Search Results

Search found 5335 results on 214 pages for 'agile processes'.

Page 5/214 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• Building a life-critical System using Agile

  - by Ben Breen

  Looking at the general trend of comments in my question about Building an Aircraft using Agile, the biggest problem other than cost appears to be safety. Do people feel that it is not possible to build a safe system (or prove it is safe) using agile? Doesn’t all the iterative testing mitigate this? Is it likely that a piece of software developed using agile will never be as reliable as counterparts such as waterfall?

  Read the article

• How to deal with clients and iterations in Agile team?

  - by Ondrej Slinták

  This thread is a follow up to my previous one. It's in fact 2 questions, so I hope no one minds, as they are dependent on each other. We are starting a new project at work and we consider it as a great opportunity to try Agile techniques in action. We had a brainstorming about ideas we read in several books and articles, and came up with concept that would suit us the best: 2 weeks iteration, followed by call with clients who would choose what stuff they want to have in next iteration. I just have few more questions, which we couldn't figure out ourselves. What to do in the first iteration? What to, generally, do in the first few iterations if we start from the scratch? Just give it a month of development to code core of the application or start with simple wire-frames with limited pre-coded functionality? What usually clients want to see? Shiny stuff that doesn't work or ugly stuff that does work? How to communicate with clients? Our initial thought it to set the process to something like this: Is it a good idea to have a Focal Point on client side or is it better to communicate straight with all the clients to prevent miscommunication? Any thoughts are welcome! Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• L'excès de tests unitaires nuirait au développement agile, ils seraient favorisés par rapport aux tests d'intégration

  L'excès de tests unitaires nuirait au développement agile Ils seraient favorisés par rapport aux tests d'intégrationBien souvent, le développement agile mise sur le développement piloté par les tests (TDD). Aujourd'hui, Mark Balbes, un des membres les plus éminents de Asynchrony Solutions et expert en développement logiciel et en gestion de projet agile, nous livre sa vision des faits en ce qui concerne le TDD.L'expert estime qu'actuellement, le développement agile use excessivement du TDD, les...

  Read the article

• Apache+PHP problem: Cannot list processes other than apache's

  - by Satanowski

  I have a quite fresh install of the Apache (2.2.3/Centos) + PHP(5.1.6) and following problem: I need to monitor life of one process and in order to do that I run: $last_line = exec('ps -C snmpd'); and check its output. Unfortunately I always get nothing. I've checked it with other process names and it seems it can 'see' only Apache's processes. Any idea how to work this out?

  Read the article

• Is there a viable alternative to the agile development methodology? [closed]

  - by Eric Wilson

  The two predominant software-development methodologies are waterfall and agile. When discussing these two, there is often much focus on the particular practices that distinguish them (pair programming, TDD, etc. vs. functional spec, big up-front design, etc.) But the real differences are far deeper, in that these practices come from a philosophy. Waterfall says: Change is costly, so it should be minimized. Agile says: Change is inevitable, so make change cheap. My question is, regardless of what you think of TDD or functional specs, is the waterfall development methodology really viable? Does anyone really think that minimizing change in software is a viable option for those that desire to deliver valuable software? Or is the question really about what sort of practices work best in our situations to manage the inevitable change?

  Read the article

• How should I pitch moving to an agile/iterative development cycle with mandated 3-week deployments?

  - by Wayne M

  I'm part of a small team of four, and I'm the unofficial team lead (I'm lead in all but title, basically). We've largely been a "cowboy" environment, with no architecture or structure and everyone doing their own thing. Previously, our production deployments would be every few months without being on a set schedule, as things were added/removed to the task list of each developer. Recently, our CIO (semi-technical but not really a programmer) decided we will do deployments every three weeks; because of this I instantly thought that adopting an iterative development process (not necessarily full-blown Agile/XP, which would be a huge thing to convince everyone else to do) would go a long way towards helping manage expectations properly so there isn't this far-fetched idea that any new feature will be done in three weeks. IMO the biggest hurdle is that we don't have ANY kind of development approach in place right now (among other things like no CI or automated tests whatsoever). We don't even use Waterfall, we use "Tell Developer X to do a task, expect him to do everything and get it done". Are there any pointers that would help me start to ease us towards an iterative approach and A) Get the other developers on board with it and B) Get management to understand how iterative works? So far my idea involves trying to set up a CI server and get our build process automated (it takes about 10-20 minutes right now to simply build the application to put it on our development server), since pushing tests and/or TDD will be met with a LOT of resistance at this point, and constantly force us to break larger projects into smaller chunks that could be done iteratively in a three-week cycle; my only concern is that, unless I'm misunderstanding, an agile/iterative process may or may not release the software (depending on the project scope you might have "working" software after three weeks, but there isn't enough of it that works to let users make use of it), while I think the expectation here from management is that there will always be something "ready to go" in three weeks, and that disconnect could cause problems. On that note, is there any literature or references that explains the agile/iterative approach from a business standpoint? Everything I've seen only focuses on the developers, how to do it, but nothing seems to describe it from the perspective of actually getting the buy-in from the businesspeople.

  Read the article

• How agile methodologies can be applied in a typical " services " company?

  - by AlfaTeK

  My company is a custom software services company for external clientes, which means our typical project is one in which the contract already states the full budget of the project. Our typical project starts by defining requirements (improving the proposal high-level requirements), then we code the project, test it and ship it. We have an acceptance phase were the client tests the software and in that phase we can usually implement small changes asked by the client, or we charge extra for change requests. In some projects we have intermediate releases so the clients can check the progress of the project and give feedback on it. In summary: something like waterfall... I've followed the "agile" movement for a bit now and I always see it being a good match for a "product" company, or a company building software for an internal client. But are there good stories / advantages on using agile methods in my kind of company/projects? What are your experiences, what do you think about this?

  Read the article

• Which features of user story management should an agile team look for?

  - by Sonja Dimitrijevic

  In my research study, I need to identify the key features of user story management tools that can be used to support agile development. So far, I identified the following general groups of features: User role modeling and personas support, User stories and epics management, Acceptance testing support, High-level release planning, Low-level iteration planning, and Progress tracking. Each group contains some specific features, e.g., support for story points, writing of acceptance tests, etc. Which features of user story management should an agile team look for especially when switching from tangible tools (index cards, pin boards and big visible charts) to a software tool? Are some features more important than the others? Many thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• How can you plan long range resources and budgets when using Agile methodology?

  - by Mystere Man

  Agile does not encourage a lot of up-front design. This is good from a requirements management and software development standpoint, and allows the project to adapt to changing business needs. However, how does one do any long range planning of resources if you don't really know what you're going to build when you start? Oh sure, you have a conceptual model of what you're going to build, but you don't have any measurable detail from which to gague how many resources you will need to complete the project, or how much it will cost. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to go about long range planning in an agile environment?

  Read the article

• Can Agile/Scrum be used by 1 or 2 developers?

  - by Dillie-O

  Everything I've been reading and researching up to this point describes how Agile/Scrum works great with teams of about 4 to 6 members, maybe even more. In my current shop, we have about 8 developers or so, but given the nature of the volume of projects and the number of departments we support, we never have more than 1 or 2 folks assigned to a given project. Can I still use Agile/Scrum with a team of 1 or 2 developers? I'm working on making the pitch to my manager to start working with this methodology, but I need to be able to explain how to scale things back for a small developer crew, or convince them to make sure we get more members on a given project.

  Read the article

• Word 2010 creates multiple processes... sometimes

  - by Bill Sambrone

  I've run into a strange behavior when I migrated our users from Office 2007 / Vista to Office 2010 / Windows 7 (all 32-bit). They use a web based document management system called NetDocuments which stores all their .doc/.docx files. Generally, when they click on a doc from the browser window it fires up Word and opens the doc. Word has an add-in in it from NetDocs as well so it can upload the changed document directly back to the NetDocs server. I get a phone call when Word crashes, and every single time it has crashed I have witnessed multiple winword.exe processes running in task manager. I used process explorer to see what created the process, and it is all Internet Explorer. So far I have rolled them back to IE8 and the problem happens less frequently, but it still happens. When I try to duplicate the problem, I can make it happen sometimes if I open multiple documents very quickly. Using lightning fast alt-tab reflexes, I DO see that a 2nd WinWord process is created when a user clicks on a document, then it closes once the document is open. I think what is happening is that the secondary WinWord process that does some sort of NetDocs voodoo is getting stuck open. This behavior is new to Word 2010 / Windows 7 and google searching isn't coming up with much. I have seen a few posts that this is a known issue in certain circumstances and there is no "fix", but I thought it would good to ask others on this. Thanks!

  Read the article

• Erlang-style light-weight processes in .NET

  - by alexey

  Is there any way to implement Erlang-style light-weight processes in .NET? I found some projects that implement Erlang messaging model (actors model). For example, Axum. But I found nothing about light-weight processes implementation. I mean multiple processes that run in a context of a single OS-thread or OS-process.

  Read the article

• Windows and system processes

  - by jemper

  Note: I've asked this question in a similiar format on superuser but it seems like it may fit here on SO better. It definitely also is about programming as it concerns parts of the Win32 API, Windows in general and process management. So there are these processes that can't be terminated with taskkill - system processes in general. But there also is, for example my Anti Virus program that makes itself "unterminateable". How can I access and mainly terminate system processes under windows? (kill.exe by Microsoft doesn't work) How do processes like anti-virus programs protect themselves? How can you turn them off again, then?

  Read the article

• What is Agile Modeling and why do I need it?

  What is Agile Modeling and why do I need it? Agile Modeling is an add-on to existing agile methodologies like Extreme programming (XP) and Rational Unified Process (RUP). Agile Modeling enables developers to develop a customized software development process that actually meets their current development needs and is flexible enough to adjust in the future. According to Scott Ambler, Agile Modeling consists of five core values that enable this methodology to be effective and light weight Agile Modeling Core Values: Communication Simplicity Feedback Courage Humility Communication is a key component to any successful project. Open communication between stakeholder and the development team is essential when developing new applications or maintaining legacy systems. Agile models promote communication amongst software development teams and stakeholders. Furthermore, Agile Models provide a common understanding of an application for members of a software development team allowing them to have a universal common point of reference. The use of simplicity in Agile Models enables the exploration of new ideas and concepts through the use of basic diagrams instead of investing the time in writing tens or hundreds of lines of code. Feedback in regards to application development is essential. Feedback allows a development team to confirm that the development path is on track. Agile Models allow for quick feedback from shareholders because minimal to no technical expertise is required to understand basic models. Courage is important because you need to make important decisions and be able to change direction by either discarding or refactoring your work when some of your decisions prove inadequate, according to Scott Ambler. As a member of a development team, we must admit that we do not know everything even though some of us think we do. This is where humility comes in to play. Everyone is a knowledge expert in their own specific domain. If you need help with your finances then you would consult an accountant. If you have a problem or are in need of help with a topic why would someone not consult with a subject expert? An effective approach is to assume that everyone involved with your project has equal value and therefore should be treated with respect. Agile Model Characteristics: Purposeful Understandable Sufficiently Accurate Sufficiently Consistent Sufficiently Detailed Provide Positive Value Simple as Possible Just Fulfill Basic Requirements According to Scott Ambler, Agile models are the most effective possible because the time that is invested in the model is just enough effort to complete the job. Furthermore, if a model isn’t good enough yet then additional effort can be invested to get more value out of the model. However if a model is good enough, for the current needs, or surpass the current needs, then any additional work done on the model would be a waste. It is important to remember that good enough is in the eye of the beholder, so this can be tough. In order for Agile Models to work effectively Active Stakeholder need to participation in the modeling process. Finally it is also very important to model with others, this allows for additionally input ensuring that all the shareholders needs are reflected in the models. How can Agile Models be incorporated in to our projects? Agile Models can be incorporated in to our project during the requirement gathering and design phases. As requirements are gathered the models should be updated to incorporate the new project details as they are defined and updated. Additionally, the Agile Models created during the requirement phase can be the bases for the models created during the design phase.  It is important to only add to the model when the changes fit within the agile model characteristics and they do not over complicate the design.

  Read the article

• Software Metrics in Agile Methodologies

  - by geowa4

  Agile methodologies are rather prevalent these days, but I cannot seem to find much documentation on what metrics are most useful and why. I have found many more things saying that some traditional metrics like LOC and code coverage of tests are not appropriate, leaving two main questions: Why are those two (and other) metrics inappropriate? What metrics are best for Agile and why? Even with an Agile process, wouldn't you want to know how much code coverage you have with your unit tests? Or is it simply that this metric (and others) just are not as useful as other metrics like cyclomatic complexity and velocity?

  Read the article

• Can an internally developed fast evolving, agile, short sprint web application lend itself to offshoring?

  - by Gavin Howden

  I have recently been set a target to achieve readiness to successfully manage and deliver results through the usage of offshore teams on our mainline development project within 12 months. Our mainline is a multi-thousand user highly available web application, and various related SAAS components delivered through the above mentioned web application. We work agile on the mainline with a rapid 1 week sprint using continuous integration. Our delivery platform is a bespoke php framework, although we have some .net services and components in the mix. My view is: an offshore team could work if we either ship out an entire isolated project for offshore development, or we specify a component for our system in huge detail up front. But we don't currently work like that, and it will conflict with the in-house method, and unless the off-shore is working within our team, with our development/deployment chain it could be an integration nightmare. So my question is, given we have a closed source bespoke framework (Private IP) which we train our developers to use, and we work agile minimising documentation, maximising communication and responding to rapidly changing requirements, and much of the quality control is via team skills building and peer review, how can I make off-shoring work on our main line development?

  Read the article

• Who should be the architect in an agile project?

  - by woni

  We are developing the agile way for a few months now and I have some troubles understanding the agile manifesto as interpreted by my colleagues. The project we are developing is a framework for future projects and will be reused many times in the next years. Code is only written to fulfill the needs of the current user story. The product owner tells us what to do, but not how to do it. What would be right, in my opinion, because he is not implicitly a programmer. The project advanced and in my eyes it messed up a little bit. After I recognized an assembly that was responsible for 3 concerns (IoC-Container, communication layer and project internal things), I tried to address this to my colleagues. They answered that this would be the result of applying YAGNI, because know one told them to respect that functionalities have to be split up in different assemblies for further use. In my opinion no one has to tell us that we should respect the Separation of Concerns principle. On the other side, they mentioned to prefer YAGNI over SoC because it is less effort to implement and therefore faster and cheaper. We had changing requirements a lot at the beginning of the project and ended up in endless refactoring sessions, because to much has to be adapted. Is it better to make such rather simple design decisions up front, even there is no need in the current situation, or do we have to change a lot in the later progress of the project?

  Read the article

• I can't see how a mature agile team requires any *management*?

  - by ashy_32bit

  After a recent heated debate over Scrum, I realized my problem is that I think of management as a quite unnecessary and redundant activity in a fully agile team. I believe a mature Agile team does not require management or any non-technical decision making process of whatsoever. To my (apparently erring) eyes it is more than obvious that the only one suitable and capable of managing a mature development team is their coach (and that being the most technically competent colleague with proper communication skills). I can't imagine how a Scrum master can contribute to such a team. I am having a great difficulty realizing and understanding the value of such things as Scrum and manager as someone who is not a veteran developer but is well skilled in planning the production cycles when a coach exists in the team. What does that even mean? How on earth someone with no edge-skills of development can manage a highly technical team? Perhaps management here means something else? I see management as a total waste of time and a by-product of immaturity. In my understanding a mature team is fully self-managing. Apparently I'm mistaken since many great people say the contrary but I can't convince myself.

  Read the article

• Too many sleeping processes?

  - by user55859

  I'm running Debian Lenny (x86_64) on a cloud VPS (Xen) and top command tells me there are 210 processes running and 209 are sleeping: top - 14:49:29 up 15:18, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.11, 0.05 Tasks: 210 total, 1 running, 209 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 532288k total, 437316k used, 94972k free, 30584k buffers Swap: 1048568k total, 408k used, 1048160k free, 219772k cached And here is what ps aux command gives me: USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 1 0.0 0.1 10380 812 ? Ss Sep30 0:00 init [2] root 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kthreadd] root 3 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/0] root 4 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/0] root 5 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/0] root 6 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [khelper] root 7 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:05 [xenwatch] root 8 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:13 [xenbus] root 10 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/1] root 11 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/1] root 12 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/1] root 13 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/2] root 14 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/2] root 15 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/2] root 16 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/3] root 17 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/3] root 18 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/3] root 19 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/4] root 20 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/4] root 21 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/4] root 22 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/5] root 23 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/5] root 24 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/5] root 25 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/6] root 26 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/6] root 27 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/6] root 28 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/7] root 29 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/7] root 30 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/7] root 31 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/8] root 32 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/8] root 33 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/8] root 34 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/9] root 35 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/9] root 36 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/9] root 37 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/10] root 38 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/10] root 39 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:04 [events/10] root 40 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/11] root 41 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/11] root 42 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/11] root 43 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/12] root 44 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/12] root 45 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/12] root 46 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/13] root 47 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/13] root 48 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/13] root 49 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/14] root 50 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/14] root 51 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/14] root 52 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [migration/15] root 53 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [ksoftirqd/15] root 54 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [events/15] root 55 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/0] root 56 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/1] root 57 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/2] root 58 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/3] root 59 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/4] root 60 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/5] root 61 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/6] root 62 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/7] root 63 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/8] root 64 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/9] root 65 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/10] root 66 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/11] root 67 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/12] root 68 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/13] root 69 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/14] root 70 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kintegrityd/15] root 71 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/0] root 72 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/1] root 73 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/2] root 74 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/3] root 75 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/4] root 76 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/5] root 77 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/6] root 78 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/7] root 79 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/8] root 80 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/9] root 81 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/10] root 82 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/11] root 83 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/12] root 84 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/13] root 85 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/14] root 86 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kblockd/15] root 87 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [cqueue] root 88 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kseriod] root 89 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Sep30 0:00 [pdflush] root 90 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Sep30 0:00 [pdflush] root 91 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kswapd0] root 92 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/0] root 93 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/1] root 94 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/2] root 95 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/3] root 96 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/4] root 97 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/5] root 98 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/6] root 99 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/7] root 100 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/8] root 101 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/9] root 102 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/10] root 103 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/11] root 104 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/12] root 105 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/13] root 106 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/14] root 107 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [aio/15] root 108 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kpsmoused] root 167 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/0] root 168 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/1] root 169 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/2] root 170 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/3] root 171 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/4] root 172 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/5] root 173 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/6] root 174 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/7] root 175 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/8] root 176 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/9] root 177 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/10] root 178 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/11] root 179 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/12] root 180 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/13] root 181 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/14] root 182 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [net_accel/15] root 315 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfs_mru_cache] root 316 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/0] root 317 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/1] root 318 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/2] root 319 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/3] root 320 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/4] root 321 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/5] root 322 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/6] root 323 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/7] root 324 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/8] root 325 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/9] root 326 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/10] root 327 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/11] root 328 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/12] root 329 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/13] root 330 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/14] root 331 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfslogd/15] root 332 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/0] root 333 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/1] root 334 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/2] root 335 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/3] root 336 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/4] root 337 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/5] root 338 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/6] root 339 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/7] root 340 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/8] root 341 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/9] root 342 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/10] root 343 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/11] root 344 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/12] root 345 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/13] root 346 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/14] root 347 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [xfsdatad/15] root 399 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsIO] root 400 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 401 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 402 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 403 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 404 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 405 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 406 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 407 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 408 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 409 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 410 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 411 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 412 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 413 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 414 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 415 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 416 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [jfsSync] root 673 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Sep30 0:00 [kjournald] root 727 0.0 0.1 16840 960 ? S<s Sep30 0:00 udevd --daemon root 1273 0.0 0.3 122036 2016 ? Sl Sep30 0:00 /usr/sbin/rsyslogd -c3 root 1306 0.0 0.2 48960 1224 ? Ss Sep30 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd root 1809 0.0 0.2 21276 1076 ? Ss Sep30 0:00 /usr/sbin/cron root 1873 0.0 1.5 41460 8360 ? Ss Sep30 0:02 /usr/sbin/munin-node root 1896 0.0 0.1 3864 608 tty1 Ss+ Sep30 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty1 root 1897 0.0 0.1 3864 604 tty2 Ss+ Sep30 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty2 root 1898 0.0 0.1 3864 604 tty3 Ss+ Sep30 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty3 root 1899 0.0 0.1 3864 608 tty4 Ss+ Sep30 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty4 root 1900 0.0 0.1 3864 608 tty5 Ss+ Sep30 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty5 root 1901 0.0 0.1 3864 604 tty6 Ss+ Sep30 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty6 101 4526 0.0 0.1 42820 1052 ? Ss 12:27 0:00 /usr/sbin/exim4 -bd -q30m root 8865 0.0 0.2 11668 1432 pts/0 S 13:18 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/bin/mysqld_safe mysql 8980 0.0 9.0 175284 48368 pts/0 Sl 13:18 0:05 /usr/sbin/mysqld --basedir=/usr --datadir=/var/lib/mysql --user=mysql --pid-file=/var/run/my root 8981 0.0 0.1 6480 684 pts/0 S 13:18 0:00 logger -t mysqld -p daemon.error root 13730 0.0 0.8 149144 4712 ? Ss 14:05 0:00 /usr/bin/php5-fpm --fpm-config /etc/php5/fpm/php5-fpm.conf www-data 13731 0.2 11.4 172756 61136 ? S 14:05 0:05 /usr/bin/php5-fpm --fpm-config /etc/php5/fpm/php5-fpm.conf www-data 13732 0.2 8.9 158516 47712 ? S 14:05 0:05 /usr/bin/php5-fpm --fpm-config /etc/php5/fpm/php5-fpm.conf www-data 13733 0.1 8.1 156576 43468 ? S 14:05 0:04 /usr/bin/php5-fpm --fpm-config /etc/php5/fpm/php5-fpm.conf root 14601 0.0 0.2 30600 1240 ? Ss 14:15 0:00 nginx: master process /usr/sbin/nginx www-data 14602 0.0 0.3 30976 1836 ? S 14:15 0:00 nginx: worker process www-data 14603 0.0 0.3 30976 1836 ? S 14:15 0:00 nginx: worker process www-data 14604 0.0 0.5 31552 2852 ? S 14:15 0:00 nginx: worker process www-data 14605 0.0 0.4 31240 2580 ? S 14:15 0:00 nginx: worker process www-data 14606 0.0 0.3 30976 1836 ? S 14:15 0:00 nginx: worker process www-data 14607 0.0 0.3 30976 1836 ? S 14:15 0:00 nginx: worker process www-data 14608 0.0 0.4 31244 2536 ? S 14:15 0:00 nginx: worker process www-data 14609 0.0 0.5 31544 2788 ? S 14:15 0:00 nginx: worker process root 17169 0.0 0.2 17456 1160 pts/0 R+ 14:45 0:00 ps aux root 26391 0.0 0.6 66168 3284 ? Ss 10:32 0:00 sshd: root@notty root 26394 0.0 0.3 42376 2120 ? Ss 10:32 0:00 /usr/lib/openssh/sftp-server root 31500 0.0 0.6 66140 3248 ? Ss 11:33 0:00 sshd: root@pts/0 root 31503 0.0 0.3 20248 1924 pts/0 Ss 11:33 0:00 -bash root 31509 0.0 0.6 66168 3264 ? Ss 11:34 0:00 sshd: root@notty root 31512 0.0 0.3 42180 1984 ? Ss 11:34 0:00 /usr/lib/openssh/sftp-server I'm wondering if this is normal situation? Do I need all of those process? Thanks for any suggestions!

  Read the article

• Agile Whiteboard Software

  - by PaddyC

  Can anyone recommend decent software that could replace a physical whiteboard, as used in Agile development? I've had a look at http://www.brightgreenprojects.com/ but ideally we'd like something we could host ourselves. We use Jira for issue tracking, and are looking at integrating GreenHopper for project management at the moment. The general feeling among users so far seems to be that GreenHopper is a little clunky. Is there a more straight-forward agile whiteboard software tool out there?

  Read the article

• Planning a requirements gathering session using Agile

  - by Dave Smith

  We are planning on introducing Agile into our development process (a shift from the waterfall we've been using so far). We are leaning towards a hybrid model in whcih the requirements gathering session is comprised of a business analyst, subject matter experts, technical person and a user interface person. The plan is to create user stories that the development team can use in their agile process with 1 month sprints. Has anyone had experience with a hybrid model? How has it worked for you so far?

  Read the article

• Only allow certain processes to connect to MS SQL

  - by Fred

  I've lost the source code for a very old application that connects to a MS SQL-server for some SQL queries. Since the login is hard-coded in the application I can't change the username/password on the server. One day the password will probably be known to the users and we surely need to change it. But how? One idea is to only allow the old application to do the queries on the SQL server and block out any other application like the query analyzer etc. Can I set process permission somehow? The SQL server (MS SQL 2005) and application (C++) are on the same machine It's too costly to rewrite the old program Thanks for help!

  Read the article

• Launching a process on startup in ubuntu fails to start other processes

  - by whatWhat

  On Ubuntu Server I've written a c++ program which launches another process which is in python. The c++ process runs fine on startup but the python process never launches. It gets created and when I run "top" I can see that both process's are running but next to the one that says python it reads python defunct. I've created the startup script in /etc/init.d and updated rc.d. Is there something else I have to do in order for it to see the python application?

  Read the article

• How to make Processes Run Parallel in Erlang?

  - by Ankit S

  Hello, startTrains() -> TotalDist = 100, Trains = [trainA,trainB ], PID = spawn(fun() -> train(1,length(Trains)) end), [ PID ! {self(),TrainData,TotalDist} || TrainData <- Trains], receive {_From, Mesg} -> error_logger:info_msg("~n Mesg ~p ~n",[Mesg]) after 10500 -> refresh end. so, I created Two Processes named trainA, trainB. I want to increment these process by 5 till it gets 100. I made different processes to make each of the train (process) increments its position parallely. But I was surprised to get the output sequentially i.e process trainA ends then process trainB starts. But I want to increment themselves at simultaneously. I want to run processes like this trainA 10 trainB 0 trainA 15 trainB 5 .... trainA 100 trainB 100 but I m getting trainA 0 .... trainA 90 trainA 95 trainA 100 trainA ends trainB 0 trainB 5 trainB 10 ..... trainB 100 How to make the processes run parallel/simultaneously? Hope you get my Q's. Please help me.

  Read the article

• How to terminate all [grand]child processes using C# on WXP (and newer MSWindows)

  - by NVRAM

  Question: How can I determine all processes in the child's Process Tree to kill them? I have an application, written in C# that will: Get a set of data from the server, Spawn a 3rd party utility to process the data, then Return the results to the server. This is working fine. But since a run consumes a lot of CPU and may take as long as an hour, I want to add the ability to have my app terminate its child processes. Some issues that make the simple solutions I've found elsewhere are: My app's child process "A" (InstallAnywhere EXE I think) spawns the real processing app "B" (a java.exe), which in turns spawns more children "C1".."Cn" (most of which are also written in Java). There will likely be multiple copies of my application (and hence, multiple sets of its children) running on the same machine. The child process is not in my control so there might be some "D" processes in the future. My application must run on 32-bit and 64-bit versions of MSWindows. On the plus side there is no issue of data loss, a "clean" shutdown doesn't matter as long as the processes end fairly quickly.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >