Search Results

Search found 27699 results on 1108 pages for 'oracle remarketer free training'.

Page 447/1108 | < Previous Page | 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454  | Next Page >

  • How to deal with readers requesting free advice / support on my blog? [closed]

    - by russau
    I have a handful of popular articles on my blog (nothing huge), and they attract the occasional developer who wants help implementing some code grabbed from my blog. Now I'm getting people who haven't made any attempt to learn the code, email me their code, and expect me to trace it through for them. I'm sure anyone with a half-popular blog gets similar requests. What's the best way to deal with this scenario? I want to put together a boilerplate response including these points: How far have you gone with this on your own? (is it any benefit for anyone if I say they are being imposing) I'm happy to help with any problems you find in my code Point them to other forms of help such as stackoverflow, diagnostic tools relevant to the topic.

    Read the article

  • Why do I get swap space related errors when I still have lots of free memory in Solaris 10?

    - by Tom Duckering
    I am seeing a few of my services suffering/crashing with errors along the lines of "Error allocating memory" or "Can't create new process" etc. I'm slightly confused by this since logs show that at the time the system has lots of free memory (around 26GB in one case) of memory available and is not particularly stressed in any other way. After noting a JVM crash with similar error with the added query of "Out of swap space?" it made me dig a little deeper. It turns out that someone has configured our zone with a 2GB swap file. Our zone doesn't have capped memory and currently has access to as much of the 128GB of the RAM as it need. Our SAs are planning to cap this at 32GB when they get the chance. My current thinking is that whilst there is memory aplenty for the OS to allocate, the swap space seems grossly undersized (based on other answers here). It seems as though Solaris is wanting to make sure there's enough swap space in case things have to swap out (i.e. it's reserving the swap space). Is this thinking right or is there some other reason that I get memory allocation errors with this large amount of memory free and seemingly undersized swap space?

    Read the article

  • GlassFish Server 3.1 est disponible, avec des améliorations pour l'administration, la haute disponibilité et le développement d'applications

    GlassFish Server 3.1 est disponible Avec des améliorations pour l'administration, le développement d'applications et la haute disponibilité et Oracle vient d'annoncer la disponibilité de son serveur d'applications Java, GlassFish server 3.1. GlassFish Server 3.1 présente des améliorations pour le développement des applications, l'administration centralisée et la haute disponibilité. Cette version permet à Oracle de respecter sa feuille de route présentée lors de la conférence JavaOne 2010 : « avec cette version, Oracle respecte la feuille de route qu'il a annoncé et répond ainsi à la demande croissante pour Oracle GlassFish Server en ajoutant de nouvelles fonctionnalités pour ...

    Read the article

  • OSB unit testing, part 1 by Qualogy

    - by JuergenKress
    First you need to implement the simple bpel process like this : In my current project, I inherited a lot of OSB components that have been developed by (former) team members, but they all lack unit tests. This is a situation I really dislike, since this makes it much harder to refactor or bug-fix the existing code base. So, for all newly created components (and components I have to bug-fix) I strive to add unit tests. Of course, the unit tests will be created using my favourite testing tool: soapUI ! Unit of test The unit test should be created for the service composition, which in OSB terms should be the proxy service combination with its business service. Now, since you do not want to rely on any other services, you should provide mock services for all services invoked from your Component-Under-Test. In a previous article, I wrote about mocking your services in soapUI. While this approach would also be valid here, creating a mock service (and certainly deploying it on a separate WebServer) does violate one of the core principles of unit testing: to make your unit tests as self-contained as possible, i.e. not depending on any external components. In this article, I will show you how to achieve this by simply providing a mock response inside your unit test. Scenario The scenario I implement for testing is a simple currency converter; the external request consists of a from and a to currency, and an amount (in currency from). The service will perform an exchange rate lookup using the WebServiceX CurrencyConverter and return a response to the caller consisting of both the source and target currencies and amounts. For the purpose of unit testing, I will implement a mock response for the exchange rate lookup. Read the complete article here. SOA & BPM Partner Community For regular information on Oracle SOA Suite become a member in the SOA & BPM Partner Community for registration please visit www.oracle.com/goto/emea/soa (OPN account required) If you need support with your account please contact the Oracle Partner Business Center. Blog Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Wiki Technorati Tags: Qualogy,OSB,SOA Community,Oracle SOA,Oracle BPM,Community,OPN,Jürgen Kress

    Read the article

  • Free blog sites where the blogs can (if the template does) validate as XHTML Strict 1.0?

    - by Deleted
    I'm looking for a site where I may register a free blog and have the blog validate as XHTML Strict 1.0. On the surface this may seem like a trivial problem only related to the theme/template in use, but that's unfortunately not the case. One example of a provider which can't fullfill this requirement is Blogger. Altough the pages of the blogs there presents themselfs as XHTML 1.0 Strict it is impossible to actually comply with the requirements inheritied by that markup type in the blog (as the XHTML which is generated by Blogger makes the page as a whole invalid). I've sent a mail to Tumblr to see if it was possible with them, but so far my reply consists of them having forwarded my mail with a "suggestion" to the development department. I don't know if we had a communication error or if I'm actually going to receive a proper answer later. Time will tell. I haven't had time to investigate Tumblr myself, so they may very well be the solution to this problem. To sum things up, I'm looking for any provider: Of a free blog. The blog must have the capability to validate as XHTML Strict 1.0. With capability I mean that the system shouldn't get in the way of creating/using a theme which complies as XHTML Strict 1.0. Preferably is large or at least likely to stay around for a couple of years to come. But I'm willing to take my chances if none of the established providers are up to the task. Thank you for reading! I hope you know of any provider which would be suitable, preferably with proof by linking to a blog there which validates. I'm not looking for suggestions to look into, as there are far to many to investigate and far too little time. If you know of something for sure, I'd be very happy to know about it.

    Read the article

  • Sharepoint courses on Pluralsight

    - by TATWORTH
    I have just heard from Plural Sight that through their partnership with Critical Path training, they are adding 33 new SharePoint courses at no extra cost. The key parts of their announcement at http://blog.pluralsight.com/2012/09/13/critical-path-training-joins-the-pluralsight-library-over-30-sharepoint-courses-today/ is:"Over the next several hours we’ll begin publishing our first set of Critical Path Training online courses, and by the end of the day, you will see a total of 33 new SharePoint courses added to the Pluralsight library! These new courses primarily cover SharePoint 2007 and SharePoint 2010 for developers, administrators, end users, power users, and web designers.""By end of year, we expect to release another 22 courses from Critical Path Training that will exclusively cover the SharePoint 2013 release."Well done Pluralsight and Critical Path!

    Read the article

  • systemstate dump ??

    - by JaneZhang(???)
            ???????????????hang????,????????systemstate dump?????????,?????,????????,???????????????,????systemstate dump?????????????       ??????,????????systemstate dump, ?????“WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK”?        systemstate dump???????????,??????:??????,???????,????dump????????,???????M????)1. ?sysdba???????:$sqlplus / as sysdba??$sqlplus -prelim / as sysdba <==??????????hang?????SQL>oradebug setmypidSQL>oradebug unlimit;SQL>oradebug dump systemstate 266;?1~2??SQL>oradebug dump systemstate 266;?1~2??SQL>oradebug dump systemstate 266;SQL>oradebug tracefile_name;==>????????2. ????systemstate dump,??????hang analyze??????????????????$sqlplus / as sysdba??$sqlplus -prelim / as sysdba <==??????????hang?????SQL>oradebug setmypidSQL>oradebug unlimit;SQL>oradebug dump hanganalyze 3?1~2??SQL>oradebug dump hanganalyze 3?1~2??SQL>oradebug dump hanganalyze 3SQL>oradebug tracefile_name;==>??????????RAC???,????????????systemstate dump,???????????(?????????):$sqlplus / as sysdba??$sqlplus -prelim / as sysdba <==??????????hang?????SQL>oradebug setmypidSQL>oradebug unlimitSQL>oradebug -g all dump systemstate 266  <==-g all ??????????dump?1~2??SQL>oradebug -g all dump systemstate 266?1~2??SQL>oradebug -g all dump systemstate 266?RAC???hang analyze:SQL>oradebug setmypidSQL>oradebug unlimitSQL>oradebug -g all hanganalyze 3?1~2??SQL>oradebug -g all hanganalyze 3?1~2??SQL>oradebug -g all hanganalyze 3?????????????????systemstate dump,?????????????backgroud_dump_dest??diag trace???????????????????????????,?????hang?,?????systemstate dump?????:10:   dump11:   dump + global cache of RAC256: short stack (????)258: dump(???lock element) + short stack (????)266: 256+10 -->short stack+ dump267: 256+11 -->short stack+ dump + global cache of RAClevel 11? 267? dump global cache, ??????trace ??,??????????????,????????,???266,??????dump?????????,????????????????????short stack????,???????,??2000???,??????30??????????,????level 10 ?? level 258, level 258 ? level 10????short short stack, ??level 10?????lock element data.?????systemstate dump???,??????level?????:??????37???:-rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall    72721 Aug 31 21:50 rac10g2_ora_31092.trc==>256 (short stack, ????2K)-rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall  2724863 Aug 31 21:52 rac10g2_ora_31654.trc==>10    (dump,????72K )-rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall  2731935 Aug 31 21:53 rac10g2_ora_32214.trc==>266 (dump + short stack ,????72K)RAC:-rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 55873057 Aug 31 21:49 rac10g2_ora_30658.trc ==>11   (dump+global cache,????1.4M)-rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 55879249 Aug 31 21:48 rac10g2_ora_28615.trc ==>267 (dump+global cache+short stack,????1.4M) ??,??????dump global cache(level 11?267,???????????????)??????????,?????????systemstate dump ??

    Read the article

  • In addition to Google's First Flick Free, should you whitelist search engine bots past a paywall?

    - by tobek
    Our site has subscription-only pages - non-subscribed visitors see a snippet preview. As per Google's FCF requirements, your first 5 hits to a subscriber-only pages with .google. as the referrer, you see the full page. In addition to this, should we whitelist search engine bots so that they can index the full content? I assume this is not required for Google, which can use FCF to index our content, but what about other search engines? Is this considered cloaking? My gut says that whitelisting bots past the paywall is bad practice., but I wanted to confirm - any evidence or references would be amazing.

    Read the article

  • GPL exception that allows linking to free licenses only?

    - by fNek
    There is the GPL license and the linking exception which allows closed-source programs to use the program as a library. There is also the slightly more restrictive LGPL (more restrictive than GPL with exception since it requires that the user can change the library in the resulting project, etc.). And there is the Cygwin exception that allows linking to open source programs. I see clear advantages: Open-Source programs may use the library. People may use these programs for closed-source programs, but then they lose the permission to use the (GPL) library. However, there are two things I don't like about the Cygwin exception: - Its legal status is disputed - I keep hearing that it is basically worthless - It requires certification by the OSI, I would rather have certification by FSF Is there an exception to the GNU General Public License that meets my requirements?

    Read the article

  • In addition to Google's First Click Free, should you whitelist search engine bots past a paywall?

    - by tobek
    Our site has subscription-only pages - non-subscribed visitors see a snippet preview. As per Google's FCF requirements, your first 5 hits to a subscriber-only pages with .google. as the referrer, you see the full page. In addition to this, should we whitelist search engine bots so that they can index the full content? I assume this is not required for Google, which can use FCF to index our content, but what about other search engines? Is this considered cloaking? My gut says that whitelisting bots past the paywall is bad practice., but I wanted to confirm - any evidence or references would be amazing.

    Read the article

  • SPARC T4 ?????????

    - by user12798668
    ????????????????????????????????????????????????????? SPARC T4 ????????????????????????????T4 ??????? SP(Service Processor) ??? ILOM ?? - set /SP/powermgmt policy=elastic ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ILOM ? /SYS/VSP/history/0 ???????????????????????????? SPARC T4-1 ? OS ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?? ?? = ?????(W)?????????????? Mar 26 12:04:54 = 294 Mar 26 12:03:53 = 292 Mar 26 12:02:53 = 292 Mar 26 12:01:53 = 293 Mar 26 12:00:53 = 292 Mar 26 11:59:53 = 293 Mar 26 11:58:54 = 293 Mar 26 11:57:54 = 294 Mar 26 11:56:54 = 293 Mar 26 11:55:54 = 348 ????????????????????? 90W ?????????! ?? psrinfo ????????????????... # psrinfo 0 on-line since 03/23/2012 17:39:28 1 on-line since 03/26/2012 20:53:56 ?? SPARC T4-1 ????????8 ????????? 8 CPU ??????? SPARC T4 CPU ? 1 ??????????????psrinfo ??????? 64 CPU ??? OS ?????????????????????? 2 CPU ??????????! ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????CPU ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 2 CPU ?????????????????????????????????? CPU ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????? SPARC T4 ????????????? Oracle VM Server for SPARC (OVM for SPARC) ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? Oracle VM Server for SPARC ???????????? ?10? ??????? - ??????? ??????????????????????????OTN ? How to Use the Power Management Controls on SPARC Servers ?????????????????????????????? ??????????????SPARC T4 ?????????????????? Oracle OpenWorld Tokyo 2012 ???????????????????? ?????????????????????????·????????????????????! 4/4(?) ???? K1-01?ENGINEERED FOR INNOVATION ???????????????(9:00-11:15) 4/5(?) ????????? G2-01 ???????&???????????IT???????????(11:50 - 13:20) ???????????!! Oracle OpenWorld Tokyo 2012 ???? URL http://www.oracle.com/openworld/jp-ja/index.html ?????? 7264 ???????????????

    Read the article

  • Did You Know You Can Learn SEO For Free?

    SEO information is all over the internet. Spend some time looking, and take notes. Not all the sites are telling you the correct information, and not all the sites are going to help you learn how to SEO your own website.

    Read the article

  • System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException (0x80070008): Not enough storage is available to process

    - by Darryl Braaten
    I am trying to diagnose this exception. "System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException (0x80070008): Not enough storage is available to process this command. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070008) at System.Runtime.Remoting.RemotingServices.AllocateUninitializedObject(RuntimeType objectType) at System.Runtime.Remoting.RemotingServices.AllocateUninitializedObject(Type objectType) at System.Runtime.Remoting.Activation.ActivationServices.CreateInstance(Type serverType) at System.Runtime.Remoting.Activation.ActivationServices.IsCurrentContextOK(Type serverType, Object[] props, Boolean bNewObj) at Oracle.DataAccess.Client.CThreadPool..ctor() at Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleCommand.set_CommandTimeout(Int32 value) ... It does not look like any of the normal types of "storage" have hit any limits. The application is using about 400MB of memory, 70 threads, 2000 handles and the hard drive has many GB free. The machine is running Windows 2003 Enterprise server with 16GB of RAM so memory shouldn't be an issue. The application is running as a windows service so there are no GDI objects being used. Running out of GDI handles is a common cause of this exception. Database connections, commands & readers are all all wrapped with using blocks so they should be getting cleaned up correctly.

    Read the article

  • How to reclaim storage for deleted LOBs

    - by Jim Hudson
    I have a LOB tablespace. Currently holding 9GB out of 12GB available. And, as far as I can tell, deleting records doesn't reclaim any storage in the tablespace. I'm getting worried about handling further processing. This is Oracle 11.1 and the data are in a CLOB and a BLOB column in the same table. The LOB Index segments (SYS_IL...) are small, all the storage is in the data segments (SYS_LOB...) We'e tried purge and coalesce and didn't get anywhere -- same number of bytes in user_extents. "Alter table xxx move" will work, but we'd need to have someplace to move it to that has enough space for the revised data. We'd also need to do that off hours and rebuild the indexes, of course, but that's easy enough. Copying out the good data and doing a truncate, then copying it back, will also work. But that's pretty much just what the "alter table" command does. Am I missing some easy ways to shrink things down and get the storage back? Or is "alter table xxx move" the best approach? Or is this a non-issue and Oracle will grab back the space from the deleted lob rows when it needs it?

    Read the article

  • Why is OracleDataAdapter.Fill() Very Slow?

    - by John Gietzen
    I am using a pretty complex query to retrieve some data out of one of our billing databases. I'm running in to an issue where the query seems to complete fairly quickly when executed with SQL Developer, but does not seem to ever finish when using the OracleDataAdapter.Fill() method. I'm only trying to read about 1000 rows, and the query completes in SQL Developer in about 20 seconds. What could be causing such drastic differences in performance? I have tons of other queries that run quickly using the same function. Here is the code I'm using to execute the query: using Oracle.DataAccess.Client; ... public DataTable ExecuteExternalQuery(string connectionString, string providerName, string queryText) { DbConnection connection = null; DbCommand selectCommand = null; DbDataAdapter adapter = null; switch (providerName) { case "System.Data.OracleClient": case "Oracle.DataAccess.Client": connection = new OracleConnection(connectionString); selectCommand = connection.CreateCommand(); adapter = new OracleDataAdapter((OracleCommand)selectCommand); break; ... } DataTable table = null; try { connection.Open(); selectCommand.CommandText = queryText; selectCommand.CommandTimeout = 300000; selectCommand.CommandType = CommandType.Text; table = new DataTable("result"); table.Locale = CultureInfo.CurrentCulture; adapter.Fill(table); } finally { adapter.Dispose(); if (connection.State != ConnectionState.Closed) { connection.Close(); } } return table; } And here is the general outline of the SQL I'm using: with trouble_calls as ( select work_order_number, account_number, date_entered from work_orders where date_entered >= sysdate - (15 + 31) -- Use the index to limit the number of rows scanned and wo_status not in ('Cancelled') and wo_type = 'Trouble Call' ) select account_number, work_order_number, date_entered from trouble_calls wo where wo.icoms_date >= sysdate - 15 and ( select count(*) from trouble_calls repeat where wo.account_number = repeat.account_number and wo.work_order_number <> repeat.work_order_number and wo.date_entered - repeat.date_entered between 0 and 30 ) >= 1

    Read the article

  • no statement parsed and wrong number or types of arguments - cfstoredproc

    - by Travis
    I have an Oracle procedure - editBacklog which I'm calling from a CFM page via cfstoredproc. After several changes to the procedure I started getting ORA-06550: line 1, column 7: PLS-00306: wrong number or types of arguments in call to 'EDITBACKLOG'. I've gotten this before and found that if I changed the name of the procedure it starts working again. I changed the name to editBacklog2 and it worked as I expected it to. I changed the name back to editBacklog and got the same error. I changed the name back to editBacklog2 again and started getting ORA-01003: no statement parsed. NOTHING has changed at this point except for the names. I changed the name yet again to editBacklog3 and it works as expected. As of right now editBacklog = ORA-06550 editBacklog2 = ORA-01003 editBacklog3 = works (kinda) This whole thing started when I was trying to fix an ORA-01821: date format not recognized error. I fear when I start changing things I'll start getting the same lame behavior described above. Either Oracle or CF is messing with me and I'll end up liking one of them less because of it. I assume it's probably cfstoredproc caching metadata or something but neither google, livedocs, or OTN have much to say about my situation. I'm not the SA or DBA. Anyone have any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Automatic Adjusting Range Table

    - by Bradford
    I have a table with a start date range, an end date range, and a few other additional columns. On input of a new record, I want to automatically adjust any overlapping date ranges (shrinking them to allow for the new input). I also want to ensure that no overlapping records can accidentally be inserted into this table. I'm using Oracle and Java for my application code. How should I enforce the prevention of overlapping date ranges and also allow for automatically adjusting overlapping ranges? Should I create an AFTER INSERT trigger, with a dbms_lock to serialize access, to prevent the overlapping data. Then in Java, apply the logic to auto adjust everything? Or should that part be in PL/SQL in stored procedure call? This is something that we need for a couple other tables so it'd be nice to abstract. If anyone has something like this already written, please share :) I did find this reference: http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:474221407101 Here's an example of how each of the 4 overlapping cases should be handled for adjustment on insert: = Example 1 = In DB (Start, End, Value): (0, 10, 'X') **(30, 100, 'Z') (200, 500, 'Y') Input (20, 50, 'A') Gives (0, 10, 'X') **(20, 50, 'A') **(51, 100, 'Z') (200, 500, 'Y') = Example 2 = In DB (Start, End, Value): (0, 10, 'X') **(30, 100, 'Z') (200, 500, 'Y') Input (40, 80, 'A') Gives (0, 10, 'X') **(30, 39, 'Z') **(40, 80, 'A') **(81, 100, 'Z') (200, 500, 'Y') = Example 3 = In DB (Start, End, Value): (0, 10, 'X') **(30, 100, 'Z') (200, 500, 'Y') Input (50, 120, 'A') Gives (0, 10, 'X') **(30, 49, 'Z') **(50, 120, 'A') (200, 500, 'Y') = Example 4 = In DB (Start, End, Value): (0, 10, 'X') **(30, 100, 'Z') (200, 500, 'Y') Input (20, 120, 'A') Gives (0, 10, 'X') **(20, 120, 'A') (200, 500, 'Y') The algorithm is as follows: given range = g; input range = i; output range set = o if i.start <= g.start if i.end >= g.end o_1 = i else o_1 = i o_2 = (o.end + 1, g.end) else if i.end >= g.end o_1 = (g.start, i.start - 1) o_2 = i else o_1 = (g.start, i.start - 1) o_2 = i o_3 = (i.end + 1, i.end)

    Read the article

  • SQLDeveloper using over 100MB of PGA

    - by Leigh Riffel
    Perhaps this is normal, but in my Oracle 11g database I am seeing programmers using Oracle's SQL Developer regularly consume more than 100MB of combined UGA and PGA memory. I'd like to know if this is normal and what can be done about it. Our database is on the 32 bit version of Windows 2008, so memory limitations are becoming an increasing concern. I am using the following query to show the memory usage: SELECT e.SID, e.username, e.status, b.PGA_MEMORY FROM v$session e LEFT JOIN (select y.SID, y.value pga, TO_CHAR(ROUND(y.value/1024/1024),99999999) || ' MB' PGA_MEMORY from v$sesstat y, v$statname z where y.STATISTIC# = z.STATISTIC# and NAME = 'session pga memory') b ON e.sid=b.sid WHERE (PGA)/1024/1024 > 20 ORDER BY 4 DESC; It seems that the resource usage goes up any time a table is opened in SQLDeveloper, but even when it is closed the memory does not go away. The problem is worse if the table is sorted while it was open as that seems to use even more memory. I understand how this would use memory while it is sorting, and perhaps even while it is still open, but to use memory after it is closed seems wrong to me. Can anyone confirm this? Update: I discovered that my numbers were off due to not understanding that the UGA is stored in the PGA under dedicated server mode. This makes the numbers lower than they were, but the problem still remains that SQL Developer seems to use excessive PGA.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454  | Next Page >