Search Results

Search found 10939 results on 438 pages for 'business intelligence epm'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 51/438 | < Previous Page | 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58  | Next Page >

  • Hyperion Smart View Assistance

    - by p.anda
    (in via Akhter) Seeking more information or assistance with Hyperion Smart View?  The Oracle Technology Network (OTN) is a great first place to "stop-by".  Here the site provides access to the latest installer, general product documentation as well as Whitepapers, "Whats New" and "Oracle by Example" tutorials: OTN: Overview | Downloads | Documentation | Tutorials  For the latest documentation including Readme, New Features, User's Guide, Developer's Guide and Accessibility Guide visit: Oracle Hyperion Smart View for Office Documentation Release 11.1.2.5 Several "My Oracle Support" Knowledge (KM) Articles are available including: OBIEE 11.1.1.7 - New Features And Recommendations For Working With Microsoft Office [ Doc ID 1558070.1]- How to Integrate OBIEE with Microsoft Office Using Oracle Hyperion Smart View For Office [ Doc ID 1576336.1] - How To Create New Report From Scratch Within Excel Using Smart View [ Doc ID 1576596.1] These along with additional KM articles are being indexed in a Master Note - to keep up to-date with new articles bookmark this index page at: Master Note For Oracle Hyperion Smart View For Office Issues in OBIEE Doc ID 1589028.1

    Read the article

  • Exalytics Disaster Recovery

    - by Saresh
    Q:Where can you find more information about Exalytics Disaster Recovery? Ans: Exalytics Disaster Recovery: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E41246_01/bi.1/e39709/admin_dr.htm#BABCFGEC Note 1568360.1 -Oracle Exalytics Deployment Guide (Download the whitepaper attached to the Note) OBIEE http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E28280_01/bi.1111/e10541/backup.htm#CHDFEIGF Note 1316073.1 - OBIEE 11g: Recommended Strategies For Disaster Recovery or Backup Oracle Hyperion EPM http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17236_01/epm.1112/epm_high_avail_11121.pdf (Though this is for Hyperion EPM 11.1.2.1, it is applicable to 11.1.2.2 as well) TimesTen: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21901_01/doc/timesten.1122/e21632/migrate.htmhttp://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21901_01/doc/timesten.1122/e21635/standbycache.htm#CBAJDJBD EPM Disaster Recovery : http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-foundation/epm-dr-best-practice-130229.ppt Oracle® Enterprise Performance Management System Backup and Recovery Guide :http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17236_01/epm.1112/epm_backup_recovery_1112200.pdf

    Read the article

  • Parallelize incremental processing in Tabular #ssas #tabular

    - by Marco Russo (SQLBI)
    I recently came in a problem trying to improve the parallelism of Tabular processing. As you know, multiple tables can be processed in parallel, whereas the processing of several partitions within the same table cannot be parallelized. When you perform an incremental update by adding only new rows to existing table, what you really do is adding rows to a partition, so adding rows to many tables means adding rows to several partitions. The particular condition you have in this case is that every partition in which you add rows belongs to a different table. Adding rows implies using the ProcessAdd command; its QueryBinding parameter specifies a SQL syntax to read new rows, otherwise the original query specified for the partition will be used, and it could generate duplicated data if you don’t have a dynamic behavior on the SQL side. If you create the required XMLA code manually, you will find that the QueryBinding node that should be part of the ProcessAdd command has to be moved out from ProcessAdd in case you are using a Batch command with more than one Process command (which is the reason why you want to use a single batch: run multiple process operations in parallel!). If you use AMO (Analysis Management Objects) you will find that this combination is not supported, even if you don’t have a syntax error compiling the code, but you might obtain this error at execution time: The syntax for the 'Process' command is incorrect. The 'Bindings' keyword cannot appear under a 'Process' command if the 'Process' command is a part of a 'Batch' command and there are more than one 'Process' commands in the 'Batch' or the 'Batch' command contains any out of line related information. In this case, the 'Bindings' keyword should be a part of the 'Batch' command only. If this is happening to you, the best solution I’ve found is manipulating the XMLA code generated by AMO moving the Binding nodes in the right place. A more detailed description of the issue and the code required to send a correct XMLA batch to Analysis Services is available in my article Parallelize ProcessAdd with AMO. By the way, the same technique (and code) can be used also if you have the same problem in a Multidimensional model.

    Read the article

  • The Business Value of Global HCM

    Jay Richey, Director, HCM Product Marketing discusses the challenges that organizations are facing in managing a global workforce and how Oracle's HCM solutions can help customers get the most out of their investment.

    Read the article

  • What algorithm(s) can be used to achieve reasonably good next word prediction?

    - by yati sagade
    What is a good way of implementing "next-word prediction"? For example, the user types "I am" and the system suggests "a" and "not" (or possibly others) as the next word. I am aware of a method that uses Markov Chains and some training text(obviously) to more or less achieve this. But I read somewhere that this method is very restrictive and applies to very simple cases. I understand basics of neural networks and genetic algorithms(though have never used them in a serious project) and maybe they could be of some help. I wonder if there are any algorithms that, given appropriate training text(e.g., newspaper articles, and the user's own typing) can come up with reasonably appropriate suggestions for the next word. If not (links to)algorithms, general high-level methods to attack this problem are welcome.

    Read the article

  • What Can You Do When You Need More Than Just CRM?

    - by charles.knapp
    Sometimes a company needs more than just CRM to grow profitably. What if you also need ERP for streamlining the rest of your operations? Unlike CRM-only companies, Oracle can help you - today. For example, Myriad Genetics was an early pioneer and is currently a global life sciences leader in the exciting field of molecular diagnostic products. To keep pace with company growth, Myriad needed to integrate disparate systems and automate paper-based processes. Furthermore, Myriad needed to increase sales pipeline visibility to maximize customer service. Myriad selected Oracle CRM On Demand and E-Business Suite ERP applications. As a result, Myriad standardized sales processes, ensured greater visibility into the pipeline, and improved customer service. Read more here about Myriad and their business results.

    Read the article

  • CMS is Perfect Solution for Small Business Owners

    A website can be built easily with content management system because it has the ability to add Pages in simple format like text format and they are automatically translated into perfect to near perfe... [Author: Alan Smith - Web Design and Development - March 21, 2010]

    Read the article

  • Create association between informations

    - by Andrea Girardi
    I deployed a project some days ago that allow to extract some medical articles using the results of a questionnaire completed by a user. For instance, if I reply on questionnaire I'm affected by Diabetes type 2 and I'm a smoker, my algorithm extracts all articles related to diabetes bubbling up all articles contains information about Diabetes type 2 and smoking. Basically we created a list of topic and, for every topic we define a kind of "guideline" that allows to extract and order informations for a user. I'm quite sure there are some better way to put on relationship two content but I was not able to find them on network. Could you suggest my a model, algorithm or paper to better understand this kind of problem and that helps me to find a faster, and more accurate way to extract information for an user?

    Read the article

  • You, Your Business and SEO

    We are taught that family is the central unit of our society and it composes key persons working together. There are also different factors needed to have a successful and happy family.

    Read the article

  • Week in Geek: Free Version of Google Apps for Business has been Discontinued

    - by Asian Angel
    This week’s edition of WIG is filled with news link coverage on topics such as Android’s ‘Google Now’ services are headed for Chrome, Microsoft is ready to push Hotmail users to Outlook.com, a 25 GPU setup devours password hashes at up to 348 billion per second, and more. How to Factory Reset Your Android Phone or Tablet When It Won’t Boot Our Geek Trivia App for Windows 8 is Now Available Everywhere How To Boot Your Android Phone or Tablet Into Safe Mode

    Read the article

  • Designing a Business Rule Engine

    - by Nisha_Roy
    I have a requirement where there are 10 Rules to be applied on data in excel. If Rule 1 and Rule 2 fails rest of the rules are not checked. But if Rule 1 and Rule 2 passes the rest of all the Rules should be verified and if any errors found- they should be logged. Is there any design pattern which I can use to keep this Rule Engine flexible for adding these 10 rules and Closed for any additional chains in the Current Rule. I was thinking of something like a Decorator Pattern. Will this help me achieve that?

    Read the article

  • Web-Based Custom Accounting Software in PHP - Customize As Per Your Business

    Most businesses, accountants and financial auditors are still using old desktop-based accounting software for their accounting needs. This is changing though, and for very good reasons. Most of the major players in the accounting software industry have launched online software-as-a-service solutions allowing customers to pay a monthly fee to get access to their books online.

    Read the article

  • Business Case for investing time developing Stubs and BizUnit Tests

    - by charlie.mott
    I was recently in a position where I had to justify why effort should be spent developing Stubbed Integration Tests for BizTalk solutions. These tests are usually developed using the BizUnit framework. I assumed that most seasoned BizTalk developers would consider this best practice. Even though Microsoft suggest use of BizUnit on MSDN, I've not found a single site listing the justifications for investing time writing stubs and BizUnit tests. Stubs Stubs should be developed to isolate your development team from external dependencies. This is described by Michael Stephenson here. Failing to do this can result in the following problems: In contract-first scenarios, the external system interface will have been defined.  But the interface may not have been setup or even developed yet for the BizTalk developers to work with. By the time you open the target location to see the data BizTalk has sent, it may have been swept away. If you are relying on the UI of the target system to see the data BizTalk has sent, what do you do if it fails to arrive? It may take time for the data to be processed or it may be scheduled to be processed later. Learning how to use the source\target systems and investigations into where things go wrong in these systems will slow down the BizTalk development effort. By the time the data is visible in a UI it may have undergone further transformations. In larger development teams working together, do you all use the same source and target instances. How do you know which data was created by whose tests? How do you know which event log error message are whose?  Another developer may have “cleaned up” your data. It is harder to write BizUnit tests that clean up the data\logs after each test run. What if your B2B partners' source or target system cannot support the sort of testing you want to do. They may not even have a development or test instance that you can work with. Their single test instance may be used by the SIT\UAT teams. There may be licencing costs of setting up an instances of the external system. The stubs I like to use are generic stubs that can accept\return any message type.  Usually I need to create one per protocol. They should be driven by BizUnit steps to: validates the data received; and select a response messages (or error response). Once built, they can be re-used for many integration tests and from project to project. I’m not saying that developers should never test against a real instance.  Every so often, you still need to connect to real developer or test instances of the source and target endpoints\services. The interface developers may ask you to send them some data to see if everything still works.  Or you might want some messages sent to BizTalk to get confidence that everything still works beyond BizTalk. Tests Automated “Stubbed Integration Tests” are usually built using the BizUnit framework. These facilitate testing of the entire integration process from source stub to target stub. It will ensure that all of the BizTalk components are configured together correctly to meet all the requirements. More fine grained unit testing of individual BizTalk components is still encouraged.  But BizUnit provides much the easiest way to test some components types (e.g. Orchestrations). Using BizUnit with the Behaviour Driven Development approach described by Mike Stephenson delivers the following benefits: source: http://biztalkbddsample.codeplex.com – Video 1. Requirements can be easily defined using Given/When/Then Requirements are close to the code so easier to manage as features and scenarios Requirements are defined in domain language The feature files can be used as part of the documentation The documentation is accurate to the build of code and can be published with a release The scenarios are effective to document the scenarios and are not over excessive The scenarios are maintained with the code There’s an abstraction between the intention and implementation of tests making them easier to understand The requirements drive the testing These same tests can also be used to drive load testing as described here. If you don't do this ... If you don't follow the above “Stubbed Integration Tests” approach, the developer will need to manually trigger the tests. This has the following risks: Developers are unlikely to check all the scenarios each time and all the expected conditions each time. After the developer leaves, these manual test steps may be lost. What test scenarios are there?  What test messages did they use for each scenario? There is no mechanism to prove adequate test coverage. A test team may attempt to automate integration test scenarios in a test environment through the triggering of tests from a source system UI. If this is a replacement for BizUnit tests, then this carries the following risks: It moves the tests downstream, so problems will be found later in the process. Testers may not check all the expected conditions within the BizTalk infrastructure such as: event logs, suspended messages, etc. These automated tests may also get in the way of manual tests run on these environments.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58  | Next Page >