Search Results

Search found 1292 results on 52 pages for 'martin liversage'.

Page 43/52 | < Previous Page | 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50  | Next Page >

• I can't get click and drag to work with my Wacom Bamboo P&T

  - by Magnus Hoff

  I get my Wacom Bamboo Pen & Touch apparently working (By using Martin Owens' PPA), but whenever I try to click and drag something -- for example to move a window -- it will only register as a click. In other words: The "button up" event is generated right after the "button down" event no matter how long I hold it in. This is the same whether I use the tip of the pen, the buttons on the pen or the buttons on the pad. However: Clicking and dragging works perfectly in the login-screen, both before logging in for the first time and after logging out.

  Read the article

• Tab Sweep: Logging, WebSocket, NoSQL, Vaadin, RESTful, Task Scheduling, Environment Entries, ...

  - by arungupta

  Recent Tips and News on Java, Java EE 6, GlassFish & more : • Detailed Logging Output with GlassFish Server, Hibernate, and Log4j (wikis.oracle.com) • Serving Static Content on WebLogic and GlassFish (Colm Divilly) • Java EE and communication between applications (Martin Crosnier) • What are the new features in Java EE 6? (jguru) • Standardizing JPA for NoSQL: are we there yet? (Emmanuel) • Create an Asynchronous JAX-WS Web Service and call it from Oracle BPEL 11g (Bob) • Programmatic Login to Vaadin application with JAAS utilizing JavaEE6 features and Spring injection (vaadin) • Is in an EJB injected EntityManager thread-safe? (Adam Bien) • Websocket using Glassfish (demj33) • Designing and Testing RESTful web services [ UML, REST CLIENT ] (Mamadou Lamine Ba) • Glassfish hosting -Revion.com Glassfish Oracle hosting (revion.com) • Task Scheduling in Java EE 6 on GlassFish using the Timer Service (Micha Kops) • JEE 6 Environmental Enterprise Entries and Glassfish (Slim Ouertani) • Top 10 Causes of Java EE Enterprise Performance Problems (Pierre - Hugues Charbonneau)

  Read the article

• Arrow ECS: VAD mit Weitblick

  - by A&C Redaktion

  Die Arrow ECS unterstützt Oracle Partner dabei, sich dauerhaft erfolgreich zu etablieren. Als Value Added Distributor, kurz VAD, für das Oracle Soft- und Hardware Portfolio bietet Arrow wertvolle Mehrwertdienstleistungen für Partner an, etwa in den Bereichen Consulting, Vertrieb und Produktmarketing. Der Vorteil: Die Partner können sich voll auf ihr Kerngeschäft konzentrieren. Wie die Zusammenarbeit genau funktioniert, erklären Martin Wilhelm, Manager Business Unit Enterprise Solutions, Herbert Varga vom Product Management und die Sales-Expertin für Oracle Produkte, Maria Keller, im Video. Arrow ECS steht für kompetente und zuverlässige Zusammenarbeit mit dem Partner und wurde bereits mehrfach zum Oracle Global Value Added Distributor des Jahres gekürt

  Read the article

• Arrow ECS: VAD mit Weitblick

  - by A&C Redaktion

  Die Arrow ECS unterstützt Oracle Partner dabei, sich dauerhaft erfolgreich zu etablieren. Als Value Added Distributor, kurz VAD, für das Oracle Soft- und Hardware Portfolio bietet Arrow wertvolle Mehrwertdienstleistungen für Partner an, etwa in den Bereichen Consulting, Vertrieb und Produktmarketing. Der Vorteil: Die Partner können sich voll auf ihr Kerngeschäft konzentrieren. Wie die Zusammenarbeit genau funktioniert, erklären Martin Wilhelm, Manager Business Unit Enterprise Solutions, Herbert Varga vom Product Management und die Sales-Expertin für Oracle Produkte, Maria Keller, im Video. Arrow ECS steht für kompetente und zuverlässige Zusammenarbeit mit dem Partner und wurde bereits mehrfach zum Oracle Global Value Added Distributor des Jahres gekürt

  Read the article

• INFORMATION INDEPTH NEWSLETTER Database Insider June Edition

  - by jgelhaus

  Top News Stories include: Oracle #1 in RDBMS Share Gartner released its 2011 worldwide RDBMS market share research based on total software revenues, Market Share: All Software Markets, Worldwide 2011, and Oracle remained first in worldwide RDBMS share in 2011. KScope12:  The Oracle Development Tools User Group Conference The Oracle Development Tools User Group (ODTUG) will hold its annual conference, known as Kscope, in San Antonio, Texas, June 24–28. We asked ODTUG's Vice President Monty Latiolais for a sneak preview—and to share strategies for getting the most out of the event. New Independent Report Endorses Oracle Database Firewall In a new KuppingerCole Product Research Note, Martin Kuppinger concludes that Oracle Database Firewall "should definitely be evaluated and is amongst the recommended products in the database security market segment."  Check out the full edition today!

  Read the article

• Make Your Own Origami Star Wars Ships [D.I.Y. Fun]

  - by Asian Angel

  So there you are with a bit of time to kill at work on Friday afternoon or perhaps you are looking for something fun to get into over weekend…what to do? Perhaps an origami project building an awesome fleet of Star Wars ships is the perfect thing to get into! Once you visit the website click on the Gallery Link to view multiple pictures of specific ships or go to Gallery - Diagrams to download your own copy of the ‘Diagrams + Crease Patterns’ that Martin has made available online so far. Here is the video with step-by-step-instructions for making a Naboo Starfighter… Note: Visiting the YouTube link for this video will show more videos by various individuals in the sidebar area for more Star Wars origami goodness! 6 Ways Windows 8 Is More Secure Than Windows 7 HTG Explains: Why It’s Good That Your Computer’s RAM Is Full 10 Awesome Improvements For Desktop Users in Windows 8

  Read the article

• When is a Use Case layer needed?

  - by Meta-Knight

  In his blog post The Clean Architecture Uncle Bob suggests a 4-layer architecture. I understand the separation between business rules, interfaces and infrastructure, but I wonder if/when it's necessary to have separate layers for domain objects and use cases. What added value will it bring, compared to just having the uses cases as "domain services" in the domain layer? The only useful info I've found on the web about a use case layer is an article by Martin Fowler, who seems to contradict Uncle Bob about its necessity: At some point I may run into the problems, and then I'll make a Use Case Controller - but only then. And even when I do that I rarely consider the Use Case Controllers to occupy a separate layer in the system architecture. Edit: I stumbled upon a video of Uncle Bob's Architecture: The Lost Years keynote, in which he explains this architecture in depth. Very informative.

  Read the article

• What is Object Oriented Programming ill-suited for?

  - by Richard JP Le Guen

  In Martin Fowler's book Refactoring, Fowler speaks of how when developers learn something new, they don't consider when it's inappropriate for the job: Ten years ago it was like that with objects. If someone asked me when not to use objects, it was hard to answer. [...] It was just that I didn't know what those limitations were, although I knew what the benefits were. Reading this, it occurred to me I don't know what the limitations or potential disadvantages of Object-Oriented Programming are. What are the limitations of Object Oriented Programming? When should one look at a project and think "OOP is not best suited for this"?

  Read the article

• Is BDD actually writable by non-programmers?

  - by MattiSG

  Behavior-Driven Development with its emblematic “Given-When-Then” scenarios syntax has lately been quite hyped for its possible uses as a boundary object for software functionality assessment. I definitely agree that Gherkin, or whichever feature definition script you prefer, is a business-readable DSL, and already provides value as such. However, I disagree that it is writable by non-programmers (as does Martin Fowler). Does anyone have accounts of scenarios being written by non-programmers, then instrumented by developers? If there is indeed a consensus on the lack of writability, then would you see a problem with a tool that, instead of starting with the scenarios and instrumenting them, would generate business-readable scenarios from the actual tests?

  Read the article

• What is Object Oriented Programming ill-suited for?

  - by LeguRi

  In Martin Fowler's book Refactoring, Fowler speaks of how when developers learn something new, they don't consider when it's inappropriate for the job: Ten years ago it was like that with objects. If someone asked me when not to use objects, it was hard to answer. [...] It was just that I didn't know what those limitations were, although I knew what the benefits were. Reading this, it occurred to me I don't know what the limitations or potential disadvantages of Object-Oriented Programming are. What are the limitations of Object Oriented Programming? When should one look at a project and think "OOP is not best suited for this"?

  Read the article

• First languages with generic programming support

  - by oluies

  Which was the first language with generic programming support, and what was the first major staticly typed language (widely used) with generics support. Generics implement the concept of parameterized types to allow for multiple types. The term generic means "pertaining to or appropriate to large groups of classes." I have seen the following mentions of "first": First-order parametric polymorphism is now a standard element of statically typed programming languages. Starting with System F [20,42] and functional programming lan- guages, the constructs have found their way into mainstream languages such as Java and C#. In these languages, first-order parametric polymorphism is usually called generics. From "Generics of a Higher Kind", Adriaan Moors, Frank Piessens, and Martin Odersky Generic programming is a style of computer programming in which algorithms are written in terms of to-be-specified-later types that are then instantiated when needed for specific types provided as parameters. This approach, pioneered by Ada in 1983 From Wikipedia Generic Programming

  Read the article

• Something confusing about Single Responsibility Principle

  - by user1483278

  1) In fact if two responsibilities are always expected to change at the same time you arguably should not separate them into different classes as this would lead, to quote Martin, to a "smell of Needless Complexity". The same is the case for responsibilities that never change - the behavior is invariant, and there is no need to split it. I assume even if non-related responsibilities are always expected to change for the same reason ( or if they never change ), we still shouldn't put them in the same class, since this would still violate high cohesion principle? 2) I've found two quite different definitions for SRP: Single Responsibility Principle says that a subsystem, module, class, or even a function, should not have more than one reason to change. and There should never be more than one reason for a class to change Doesn't the latter definition narrow SRP to a class level? If so, isn't first quote wrong by claiming that SRP can also be applied at subsystem, module and function levels? thank you

  Read the article

• Is committing/checking code everyday a good practice?

  - by ArtB

  I've been reading Martin Fowler's note on Continuous Integration and he lists as a must "Everyone Commits To the Mainline Every Day". I do not like to commit code unless the section I'm working on is complete and that in practice I commit my code every three days: one day to investigate/reproduce the task and make some preliminary changes, a second day to complete the changes, and a third day to write the tests and clean it up^ for submission. I would not feel comfortable submitting the code sooner. Now, I pull changes from the repository and integrate them locally usually twice a day, but I do not commit that often unless I can carve out a smaller piece of work. Question: is committing everyday such a good practice that I should change my workflow to accomodate it, or it is not that advisable? ^ The order is more arbitrary and depends on the task, my point was to illustrate the time span and activities, not the exact sequence.

  Read the article

• Jersey 2.0 Integrated into GlassFish 4.0

  - by Jakub Podlesak

  The latest promoted build of GlassFish 4.0 (glassfish-4.0-b43.zip) now contains upgraded Jersey version, 2.0-m05. Users are getting an early access to the implementation of some parts of the JAX-RS 2.0 API Early Draft Review 3. The appropriate JAX-RS bundle, version 2.0-m09 , gets bundled into GlassFish 4.0 as well. What should work The simple answer is: all the basic stuff. We have particularly tested the following two examples: simple hello world webapp multipart webapp Both above linked archives contain adjusted projects, so that resulting war files do not bundle any Jersey dependencies. Both also use Jersey 2 specific Servlet class, org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.ServletContainer, for deployment. See Martin's blog post on how to package war applications capable of running with both Jersey 1 and Jersey 2 ServletContainer classes. What has not been covered yet The main areas, which have not been touched yet in Jersey 2 are: EJB integration CDI integration Validation These are also the areas where we are going to spend the most of our cycles in the coming month.

  Read the article

• First languages with generic programming support

  - by oluies

  Which was the first language with generic programming support, and what was the first major staticly typed language (widely used) with generics support. Generics implement the concept of parameterized types to allow for multiple types. The term generic means "pertaining to or appropriate to large groups of classes." I have seen the following mentions of "first": First-order parametric polymorphism is now a standard element of statically typed programming languages. Starting with System F [20,42] and functional programming lan- guages, the constructs have found their way into mainstream languages such as Java and C#. In these languages, first-order parametric polymorphism is usually called generics. From "Generics of a Higher Kind", Adriaan Moors, Frank Piessens, and Martin Odersky Generic programming is a style of computer programming in which algorithms are written in terms of to-be-specified-later types that are then instantiated when needed for specific types provided as parameters. This approach, pioneered by Ada in 1983 From Wikipedia Generic Programming

  Read the article

• Are there any examples of a temporal field/object updater?

  - by Bryan Agee

  The system in question has numerous examples of temporal objects and fields--ones which are a certain variable at a certain point in time. An example of this would be someone's rate of pay--there are different answers depending on when you ask and what the constraints might be; eg, can there ever be more than one of a certain temporal object concurrently, etc. Ideally, there would be an object that handles those constraints when a new state/stateful object is introduced; when a new value is set, it would prevent creating negative ranges and overlaps. Martin Fowler has written some great material on this (such as this description of Temporal Objects) , but what I've found of it tends to be entirely theoretic, with no concrete implementations. PHP is the target language, but examples in any language would be most helpful.

  Read the article

• Microsoft et le Stade Toulousain mettent de l'IT dans leurs vêtements, quelles applications imaginez-vous pour ces nouveaux habits ?

  Bientôt de l'IT jusque dans nos vêtements Robe tweeteuse, T-Shirt promotionnel pour club de Rugby : quelles applications imaginez-vous pour ces nouvelles générations d'habits ? En collaboration avec Gordon Fowler « The Printing Dress » est une création de deux designers expérimentées travaillant pour Microsoft Research, Asta Roseway et Sheridan Martin Petit. Réalisée à partir de papier de riz noir et blanc, la robe intègre des boutons rappelant les touches des anciennes machines à écrire, cousus sur le corsage de la robe. Un ordinateur portable, un projecteur et quatre cartes de circuits y sont également intégrés. Bien qu'étant encore un prototyp...

  Read the article

• Constraints while designing the Java generics

  - by Andrea

  Java generics look quite different from those available in Scala, although both were designed by Martin Odersky. From my point of view, the design of generics in Java is worse, for instance: there is no possibility to specify variance one can get around the previous limitation by using wildcards, but this means the burden of specifying variance goes on the caller instead of the library designer one cannot use a type constructor in generics What were the constraints in Java that forced Odersky to design this mechanism for generics instead of the more flexible one he devised for Scala? Was he just savvier a few years later or there were actual limitations due to Java?

  Read the article

• JCP activities at Devoxx 2013!

  - by Heather VanCura

  Devoxx 2013 has officially started! Looking forward to catching up with Java community member friends--old and new this week. Tuesday (today) the Hackergarten has returned to Devoxx!  There are Java EE 7 tables and Java SE 8 Lambda tables.  Kudos to Andres Almirey for organizing the event and to Arun Gupta and Stuart Marks for leading the activities -- awesome Adopt-a-JSR participation in action! Wednesday there is a JCP 'quickie' session How to Participate in the Future of Java Quickie at 13:35-13:50.  We will also have a chat with the OTN team afterward!  Wednesday evening at 21:00, join us for our BOF session with Martin Verburg and Johan Vos: JCP & Adopt-a-JSR Workshop BOF. 

  Read the article

• JAX Innovation Awards 2011

  - by Tori Wieldt

  The JAX Innovation Awards were presented tonight at the JAX Conference in San Jose, California, to reward those technologies, companies, organizations and individuals that make outstanding contributions to Java. The winners were:     •    Most Innovative Java Technology - JRebel    •    Most Innovative Java Company - Red Hat    •    Top Java Community Ambassador - Martin Odersky    •    Special Jury Award - Brian GoetzIn addition to being acknowledged best-in-class by peers from the Java community, winners received $2500 each. The JAXConf team took nominations from the community, had them reviewed by a panel of independent experts to create a shortlist, which was then voted on by the Java community."The java culture inspires innovation" said Sebastian Meyen, JAX Conference Chair, "and we are happy to reward that."  

  Read the article

• Who are the thought leaders in software engineering/development? [closed]

  - by Mohsin Hijazee

  Possible Duplicate: What are the big contemporary names in the programming field? I am sorry if it is a duplicate questions or is useless. I want to compile a list of influential people in our industry who can be termed as "opinionated" and thought leaders. There are basically two characteristics that I'm referring to here: The person has introduced new concepts/terminology/trends or talked about existing ones in thought provoking way. Majority or part of the writings are available online. Some of the people who I think as thought leaders are as under: Martin Fowler Known for domain specific languages, Active Record, IoC. Joel Spolsky known for his 12 point Joel test, Law of Leaky abstractions. Kent Beck known for XP. Paul Graham. Any other names and links?

  Read the article

• Is there a good book or articles to learn about 2D Game Design and Effects?

  - by user28015

  I am not looking for a read how to develop games and how to implement one. I am looking for a general about possible effects in 2D Games and about general design of modern 2D gaming. I have programmed several smaller games over the years and also read books like "Golden Rules of Game Programming" by Martin Bronwlo. So I know how to implement games. What I am looking for are 2 things: Finishing touches such as effects like explosions, particles etc. Not how to make them, but how to design them so it looks right and cool. How to make a 2D game feel "more right" so that users get a satisfying gaming experience. I played a lot of 2D games but I could use some more advice.

  Read the article

• ArchBeat Link-o-Rama for November 7, 2012

  - by Bob Rhubart

  Updated Business Activity Monitoring (BAM) Class | @OracleSOA Oracle SOA Team blogger Gary Barg has news for those interested in a skills upgrade. This updated Oracle University course "explains how to use Oracle BAM to monitor enterprise business activities across an enterprise in real time. You can measure your key performance indicators (KPIs), determine whether you are meeting service-level agreements (SLAs), and take corrective action in real time." Oracle Solaris 11.1 update focuses on database integration, cloud | @markfontecchio TechTarget editor Mark Fontecchio reports on the recent Oracle Solaris 11.1 release, with comments from IDC's Al Gillen. Thought for the Day "Why is composing symphonies tough? I don't know. It's just very few people in the world can do it well. And I think that's the case with upfront design. It is very hard to do well." — Martin Fowler Source: SoftwareQuotes.com

  Read the article

• First Typemock Academy - 4 days from now

  This April 27th marks a special occasion for Typemock the first Typemock Partner Conference is about to take place in Oslo, Norway. Some special treats are expected (including a very cool after party), and Uncle Bob Martin and myself will be doing a special Q&A video conference live with the attendees as part of it. Attendance is by invite only, but you can see if youre eligible by going to this page and filling out your details. ...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

  Read the article

• The rule of 5 - to use it or not?

  - by VJovic

  The rule of 3 (the rule of 5 in the new c++ standard) states : If you need to explicitly declare either the destructor, copy constructor or copy assignment operator yourself, you probably need to explicitly declare all three of them. But, on the other hand, the Martin's "Clean Code" advises to remove all empty constructors and destructors (page 293, G12:Clutter) : Of what use is a default constructor with no implementation? All it serves to do is clutter up the code with meaningless artifacts. So, how to handle these two opposite opinions? Should empty constructors/destructors really be implemented?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50  | Next Page >