Search Results

Search found 26908 results on 1077 pages for 'asynchronous wcf call'.

Page 49/1077 | < Previous Page | 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56  | Next Page >

  • Strange 401 (Unauthorized) when calling a WCF Service

    - by mipsen
    A WCF Service we call from BizTalk using WCF BasicHTTP usually works fine but all of a sudden it started returning 401 errors for some calls while others continued working as expected so it could not have been a "real" 401. The difference was the size of the message. One parameter of the service is a rather complex object. In the cases we got a 401 it got quite big (containing a lot of customer-data), say 5 MB. So we turned on tracking. The messages we traced out where about 20MB. Not too big for WCF one should suppose... A bit of research led us to increasing maxItemsInObjectGraph in the behaviours but that did not help. The service we call is in the same network as we are and is a WCF service. So we tried changing from BasicHTTP to net.tcp and Bingo! Ok, we had to use CustomBinding in BizTalk to set all the Quotas, etc. but it worked in the end.

    Read the article

  • Understanding WCF Hosting

     WCF is a flagship product from  Microsoft for developing distributed application using SOA. Prior to WCF   traditional ASMX Web services were hosted only on Internet Information Services (IIS). The hosting options for WCF services are significantly enhanced from ... [Read Full Article]

    Read the article

  • WCF Routing Service Filter Generator

    - by Michael Stephenson
    Recently I've been working with the WCF routing service and in our case we were simply routing based on the SOAP Action. This is a pretty good approach for a standard redirection of the message when all messages matching a SOAP Action will go to the same endpoint. Using the SOAP Action also lets you be specific about which methods you expose via the router. One of the things which was a pain was the number of routing rules I needed to create because we were routing for a lot of different methods. I could have explored the option of using a regular expression to match the message to its routing but I wanted to be very specific about what's routed and not risk exposing methods I shouldn't via the router. I decided to put together a little spreadsheet so that I can generate part of the configuration I would need to put in the configuration file rather than have to type this by hand. To show how this works download the spreadsheet from the following url: https://s3.amazonaws.com/CSCBlogSamples/WCF+Routing+Generator.xlsx In the spreadsheet you will see that the squares in green are the ones which you need to amend. In the below picture you can see that you specify a prefix and suffix for the filter name. The core namespace from the web service your generating routing rules for and the WCF endpoint name which you want to route to. In column A you will see the green cells where you add the list of method names which you want to include routing rules for. The spreadsheet will workout what the full SOAP Action would be then the name you will use for that filter in your WCF Routing filters. In column D the spreadsheet will have generated the XML snippet which you can add to the routing filters section in your configuration file. In column E the spreadsheet will have created the XML snippet which you can add to the routing table to send messages matching each filter to the appropriate WCF client endpoint to forward the message to the required destination. Hopefully you can see that with this spreadsheet it would be very easy to produce accurate XML for the WCF Routing configuration if you had a large number of routing rules. If you had additional methods in other services you can simply copy the worksheet and add multiple copies to the Excel workbook. One worksheet per service would work well.

    Read the article

  • How do I fire an asynchronous call in asp classic and ignore the response?

    - by Hexate
    Here's the gist: I have a call I want to make in asp, and I do not care about the response. I just want to fire the call and I do not want the page to wait for the response. According to the documentation, it should look something like this: dim xmlhttp : set xmlhttp = Server.CreateObject("MSXML2.ServerXMLHTTP") xmlhttp.Open "POST", url, true '' setting the 'asynchronous' option to 'true' xmlhttp.setRequestHeader "Content-Type", "application/soap+xml; charset=utf-8" xmlhttp.setRequestHeader "Content-Length", Len(XMLData) xmlhttp.send XMLData This works peachy when calling synchronously, but when I flip the ansynchronous option to 'true', nothing fires. What I can gather from the internet is that users do something like the following: While xmlhttp.readyState <> 4 xmlhttp.waitForResponse 1000 Wend Am I crazy in that this does not really seem like an asynchrous call anymore though if you are waiting for a response? putting the line xmlhttp.waitForResponse 1 right after the send will cause the request to fire, but again, I don't want to wait a second. Any thoughts?

    Read the article

  • What happens if an asynchronous delegate call never returns?

    - by RichardHowells
    I found a decent looking example of how to call a delegate asynchronously with a timeout... http://www.eggheadcafe.com/tutorials/aspnet/847c94bf-4b8d-4a66-9ae5-5b61f049019f/basics-make-any-method-c.aspx. In summary it uses WaitOne with a timeout to determine if the call does not return before the timeout expires. I also know that you should have an EndInvoke to match each BeginInvoke. So what happens if the wait timeout expires? We (presumably) DON'T want to call EndInvoke as that will block. The code can go on to do 'other things', but have we leaked anything? Is there some poor thread someplace blocked waiting for a return that's never going to happen? Have we leaked some memory where the result-that-will-never-return was going to be placed?

    Read the article

  • How to add multiple cookies to Response in WCF / REST service

    - by Sumtraveller
    I have access to WebOperationContext and can add one cookie by doing this: WebOperationContext.Current.OutgoingResponse.Headers.Add("Set-Cookie: foo_a=bar_a"); However if I call that several times, e.g.: WebOperationContext.Current.OutgoingResponse.Headers.Add("Set-Cookie: foo_a=bar_a"); WebOperationContext.Current.OutgoingResponse.Headers.Add("Set-Cookie: foo_b=bar_b"); I should get the following in my header (2 cookies): Set-Cookie: foo_a=bar_a Set-Cookie: foo_b=bar_b But instead get: Set-Cookie: foo_a=bar_a, foo_b=bar_b How do I set multiple cookies? Thx

    Read the article

  • Ambiguous function/constructor call in C#

    - by Ahmed Said
    The following code causes a compiler error, as it is ambiguous call but the problem if we use object instead of ArrayList no error happens and the string version works fine; Do you have an explanation for that? class A { public A(string x) { Console.WriteLine("string"); } public A(ArrayList x) { Console.WriteLine("ArrayList"); } } static void Main(string[] args) { A o = new A(null); }

    Read the article

  • making a phone call through asp.net web portal

    - by Prateek Singh
    Hi guys, my landline phone is connected to my computer. Now in my asp.net website there is a textbox and a button . i filled a telephone number in the textbox and on button click i want that a call get connected to the no. in the textbox through my landline phone. Is there any workaround for this in .net framework?? Thanks and best regards.... Prateek

    Read the article

  • User permission to make a call

    - by Denis Petau
    There might have been a restriction on originating (making) calls (voice or data) from mobile phones without an explicit user permission i.e. a window would pop-up, asking the user to press 'Yes'/approve or 'No'/cancel for a call attempt made by a software application on that cellphone/mobile. There seems though to exist API for making calls, voice calls and data calls, on various embedded OS like WM, Symbian and Android. Do they require a user button-press then?

    Read the article

  • wcf metadata service page url

    - by Neil B
    I have a service with the metadata exposed. Trouble is when I browse to the wsdl the service page it has the machine name as below: MasterLibrary Service You have created a service. To test this service, you will need to create a client and use it to call the service. You can do this using the svcutil.exe tool from the command line with the following syntax: svcutil.exe http://mymachine/Master/Master.svc?wsdl How do I make it show it as: http://www.url.co.uk/Master/Master.svc?wsdl

    Read the article

  • Weird exception in WCF server

    - by sevavladimirov
    Strange exception occurred, when I tried to call the action in my proxy class exception message: The message could not be processed because the action 'http://testservice//reports/IReportService//Report' is invalid or unrecognized.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56  | Next Page >