Search Results

Search found 12476 results on 500 pages for 'memory leak detector'.

Page 48/500 | < Previous Page | 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55  | Next Page >

  • Java Thread - Memory consistency errors

    - by Yatendra Goel
    I was reading a Sun's tutorial on Concurrency. But I couldn't understand exactly what memory consistency errors are? I googled about that but didn't find any helpful tutorial or article about that. I know that this question is a subjective one, so you can provide me links to articles on the above topic. It would be great if you explain it with a simple example.

    Read the article

  • iPhone memory management, a newbie question

    - by Reuven
    Hi, I've seen in (Apple) sample code two types of ways of allocation memory, and am not sure I understand the difference and resulting behavior. // FAILS NSMutableArray *anArray = [NSMutableArray array]; [anArray release]; // WORKS NSMutableArray *anArray1 = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init]; [anArray release]; By "FAILS" I mean I get crashes/runtime warnings etc., and not always as soon as I call the release... Any explanation appreciated. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Visual Studio Memory Hog

    - by gentoo_drummer
    I have installed Visual Studio Express Web Developer 2010 and boy it really slows my system down a lot. Is there a way to identify the services like SQL Server and set them to manual so I can avoid all my memory resources been occupied when not using Visual Studio? Is it just SQL Express the problem or are there any other things I should consider disabling in order to have a fast and reliable system when not using Visual Studio? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Why exactly is calling the destructor for the second time undefined behavior in C++?

    - by sharptooth
    As mentioned in this answer simply calling the destructor for the second time is already undefined behavior 12.4/14(3.8). For example: class Class { public: ~Class() {} }; // somewhere in code: { Class* object = new Class(); object->~Class(); delete object; // UB because at this point the destructor call is attempted again } In this example the class is designed in such a way that the destructor could be called multiple times - no things like double-deletion can happen. The memory is still allocated at the point where delete is called - the first destructor call doesn't call the ::operator delete() to release memory. For example, in Visual C++ 9 the above code looks working. Even C++ definition of UB doesn't directly prohibit things qualified as UB from working. So for the code above to break some implementation and/or platform specifics are required. Why exactly would the above code break and under what conditions?

    Read the article

  • Class destructor memory handling in C++

    - by wyatt
    What potential memory leaks won't an implicit destructor handle? I know that if you have anything stored on the heap it won't handle it, and if you have a connection to a file or a database, that needs to be handled manually. Is there anything else? What about, say, non-base data types like vectors? Also, in an explicit destructor, need you destroy non-heap variables which would have been destroyed by the implicit, or are they handled automatically? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Ruby: execute a binary file in memory?

    - by John
    Is it possible to read binary in ruby file and execute it directly in memory? for example something like this: x = IO.read('/bin/ls') execute(x) I tried system(x) but it doesn't work ArgumentError: string contains null byte

    Read the article

  • Pointers in For loops

    - by Bobby
    Quick question: I am a C# guy debugging a C++ app so I am not used to memory management. In the following code: for(int i = 0; i < TlmMsgDB.CMTGetTelemMsgDBCount(); i++) { CMTTelemetryMsgCls* telm = TlmMsgDB.CMTGetTelemetryMsg(i); CMT_SINT32_Tdef id = telm->CMTGetPackingMapID(); ManualScheduleTables.SetManualMsg(i,id); ManualScheduleTables.SetManExec(i,false); } Am I leaking memory every iteration b/c of CMTTelemetryMsgCls* telm = TlmMsgDB.CMTGetTelemetryMsg(i);? The "CMTGetTelemetryMsg(int)" method returns a pointer. Do I have to "delete telm;" at the end of each iteration?

    Read the article

  • sqlite eatingup memory on iPhone when doing insert

    - by kviksilver
    I am having problem with inserting data to sqlite database. char *update="INSERT OR REPLACE INTO ct_subject (id,id_parent, title, description, link, address, phone, pos_lat, pos_long, no_votes, avg_vote, photo, id_comerc, id_city, placement, type, timestamp, mail) VALUES (?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?);"; sqlite3_stmt *stmt; if(sqlite3_prepare_v2(database, update, -1, &stmt, nil) == SQLITE_OK){ sqlite3_bind_int(stmt, 1, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"id"] intValue]); sqlite3_bind_int(stmt, 2, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"id_parent"] intValue]); sqlite3_bind_text(stmt, 3, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"title"] UTF8String], -1, NULL); sqlite3_bind_text(stmt, 4, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"description"] UTF8String], -1, NULL); sqlite3_bind_text(stmt, 5, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"link"] UTF8String], -1, NULL); sqlite3_bind_text(stmt, 6, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"address"] UTF8String], -1, NULL); sqlite3_bind_text(stmt, 7, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"phone"] UTF8String], -1, NULL); sqlite3_bind_text(stmt, 8, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"pos_lat"] UTF8String], -1, NULL); sqlite3_bind_text(stmt, 9, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"pos_long"] UTF8String], -1, NULL); sqlite3_bind_int(stmt, 10, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"no_votes"] intValue]); sqlite3_bind_text(stmt, 11, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"avg_vote"] UTF8String], -1, NULL); if ([[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"photo"] length]!=0) { NSMutableString *webUrl = (NSMutableString *)[[NSMutableString alloc] initWithString:@"http://www.crotune.com/public/images/subjects/"]; [webUrl appendString:[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"photo"]]; UIImage *myImage = [self getWebImage:webUrl]; if(myImage != nil){ sqlite3_bind_blob(stmt, 12, [UIImagePNGRepresentation(myImage) bytes], [UIImagePNGRepresentation(myImage) length], NULL); } else { sqlite3_bind_blob(stmt, 12, nil, -1, NULL); } [webUrl release]; [myImage release]; } else { sqlite3_bind_blob(stmt, 12, nil, -1, NULL); //NSLog(@" ne dodajem sliku2"); } sqlite3_bind_int(stmt, 13, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"id_comerc"] intValue]); sqlite3_bind_int(stmt, 14, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"id_city"] intValue]); sqlite3_bind_int(stmt, 15, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"placement"] intValue]); sqlite3_bind_int(stmt, 16, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"type"] intValue]); sqlite3_bind_int(stmt, 17, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"timestamp"] intValue]); sqlite3_bind_text(stmt, 18, [[[newCategories objectAtIndex:i] valueForKey:@"mail"] UTF8String], -1, NULL); } if (sqlite3_step(stmt) != SQLITE_DONE) { NSLog(@"%s", sqlite3_errmsg(database)); NSAssert1(0,@"nemogu updateat table %s", errorMsg); } else { NSLog(@"Ubacio %d",i); }sqlite3_finalize(stmt); What happens is that it starts to eat memory until it finaly quits... On memory warning i close and open database again, I have set cache size to 50 as mentioned in some posts here, and tried putting query into statement - same result.. it just garbles mamory and app quits after 300 inserts on iphone or somewhere around 900 inserts on iPad... Any help would be appreciated..

    Read the article

  • Main Memory Database with C++ Interface

    - by myahya
    I am looking for a main memory database with a C++ interface. I am looking for a database with a programmatic query interface and preferably one that works with native C++ types. SQLLite, for example, takes queries as string and needs to perform parsing ... which is time consuming. The operations I am looking for are: Creation of tables of arbitrary dimensions (number of attributes) capable of storing integer types. Support for insertion, deletion, selection, projection and (not a priority) joins.

    Read the article

  • How to create temporary files in memory visible for other process, using python

    - by LazyMiha
    Hello! I`m trying to write simple batch file generator in python. Batch file consist of about 30-50 lines of text and is passed to other applications. During the execution of script there a lot of calls to external applications. I want to create file in memory (like named pipes in win32). Is there any platform independ way? p.s. sorry for possible mistakes in text, I'm still learning English

    Read the article

  • Memory Leaks - C

    - by sbsp
    Hi guys, Is there a good application (that has some kind of gui) for testing memory leaks in c code. I would really like to test my assignment/programme but being very new to this, i struggle with using the terminal to do things, especially using gdb for debugging (to me it feels like a blast from the past, where i could be using some visual debugger). Thanks for the help

    Read the article

  • How much memory is my iphone app using (from Simulator)

    - by Jonathan
    I know this has something to do with Instruments, but well it's kind of confusing and searching for Instruments on Google doesn't help much. I'd like to know how well my app runs, like how much memory it uses. I just don't know where to find something like: "As close as we can tell from the simulator you'll app will currently be using xx MBs of RAM on a real iphone device." I need help on how to get this information.

    Read the article

  • Object in NSMutableArray crushed in memory

    - by Yoot
    Hi, I have some big problem with an NSMutableArray I'm filling with objects in a database. I'm using [appDelegate.myArray addObject:myObject], then somehow the object gets crushed in the memory, I don't know why, I didn't release anything... Thanks for your answers (and sorry for my poor english xD)

    Read the article

  • tomcat memory issue

    - by lalchand
    I am having more than 150 web applications in my tomcat web-apps directory can these be the one of the reason for increase in memory usage. i have installed tomcat as a service .

    Read the article

  • jQuery, .empty() and memory

    - by vandalo
    Hello, my application (ASP.NET MVC) shows a page which loads data constantly, at certain intervals. The jQuery script calls a controller and this one renders a different partial view, based on certain conditions. This partial view is the appended to the DOM with jQuery; previous elements are removed with the empty() method. I've realized that after one day the browser loads something like 600Mb of memory. What am I doing wrong? Thanks Alberto

    Read the article

  • Gzip In-Memory Compression

    - by feal87
    Quick and simple question. There are examples online about achieving in-memory gzip compression with zlib (C++) WITHOUT external libraries (like boost or such)? I just need to compress and decompress a block of data without much options. (it must be gzip as its the same format used by another mine C# program (the data is to be shared)) Tried to search to no avail... Thanks!

    Read the article

  • JVM memory management & garbage collection book?

    - by Max
    Hi. Could anyone advice a book (or any other source) that would thoroughly reveal internals of JVM memory management & garbage collection (optimization, work, circular references, pecularities, discussions for various JVM impls...)? [What I've found so far are separate articles devoted to various aspects but no weighty tome :). Some good materials for Hotspot implementation are here. ] Thanks a lot for any advice you give.

    Read the article

  • Rendering CALayer in context uses large amounts of memory

    - by Otium
    I am taking a snapshot of a UIWebView layer, but when I render the webview's layer in the current context my app uses 10mb more memory, and I don't think that should be right. Here is my current code: CGSize imageSize = self.bounds.size; UIGraphicsBeginImageContextWithOptions(imageSize, YES, 0); CGContextRef context = UIGraphicsGetCurrentContext(); [self.layer renderInContext:context]; _snapshot = UIGraphicsGetImageFromCurrentImageContext(); UIGraphicsEndImageContext();

    Read the article

  • Memory read/write access efficiency

    - by wolfPack88
    I've heard conflicting information from different sources, and I'm not really sure which one to believe. As such, I'll post what I understand and ask for corrections. Let's say I want to use a 2D matrix. There are three ways that I can do this (at least that I know of). 1: int i; char **matrix; matrix = malloc(50 * sizeof(char *)); for(i = 0; i < 50; i++) matrix[i] = malloc(50); 2: int i; int rowSize = 50; int pointerSize = 50 * sizeof(char *); int dataSize = 50 * 50; char **matrix; matrix = malloc(dataSize + pointerSize); char *pData = matrix + pointerSize - rowSize; for(i = 0; i < 50; i++) { pData += rowSize; matrix[i] = pData; } 3: //instead of accessing matrix[i][j] here, we would access matrix[i * 50 + j] char *matrix = malloc(50 * 50); In terms of memory usage, my understanding is that 3 is the most efficient, 2 is next, and 1 is least efficient, for the reasons below: 3: There is only one pointer and one allocation, and therefore, minimal overhead. 2: Once again, there is only one allocation, but there are now 51 pointers. This means there is 50 * sizeof(char *) more overhead. 1: There are 51 allocations and 51 pointers, causing the most overhead of all options. In terms of performance, once again my understanding is that 3 is the most efficient, 2 is next, and 1 is least efficient. Reasons being: 3: Only one memory access is needed. We will have to do a multiplication and an addition as opposed to two additions (as in the case of a pointer to a pointer), but memory access is slow enough that this doesn't matter. 2: We need two memory accesses; once to get a char *, and then to the appropriate char. Only two additions are performed here (once to get to the correct char * pointer from the original memory location, and once to get to the correct char variable from wherever the char * points to), so multiplication (which is slower than addition) is not required. However, on modern CPUs, multiplication is faster than memory access, so this point is moot. 1: Same issues as 2, but now the memory isn't contiguous. This causes cache misses and extra page table lookups, making it the least efficient of the lot. First and foremost: Is this correct? Second: Is there an option 4 that I am missing that would be even more efficient?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55  | Next Page >