Search Results

Search found 36013 results on 1441 pages for 'public fields'.

Page 421/1441 | < Previous Page | 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428  | Next Page >

  • .NET XML Serialization, possibly to use a different method name than PropertySpecified for ignoring

    - by Lasse V. Karlsen
    I have a bunch of classes that I intend to serialize in order to transport over a webservice call. These classes already have properties that return whether a given "real" property has a value or not, that is ingrained in a lot of code of our product. Is it possible, for instance through attributes, for me to specify that each "real" property should be included if a specified other property returns true, but not one that is called RealPropertyNameSpecified? ie. for instance if I have this class: [XmlType("test")] public class TestClass { [XmlIgnore] public bool NameHasGotAValue { get; set; } [XmlElement("name")] public string Name { get; set; } } Is it possible for me to use the NameHasGotAValue as the "*Specified" method for the Name property, or is my only option to either rename NameHasGotAValue, add a NameSpecified method, or implement IXmlSerializable?

    Read the article

  • Reflection in unit tests for checking code coverage

    - by Gary
    Here's the scenario. I have VO (Value Objects) or DTO objects that are just containers for data. When I take those and split them apart for saving into a DB that (for lots of reasons) doesn't map to the VO's elegantly, I want to test to see if each field is successfully being created in the database and successfully read back in to rebuild the VO. Is there a way I can test that my tests cover every field in the VO? I had an idea about using reflection to iterate through the fields of the VO's as part of the solution, but maybe you guys have solved the problem before? I want this test to fail when I add fields in the VO, and don't remember to add checks for it in my tests.

    Read the article

  • SQLite SQLite column can't be updated to any value but zero (real type)

    - by user1065320
    Hi I'm trying to create a three fields table (date,text,real), I can insert and update the first two fields but can't set or update the last one. createSQL = @"CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS ACTIVITIES (MYDATE DATETIME PRIMARY KEY, ACTIVITY TEXT , LENGTH REAL);"; try to insert char *update = "INSERT OR REPLACE INTO ACTIVITIES (MYDATE, ACTIVITY , LENGTH) VALUES (?, ? ,?);"; sqlite3_stmt *stmt; if (sqlite3_prepare_v2(database, update , -1, &stmt, nil) == SQLITE_OK) { sqlite3_bind_double(stmt, 1, valueToWrite); sqlite3_bind_text(stmt, 2, [task UTF8String], -1, NULL); sqlite3_bind_double(stmt, 3, 1.5); } if (sqlite3_step(stmt) != SQLITE_DONE) { NSAssert1(0, @"Error updating table: %s", errorMsg); } sqlite3_finalize(stmt); sqlite3_close(database); The first two values are updated but the last one remains 0 even if I'm writing a value like 1.5 or put a double variable with a different value Thanks

    Read the article

  • Gson serialization depending on field value

    - by Serj Lotutovici
    I have a POJO that is similar to: public class MyGsonPojo { @Expose @SerializedName("value1") private String valueOne; @Expose @SerializedName("value2") private boolean valueTwo; @Expose @SerializedName("value3") private int valueThree; // Getters and other stuff here } The issue is that this object has to be serialized into a json body for a call to the server. Some fields are optional for the request and if I even send it with default and null values, the API responds differently (Unfortunately changing the api is not an option). So basically I need to exclude fields from serialization if any of them is set to a default value. For example if the field valueOne is null the resulting json should be: { "value2" : true, "value3" : 2 } Any idea how to make this a painless effort? I wouldn't want to build the json body manually. Any help would be great. Thank you in advice.

    Read the article

  • Is there a a C-like way to get item number from enum in java ?

    - by Hernán Eche
    Perhap this is a simple basic question Having an enum public enum TK{ ID,GROUP,DATA,FAIL; } Can I get the order number for example ID=0, GROUP=2, DATA=3, FAIL=4 ? This is a way to to that, but a weird and long one! =S public enum TK{ ID(0),GROUP(1),DATA(2),FAIL(3); int num; TK(int n) { this.num=n; } public int get() { return num; } }; to get numbers so I write TK.ID.get(), TK.GROUP.get(), etc... I don't like that there is a better way? ( C enums, C macros..I miss you both ) thanks

    Read the article

  • Database design: How should I add an information which can apply to several tables

    - by Stefan
    I am constructing a database System using Mysql, this will be an application of about 20 tables. The system contains information on farmers, we work with organic certification and need to record a lot of info for that. In my system, there are related parent-child tables for farmers, producing years and fields/areas - it's a simple representation of the real world in which farmers farm crops on their fields. I now need to add several status flags for each one of these levels: a farmer can be certified, or his field can be, or the specific year can be; each of these flags has several states and can occur a number of times. The obvious solution to this would be to add a child table to every one of these tables, and define the states there. What I wonder if there is an easier way to do this to avoid getting to many tables? Where/how would be best practise to keep that data?

    Read the article

  • addDoubleClickHandler to a FixedWidthGrid !!

    - by MArio
    Hello so I got a FixedWidthGrid table which is made from a pagingtable FixedWidthGrid dataTable = x.getDataTable(); I could add alot of handlers to the dataTables rows like selected or sort policies. but I cant add a double click handler ... anyway idea's ?! thank you I do have a class which I made to try to add a double click hander but it didn't work. class: public class DoubleClickTable extends FixedWidthGrid implements HasDoubleClickHandlers { public DoubleClickTable() { super(); } public HandlerRegistration addDoubleClickHandler(DoubleClickHandler handler) { return addDomHandler(handler, DoubleClickEvent.getType()); } } Thank you so much for your help.

    Read the article

  • Auto wiring of Property does not work for me

    - by Xabatcha
    Hi All, In my Asp.Net project I wanna use Property Auto-wiring, e.g. for my ILogger. Basically I placed Property into my base classes. One for Page, one for UserControl. Like below. public class UserControlBase : UserControl { public ILogger CLogger { get; set; } .... } However when calling in inherited control, logger is null. I checked the container and it'a definitely set. Below is setting which is called from Global.asax. public static void SetupForIoC() { Debug.WriteLine("SetupForIoC"); ObjectFactory.Initialize(x => { x.FillAllPropertiesOfType<ILogger>().TheDefaultIsConcreteType<EntLibLogger>().AsSingletons(); x.FillAllPropertiesOfType<ISiteService>().TheDefaultIsConcreteType<SiteService>().AsSingletons(); }); Debug.WriteLine(ObjectFactory.WhatDoIHave()); } Thanks for any advice, tip? X.

    Read the article

  • java thread - run() and start() methods

    - by JavaUser
    Please explain the output of the below code: If I call th1.run() ,the output is EXTENDS RUN RUNNABLE RUN If I call th1.start() , the output is : RUNNABLE RUN EXTENDS RUN Why this inconsistency . Please explain. class ThreadExample extends Thread{ public void run(){ System.out.println("EXTENDS RUN"); } } class ThreadExampleRunnable implements Runnable { public void run(){ System.out.println("RUNNABLE RUN "); } } class ThreadExampleMain{ public static void main(String[] args){ ThreadExample th1 = new ThreadExample(); //th1.start(); th1.run(); ThreadExampleRunnable th2 = new ThreadExampleRunnable(); th2.run(); } }

    Read the article

  • How can I retrieve the values of controls in the form that posted?

    - by Mike at KBS
    I know this has got to be the simplest-sounding question ever asked about ASP.Net but I'm baffled. I have a form wherein my visitor will enter name, address, etc. Then I am POSTing that form via the PostBackUrl property of my Submit button to another page, where the fields are supposed to be all re-formed into new hidden fields, then POSTed again to Paypal. My problem is I cannot get at the values entered by the visitor in the original page. Any time I put in "runat='server'", ASP.Net completely changes the ID of the control, making it impossible to figure out how to access. In the POSTed form I tried Request.Form["_txtFirstName"] and that turned up null. Then I tried ((TextBox)PreviousPage.FindControl("_txtFirstName")).Text and that was null, too. I've tried variations on those. I cannot figure out how I'm supposed to get at these controls. Why does this stuff need to be so difficult?

    Read the article

  • convert array of objects to concatenated string

    - by oo
    if i have: List<Car> where car is: public class Car { public int Year; public string Name; } and i want to take this array and create a concatenated string by "," so it would return: "Toyota", "Ford", "Chevy" i can do it manually like this: private static string CreateConcatenatedList(List<Car> parts_) { StringBuilder b = new StringBuilder(); foreach (Car bp in parts_) { b.Append(bp.Name + ", "); } b.Remove(b.Length - 2, 2); return b.ToString(); } but i thought there might be a more elegant way

    Read the article

  • What really is the purpose of "base" keyword in c#?

    - by Pandiya Chendur
    Thus for used base class for some commom reusable methods in every page of my application... public class BaseClass:System.Web.UI.Page { public string GetRandomPasswordUsingGUID(int length) { string guidResult = System.Guid.NewGuid().ToString(); guidResult = guidResult.Replace("-", string.Empty); return guidResult.Substring(0, length); } } So if i want to use this method i would just do, public partial class forms_age_group : BaseClass { protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { //i would just call it like this string pass = GetRandomPasswordUsingGUID(10); } } It does what i want but there is a "Base" keyword that deals with base class in c# ... I really want to know when should use base keyword in my derived class.... Any good example...

    Read the article

  • How to declare a warning on field with AspectJ

    - by Ralph
    I want to declare a warning on all fields Annotated with @org.jboss.weld.context.ejb.Ejb in AspectJ. But I do not find a way how to select that field. I guess the aspect should be something like that: public aspect WrongEjbAnnotationWarningAspect { declare warning : within(com.queomedia..*) && ??? (@org.jboss.weld.context.ejb.Ejb) : "WrongEjbAnnotationErrorAspect: use javax.ejb.EJB instead of weld Ejb!"; } Or is it impossible to declare warnings on fields at all?

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to send an automated email with dynamic content in Rails

    - by Danny McClelland
    Hi Everyone, I am looking into the best way of doing the following: I have a model called Kase, and when a user creates a new case then are taken to the show view as you would expect. I am trying to work out what the best way of sending an automated email between those two events is. I would need to include in the email the content of a couple of the fields, ideally I am looking for a way of just typing out the email and adding the same snippets that are in the show view for each of the fields I need. I am using the Base App from Github so the email sending is already setup for the user authentication and registration, but I'm not sure where to begin. The reason I want to send the email is to create a new Case in our Highrise account, and I don't have a clue how to use the API. So I think the email sending is the easier way. Thanks, Danny

    Read the article

  • Can i access outer class objects in inner class

    - by Shantanu Gupta
    I have three classes like this. class A { public class innerB { //Do something } public class innerC { //trying to access objB here directly or indirectly over here. //I dont have to create an object of innerB, but to access the object created by A //i.e. innerB objInnerB = objB; //not like this innerB objInnerB= new innerB(); } public innerB objB{get;set;} } I want to access the object of class B in Class C that is created by class A. Is it possible somehow to make changes on object of Class A in Class C. Can i get Class A's object by creating event or anyhow.

    Read the article

  • NUnit Assert a list of objects in no order

    - by Shawn Mclean
    How do I Assert a collection of items in no particular order? I just want to make sure all the items are in the list. I'm heard of CollectionAssert but I do not see any method that would do what I want. My object looks like this: public class Vector2{ public float X {get; set;} public float Y {get; set;} } Assert - I want something like this: CollectionAssert.ContainsAll(mesh.GetPolygonVertices(0), aListOfVertices); mesh.GetPolygonVertices(int) returns a List<Vector2> and aListOfVertices contains all of what is returned, but not guaranteed that order.

    Read the article

  • When using Dependency Injection with StructureMap how do I chooose among multiple constructors?

    - by Mark Rogers
    I'm trying to get structuremap to build Fluent Nhibernate's SessionSource object for some of my intregration tests. The only problem is that Fluent's concrete implementation of ISessionSource (SessionSource) has 3 constructors: public SessionSource(PersistenceModel model) { Initialize(new Configuration().Configure(), model); } public SessionSource(IDictionary<string, string> properties, PersistenceModel model) { Initialize(new Configuration().AddProperties(properties), model); } public SessionSource(FluentConfiguration config) { configuration = config.Configuration; sessionFactory = config.BuildSessionFactory(); dialect = Dialect.GetDialect(configuration.Properties); } I've tried configuring my ObjectFactory supplying an argument for the first constructor but it seems like it wants to try the second one. How do I configure my ObjectFactory so that I can choose the first constructor or perhaps even another one if I decide to use that?

    Read the article

  • ASP.Net navigation tabs like windows tab control

    - by devphil
    I would like to have a webpage something like windows tab control. Each webpage does not lose the contents and data while moving between pages, postbacks, etc. Here is the website design and my idea: [Master Page] "Fruits" "Cars" "Animals" "Operators" clicking on "Fruits" will forwards to "Fruits" page, and the same for other links (tabs) The user works on "Fruits" page searching fruits, fill up some fields, etc. The user then moves to "Cars" page and then builds up his own car by filling some fields, etc and then the user goes back to "Fruits" page again - the user sees the same page where she/he left on "Fruits" page. Please suggest some good ways other than using javascript:history.go(-1). Is this possible to implement?

    Read the article

  • Zend - Deny access to CSS, JS, Image files

    - by Vincent
    All, I have the following Zend application structure: helloworld - application - configs - controllers - models - layouts - include - library - public - design -- css -- site.css -- js -- global.js -- images -- siteheader.gif -- sitefooter.gif - .htaccess - index.php My .htaccess file in public folder looks like this: Options -MultiViews RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -s [OR] RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -l [OR] RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -d RewriteRule ^.*$ - [NC,L] RewriteRule ^.*$ index.php [NC,L] My document root points to the "public" folder. Currently, if the user visits a directory level URL, (Ex: http://localhost/design or localhost/css) , my .htaccess file above make sure to show him the "Access Forbidden" page. But if he visits the file level URL, (Ex: http://localhost/design/css/site.css), it shows him the CSS file or the js file or PHP file.. How can I make sure to lock file level access for the above file types, if accessed directly from the URL? Since my application is JS intensive, I want to protect it from users looking at it. Thanks

    Read the article

  • AngularJS recursive directive with a dynamic HTML template (bounty)

    - by Nazar Sobchuk
    I have a realy hard task here. I am working on an AngularJS web app, which is capable of sending different HTTP methods to our project's Restful Web Service and receiving responses in JSON. Basicaly it looks like this: You can create some REST resource from this application. Let's say an exam. To create an exam - you pick a resource from a list of available resources. This triggers a function, that sends a request to localhost:8080/STEP/api/explain/resorceName and gets a description for this resource. Description looks like this: http://jsonblob.com/534fc022e4b0bb44248d6460 After receiving a response - I start building input fields like follows (allFields - array of field objects for this resource, enumValues - enum values for resource's field if it's property isEnum = true): <div ng-repeat="field in allFields"> <div ng-show={{!field.isEnum}}> <p ng-show={{field.isRequired}}>{{field.name}}*: </p> <p ng-show={{!field.isRequired}}>{{field.name}}: </p> <input type="text" ng-model="updateEntityResource[field.name]" ng-change="getUpdateEntityAsText()" class="form-control" placeholder="{{parseClassName(field.type)}}"> </div> <div ng-show={{field.isEnum}}> <p ng-show={{field.isRequired}}>{{field.name}}*: </p> <p ng-show={{!field.isRequired}}>{{field.name}}: </p> <select ng-model="updateEntityResource[field.name]" ng-change="getUpdateEntityAsText()" class="form-control"> <option></option> <option ng-repeat="enumValue in field.enumValues" label={{enumValue.name}}>{{enumValue.ordinal}}</option> </select> </div> </div> Now, the problem. I need to create a recursive directive, which would be capable of generating fields in such maner as described above for every resource's field that has "restResourceName" not null. To get all it's fields you just send a request to localhost:8080/STEP/api/explain/restResourceName and get similar JSON response as shown above, which is then used to build HTML elements for inputing values into model. Does anyone know how this can be achieved using angular recursive directive? Every useful answer is highly appreciated and evaluated. The correct answer will get +50 or I will start a bounty, because I'm realy stuck with this for 2 days. If you need any additional info - let me know. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • How can I create a generic constructor? (ie. BaseClass.FromXml(<param>)

    - by SofaKng
    I'm not sure how to describe this but I'm trying to create a base class that contains a shared (factory) function called FromXml. I want this function to instantiate an object of the proper type and then fill it via an XmlDocument. For example, let's say I have something like this: Public Class XmlObject Public Shared Function FromXml(ByVal source as XmlDocument) As XmlObject // <need code to create SPECIFIC TYPE of object and return it End Function End Class Public Class CustomObject Inherits XmlObject End Class I'd like to be able to do something like this: Dim myObject As CustomObject = CustomObject.FromXml(source) Is this possible?

    Read the article

  • save downloaded file automatically in directory using AIR

    - by rie
    i'm newbie, so please help me... package com.func { public class Downloader { import flash.net.FileReference; import flash.net.URLRequest; private var req:URLRequest = new URLRequest(); private var fr:FileReference = new FileReference(); public function Downloader(){ } public function download():void{ req.url = "http://www.yourdomain.com/example.txt"; fr.download(req); } } } how to save downloaded file automatically in file system directory (ex: applicationDirectory as default), without open browse dialog to save the file. thaks....

    Read the article

  • creating button

    - by eomer
    hi I started to learn as3 using fdt i managed to put texts on screen now i want to show the text after the button is clicked but the button does not appear here is the code ` package { import flash.events.MouseEvent; import flash.media.Camera; import mx.controls.Button; import flash.display.Sprite; import flash.text.TextField; public class test2 extends Sprite { private var tField:TextField; public function click(e:MouseEvent):void { tField = new TextField(); tField.text="ffff"; addChild(tField); } public function test2():void { var aa:Button=new Button(); aa.label="deneme"; aa.x=100; aa.y=200; aa.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, click) } } } ` help me pleaseee

    Read the article

  • How to get global access to enum types in C#?

    - by lala
    This is probably a stupid question, but I can't seem to do it. I want to set up some enums in one class like this: public enum Direction { north, east, south, west }; Then have that enum type accessible to all classes so that some other class could for instance have: Direction dir = north; and be able to pass the enum type between classes: public void changeDirection(Direction direction) { dir = direction; } I thought that setting the enum to public would make this automatically possible, but it doesn't seem to be visible outside of the class I declared the enum in.

    Read the article

  • Why in the following code the output is different when I compile or run it more than once

    - by Sanjeev
    class Name implements Runnable { public void run() { for (int x = 1; x <= 3; x++) { System.out.println("Run by " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + ", x is " + x); } } } public class Threadtest { public static void main(String [] args) { // Make one Runnable Name nr = new Name(); Thread one = new Thread(nr); Thread two = new Thread(nr); Thread three = new Thread(nr); one.setName("A"); two.setName("B"); three.setName("C"); one.start(); two.start(); three.start(); } } The answer is different while compiling and running more then one time I don't know why? any idea.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428  | Next Page >