Search Results

Search found 18079 results on 724 pages for 'compiler options'.

Page 46/724 | < Previous Page | 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53  | Next Page >

• VS 2008 C++ build output?

  - by STingRaySC

  Why when I watch the build output from a VC++ project in VS do I see: 1Compiling... 1a.cpp 1b.cpp 1c.cpp 1d.cpp 1e.cpp [etc...] 1Generating code... 1x.cpp 1y.cpp [etc...] The output looks as though several compilation units are being handled before any code is generated. Is this really going on? I'm trying to improve build times, and by using pre-compiled headers, I've gotten great speedups for each ".cpp" file, but there is a relatively long pause during the "Generating Code..." message. I do not have "Whole Program Optimization" nor "Link Time Code Generation" turned on. If this is the case, then why? Why doesn't VC++ compile each ".cpp" individually (which would include the code generation phase)? If this isn't just an illusion of the output, is there cross-compilation-unit optimization potentially going on here? There don't appear to be any compiler options to control that behavior (I know about WPO and LTCG, as mentioned above). EDIT: The build log just shows the ".obj" files in the output directory, one per line. There is no indication of "Compiling..." vs. "Generating code..." steps. EDIT: I have confirmed that this behavior has nothing to do with the "maximum number of parallel project builds" setting in Tools - Options - Projects and Solutions - Build and Run. Nor is it related to the MSBuild project build output verbosity setting. Indeed if I cancel the build before the "Generating code..." step, the ".obj" files will not exist for the most recent set of "compiled" files. E.g., if I cancel the build during "c.cpp" above, I will see only "a.obj" and "b.obj".

  Read the article

• Recompiling an old fortran 2/4\66 program that was compiled for os\2 need it to run in dos

  - by Mike Hansen

  I am helping an old scientist with some problems and have 1 program that he found and modified about 20 yrs. ago, and runs fine as a 32 bit os\2 executable but i need it to run under dos! I am not a programmer but a good hardware & software man, so I'am pretty stupid about this problem, but here go's I have downloaded 6 different compilers watcom77,silverfrost ftn95,gfortran,2 versions of g77 and f80. Watcom says it is to old of program,find older compiler,silverfrost opens it,debugs, etc. but is changing all the subroutines from "real" to "complex" and vice-vesa,and the g77's seem to install perfectly (library links and etc.) but wont even compile the test.f programs.My problem is 1; to recompile "as is" or "upgrade" the code? PROGRAM xconvlv INTEGER N,N2,M PARAMETER (N=2048,N2=2048,M=128) INTEGER i,isign REAL data(n),respns(m),resp(n),ans(n2),t3(n),DUMMY OPEN(UNIT=1, FILE='C:\QKBAS20\FDATA1.DAT') DO 1 i=1,N READ(1,*) T3(i), data(i), DUMMY continue CLOSE(UNIT-1) do 12 i=1,N respns(i)=data(i) resp(i)=respns(i) continue isign=-1 call convlv(data,N,resp,M,isign,ans) OPEN(UNIT=1,FILE='C:\QKBAS20\FDATA9.DAT') DO 14 i=1,N WRITE(1,*) T3(i), ans(i) continue END SUBROUTINE CONVLV(data,n,respns,m,isign,ans) INTEGER isign,m,n,NMAX REAL data(n),respns(n) COMPLEX ans(n) PARAMETER (NMAX=4096) * uses realft, twofft INTEGER i,no2 COMPLEX fft (NMAX) do 11 i=1, (m-1)/2 respns(n+1-i)=respns(m+1-i) continue do 12 i=(m+3)/2,n-(m-1)/2 respns(i)=0.0 continue call twofft (data,respns,fft,ans,n) no2=n/2 do 13 i=1,no2+1 if (isign.eq.1) then ans(i)=fft(i)*ans(i)/no2 else if (isign.eq.-1) then if (abs(ans(i)) .eq.0.0) pause ans(i)=fft(i)/ans(i)/no2 else pause 'no meaning for isign in convlv' endif continue ans(1)=cmplx(real (ans(1)),real (ans(no2+1))) call realft(ans,n,-1) return END SUBROUTINE realft(data,n,isign) INTEGER isign,n REAL data(n) * uses four1 INTEGER i,i1,i2,i3,i4,n2p3 REAL c1,c2,hli,hir,h2i,h2r,wis,wrs DOUBLE PRECISION theta,wi,wpi,wpr,wr,wtemp theta=3.141592653589793d0/dble(n/2) cl=0.5 if (isign.eq.1) then c2=-0.5 call four1(data,n/2,+1) else c2=0.5 theta=-theta endif (etc.,etc., etc.) SUBROUTINE twofft(data,data2,fft1,fft2,n) INTEGER n REAL data1(n,data2(n) COMPLEX fft1(n), fft2(n) * uses four1 INTEGER j,n2 COMPLEX h1,h2,c1,c2 c1=cmplx(0.5,0.0) c2=cmplx(0.0,-0.5) do 11 j=1,n fft1(j)=cmplx(data1(j),data2(j) continue call four1 (fft1,n,1) fft2(1)=cmplx(aimag(fft1(1)),0.0) fft1(1)=cmplx(real(fft1(1)),0.0) n2=n+2 do 12 j=2,n/2+1 h1=c1*(fft1(j)+conjg(fft1(n2-j))) h2=c2*(fft1(j)-conjg(fft1(n2-j))) fft1(j)=h1 fft1(n2-j)=conjg(h1) fft2(j)=h2 fft2(n2-j)=conjg(h2) continue return END SUBROUTINE four1(data,nn,isign) INTEGER isign,nn REAL data(2*nn) INTEGER i,istep,j,m,mmax,n REAL tempi,tempr DOUBLE PRECISION theta, wi,wpi,wpr,wr,wtemp n=2*nn j=1 do 11 i=1,n,2 if(j.gt.i)then tempr=data(j) tempi=data(j+1) (etc.,etc.,etc.,) continue mmax=istep goto 2 endif return END There are 4 subroutines with this that are about 3 pages of code and whould be much easier to e-mail to someone if their able to help me with this.My e-mail is [email protected] , or if someone could tell me where to get a "working" compiler that could recompile this? THANK-YOU, THANK-YOU,and THANK-YOU for any help with this! The errors Iam getting are; 1.In a call to CONVLV from another procedure,the first argument was of a type REAL(kind=1), it is now a COMPLEX(kind=1) 2.In a call to REALFT from another procedure, ... COMPLEX(kind=1) it is now a REAL(kind=1) 3.In a call to TWOFFT from...COMPLEX(kind-1) it is now a REAL(kind=1) 4.In a previous call to FOUR1, the first argument was of a type REAL(kind=1) it is now a COMPLEX(kind=1).

  Read the article

• Improvements to Joshua Bloch's Builder Design Pattern?

  - by Jason Fotinatos

  Back in 2007, I read an article about Joshua Blochs take on the "builder pattern" and how it could be modified to improve the overuse of constructors and setters, especially when an object has a large number of properties, most of which are optional. A brief summary of this design pattern is articled here [http://rwhansen.blogspot.com/2007/07/theres-builder-pattern-that-joshua.html]. I liked the idea, and have been using it since. The problem with it, while it is very clean and nice to use from the client perspective, implementing it can be a pain in the bum! There are so many different places in the object where a single property is reference, and thus creating the object, and adding a new property takes a lot of time. So...I had an idea. First, an example object in Joshua Bloch's style: Josh Bloch Style: public class OptionsJoshBlochStyle { private final String option1; private final int option2; // ...other options here <<<< public String getOption1() { return option1; } public int getOption2() { return option2; } public static class Builder { private String option1; private int option2; // other options here <<<<< public Builder option1(String option1) { this.option1 = option1; return this; } public Builder option2(int option2) { this.option2 = option2; return this; } public OptionsJoshBlochStyle build() { return new OptionsJoshBlochStyle(this); } } private OptionsJoshBlochStyle(Builder builder) { this.option1 = builder.option1; this.option2 = builder.option2; // other options here <<<<<< } public static void main(String[] args) { OptionsJoshBlochStyle optionsVariation1 = new OptionsJoshBlochStyle.Builder().option1("firefox").option2(1).build(); OptionsJoshBlochStyle optionsVariation2 = new OptionsJoshBlochStyle.Builder().option1("chrome").option2(2).build(); } } Now my "improved" version: public class Options { // note that these are not final private String option1; private int option2; // ...other options here public String getOption1() { return option1; } public int getOption2() { return option2; } public static class Builder { private final Options options = new Options(); public Builder option1(String option1) { this.options.option1 = option1; return this; } public Builder option2(int option2) { this.options.option2 = option2; return this; } public Options build() { return options; } } private Options() { } public static void main(String[] args) { Options optionsVariation1 = new Options.Builder().option1("firefox").option2(1).build(); Options optionsVariation2 = new Options.Builder().option1("chrome").option2(2).build(); } } As you can see in my "improved version", there are 2 less places in which we need to add code about any addition properties (or options, in this case)! The only negative that I can see is that the instance variables of the outer class are not able to be final. But, the class is still immutable without this. Is there really any downside to this improvement in maintainability? There has to be a reason which he repeated the properties within the nested class that I'm not seeing?

  Read the article

• I got my z-5 Logitech speakers to work, but whenever I restart, I have to reconfigure them

  - by The Bill

  This is the content of my alsa-base.conf file (for some reason, the entries preceded by # are bolded--anyway): autoloader aliases install sound-slot-0 /sbin/modprobe snd-card-0 install sound-slot-1 /sbin/modprobe snd-card-1 install sound-slot-2 /sbin/modprobe snd-card-2 install sound-slot-3 /sbin/modprobe snd-card-3 install sound-slot-4 /sbin/modprobe snd-card-4 install sound-slot-5 /sbin/modprobe snd-card-5 install sound-slot-6 /sbin/modprobe snd-card-6 install sound-slot-7 /sbin/modprobe snd-card-7 Cause optional modules to be loaded above generic modules install snd /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install snd $CMDLINE_OPTS && { /sbin/modprobe --quiet --use-blacklist snd-ioctl32 ; /sbin/modprobe --quiet --use-blacklist snd-seq ; } # Workaround at bug #499695 (reverted in Ubuntu see LP #319505) install snd-pcm /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install snd-pcm $CMDLINE_OPTS && { /sbin/modprobe --quiet --use-blacklist snd-pcm-oss ; : ; } install snd-mixer /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install snd-mixer $CMDLINE_OPTS && { /sbin/modprobe --quiet --use-blacklist snd-mixer-oss ; : ; } install snd-seq /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install snd-seq $CMDLINE_OPTS && { /sbin/modprobe --quiet --use-blacklist snd-seq-midi ; /sbin/modprobe --quiet --use-blacklist snd-seq-oss ; : ; } # install snd-rawmidi /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install snd-rawmidi $CMDLINE_OPTS && { /sbin/modprobe --quiet --use-blacklist snd-seq-midi ; : ; } Cause optional modules to be loaded above sound card driver modules install snd-emu10k1 /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install snd-emu10k1 $CMDLINE_OPTS && { /sbin/modprobe --quiet --use-blacklist snd-emu10k1-synth ; } install snd-via82xx /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install snd-via82xx $CMDLINE_OPTS && { /sbin/modprobe --quiet --use-blacklist snd-seq ; } Load saa7134-alsa instead of saa7134 (which gets dragged in by it anyway) install saa7134 /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install saa7134 $CMDLINE_OPTS && { /sbin/modprobe --quiet --use-blacklist saa7134-alsa ; : ; } Prevent abnormal drivers from grabbing index 0 options bt87x index=-2 options cx88_alsa index=-2 options saa7134-alsa index=-2 options snd-atiixp-modem index=-2 options snd-intel8x0m index=-2 options snd-via82xx-modem index=-2 options snd-usb-audio index=-2 options snd-usb-caiaq index=-2 options snd-usb-ua101 index=-2 options snd-usb-us122l index=-2 options snd-usb-usx2y index=-2 alias snd-card-0 snd-usb-audio alias snd-card-1 snd-hda-intel options snd-usb-audio index=0 options snd-hda-intel index=1 Ubuntu #62691, enable MPU for snd-cmipci options snd-cmipci mpu_port=0x330 fm_port=0x388 Keep snd-pcsp from being loaded as first soundcard options snd-pcsp index=-2 options snd-usb-audio index=-2 options snd-usb-audio index=0 alias snd-card-0 snd-usb-audio alias snd-card-1 snd-hda-intel options snd-hda-intel index=1 I deleted a line that said something like "#Keep usb-audio from being loaded as first soundcard" and that made the speakers work for the first time (before this, they never showed up). I also added the last four lines. Anyway, what can I add to this so that I don't have to reconfigure them each time I restart? Currently, I have to open Sound Settings, then under the hardware tab, select Analog Stereo Output, and then unplug my USB speakers and plug them back in. This makes them pop up so that I can see them. Otherwise, it will not show my Z-5 speakers as a device that can be configured.

  Read the article

• NFS issue: clients can mount shares as NFSv3 but not as NFSv4 -- or how to debug NFS?

  - by tdn

  Problem description I have a file server running Debian. On it I have a few NFS shares. When I mount the shares from a client using NFSv3 (mount.nfs 10.0.0.51:/exports/video /mnt -o vers=3,soft,intr,timeo=10), it works. However, I would like to use NFSv4 because of improved security and performance. When I try to mount an NFSv4 share on malbec the mount command just hangs and finally times out after 2 minutes. How do I make the clients mount the NFSv4 shares as NFSv4? How do I troubleshoot NFS? There is no information in the syslog on neither client nor server. What are any errors in my configuration? Facts: Server is corvina(10.0.0.51) Client is malbec(10.0.0.1) Malbec runs Ubuntu 12.04 Server runs Debian 7 wheezy Both are connected through 1 GbE LAN. Firewalls are off. rpcinfo (root@malbec) (13-07-02 21:00) (P:0 L:1) [0] ~ # rpcinfo -p program vers proto port service 100000 4 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 3 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 4 udp 111 portmapper 100000 3 udp 111 portmapper 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper 100024 1 udp 4000 status 100024 1 tcp 4000 status (root@malbec) (13-07-02 21:00) (P:0 L:1) [0] ~ # rpcinfo -p corvina program vers proto port service 100000 4 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 3 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 4 udp 111 portmapper 100000 3 udp 111 portmapper 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper 100024 1 udp 4000 status 100024 1 tcp 4000 status 100003 3 udp 2049 nfs 100227 3 udp 2049 100021 1 udp 4003 nlockmgr 100021 3 udp 4003 nlockmgr 100021 4 udp 4003 nlockmgr 100021 1 tcp 4003 nlockmgr 100021 3 tcp 4003 nlockmgr 100021 4 tcp 4003 nlockmgr 100005 1 udp 4002 mountd 100005 1 tcp 4002 mountd 100005 2 udp 4002 mountd 100005 2 tcp 4002 mountd 100005 3 udp 4002 mountd 100005 3 tcp 4002 mountd tcpdump The following is output from tcpdump on malbec while running this command: # rpcinfo -p corvina ~ # tcpdump -i eth0 host 10.0.0.51 21:14:51.762083 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.948 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.sunrpc: Flags [S], seq 3069120722, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 146111 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:14:51.762431 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.sunrpc > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.948: Flags [S.], seq 770684199, ack 3069120723, win 14480, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 398850 ecr 146111,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:14:51.762458 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.948 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.sunrpc: Flags [.], ack 1, win 115, options [nop,nop,TS val 146111 ecr 398850], length 0 21:14:51.762556 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.948 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.sunrpc: Flags [P.], seq 1:45, ack 1, win 115, options [nop,nop,TS val 146111 ecr 398850], length 44 21:14:51.762710 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.sunrpc > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.948: Flags [.], ack 45, win 114, options [nop,nop,TS val 398850 ecr 146111], length 0 21:14:51.763282 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.sunrpc > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.948: Flags [P.], seq 1:473, ack 45, win 114, options [nop,nop,TS val 398850 ecr 146111], length 472 21:14:51.763302 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.948 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.sunrpc: Flags [.], ack 473, win 123, options [nop,nop,TS val 146111 ecr 398850], length 0 21:14:51.764059 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.948 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.sunrpc: Flags [F.], seq 45, ack 473, win 123, options [nop,nop,TS val 146111 ecr 398850], length 0 21:14:51.764454 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.sunrpc > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.948: Flags [F.], seq 473, ack 46, win 114, options [nop,nop,TS val 398850 ecr 146111], length 0 21:14:51.764478 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.948 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.sunrpc: Flags [.], ack 474, win 123, options [nop,nop,TS val 146111 ecr 398850], length 0 The following is output from tcpdump on malbec while runing this command: ~ # time mount.nfs4 10.0.0.51:/ /mnt -o soft,intr,timeo=10 21:14:58.397327 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.872 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 1298959870, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 147769 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:14:58.397655 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.872: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 1298959871, win 0, length 0 21:14:59.470270 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.854 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 4111013041, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 148038 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:14:59.470569 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.854: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 4111013042, win 0, length 0 21:15:01.506179 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.988 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 1642454567, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 148547 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:15:01.506514 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.988: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 1642454568, win 0, length 0 21:15:05.542216 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.882 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 3844460520, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 149556 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:15:05.542484 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.882: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 3844460521, win 0, length 0 21:15:13.602228 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.969 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 1317773588, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 151571 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:15:13.602527 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.969: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 1317773589, win 0, length 0 21:15:18.615027 ARP, Request who-has malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org tell corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org, length 46 21:15:18.615048 ARP, Reply malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org is-at cc:52:af:46:af:23 (oui Unknown), length 28 21:15:23.622223 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.1003 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 2896563167, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 154076 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:15:23.622557 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.1003: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 2896563168, win 0, length 0 21:15:28.629913 ARP, Request who-has corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org tell malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org, length 28 21:15:28.630223 ARP, Reply corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org is-at 00:9c:02:ab:db:54 (oui Unknown), length 46 21:15:33.662200 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.727 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 1334644196, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 156586 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:15:33.663657 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.727: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 1334644197, win 0, length 0 21:15:43.698207 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.rsync > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 688828331, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 159095 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:15:43.698541 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.rsync: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 688828332, win 0, length 0 21:15:48.707710 ARP, Request who-has malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org tell corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org, length 46 21:15:48.707726 ARP, Reply malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org is-at cc:52:af:46:af:23 (oui Unknown), length 28 21:15:53.738188 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.946 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 2021272456, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 161605 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:15:53.738519 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.946: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 2021272457, win 0, length 0 21:16:03.806216 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.902 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 3889059201, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 164122 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:16:03.806546 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.902: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 3889059202, win 0, length 0 21:16:08.821900 ARP, Request who-has corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org tell malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org, length 28 21:16:08.822172 ARP, Reply corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org is-at 00:9c:02:ab:db:54 (oui Unknown), length 46 21:16:13.874209 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.712 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 1480927452, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 166639 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:16:13.874553 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.712: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 1961062188, win 0, length 0 21:16:18.880588 ARP, Request who-has malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org tell corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org, length 46 21:16:18.880605 ARP, Reply malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org is-at cc:52:af:46:af:23 (oui Unknown), length 28 21:16:23.910209 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.758 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 1375860626, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 169148 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:16:23.910532 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.758: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 1375860627, win 0, length 0 21:16:33.982258 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.694 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 1769203987, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 171666 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:16:33.982579 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.694: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 1769203988, win 0, length 0 21:16:44.026241 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.841 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 530553783, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 174177 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:16:44.026505 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.841: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 530553784, win 0, length 0 21:16:46.213388 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.43460 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.ssh: Flags [P.], seq 64:128, ack 33, win 325, options [nop,nop,TS val 174723 ecr 397437], length 64 21:16:46.213859 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.ssh > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.43460: Flags [P.], seq 33:65, ack 128, win 199, options [nop,nop,TS val 427466 ecr 174723], length 32 21:16:46.213883 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.43460 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.ssh: Flags [.], ack 65, win 325, options [nop,nop,TS val 174723 ecr 427466], length 0 21:16:54.094242 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.kerberos-master > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 2673083337, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 176694 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:16:54.094568 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.kerberos-master: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 2673083338, win 0, length 0 21:17:04.134227 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.1019 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs: Flags [S], seq 2176607713, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 179204 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 21:17:04.134566 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.nfs > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.1019: Flags [R.], seq 0, ack 2176607714, win 0, length 0 21:18:46.314021 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.43460 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.ssh: Flags [P.], seq 128:192, ack 65, win 325, options [nop,nop,TS val 204749 ecr 427466], length 64 21:18:46.314462 IP corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.ssh > malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.43460: Flags [P.], seq 65:97, ack 192, win 199, options [nop,nop,TS val 457494 ecr 204749], length 32 21:18:46.314482 IP malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.43460 > corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org.ssh: Flags [.], ack 97, win 325, options [nop,nop,TS val 204749 ecr 457494], length 0 21:18:51.317908 ARP, Request who-has corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org tell malbec.vineyard.sikkerhed.org, length 28 21:18:51.318177 ARP, Reply corvina.vineyard.sikkerhed.org is-at 00:9c:02:ab:db:54 (oui Unknown), length 46 mount command outputs mount.nfs4: Connection timed out mount.nfs4 10.0.0.51:/ /mnt -o soft,intr,timeo=10 0,00s user 0,00s system 0% cpu 2:05,80 total Returncode is 32 Server configuration I have enabled idmapd by adding NEED_IDMAPD=yes in /etc/default/nfs-common. Bind mounts in /etc/fstab: # nfs-audio /data/audio /exports/audio none bind 0 0 # nfs-clear /data/clear /exports/clear none bind 0 0 # nfs-video /data/video /exports/video none bind 0 0 /etc/exports: /exports 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0(rw,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check,fsid=0,crossmnt) /exports/video 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0(rw,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check,crossmnt) Output from # ls -al /exports total 20 drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Jul 2 14:14 ./ drwxr-xr-x 28 root root 4096 Jul 2 13:46 ../ drwxr-xr-x 7 tdn audio 4096 Jun 7 11:30 audio/ drwxr-xr-x 11 root root 4096 Jun 29 12:07 clear/ drwxrwx--- 12 tdn video 4096 Jun 7 09:46 video/

  Read the article

• How to Increment Visual Studio build number using C++?

  - by Brock Woolf

  I have a Visual Studio 2008 project that produces a file called: "Game-Release.exe". This was configured under Project Properties - C/C++ - Linker - General: $(OutDir)\$(ProjectName)-Release.exe I would like to take this a bit further by have an incrementing build number so I would have something which says: Game-Release-Build-1002.exe The number on the end should be an incrementing integer. I will be storing the build exe's on subversion so I think i would find this useful (although not necessary). Perhaps there is a built in macro in Visual Studio that could handle this. Quite possibly I was thinking I could have a text file with the build number in it and have the compiler read, use and increment the number in the file each time the project is built. My goal is however to make the process as automated as possible. What is the best way to accomplish this? If you offer an opinion, please also provide the code we can all share. Thnx.

  Read the article

• Method signature Vs function prototype

  - by Maroloccio

  A formal definition of the two? Current Wiki articles denote their different contexts and applications, such as internal type signature "strings" in Java VMs (1) and C/C++ function prototypes informing compilers of upcoming method definitions (2) but... 1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_signature 2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_prototype ... where to look for a definition which clearly and formally distinguished one from the other? There is literature using the words prototype and signature almost interchangeably yet other uses appear strict and consistent, if language-specific. Background: I am writing documentation for a sample compiler written for a University project.

  Read the article

• Why not allow mutation of the this binding?

  - by gnucom

  Hi Everyone, I'm building a interpreter/compiler for a school project (well now its turning into a hobby project) and an instructor warned me not to allow mutation of the 'this' binding (he said it was gross and made a huge deal about it) but I never learned why this is so... dangerous or bad. I'm very curious about why this is so bad. I figured this sort of feature could be useful in some way or another. I'm wondering if anyone familiar with building languages can tell me what sort of problems mutation on the 'this' binding can cause, and if they know of any cool or useful tricks that one could do if it actually was allowed. Do any languages that you're aware of allow mutation of 'this'? Thanks,

  Read the article

• BlackBerry - Error preverifying class java during build

  - by Davide Vosti

  I'm trying do build and debug a small project for BlackBerry. During the build I'm getting this error Error preverifying class java ... I read on the net this error could be caused by referencing multiple projects but I tried to move every package in a single project but the error is still there. I tried with multiple JDE version (currently 4.7) and the Java compiler is set to 1.6. Eclipse version is 3.4.1 as recommended by RIM's documentations. Does someone have some clue?

  Read the article

• Visual Studio autoclean?

  - by kubal5003

  Hello, I have a solution with multiple projects - executable, library, and others(unimportant right now). Library contains EF entity classes and executable uses them. When I'm working on some code from the executable then every entity that I use is marked as an error and compiler says that I should check usings and references. Reference in the executable project is set to library project(not the dll itself). When I build the library project then everything gets back to normal, but when I start typing then it happens again. I could live with it, but intelli sense isn't working and that is quite a disadvantage. Any ideas?

  Read the article

• Compilier optimization of repeated accessor calls C#

  - by apocalypse9

  I've found recently that for some types of financial calculations that the following pattern is much easier to follow and test especially in situations where we may need to get numbers from various stages of the computation. public class nonsensical_calculator { ... double _rate; int _term; int _days; double monthlyRate { get { return _rate / 12; }} public double days { get { return (1 - i); }} double ar { get { return (1+ days) /(monthlyRate * days) double bleh { get { return Math.Pow(ar - days, _term) public double raar { get { return bleh * ar/2 * ar / days; }} .... } Obviously this often results in multiple calls to the same accessor within a given formula. I was curious as to whether or not the compiler is smart enough to optimize away these repeated calls with no intervening change in state, or whether this style is causing a decent performance hit. Further reading suggestions are always appreciated

  Read the article

• Can you exclude code automatically when using the publish feature in Visual Studio

  - by LarryDev

  Is their a way to exclude a block of code when you use the publish feature in visual studio. In other words say I had a log in button that did something like: // Start Exclude when publishing if (txtUserName.Text == "" && txtPassword.Password == "") { lp = new System.ServiceModel.DomainServices.Client.ApplicationServices.LoginParameters("UserName", "Password"); } else // Stop Exclude when publishing { lp = new System.ServiceModel.DomainServices.Client.ApplicationServices.LoginParameters(txtUserName.Text, txtPassword.Password); } This way when I am debugging I can just leave the username and password field blank and just click login and the application will log me on. But when the application is published the compiler woudl ignore that code and not compile it in to the application.

  Read the article

• Compiling a C program with a specific architecture

  - by Marplesoft

  I was recently fighting some problems trying to compile an open source library on my Mac that depended on another library and got some errors about incompatible library architectures. Can somebody explain the concept behind compiling a C program for a specific architecture? I have seen the -arch compiler flag before and have seen values passed to it such as ppc, i386 and x86_64 which I assume maps to the CPU "language", but my understanding stops there. If one program uses a particular architecture, do all libraries that it loads need to be on the same architecture as well? How can I tell what architecture a given program/process is running under?

  Read the article

• Why did this work? ( php dot notation )

  - by Daniel

  Hi, I was writing some php code after a long sint doing ruby and I accidently wrote this: [root@ip-10-160-47-98 test]# cat run.php <?php class MyTest { public function run() { var_dump(this.test); } } $object = new MyTest(); $object->run(); [root@ip-10-160-47-98 test]# php run.php string(8) "thistest" [root@ip-10-160-47-98 test]# Now, this.test should have been $this-test, but the compiler was actually happy to let this run. Does anyone know how (this.test) got converted into a string "thistest"? Compiled and run on php 5.3.2 amazon instance ami-e32273a6 (CentOS 5.4) -daniel

  Read the article

• MinGW - cross compile tool - latest version?

  - by Petike

  At the MinGW download page you can download the "Cross-Hosted MinGW Build Tool" which is a shell script to build the "MinGW cross-compiler" so that you will be able to compile your programs on "Linux" to the "Windows" target. I have downloaded that script, run it and answered the interactive questions the script has asked me. I had to dowload some files from which one has name "gcc-core". And the "latest" version of the "gcc-core source code" I have found on that page, was "gcc-core-3.4.5-20060117-2-src.tar.gz" - so that "3.4.5" version. But on "Ubuntu Linux" I can download the precompiled "mingw32" package which is of the version "4.2.1". How is it possible that the "Ubuntu package" version of MinGW is newer than the one from the MinGW "homepage"? So which is the latest version of the "MinGW cross compile tool"?

  Read the article

• IBM RAD With Java 1.5 wont compile code with generics

  - by Matt1776

  Hello I have some code that has generic references in it and my IBM RAD IDE will not compile the code, instead treating it as an error. I have checked the version of the JRE its pointing to across all the Enterprise Project's and it is 1.5 which I am told does support generics. Also I checked that all the libraries for WAS were pointing to the correct version and that the Compiler Compliance Level was set correctly (which it was at 5.0 and i changed it to 6.0 with no luck either) Does anyone have any suggestions as to anything else I can try? I have issues like this with RAD all the time and I dont know about anyone else but they took eclipse and made it complicated and dysfunctional.

  Read the article

• static arrays defined with unspecified size, empty brackets?

  - by ahmadabdolkader

  For the C++ code fragment below: class Foo { int a[]; // no error }; int a[]; // error: storage size of 'a' isn't known void bar() { int a[]; // error: storage size of 'a' isn't known } why isn't the member variable causing an error too? and what is the meaning of this member variable? I'm using gcc version 3.4.5 (mingw-vista special) through CodeBlocks 8.02. On Visual Studio Express 2008 - Microsoft(R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler 15.00.30729.01 for 80x86, I got the following messages: class Foo { int a[]; // warning C4200: nonstandard extension used : zero-sized array in struct/union - Cannot generate copy-ctor or copy-assignment operator when UDT contains a zero-sized array }; int a[]; void bar() { int a[]; // error C2133: 'a' : unknown size } Now, this needs some explaination too.

  Read the article

• Create My own language with "Functional Programming Language"

  - by esehara

  I prefer Haskell. I already know How to create my own language with Procedural Language (for example: C, Java, Python, etc). But, I know How to create my own language with Functional Language (for example Haskell, Clojure and Scala). I've already read: Internet Resources Write Yourself a Scheme in 48 Hours Real World Haskell - Chapter 16.Using Persec Writing A Lisp Interpreter In Haskell Parsec, a fast combinator parser Implementing functional languages: a tutorial Books Introduction Functional Programming Using Haskell 2nd Edition -- Haskell StackOverflow (but with procedural language) Learning to write a compiler create my own programming language Source Libraries and tools/HJS -- Haskell Are there any other good sources? I wants to get more links,or sources.

  Read the article

• What challenges are there in making an iPhone IDE for Windows/Linux?

  - by Moshe

  First of all, is this possible? If so: What challenges would I encounter in making an XCode imitation for iPhone/iPod development for Windows or Linux? I was thinking about using gcc as the actual compiler for the objecitve-c. Will that work? It doesn't need to compile to iPhone OS until it is to be tested on the device or submitted to the app store. Perhaps it will be easier to compile to the local OS format (Windows or Linux) until "prime-time".

  Read the article

• Two '==' equality operators in same 'if' condition are not working as intended.

  - by Manav MN

  I am trying to establish equality of three equal variables, but the following code is not printing the obvious true answer which it should print. Can someone explain, how the compiler is parsing the given if condition internally? #include<stdio.h> int main() { int i = 123, j = 123, k = 123; if ( i == j == k) printf("Equal\n"); else printf("NOT Equal\n"); return 0; } Output: manav@workstation:~$ gcc -Wall -pedantic calc.c calc.c: In function ‘main’: calc.c:5: warning: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of ‘==’ manav@workstation:~$ ./a.out NOT Equal manav@workstation:~$ EDIT: Going by the answers given below, is the following statement okay to check above equality? if ( (i==j) == (j==k))

  Read the article

• Help with writing a php code that repeats itself per array value

  - by Mohammad

  Hi I'm using Closure Compiler to compress and join a few JavaScript files the syntax is something like this; $c = new PhpClosure(); $c->add("JavaScriptA.js") ->add("JavaScriptB.js") ->write(); How could I make it systematically add more files from an array lets say for each array element in $file = array('JavaScriptA.js','JavaScriptB.js','JavaScriptC.js',..) it would execute the following code $c = new PhpClosure(); $c->add("JavaScriptA.js") ->add("JavaScriptB.js") ->add("JavaScriptC.js") ->add ... ->write(); Thank you so much in advance!

  Read the article

• Solutions for redundant server and client code?

  - by Fragsworth

  In our system, the code which exists on the client side (in Flash and Javascript) mirrors the code that exists on the server side (e.g. in Python or PHP), normally with respect to the models, the methods available for those models, and the unit tests written for them. This becomes a problem in systems where you want to minimize data transfer (e.g. multiplayer games). I do not want to write the same code and unit tests redundantly for both the client and server, but I don't know of any standard solutions to deal with this. Basically, I want a language/compiler which can produce models and methods for three main languages: Actionscript, Javascript, and any server language. Does something like this exist?

  Read the article

• Is this call to a function object inlined?

  - by dehmann

  In the following code, Foo::add calls a function via a function object: struct Plus { inline int operator()(int x, int y) const { return x + y; } }; template<class Fct> struct Foo { Fct fct; Foo(Fct f) : fct(f) {} inline int add(int x, int y) { return fct(x,y); // same efficiency adding directly? } }; Is this the same efficiency as calling x+y directly in Foo::add? In other words, does the compiler typically directly replace fct(x,y) with the actual call, inlining the code, when compiling with optimizations enabled?

  Read the article

• Where to learn about VS debugger 'magic names'

  - by Gael Fraiteur

  If you've ever used Reflector, you probably noticed that the C# compiler generates types, methods, fields, and local variables, that deserve 'special' display by the debugger. For instance, local variables beginning with 'CS$' are not displayed to the user. There are other special naming conventions for closure types of anonymous methods, backing fields of automatic properties, and so on. My question: where to learn about these naming conventions? Does anyone know about some documentation? My objective is to make PostSharp 2.0 use the same conventions. Thank you!

  Read the article

• Why a variable is seen in the loop and is not seen outside the loop?

  - by Roman

  I have the following code: String serviceType; ServiceBrowser tmpBrowser; for (String playerName: players) { serviceType = "_" + playerName + "._tcp"; tmpBrowser = BrowsersGenerator.getBrowser(serviceType); tmpBrowser.browse(); System.out.println(tmpBrowser.getStatus()); } System.out.println(tmpBrowser.getStatus()); The compiler complains about the last line. It writes "variable tmpBrowser might not been initialized". If I comment the last line the compile does not complain.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53  | Next Page >