forward(response); } } } private List<Subscriber<TResponse>> GetSubscribers<TResponse>() where TResponse : Response { List<Subscriber<Response>> subscribers; this.bindings.TryGetValue(typeof(TResponse), out subscribers); // ERROR: How can I cast List<Subscriber<Response>> to List<Subscriber<TResponse>>? return subscribers; } } Thank you for any help :)

    Read the article

  • Flash: Am i totally misunderstanding Event Listening?

    - by Kohan
    I don't know why but i am having trouble getting my head round event dispatching. Take this for example. someClass():Void{ this.addEventListener("onChange",someObj); } Am i right in assuming this means that someClass is listening for an onChange event and when it gets it, it is then going to fire the onChange method on someObj? Thanks, Kohan.

    Read the article

  • Problems with making a simple UNIX shell

    - by Kodemax
    Hai, I am trying to create a simple shell in UNIX. I read a lot and found that everybody uses the strtok a lot. But i want to do without any special functions. So i wrote the code but i cant seem to get it to work. Can anybody point out what i am doing wrong here? void process(char**); int arg_count; char **splitcommand(char* input) { char temp[81][81] ,*cmdptr[40]; int k,done=0,no=0,arg_count=0; for(int i=0 ; input[i] != '\0' ; i++) { k=0; while(1) { if(input[i] == ' ') { arg_count++; break; } if(input[i] == '\0') { arg_count++; done = 1; break; } temp[arg_count][k++] = input[i++]; } temp[arg_count][k++] = '\0'; if(done == 1) { break; } } for(int i=0 ; i<arg_count ; i++) { cmdptr[i] = temp[i]; cout<<endl; } cout<<endl; } void process(char* cmd[]) { int pid = fork(); if(pid < 0) { cout << "Fork Failed" << endl; exit(-1); } else if( pid == 0) { cout<<endl<<"in pid"; execvp(cmd[0], cmd); } else { wait(NULL); cout << "Job's Done" << endl; } } int main() { cout<<"Welcome to shell !!!!!!!!!!!"<<endl; char input[81]; cin.getline(input,81); splitcommand(input); }

    Read the article

  • Objective-c garbage collection

    - by Chris
    If garbage collection is not required: - (void) awakeFromNib{ //Create the NSStatusBar and set its length statusItem = [[[NSStatusBar systemStatusBar] statusItemWithLength:NSSquareStatusItemLength] retain]; ... Do I have to release that? And if I do, would that be in a finalize method or dealloc method? If garbage collection is required, then is the retain call above ignored automatically?

    Read the article

  • HttpSessionState as parameter

    - by HeavyWave
    What is the highest class in the hierarchy I can use to pass HttpSessionState as a parameter and add values to it? For instance to a method like public void MyMethod(IDictionary<string, object> input) { input.Add("something", something); } I see that implements ICollection and IEnumerable, but that only allows me to read values, not add them.

    Read the article

  • What is the most effective way to create BigInteger instance from int value?

    - by Roman
    I have a method (in 3rd-party library) with BigInteger parameter: public void setValue (BigInteger value) { ... } I don't need 'all its power', I only need to work with integers. So, how can I pass integers to this method? My solution is to get string value from int value and then create BigInteger from string: int i = 123; setValue (new BigInteger ("" + i)); Are there any other (recommended) ways to do that?

    Read the article

  • RadioButton checkedchanged event firing multiple times

    - by kash3
    Hi, I am trying to add multiple radiobutton columns to my gridview dynamically in the code and i want to implement some logic which involves database fetch in the checkedchanged event of radiobuttons but some how the checked changed event is being fired multiple times for each row. Following is the code: aspx: <asp:GridView ID="GridView1" runat="server" AutoGenerateColumns="False" BackColor="White" BorderColor="#CC9966" BorderStyle="None" EnableViewState="true" BorderWidth="1px" CellPadding="4" Font-Names="Verdana"> <FooterStyle BackColor="#FFFFCC" ForeColor="#330099" /> <Columns> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Select One"> <ItemTemplate> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Select Two"> <ItemTemplate> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="lblval" runat="server" Text="!" ForeColor="Red" Visible="false"/> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> </Columns> **code behind** void GridView1_RowDataBound(object sender, GridViewRowEventArgs e) { if (e.Row.DataItem != null) { DataRowView dvRowview = (DataRowView)e.Row.DataItem; int currentRow = GridView1.Rows.Count; RadioButton rdoSelect1 = new RadioButton(); rdoSelect1.GroupName = "Select" + currentRow; rdoSelect1.ID = string.Concat("rdoSelect1", currentRow); rdoSelect1.AutoPostBack = true; rdoSelect1.CheckedChanged += new EventHandler(rdoSelect_CheckedChanged); e.Row.Cells[0].Controls.Add(rdoSelect1); RadioButton rdoSelect2 = new RadioButton(); rdoSelect2.GroupName = "Select" + currentRow; rdoSelect2.ID = string.Concat("rdoSelect2", currentRow); rdoSelect2.AutoPostBack = true; rdoSelect2.CheckedChanged += new EventHandler(rdoSelect_CheckedChanged); e.Row.Cells[1].Controls.Add(rdoSelect2); if (!IsPostBack) { e.Row.Cells[e.Row.Cells.Count - 1].Controls[1].Visible = false; if (e.Row.Cells[0] != null && Convert.ToBoolean(dvRowview["Select1"]) == true) rdoSelect1.Checked = true; else rdoSelect1.Checked = false; if (e.Row.Cells[0] != null && Convert.ToBoolean(dvRowview["Select2"]) == true) rdoSelect2.Checked = true; else rdoSelect2.Checked = false; } } } void rdoSelect_CheckedChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { RadioButton rdoSelectedOption = (RadioButton)sender; GridViewRow selRow = rdoSelectedOption.NamingContainer as GridViewRow; if (rdoSelectedOption.Checked) selRow.Cells[selRow.Cells.Count - 1].Controls[1].Visible = true; else selRow.Cells[selRow.Cells.Count - 1].Controls[1].Visible = false; } i want the checkedchanged event to fire only once for a group name and row.

    Read the article

  • How to remove index from url in asp.net mvc?

    - by Pandiya Chendur
    I am doing a return RedirectToAction("Index", "Clients"); from my home controller.... It is fine but my url looks like http://localhost:1115/Clients/Index... How to remove index from url in asp.net mvc? Any suggestion.... My routes, public static void RegisterRoutes(RouteCollection routes) { routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}"); routes.MapRoute( "Registrations", "{controller}/{action}/{id}", new { controller = "Registration", action = "Create", id = "" } ); }

    Read the article

  • Redirect from Attribute

    - by pistacchio
    How can I create an attribute for an ASP.NET page that redirects to another page? [MyAttribute()] public partial class Default : System.Web.UI.Page { protected override void OnLoad(EventArgs e) { base.OnLoad(e); } } [AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.All)] public class MyAttribute: Attribute { public MyAttribute() { if (// something) { // I need to redirect to some page here } } }

    Read the article

  • modifying MetaData in asp.net Dynamic Data

    - by loviji
    Hello. I want to modify MetaData. For example, let's work with Details.aspx page. There have code: protected void Page_Init(object sender, EventArgs e) { table = DynamicDataRouteHandler.GetRequestMetaTable(Context); FormView1.SetMetaTable(table); DetailsDataSource.EntityTypeName = table.EntityType.AssemblyQualifiedName; } Now, how to force to modify table.

    Read the article

  • Testing custom constraints in Grails App

    - by WaZ
    Hi there, I have the following as my unit test: void testCreateDealer() { mockForConstraintsTests(Dealer) def _dealer= new Dealer( dealerName:"ABC", Email:"[email protected]", HeadOffice:"", isBranch:false) assertFalse _dealer.validate() } But when I run the test I get the following error: No signature of method: static com.myCompany.Dealer.findByDealerNameIlike() is applicable for argument types: (java.lang.String) values: [ABC] I use some custom constraints in my domain class. How Can I test this? static constraints = { dealerName(blank:false, validator: { val, obj -> def similarDealer = Dealer.findByDealerNameIlike(val) return !similarDealer || (obj.id == similarDealer.id) } )

    Read the article

  • Trying to run multiple HTTP requests in parallel, but being limited by Windows (registry)

    - by Nailuj
    I'm developing an application (winforms C# .NET 4.0) where I access a lookup functionality from a 3rd party through a simple HTTP request. I call an url with a parameter, and in return I get a small string with the result of the lookup. Simple enough. The challenge is however, that I have to do lots of these lookups (a couple of thousands), and I would like to limit the time needed. Therefore I would like to run requests in parallel (say 10-20). I use a ThreadPool to do this, and the short version of my code looks like this: public void startAsyncLookup(Action<LookupResult> returnLookupResult) { this.returnLookupResult = returnLookupResult; foreach (string number in numbersToLookup) { ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(lookupNumber, number); } } public void lookupNumber(Object threadContext) { string numberToLookup = (string)threadContext; string url = @"http://some.url.com/?number=" + numberToLookup; WebClient webClient = new WebClient(); Stream responseData = webClient.OpenRead(url); LookupResult lookupResult = parseLookupResult(responseData); returnLookupResult(lookupResult); } I fill up numbersToLookup (a List<String>) from another place, call startAsyncLookup and provide it with a call-back function returnLookupResult to return each result. This works, but I found that I'm not getting the throughput I want. Initially I thought it might be the 3rd party having a poor system on their end, but I excluded this by trying to run the same code from two different machines at the same time. Each of the two took as long as one did alone, so I could rule out that one. A colleague then tipped me that this might be a limitation in Windows. I googled a bit, and found amongst others this post saying that by default Windows limits the number of simultaneous request to the same web server to 4 for HTTP 1.0 and to 2 for HTTP 1.1 (for HTTP 1.1 this is actually according to the specification (RFC2068)). The same post referred to above also provided a way to increase these limits. By adding two registry values to [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings] (MaxConnectionsPerServer and MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server), I could control this myself. So, I tried this (sat both to 20), restarted my computer, and tried to run my program again. Sadly though, it didn't seem to help any. I also kept an eye on the Resource Monitor (see screen shot) while running my batch lookup, and I noticed that my application (the one with the title blacked out) still only was using two TCP connections. So, the question is, why isn't this working? Is the post I linked to using the wrong registry values? Is this perhaps not possible to "hack" in Windows any longer (I'm on Windows 7)? Any ideas would be highly appreciated :) And just in case anyone should wonder, I have also tried with different settings for MaxThreads on ThreadPool (everyting from 10 to 100), and this didn't seem to affect my throughput at all, so the problem shouldn't be there either.

    Read the article

  • Displaying an Image in an activity using URI

    - by evkwan
    Hi, I'm writing an application that uses Intent(MediaStore.ACTION_IMAGE_CAPTURE) to capture and image. On the process of capturing the image, I noted the output of the image's URI. Right after finishing the camera activity, I wish to display the image using this specific URI. The method I used to capture images is: private void saveFullImage() { Intent intent = new Intent(MediaStore.ACTION_IMAGE_CAPTURE); File file = new File(Environment.getExternalStorageDirectory(), "test.jpg"); outputFileUri = Uri.fromFile(file); intent.putExtra(MediaStore.EXTRA_OUTPUT, outputFileUri); startActivityForResult(intent, TAKE_PICTURE); } Which is a method taken from Reto Meier's book Professional Android 2 Application Development. The method works fine, and I assume that the URI of the picture I just took is stored in the outputFileUri variable. Then at this point of the code is where I want to display the picture: @Override protected void onActivityResult(int requestCode, int resultCode, Intent data) { if (requestCode == TAKE_PICTURE) { //I want to display the picture I just took here //using the URI } } I'm not sure how to do it. I tried creating a new layout object and a new ImageView object using the method setImageURI(outputFileUri). My main layout (xml) did not have a ImageView object. But even when I set the contentView to the new layout with the ImageView attached to it, it doesn't display anything. I tried creating a Bitmap object from the URI and set it to the ImageView, but I get an unexpected error and forced exit. I have seen examples from here here which creates a Bitmap from URI, but it's not displaying it? My question is just how to display an image in the middle of a running activity? Do I need to get the File Path (like this) in order to display it? If I make a Bitmap out of the URI, how do I display the Bitmap? I'm just probably missing something simple...so any help would be a greatly appreciated! Also additional question for thought: If I were to take multiple pictures, would you recommend me to use the SimpleCursorAdapter instead? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • can not run java program from command line which resides in package

    - by kshitij
    See following code with resides in fillowing directory mypack.pack1 package mypack.pack1; public class myclass { public static void main(String args[]) { System.out.println("KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK"); } } See following screen shot. that is giving error. And i dont want to add anything in class path because i am in particular directory and it has to work. why it is not working.??????

    Read the article

  • How can I parse through a texutre in DirectX? (IDirect3DTexture9*)

    - by meds
    I've been trying to figure out how to parse textures in directx for two reasons: to write my own texture format and to manipulate data in existing IDirect3DTexture9 type textures. I've been looking at the IDirect3DTexture9::LockRect() function but I'm unsure how it works, are the void* pBits I get out of it in D3DLOCKED_RECT the data in the texture? Does that mean I can read it in by converting it to D3DXCOLOR or something? Really not sure where to go, any help would be appreciated!

    Read the article

  • Windows7 Installer takes priority how to move it back during installation using C#?

    - by shahjapan
    I've a custom Action on Deployment project of .NET Applicaiton, which contains custom dialogbox to enter certain parameters, on invalid parameters I've shown MessageBox.Show - but its being hide by installer window, I tried windows forms too with Activate, TopMost, Focus,bring2front, etc serveral options but it comes by default behind the windows installer window and due to this user is not able to identify why installing process is not finishing - because actually its waiting for user to read the MessageBox and press OK. I've tried to implement IWin32Window with the handler of MsiExec Process, and shown the Messagebox but still its not working, anyone has idea ??? Here is my installer.cs function defination, public override void Install(IDictionary stateSaver)

    Read the article

  • Returning a struct pointer

    - by idealistikz
    Suppose I have the following struct and function returning a pointer: typedef struct { int num; void *nums; int size; } Mystruct; Mystruct *mystruct(int num, int size) { .... } I want to define any Mystruct pointer using the above function. Should I declare a Mystruct variable, define the properties of Mystruct, assign a pointer to it, and return the pointer or define the properties of a mystruct property through a pointer immediately?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413  | Next Page >