Search Results

Search found 448 results on 18 pages for 'memcached'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 5/18 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • How to debug memcached "SERVER HAS FAILED AND IS DISABLED UNTIL TIMED RETRY" errors?

    - by Jevgenij Evll
    I have a two server memcached setup. When memcached write fails, I receive an email notification. About once per day "SERVER HAS FAILED AND IS DISABLED UNTIL TIMED RETRY" error comes and I have no idea how to find the reason. I am using PHP Memcached client. I am not using too long keys. I tried adding -v flag, but it does not help, the log remains empty. If I include output of getStats to the error notification, I receive the following info: Array ( [192.168.0.3:11211] => Array ( [pid] => 28167 [uptime] => 3671962 [threads] => 4 [time] => 1358714713 [pointer_size] => 64 [rusage_user_seconds] => 24516 [rusage_user_microseconds] => 130981 [rusage_system_seconds] => 86246 [rusage_system_microseconds] => 675512 [curr_items] => 1616352 [total_items] => 118339822 [limit_maxbytes] => 2684354560 [curr_connections] => 8 [total_connections] => 78108681 [connection_structures] => 356 [bytes] => 981522779 [cmd_get] => 1561752945 [cmd_set] => 158718324 [get_hits] => 1383072575 [get_misses] => 178680370 [evictions] => 0 [bytes_read] => 138113231690 [bytes_written] => 1091741700765 [version] => 1.4.15 ) [192.168.0.4:11211] => Array ( [pid] => -1 [uptime] => 0 [threads] => 0 [time] => 0 [pointer_size] => 0 [rusage_user_seconds] => 0 [rusage_user_microseconds] => 0 [rusage_system_seconds] => 0 [rusage_system_microseconds] => 0 [curr_items] => 0 [total_items] => 0 [limit_maxbytes] => 0 [curr_connections] => 0 [total_connections] => 0 [connection_structures] => 0 [bytes] => 0 [cmd_get] => 0 [cmd_set] => 0 [get_hits] => 0 [get_misses] => 0 [evictions] => 0 [bytes_read] => 0 [bytes_written] => 0 [version] => ) )

    Read the article

  • In Nginx, can I handle both a location:url or a content-type: text/html response from memcached?

    - by Sean Foo
    I'm setting up an nginx - apache reverse proxy where nginx handles the static files and apache the dynamic. I have a search engine and depending on search parameter I either directly forward the user to the page they are looking for or provide a set of search results. I cache these results in memcached as key:/search.cgi?q=foo value: LOCATION:http://www.example.com/foo.html and key:/search.cgi?q=bar value: CONTENT-TYPE: text/html <html> .... .... </html> I can pull the "Content-type...." values out of memcached using nginx and send them to the user, but I can't quite figure out how to handle a returned value like "Location..." Can I?

    Read the article

  • PHP on several servers with session-sharing

    - by Etu
    there's certanly other threads about this, but I have one more question. We are about to scale the website at work to have more than one server. And we need to share the sessions between the servers. We have been looking into different solutions, one in memcached and use Memcached as sessionhandler in PHP. That will probably work. And the idea would be to run memcached on every machine and let all webservers access all other servers memcached servers, and then we have shared sessions between the machines, yay. (we have no resources to setup with sticky-sessions yet, that's a later project. we need this running, and we need this running now. and we will loadbalance with DNS for a starter) But then... If I want to take one server down, say, for maintenance, or a server crashes, or whatever reason. I don't want the users to just loose their sessions and have to start from the beginning... That's why we need some kind of replication, which Memcached does not support. Then I found http://repcached.lab.klab.org/ -- which has multi-master replication of memcached, which is great, and is what I want. But does it work with 2 machines? Say 3, 5, 10? For future scaling. I also looked into redishttp://redis.io/ -- which also seems great, but is a bit more "shaky" with the php-session-handler support, and no multi-master-replication. The thing is that I like to use memcached, but I want to be able to power down one of two boxes without loosing half of the sessions. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Why would memcached refuse to store data with some keys ?

    - by Pierre
    Hello, I use the memcache extension for python, and I have a very strange problem. Memcached refuses to store the exact same data with some keys, and succeeds in caching some others. >>> conn.set('138b9c95d693760840aab85ee5591d2', 'test'); True >>> conn.set('138b9c95d693760840aab85ee5591d3', 'test'); 0 >>> conn.set('138b9c95d693760840aab85ee5591d4', 'test'); True >>> conn.set('138b9c95d693760840aab85ee5591d5', 'test'); 0 >>> conn.set('138b9c95d693760840aab85ee5591d6', 'test'); True >>> conn.set('138b9c95d693760840aab85ee5591d7', 'test'); 0 >>> conn.set('138b9c95d693760840aab85ee5591d8', 'test'); True >>> conn.set('138b9c95d693760840aab85ee5591d9', 'test'); True >>> conn.set('138b9c95d693760840aab85ee5591e0', 'test'); True >>> conn.set('138b9c95d693760840aab85ee5591e1', 'test'); True I don't really understand. I should add that I use the version 1.40 of the memcache module with memcached 1.2.8 running on Ubuntu Server 9.10. I restarted the memcached daemon, same result, with the same keys. Thanks. Update: I upgraded memcached to version 1.4.2, packaged on lucid repos, with the exact same result.

    Read the article

  • memcached vs. internal caching in PHP?

    - by waitinforatrain
    Hey, I'm working on some old(ish) software in PHP that maintains a $cache array to reduce the number of SQL queries. I was thinking of just putting memcached in its place and I'm wondering whether or not to get rid of the internal caching. Would there still be a worthwihle performance increase if I keep the internal caching, or would memcached suffice?

    Read the article

  • Solutions for "Maintenance Mode"

    - by Ka Lyse
    Given a web application running across 10+ servers, what techniques have you put in place for doing things like altering the state of your website so that you can implement certain features. For instance, you might want to: Restrict Logins/Disable Certain Features Turn Site to "Read Only" Turn Site to Single "Maintenance Mode" page. Doing any of the above is pretty trivial. You can throw a particular "flag" in an .ini file, or add a row/value to a site_options table in your database and just read that value and do the appropriate thing. But these solutions have their problems. Disadvantages/Problems For instance, if you use a file for your application, and you want to switch off a certain feature temporarily, then you need to update this file on all servers. So then you might want to look at running something like ZooKeeper, but you are probably overcomplicating things. So then, you might decide that you want to store these "feature" flags in a database. But then you are obviously adding unncessary queries to each page request. So you think to yourself, that you will throw memcached in to the mix and just cache the query. Then you just retrieve all of your "Features" from memcached and add a 2ms~ latency to your application on every page. So to get around this, you decide to use a two tier-cache system, whereby you use an inmemory cache on each machine, (like Apc/Redis etc). This would work, but then it gets complicated, because you would have to set the key/hash life to perhaps 60 seconds, so that when you purge/invalidate the memcached object storing your "Features" result, your on machine cache is prompt enough to get the the new states. What suggestions might you have? Keeping in mind that optimization/efficiency is the priority here.

    Read the article

  • How do you work around memcached's key/value limitations?

    - by mjy
    Memcached has length limitations for keys (250?) and values (roughtly 1MB), as well as some (to my knowledge) not very well defined character restrictions for keys. What is the best way to work around those in your opinion? I use the Perl API Cache::Memcached. What I do currently is store a special string for the main key's value if the original value was too big ("parts:<number") and in that case, I store <number parts with keys named 1+<main key, 2+<main key etc.. This seems "OK" (but messy) for some cases, not so good for others and it has the intrinsic problem that some of the parts might be missing at any time (so space is wasted for keeping the others and time is wasted reading them). As for the key limitations, one could probably implement hashing and store the full key (to work around collisions) in the value, but I haven't needed to do this yet. Has anyone come up with a more elegant way, or even a Perl API that handles arbitrary data sizes (and key values) transparently? Has anyone hacked the memcached server to support arbitrary keys/values?

    Read the article

  • Configuring SASL support in libmemcached

    - by John Keyes
    I'm trying to build libmemcached with SASL support on OS X Mountain Lion. I have built memcached (1.4.15) with SASL support: $ memcached -S -vv Initialized SASL. slab class 1: chunk size 96 perslab 10922 ... slab class 42: chunk size 1048576 perslab 1 <17 server listening (binary) <18 server listening (binary) <19 send buffer was 9216, now 3728270 <20 send buffer was 9216, now 3728270 <19 server listening (udp) <20 server listening (udp) ... I am trying to build libmemcached with SASL support too. I have tried the following: $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local \ --with-memcached-sasl=/usr/local/bin/memcached ... $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local \ --with-memcached-sasl="/usr/local/bin/memcached -S" ... But the resulting configuration summary is the same for both: Configuration summary for libmemcached version 1.0.11 * Installation prefix: /usr/local * System type: apple-darwin12.2.0 * Host CPU: x86_64 * C Compiler: i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2336.11.00) * C Flags: -O2 -Werror -Wall -Wextra -std=c99 -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Woverride-init * C++ Compiler: i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-g++-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2336.11.00) * C++ Flags: -O2 -Werror -Wall -Wextra -Wpragmas -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Waddress -Wchar-subscripts -Wcomment -Wctor-dtor-privacy -Wfloat-equal -Wformat=2 -Wmissing-field-initializers -Wmissing-noreturn -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wnormalized=id -Woverloaded-virtual -Wpointer-arith -Wredundant-decls -Wshadow -Wshorten-64-to-32 -Wsign-compare -Wstrict-overflow=1 -Wswitch-enum -Wundef -Wunused-variable -Wwrite-strings -fwrapv -ggdb * CPP Flags: -I/usr/local/include * Assertions enabled: no * Debug enabled: no * Warnings as failure: no * SASL support: Am I doing something incorrectly? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • 100,000 complex structures that are accessed frequently by 100,000 users

    - by Saad
    If you are required to store 100,000 complex structures that are accessed frequently by 100,000 users, which of the following solutions would you use and why? Memcached, In-code python objects, Redis, or a relational database (MySQL). With the little knowledge that I have I think that memcached and In-code python object will not store permanent persistent data. so they don't qualify as the right answer for such a problem. And for complex data structures its best to use Redis. Please correct me if I am wrong.

    Read the article

  • Memcached server: Is it a good practice to point two server urls to the same server?

    - by Niro
    I have a system where there are connections to a memcache server from several different files and servers. I would like to stay with one server but keep the option of increasing the number of memcache servers (for periods of of high traffic). My idea is to tell memcache there are two servers, while the two urls will point (by DNS) to a single server. In the future if I want I can add a server and change DNS without changing the code in many places. Is this a good practice? Is there a performance cost to the fact that there are two server connections but they both point to the same server? Any other idea how to achive instant expeandability of memcache capacity without need to change the code and deploy ?

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu package question

    - by Industrial
    Hi everyone, I run Ubuntu, and If i type the following in a terminal, I start a new instance of memcached, right? # memcached -vv How can I target the the current instance of memcached in terminal? It would help me to see the very-verbose mode on my already running instance. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Is memcached a dinosaur in comparison to Redis?

    - by Industrial
    Hi everyone, I have worked quite a bit with memcached the last weeks and just found out about Redis. When I read this part of their readme, I suddenly got a warm, cozy feeling in my stomach: Redis can be used as a memcached on steroids because is as fast as memcached but with a number of features more. Like memcached, Redis also supports setting timeouts to keys so that this key will be automatically removed when a given amount of time passes. This sounds amazing. I'd also found this page with benchmarks: http://www.ruturaj.net/redis-memcached-tokyo-tyrant-mysql-comparison So, honestly - Is memcache really that old dinousaur that is a bad choice from a performance perspective when compared to this newcomer called Redis? I haven't heard lot about Redis previously, thereby the approach for my question!

    Read the article

  • Are memcached entries saved by the Danga client compatible with the Spy client?

    - by jigjig
    After saving a String value into memcached using the Danga client, I attempted to get the entry using the Spy client. The two String values are not the same. The Danga client retrieves a string with an additional empty char prepended to the string, therefore violating the equality condition. Danga: t,e,s,t,s,t,r,i,n,g Spy: ,t,e,s,t,s,t,r,i,n,g I also attempted to save a serialized Map using the Danga client and get the Map using the Spy client. The Spy client is able to only get a String form of the Map. The string contains binary values, as below: sr

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >