Search Results

Search found 46088 results on 1844 pages for 'class loader'.

Page 447/1844 | < Previous Page | 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454  | Next Page >

  • Django. Invalid keyword argument for this function. ManyToMany

    - by sagem_tetra
    I have this error: 'people' is an invalid keyword argument for this function class Passage(models.Model): name= models.CharField(max_length = 255) who = models.ForeignKey(UserProfil) class UserPassage(models.Model): passage = models.ForeignKey(Passage) people = models.ManyToManyField(UserProfil, null=True) class UserProfil(models.Model): user = models.OneToOneField(User) name = models.CharField(max_length=50) I try: def join(request): user = request.user user_profil = UserProfil.objects.get(user=user) passage = Passage.objects.get(id=2) #line with error up = UserPassage.objects.create(people= user_profil, passage=passage) return render_to_response('thanks.html') How to do correctly? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Encapsulating a Windows.Forms.Button

    - by devoured elysium
    I want to define a special kind of button that only allows two possible labels: "ON" and "OFF". I decided to inherit from a Windows.Forms.Button to implement this but now I don't know I how should enforce this rule. Should I just override the Text property like this? public override string Text { set { throw new InvalidOperationException("Invalid operation on StartStopButton!"); } } The problem I see with this is that I am breaking the contract that all buttons should have. If any code tries something like foreach (Button button in myForm) { button.Text = "123"; } they will get an Exception if I have any of my special buttons on the form, which is something that isn't expectable. First, because people think of properties just as "public" variables, not methods, second, because they are used to using and setting whatever they want to buttons without having to worry with Exceptions. Should I instead just make the set property do nothing? That could also lead to awkward results: myButton.Text = "abc"; MessageBox.Show(abc); //not "abc"! The general idea from the OO world is to in this kind of cases use Composition instead of inheritance. public class MySpecialButton : <Some class from System.Windows.Forms that already knows how to draw itself on forms> private Button button = new Button(); //I'd just draw this button on this class //and I'd then only show the fields I consider //relevant to the outside world. ... } But to make the Button "live" on a form it must inherit from some special class. I've looked on Control, but it seems to already have the Text property defined. I guess the ideal situation would be to inherit from some kind of class that wouldn't even have the Text property defined, but that'd have position, size, etc properties available. Upper in the hierarchy, after Control, we have Component, but that looks like a really raw class. Any clue about how to achieve this? I know this was a long post :( Thanks

    Read the article

  • android : Dynamically changing the content of tab

    - by Jomia
    I want to change the content of a tab? when tha tab is created i set the content of the tab by setContent() method. But if I click again, I want to change the content that means change to another activity. I used setOnTabChangedListener() method, but I am not sure about how to set the content to another intent? Resources res = getResources(); TabHost tabHost=getTabHost(); tabHost.addTab(tabHost.newTabSpec("tab1").setIndicator("HOME").setContent(new Intent(getBaseContext(),homeGroup.class))); tabHost.addTab(tabHost.newTabSpec("tab2").setIndicator("ABOUT US").setContent(new Intent(getBaseContext(),aboutusGroup.class))); tabHost.setCurrentTab(0); tabHost.setOnTabChangedListener(new OnTabChangeListener() { @Override public void onTabChanged(String tabId) { //here i want to set the content of each tab to another intent // for 'tab1', change to home.class // for 'tab2', change to aboutus.class //how to set these? } }); Please help me.. Thank you..

    Read the article

  • css of pagination links

    - by fusion
    i'd like a basic idea of how to go about formatting the following paging of the search result. this is the paging code: //Create and print the Navigation bar $nav=""; $next = $page+1; $prev = $page-1; if($page > 1) { $nav .= "<div class=\"search_mainpg\"><div class=\"searchpage\" style=\"width:5%;\"><a onclick=\"showPage('','$prev'); return false;\" href=\"$self?page=" . $prev . "&q=" .urlencode($search_result) . "\">< Prev</a></div>"; $first = "<div class=\"searchpage\" style=\"width:2%;\"><a onclick=\"showPage('','1'); return false;\" href=\"$self?page=1&q=" .urlencode($search_result) . "\"> << </a></div>" ; } else { $nav .= "&nbsp;"; $first = "&nbsp;"; } for($i = 1 ; $i <= $numpages ; $i++) { if($i == $page) { $nav .= "<b>$i</b>"; }else{ $nav .= "<div class=\"searchpage\" style=\"width:2%;\"><a onclick=\"showPage('',$i); return false;\" href=\"$self?page=" . $i . "&q=" .urlencode($search_result) . "\">$i</a></div>"; } } if($page < $numpages) { $nav .= "<div class=\"searchpage\" style=\"width:5%;\"><a onclick=\"showPage('','$next'); return false;\" href=\"$self?page=" . $next . "&q=" .urlencode($search_result) . "\">Next ></a></div>"; $last = "<div class=\"searchpage\" style=\"width:2%;\"><a onclick=\"showPage('','$numpages'); return false;\" href=\"$self?page=$numpages&q=" .urlencode($search_result) . "\"> >> </a></div></div>"; } else { $nav .= "&nbsp;"; $last = "&nbsp;"; } echo $first . $nav . $last; currently, it displays like this:

    Read the article

  • final fields and thread-safety

    - by pcjuzer
    Should it be all fields, including super-fields, of a purposively immutable java class 'final' in order to be thread-safe or is it enough to have no modifier methods? Suppose I have a POJO with non-final fields where all fields are type of some immutable class. This POJO has getters-setters, and a constructor wich sets some initial value. If I extend this POJO with knocking out modifier methods, thus making it immutable, will extension class be thread-safe?

    Read the article

  • C# equivalent of typeof for fields

    - by rwallace
    With reflection, you can look up a class from a string at run time, but you can also say typeof(Foo) and get compile time type checking, auto completion etc. If what you want is a field not a class, you can look it up from a string at runtime, but if you want compile time type checking etc., is there anyway to say something like fieldof(Foo.Bar)? I know the name of both the class and the field in advance, and I want to be able to refer to the field at compile time rather than with a run-time string lookup.

    Read the article

  • How To Write Selenium Xpath

    - by user3690563
    I am Struck here. I am Trying a write Xpath for the Code in the image. I am Trying to click Browse TAB. Where the ID is changing every time. Help me guys. Thanks you in Advance I have tried this as my Xpath //*[@id='ext-gen43']/em/span/span <a id="ext-gen43" class="x-tab-right" href="#"> <em class="x-tab-left"> <span class="x-tab-strip-inner"> <span class="x-tab-strip-text ">Browse</span> </span> </em> </a>

    Read the article

  • jquery 1.3 not(:first) problem in IE

    - by sunil-mand99
    Hi, i have 3 div tags of same class, <div class="redc"> <p>sdfs</p> </div> <div class="redc"> <p>sdfs</p> </div> <div class="redc"> <p>sdfs</p> </div> to select div other than first ,$(".redc:not(:first)") works fine in mozilla,but not in IE Please suggest any alternative for IE Note: vesion jquery 1.3

    Read the article

  • how to get something to display only once in a while loop

    - by Matt Nathanson
    I've got a mysql query running and it checks to see if an iterator is equal to 1, then display this div title... if ($this->dliterator == 1) {echo "<div class='clientsection' id='downloads'>Downloads</div><br/>";}; The problem is, is that the dl iterator may not necessarily start at 1. (it is directly related to a downloadid from the database). How can I get this to display only for the first time through the loop ONLY? while ($row = mysql_fetch_assoc($result)) { if ($row['download'] != null){ if ($this->dliterator == 1) {echo "<div class='clientsection' id='downloads'>Downloads</div><br/>";}; if ($editDownload == 1) { echo "<div class='clientlink' style='margin-top: 15px;'>"; echo "<input name='downloads[$this->dliterator][name]' type='text' id='download$this->dliterator' value='" . $row['download'] . "'/>"; echo "<input name='downloads[$this->dliterator][title]' type='text' id='downloadtitle$this->dliterator' value='" . $row['downloadtitle'] . "'/>"; echo "<img class='removelink' src='/images/deletelink.png' width='15' />"; echo "<input id='downloadid' name='downloads[$this->dliterator][id]' type='hidden' value='".$row['downloadid']."' style='display: none'/>"; echo "<br/><img id='uploaddownload$uploaditerator' class='uploaddownload' src='../images/upload.png' width='80'/>"; echo "</div>"; }; }; $this->dliterator++; $uploaditerator++; };

    Read the article

  • Asp.net static object behaviour

    - by Circadian
    I have the following class as part of an asp.net application. public sealed class SomeClass { private static string appId = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(); public static ReadSomethingFromDb(){} public static WriteSomethingToDb(){} } There are more than one application instances in the same application pool, and they all access the same database. I want the operations performed by the above class to be uniquely tied to the instance that performed it, hence the use of the appId. So adding a record to the database would for example contain a name, address and appId. This has been simplified for discussion purposes. Assuming that I have two instances running at mysite.a and mysite.b the above class would generate two different guids. My problem is that mysite.a sometimes produces more than one guid, which is unexpected. Thank you in advance

    Read the article

  • Calling a constructor to reinitialize variables doesn't seem to work?

    - by Matt
    I wanted to run 1,000 iterations of a program, so set a counter for 1000 in main. I needed to reinitialize various variables after each iteration, and since the class constructor had all the initializations already written out - I decided to call that after each iteration, with the result of each iteration being stored in a variable in main. However, when I called the constructor, it had no effect...it took me a while to figure out - but it didn't reinitialize anything! I created a function exactly like the constructor - so the object would have its own version. When I called that, it reinitialized everything as I expected. int main() { Class MyClass() int counter = 0; while ( counter < 1000 ) { stuff happens } Class(); // This is how I tried to call the constructor initially. // After doing some reading here, I tried: // Class::Class(); // - but that didn't work either /* Later I used... MyClass.function_like_my_constructor; // this worked perfectly */ } ...Could someone try to explain why what I did was wrong, or didn't work, or was silly or what have you? I mean - mentally, I just figured - crap, I can call this constructor and have all this stuff reinitialized. Are constructors (ideally) ONLY called when an object is created?

    Read the article

  • ZF2 namespace and file system

    - by user1918648
    I have standard Application module in ZF2. It's configured by default, I didn't change anything. I just added some stuff: module/ Application/ src/ Application/ Entity/ Product/ **Product.php** Controller/ **IndexController.php** Product.php namespace Application\Entity; class Product { } IndexController.php namespace Application\Controller; use Zend\Mvc\Controller\AbstractActionController; use Zend\View\Model\ViewModel; use Application\Entity\Product; class IndexController extends AbstractActionController { public function indexAction() { $product = new Product(); } } and I get following error: Fatal error: Class 'Application\Entity\Product' not found in \module\Application\src\Application\Controller\IndexController.php on line 20 I use the same namespace, but it doesn't see it. Why? P.S: If I will change Product.php to be the following: namespace Application\Entity\Product; class Product { } then in the IndexController.php the following code will be working: namespace Application\Controller; use Zend\Mvc\Controller\AbstractActionController; use Zend\View\Model\ViewModel; use Application\Entity\Product\Product; class IndexController extends AbstractActionController { public function indexAction() { $product = new Product(); } }

    Read the article

  • A loop (while/foreach) with "offset" wrapping and

    - by DarkGhostHunter
    After applying what wrapping objects using math operator, I just tought it will be over. But no. By far. <?php $faces= array( 1 => '<div class="block">happy</div>', 2 => '<div class="block">sad</div>', (sic) 21 => '<div class="block">angry</div>' ); $i = 1; foreach ($faces as $face) { echo $face; if ($i == 3) echo '<div class="block">This is and ad</div>'; if ($i % 3 == 0) { echo "<br />"; // or some other wrapping thing } $i++; } ?> In the code I have to put and ad after the second one, becoming by that the third object. And then wrap the three all in a <div class="row"> (a br after won't work out by design reasons). I thought I will going back to applying a switch, but if somebody put more elements in the array that the switch can properly wrap, the last two remaining elements are wrapped openly. Can i add the "ad" to the array in the third position? That would make things simplier, only leaving me with guessing how to wrap the first and the third, the fourth and the sixth, an so on.

    Read the article

  • PHP: constant as variable in function

    - by m4recek
    I'm trying to use constant as a function paramter, is it possible to check type of this constant. Example of what I want: class ApiError { const INVALID_REQUEST = 200; } class Response { public function status(ApiError $status) { //function code here } } USE: $response = new Response(); $response->status(ApiError::INVALID_REQUEST); This shoud check that given $status is constant of class ApiError. Is something like this possible?

    Read the article

  • Android HTTP get methods

    - by Nick
    I have written a number of applications for blackberry and am just starting in Android. It seems to me that android has a lot more built in functions. I am starting by recreating some of my BB apps on Android and on one I take a few xml sites and parse them out. On blackberry I implemented this by creating a class that extended a thread. I would construct a new instance of this class with the parameters of my http request and it would call a function back in my main class, sending it the results. I am tempted to reuse my code, but am curious if android has something better built in. I have been looking at the handler class as well as possible using a service. Bascially, I would like to start a new thread that will return a document of a specific url. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Drupal 6, how to identify active menu item by url parameters (full link), ?q=page1&filter=10

    - by OlgaV
    I have a submenu that has all items linked to the same node, but with different additional parameters, for ex: ... <li...><a href = "/?q=page1&filter=10" class = "... active">Item1</a></li> <li...><a href = "/?q=page1&filter=11" class = "... active">Item2</a></li> ... in this case all items have class 'active' and none of them has class 'active-trail'. Is there any way to identify the true active link (for styling purposes)? any suggestions will be much appreciated!

    Read the article

  • undefined method `new_record?' for nil:NilClass

    - by TopperH
    In rails 3.2 I created a post controller. Each post can have a different number of paperclip attachments. To achieve this I created a assets model where each asset has a paperclip attachment. One post has_many assets and assets belong_to post. Asset model class Asset < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :post has_attached_file :photo, :styles => { :thumb => "200x200>" } end Post model class Post < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :content, :title has_many :assets, :dependent => :destroy validates_associated :assets after_update :save_assets def new_asset_attributes=(asset_attributes) asset_attributes.each do |attributes| assets.build(attributes) end end def existing_asset_attributes=(asset_attributes) assets.reject(&:new_record?).each do |asset| attributes = asset_attributes[asset.id.to_s] if attributes asset.attributes = attributes else asset.delete(asset) end end end def save_assets assets.each do |asset| asset.save(false) end end end Posts helper module PostsHelper def add_asset_link(name) link_to_function name do |post| post.insert_html :bottom, :assets, :partial => 'asset', :object => Asset.new end end end Form for post <%= form_for @post, :html => { :multipart => true } do |f| %> <% if @post.errors.any? %> <div id="error_explanation"> <h2><%= pluralize(@post.errors.count, "error") %> prohibited this post from being saved:</h2> <ul> <% @post.errors.full_messages.each do |msg| %> <li><%= msg %></li> <% end %> </ul> </div> <% end %> <div class="field"> <%= f.label :title %><br /> <%= f.text_field :title %> </div> <div class="field"> <%= f.label :content %><br /> <%= f.text_area :content %> </div> <div id="assets"> Attach a file or image<br /> <%= render 'asset', :collection => @post.assets %> </div> <div class="actions"> <%= f.submit %> </div> <% end %> Asset partial <div class="asset"> <% new_or_existing = asset.new_record? ? 'new' : 'existing' %> <% prefix = "post[#{new_or_existing}_asset_attributes][]" %> <% fields_for prefix, asset do |asset_form| -%> <p> Asset: <%= asset_form.file_field :photo %> <%= link_to_function "remove", "$(this).up('.asset').remove()" %> </p> <% end -%> </div> Most of the code is taken from here: https://gist.github.com/33011 and I understand this is a rails2 app, anyway I don't understand what this error means: undefined method `new_record?' for nil:NilClass Extracted source (around line #2): 1: <div class="asset"> 2: <% new_or_existing = asset.new_record? ? 'new' : 'existing' %> 3: <% prefix = "post[#{new_or_existing}_asset_attributes][]" %> 4: 5: <% fields_for prefix, asset do |asset_form| -%>

    Read the article

  • C++ Inheritance Question

    - by shaz
    I have a base class MessageHandler and 2 derived classes, MessageHandler_CB and MessageHandler_DQ. The derived classes redefine the handleMessage(...) method. MH_DQ processes a message and puts the result in a deque while MH_CB processes the message and then executes a callback function. The base class has a static callback function that I pass along with a this pointer to a library which calls the static callback when a new message is available for processing. My problem comes when I am in the static callback with a void * pointing to either a MH_DQ or a MH_CB. If I cast it to the base class the empty MessageHandler::handleMessage(...) method is called, rather than the version in the appropriate derived class. What is the best way to address this situation from a design perspective and/or what language features might help me to implement a solution to my problem? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • null reference problems with c#

    - by alex
    Hi: In one of my window form, I created an instance of a class to do some works in the background. I wanted to capture the debug messages in that class and displayed in the textbox in the window form. Here is what I did: class A //window form class { public void startBackGroundTask() { B backGroundTask = new B(this); } public void updateTextBox(string data) { if (data != null) { if (this.Textbox.InvokeRequired) { appendUIDelegate updateDelegate = new appendUIDelegate(updateUI); try { this.Invoke(updateDelegate, data); } catch (Exception e) { Console.WriteLine(e.Message); } } else { updateUI(data); } } } private void updateUI(string data) { if (this.Textbox.InvokeRequired) { this.Textbox.Invoke(new appendUIDelegate(this.updateUI), data); } else { //update the text box this.Textbox.AppendText(data); this.Textbox.AppendText(Environment.NewLine); } } private delegate void appendUIDelegate(string data); } class B // background task { A curUI; public b( A UI) { curUI = UI; } private void test() { //do some works here then log the debug message to UI. curUI.updateTextBox("message); } } I keep getting a null reference exception after this.Invoke(updateDelegate, data); is called. I know passing "this" as a parameter is strange. But I want to send the debug message to my window form. Please help. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Mock implementations in C++

    - by forneo
    Hi guys, I need a mock implementation of a class - for testing purposes - and I'm wondering how I should best go about doing that. I can think of two general ways: Create an interface that contains all public functions of the class as pure virtual functions, then create a mock class by deriving from it. Mark all functions (well, at least all that are to be mocked) as virtual. I'm used to doing it the first way in Java, and it's quite common too (probably since they have a dedicated interface type). But I've hardly ever seen such interface-heavy designs in C++, thus I'm wondering. The second way will probably work, but I can't help but think of it as kind of ugly. Is anybody doing that? If I follow the first way, I need some naming assistance. I have an audio system that is responsible for loading sound files and playing the loaded tracks. I'm using OpenAL for that, thus I've called the interface "Audio" and the implementation "OpenALAudio". However, this implies that all OpenAL-specific code has to go into that class, which feels kind of limiting. An alternative would be to leave the class' name "Audio" and find a different one for the interface, e.g. "AudioInterface" or "IAudio". Which would you suggest, and why?

    Read the article

  • Determining where a function is defined in C#?

    - by templatetypedef
    Hey all - I am a complete novice at C# (I've never used it before) and recently needed to look over some code written in it. I spent the longest time trying to track down a nonexistent method in a class that didn't seem to be defined anywhere in the class that was using it. I later found out it was an "extension method," which I gather is a method grafted onto another class by some source. I completely understand the rationale behind this language feature and actually think it's quite nice. However, as someone without much experience in the language, it makes it harder to look up unfamiliar methods, since the method in question could be defined anywhere. My question is this: given an unfamiliar method call in C#, what's the best way for me to look up more info on it, given that it could be an extension method defined in an entirely separate class? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Problem with generics

    - by jess
    I have this code in base class protected virtual bool HasAnyStuff<TObject>(TObject obj) where TObject:class { return false; } In child class I am overriding protected override bool HasAnyStuff<Customer>(Customer obj) { //some stuff if Customer.sth etc return false; } I am getting this error '''Type parameter declaration must be an identifier not a type''' What is it I am doing wrong here?

    Read the article

  • how toaccess the attributes in another form? c#

    - by Chelsea_cole
    I have a problem in a same namespace: public partial class frmForm1 : Form // Form1 { public class Account { public string Username; public string Password; } public class ListAcc { public static int count = 0; private static List<Account> UserList; public static List<Account> Data() { return UserList; } } } public partial class frmForm2 : Form // Form2 { private void button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { frmForm1.Account A; string m = frmForm1.ListAcc<A>.[0].Username; //ERROR } } How could i access the attributes (Username, Password...) in frmForm1? Someone help me? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • C++ compile time polymorphism doubt ?

    - by user313921
    Below program contains two show() functions in parent and child classes, but first show() function takes FLOAT argument and second show() function takes INT argument. .If I call show(10.1234) function by passing float argument, it should call class A's show(float a) function , but it calls class B's show(int b). #include<iostream> using namespace std; class A{ float a; public: void show(float a) { this->a = a; cout<<"\n A's show() function called : "<<this->a<<endl; } }; class B : public A{ int b; public: void show(int b) { this->b = b; cout<<"\n B's show() function called : "<<this->b<<endl; } }; int main() { float i=10.1234; B Bobject; Bobject.show((float) i); return 0; } Output: B's show() function called : 10 Expected output: A's show() function called : 10.1234 Why g++ compiler chosen wrong show() function i.e class B's show(int b) function ?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454  | Next Page >