Search Results

Search found 4517 results on 181 pages for 'expression sketchflow'.

Page 51/181 | < Previous Page | 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58  | Next Page >

  • How to stop ReSharper from showing error on a lambda expression where Action is expected?

    - by carlmon
    In Silverlight, System.Windows.Threading's Dispatcher.BeginInvoke() takes an Action<T> or a delegate to invoke. .NET allows me to pass just the lambda expression. but ReSharper sees it as an error, saying "Cannot resolve method 'BeginInvoke(lambda expression)'": Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => { DoSomething(); }) The error goes away if I explicitly create the Action around the expression like this: Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(new Action<object>(o => { DoSomething(); })); I prefer the least amount of code in this case for the best readability. Is there a way to disable this specific ReSharper error notification? I tried some of the options, but could not find it. Thanks, Carl

    Read the article

  • Phone Number validation using Regular Expression validation in c# 2008?

    - by prateeksaluja20
    Hello Experts , I Want to validate the phone number in this format i.e +919981424199,+91231456789,.... I am using Asp.net +c#2008 for developing web site.for this i have used the Regular Expression validation control-property-Validation Expression="[0-9]+(,[0-9]+)*". But this accept the number as 919981424199,..... User may be enter in this way +919981424199,919300951916,so on so i need the validation expression for this type format.The "+" symbol is optional it can be use & it can't.I tried to solve but still i am searching.please help me to sort out this problem. thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • What is the max LINQ Expression Trees can do?

    - by yeeen
    What is the maximun that LINQ expression Tree can do? Can it define a class? How about a method, with all the declared name, modifiers, parametertype and return type? Must the program always define the tree himself? Is it possible to generate the tree from a given C# file? Where can I get resources to learn about writing basic to advanced Expression Tree and Expression Tree Visitor? (articles and videos will be great) Thanks for those who are able to help...

    Read the article

  • what is regular expression not generated over {a,b}?

    - by Loop
    Hello all, I am really stuck with these 2 question for over 2 days now. trying to figure out what the question means.... my tutor is out of town too.... write a regular expression for the only strings that are not generated over {a,b} by the expression: (a+b)*a(a+b)*. explain your reasoning. and i tried the second question, do you think is there any better answer than this one? what is regular expression of set of string that contain an odd number of a's or exactly two b's................(a((a|b)(a|b))*|bb).... coz i know to represent any odd length of a's, the RE is a((a|b)(a|b))*

    Read the article

  • shift reduce&& reduce reduce errors in build parser for python garmmer

    - by user366580
    i wanna build buttom up parser by java cup i write code in java cup , it is for python language so i used grammer was written in this site : but not all grammer , i choice partial set ,just while , identifer also i smiplified them when i did compile for the java cup that i write by write this command in command prompt window : java java_cup.Main -parser CalcParser -symbols CalcSymbol < javacupfile.cup i get conflict errors ,they are of type reduce-shift conflict and reduce-reduce conflict you can see to print screen of the errors in these links image 1 click here to see imge1 the grammer was in EBNF form in as refernce site and i convert it to BNF form maybe i make mistake in converting so i get such errors the origanl grammmer was // grammer in EBNF form identifier ::= (letter|"_") (letter | digit | "_")* letter ::= lowercase | uppercase lowercase ::= "a"..."z" uppercase ::= "A"..."Z" digit ::= "0"..."9 compound_stmt ::= if_stmt | while_stmt for_stmt ::= "for" target_list "in" expression_list ":" suite ["else" ":" suite] while_stmt ::= "while" expression ":" suite ["else" ":" suite] suite ::= stmt_list NEWLINE stmt_list ::= simple_stmt (";" simple_stmt)* [";"] simple_stmt ::= expression_stmt expression_stmt ::= expression_list expression_list ::= expression ( "," expression )* [","] expression ::= conditional_expression conditional_expression ::= or_test ["if" or_test "else" expression] or_test ::= and_test | or_test "or" and_test and_test ::= not_test | and_test "and" not_test not_test ::= comparison | "not" not_test comparison ::= or_expr ( comp_operator or_expr )* comp_operator ::= "<" | ">" | "==" | ">=" | "<=" | "<>" | "!=" | "is" ["not"] | ["not"] "in" or_expr ::= xor_expr | or_expr "|" xor_expr xor_expr ::= and_expr | xor_expr "^" and_expr and_expr ::= "&" | and_expr the grammer after converting to BNF form identifier ::=letterletter| letterdigit| letter"_"| "_"letter | "_"digit | "_""_" letter ::= lowercase | uppercase lowercase ::= "a"..."z" uppercase ::= "A"..."Z" digit ::= "0"..."9 while_stmt ::= "while" expression ":" suite "else" ":" suite |"while" expression ":" suite suite ::= stmt_list NEWLINE stmt_list ::= simple_stmt ";" simple_stmt stmt_list|";" simple_stmt ::= expression_stmt expression_stmt ::= expression_list expression_list ::= expression "," expression expression_list| "," expression ::= conditional_expression conditional_expression ::= or_test "if" or_test "else" expression |or_test or_test ::= and_test | or_test "or" and_test and_test ::= not_test | and_test "and" not_test not_test ::= comparison | "not" not_test comparison ::= or_expr comp_operator or_expr comp_operator ::= "<" | ">" | "==" | ">=" | "<=" | "<>" | "!=" | "is" ["not"] | ["not"] "in" or_expr ::= xor_expr | or_expr "|" xor_expr xor_expr ::= and_expr | xor_expr "^" and_expr and_expr ::= "&" | and_expr and the java cup file that i compile and get those errors is import java.io.*; terminal COMA; terminal ELSE; terminal WHILE; terminal NEWLINE; terminal SEMCOLON; terminal CAMMA; terminal IF; terminal OR; terminal AND; terminal NOT; terminal LESS; terminal GREATER; terminal EQUAL; terminal GREATERorE; terminal LESSorE; terminal NEQUAL; terminal OROP; terminal XOROP; terminal ANDOP; terminal Integer DIGIT; terminal java.lang.String LOWERCASE; terminal java.lang.String UPPERCASE; non terminal java.lang.String IDENTIFIER; non terminal java.lang.String LETTER; non terminal COMPOUND_STMT; non terminal WHILE_STMT; non terminal EXPRESSION; non terminal SUITE ; non terminal STMT_LIST; non terminal SIMPLE_STMT; non terminal EXPRESSION_STMT; non terminal EXPRESSION_LIST; non terminal CONDITITONAL_EXPRESSION; non terminal OR_TEST; non terminal AND_TEST; non terminal NOT_TEST; non terminal COMPARISON; non terminal COMP_OPERATOR; non terminal OR_EXPR; non terminal XOR_EXPR; non terminal AND_EXPR; IDENTIFIER ::=LETTER{: System.out.printf("lowercase"); :}| {: System.out.printf("uppercase"); :} LETTER{: System.out.printf("lowercase"); :}| {: System.out.printf("uppercase"); :}| LETTER{: System.out.printf("lowercase"); :}| {: System.out.printf("uppercase"); :} DIGIT; LETTER ::= LOWERCASE | UPPERCASE; COMPOUND_STMT ::=WHILE_STMT; WHILE_STMT ::= WHILE{: System.out.printf( "while"); :} EXPRESSION COMA {: System.out.printf(":"); :} SUITE ELSE {: System.out.printf("else" ); :} COMA{: System.out.printf( ":" ); :} SUITE |WHILE{: System.out.printf( "while" ); :} EXPRESSION COMA{: System.out.printf( ":" ); :} SUITE; SUITE ::= STMT_LIST NEWLINE{: System.out.printf( "newline" ); :}; STMT_LIST ::= SIMPLE_STMT SEMCOLON{: System.out.printf( ";" ); :} SIMPLE_STMT STMT_LIST|SEMCOLON{: System.out.printf( ";" ); :}; SIMPLE_STMT ::=EXPRESSION_STMT; EXPRESSION_STMT ::=EXPRESSION_LIST; EXPRESSION_LIST ::= EXPRESSION CAMMA{: System.out.printf( "," ); :} EXPRESSION EXPRESSION_LIST| CAMMA{: System.out.printf( "," ); :}; EXPRESSION ::= CONDITITONAL_EXPRESSION; CONDITITONAL_EXPRESSION ::= OR_TEST IF{: System.out.printf( "if"); :} OR_TEST ELSE{: System.out.printf("else"); :} EXPRESSION |OR_TEST; OR_TEST ::= AND_TEST | OR_TEST OR{: System.out.printf( "or"); :} AND_TEST; AND_TEST ::= NOT_TEST | AND_TEST AND{: System.out.printf( "and"); :} NOT_TEST; NOT_TEST ::= COMPARISON | NOT{: System.out.printf("not"); :} NOT_TEST; COMPARISON ::= OR_EXPR COMP_OPERATOR OR_EXPR ; COMP_OPERATOR ::= LESS{: System.out.printf( "<"); :} | GREATER{: System.out.printf(">"); :} | EQUAL{: System.out.printf("=="); :} | GREATERorE{: System.out.printf(">="); :} | LESSorE{: System.out.printf("<="); :} | NEQUAL{: System.out.printf("!="); :}; OR_EXPR ::= XOR_EXPR | OR_EXPR OROP{: System.out.printf("|"); :} XOR_EXPR; XOR_EXPR ::= AND_EXPR | XOR_EXPR XOROP {: System.out.printf("^"); :}XOR_EXPR; AND_EXPR ::= ANDOP{: System.out.printf("&"); :} | AND_EXPR; can any one told me how can solve this errors to build parser correcrtly??

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to create ICriteria/ICriterion from LINQ or HQL?

    - by adrin
    I am creating a method that can create filter understood by NHibernate (by filter i mean a set of ICriteria object for example) from my abstract filter object. public static IEnumerable<ICriterion> ToNhCriteria(this MyCriteria criteria) { // T4 generated function // lots of result.Add(Expression.Or(Expression.Eq(),Expression.Eq)) expression trees - hard to generate // Is there a way to generate HQL/Linq query here istead? } then i want to do something like session.CreateCriteria<Entity>().Add(myCriteria.ToNhCriteria()) to filter entities. The problem is that using Expression. methods (Expression.Or etc) is quite tedious (the method is generated and i have multiple or statements that have to be joined into an expression somehow). Is there a way to avoid using Expression.Or() and create ICrietrion / ICriteria using LINQ or HQL?

    Read the article

  • How to make that the LanguageBinder take precedence over the DynamicBinder

    - by rudimenter
    Hi I Have a class which implement IDynamicMetaObjectProvider I implement the BindGetMember Method from DynamicMetaObject. Now when i Generate a dynamic Object and Access a property every call gets implicit passed through the BindGetMember Method. I want that at first the language Binder get his chance before my code comes in. It is somehow doable with "binder.FallbackGetMember" but i am not sure how the expression has to look like. I call here dynamic com=CommandFactory.GetCommand(); com.testprop; //expected: "test"; but "test2" comes back public class Command : System.Dynamic.IDynamicMetaObjectProvider { public string testprop { get { return "test"; } } public object GetValue(string name) { return "test2"; } System.Dynamic.DynamicMetaObject System.Dynamic.IDynamicMetaObjectProvider.GetMetaObject(System.Linq.Expressions.Expression parameter) { return new MetaCommand(parameter, this); } private class MetaCommand : System.Dynamic.DynamicMetaObject { public MetaCommand(Expression expression, Command value) : base(expression, System.Dynamic.BindingRestrictions.Empty, value) { } public override System.Dynamic.DynamicMetaObject BindGetMember(System.Dynamic.GetMemberBinder binder) { var self = this.Expression; var bag = (Command)base.Value; Expression target; target = Expression.Call( Expression.Convert(self, typeof(Command)), typeof(Command).GetMethod("GetValue"), Expression.Constant(binder.Name) ); var restrictions = BindingRestrictions .GetInstanceRestriction(self, bag); return new DynamicMetaObject(target, restrictions); } #endregion } }

    Read the article

  • NHibernate Criteria question

    - by Jeneatte Jolie
    I have a person object, which can have unlimited number of first names. So the first names are another object. ie person --- name             --- name             --- name What I want to do is write an nhiberate query using which will get me a person who has certain names. so one query might be find someone whose names are alison and jane and philippa, then next query may be one to find someone whose names are alison and jane. I only want to return people who have all the names I'm search on. So far I've got ICriteria criteria = session.CreateCriteria(typeof (Person)); criteria.CreateAlias("Names", "name"); ICriterion expression = null; foreach (string name in namesToFind) { if (expression == null) { expression = Expression.Like("name.Value", "%" + name + "%"); } else { expression = Expression.Or( expression, Expression.Like("name.Value", "%" + name + "%")); } } if (expression != null) criteria.Add(expression); But this is returning every person with ANY of the names I'm searching on, not ALL the names. Can anyone help me out with this? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Why should I use $[ EXPR ] instead of $(( EXPR ))?

    - by qdii
    On the paragraph explaining arithmetic expansion, Bash's user guide uncovers 2 different ways of evaluating an expression, the first one uses $((?EXPRESSION?)) and the second one uses $[?EXPRESSION?]. The two ways seem pretty similar as the only difference I have found is: $[?EXPRESSION?] will only calculate the result of EXPRESSION, and do no tests: Yet, I am intrigued because the same document recommends using $[?EXPRESSION?] rather than $((?EXPRESSION?)). Wherever possible, Bash users should try to use the syntax with square brackets: Why would you want that if less tests are being done?

    Read the article

  • Inside the DLR – Invoking methods

    - by Simon Cooper
    So, we’ve looked at how a dynamic call is represented in a compiled assembly, and how the dynamic lookup is performed at runtime. The last piece of the puzzle is how the resolved method gets invoked, and that is the subject of this post. Invoking methods As discussed in my previous posts, doing a full lookup and bind at runtime each and every single time the callsite gets invoked would be far too slow to be usable. The results obtained from the callsite binder must to be cached, along with a series of conditions to determine whether the cached result can be reused. So, firstly, how are the conditions represented? These conditions can be anything; they are determined entirely by the semantics of the language the binder is representing. The binder has to be able to return arbitary code that is then executed to determine whether the conditions apply or not. Fortunately, .NET 4 has a neat way of representing arbitary code that can be easily combined with other code – expression trees. All the callsite binder has to return is an expression (called a ‘restriction’) that evaluates to a boolean, returning true when the restriction passes (indicating the corresponding method invocation can be used) and false when it does’t. If the bind result is also represented in an expression tree, these can be combined easily like so: if ([restriction is true]) { [invoke cached method] } Take my example from my previous post: public class ClassA { public static void TestDynamic() { CallDynamic(new ClassA(), 10); CallDynamic(new ClassA(), "foo"); } public static void CallDynamic(dynamic d, object o) { d.Method(o); } public void Method(int i) {} public void Method(string s) {} } When the Method(int) method is first bound, along with an expression representing the result of the bind lookup, the C# binder will return the restrictions under which that bind can be reused. In this case, it can be reused if the types of the parameters are the same: if (thisArg.GetType() == typeof(ClassA) && arg1.GetType() == typeof(int)) { thisClassA.Method(i); } Caching callsite results So, now, it’s up to the callsite to link these expressions returned from the binder together in such a way that it can determine which one from the many it has cached it should use. This caching logic is all located in the System.Dynamic.UpdateDelegates class. It’ll help if you’ve got this type open in a decompiler to have a look yourself. For each callsite, there are 3 layers of caching involved: The last method invoked on the callsite. All methods that have ever been invoked on the callsite. All methods that have ever been invoked on any callsite of the same type. We’ll cover each of these layers in order Level 1 cache: the last method called on the callsite When a CallSite<T> object is first instantiated, the Target delegate field (containing the delegate that is called when the callsite is invoked) is set to one of the UpdateAndExecute generic methods in UpdateDelegates, corresponding to the number of parameters to the callsite, and the existance of any return value. These methods contain most of the caching, invoke, and binding logic for the callsite. The first time this method is invoked, the UpdateAndExecute method finds there aren’t any entries in the caches to reuse, and invokes the binder to resolve a new method. Once the callsite has the result from the binder, along with any restrictions, it stitches some extra expressions in, and replaces the Target field in the callsite with a compiled expression tree similar to this (in this example I’m assuming there’s no return value): if ([restriction is true]) { [invoke cached method] return; } if (callSite._match) { _match = false; return; } else { UpdateAndExecute(callSite, arg0, arg1, ...); } Woah. What’s going on here? Well, this resulting expression tree is actually the first level of caching. The Target field in the callsite, which contains the delegate to call when the callsite is invoked, is set to the above code compiled from the expression tree into IL, and then into native code by the JIT. This code checks whether the restrictions of the last method that was invoked on the callsite (the ‘primary’ method) match, and if so, executes that method straight away. This means that, the next time the callsite is invoked, the first code that executes is the restriction check, executing as native code! This makes this restriction check on the primary cached delegate very fast. But what if the restrictions don’t match? In that case, the second part of the stitched expression tree is executed. What this section should be doing is calling back into the UpdateAndExecute method again to resolve a new method. But it’s slightly more complicated than that. To understand why, we need to understand the second and third level caches. Level 2 cache: all methods that have ever been invoked on the callsite When a binder has returned the result of a lookup, as well as updating the Target field with a compiled expression tree, stitched together as above, the callsite puts the same compiled expression tree in an internal list of delegates, called the rules list. This list acts as the level 2 cache. Why use the same delegate? Stitching together expression trees is an expensive operation. You don’t want to do it every time the callsite is invoked. Ideally, you would create one expression tree from the binder’s result, compile it, and then use the resulting delegate everywhere in the callsite. But, if the same delegate is used to invoke the callsite in the first place, and in the caches, that means each delegate needs two modes of operation. An ‘invoke’ mode, for when the delegate is set as the value of the Target field, and a ‘match’ mode, used when UpdateAndExecute is searching for a method in the callsite’s cache. Only in the invoke mode would the delegate call back into UpdateAndExecute. In match mode, it would simply return without doing anything. This mode is controlled by the _match field in CallSite<T>. The first time the callsite is invoked, _match is false, and so the Target delegate is called in invoke mode. Then, if the initial restriction check fails, the Target delegate calls back into UpdateAndExecute. This method sets _match to true, then calls all the cached delegates in the rules list in match mode to try and find one that passes its restrictions, and invokes it. However, there needs to be some way for each cached delegate to inform UpdateAndExecute whether it passed its restrictions or not. To do this, as you can see above, it simply re-uses _match, and sets it to false if it did not pass the restrictions. This allows the code within each UpdateAndExecute method to check for cache matches like so: foreach (T cachedDelegate in Rules) { callSite._match = true; cachedDelegate(); // sets _match to false if restrictions do not pass if (callSite._match) { // passed restrictions, and the cached method was invoked // set this delegate as the primary target to invoke next time callSite.Target = cachedDelegate; return; } // no luck, try the next one... } Level 3 cache: all methods that have ever been invoked on any callsite with the same signature The reason for this cache should be clear – if a method has been invoked through a callsite in one place, then it is likely to be invoked on other callsites in the codebase with the same signature. Rather than living in the callsite, the ‘global’ cache for callsite delegates lives in the CallSiteBinder class, in the Cache field. This is a dictionary, typed on the callsite delegate signature, providing a RuleCache<T> instance for each delegate signature. This is accessed in the same way as the level 2 callsite cache, by the UpdateAndExecute methods. When a method is matched in the global cache, it is copied into the callsite and Target cache before being executed. Putting it all together So, how does this all fit together? Like so (I’ve omitted some implementation & performance details): That, in essence, is how the DLR performs its dynamic calls nearly as fast as statically compiled IL code. Extensive use of expression trees, compiled to IL and then into native code. Multiple levels of caching, the first of which executes immediately when the dynamic callsite is invoked. And a clever re-use of compiled expression trees that can be used in completely different contexts without being recompiled. All in all, a very fast and very clever reflection caching mechanism.

    Read the article

  • Regular expression to validate name n language other then english like Spanish..

    - by BT
    Hi, how can i write a regular expression to validate name field in a multilingual web application, i want to validate the name field for non-English languages e.g. Spanish or German, and we need to make sure that no one enter digits or special characters. I'm using .NET. I believe we can't use expression as below for non-English language. ^[a-zA-Z]{1,20}$ Any help will be highly appreciated!

    Read the article

  • How do you make a regular expression that matches a word with one randomly inserted character?

    - by Dfowj
    Hey all, i want to use a regular expression to match a word with one specified character randomly placed within it. I also want to keep that 'base' word's characters in their original order. For example, with the 'base' word of test and the specified character of 'y', i want the regular expression to match all the following, and ONLY the following: ytest, tyest, teyst, tesyt, testy Incase it matters, im working in javascript and using the dojo toolkit. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • .Net lambda expression-- where did this parameter come from?

    - by larryq
    I'm a lambda newbie, so if I'm missing vital information in my description please tell me. I'll keep the example as simple as possible. I'm going over someone else's code and they have one class inheriting from another. Here's the derived class first, along with the lambda expression I'm having trouble understanding: class SampleViewModel : ViewModelBase { private ICustomerStorage storage = ModelFactory<ICustomerStorage>.Create(); public ICustomer CurrentCustomer { get { return (ICustomer)GetValue(CurrentCustomerProperty); } set { SetValue(CurrentCustomerProperty, value); } } private int quantitySaved; public int QuantitySaved { get { return quantitySaved; } set { if (quantitySaved != value) { quantitySaved = value; NotifyPropertyChanged(p => QuantitySaved); //where does 'p' come from? } } } public static readonly DependencyProperty CurrentCustomerProperty; static SampleViewModel() { CurrentCustomerProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("CurrentCustomer", typeof(ICustomer), typeof(SampleViewModel), new UIPropertyMetadata(ModelFactory<ICustomer>.Create())); } //more method definitions follow.. Note the call to NotifyPropertyChanged(p => QuantitySaved) bit above. I don't understand where the "p" is coming from. Here's the base class: public abstract class ViewModelBase : DependencyObject, INotifyPropertyChanged, IXtremeMvvmViewModel { public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged; protected virtual void NotifyPropertyChanged<T>(Expression<Func<ViewModelBase, T>> property) { MvvmHelper.NotifyPropertyChanged(property, PropertyChanged); } } There's a lot in there that's not germane to the question I'm sure, but I wanted to err on the side of inclusiveness. The problem is, I don't understand where the 'p' parameter is coming from, and how the compiler knows to (evidently?) fill in a type value of ViewModelBase from thin air? For fun I changed the code from 'p' to 'this', since SampleViewModel inherits from ViewModelBase, but I was met with a series of compiler errors, the first one of which statedInvalid expression term '=>' This confused me a bit since I thought that would work. Can anyone explain what's happening here?

    Read the article

  • How to detect what allowed character in current Regular Expression by using JavaScript?

    - by Soul_Master
    In my web application, I create some framework that use to bind model data to control on page. Each model property has some rule like string length, not null and regular expression. Before submit page, framework validate any binded control with defined rules. So, I want to detect what character that is allowed in each regular expression rule like the following example. "^[0-9]$" allow only digit characters like 1, 2, 3. "^[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z_-0-9]+$" allow only a-z, - and _ characters However, this function should not care about grouping, positioning of allowed character. It just tells about possible characters only. By the way, complex regular expression like find two words near(\bword1\W+(?:\w+\W+){1,6}?word2\b) must be ignore to verify and it should return any characters is possible. Do you have any idea for creating this function? PS. I know it easy to create specified function like numeric only for allowing only digit characters. But I need share/reuse same piece of code both data tier(contains all model validator) and UI tier without modify anything. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Which is more maintainable -- boolean assignment via if/else or boolean expression?

    - by Bret Walker
    Which would be considered more maintainable? if (a == b) c = true; else c = false; or c = (a == b); I've tried looking in Code Complete, but can't find an answer. I think the first is more readable (you can literally read it out loud), which I also think makes it more maintainable. The second one certainly makes more sense and reduces code, but I'm not sure it's as maintainable for C# developers (I'd expect to see this idiom more in, for example, Python).

    Read the article

  • Python 3.4 adds re.fullmatch()

    - by Jan Goyvaerts
    Python 3.4 does not bring any changes to its regular expression syntax compared to previous 3.x releases. It does add one new function to the re module called fullmatch(). This function takes a regular expression and a subject string as its parameters. It returns True if the regular expression can match the string entirely. It returns False if the string cannot be matched or if it can only be matched partially. This is useful when using a regular expression to validate user input. Do note that fullmatch() will return True if the subject string is the empty string and the regular expression can find zero-length matches. A zero-length match of a zero-length string is a complete match. So if you want to check whether the user entered a sequence of digits, use \d+ rather than \d* as the regex.

    Read the article

  • Regular Expression for any number divisible by 60 using C# .Net ?

    - by Steve Johnson
    Hi there, I need to apply validation on input time intervals that are taken in as seconds. Now i am not really good at Regular expressions. So can any body help making a regular expression that can test whether a number is divisible by 60. I was wondering if i could use to test one that check that the number is divisible by 10 and then check whether the same is divisible by 6. For number divisible by 10 here [\d*0] is the expression i guess. Please correct me if i am wrong. Hope somebody solves my problem. Thanks

    Read the article

  • What is the MM/DD/YYYY regular expression and how do I use it in php?

    - by zeckdude
    I found the regular expression for MM/DD/YYYY at http://www.regular-expressions.info/regexbuddy/datemmddyyyy.html but I don't think I am using it correctly. Here's my code: $date_regex = '(0[1-9]|1[012])[- /.](0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[- /.](19|20)\d\d'; $test_date = '03/22/2010'; if(preg_match($date_regex, $test_date)) { echo 'this date is formatted correctly'; } else { echo 'this date is not formatted correctly'; } When I run this, it still echoes 'this date is not formatted correctly', when it should be saying the opposite. How do I set this regular expression up in php?

    Read the article

  • Can a repeated piece of regular expression create multiple groups? Such as this example...

    - by Yousui
    Hi guys, I'm using RUBY 's regular expression to deal with text such as ${1:aaa|bbbb} ${233:aaa | bbbb | ccc ccccc } ${34: aaa | bbbb | cccccccc |d} ${343: aaa | bbbb | cccccccc |dddddd ddddddddd} ${3443:a aa|bbbb|cccccccc|d} ${353:aa a| b b b b | c c c c c c c c | dddddd} I want to get the trimed text between each pipe line. For example, for the first line of my upper example, I want to get the result aaa and bbbb, for the second line, I want aaa, bbbb and ccc ccccc. Now I have wrote a piece of regular expression and a piece of ruby code to test it: array = "${33:aaa|bbbb|cccccccc}".scan(/\$\{\s*(\d+)\s*:(\s*[^\|]+\s*)(?:\|(\s*[^\|]+\s*))+\}/) puts array Now my problem is the (?:\|(\s*[^\|]+\s*))+ part can't create multiple groups. I don't know how to solve this problem, because the number of text I need in each line is variable. Anyone can help? Great thanks.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58  | Next Page >