Search Results

Search found 4183 results on 168 pages for 'provider'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 51/168 | < Previous Page | 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58  | Next Page >

  • SEO Optimization Services - Finding the Best Guide

    What should you look for in a company that offers SEO optimization services? It is an all-important question that you need to answer when choosing a service provider for all your SEO optimization requirements. As you read on, you will find out three key qualities that you need to look for when choosing an SEO optimization service that is a perfect fit for you.

    Read the article

  • Microsoft Office Communications Server 2007 R2 – Part II

    Once you have set up Office Communication Server 2007 R2 to provide IM within the rganisation, the next stage is to provide full telephony by setting up the OCS Mediation Server and the OCS Edge Server to connect ‘outside’ the organization, and escpecially to a SIP trunk provider of Internet phone services.

    Read the article

  • Forwarding naked domain to www [duplicate]

    - by mravec
    This question already has an answer here: Why is www. working but no-www is not? 1 answer I successfully mapped my www.mydomain.com to my Google site (as described here). However I would like to forward also my naked domain (mydomain.com) to end up in www.mydomain.com. I assume I should modify 'A' DNS record in my provider but what IP should I point it to?

    Read the article

  • Search Engine Optimization - What is It?

    Search Engine Optimization or SEO, refers to the active practice of optimizing a web site through various techniques, in order to increase the traffic a website receives from search engines such as Google. When looking for a product, business or service provider, it is now as easy as typing in some key words into the search engine and getting instant results.

    Read the article

  • The Genius of Website Creators

    This is an age where the internet rules the trend of the commercial world. When you decide to buy a product or even take the assistance of a service provider the first thing that would come to mind is looking over the internet and searching for the same.

    Read the article

  • SEO Reports - The Importance of Having Proper Reporting

    SEO is a very dynamic and complex process and as important it is for a company to provide the service it is equally important to report it correctly because a webmaster can only know what's going on if he/she gets a detailed report of the status. In case you are opting for an SEO provider it is crucial for you to know the update on the task and therefore reporting becomes a core aspect of an SEO service.

    Read the article

  • Dental SEO - What Exactly Are Discount Dental Plans?

    A dental plan is a type of club you join where we have a portion of providers and consumers. In a discounted plan, the providers have agreed to supply the services at a discounted rate. Being a consumer, one simply has to display his or her membership card while visiting the service provider. These types of discounted plans do not purport to insurance in any way, they're just discount programs.

    Read the article

  • LogonUser function (2 replies)

    I am trying to access a server using LogonUser function as follows Dim returnValue As Boolean LogonUser(Domain\UserName, MachineName, password, LOGON32 LOGON NEW CREDENTIALS, LOGON32 PROVIDER DEFAULT, tokenHandle) I get a token, and seems to me that I get authenticated. However when I execute the following Dim AllCountersCategories As PerformanceCounterCategory() PerformanceCounterCategory.GetCate...

    Read the article

  • What does this SAP error mean? recv104 NiIReadrecv nixxi.cp5087

    - by Techboy
    I have an SAP BI Portal system and an SAP BW system. In the Visual Administrator of the BI Portal, section 'JCo RFC Provider' I have created some RFC listeners. In the SAP BW system (in transaction SM59), I have created, tested and activated the relevant RFC connections. When I start a JCo RFC Provider in the BI Portal the BW system that it communicates with produces these errors (displayed from SAP transaction SM21): Operating system call recv failed (error no. 104 ) Module nam Line Error text Caller.... Reason/cal nixxi.cp 5087 recv104 NiIRead recv Documentation for system log message Q0 I : The specified operating system call was returned with an error. For communication calls (receive, send, etc) often the cause of errors are network problems. It could also be a configuration problem at operating system level. (file cannot be opened, no space in the file system etc.). Additional specifications for error number 104 Name for errno number E_UNKNOWN_NO The meaning of the value stored in 'errno' is platform-dependent. The value which occurred here is unknown to the SysLog system. Either there is an incorrect error number in the SysLog message, or the tables TSLE2 or TSLE3 are not completely maintained. Technical details File Offset RecFm System log type Grp N variable message data 6 410220 m Error (Function,Module,Row) Q0 I recv104 NiIReadrecv nixxi.cp5087 There is plenty of space left in the file system, the servers can ping each other and there is no firewall between the servers. The tables (TSLE2 or TSLE3) mentioned in the error message do not provide any additional information. Please can you tell me if this error message refers to something specific, or if it is generic: recv104 NiIReadrecv nixxi.cp5087

    Read the article

  • Linked server problem on SQL Server 2005

    - by BradyKelly
    I have a weird issue and I hope someone can steer me in the right direction for resolving this please. When I execute the following query against a linked server, I get the following error. I can connect to the server in SSMS as a separate server, and execute a similar query against its Deposits table. The nn.nn is my own replacement to avoid broadcasting our server addresses. The query: select td.Batch , td.DateTimeDeposited from Deposits cd left join [172.nn.nn.32\sqlexpress].Terminal.dbo.Deposits td on cd.DateTimeDeposited = td.DateTimeDeposited The error: OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "172.nn.nn.11\sqlexpress" returned message "Login timeout expired". OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "172.nn.nn.11\sqlexpress" returned message "An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections.". Msg 65535, Level 16, State 1, Line 0 SQL Network Interfaces: Error Locating Server/Instance Specified [xFFFFFFFF]. Notice how the error is about server 172.nn.nn.11 and not 172.nn.nn.32. SOLVED (STUPID ME): Somebody had added an extra bit to my query that was scrolled off-screen and was querying the 17.nn.nn.11 server.

    Read the article

  • Cmdlets for AD CS deployment: Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority cmdlet failing when attempting to install an offline policy CA

    - by red888
    I installed an offline root CA without issue using this command: Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority ` -OverwriteExistingKey ` <#In the case of a re-installation#> ` -AllowAdministratorInteraction ` -CACommonName ` "LAB Corporate Root CA" ` -CADistinguishedNameSuffix ` 'O=LAB Inc.,C=US' ` -CAType ` StandaloneRootCA ` -CryptoProviderName ` "RSA#Microsoft Software Key Storage Provider" ` -HashAlgorithmName ` SHA256 ` -KeyLength ` 2048 ` -ValidityPeriod ` Years ` -ValidityPeriodUnits ` 20 ` -DatabaseDirectory ` 'E:\CAData\CertDB' ` -LogDirectory ` 'E:\CAData\CertLog' ` -Verbose I installed the root CA's cert and CRl on the policy CA, installed the AD CS binaries, and attempted to run this command to install the policy CA and export a req file: Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority ` -OverwriteExistingKey ` <#In the case of a re-installation#> ` -AllowAdministratorInteraction ` -CACommonName ` "LAB Corporate Policy Internal CA" ` -CADistinguishedNameSuffix ` 'O=LAB Inc.,C=US' ` -CAType ` StandaloneSubordinateCA ` -ParentCA ` rootca ` -OutputCertRequestFile ` 'e:\polca-int.req' ` -CryptoProviderName ` "RSA#Microsoft Software Key Storage Provider" ` -HashAlgorithmName ` SHA256 ` -KeyLength ` 2048 ` -ValidityPeriod ` Years ` -ValidityPeriodUnits ` 10 ` -DatabaseDirectory ` 'E:\CAData\CertDB' ` -LogDirectory ` 'E:\CAData\CertLog' ` -Verbose When doing this I receive the following error: VERBOSE: Calling InitializeDefaults method on the setup object. Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority : At line:1 char:1 + Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority ` + ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + CategoryInfo : InvalidArgument: (:) [Install-AdcsCertificationA uthority], CertificationAuthoritySetupException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : ValidateParameters,Microsoft.CertificateServices .Deployment.Commands.CA.InstallADCSCertificationAuthority Is there a parameter I am entering incorrectly or something?

    Read the article

  • Could not continue scan with NOLOCK due to data movement during installation

    - by dbdev1
    I am running Windows Server 2008 Standard Edition R2 x64 and I installed SQL Server 2008 Developer Edition. All of the preliminary checks run fine (Apart from a warning about Windows Firewall and opening ports which is unrelated to this and shouldn't be an issue - I can open those ports). Half way through the actual installation, I get a popup with this error: Could not continue scan with NOLOCK due to data movement. The installation still runs to completion when I press ok. However, at the end, it states that the following services "failed": database engine services sql server replication full-text search reporting services How do I know if this actually means that anything from my installation (which is on a clean Windows Server setup - nothing else on there, no previous SQL Servers, no upgrades, etc) is missing? I know from my programming experience that locks are for concurrency control and the Microsoft help on this issue points to changing my query's lock/transactions in a certain way to fix the issue. But I am not touching any queries? Also, now that I have installed the app, when I login, I keep getting this message: TITLE: Connect to Server ------------------------------ Cannot connect to MSSQLSERVER. ------------------------------ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 67) For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=67&LinkId=20476 ------------------------------ BUTTONS: OK ------------------------------ I went into the Configuration Manager and enabled named pipes and restarted the service (this is something I have done before as this message is common and not serious). I have disabled Windows Firewall temporarily. I have checked the instance name against the error logs. Please advise on both of these errors. I think these two errors are related. Thanks

    Read the article

  • OpenLDAP mirror mode replication failing with TLS behind a load balancer

    - by Lynn Owens
    I have two OpenLDAP servers that are both running TLS. They are: ldap1.mydomain.com ldap2.mydomain.com I also have a load balancer cluster with a dns name of it's own: ldap.mydomain.com The SSL certificate has a CN of ldap.mydomain.com, with SANs of ldap1.mydomain.com and ldap2.mydomain.com. Everything works... Except mirror mode replication. My mirror mode replication is setup like this: ldap.conf TLS_REQCERT allow cn=config.ldif olcServerID: 1 ldap://ldap1.mydomain.com olcServerID: 2 ldap://ldap2.mydomain.com On ldap1, olcDatabase{1}hdb.ldif olcMirrorMode: TRUE olcSyncrepl: {0}rid=001 provider=ldap://ldap2.mydomain.com bindmethod=simple bindmethod=simple binddn="cn=me,dc=mydomain,dc=com" credentials="REDACTED" starttls=yes searchbase="dc=mydomain,dc=com" schemachecking=on type=refreshAndPersist retry="60 +" On ldap2, olcDatabase{1}hdb.ldif olcMirrorMode: TRUE olcSyncrepl: {0}rid=001 provider=ldap://ldap1.mydomain.com bindmethod=simple bindmethod=simple binddn="cn=me,dc=mydomain,dc=com" credentials="REDACTED" starttls=yes searchbase="dc=mydomain,dc=com" schemachecking=on type=refreshAndPersist retry="60 +" Here's the errors I'm getting in syslog: Dec 1 21:05:01 ldap1 slapd[6800]: slap_client_connect: URI=ldap://ldap2.mydomain.com DN="cn=me,dc=mydomain,dc=com" ldap_sasl_bind_s failed (-1) Dec 1 21:05:01 ldap1 slapd[6800]: do_syncrepl: rid=001 rc -1 retrying Dec 1 21:05:08 ldap1 slapd[6800]: conn=1111 fd=20 ACCEPT from IP=ldap.mydomain.com:2295 (IP=ldap1.mydomain.com:636) Dec 1 21:05:08 ldap1 slapd[6800]: conn=1111 fd=20 closed (TLS negotiation failure) Any ideas? I've been working on OpenLdap for way too long now.

    Read the article

  • Could not continue scan with NOLOCK due to data movement during installation

    - by dbdev1
    Hi, I am running Windows Server 2008 Standard Edition R2 x64 and I installed SQL Server 2008 Developer Edition. All of the preliminary checks run fine (Apart from a warning about Windows Firewall and opening ports which is unrelated to this and shouldn't be an issue - I can open those ports). Half way through the actual installation, I get a popup with this error: Could not continue scan with NOLOCK due to data movement. The installation still runs to completion when I press ok. However, at the end, it states that the following services "failed": database engine services sql server replication full-text search reporting services How do I know if this actually means that anything from my installation (which is on a clean Windows Server setup - nothing else on there, no previous SQL Servers, no upgrades, etc) is missing? I know from my programming experience that locks are for concurrency control and the Microsoft help on this issue points to changing my query's lock/transactions in a certain way to fix the issue. But I am not touching any queries? Also, now that I have installed the app, when I login, I keep getting this message: TITLE: Connect to Server Cannot connect to MSSQLSERVER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 67) For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=67&LinkId=20476 BUTTONS: OK I went into the Configuration Manager and enabled named pipes and restarted the service (this is something I have done before as this message is common and not serious). I have disabled Windows Firewall temporarily. I have checked the instance name against the error logs. Please advise on both of these errors. I think these two errors are related. Thanks

    Read the article

  • PostgreSQL update problems with uuid

    - by kdl
    Hi, I am trying to run yum update on my CentOS 5.2 box and keep getting this message: Missing Dependency: libossp-uuid.so.15 is needed by package postgresql-contrib I ran yum update postgresql separately and now it's 8.3.8. I also downloaded uuid-1.6.2 and built it from source, but I still get the same result. yum update -d6 uuid gives me this at the end: --> Running transaction check ---> Package uuid.i386 0:1.6.1-3.el5.kb set to be updated Checking deps for uuid.i386 0-1.6.1-3.el5.kb - u Checking deps for uuid.i386 0-1.5.1-4.rhel5 - None postgresql-contrib requires: libossp-uuid.so.15 --> Processing Dependency: libossp-uuid.so.15 for package: postgresql-contrib Needed Require is not a package name. Looking up: libossp-uuid.so.15 Potential Provider: uuid.i386 0:1.5.1-4.rhel5 Mode is u for provider of libossp-uuid.so.15: uuid.i386 0:1.5.1-4.rhel5 Mode for pkg providing libossp-uuid.so.15: u Cannot find an update path for dep for: libossp-uuid.so.15 Searching pkgSack for dep: libossp-uuid.so.15 Potential match for libossp-uuid.so.15 from uuid - 1.5.1-4.rhel5.i386 Matched uuid - 1.5.1-4.rhel5.i386 to require for libossp-uuid.so.15 uuid - 1.5.1-4.rhel5.i386 is in providing packages but it is already installed, removing. --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependency Process ending Error: Missing Dependency: libossp-uuid.so.15 is needed by package postgresql-contrib How can I resolve this situation? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Self-hosting vs. Budget hosting - What are the economics?

    - by cdonner
    My current hosting provider (shared Linux, unlimited domains, < $10 per month, with about 20 sites) has been giving me a lot of grief lately. I am contemplating to just ditch them and repurpose the old Sun V20z that is sitting in my basement rack, and move the hosting in-house, literally. My math goes as follows: my company pays up to $80 a months for my home internet service, which would cover the upgrade from currently Fios to Comcast business internet with 5 static IPs. So this comes free. running the server will cost me about $180/year at the current rate of approx. $.2/kWh my time is free So, it seems that the my net cost of doing this would be about $80 anually, plus the work that goes into setup and maintenance. I will have to get email hosting somewhere, which I do not want to do myself. On the other side of the balance sheet, I'd likely get better uptime than my provider based on recent stats, will not get suspended and don't have to spend hours with customer support. Overall, I am not convinced. Has anybody actually done that? What was your experience, and did it pay off?

    Read the article

  • DrayTek 2820 configuration using public IP addresses

    - by Kev
    I have a /29 range of public IP addresses assigned to me by my ISP. I'm trying to configure a SIP VOIP handset to register with my VOIP provider who recommend using public IP addresses rather than NAT. I have a DrayTek 2820 router flashed with the latest firmware and have configured my router as per DrayTek's FAQ at: How do I use a public subnet on the LAN (non-NAT operation ) ? My IP range is: xx.xx.94.16 -> xx.xx.94.23 This gives a usable range of: xx.xx.94.17 -> xx.xx.94.22 My router's public IP address is: xx.xx.94.17, the SIP VOIP handset is allocated xx.xx.94.18. I have a second internet connection and via that I can ping the handset. However for some reason I can't seem to get it to register with the provider. I tried adding a new Firewall filter to pass through from WAN to LAN: Source: ANY, Destination: xx.xx.94.18, UDP - Ports 1024 -> 65535 Out of interest I also tried opening port 80 to see if I could browse to the phone's admin web interface but no joy. I know that my ISP aren't blocking inbound service ports because I NAT Port Forwarded port 80 to one of my internal web servers and it rendered a test page I had set up. All the NAT settings are reset to factory defaults, i.e. there are no Port Redirection, DMZ Host, Open Ports or Address Mappings configured. The handset I'm using is a GrandStream GXP-2000. Is there anything else I should be doing?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58  | Next Page >