Search Results

Search found 3399 results on 136 pages for 'rule'.

Page 46/136 | < Previous Page | 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53  | Next Page >

• apache fails to connect to tomcat (Worker config?)

  - by techventure

  I have a tomcat 6 with follwoing server.xml: <Connector port="8253" maxThreads="150" minSpareThreads="25" maxSpareThreads="75" enableLookups="false" redirectPort="8445" acceptCount="100" debug="0" connectionTimeout="20000" disableUploadTimeout="true" /> <Connector port="8014" protocol="AJP/1.3" redirectPort="8445" /> and in added worker.properties: # Set properties for worker4 (ajp13) worker.worker4.type=ajp13 worker.worker4.host=localhost worker.worker4.port=8014 and i put in httpd.conf: JkMount /myWebApp/* worker4 It is not working a as trying to navigate to www1.myCompany.com/myWebApp gives "Service Temporarily Unavailable". I checked in tomcat catalina.out and it says: INFO: JK: ajp13 listening on /0.0.0.0:8014 UPDATE: i put mod_jk log level to debug and below is the result: [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_set_time_fmt::jk_util.c (458): Pre-processed log time stamp format is '[%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] ' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_open::jk_uri_worker_map.c (770): rule map size is 8 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_add::jk_uri_worker_map.c (720): wildchar rule '/myWebApp/*=worker4' source 'JkMount' was added [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (171): uri map dump after map open: index=0 file='(null)' reject_unsafe=0 reload=60 modified=0 checked=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 0: size=0 nosize=0 capacity=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 1: size=8 nosize=0 capacity=8 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (186): NEXT (1) map #3: uri=/myWebApp/* worker=worker4 context=/myWebApp/* source=JkMount type=Wildchar len=6 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_set_time_fmt::jk_util.c (458): Pre-processed log time stamp format is '[%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] ' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] init_jk::mod_jk.c (3123): Setting default connection pool max size to 1 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.list' with value 'worker1,worker2,worker3,worker4' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.worker4.type' with value 'ajp13' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.worker4.host' with value 'localhost' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.worker4.port' with value '8014' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_resolve_references::jk_map.c (774): Checking for references with prefix worker. with wildcard (recursion 1) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_shm_calculate_size::jk_shm.c (132): shared memory will contain 4 ajp workers of size 256 and 0 lb workers of size 320 with 0 members of size 320+256 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [error] init_jk::mod_jk.c (3166): Initializing shm:/var/log/httpd/mod_jk.shm.9552 errno=13. Load balancing workers will not function properly. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'ServerRoot' -> '/etc/httpd' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.list' -> 'worker1,worker2,worker3,worker4' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker1.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker1.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker1.port' -> '8009' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker2.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker2.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker2.port' -> '8010' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker3.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker3.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker3.port' -> '8112' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker4.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker4.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker4.port' -> '8014' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] build_worker_map::jk_worker.c (242): creating worker worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] wc_create_worker::jk_worker.c (146): about to create instance worker4 of ajp13 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] wc_create_worker::jk_worker.c (159): about to validate and init worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_validate::jk_ajp_common.c (2512): worker worker4 contact is 'localhost:8014' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2699): setting endpoint options: [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2702): keepalive: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2706): socket timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2710): socket connect timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2714): buffer size: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2718): pool timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2722): ping timeout: 10000 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2726): connect timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2730): reply timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2734): prepost timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2738): recovery options: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2742): retries: 2 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2746): max packet size: 8192 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2750): retry interval: 100 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] ajp_create_endpoint_cache::jk_ajp_common.c (2562): setting connection pool size to 1 with min 1 and acquire timeout 200 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [info] init_jk::mod_jk.c (3183): mod_jk/1.2.28 initialized [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] wc_get_worker_for_name::jk_worker.c (116): found a worker worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] wc_get_name_for_type::jk_worker.c (293): Found worker type 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_ext::jk_uri_worker_map.c (512): Checking extension for worker 3: worker4 of type ajp13 (2) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (171): uri map dump after extension stripping: index=0 file='(null)' reject_unsafe=0 reload=60 modified=0 checked=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 0: size=0 nosize=0 capacity=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 1: size=8 nosize=0 capacity=8 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (186): NEXT (1) map #3: uri=/myWebApp/* worker=worker4 context=/myWebApp/* source=JkMount type=Wildchar len=6 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9552:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_switch::jk_uri_worker_map.c (482): Switching uri worker map from index 0 to index 1 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_set_time_fmt::jk_util.c (458): Pre-processed log time stamp format is '[%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] ' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_open::jk_uri_worker_map.c (770): rule map size is 8 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_add::jk_uri_worker_map.c (720): wildchar rule '/myWebApp/*=worker4' source 'JkMount' was added [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (171): uri map dump after map open: index=0 file='(null)' reject_unsafe=0 reload=60 modified=0 checked=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 0: size=0 nosize=0 capacity=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 1: size=8 nosize=0 capacity=8 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (186): NEXT (1) map #0: uri=/jsp-examples/* worker=worker1 context=/jsp-examples/* source=JkMount type=Wildchar len=15 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (186): NEXT (1) map #3: uri=/myWebApp/* worker=worker4 context=/myWebApp/* source=JkMount type=Wildchar len=6 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_set_time_fmt::jk_util.c (458): Pre-processed log time stamp format is '[%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] ' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] init_jk::mod_jk.c (3123): Setting default connection pool max size to 1 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.list' with value 'worker1,worker2,worker3,worker4' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.worker4.type' with value 'ajp13' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.worker4.host' with value 'localhost' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_read_property::jk_map.c (491): Adding property 'worker.worker4.port' with value '8014' to map. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_resolve_references::jk_map.c (774): Checking for references with prefix worker. with wildcard (recursion 1) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_shm_calculate_size::jk_shm.c (132): shared memory will contain 4 ajp workers of size 256 and 0 lb workers of size 320 with 0 members of size 320+256 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [error] init_jk::mod_jk.c (3166): Initializing shm:/var/log/httpd/mod_jk.shm.9553 errno=13. Load balancing workers will not function properly. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'ServerRoot' -> '/etc/httpd' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.list' -> 'worker1,worker2,worker3,worker4' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker1.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker1.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker1.port' -> '8009' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker2.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker2.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker2.port' -> '8010' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker3.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker3.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker3.port' -> '8112' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker4.type' -> 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker4.host' -> 'localhost' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] jk_map_dump::jk_map.c (589): Dump of map: 'worker.worker4.port' -> '8014' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] build_worker_map::jk_worker.c (242): creating worker worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] wc_create_worker::jk_worker.c (146): about to create instance worker4 of ajp13 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] wc_create_worker::jk_worker.c (159): about to validate and init worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_validate::jk_ajp_common.c (2512): worker worker4 contact is 'localhost:8014' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2699): setting endpoint options: [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2702): keepalive: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2706): socket timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2710): socket connect timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2714): buffer size: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2718): pool timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2722): ping timeout: 10000 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2726): connect timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2730): reply timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2734): prepost timeout: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2738): recovery options: 0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2742): retries: 2 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2746): max packet size: 8192 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_init::jk_ajp_common.c (2750): retry interval: 100 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] ajp_create_endpoint_cache::jk_ajp_common.c (2562): setting connection pool size to 1 with min 1 and acquire timeout 200 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [info] init_jk::mod_jk.c (3183): mod_jk/1.2.28 initialized [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] wc_get_worker_for_name::jk_worker.c (116): found a worker worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] wc_get_name_for_type::jk_worker.c (293): Found worker type 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_ext::jk_uri_worker_map.c (512): Checking extension for worker 3: worker4 of type ajp13 (2) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (171): uri map dump after extension stripping: index=0 file='(null)' reject_unsafe=0 reload=60 modified=0 checked=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 0: size=0 nosize=0 capacity=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (176): generation 1: size=8 nosize=0 capacity=8 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_dump::jk_uri_worker_map.c (186): NEXT (1) map #3: uri=/myWebApp/* worker=worker4 context=/myWebApp/* source=JkMount type=Wildchar len=6 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9553:3086317328] [debug] uri_worker_map_switch::jk_uri_worker_map.c (482): Switching uri worker map from index 0 to index 1 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9556:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9557:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9558:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9559:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9560:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9561:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9562:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9563:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9564:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9565:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9567:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9568:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9566:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9569:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:26 2012] [9570:3086317328] [debug] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (3068): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.28 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] map_uri_to_worker_ext::jk_uri_worker_map.c (1036): Attempting to map URI '/myWebApp/jsp/login.faces' from 8 maps [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] find_match::jk_uri_worker_map.c (850): Attempting to map context URI '/myWebApp/*=worker4' source 'JkMount' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] find_match::jk_uri_worker_map.c (863): Found a wildchar match '/myWebApp/*=worker4' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] jk_handler::mod_jk.c (2459): Into handler jakarta-servlet worker=worker4 r->proxyreq=0 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] wc_get_worker_for_name::jk_worker.c (116): found a worker worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] wc_maintain::jk_worker.c (339): Maintaining worker worker1 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] wc_maintain::jk_worker.c (339): Maintaining worker worker2 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] wc_maintain::jk_worker.c (339): Maintaining worker worker3 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] wc_maintain::jk_worker.c (339): Maintaining worker worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] wc_get_name_for_type::jk_worker.c (293): Found worker type 'ajp13' [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] init_ws_service::mod_jk.c (977): Service protocol=HTTP/1.1 method=GET ssl=false host=(null) addr=167.184.214.6 name=www1.myCompany.com.au port=80 auth=(null) user=(null) laddr=10.215.222.78 raddr=167.184.214.6 uri=/myWebApp/jsp/login.faces [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_get_endpoint::jk_ajp_common.c (2977): acquired connection pool slot=0 after 0 retries [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_marshal_into_msgb::jk_ajp_common.c (605): ajp marshaling done [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (2283): processing worker4 with 2 retries [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1501): (worker4) all endpoints are disconnected. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (452): socket TCP_NODELAY set to On [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (576): trying to connect socket 18 to 127.0.0.1:8014 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [info] jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (594): connect to 127.0.0.1:8014 failed (errno=13) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [info] ajp_connect_to_endpoint::jk_ajp_common.c (922): Failed opening socket to (127.0.0.1:8014) (errno=13) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [error] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1507): (worker4) connecting to backend failed. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port (errno=13) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [info] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (2447): (worker4) sending request to tomcat failed (recoverable), because of error during request sending (attempt=1) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (2304): retry 1, sleeping for 100 ms before retrying [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1501): (worker4) all endpoints are disconnected. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (452): socket TCP_NODELAY set to On [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (576): trying to connect socket 18 to 127.0.0.1:8014 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [info] jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (594): connect to 127.0.0.1:8014 failed (errno=13) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [info] ajp_connect_to_endpoint::jk_ajp_common.c (922): Failed opening socket to (127.0.0.1:8014) (errno=13) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [error] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1507): (worker4) connecting to backend failed. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port (errno=13) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [info] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (2447): (worker4) sending request to tomcat failed (recoverable), because of error during request sending (attempt=2) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [error] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (2466): (worker4) connecting to tomcat failed. [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_reset_endpoint::jk_ajp_common.c (743): (worker4) resetting endpoint with sd = 4294967295 (socket shutdown) [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [debug] ajp_done::jk_ajp_common.c (2905): recycling connection pool slot=0 for worker worker4 [Wed Jun 13 18:44:54 2012] [9555:3086317328] [info] jk_handler::mod_jk.c (2615): Service error=-3 for worker=worker4 The error i get in browser is: Service Temporarily Unavailable Apache/2.2.3 (Red Hat) Server at www1.myCompany.com.au Port 80 can someone please help and explain what is going on and how it can be resolved?

  Read the article

• Employee Info Starter Kit: Project Mission

  - by Mohammad Ashraful Alam

  Employee Info Starter Kit is an open source ASP.NET project template that is intended to address different types of real world challenges faced by web application developers when performing common CRUD operations. Using a single database table ‘Employee’, it illustrates how to utilize Microsoft ASP.NET 4.0, Entity Framework 4.0 and Visual Studio 2010 effectively in that context. Employee Info Starter Kit is highly influenced by the concept ‘Pareto Principle’ or 80-20 rule. where it is targeted to enable a web developer to gain 80% productivity with 20% of effort with respect to learning curve and production. User Stories The user end functionalities of this starter kit are pretty simple and straight forward that are focused in to perform CRUD operation on employee records as described below. Creating a new employee record Read existing employee record Update an existing employee record Delete existing employee records Key Technology Areas ASP.NET 4.0 Entity Framework 4.0 T-4 Template Visual Studio 2010 Architectural Objective There is no universal architecture which can be considered as the best for all sorts of applications around the world. Based on requirements, constraints, environment, application architecture can differ from one to another. Trade-off factors are one of the important considerations while deciding a particular architectural solution. Employee Info Starter Kit is highly influenced by the concept ‘Pareto Principle’ or 80-20 rule, where it is targeted to enable a web developer to gain 80% productivity with 20% of effort with respect to learning curve and production. “Productivity” as the architectural objective typically also includes other trade-off factors as well as, such as testability, flexibility, performance etc. Fortunately Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0 and Visual Studio 2010 includes lots of great features that have been implemented cleverly in this project to reduce these trade-off factors in the minimum level. Why Employee Info Starter Kit is Not a Framework? Application frameworks are really great for productivity, some of which are really unavoidable in this modern age. However relying too many frameworks may overkill a project, as frameworks are typically designed to serve wide range of different usage and are less customizable or editable. On the other hand having implementation patterns can be useful for developers, as it enables them to adjust application on demand. Employee Info Starter Kit provides hundreds of “connected” snippets and implementation patterns to demonstrate problem solutions in actual production environment. It also includes Visual Studio T-4 templates that generate thousands lines of data access and business logic layer repetitive codes in literally few seconds on the fly, which are fully mock testable due to language support for partial methods and latest support for mock testing in Entity Framework. Why Employee Info Starter Kit is Different than Other Open-source Web Applications? Software development is one of the rapid growing industries around the globe, where the technology is being updated very frequently to adapt greater challenges over time. There are literally thousands of community web sites, blogs and forums that are dedicated to provide support to adapt new technologies. While some are really great to enable learning new technologies quickly, in most cases they are either too “simple and brief” to be used in real world scenarios or too “complex and detailed” which are typically focused to achieve a product goal (such as CMS, e-Commerce etc) from "end user" perspective and have a long duration learning curve with respect to the corresponding technology. Employee Info Starter Kit, as a web project, is basically "developer" oriented which actually considers a hybrid approach as “simple and detailed”, where a simple domain has been considered to intentionally illustrate most of the architectural and implementation challenges faced by web application developers so that anyone can dive into deep into the corresponding new technology or concept quickly. Roadmap Since its first release by 2008 in MSDN Code Gallery, Employee Info Starter Kit gained a huge popularity in ASP.NET community and had 1, 50,000+ downloads afterwards. Being encouraged with this great response, we have a strong commitment for the community to provide support for it with respect to latest technologies continuously. Currently hosted in Codeplex, this community driven project is planned to have a wide range of individual editions, each of which will be focused on a selected application architecture, framework or platform, such as ASP.NET Webform, ASP.NET Dynamic Data, ASP.NET MVC, jQuery Ajax (RIA), Silverlight (RIA), Azure Service Platform (Cloud), Visual Studio Automated Test etc. See here for full list of current and future editions.

  Read the article

• C# 4 Named Parameters for Overload Resolution

  - by Steve Michelotti

  C# 4 is getting a new feature called named parameters. Although this is a stand-alone feature, it is often used in conjunction with optional parameters. Last week when I was giving a presentation on C# 4, I got a question on a scenario regarding overload resolution that I had not considered before which yielded interesting results. Before I describe the scenario, a little background first. Named parameters is a well documented feature that works like this: suppose you have a method defined like this: 1: void DoWork(int num, string message = "Hello") 2: { 3: Console.WriteLine("Inside DoWork() - num: {0}, message: {1}", num, message); 4: } This enables you to call the method with any of these: 1: DoWork(21); 2: DoWork(num: 21); 3: DoWork(21, "abc"); 4: DoWork(num: 21, message: "abc"); and the corresponding results will be: Inside DoWork() - num: 21, message: Hello Inside DoWork() - num: 21, message: Hello Inside DoWork() - num: 21, message: abc Inside DoWork() - num: 21, message: abc This is all pretty straight forward and well-documented. What is slightly more interesting is how resolution is handled with method overloads. Suppose we had a second overload for DoWork() that looked like this: 1: void DoWork(object num) 2: { 3: Console.WriteLine("Inside second overload: " + num); 4: } The first rule applied for method overload resolution in this case is that it looks for the most strongly-type match first.  Hence, since the second overload has System.Object as the parameter rather than Int32, this second overload will never be called for any of the 4 method calls above.  But suppose the method overload looked like this: 1: void DoWork(int num) 2: { 3: Console.WriteLine("Inside second overload: " + num); 4: } In this case, both overloads have the first parameter as Int32 so they both fulfill the first rule equally.  In this case the overload with the optional parameters will be ignored if the parameters are not specified. Therefore, the same 4 method calls from above would result in: Inside second overload: 21 Inside second overload: 21 Inside DoWork() - num: 21, message: abc Inside DoWork() - num: 21, message: abc Even all this is pretty well documented. However, we can now consider the very interesting scenario I was presented with. The question was what happens if you change the parameter name in one of the overloads.  For example, what happens if you change the parameter *name* for the second overload like this: 1: void DoWork(int num2) 2: { 3: Console.WriteLine("Inside second overload: " + num2); 4: } In this case, the first 2 method calls will yield *different* results: 1: DoWork(21); 2: DoWork(num: 21); results in: Inside second overload: 21 Inside DoWork() - num: 21, message: Hello We know the first method call will go to the second overload because of normal method overload resolution rules which ignore the optional parameters.  But for the second call, even though all the same rules apply, the compiler will allow you to specify a named parameter which, in effect, overrides the typical rules and directs the call to the first overload. Keep in mind this would only work if the method overloads had different parameter names for the same types (which in itself is weird). But it is a situation I had not considered before and it is one in which you should be aware of the rules that the C# 4 compiler applies.

  Read the article

• Use Case Actors - Primary versus Secondary

  - by Dave Burke

  The Unified Modeling Language (UML1) defines an Actor (from UseCases) as: An actor specifies a role played by a user or any other system that interacts with the subject. In Alistair Cockburn’s book “Writing Effective Use Cases” (2) Actors are further defined as follows: Primary Actor: The primary actor of a use case is the stakeholder that calls on the system to deliver one of its services. It has a goal with respect to the system – one that can be satisfied by its operation. The primary actor is often, but not always, the actor who triggers the use case. Supporting Actors: A supporting actor in a use case in an external actor that provides a service to the system under design. It might be a high-speed printer, a web service, or humans that have to do some research and get back to us. In a 2006 article (3) Cockburn refined the definitions slightly to read: Primary Actors: The Actor(s) using the system to achieve a goal. The Use Case documents the interactions between the system and the actors to achieve the goal of the primary actor. Secondary Actors: Actors that the system needs assistance from to achieve the primary actor’s goal. Finally, the Oracle Unified Method (OUM) concurs with the UML definition of Actors, along with Cockburn’s refinement, but OUM also includes the following: Secondary actors may or may not have goals that they expect to be satisfied by the use case, the primary actor always has a goal, and the use case exists to satisfy the primary actor. Now that we are on the same “page”, let’s consider two examples: A bank loan officer wants to review a loan application from a customer, and part of the process involves a real-time credit rating check. Use Case Name: Review Loan Application Primary Actor: Loan Officer Secondary Actors: Credit Rating System A Human Resources manager wants to change the job code of an employee, and as part of the process, automatically notify several other departments within the company of the change. Use Case Name: Maintain Job Code Primary Actor: Human Resources Manager Secondary Actors: None The first example is quite straight forward; we need to define the Secondary Actor because without the “Credit Rating System” we cannot successfully complete the Use Case. In other words, the goal of the Primary Actor is to successfully complete the Loan Application, but they need the explicit “help” of the Secondary Actor (Credit Rating System) to achieve this goal. The second example is where people sometimes get confused. Within OUM we would not include the “other departments” as Secondary Actors and therefore not include them on the Use Case diagram for the following reasons: The other departments are not required for the successful completion of the Use Case We are not expecting any response from the other departments (at least within the bounds of the Use Case under discussion) Having said that, within the detail of the Use Case Specification Main Success Scenario, we would include something like: “The system sends a notification to the related department heads (ref. Business Rule BR101)” Now let’s consider one final example. A Procurement Manager wants to place a “bid” for some goods using an On-Line Trading Community (B2B version of eBay) Use Case Name: Create Bid Primary Actor: Procurement Manager Secondary Actors: On-Line Trading Community You might wonder why the Trading Community is listed as a Secondary Actor, i.e. if all we are going to do is place a bid for a specific quantity of goods at a given price and send that off to the Trading Community, then why would the Trading Community need to “assist” in that Use Case? Well, once again, it comes back to the “User Experience” and how we want to optimize that when we think about our Use Case, and ultimately, when the developer comes to assembling some code. In this final example, the Procurement Manager cannot successfully complete the “Create Bid” Use Case until they receive an affirmative confirmation back from the Trading Community that the Bid has been accepted. Therefore, the Trading Community must become a Secondary Actor and be referenced both on the Use Case diagram and Use Case Specification. Any astute readers who are wondering about the “single sitting” rule will have to wait for a follow-up Blog entry to find out how that consideration can be factored in!!! Happy Use Case writing! (1) OMG Unified Modeling LanguageTM (OMG UML), Superstructure Version 2.4.1 (2) Cockburn, A, 2000, Writing Effective Use Case, Addison-Wesley Professional; Edition 1 (3) Cockburn, A, 2006 “Use Case fundamentals” viewed 20th March 2012, http://alistair.cockburn.us/Use+case+fundamentals

  Read the article

• Can't get bonding and bridging to work for KVM

  - by user9546

  Hi everyone. I can't for the life of me get bonding and bridging to work for the KVM setup I'm building. I'm using a fresh install (not an upgrade) of Ubuntu Server 10.10. I have 4 NICs on the same subnet (two intended for each of my two VMs). I'm trying to achieve the setup that Uthark describes here. But following his guidelines didn't work for me. My eth0 and eth1 did not come up, and "brctl show" showed that br0 didn't have any interfaces (the bond). I assumed it didn't work because he's using 10.4, and this article says there's a recent change in bonding: [I can't post more than one hyperlink per post because I'm a newbie.] I had to use this article to get my interfaces to work at all on the same subnet, which is why I have the post-up lines on some of my interfaces: [I can't post more than one hyperlink per post because I'm a newbie.] I installed ifenslave and ethtool. I also created /etc/modprobe.d/aliases.conf with the following content: alias bond0 bonding options bonding mode=6 miimon=100 downdelay=200 updelay=200 And I included "bonding" in /etc/modules So, after several approaches, here is my latest interfaces file: auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth5 iface eth5 inet manual auto br5 iface br5 inet static post-up /sbin/ip rule add from [network].79 lookup 10 post-up /sbin/ip route add table 10 default via [network].1 src [network].79 dev br5 address [network].79 netmask 255.255.255.0 network [network].0 broadcast [network].255 gateway [network].1 bridge_ports eth5 bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 bridge_maxwait 0 auto eth2 iface eth2 inet manual auto br2 iface br2 inet static post-up /sbin/ip rule add from [network].78 lookup 11 post-up /sbin/ip route add table 11 default via [network].1 src [network].78 dev br2 address [network].78 netmask 255.255.255.0 network [network].0 broadcast [network].255 gateway [network].1 bridge_ports eth2 bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 bridge_maxwait 0 iface eth0 inet manual iface eth1 inet manual auto bond0 iface bond0 inet static bond_miimon 100 bond_mode balance-alb up /sbin/ifenslave bond0 eth0 eth1 down /sbin/ifenslave -d bond0 eth0 eth1 auto br0 iface br0 inet static address [network].60 netmask 255.255.255.0 network [network].0 broadcast [network].255 gateway [network].1 bridge_ports bond0 eth2, eth5, br2, and br5 all seem to be working fine. The only other thing I could find that looked suspicious is an error regarding bonding in /var/log/messages: kernel: [ 3.828684] bonding: Warning: either miimon or arp_interval and arp_ip_target module parameters must be specified, otherwise bonding will not detect link failures! see bonding.txt for details. even though there is a bond-miimon line in /etc/network/interfaces (if that's what they're talking about). Also, the bond seems to go in and out of promiscuous mode several times on boot: Jan 20 14:19:02 kvmhost kernel: [ 3.902378] device bond0 entered promiscuous mode Jan 20 14:19:02 kvmhost kernel: [ 3.902390] device bond0 left promiscuous mode Jan 20 14:19:02 kvmhost kernel: [ 3.902393] device bond0 entered promiscuous mode Jan 20 14:19:02 kvmhost kernel: [ 3.902397] device bond0 left promiscuous mode Jan 20 14:19:03 kvmhost kernel: [ 4.998990] device bond0 entered promiscuous mode Jan 20 14:19:03 kvmhost kernel: [ 4.999005] device bond0 left promiscuous mode Jan 20 14:19:03 kvmhost kernel: [ 4.999008] device bond0 entered promiscuous mode Jan 20 14:19:03 kvmhost kernel: [ 4.999012] device bond0 left promiscuous mode Any advice would be greatly appreciated. It seems that this must be possible, based on other posts, but I can't see what I'm doing wrong. Thanks.

  Read the article

• Web Application Integration Steps in OAM 11gR2 (High Level)

  - by Venkata Srikanth

  Install OAM, Webtier (OHS) and WebGate as per the standard installation steps. Create a WebGate instance (i.e deploy WebGate) A WebGate instance must be created that will copy required bits of agent from WEBGATE_HOME to WebGate instance location that shares the same INSTANCE_HOME with OHS ./deployWebGateInstance.sh –w /Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_WT1/instances/instance1/config/ohs1 –oh /Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_OAMWebGate1 Note: Here –w flag indicates OHS instance folder and –oh indicates the WebGate Oracle home Configure WebGate In the webgate configuration the EditHttpdConf utility will copy OUI instantiated apache_webgate.template from WEBGATE_HOME to webgate instance location (renamed to webgate.conf), and update httpd.conf with one additional line to include webgate.conf. export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_WT1/lib Navigate to /Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_OAMWebGate1/webgate/ohs/tools/setup/InstallTools ./EditHttpdConf –w /Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_WT1/instances/instace1/config/OHS/ohs1 –oh /Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_OAMWebGate1 –o webgate.conf Register WebGate Use RREG tool to register the OAM 11G WebGate Navigate to /Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_IDM1/oam/server/rreg/input Edit OAM11Grequest.xml. Change the specific xml content to include the weblogic admin URL, agentBaseURL, host identifier etc.. Navigate to /Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_IDM1/oam/server/rreg/bin Set permissions to oamreg.sh à chmod 777 oamreg.sh Edit oamreg.sh and set OAM_REG_HOME=/Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_IDM1/oam/server/rreg ./oamreg.sh inband input/OAM11Grequest.xml Enter the WebLogic admin credentials when prompted. After performing the above steps, there will be two artifcats created under Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_IDM1/oam/server/rreg/output, namely ObAccessClient.xml (Stroing webgate config parameters) and cwallet.sso (storing the agent key). These files must be copied to WebGate instance config folder (/Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_WT1/instances/instance1/config/ohs1/webgate/config) Restart OHS Deploy the web application (myApp) in WebLogic application server Proxy Configuration in OHS The mod_wl_ohs module enables requests to be proxied from Oracle HTTP Server 11g to Oracle WebLogic Server. Navigate to /Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_WT1/instances/instance1/config/OHS/ohs1 Edit mod_wl_ohs.conf file to include the following: <IfModule weblogic_module> WebLogicHost <WEBLOGIC_HOST> WebLogicPort <WEBLOGIC_PORT> # Debug ON # WLLogFile /tmp/weblogic.log MatchExpression *.jsp </IfModule> <Location /myApp> SetHandler weblogic-handler # PathTrim /weblogic # ErrorPage http:/WEBLOGIC_HOME:WEBLOGIC_PORT/ </Location> Note: Here WEBLOGIC_HOST and WEBLOGIC_PORT are the WebLogic admin server host and port respectively Restart OHS. Now if we access the web application URL with OHS host and port (Ex: http://OHS_HOST:<OHS_PORT>/myApp) so that the requests will be proxied to WebLogic server. Create a new application domain Login to OAM Admin Console Navigate to Shared Componentsà Authentication Schemesà Create Authentication Scheme (Ex: LDAP Auth Scheme. Here the scheme is assoicated with LDAP Authentication Module) Navigate to Policy Configuration à Application Domain à Create Application Domain Enter the Application Domain Name and Click Apply. Navigate to Resources tab and add the resource urls (Web Application URLs that needs to be protected) Navigate to Authentication Policy tab à Create a new authentication ploicy by providing the Resource URLs (The sample Web Application URLs) and Authentication Scheme. Navigate to Authorization Policy tab à Create a new authorization policy à Enter authorization policy name and navigate to Resource Tab à Attach the Reource URL, Host Identifiers here. Navigate to Conditions tab à Add the conditions like whom to allow and whom to deny access. Navigate to Rules tab à Crate the Allow Rule and Deny Rule with the available conditions from the previous step so that the Authorization Policy may authorize the logins. Navigate to Resources tab and attach the Authentication and Authorization plocies created in the above steps. Test the Web Application Integration.

  Read the article

• Book Review: Oracle ADF 11gR2 Development Beginner's Guide

  - by Grant Ronald

  Packt Publishing asked me to review Oracle ADF 11gR2 Development Beginner's Guide by Vinod Krishnan, so on a couple of long flights I managed to get through the book in a couple of sittings. One point to make clear before I go into the review.  Having authored "The Quick Start Guide to Fusion Development: JDeveloper and Oracle ADF", I've written a book which covers the same topic/beginner level.  I also think that its worth stating up front that I applaud anyone who has gone  through the effort of writing a technical book. So well done Vinod.  But on to the review: The book itself is a good break down of topic areas.  Vinod starts with a quick tour around the IDE, which is an important step given all the work you do will be through the IDE.  The book then goes through the general path that I tend to always teach: a quick overview demo, ADF BC, validation, binding, UI, task flows and then the various "add on" topics like security, MDS and advanced topics.  So it covers the right topics in, IMO, the right order.  I also think the writing style flows nicely as well - Its a relatively easy book to read, it doesn't get too formal and the "Have a go hero" hands on sections will be useful for many. That said, I did pick out a number of styles/themes to the writing that I found went against the idea of a beginners guide.  For example, in writing my book, I tried to carefully avoid talking about topics not yet covered or not yet relevant at that point in someone's learning.  So, if I was a new ADF developer reading this book, did I really need to know about ADFBindingFilter and DataBindings.cpx file on page 58 - I've only just learned how to do a drag and drop simple application so showing me XML configuration files relevant to JSF/ADF lifecycle is probably going to scare me off! I found this in a couple of places, for example, the security chapter starts on page 219 but by page 222 (and most of the preceding pages are hands-on steps) we're diving into the web.xml, weblogic.xml, adf-config.xml, jsp-config.xml and jazn-data.xml.  Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying you shouldn't know this, but I feel you have to get people on a strong grounding of the concepts before showing them implementation files.  If having just learned what ADF Security is will "The initialization parameter remove.anonymous.role is set to false for the JpsFilter filter as this filter is the first filter defined in the file" really going to help me? The other theme I found which I felt didn't work was that a couple of the chapters descended into a reference guide.  For example page 159 onwards basically lists UI components and their properties.  And page 87 onwards list the attributes of ADF BC in pretty much the same way as the on line help or developer guide, and I've a personal aversion to any sort of help that says pretty much what the attribute name is e.g. "Precision Rule: this option is used to set a strict precision rule", or "Property Set: this is the property set that has to be applied to the attribute". Hmmm, I think I could have worked that out myself, what I would want to know in a beginners guide are what are these for, what might I use them for...and if I don't need to use them to create an emp/dept example them maybe it’s better to leave them out. All that said, would the book help me - yes it would.  It’s obvious that Vinod knows ADF and his style is relatively easy going and the book covers all that it has to, but I think the book could have done a better job in the educational side of guiding beginners.

  Read the article

• VirtualBox Clone Root HD / Ubuntu / Network issue

  - by john.graves(at)oracle.com

  When you clone a root Ubuntu disk in VirtualBox, one thing that gets messed up is the network card definition.  This is because Ubuntu (as it should) uses UDEV IDs for the network device.  When you boot your new disk, the network device ID has changed, so it creates a new eth1 device.  Unfortunately, this conflicts with the VirtualBox network setup.  What to do? Boot the box (no network) Edit the /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules Delete the eth0 line and modify the eth1 line to be eth0 --------- Example OLD ----------- # This file was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_net_rules # program, run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file. # # You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single # line, and change only the value of the NAME= key. # PCI device 0x8086:0x100e (e1000) <-------------------- Delete these two lines SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="08:00:27:d8:8d:15", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0" # PCI device 0x8086:0x100e (e1000) ---Modify the next line and change eth1 to be eth0 SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="08:00:27:89:84:98", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth1" .csharpcode, .csharpcode pre { font-size: small; color: black; font-family: consolas, "Courier New", courier, monospace; background-color: #ffffff; /*white-space: pre;*/ } .csharpcode pre { margin: 0em; } .csharpcode .rem { color: #008000; } .csharpcode .kwrd { color: #0000ff; } .csharpcode .str { color: #006080; } .csharpcode .op { color: #0000c0; } .csharpcode .preproc { color: #cc6633; } .csharpcode .asp { background-color: #ffff00; } .csharpcode .html { color: #800000; } .csharpcode .attr { color: #ff0000; } .csharpcode .alt { background-color: #f4f4f4; width: 100%; margin: 0em; } .csharpcode .lnum { color: #606060; } ---------------------------------------- --------- Example NEW ----------- # This file was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_net_rules # program, run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file. # # You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single # line, and change only the value of the NAME= key. # PCI device 0x8086:0x100e (e1000) SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="08:00:27:89:84:98", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0" .csharpcode, .csharpcode pre { font-size: small; color: black; font-family: consolas, "Courier New", courier, monospace; background-color: #ffffff; /*white-space: pre;*/ } .csharpcode pre { margin: 0em; } .csharpcode .rem { color: #008000; } .csharpcode .kwrd { color: #0000ff; } .csharpcode .str { color: #006080; } .csharpcode .op { color: #0000c0; } .csharpcode .preproc { color: #cc6633; } .csharpcode .asp { background-color: #ffff00; } .csharpcode .html { color: #800000; } .csharpcode .attr { color: #ff0000; } .csharpcode .alt { background-color: #f4f4f4; width: 100%; margin: 0em; } .csharpcode .lnum { color: #606060; } ----------------------------------------

  Read the article

• A proposal for #DAX Code Formatting #ssas #powerpivot #tabular

  - by Marco Russo (SQLBI)

  I recently published a set of rules for DAX code formatting. The following is an example of what I obtain: CALCULATE (     SUMX (         Orders,         Orders[Amount]     ),     FILTER (         ALL ( Customers ),         CALCULATE (             COUNTROWS ( Sales ),             ALL ( Calendar[Date] )         ) > 42 + 8 – 25 * ( 3 - 1 )             + 2 – 1 + 2 – 1             + CALCULATE (                   2 + 2 – 2                   + 2 - 2               )             – CALCULATE ( 4 )     ) ) The goal is to improve code readability and I look forward to implement a code formatting feature in DAX Studio. The DAX Editor already supports the rules described in the article. I am also considering whether to add a rule specific for ADDCOLUMNS / SUMMARIZE because I would like to see the “pairs” of arguments to define a column in the same row or with a special indentation rule (DAX expression for a column is indented in the line following the column name). EVALUATE CALCULATETABLE (        CALCULATETABLE (         SUMMARIZE (             Audience,             'Date'[Year],             Individuals[Gender],             Individuals[AgeRange],             "Num of Rows", FORMAT (COUNTROWS (Audience), "#,#"),             "Weighted Mean Age",                 SUMX (Audience, Audience[Weight] * Audience[Age]) / SUM (Audience[Weight])         ),         SUMMARIZE (             BridgeIndividualsTargets,             Individuals[ID_Individual]         ),         Audience[Weight] > 0        ),        Targets[Target] = "Maschi",     'Date'[Year] = 2010,     'Date'[MonthName] = "January" ) I would like to get feedback for that – you can use comments here or comments in original article. Thanks!

  Read the article

• Appropriate design / technologies to handle dynamic string formatting?

  - by Mark W

  recently I was tasked with implementing a way of adding support for versioning of hardware packet specifications to one of our libraries. First a bit of information about the project. We have a hardware library which has classes for each of the various commands we support sending to our hardware. These hardware modules are essentially just lights with a few buttons, and a 2 or 4 digit display. The packets typically follow the format {SOH}AADD{ETX}, where AA is our sentinel action code, and DD is the device ID. These packet specs are different from one command to the next obviously, and the different firmware versions we have support different specifications. For example, on version 1 an action code of 14 may have a spec of {SOH}AADDTEXT{ETX} which would be AA = 14 literal, DD = device ID, TEXT = literal text to display on the device. Then we come out with a revision with adds an extended byte(s) onto the end of the packet like this {SOH}AADDTEXTE{ETX}. Assume the TEXT field is fixed width for this example. We have now added a new field onto the end which could be used to say specify the color or flash rate of the text/buttons. Currently this java library only supports one version of the commands, the latest. In our hardware library we would have a class for this command, say a DisplayTextArgs.java. That class would have fields for the device ID, the text, and the extended byte. The command class would expose a method which generates the string ("{SOH}AADDTEXTE{ETX}") using the value from the class. In practice we would create the Args class as needed, populate the fields, call the method to get our packet string, then ship that down across the CAN. Some of our other commands specification can vary for the same command, on the same version, depending on some runtime state. For example, another command for version 1 may be {SOH}AA{ETX}, where this action code clears all of the modules behind a specific controller device of their text. We may overload this packet to have option fields with multiple meanings like {SOH}AAOC{ETX} where OC is literal text, which tells the controller to only clear text on a specific module type, and to leave the others alone, or the spec could also have an option format of {SOH}AADD{ETX} to clear the text off a a specific device. Currently, in the method which generates the packet string, we would evaluate fields on the args class to determine which spec we will be using when formatting the packet. For this example, it would be along the lines of: if m_DeviceID != null then use {SOH}AADD{ETX} else if m_ClearOCs == true then use {SOH}AAOC{EXT} else use {SOH}AA{ETX} I had considered using XML, or a database to store String.format format strings, which were linked to firmware version numbers in some table. We would load them up at startup, and pass in the version number of the hardwares firmware we are currently using (I can query the devices for their firmware version, but the version is not included in all packets as part of the spec). This breaks down pretty quickly because of the dynamic nature of how we select which version of the command to use. I then considered using a rule engine to possibly build out expressions which could be interpreted at runtume, to evaluate the args class's state, and from that select the appropriate format string to use, but my brief look at rule engines for java scared me away with its complexity. While it seems like it might be a viable solution, it seems overly complex. So this is why I am here. I wouldn't say design is my strongest skill, and im having trouble figuring out the best way to approach this problem. I probably wont be able to radically change the args classes, but if the trade off was good enough, I may be able to convince my boss that the change is appropriate. What I would like from the community is some feedback on some best practices / design methodologies / API or other resources which I could use to accomplish: Logic to determine which set of commands to use for a given firmware version Of those command, which version of each command to use (based on the args classes state) Keep the rules logic decoupled from the application so as to avoid needing releases for every firmware version Be simple enough so I don't need weeks of study and trial and error to implement effectively.

  Read the article

• How to be Agile when new work keeps affecting completed work?

  - by jdln

  The project I'm working on is to re-skin an existing website. The functionally will stay the same, its just the styles that are changing. The HTML is not changing, I'm only modifying the CSS files. The site is pretty complex. There are dozens of pages. Users can be logged in and have a number of different roles. Depending on their role the content of the page and what pages they are allowed to see varys. We're using GIT and Github. I'm trying to write CSS that works as components. So when the same form elements, headings, etc appear on multiple pages they are already styled and are consistent. Most of time this is working well. Sadly the format and class names in the HTML are at times messy and unpredictable. When I fix something on one page it can break another. The job is also harder as no one knows exactly all the variations that are possible due to the user roles. As such I'm continuously finding new variations as I go along. I'm making headway by putting a lot of comments in my CSS. If I need to remove a CSS rule Ill comment it out so I can still see it with the chrome dev tools, and ill put a comment in the CSS saying why I removed it and for what page this was done. This means that if on another page I'm about to add add the rule to fix a different problem, there is more of a chance I will see how this would break the first page. This allows me to either find a different solution that will work for both pages, or I can make the override page specific. This has been working quite well for me. If I had complete free reign and the only deadline was to finish the project by the end then this method would be fine. However my manager is trying to mitigate risk by breaking the work into areas to be completed per sprint. This is counter to how I have been approaching things as something like my typography styles will affect all other pages on the site. The other issue is that the different stakeholders want to sign off each section as I go along. However once I've finished a section it may change if I change CSS that affects it and also affects a new section I'm working on. I've asked that the stakeholders have a quick unofficial sign off in stages (eg per sprint), and have the final official sign off at the end of the project, but this is being met with resistance. I do understand why it would be higher risk to do this, but the only way to guarantee that a signed off section will not change is to make ALL future changes page specific. In addition to this I'm being told that all work that I push to the Git repo should be ready to go live, and as such should not contain any code comments. This is risky for me as I wont know until I've finished the site if I will ever benefit from these comments or not. Has anyone else been in a similar situation and managed to find a compromise that worked for my development approach and also the desires of management and stakeholders to have a more Agile approach? A more Agile workflow works great when you can break the work into components and know that once something is done it wont be affected by future work. However the nature of this project makes this hard to achieve.

  Read the article

• Scrapy issue with iTunes' AppStore

  - by Eric

  I am using Scrapy to fetch some data from iTunes' AppStore database. I start with this list of apps: http://itunes.apple.com/us/genre/mobile-software-applications/id36?mt=8 In the following code I have used the simplest regex which targets all apps in the US store. from scrapy.contrib.linkextractors.sgml import SgmlLinkExtractor from scrapy.contrib.spiders import CrawlSpider, Rule class AppStoreSpider(CrawlSpider): domain_name = 'itunes.apple.com' start_urls = ['http://itunes.apple.com/us/genre/mobile-software-applications/id6015?mt=8'] rules = ( Rule(SgmlLinkExtractor(allow='itunes\.apple\.com/us/app'), 'parse_app', follow=True, ), ) def parse_app(self, response): .... SPIDER = AppStoreSpider() When I run it I receive the following: [itunes.apple.com] DEBUG: Crawled (200) <GET http://itunes.apple.com/us/genre/mobile-software-applications/id6015?mt=8> (referer: None) [itunes.apple.com] DEBUG: Filtered offsite request to 'itunes.apple.com': <GET http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/bloomberg/id281941097?mt=8> As you can see, when it starts crawling the first page it says: "Filtered offsite request to 'itunes.apple.com'". and then the spider stops.. it also returns this message: [ScrapyHTTPPageGetter,client] /usr/lib/python2.5/cookielib.py:1577: exceptions.UserWarning: cookielib bug! Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/cookielib.py", line 1575, in make_cookies parse_ns_headers(ns_hdrs), request) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/cookielib.py", line 1532, in _cookies_from_attrs_set cookie = self._cookie_from_cookie_tuple(tup, request) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/cookielib.py", line 1451, in _cookie_from_cookie_tuple if version is not None: version = int(version) ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '"1"' I have used the same script for other website and I didn't have this problem. Any suggestion?

  Read the article

• How to change TestNG dataProvider order

  - by momad

  Hi, I am running hundreds of tests against a large publishing system and would like to paralellize the tests using TestNG. However, I cannot find any easy way of doing this. Each test case instanciates an instance of this publisher, send some messages, wait for those messages to be published, then dump out the contents of the publish queues and compare against expected outcome. Doing this with so many tests (even if I paralellize using threads, still takes a very long time to complete (1 day or more)). We've found that in testing this sort of system, it's best to start up system once, run all tests to send their messages, wait for publish to do its thing, dump all outputs, and match outputs with tests and verify. For example, instead of the following: @Test public void testRule1() { Publisher pub = new Publisher(); pub.sendRule(new Rule("test1-a")); sleep(10); // wait 10 seconds pub.dumpRules(); verifyRule("test1-a"); } We wanted to do something like the following: @Test public void testRule1(bool sendMode) { if(sendMode) { this.pub.sendRule(new Rule("test1-a")); } else { verifyRule("test1-a"); } } Where you have a dataProvider run through all the tests with sendMode = true and then perform dumpAllRules() followed by running through all of the tests again with sendMode = false. The problem is, TestNG calls the same method twice, once with sendMode = true followed by sendMode = false. Is there anyway to accomplish this in TestNG? Thanks!

  Read the article

• IIS7 Web.Config Custom Errors

  - by Michael

  Using GoDaddy to host my site (I know that's my first problem)! :-) Trying to setup customer error messages for my site. GoDaddy allows you to setup a 404 in their control panel, but I can't override this, or setup any additional error redirects, specifically a 500-server error. Here is my web.config file: <configuration> <system.webServer> <rewrite> <rules> <rule name="Redirect to WWW" stopProcessing="true"> <match url=".*" /> <conditions> <add input="{HTTP_HOST}" pattern="^mysite.com$" /> </conditions> <action type="Redirect" url="http://www.mysite.com/{R:0}" redirectType="Permanent" /> </rule> </rules> </rewrite> </system.webServer> <system.web> <customErrors mode="On" defaultRedirect="http://www.mysite.com/oops.php"> <error statusCode="404" redirect="http://www.mysite.com/oops.php?error=404" /> <error statusCode="500" redirect="http://www.mysite.com/oops.php?error=500" /> </customErrors> </system.web> </configuration>

  Read the article

• Custom Error Handling

  - by Michael

  Using GoDaddy to host my site (I know that's my first problem)! :-) Trying to setup customer error messages for my site using IIS7. GoDaddy allows you to setup a 404 in their control panel, but I can't override this, or setup any additional error redirects, specifically a 500-server error. Here is my web.config file: <configuration> <system.webServer> <rewrite> <rules> <rule name="Redirect to WWW" stopProcessing="true"> <match url=".*" /> <conditions> <add input="{HTTP_HOST}" pattern="^mysite.com$" /> </conditions> <action type="Redirect" url="http://www.mysite.com/{R:0}" redirectType="Permanent" /> </rule> </rules> </rewrite> </system.webServer> <system.web> <customErrors mode="On" defaultRedirect="http://www.mysite.com/oops.php"> <error statusCode="404" redirect="http://www.mysite.com/oops.php?error=404" /> <error statusCode="500" redirect="http://www.mysite.com/oops.php?error=500" /> </customErrors> </system.web> </configuration>

  Read the article

• Custom Error Handling

  - by Michael

  Using GoDaddy to host my site (I know that's my first problem)! :-) Trying to setup custom error messages for my site using IIS7. GoDaddy allows you to setup a 404 in their control panel, but I can't override this, or setup any additional error redirects, specifically a 500-server error. Here is my web.config file: <configuration> <system.webServer> <rewrite> <rules> <rule name="Redirect to WWW" stopProcessing="true"> <match url=".*" /> <conditions> <add input="{HTTP_HOST}" pattern="^mysite.com$" /> </conditions> <action type="Redirect" url="http://www.mysite.com/{R:0}" redirectType="Permanent" /> </rule> </rules> </rewrite> </system.webServer> <system.web> <customErrors mode="On" defaultRedirect="http://www.mysite.com/oops.php"> <error statusCode="404" redirect="http://www.mysite.com/oops.php?error=404" /> <error statusCode="500" redirect="http://www.mysite.com/oops.php?error=500" /> </customErrors> </system.web> </configuration>

  Read the article

• Class Structure w/ LINQ, Partial Classes, and Abstract Classes

  - by Jason

  I am following the Nerd Dinner tutorial as I'm learning ASP.NET MVC, and I am currently on Step 3: Building the Model. One part of this section discusses how to integrate validation and business rule logic with the model classes. All this makes perfect sense. However, in the case of this source code, the author only validates one class: Dinner. What I am wondering is, say I have multiple classes that need validation (Dinner, Guest, etc). It doesn't seem smart to me to repeatedly write these two methods in the partial class: public bool IsValid { get { return (GetRuleViolations().Count() == 0); } } partial void OnValidate(ChangeAction action) { if (!IsValid) { throw new ApplicationException("Rule violations prevent saving."); } } What I'm wondering is, can you create an abstract class (because "GetRuleViolations" needs to be implemented separately) and extend a partial class? I'm thinking something like this (based on his example): public partial class Dinner : Validation { public IEnumerable<RuleViolation> GetRuleViolations() { yield break; } } This doesn't "feel" right, but I wanted to check with SO to get opinions of individuals smarter than me on this. I also tested it out, and it seems that the partial keyword on the OnValidate method is causing problems (understandably so). This doesn't seem possible to fix (but I could very well be wrong). Thanks!

  Read the article

• Globally disabling FxCop errors in TeamCity

  - by Dave

  Ok, another FxCop question for today. I've read the arguments regarding the IdentifiersShouldBeCasedCorrectly rule, and whether or not it should be "XML" or "Xml". Well, I'm an "XML" guy and I want to stay that way. Therefore, I do not want FxCop to correct me all of the time. I have been using the SuppressMessage attribute only for specific cases. I have also used FxCop to mark a ton of errors and copied them as "module" level SuppressMessage statements into assemblyinfo.cs. That works pretty well. However, now I really want to globally disable this annoying IdentifiersShouldBeCasedCorrectly rule. I'm using TeamCity 5.0.3, and am not using an FxCop project file (however, I could do this). I was hoping that I could pass a parameter to FxCopCmd to tell it to ignore this error, but it doesn't look that way from the documentation. So... is there anything I can do short of creating an FxCop project file on the TeamCity build server and using it for the FxCop build runner?

  Read the article

• Latex renewcommand not working properly

  - by Nazgulled

  Why is this not working: \documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{article} \usepackage{a4wide} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[portuguese]{babel} \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} \usepackage{indentfirst} \usepackage{listings} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \usepackage{url} \usepackage[compat2,a4paper,left=25mm,right=25mm,bottom=15mm,top=20mm]{geometry} \usepackage{color} \usepackage[colorlinks]{hyperref} \usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx} \renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0.4pt} \renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0.4pt} \pagestyle{fancy} \fancyhead[L]{\small Laboratórios de Informática III} \fancyhead[R]{\small Projecto 1 (Linguagem \textsf{C})} \lstset{ basicstyle=\ttfamily\footnotesize, showstringspaces=false, frame=single, tabsize=4, breaklines=true, } \definecolor{Section1}{rgb}{0.09,0.21,0.36} \definecolor{Section2}{rgb}{0.21,0.37,0.56} \definecolor{Section3}{rgb}{0.30,0.50,0.74} \hypersetup{ bookmarks=false, linkcolor=red, urlcolor=cyan, } \renewcommand{\section}[1]{\texorpdfstring{\color{green}#1}{#1}} \parskip=6pt \begin{document} \begin{titlepage} \begin{center} \includegraphics[width=5cm]{./logo.jpg}\\[1cm] \textsc{\LARGE Universidade do Minho}\\[1cm] \textsc{\large Licenciatura em Engenharia Informática\\Laboratórios de Informática III}\\[1.5cm] \rule{\linewidth}{0.5mm}\\[0.4cm] \huge{\textbf{\textsc{Relatório do Projecto 1 (Linguagem C)}}} \rule{\linewidth}{0.5mm} \vfill \begin{tabular}{c c} \includegraphics[width=3.5cm]{./nuno.jpg} & \includegraphics[width=3.5cm]{./ricardo.jpg} \\ \textsc{\large{Nuno Mendes (51161)}} & \textsc{\large{Ricardo Amaral (48404)}} \\ \end{tabular} \vfill \large{\today} \end{center} \end{titlepage} \tableofcontents \newpage \section{Introdução} Lorem ipsum... \newpage \appendix \section{\color{Section1}Diagrama das Estruturas de Dados} \begin{center} \includegraphics[width=16cm]{./Diagrama.pdf} \end{center} \end{document} ! LaTeX Error: Something's wrong--perhaps a missing \item. See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation. Type H for immediate help. ... l.2 ...rline {1}\color {green}Teste}{3}{section.1} How can I make it work properly?

  Read the article

• WPF TexBox TwoWay Binding Problem when ValidationRules used

  - by ignis

  I seem to have a problem with TwoWay DataBinding - my application has a window with a bunch of textboxes that allow to edit values of the properties they are bound to. Everything works well except for textboxes that also have a validation rule defined, in which case no text is displayed in the textbox when the window opens (binding back-to-source still works fine for those). If I remove Validation rule, everything's back to normal. I searched for an answer to this for a few hours now, but somehow did not even find anyone else complaining of the same issue. I am completely new to WPF, and I am sure it is just a silly mistake I have somewhere in my code... I will greatly appreciate any feedback... <TextBox Margin="40,2,20,0" Grid.Column="0" Grid.Row="1" Background="#99FFFFFF" > <Binding Path="LastName" Mode="TwoWay" ValidatesOnDataErrors="true" UpdateSourceTrigger="LostFocus" > <Binding.ValidationRules> <validation:StringNameValidationRule /> </Binding.ValidationRules> </Binding> </TextBox>

  Read the article

• Make seems to think a prerequisite is an intermediate file, removes it

  - by James

  For starters, this exercise in GNU make was admittedly just that: an exercise rather than a practicality, since a simple bash script would have sufficed. However, it brought up interesting behavior I don't quite understand. I've written a seemingly simple Makefile to handle generation of SSL key/cert pairs as necessary for MySQL. My goal was for make <name> to result in <name>-key.pem, <name>-cert.pem, and any other necessary files (specifically, the CA pair if any of it is missing or needs updating, which leads into another interesting follow-up exercise of handling reverse deps to reissue any certs that had been signed by a missing/updated CA cert). After executing all rules as expected, make seems to be too aggressive at identifying intermediate files for removal; it removes a file I thought would be "safe" since it should have been generated as a prereq to the main rule I'm invoking. (Humbly translated, I likely have misinterpreted make's documented behavior to suit my expectation, but don't understand how. ;-) Edited (thanks, Chris!) Adding %-cert.pem to .PRECIOUS does, of course, prevent the deletion. (I had been using the wrong syntax.) Makefile: OPENSSL = /usr/bin/openssl # Corrected, thanks Chris! .PHONY: clean default: ca clean: rm -I *.pem %: %-key.pem %-cert.pem @# Placeholder (to make this implicit create a rule and not cancel one) Makefile: @# Prevent the catch-all from matching Makefile ca-cert.pem: ca-key.pem $(OPENSSL) req -new -x509 -nodes -days 1000 -key ca-key.pem $@ %-key.pem: $(OPENSSL) genrsa 2048 $@ %-cert.pem: %-csr.pem ca-cert.pem ca-key.pem $(OPENSSL) x509 -req -in $ $@ Output: $ make host1 /usr/bin/openssl genrsa 2048 ca-key.pem /usr/bin/openssl req -new -x509 -nodes -days 1000 -key ca-key.pem ca-cert.pem /usr/bin/openssl genrsa 2048 host1-key.pem /usr/bin/openssl req -new -days 1000 -nodes -key host1-key.pem host1-csr.pem /usr/bin/openssl x509 -req -in host1-csr.pem -days 1000 -CA ca-cert.pem -CAkey ca-key.pem -set_serial 01 host1-cert.pem rm host1-csr.pem host1-cert.pem This is driving me crazy, and I'll happily try any suggestions and post results. If I'm just totally noobing out on this one, feel free to jibe away. You can't possibly hurt my feelings. :)

  Read the article

• PF, load balanced gateways, and Squid

  - by Santa

  Hi, So I have a FreeBSD router running PF and Squid, and it has three network interfaces: two connected to upstream providers (em0 and em1 respectively), and one for LAN (re0) that we serve. There is some load balancing configured with PF. Basically, it routes all traffic to ports 1-1024 through one interface (em0) and everything else through the other (em1). Now, I have a Squid proxy also running on the box that transparently redirects any HTTP request from LAN to port 3128 in 127.0.0.1. Since Squid redirects this request to HTTP outside, it should follow the load balancing rule through em0, no? The problem is, when we tested it out (by browsing from a computer in the LAN to http://whatismyip.com, it reports the external IP of the em1 interface! When we turn Squid off, the external IP of em0 is reported, as expected. How do I make Squid behave with the load balancing rule that we have set up? Here's the related settings in /etc/pf.conf that I have: ext_if1="em1" # DSL ext_if2="em0" # T1 int_if="re0" ext_gw1="x.x.x.1" ext_gw2="y.y.y.1" int_addr="10.0.0.1" int_net="10.0.0.0/16" dsl_ports = "1024:65535" t1_ports = "1:1023" ... squid=3128 rdr on $int_if inet proto tcp from $int_net \ to any port 80 -> 127.0.0.1 port $squid pass in quick on $int_if route-to lo0 inet proto tcp \ from $int_net to 127.0.0.1 port $squid keep state ... # load balancing pass in on $int_if route-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1) \ proto tcp from $int_net to any port $dsl_ports keep state pass in on $int_if route-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1) \ proto udp from $int_net to any port $dsl_ports pass in on $int_if route-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) \ proto tcp from $int_net to any port $t1_ports keep state pass in on $int_if route-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) \ proto udp from $int_net to any port $t1_ports Thanks!

  Read the article

• WSO2 ESB on Carbon 4.2 - Did not find the desired phase 'Transport' while deploying handler 'POXSecurityHandler'

  - by user3385500

  I'm new to WSO2 ESB and would like to try it out for some external integrations. I've installed the WSO2 Carbon 4.2 server and installed the ESB feature 4.8.1. After a restart, I'm getting some errors as below. Any tips or suggestions would be gratefully accepted. Thanks. [2014-03-06 10:01:08,521] INFO {org.wso2.carbon.mediation.initializer.ServiceBusInitializer} - Initializing Apache Synapse... [2014-03-06 10:01:08,525] FATAL {org.wso2.carbon.mediation.initializer.ServiceBusInitializer} - Couldn't initialize the ESB... org.apache.synapse.SynapseException: The synapse.xml location ././ ./repository/deployment/server/synapse-configs /default doesn't exist at org.apache.synapse.SynapseControllerFactory.handleFatal(SynapseControllerFactory.java:121) at org.apache.synapse.SynapseControllerFactory.validatePath(SynapseControllerFactory.java:113) at org.apache.synapse.SynapseControllerFactory.validate(SynapseControllerFactory.java:88) at org.apache.synapse.SynapseControllerFactory.createSynapseController(SynapseControllerFactory.java:44) at org.apache.synapse.ServerManager.init(ServerManager.java:102) at org.wso2.carbon.mediation.initializer.ServiceBusInitializer.initESB(ServiceBusInitializer.java:423) at org.wso2.carbon.mediation.initializer.ServiceBusInitializer.activate(ServiceBusInitializer.java:182) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) ... ... ... [2014-03-06 10:01:08,531] INFO {org.wso2.carbon.rule.kernel.internal.ds.RuleEngineConfigDS} - Successfully registered the Rule Config service [2014-03-06 10:01:08,553] ERROR {org.wso2.carbon.security.internal.SecurityMgtServiceComponent} - Failed to activate SecurityMgtServiceComponent org.apache.axis2.phaseresolver.PhaseException: Did not find the desired phase 'Transport' while deploying handler 'POXSecurityHandler'. at org.apache.axis2.phaseresolver.PhaseHolder.addHandler(PhaseHolder.java:75) at org.apache.axis2.phaseresolver.PhaseResolver.engageModuleToFlow(PhaseResolver.java:68) at org.apache.axis2.phaseresolver.PhaseResolver.engageModuleToOperation(PhaseResolver.java:104) at org.apache.axis2.phaseresolver.PhaseResolver.engageModuleToOperation(PhaseResolver.java:110) at org.apache.axis2.description.AxisOperation.onEngage(AxisOperation.java:152) at org.apache.axis2.description.AxisDescription.engageModule(AxisDescription.java:478) at org.apache.axis2.description.AxisService.onEngage(AxisService.java:827) at org.apache.axis2.description.AxisDescription.engageModule(AxisDescription.java:478) at org.apache.axis2.description.AxisServiceGroup.onEngage(AxisServiceGroup.java:134)

  Read the article

• Wordpress Rewrite Redirect Failure

  - by Rory Hart

  I'm helping a friend recover from the mess outsourcing a wordpress website caused him (mistake #1) and I have this weird error. The hosting he is using appears to be redirecting www.domain.com to domain.com (NFI why) automatically which works fine in every browser except IE (i know right!). So adding the first redirect fixed that, until I added the permalink redirect. Now when IE goes to an old wordpress link like http://www.domain.com/?p=520 the redirect fails. RewriteEngine On RewriteBase / # Rewrite rule for wierd redirect issue RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.domain.com$ RewriteRule ^/?(.*)$ "http\:\/\/doman\.com\/$1" [R=301,L] # Rewrite Rule for Wordress Permalinks RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule . /index.php [L] I tested this out with wget and it complains: ERROR: Redirection (301) without location. So it seems likely that IE is suffering from the same error (without the helpful error message). But I haven't a clue how to fix it. I am hoping that he will switch hosting companies but we will see. In the meantime any ideas?

  Read the article

• Interface and partial classes

  - by Tomek Tarczynski

  According to rule SA1201 in StyleCop elements in class must appear in correct order. The order is following: Fields Constructors Finalizers (Destructors) Delegates Events Enums Interfaces Properties Indexers Methods Structs Classes Everything is ok, except of Interfaces part, because Interface can contain mehtods, events, properties etc... If we want to be strict about this rule then we won't have all members of Interface in one place which is often very useful. According to StyleCop help this problem can be solved by spliting class into partial classes. Example: /// <summary> /// Represents a customer of the system. /// </summary> public partial class Customer { // Contains the main functionality of the class. } /// <content> /// Implements the ICollection class. /// </content> public partial class Customer : ICollection { public int Count { get { return this.count; } } public bool IsSynchronized { get { return false; } } public object SyncRoot { get { return null; } } public void CopyTo(Array array, int index) { throw new NotImplementedException(); } } Are there any other good solutions to this problem?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53  | Next Page >