Search Results

Search found 99046 results on 3962 pages for 'sql server cluster'.

Page 50/3962 | < Previous Page | 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57  | Next Page >

  • Whether to use UNION or OR in SQL Server Queries

    - by Dinesh Asanka
    Recently I came across with an article on DB2 about using Union instead of OR. So I thought of carrying out a research on SQL Server on what scenarios UNION is optimal in and which scenarios OR would be best. I will analyze this with a few scenarios using samples taken  from the AdventureWorks database Sales.SalesOrderDetail table. Scenario 1: Selecting all columns So we are going to select all columns and you have a non-clustered index on the ProductID column. --Query 1 : OR SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 714 OR ProductID =709 OR ProductID =998 OR ProductID =875 OR ProductID =976 OR ProductID =874 --Query 2 : UNION SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 714 UNION SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 709 UNION SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 998 UNION SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 875 UNION SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 976 UNION SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 874 So query 1 is using OR and the later is using UNION. Let us analyze the execution plans for these queries. Query 1 Query 2 As expected Query 1 will use Clustered Index Scan but Query 2, uses all sorts of things. In this case, since it is using multiple CPUs you might have CX_PACKET waits as well. Let’s look at the profiler results for these two queries: CPU Reads Duration Row Counts OR 78 1252 389 3854 UNION 250 7495 660 3854 You can see from the above table the UNION query is not performing well as the  OR query though both are retuning same no of rows (3854).These results indicate that, for the above scenario UNION should be used. Scenario 2: Non-Clustered and Clustered Index Columns only --Query 1 : OR SELECT ProductID,SalesOrderID, SalesOrderDetailID FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 714 OR ProductID =709 OR ProductID =998 OR ProductID =875 OR ProductID =976 OR ProductID =874 GO --Query 2 : UNION SELECT ProductID,SalesOrderID, SalesOrderDetailID FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 714 UNION SELECT ProductID,SalesOrderID, SalesOrderDetailID FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 709 UNION SELECT ProductID,SalesOrderID, SalesOrderDetailID FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 998 UNION SELECT ProductID,SalesOrderID, SalesOrderDetailID FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 875 UNION SELECT ProductID,SalesOrderID, SalesOrderDetailID FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 976 UNION SELECT ProductID,SalesOrderID, SalesOrderDetailID FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 874 GO So this time, we will be selecting only index columns, which means these queries will avoid a data page lookup. As in the previous case we will analyze the execution plans: Query 1 Query 2 Again, Query 2 is more complex than Query 1. Let us look at the profile analysis: CPU Reads Duration Row Counts OR 0 24 208 3854 UNION 0 38 193 3854 In this analyzis, there is only slight difference between OR and UNION. Scenario 3: Selecting all columns for different fields Up to now, we were using only one column (ProductID) in the where clause.  What if we have two columns for where clauses and let us assume both are covered by non-clustered indexes? --Query 1 : OR SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 714 OR CarrierTrackingNumber LIKE 'D0B8%' --Query 2 : UNION SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 714 UNION SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE CarrierTrackingNumber  LIKE 'D0B8%' Query 1 Query 2: As we can see, the query plan for the second query has improved. Let us see the profiler results. CPU Reads Duration Row Counts OR 47 1278 443 1228 UNION 31 1334 400 1228 So in this case too, there is little difference between OR and UNION. Scenario 4: Selecting Clustered index columns for different fields Now let us go only with clustered indexes: --Query 1 : OR SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 714 OR CarrierTrackingNumber LIKE 'D0B8%' --Query 2 : UNION SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE ProductID = 714 UNION SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderDetail WHERE CarrierTrackingNumber  LIKE 'D0B8%' Query 1 Query 2 Now both execution plans are almost identical except is an additional Stream Aggregate is used in the first query. This means UNION has advantage over OR in this scenario. Let us see profiler results for these queries again. CPU Reads Duration Row Counts OR 0 319 366 1228 UNION 0 50 193 1228 Now see the differences, in this scenario UNION has somewhat of an advantage over OR. Conclusion Using UNION or OR depends on the scenario you are faced with. So you need to do your analyzing before selecting the appropriate method. Also, above the four scenarios are not all an exhaustive list of scenarios, I selected those for the broad description purposes only.

    Read the article

  • Solaris 11 ???! Oracle Solaris Cluster 4.0

    - by user12798668
    2011 ? 11 ? 9 ??????? Oracle Solaris 11 ????2011 ? 12 ? 6 ??Oracle Solaris 11 ????? Oracle Solaris Cluster 4.0 ??????????? Oracle Solaris Cluster ? Solaris ?????????????????????Sun ??? Sun Cluster ???????????? ????????Oracle Solaris Cluster ????????????????????? Oracle ?????????????????????????Oracle Solaris Cluster ?????????????????????????????????????????Oracle Solaris Cluster ???????????????????????????·??????? Geographic Edition ??????????????????? Solaris 10 ???????? Oracle Solaris Cluster ? 3.3 5/11 (Update 1) ????Solaris 11 ??????????? 4.0 ???????????Oracle Solaris Cluster 4.0 ??????????????? Solaris 11 IPS / AI ????? Solaris ????? (Solaris Zones, Oracle VM Server for SPARC) ????? Oracle Solaris Cluster Geographic Edition ????????·??????????? Oracle Solaris Cluster ??????????????????????????????Oracle Solaris Cluster ???????? Solaris ??????????????????Solaris ???????? Solaris Cluster ????????????????????????? Solaris 11 ???Solaris ???????? IPS ? ????????????? Solaris 11 ?????Oracle OpenWorld Tokyo 2012 ?????? 4/6(?) ????????????49 ????? Oracle Develop ?????????????? 4/6(?) D3-03 ?Oracle Solaris 11??????????????????(13:00 - 13:45) 4/6(?) D3-13 ??????????????????? Oracle Database?SPARC/Solaris???????????????????????? (14:00 - 14:45) 4/6(?) S2-53 ?Oracle Solaris 11 ??????????????-IPS ????????(16:00 - 17:30) ???????????!! (Oracle Develop ? Solaris ??????????????????????????????????) Oracle OpenWorld Tokyo 2012 ???? URL http://www.oracle.com/openworld/jp-ja/index.html ?????? 7264 ???????????????

    Read the article

  • ?12c????RAC Cluster Hub Node-Leaf Node

    - by Liu Maclean(???)
    ?12c?cluster?????????????,?????????????flex cluster?flux asm?? ??Hub Node?Leaf Node,?????Hub Node?Leaf Node. Hub Node????: A node in and Oracle Flex Cluster that is tightly connected with other servers and has direct access to a shared disk. Leaf Node????: Servers that are loosely coupled with Hub Nodes, which may not have direct access to the shared storage. ?????????? Leaf Node??????shared storage ,????leaf node??share disk?? ??Hub Node?12c?????cluster node???, ?Leaf Node????? Leaf Node???: ? Hub Node?? ?????cluster?? ????????Hub Node ????Hub Node????? Hub Node????????????Leaf Node??? ??????????? ?Hub Node????? ??Leaf Node??Flex Cluster???????: hub-and-spoke???cluster?????????? ????Hub Node????OCR?Votedisk ????HUB node???,???????clusterware?????,??ocr?Votedisk ? ?????????????? ??????????,???????? ????????,12???Flex cluster??12?????, ???????? [ n * (n-1)]/2?66?????? ???1000?????,?????????????40?Hub Node,???Hub Node??24?Leaf Node,?Flex Cluster???1740??????  ????,??Cluster??499500?????? ?Flex Cluster??????????????,??cluster software????? ??Hub Node ?? ????????? , ??????????relocate???Hub Node ?Hub Node???Leaf Node??????,????????relocate???Leaf Node? ??Leaf Node?? ?????????,????????relocate????Leaf Node?

    Read the article

  • An XEvent a Day (13 of 31) – The system_health Session

    - by Jonathan Kehayias
    Today’s post was originally planned for this coming weekend, but seems I’ve caught whatever bug my kids had over the weekend so I am changing up today’s blog post with one that is easier to cover and shorter.  If you’ve been running some of the queries from the posts in this series, you have no doubt come across an Event Session running on your server with the name of system_health.  In today’s post I’ll go over this session and provide links to references related to it. When Extended Events...(read more)

    Read the article

  • An XEvent a Day (6 of 31) – Targets Week – asynchronous_file_target

    - by Jonathan Kehayias
    Yesterday’s post, Targets Week - ring_buffer , looked at the ring_buffer Target in Extended Events and how it outputs the raw Event data in an XML document.  Today I’m going to go over the details of the other Target in Extended Events that captures raw Event data, the asynchronous_file_target. What is the asynchronous_file_target? The asynchronous_file_target holds the raw format Event data in a proprietary binary file format that persists beyond server restarts and can be provided to another...(read more)

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2008 to Sybase Linked Server (x64) -- Provider and permissions issues

    - by Cory Larson
    Good morning, We're testing a new SQL Server 2008 setup (64-bit) and one of our requirements was to get a linked server up and talking to a Sybase database. We've successfully done so using Sybase's 64-bit 15.5 drivers, however I can't expand the catalog list from a remote machine (connecting to the '08 box with SSMS) without having my network account being added as an Administrator on the actual box and then using Windows Authentication to connect to the server instance. This is going to be problematic when we go live. Has anybody experienced this, or have any input on the permissions in SQL Server 2008 with regards to linked servers? If I remove my network account from the Administrators group, the big error I'm getting is a 'Msg 7302, Level 16, State 1, Line 41' with a description something like "Cannot create an instance of OLE DB provider "ASEOLEDB" for linked server "", and all research points to permissions issues. Thoughts? This document talks about DCOM configuration and permissions, but we've tried all of it with no luck. Thanks

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2008 R2 Installation and the Phantom of SQL Server 2005 Express

    - by Davide Mauri
    Today I’ve happy started to install SQL Server 2008R2 on my development machine, which has this software installed Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard SQL Server 2008 SP1 CU5 Visual Studio 2008 SP1 BOL October 2009 AdventuresWorks2008 Databases SR4 Visual Studio 2010 RTM So, all the basic standard stuff. SQL Server 2008 R2 installation went smooth ‘till somewhere in the middle, where the rule engine checks that software pre-requisite are satisfied before starting to copy files. Here I had this @][@@[?!?! error: “The SQL Server 2005 Express Tools are installed. To continue, remove the SQL Server 2005 Express Tools.” Fun enough, I don’t have and I’ve never had SQL Server 2005 Express on my machine. Armed with patience I analyzed the install log here C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Setup Bootstrap\Log\yyyymmdd_hhmmss\Detail.txt and I’ve found that the rule “Sql2005SsmsExpressFacet” is the one in charge of this check and it look for existance of the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\ShellSEM (on x86) HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\ShellSEM (on x64) In my registry I’ve found that key existsing, due to the installation of the uber-cool Red-Gate SQL Search. I removed the registry key and here it is! SQL Server 2008 R2 is installing while I’m writing this post. A note to Microsoft: can you please add more detailed information on the setup while such error happens. Just saying “you have SQL Server 2005 Express installed” is not enough. Please show us what the rule look for and why it has failed directly in the Detailed Report, so that we don’t have to spend time to look for the needle in the logs. Thanks! :) PS I did a side-by-side installation with the existing SQL Server 2008 instance. Share this post: email it! | bookmark it! | digg it! | reddit! | kick it! | live it!

    Read the article

  • Can not create a linked server between SQL Server 2008 on a desktop and my laptop

    - by norlando
    I'm having an issue getting the linked server to connect between a desktop and my laptop. Both have SQL server 2008 and the link is coming from the desktop to my laptop. Also, both computers have Windows 7. I don't have any issues creating the linked server from my laptop to the desktop. The error I'm getting is "Login failed for user '[UserName]'. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 18456)." I let the user name out for security reasons. The user is an sa on both SQL servers and an admin on both computers. Does anyone have an idea what could be stopping me from creating the linked server from the desktop to my laptop?

    Read the article

  • Six in Six - SQL Server 2012 Webinars

    - by JustinL
    We're running six webinars over the next six months covering our experiences with SQL Server 2012 and customer deployments. I'm presenting the first on upgrading to SQL Server 2012 next month, subsequent sessions will be delivered by colleagues: NOVEMBER: SQL Server 2012 Upgrade Approach and considerations. Friday 23rd November 12:00 – 13:00 Present approaches for upgrade testing, managing risk and rollback. The session will include details on minimizing downtime and upgrading from SQL Server 2000, 2005, and 2008 including.... More details and register. DECEMBER: Delivering Mission Critical BI with SQL Server 2012– Friday 14th December 12:00-13:00 Information is the lifeblood of many organisations and the availability of timely, accurate information is critical to strategic decision making. This session covers the features and capabilities… More details and register. JANUARY: Architecting Highly Available solutions with SQL Server 2012 – Friday 18th January 12:00- 13:00 Overview and comparison of the high availability features available within SQL Server 2012. The session considers business requirements for availability and recoverability and presents a number of alternative solution designs to meet… More details and register. FEBRUARY: Private cloud deployments with SQL Server 2012 – Friday 15th February 12:00- 13:00 Cloud based technology provide cost effective scale and flexibility. This session provides an overview of the benefits organisations can realise through private cloud… More details and register. MARCH: Visualising data patterns with SQL Server 2012 – Friday 22nd March 12:00- 13:00 This webinar demonstrates the ease of delivering business insight by exploring information and identifying trends through data visualisation. SQL Server 2012 provides new capability with enhanced performance and … More details and register. APRIL: Architecting Highly Available solutions with SQL Server 2012 – Friday 26th April 12:00- 13:00 Customers are increasingly interested in leveraging the benefits of cloud based solutions to provide scalable and flexible infrastructure to host their applications. This session looks at common design patterns and workloads… More details and register. Justin Langford - Coeo Ltd SQL Server Consultants | SQL Server Remote DBA

    Read the article

  • Filezilla FTP Server - Security Implications of its usage on Windos Server 2003

    - by Brian Webster
    I'm running Filezilla server on my dedicated windows 2003 server. It uses its own user-access control system. The Filezilla server service itself is running under the System user. When I setup users within the FTP Server Administrator Interface, I do not need to setup equivalent users, or adjust permissions on folders to allow users to login. Example: I setup TestFTP user with password 'p' I set the home directoy of TestFTP user to be e:/website I verify that e:/website only has permission for the System and Admin accounts (right click - security in windows explorer) TestFTP is able to login to the server just fine. I'm OK with this (perhaps due to ignorance?). Is it generally frounded upon to utilize a FTP Server such as FileZilla Server that bypasses the built-in UAC in this method? If I wasn't clear enough, please let me know.

    Read the article

  • Renaming server - sql 2008 server instance affected

    - by user986363
    Will changing the computer name on which SQL Server 2008 is installed on affect SQL Server in anyway? Or will changing the computer name be transparent to SQL Server? For example: I plan to install Windows 2008 Server and naming it "BobStage". Next I will install SQL Server 2008 R2 and restore a few DB's. Finally I plan to rename the windows machine to "BobLive". Will me renaming the computer's name affect SQL Server's instance ID/name and possibly break something?

    Read the article

  • Oracle SQL Developer: Fetching SQL Statement Result Sets

    - by thatjeffsmith
    Running queries, browsing tables – you are often faced with many thousands, if not millions, of rows. Most people are happy with looking at the first few rows. But occasionally you need to see more. SQL Developer doesn’t show you all records, all at once. Instead, it brings the records down in ‘chunks,’ or as-needed. How It Works There is a preference that tells SQL Developer how many records to get in a single request, or ‘fetch’ of records. The default is 50… So if I run a query that returns MORE than 50 rows: There’s more than 50 records in this resultset, but we have 50 in the grid to start with. We don’t know how many records are in this result set actually. To show the record count here, we actually go physically query the database with a row count type query. All we know is that the query has finished executing, and that there are rows available to go fetch. It tells us when it’s done. As you scroll through the grid, if you get to record 50 and scroll more, we’ll get 50 more records. Or, you can cheat to get to the ‘bottom’ of the result set. You can ask SQL Developer to just to get all the records at once… Once all the records have been fetched, you’ll see this: All rows fetched! A word of caution There’s a reason we have the default set to 50 and not 1000. Bringing back data can get expensive and heavy. We’ve found the best performance to be found in that 50 to 200 record range.

    Read the article

  • Cannont add service account to domain group during sql cluster install

    - by Sam
    I'm installing a 2008 instance on a 2003 machine which is already running 2005. I need to set up domain groups for the security setup step: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms179530.aspx On Windows Server 2003, specify domain groups for SQL Server services. All resource permissions are controlled by domain-level groups that include SQL Server service accounts as group members. Much more info on this here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/910708 I've had problems with being able to add the windows service accounts to the groups at install time. The security admins had to make my account a domain admin - which they were hesitant to do. The account under which SQL Server Setup is running must have permissions to add accounts to the domain groups. Is there a specific security setting which would allow my account to add accounts to a group?

    Read the article

  • Slow login to load-balanced Terminal Server 2008 behind Gateway Server

    - by Frans
    I have a small load-balanced (using Session Broker) Terminal Server 2008 farm behind a Gateway Server which is accessed from the Internet. The problem I have is that there is a delay of 20-30 seconds if the session broker switches the user to another server during login. I think this is related to the fact that I am forcing the security layer to be RDP rather than SSL. The background The Gateway server has a public routeable IP addres and DNS name so it can be accessed from the Internet and all users come in via this route (the system is used to provide access to hosted applications to external customers). The actual terminal servers only have internal IP addresses. This works really well, except that with a Vista or Windows 7 client, the Remote Desktop client will negotiate with the server to use SSL for the security layer. This then exposes the auto-generated certificate that TS1 or TS2 has - but since they are internal, auto-generated certificates, the client will get a stern warning that the certificate is not valid. I can't give the servers a properly authorised certificate as the servers do not have public routeable IP address or DNS name. Instead, I am using Group Policy to force the connections to be over RDP instead of SSL. \Computer Configuration\Policies\Administrative Templates\Windows Components\Terminal Services\Terminal Server\Security\Require use of specific security layer for remote (RDP) connections The Windows 7 user now gets a much less stern warning that "the server's identity cannot be confirmed" which I can live with. I don't have enough control over the end-user's machines to ask them to install a new root certificate either. TS1 and TS2 are also load-balanced using the Session Broker, which is installed on the Gateway Server. I am using round-robin DNS, so the user's initial connection will go via Gateway1 to either TS1 or TS2. TS1/TS2 will then talk to the session broker and may pass the user to the other server. I.e. the user may get connected to TS2, but after talking to the session broker the user may be passed to TS1, which is where they will run their session. When this switching of servers happens, in my setup, the screen sits with the word "Welcome" for 20-30 seconds after which it flickers, Welcome is shown again and then flashing through nthe normal login screens (i.e. "wait for user profile manager" etc). Having done some research, I think what is happening is that the user is being fully logged on to TS2 (while "Welcome" is shown) before being passed to TS1, where they are then logged in again. It is interesting that normally when you see the ""Welcome" word, the little circle to left rotates. However, it does not rotate during this delay - the screen just looks frozen. This blog post leads me to think that this is because CredSSP is not being used, probably because I am disallowing SSL and forcing RDP. What I have tried I enabled SSL again which removes the "Welcome" delay. However, it seems to introduc a new delay much earlier in the process. Specifically, when the RDP client is saying "initialising connection" - this is now much slower. Quite apart from the fact that my certificate problem precludes me using that solution without considerable difficulty. I tried disabling the load balancing (just remove the servers from the session broker farm) and the connections do not have any delay. The problem is also intermittent in the sense that it only happens when the user gets bumped from one server to another. I tested this by trying to connect directly to TS1 (via the Gateway, of course) and then checking which server I actually got connected to. Just to be sure, I also by-passed the round-robin DNS to see if it had any impact and it doesn't. The setup is essentially in line with MS recommendations here: TS Session Broker Load Balancing Step-by-Step Guide I tried changing to using a dedicated redirector. Basically, rather than using a round-robin DNS, I pointed my DNS to the Gateway server and configured it to be a dedicated redirector (disallow logons, add it to the farm). Same problem, alas. Any ideas or suggestions gratefully received.

    Read the article

  • LINQ to SQL vs Entity Framework for an app with a future SQL Azure version

    - by Craig L
    I've got a vertical market Dot Net Framework 1.1 C#/WinForms/SQL Server 2000 application. Currently it uses ADO.Net and Microsoft's SQLHelper for CRUD operations. I've successfully converted it to Dot Net Framework 4 C#/WinForms/ SQL Server 2008. What I'd like to do is also offer my customers the ability to use SQL Azure as a backend storage for their data instead of local/LAN SQL Server. If I know SQL Azure is in my application's future, should I: A. Switch to LINQ to SQL B. Swith to Entity Framework C. Stick with ADO.Net and SQLHelper Thanks !

    Read the article

  • mysql cluster problem in ubuntu

    - by Firman
    I have a problem while installing and configuring mysql cluster runnign on ubuntu 10.10 This is configuration for Cluster management [NDBD DEFAULT] NoOfReplicas=2 DataMemory=10MB IndexMemory=25MB MaxNoOfTables=256 MaxNoOfOrderedIndexes=256 MaxNoOfUniqueHashIndexes=128 [MYSQLD DEFAULT] [NDB_MGMD DEFAULT] [TCP DEFAULT] [NDB_MGMD] Id=1 # the NDB Management Node (this one) HostName=192.168.10.101 [NDBD] Id=2 # the first NDB Data Node HostName=192.168.10.11 DataDir= /var/lib/mysql-cluster [NDBD] Id=3 # the second NDB Data Node HostName=192.168.10.12 DataDir=/var/lib/mysql-cluster [MYSQLD] [MYSQLD] and this is configuration for both node : [mysqld] ndbcluster ndb-connectstring=192.168.10.101 # the IP of the MANAGMENT (THIRD) SERVER [mysql_cluster] ndb-connectstring=192.168.10.101 # the IP of the MANAGMENT (THIRD) SERVER After running all node and management, and I use ndb_mgm, the type 'show' command, and something appear like this : ndb_mgm> show Connected to Management Server at: localhost:1186 Cluster Configuration --------------------- [ndbd(NDB)] 2 node(s) id=2 @192.168.10.11 (mysql-5.1.39 ndb-7.0.9, Nodegroup: 0, Master) id=3 @192.168.10.12 (mysql-5.1.39 ndb-7.0.9, Nodegroup: 0) [ndb_mgmd(MGM)] 1 node(s) id=1 @192.168.10.101 (mysql-5.1.39 ndb-7.0.9) [mysqld(API)] 1 node(s) id=4 (not connected, accepting connect from 192.168.10.101) look at two last line.. not as what http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/articles/mysql-cluster-for-two-servers.html look like (see at point 4) anyone have ever had this problem ?

    Read the article

  • Fix: Connections to SQL Server 2005 on Windows Vista suddenly stop working

    - by NTulip
    On my Vista machine at work, applications and the SQL Server Management Console work fine connecting to SQL Server 2005. Sometimes they are ok for weeks at a time, sometime for hours and then they stop connecting. I've tried everything to get it to work including the installation of SPII and running the user provisioning tool without any luck. The only way to fix it was to restart. The Error: Connections are refused with the standard error message: Cannot connect to SERVER_NAME\INSTANCE_NAME ------------------------------ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: -1) For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=-1&LinkId=20476 The Fix: Stop and restart the Sql Server Browser, Sql Server integration, SQL Server Active Directory Helper services. Works like a charm.

    Read the article

  • How to setup Windows Server 2008 R2 Server Core

    - by Robert Koritnik
    I'm an MSDN subscriber. I would like to install Windows Server 2008 R2 Server Core, but when I insert MSDN #4629 DVD there're only full versions of Windows Server 2008 R2. How am I supposed to install Server Core then? Any suggestions? Is it possible to covert it back to server core when a GUI version's already installed?

    Read the article

  • Multiple IPs on single server - Specify which is used to connect (MS server 2008 / DNS)

    - by runboy
    I have a Windows 2008 server with multiple IPs that is acting as DNS server. I have set the DNS server up to only accept connections on a single of these IPs. The DNS is serving as secondary DNS and when it connects to the primary DNS server it is not connecting with this particular IP address, but one of the other IPs. Is there a way in which I can make sure the server connects using the correct IP?

    Read the article

  • sql server uninstallation issue

    - by angel
    I'm unable to remove SQL Server 2008 sp1 completely from my system. I'm using windows 7 ultimate. Everytime I try uninstalling it i get the following error. How can I remove it? here is the log: Overall summary: Final result: Failed: see details below Exit code (Decimal): -2068643839 Exit facility code: 1203 Exit error code: 1 Exit message: Failed: see details below Start time: 2013-06-24 21:10:38 End time: 2013-06-24 21:21:17 Requested action: Uninstall Log with failure: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Setup Bootstrap\Log\20130624_210908\sql_rs_Cpu64_1.log Exception help link: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?LinkId=20476&ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=setup.rll&EvtID=50000&ProdVer=10.0.1600.22 Machine Properties: Machine name: ABHI-PC Machine processor count: 4 OS version: Windows Vista OS service pack: Service Pack 1 OS region: United States OS language: English (United States) OS architecture: x64 Process architecture: 64 Bit OS clustered: No Product features discovered: Product Instance Instance ID Feature Language Edition Version Clustered Sql Server 2008 MSSQLSERVER MSRS10.MSSQLSERVER Reporting Services 1033 Enterprise Edition 10.0.1600.22 No Sql Server 2008 Management Tools - Basic 10.0.1600.22 No Package properties: Description: SQL Server Database Services 2008 SQLProductFamilyCode: {628F8F38-600E-493D-9946-F4178F20A8A9} ProductName: SQL2008 Type: RTM Version: 10 SPLevel: 0 Installation edition: ENTERPRISE User Input Settings: ACTION: Uninstall CONFIGURATIONFILE: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Setup Bootstrap\Log\20130624_210908\ConfigurationFile.ini FEATURES: RS,SSMS,SNAC_SDK,CE_RUNTIME,CE_TOOLS,SNAC HELP: False INDICATEPROGRESS: False INSTANCEID: INSTANCENAME: MSSQLSERVER MEDIASOURCE: QUIET: False QUIETSIMPLE: False X86: False Configuration file: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Setup Bootstrap\Log\20130624_210908\ConfigurationFile.ini Detailed results: Feature: SQL Client Connectivity Status: Skipped MSI status: Passed Configuration status: Passed Feature: SQL Client Connectivity SDK Status: Skipped MSI status: Passed Configuration status: Passed Feature: Reporting Services Status: Failed: see logs for details MSI status: Passed Configuration status: Failed: see details below Configuration error code: 0xFFD65603 Configuration error description: Input string was not in a correct format. Configuration log: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Setup Bootstrap\Log\20130624_210908\Detail.txt Feature: SQL Compact Edition Tools Status: Passed MSI status: Passed Configuration status: Passed Feature: SQL Compact Edition Runtime Status: Skipped MSI status: Passed Configuration status: Passed Feature: Management Tools - Basic Status: Failed: see logs for details MSI status: Passed Configuration status: Passed Rules with failures: Global rules: There are no scenario-specific rules. Rules report file: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Setup Bootstrap\Log\20130624_210908\SystemConfigurationCheck_Report.htm

    Read the article

  • Database Firewall

    - by ???02
    Database Firewall?????SQL????????SQL????????????WEB?????HTTP??????SQL????????SQL????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????SQL??????????????????????????????????????·WEB???????????????????·??????????????????WEB???????????WEB??????????Web?????????????????IPA???????????SQL?????????????????????SQL??????????????????????SQL????????????????WEB??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????WEB????????????????????????????????????????B to B?B to C???WEB????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????WEB?????????????????????WEB??????????????????·??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????WEB???????SQL?????????????????????????????Oracle Database Firewall???SQL??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????2011?Oracle Database Firewall?????????·????????????????????????????????????????Oracle Database Firewall??????????????????SQL?????????·?????????????????????? Oracle Database Fireawall ?Oracle Database Firewall???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????SQL??????????????????????????????????????????2????????????????????SQL???Pass?Block????????????SQL?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????SQL????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????SQL?Oracle Database Firewall???????????????????SQL????????????????WEB??????????Oracle Database Firewall???????????????????????????????????Oracle Database??????SQL Server?DB2?Sybase??????????2????????Oracle Database Firewall?????????????????????????????????????????????????Oracle Database Firewall?????????????????????????????????????????????SQL???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????SPAN???(?????????)?????????????????????????????????SQL???????????????????????????????????????????SQL?Block???Pass??????????????????????????????????IDS?IPS????????????????????WAF (Web Application Firewall)? ??????????????????????????????????Database Firewall???????????????SQL????????????SQL????400????????????????(ISO/IEC 9075)??????????Oracle Database Firewall???????????????????????????????????????????SQL?????????????????????SQL??????Oracle Database Firewall??Oracle Database, SQL Server, DB2??????????????????????SQL???????????????????SQL??????????????????????????????????SQL???????????????????????????????????SQL????????????????????????????????????Oracle Database Firewall???SQL??????Oracle Database Firewall?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????(Oracle Database???10gR2??XML??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Oracle Database???????????????????Oracle Database???????????????????????????????)???Oracle Database Firewall??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Oracle Database Firewall????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????? Oracle Direct

    Read the article

  • Cluster Nodes as RAID Drives

    - by BuckWoody
    I'm unable to sleep tonight so I thought I would push this post out VERY early. When you don't sleep your mind takes interesting turns, which can be a good thing. I was watching a briefing today by a couple of friends as they were talking about various ways to arrange a Windows Server Cluster for SQL Server. I often see an "active" node of a cluster with a "passive" node backing it up. That means one node is working and accepting transactions, and the other is not doing any work but simply "standing by" waiting for the first to fail over. The configuration in the demonstration I saw was a bit different. In this example, there were three nodes that were actively working, and a fourth standing by for all three. I've put configurations like this one into place before, but as I was looking at their architecture diagram, it looked familar - it looked like a RAID drive setup! And that's not a bad way to think about your cluster arrangements. The same concerns you might think about for a particular RAID configuration provides a good way to think about protecting your systems in general. So even if you're not staying awake all night thinking about SQL Server clusters, take this post as an opportunity for "lateral thinking" - a way of combining in your mind the concepts from one piece of knowledge to another. You might find a new way of making your technical environment a little better. Share this post: email it! | bookmark it! | digg it! | reddit! | kick it! | live it!

    Read the article

  • I need advice on how to debug a cluster

    - by alcor
    I'm the only developer of a complex critical software system, written in Visual C++ 2005. It's deployed on a classical Microsoft cluster scenario (active/passive), that has Windows Server 2003 R2. If a server A goes down, the other one (B) starts and take the ownership of its duties. You have to know that: both servers have the same Microsoft patches/fixes, same hardware, same everything. both servers use the same memory storage (a RAID-6 through fiber channel). this software has a main module who launch the peripheral modules. if a peripheral module crashes, the main module restarts it. When I switch the application in one of the two servers (let's say the B server) two of the peripheral modules of the main applications just started to crash apparently without reason about 2 seconds after the start of the peripheral module. What could I do to analyze/inspect/resolve this weird situation?

    Read the article

  • How to avoid the "divide by zero" error in SQL?

    - by Henrik Staun Poulsen
    I hate this error message: Msg 8134, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Divide by zero error encountered. What is the best way to write SQL code, so that I will never see this error message again? I mean, I could add a where clause so that my divisor is never zero. Or I could add a case statement, so that there is a special treatment for zero. Is the best way to use a NullIf clause? Is there better way, or how can this be enforced?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57  | Next Page >