Search Results

Search found 3516 results on 141 pages for 'malloc history'.

Page 41/141 | < Previous Page | 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48  | Next Page >

  • a program similar to ls with some modifications

    - by Bond
    Hi, here is a simple puzzle I wanted to discuss. A C program to take directory name as command line argument and print last 3 directories and 3 files in all subdirectories without using api 'system' inside it. suppose directory bond0 contains bond1, di2, bond3, bond4, bond5 and my_file1, my_file2, my_file3, my_file4, my_file5, my_file6 and bond1 contains bond6 my_file7 my_file8 my_file9 my_file10 program should output - bond3, bond4, bond5, my_file4, my_file5, my_file6, bond6, my_file8, my_file9, my_file10 My code for the above problem is here #include<dirent.h> #include<unistd.h> #include<string.h> #include<sys/stat.h> #include<stdlib.h> #include<stdio.h> char *directs[20], *files[20]; int i = 0; int j = 0; int count = 0; void printdir(char *); int count_dirs(char *); int count_files(char *); int main() { char startdir[20]; printf("Scanning user directories\n"); scanf("%s", startdir); printdir(startdir); } void printdir(char *dir) { printf("printdir called %d directory is %s\n", ++count, dir); DIR *dp = opendir(dir); int nDirs, nFiles, nD, nF; nDirs = 0; nFiles = 0; nD = 0; nF = 0; if (dp) { struct dirent *entry = 0; struct stat statBuf; nDirs = count_dirs(dir); nFiles = count_files(dir); printf("The no of subdirectories in %s is %d \n", dir, nDirs); printf("The no of files in %s is %d \n", dir, nFiles); while ((entry = readdir(dp)) != 0) { if (strcmp(entry->d_name, ".") == 0 || strcmp(entry->d_name, "..") == 0) { continue; } char *filepath = malloc(strlen(dir) + strlen(entry->d_name) + 2); if (filepath) { sprintf(filepath, "%s/%s", dir, entry->d_name); if (lstat(filepath, &statBuf) != 0) { } if (S_ISDIR(statBuf.st_mode)) { nD++; if ((nDirs - nD) < 3) { printf("The directory is %s\n",entry->d_name); } } else { nF++; if ((nFiles - nF) < 3) { printf("The files are %s\n", entry->d_name); } //if } //else free(filepath); } //if(filepath) } //while while ((entry = readdir(dp)) != 0) { if (strcmp(entry->d_name, ".") == 0 || strcmp(entry->d_name, "..") == 0) { continue; } printf("In second while loop *entry=%s\n",entry->d_name); char *filepath = malloc(strlen(dir) + strlen(entry->d_name) + 2); if (filepath) { sprintf(filepath, "%s/%s", dir, entry->d_name); if (lstat(filepath, &statBuf) != 0) { } if (S_ISDIR(statBuf.st_mode)) { printdir(entry->d_name); } } //else free(filepath); } //2nd while closedir(dp); } else { fprintf(stderr, "Error, cannot open directory %s\n", dir); } } //printdir int count_dirs(char *dir) { DIR *dp = opendir(dir); int nD; nD = 0; if (dp) { struct dirent *entry = 0; struct stat statBuf; while ((entry = readdir(dp)) != 0) { if (strcmp(entry->d_name, ".") == 0 || strcmp(entry->d_name, "..") == 0) { continue; } char *filepath = malloc(strlen(dir) + strlen(entry->d_name) + 2); if (filepath) { sprintf(filepath, "%s/%s", dir, entry->d_name); if (lstat(filepath, &statBuf) != 0) { fprintf(stderr, "File Not found? %s\n", filepath); } if (S_ISDIR(statBuf.st_mode)) { nD++; } else { continue; } free(filepath); } } closedir(dp); } else { fprintf(stderr, "Error, cannot open directory %s\n", dir); } return nD; } int count_files(char *dir) { DIR *dp = opendir(dir); int nF; nF = 0; if (dp) { struct dirent *entry = 0; struct stat statBuf; while ((entry = readdir(dp)) != 0) { if (strcmp(entry->d_name, ".") == 0 || strcmp(entry->d_name, "..") == 0) { continue; } char *filepath = malloc(strlen(dir) + strlen(entry->d_name) + 2); if (filepath) { sprintf(filepath, "%s/%s", dir, entry->d_name); if (lstat(filepath, &statBuf) != 0) { fprintf(stderr, "File Not found? %s\n", filepath); } if (S_ISDIR(statBuf.st_mode)) { continue; } else { nF++; } free(filepath); } } closedir(dp); } else { fprintf(stderr, "Error, cannot open file %s\n", dir); } return nF; } The above code I wrote is a bit not functioning correctly can some one help me to understand the error which is coming.So that I improve it further.There seems to be some small glitch which is not clear to me right now.

    Read the article

  • Using objects with STL vector - minimal set of methods

    - by osgx
    Hello What is "minimal framework" (necessary methods) of object, which I will use with STL <vector>? For my assumptions: #include <vector> #include <cstring> using namespace std; class Doit { private: char *a; public: Doit(){a=(char*)malloc(10);} ~Doit(){free(a);} }; int main(){ vector<Doit> v(10); } gives *** glibc detected *** ./a.out: double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x0804b008 *** Aborted and in valgrind: malloc/free: 2 allocs, 12 frees, 50 bytes allocated.

    Read the article

  • EXC_BAD_ACCESS at UITableView on IOS

    - by Suprie
    Hi all, When scrolling through table, my application crash and console said it was EXC_BAD_ACCESS. I've look everywhere, and people suggest me to use NSZombieEnabled on my executables environment variables. I've set NSZombieEnabled, NSDebugEnabled, MallocStackLogging and MallocStackLoggingNoCompact to YES on my executables. But apparently i still can't figure out which part of my program that cause EXC_BAD_ACCESS. This is what my console said [Session started at 2010-12-21 21:11:21 +0700.] GNU gdb 6.3.50-20050815 (Apple version gdb-1510) (Wed Sep 22 02:45:02 UTC 2010) Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-apple-darwin".sharedlibrary apply-load-rules all Attaching to process 9335. TwitterSearch(9335) malloc: recording malloc stacks to disk using standard recorder TwitterSearch(9335) malloc: process 9300 no longer exists, stack logs deleted from /tmp/stack-logs.9300.TwitterSearch.suirlR.index TwitterSearch(9335) malloc: stack logs being written into /tmp/stack- logs.9335.TwitterSearch.tQJAXk.index 2010-12-21 21:11:25.446 TwitterSearch[9335:207] View Did Load Program received signal: “EXC_BAD_ACCESS”. And this is when i tried to type backtrace on gdb : Program received signal: “EXC_BAD_ACCESS”. (gdb) backtrace #0 0x00f20a67 in objc_msgSend () #1 0x0565cd80 in ?? () #2 0x0033b7fa in -[UITableView(UITableViewInternal) _createPreparedCellForGlobalRow:withIndexPath:] () #3 0x0033177f in -[UITableView(UITableViewInternal) _createPreparedCellForGlobalRow:] () #4 0x00346450 in -[UITableView(_UITableViewPrivate) _updateVisibleCellsNow:] () #5 0x0033e538 in -[UITableView layoutSubviews] () #6 0x01ffc451 in -[CALayer layoutSublayers] () #7 0x01ffc17c in CALayerLayoutIfNeeded () #8 0x01ff537c in CA::Context::commit_transaction () #9 0x01ff50d0 in CA::Transaction::commit () #10 0x020257d5 in CA::Transaction::observer_callback () #11 0x00d9ffbb in __CFRUNLOOP_IS_CALLING_OUT_TO_AN_OBSERVER_CALLBACK_FUNCTION__ () #12 0x00d350e7 in __CFRunLoopDoObservers () #13 0x00cfdbd7 in __CFRunLoopRun () #14 0x00cfd240 in CFRunLoopRunSpecific () #15 0x00cfd161 in CFRunLoopRunInMode () #16 0x01a73268 in GSEventRunModal () #17 0x01a7332d in GSEventRun () #18 0x002d642e in UIApplicationMain () #19 0x00001d4e in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfffee34) at /Users/suprie/Documents/Projects/Self/cocoa/TwitterSearch/main.m:14 I really appreciate for any clue to help me debug my application. EDIT this is the Header file of table #import <UIKit/UIKit.h> @interface TwitterTableViewController : UITableViewController { NSMutableArray *twitters; } @property(nonatomic,retain) NSMutableArray *twitters; @end and the implementation file #import "TwitterTableViewController.h" @implementation TwitterTableViewController @synthesize twitters; #pragma mark - #pragma mark Table view data source - (NSInteger)numberOfSectionsInTableView:(UITableView *)tableView { // Return the number of sections. return 1; } - (NSInteger)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView numberOfRowsInSection:(NSInteger)section { // Return the number of rows in the section. return [twitters count]; } - (CGFloat)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView heightForRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath { return 90.0f; } - (UITableViewCell *)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView cellForRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath { const NSInteger TAG_IMAGE_VIEW = 1001; const NSInteger TAG_TWEET_VIEW = 1002; const NSInteger TAG_FROM_VIEW = 1003; static NSString *CellIdentifier = @"Cell"; UIImageView *imageView; UILabel *tweet; UILabel *from; UITableViewCell *cell = [tableView dequeueReusableCellWithIdentifier:CellIdentifier]; if (cell == nil) { cell = [[[UITableViewCell alloc] initWithStyle:UITableViewCellStyleDefault reuseIdentifier:CellIdentifier] autorelease]; // Image imageView = [[[[UIImageView alloc] initWithFrame:CGRectMake(5.0f, 5.0f, 60.0f, 60.0f)] autorelease] retain]; [cell.contentView addSubview:imageView]; imageView.tag = TAG_IMAGE_VIEW; // Tweet tweet = [[[UILabel alloc] initWithFrame:CGRectMake(105.0f, 5.0f, 200.0f, 50.0f)] autorelease]; [cell.contentView addSubview:tweet]; tweet.tag = TAG_TWEET_VIEW; tweet.numberOfLines = 2; tweet.font = [UIFont fontWithName:@"Helvetica" size:12]; tweet.textColor = [UIColor blackColor]; tweet.backgroundColor = [UIColor clearColor]; // From from = [[[UILabel alloc] initWithFrame:CGRectMake(105.0f, 55.0, 200.0f, 35.0f)] autorelease]; [cell.contentView addSubview:from]; from.tag = TAG_FROM_VIEW; from.numberOfLines = 1; from.font = [UIFont fontWithName:@"Helvetica" size:10]; from.textColor = [UIColor blackColor]; from.backgroundColor = [UIColor clearColor]; } // Configure the cell... NSMutableDictionary *twitter = [twitters objectAtIndex:(NSInteger) indexPath.row]; // cell.text = [twitter objectForKey:@"text"]; tweet.text = (NSString *) [twitter objectForKey:@"text"]; tweet.hidden = NO; from.text = (NSString *) [twitter objectForKey:@"from_user"]; from.hidden = NO; NSString *avatar_url = (NSString *)[twitter objectForKey:@"profile_image_url"]; NSData * imageData = [[NSData alloc] initWithContentsOfURL: [NSURL URLWithString: avatar_url]]; imageView.image = [UIImage imageWithData: imageData]; imageView.hidden = NO; return cell; } #pragma mark - #pragma mark Table view delegate - (void)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView didSelectRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath { NSMutableDictionary *twitter = [twitters objectAtIndex:(NSInteger)indexPath.row]; NSLog(@"Twit ini kepilih :%@", [twitter objectForKey:@"text"]); } #pragma mark - #pragma mark Memory management - (void)didReceiveMemoryWarning { // Releases the view if it doesn't have a superview. [super didReceiveMemoryWarning]; } - (void)viewDidUnload { } - (void)dealloc { [super dealloc]; } @end

    Read the article

  • Array subscript is not an integer

    - by Dimitri
    Hello folks, following this previous question Malloc Memory Corruption in C, now i have another problem. I have the same code. Now I am trying to multiply the values contained in the arrays A * vc and store in res. Then A is set to zero and i do a second multiplication with res and vc and i store the values in A. (A and Q are square matrices and mc and vc are N lines two columns matrices or arrays). Here is my code : int jacobi_gpu(double A[], double Q[], double tol, long int dim){ int nrot, p, q, k, tid; double c, s; double *mc, *vc, *res; int i,kc; double vc1, vc2; mc = (double *)malloc(2 * dim * sizeof(double)); vc = (double *)malloc(2 * dim * sizeof(double)); vc = (double *)malloc(dim * dim * sizeof(double)); if( mc == NULL || vc == NULL){ fprintf(stderr, "pb allocation matricre\n"); exit(1); } nrot = 0; for(k = 0; k < dim - 1; k++){ eye(mc, dim); eye(vc, dim); for(tid = 0; tid < floor(dim /2); tid++){ p = (tid + k)%(dim - 1); if(tid != 0) q = (dim - tid + k - 1)%(dim - 1); else q = dim - 1; printf("p = %d | q = %d\n", p, q); if(fabs(A[p + q*dim]) > tol){ nrot++; symschur2(A, dim, p, q, &c, &s); mc[2*tid] = p; vc[2 * tid] = c; mc[2*tid + 1] = q; vc[2*tid + 1] = -s; mc[2*tid + 2*(dim - 2*tid) - 2] = p; vc[2*tid + 2*(dim - 2*tid) - 2 ] = s; mc[2*tid + 2*(dim - 2*tid) - 1] = q; vc[2 * tid + 2*(dim - 2*tid) - 1 ] = c; } } for( i = 0; i< dim; i++){ for(kc=0; kc < dim; kc++){ if( kc < floor(dim/2)) { vc1 = vc[2*kc + i*dim]; vc2 = vc[2*kc + 2*(dim - 2*kc) - 2]; }else { vc1 = vc[2*kc+1 + i*dim]; vc2 = vc[2*kc - 2*(dim - 2*kc) - 1]; } res[kc + i*dim] = A[mc[2*kc] + i*dim]*vc1 + A[mc[2*kc + 1] + i*dim]*vc2; } } zero(A, dim); for( i = 0; i< dim; i++){ for(kc=0; kc < dim; k++){ if( k < floor(dim/2)){ vc1 = vc[2*kc + i*dim]; vc2 = vc[2*kc + 2*(dim - 2*kc) - 2]; }else { vc1 = vc[2*kc+1 + i*dim]; vc2 = vc[2*kc - 2*(dim - 2*kc) - 1]; } A[kc + i*dim] = res[mc[2*kc] + i*dim]*vc1 + res[mc[2*kc + 1] + i*dim]*vc2; } } affiche(mc,dim,2,"Matrice creuse"); affiche(vc,dim,2,"Valeur creuse"); } free(mc); free(vc); free(res); return nrot; } When i try to compile, i have this error : jacobi_gpu.c: In function ‘jacobi_gpu’: jacobi_gpu.c:103: error: array subscript is not an integer jacobi_gpu.c:103: error: array subscript is not an integer jacobi_gpu.c:118: error: array subscript is not an integer jacobi_gpu.c:118: error: array subscript is not an integer make: *** [jacobi_gpu.o] Erreur 1 The corresponding lines are where I store the results in res and A : res[kc + i*dim] = A[mc[2*kc] + i*dim]*vc1 + A[mc[2*kc + 1] + i*dim]*vc2; and A[kc + i*dim] = res[mc[2*kc] + i*dim]*vc1 + res[mc[2*kc + 1] + i*dim]*vc2; Can someone explain me what is this error and how can i correct it? Thanks for your help. ;)

    Read the article

  • I'd like to know why a function executes fine when called from x but not when called from y

    - by Roland
    When called from archive(), readcont(char *filename) executes fine! Called from runoptions() though, it fails to list the files "archived"! why is this? The program must run in terminal. Use -h as a parameter to view the usage. This program is written to "archive" text files into ".rldzip" files. readcont( char *x) should show the files archived in file (*x) a) Successful call Use the program to archive 3 text files: rldzip.exe a.txt b.txt c.txt FILEXY -a archive() will call readcont and it will work showing the files archived after the binary FILEXY will be created. b) Unsuccessful call After the file is created, use: rldzip.exe FILEXY.rldzip -v You can see that the function crashes! I'd like to know why is this happening! /* Sa se scrie un program care: a) arhiveaza fisiere b) dezarhiveaza fisierele athivate */ #include<stdio.h> #include<stdlib.h> #include<conio.h> #include<string.h> struct content{ char *text; char *flname; }*arc; FILE *f; void readcont(char *x){ FILE *p; if((p = fopen(x, "rb")) == NULL){ perror("Critical error: "); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } content aux; int i; fread(&i, sizeof(int), 1, p); printf("\nFiles in %s \n\n", x); while(i-- >1 && fread(&aux, sizeof(struct content), 1, p) != 0) printf("%s \n", aux.flname); fclose(p); printf("\n\n"); } void archive(int argc, char **argv){ int i; char inttext[5000], textline[1000]; //Allocate dynamic memory for the content to be archived! arc = (content*)malloc(argc * sizeof(content)); for(i=1; i< argc; i++) { if((f = fopen(argv[i], "r")) == NULL){ printf("%s: ", argv[i]); perror(""); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } while(!feof(f)){ fgets(textline, 5000, f); strcat(inttext, textline); } arc[i-1].text = (char*)malloc(strlen(inttext) + 1); strcpy(arc[i-1].text, inttext); arc[i-1].flname = (char*)malloc(strlen(argv[i]) + 1); strcpy(arc[i-1].flname, argv[i]); fclose(f); } char *filen; filen=(char*)malloc(strlen(argv[argc])+1+7); strcpy(filen, argv[argc]); strcat(filen, ".rldzip"); f = fopen(filen, "wb"); fwrite(&argc, sizeof(int), 1, f); fwrite(arc, sizeof(content), argc, f); fclose(f); printf("Success! "); for(i=1; i< argc; i++) { (i==argc-1)? printf("and %s ", argv[i]) : printf("%s ", argv[i]); } printf("compressed into %s", filen); readcont(filen); free(filen); } void help(char *v){ printf("\n\n----------------------RLDZIP----------------------\n\nUsage: \n\n Archive n files: \n\n%s $file[1] $file[2] ... $file[n] $output -a\n\nExample:\n%s a.txt b.txt c.txt output -a\n\n\n\nView files:\n\n %s $file.rldzip -v\n\nExample:\n %s fileE.rldzip -v\n\n", v, v, v, v); } void runoptions(int c, char **v){ int i; if(c < 2){ printf("Arguments missing! Use -h for help"); } else{ for(i=0; i<c; i++) if(strcmp(v[i], "-h") == 0){ help(v[0]); exit(2); } for(i=0; i<c; i++) if(strcmp(v[i], "-v") == 0){ if(c != 3){ printf("Arguments misused! Use -h for help"); exit(2); } else { printf("-%s-", v[1]); readcont(v[1]); } } } if(strcmp(v[c-1], "-a") == 0) archive(c-2, v); } main(int argc, char **argv) { runoptions(argc, argv); }

    Read the article

  • Differences between matrix implementation in C

    - by tempy
    I created two 2D arrays (matrix) in C in two different ways. I don't understand the difference between the way they're represented in the memory, and the reason why I can't refer to them in the same way: scanf("%d", &intMatrix1[i][j]); //can't refer as &intMatrix1[(i * lines)+j]) scanf("%d", &intMatrix2[(i * lines)+j]); //can't refer as &intMatrix2[i][j]) What is the difference between the ways these two arrays are implemented and why do I have to refer to them differently? How do I refer to an element in each of the arrays in the same way (?????? in my printMatrix function)? int main() { int **intMatrix1; int *intMatrix2; int i, j, lines, columns; lines = 3; columns = 2; /************************* intMatrix1 ****************************/ intMatrix1 = (int **)malloc(lines * sizeof(int *)); for (i = 0; i < lines; ++i) intMatrix1[i] = (int *)malloc(columns * sizeof(int)); for (i = 0; i < lines; ++i) { for (j = 0; j < columns; ++j) { printf("Type a number for intMatrix1[%d][%d]\t", i, j); scanf("%d", &intMatrix1[i][j]); } } /************************* intMatrix2 ****************************/ intMatrix2 = (int *)malloc(lines * columns * sizeof(int)); for (i = 0; i < lines; ++i) { for (j = 0; j < columns; ++j) { printf("Type a number for intMatrix2[%d][%d]\t", i, j); scanf("%d", &intMatrix2[(i * lines)+j]); } } /************** printing intMatrix1 & intMatrix2 ****************/ printf("intMatrix1:\n\n"); printMatrix(*intMatrix1, lines, columns); printf("intMatrix2:\n\n"); printMatrix(intMatrix2, lines, columns); } /************************* printMatrix ****************************/ void printMatrix(int *ptArray, int h, int w) { int i, j; printf("Printing matrix...\n\n\n"); for (i = 0; i < h; ++i) for (j = 0; j < w; ++j) printf("array[%d][%d] ==============> %d\n, i, j, ??????); }

    Read the article

  • Double indirection and structures passed into a function

    - by ZPS
    I am curious why this code works: typedef struct test_struct { int id; } test_struct; void test_func(test_struct ** my_struct) { test_struct my_test_struct; my_test_struct.id=267; *my_struct = &my_test_struct; } int main () { test_struct * main_struct; test_func(&main_struct); printf("%d\n",main_struct->id); } This works, but pointing to the memory address of a functions local variable is a big no-no, right? But if i used a structure pointer and malloc, that would be the correct way, right? void test_func(test_struct ** my_struct) { test_struct *my_test_struct; my_test_struct = malloc(sizeof(test_struct)); my_test_struct->id=267; *my_struct = my_test_struct; } int main () { test_struct * main_struct; test_func(&main_struct); printf("%d\n",main_struct->id); }

    Read the article

  • On Memory Allocation and C++

    - by Arpan
    And I quote from MSDN http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366533(VS.85).aspx: The malloc function has the disadvantage of being run-time dependent. The new operator has the disadvantage of being compiler dependent and language dependent. Now the questions folks: a) What do we mean that malloc is run-time dependent? What kind of dynamic memory allocation functions can be independent of run-time? This statement sounds real strange. b) new is language dependent? Of course it should be right? Are HeapAlloc, LocalAlloc etc language independent? c) From a pure performance perspective are the MSVC provided routines preferable? Arpan

    Read the article

  • Initializing and accessing a pointer from an array of pointers

    - by idealistikz
    Suppose I have the following: void **Init(int numElems) { //What is the best way to intialize 'ptrElems' to store an array of void *'s? void **ptrElems = malloc(numElems * sizeof(void *)); return ptrElems; } //What is the best way to return a pointer pointing at the index passed as a parameter? void **GetPtr(void **ptrElems, int index) { void **elem = elems + (index * sizeof(void *)); return elem; } First, what is the best way to intialize 'ptrElems' to store an array of pointers? I use malloc because assigning it to an array will not persist after the end of the function. Second, what is the best way to point to the pointer at the specified index? I tried typecasting the first line of the 'GetPtr' function to ensure proper pointer arithmetic, but I receive the warning, 'initialization from incompatible pointer type'. Is it necessary to typecast?

    Read the article

  • please help me to find Bug in my Code (segmentation fault)

    - by Vikramaditya Battina
    i am tring to solve this http://www.spoj.com/problems/LEXISORT/ question it working fine in visual studio compiler and IDEone also but when i running in SPOJ compiler it is getting SEGSIGV error Here my code goes #include<stdio.h> #include<stdlib.h> #include<string.h> char *getString(); void lexisort(char **str,int num); void countsort(char **str,int i,int num); int main() { int num_test; int num_strings; char **str; int i,j; scanf("%d",&num_test); for(i=0;i<num_test;i++) { scanf("%d",&num_strings); str=(char **)malloc(sizeof(char *)*num_strings); for(j=0;j<num_strings;j++) { str[j]=(char *)malloc(sizeof(char)*11); scanf("%s",str[j]); } lexisort(str,num_strings); for(j=0;j<num_strings;j++) { printf("%s\n",str[j]); free(str[j]); } free(str); } return 0; } void lexisort(char **str,int num) { int i; for(i=9;i>=0;i--) { countsort(str,i,num); } } void countsort(char **str,int i,int num) { int buff[52]={0,0},k,x; char **temp=(char **)malloc(sizeof(char *)*num); for(k=0;k<52;k++) { buff[k]=0; } for(k=0;k<num;k++) { if(str[k][i]>='A' && str[k][i]<='Z') { buff[(str[k][i]-'A')]++; } else { buff[26+(str[k][i]-'a')]++; } } for(k=1;k<52;k++) { buff[k]=buff[k]+buff[k-1]; } for(k=num-1;k>=0;k--) { if(str[k][i]>='A' && str[k][i]<='Z') { x=buff[(str[k][i]-'A')]; temp[x-1]=str[k]; buff[(str[k][i]-'A')]--; } else { x=buff[26+(str[k][i]-'a')]; temp[x-1]=str[k]; buff[26+(str[k][i]-'a')]--; } } for(k=0;k<num;k++) { str[k]=temp[k]; } free(temp); }

    Read the article

  • assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast

    - by mrblippy
    hi, i am trying to make a linked list and create some methods. but i am getting the error assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast. #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include "students.h" node_ptr create(void) { node_ptr students = (node_ptr) malloc(sizeof(struct node)); students->ID = 0; students->name = NULL; students->next = NULL; return students; } void insert_in_order(int n, node_ptr list) { node_ptr before = list; node_ptr new_node = (node_ptr) malloc(sizeof(struct node)); new_node->ID = n;//error is here i think while(before->next && (before->next->ID < n)) { before = before->next; } new_node->next = before->next; before->next = new_node; }

    Read the article

  • Storing objects in STL vector - minimal set of methods

    - by osgx
    Hello What is "minimal framework" (necessary methods) of object, which I will store in STL <vector>? For my assumptions: #include <vector> #include <cstring> using namespace std; class Doit { private: char *a; public: Doit(){a=(char*)malloc(10);} ~Doit(){free(a);} }; int main(){ vector<Doit> v(10); } gives *** glibc detected *** ./a.out: double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x0804b008 *** Aborted and in valgrind: malloc/free: 2 allocs, 12 frees, 50 bytes allocated.

    Read the article

  • Allocating memory for a array to char pointer

    - by nunos
    The following piece of code gives a segmentation fault when allocating memory for the last arg. What am I doing wrong? Thanks. int n_args = 0, i = 0; while (line[i] != '\0') { if (isspace(line[i++])) n_args++; } for (i = 0; i < n_args; i++) command = malloc (n_args * sizeof(char*)); char* arg = NULL; arg = strtok(line, " \n"); while (arg != NULL) { arg = strtok(NULL, " \n"); command[i] = malloc ( (strlen(arg)+1) * sizeof(char) ); strcpy(command[i], arg); i++; } Thanks.

    Read the article

  • c: memory allocation (what's going on)

    - by facha
    Hi, everyone Please take a look at this piece of code. I'm allocating one byte for the first variable and another byte for the second one. However, it seems like the compiler allocates more (or I'm missing something). The program outputs both strings, even though their length is more the one byte. void main() { char* some1 = malloc(1); sprintf(some1,"cool"); char* some2 = malloc(1); sprintf(some2,"face"); printf("%s ",some1); printf("%s\n",some2); } Please, could anyone spot some light on what's going on when memory is being allocated.

    Read the article

  • Is it bad practice to declare an array mid-function...

    - by Maximus
    In C, which would be more proper... void MyFunction() { int* array; int size; //do a bunch of stuff size = 10; array = (int*)(sizeof(int)*size); //do more stuff... //no longer need array... free(array); } Or is something like this okay? void MyFunction() { int size; //do a bunch of stuff size = 10; array[size]; //do more stuff... } The malloc uses the heap instead of the stack, so I suppose if you know size is going to be very large you'd want to malloc... but if you're quite certain size will be small enough, would the second method be reasonable?

    Read the article

  • I serialized a C++ object, how to allocate memory for it without knowing what type it is?

    - by Neo_b
    Hello, I have serialized a C++ object and I wish to allocate space for it, although I can't use the "new" operator, because I do not know the object's class. I tried using malloc(sizeof(object)), although trying to typecast the pointer to the type the serialized object is of, the program shut down. Where is the information about the object class stored? class object { public: virtual void somefunc(); int someint; }; class objectchild:public object { } object *o=(object*)malloc(sizeof(objectchild)); cout << int(dynamic_cast<objectchild*>(o)) << endl; This causes a program shutdown. Thank you in advance.

    Read the article

  • How to split and join array in C++?

    - by Richard Knop
    I have a byte array like this: lzo_bytep out; // my byte array size_t uncompressedImageSize = 921600; out = (lzo_bytep) malloc((uncompressedImageSize + uncompressedImageSize / 16 + 64 + 3)); wrkmem = (lzo_voidp) malloc(LZO1X_1_MEM_COMPRESS); // Now the byte array has 802270 bytes r = lzo1x_1_compress(imageData, uncompressedImageSize, out, &out_len, wrkmem); How can I split it into smaller parts under 65,535 bytes (the byte array is one large packet which I want to sent over UDP which has upper limit 65,535 bytes) and then join those small chunks back into a continuous array?

    Read the article

  • I need to create a very large array of bits/boolean values. How would I do this in C/C++?

    - by Eddy
    Is it even possible to create an array of bits with more than 100000000 elements? If it is, how would I go about doing this? I know that for a char array I can do this: char* array; array = (char*)malloc(100000000 * sizeof(char)); If I was to declare the array by char array[100000000] then I would get a segmentation fault, since the maximum number of elements has been exceeded, which is why I use malloc. Is there something similar I can do for an array of bits?

    Read the article

  • Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value - freeing a linked list

    - by user720491
    I want to free a linked list in C. All is working fine, but Valgrind is telling me Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) at 0x401400: mtf_destroy Here's the code: list_elt *head; void mtf_init() { list_elt *current; head = malloc(sizeof(list_elt)); current = head; for (int i = 0; i < LIST_SIZE-1; i++) { current->value = (BYTE) i; current->next = malloc(sizeof(list_elt)); current = current->next; } current->value = LIST_SIZE-1; } void mtf_destroy(list_elt *elt) { if (elt->next != NULL) mtf_destroy(elt->next); free(elt); } How can I solve this? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Issues with dynamically allocating a string array

    - by Jason Block
    Brand new to C. I am trying to dynamically allocate the array frags2 of size numberOfFrags and copy over the contents of the original array to it. I have tried numerous approaches and searching and do not understand what is going wrong here. Sizeof on the new array returns 0 instead of what I thought I malloc'd. Any help would be much appreciated! int main(int argc, const char* argv[]) { char* frags[MAX_FRAG_COUNT]; FILE* fp = fopen(argv[1], "r"); int numberOfFrags = ReadAllFragments(fp, frags, MAX_FRAG_COUNT); fclose(fp); char** frags2 = (char**)malloc(numberOfFrags * sizeof(char*)); for (int i = 0; i < numberOfFrags; i++) { frags2[i] = frags[i]; } qsort(frags2, sizeof(frags2) / sizeof(char *), sizeof(char*), cstring_cmp);

    Read the article

  • calling resize on std vector of pointers crashed

    - by user11869
    The problem can be reproduced using VS 2013 Express. It crashed when internal vector implementation tried to deallocate the original vector. However, the problem can solved by using 'new' instead of 'malloc'. Anyone can shed some light on this? struct UndirectedGraphNode { int label; vector<UndirectedGraphNode *> neighbors; UndirectedGraphNode(int x) : label(x) {}; }; int main(int argc, char** argv) { UndirectedGraphNode* node1 = (UndirectedGraphNode*)malloc(sizeof(UndirectedGraphNode)); node1->label = 0; node1->neighbors.resize(2); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • creating new array according to input

    - by gcc
    int *arrays[20],j,a=0; /*int num_arrays;*/ char *tutar[200]; int /*fe*/i=0,n,temp; do{ tutar[i]=malloc(sizeof(int)); scanf("%s",tutar[i]); temp=*tutar[i]; ++i; } while(temp!='x'); int *arrays[20],j,a=0; n=i; j=1; for(i=1;i if(atoi(tutar[i])=='n') { ++j; arrays[j]=malloc(sizeof(int)); a=0; } arrays[j][a]=*(int *)tutar[i]; if(atoi(tutar[i])=='x') break; } input: 1 2 3 4 n 14 23 39 n 98 100 x output: arrays[1]:2 3 4 arrays[2]:14 23 39 arrays[3]:98 100 //i wanna output like that but my code didnt give me output like that //can anyone fix my code or (explain where is my error)

    Read the article

  • C Allocating Two Dimensional Arrays

    - by Jacob
    I am trying to allocate a 2D dimension array of File Descriptors... So I would need something like this fd[0][0] fd[0][1] I have coded so far: void allocateMemory(int row, int col, int ***myPipes){ int i = 0,i2 = 0; myPipes = (int**)malloc(row * sizeof(int*)); for(i = 0; i < row;i++){ myPipes[i] = (int*)malloc(col * sizeof(int)); } } How can I set it all too zeros right now I keep getting a seg fault when I try to assign a value... Thanks

    Read the article

  • Allocate from buffer in C

    - by Grimless
    I am building a simple particle system and want to use a single array buffer of structs to manage my particles. That said, I can't find a C function that allows me to malloc() and free() from an arbitrary buffer. Here is some pseudocode to show my intent: Particle* particles = (Particle*) malloc( sizeof(Particle) * numParticles ); Particle* firstParticle = <buffer_alloc>( particles ); initialize_particle( firstParticle ); // ... Some more stuff if (firstParticle->life < 0) <buffer_free>( firstParticle ); // @ program's end free(particles); Where <buffer_alloc> and <buffer_free> are functions that allocate and free memory chunks from arbitrary pointers (possibly with additional metadata such as buffer length, etc.). Do such functions exist and/or is there a better way to do this? Thank you!

    Read the article

  • How to define an array inside a function in C?

    - by Arunav Dev
    So in my source file I have the folowin function: void update(state* old_state, state* measurement, uint32_t size) { state new_state[size]; //some function using measurement and old_state and returning the result in newstate arm_fadd_32(measurement,old_state,newstate,size); // rest of the code } Now the compiler throws an error saying that error#28:expression must have a constant value. I think it's due to the fact that even though inside the method the size local variable is not changing the compiler is expecting a constant while defining the size. I have tried the following: int const a = size; and then tried to reinitialize it says constant value is not known. I did some research in internet and it appears that there is no easier way without using malloc, which I don't want to since I am using the code for some embedded application. Is there a way to avoid this problem without really using malloc? Thanks in advance guys!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48  | Next Page >