Search Results

Search found 11297 results on 452 pages for 'delete operator'.

Page 53/452 | < Previous Page | 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60  | Next Page >

  • delete function and upload

    - by Jesper Petersen
    it must be said that I download the database and all my function is in class. That's how I was incredible pleased function and think they are nice .. That's how I'm going to build a gallery where the id of the upload to the site if it fits with the id_session is log in page, you have the option to delete it. and so it must just go back to / latest pictures / when it delete it from the folder and database. but it comes up with an error as you can see here; Fatal error: Call to a member function bind_param () on a non-object in / home / jesperbo / public_html / mebe.dk / function / function.php on line 411 It is such that I am also in the process of building an upload system where the underlying database and make it smaller after what I have now set it and when it did the 2 things must send me back to / latest-images / but it do not reach the only available picture up on the server and do it with the picture but it will not go back in some way at all. So to / latest-images / Where wrong with it to delete, etc. I lie just here, $stm1->bind_param('i', $id_gallery); function img_slet_indhold(){ if($_SESSION["logged_in"] = true && $_SESSION["rank"] == '1' || $_SESSION["rank"] == 2) { if($stmt = $this->mysqli->prepare('SELECT `title` FROM `gallery` WHERE `id_gallery` = ?')) { $stm1->bind_param('i', $id_gallery); $id_gallery = $_GET["id_gallery"]; $stm1->execute(); $stm1->store_result(); $stm1->bind_result($title); $UploadDir = "/gallery/"; //ligger i toppen af documentet, evt som en define if($stm1->fetch()) { $tmpfile = $UploadDir . "" . $title; if(file_exists($tmpfile)) { unlink($tmpfile); } $tmpfile = $UploadDir . "lille/" . $title; if(file_exists($tmpfile)) { unlink($tmpfile); } $tmpfile = $UploadDir . "store/" . $title; if(file_exists($tmpfile)) { unlink($tmpfile); } } $stm1->close(); } else { /* Der er opstået en fejl */ echo 'Der opstod en fejl i erklæringen: ' . $mysqli->error; } } if($stmt = $this->mysqli->prepare('DELETE FROM `gallery` WHERE `id_gallery` = ?' )) { $stmt->bind_param('i', $id); $id = $_GET["id_gallery"]; $stmt->execute(); header('Location: /nyeste-billeder/'); $stmt->close(); } else { /* Der er opstået en fejl */ echo 'Der opstod en fejl i erklæringen: ' . $mysqli->error; } } So into the file as it should delete from, I have chosen to do so here; <?php session_start(); require_once ("function/function.php"); $mebe = new mebe; $db = $mebe->db_c(); error_reporting(E_ERROR); $img_slet_indhold = $mebe->img_slet_indhold(); ?> So when I upload image to folder and database, and just after can be returned when uploading function img_indhold(){ if($_SESSION["logged_in"] = true && $_SESSION["rank"] == '1' || $_SESSION["rank"] == 2) { include "function/class.upload.php"; $handle = new Upload($_FILES["filename"]); if($handle->uploaded) { //lidt mere store billeder $handle->image_resize = true; $handle->image_ratio_y = true; $handle->image_x = 220; $handle->Process("gallery/store"); //til profil billede lign.. $handle->image_resize = true; $handle->image_ratio_crop = true; $handle->image_y = 115; $handle->image_x = 100; $handle->Process("gallery"); //til profil billede lign.. $handle->image_resize = true; $handle->image_ratio_crop = true; $handle->image_y = 75; $handle->image_x = 75; $handle->Process("gallery/lille"); $pb = $handle->file_dst_name; } if($stmt = $this->mysqli->prepare('INSERT INTO `gallery` (`title`, `id_bruger`) VALUES (?, ?)')) { $stmt->bind_param('si', $title, $id_bruger); $title = $pb; $id_bruger = $_SESSION["id"]; $stmt->execute(); header('Location: /nyeste-billeder/'); $stmt->close(); } } } So when I call it on the page when it is required to do so do it like this; <?php session_start(); require_once ("function/function.php"); $mebe = new mebe; $db = $mebe->db_c(); error_reporting(E_ERROR); $img_slet_indhold = $mebe->img_slet_indhold(); ?> it is here as to when I will upload to the site and show gallery / pictures on the page function vise_img(){ if ($stmt = $this->mysqli->prepare('SELECT `id_gallery`, `title`, `id_bruger` FROM `gallery` ORDER BY `gallery`.`id_gallery` DESC')) { $stmt->execute(); $stmt->store_result(); $stmt->bind_result($id_gallery, $title, $id_bruger); while ($stmt->fetch()) { echo "<div id=\"gallery_box\">"; echo "<a href=\"/profil/$id_bruger/\"><img src=\"/gallery/$title\" alt=\"\" height=\"115\" width=\"100\" border=\"0\"></a>"; if($_SESSION["logged_in"]) { if($id_bruger == $_SESSION["id"]) { echo "<ul>"; echo "<li><a href=\"/nyeste-billeder-slet/$id_gallery/\">Slet</a></li>"; echo "</ul>"; } } echo "</div>"; } /* Luk statement */ $stmt->close(); } else { /* Der er opstået en fejl */ echo 'Der opstod en fejl i erklæringen: ' . $mysqli->error; } } function upload_img(){ if($_SESSION["logged_in"] = true && $_SESSION["rank"] == '1' || $_SESSION["rank"] == 2) { ?> <form name="opslag" method="post" action="/nyeste-ok/" enctype="multipart/form-data"> <input type="file" name="filename" id="filename" onchange="checkFileExt(this)"> <input name="upload" value="Upload" id="background_indhold" onclick="return check()" type="submit"> </form> <?php } elseif ($_SESSION["logged_in"] != true && $_SESSION["rank"] != '1' || $_SESSION["rank"] != 2) { echo "<p>Du har ingen mulighed for at upload billeder på siden</p>"; } } Really hope you are able to help me further!

    Read the article

  • trying to make a simple grid-class, non-lvalue in assignment

    - by Tyrfing
    I'm implementing a simple C++ grid class. One Function it should support is accessed through round brackets, so that I can access the elements by writing mygrid(0,0). I overloaded the () operator and i am getting the error message: "non-lvalue in assignment". what I want to be able to do: //main cGrid<cA*> grid(5, 5); grid(0,0) = new cA(); excerpt of my implementation of the grid class: template class cGrid { private: T* data; int mWidth; int mHeight; public: cGrid(int width, int height) : mWidth(width), mHeight(height) { data = new T[width*height]; } ~cGrid() { delete data; } T operator ()(int x, int y) { if (x >= 0 && x <= mWidth) { if (y >= 0 && y <= mHeight) { return data[x + y * mWidth]; } } } const T &operator ()(int x, int y) const { if (x >= 0 && x <= mWidth) { if (y >= 0 && y <= mHeight) { return data[x + y * mWidth]; } } } The rest of the code deals with the implementation of an iterator and should not be releveant.

    Read the article

  • Why does this cast to Base class in virtual function give a segmentation fault?

    - by dehmann
    I want to print out a derived class using the operator<<. When I print the derived class, I want to first print its base and then its own content. But I ran into some trouble (see segfault below): class Base { public: friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const Base&); virtual void Print(std::ostream& out) const { out << "BASE!"; } }; std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& out, const Base& b) { b.Print(out); return out; } class Derived : public Base { public: virtual void Print(std::ostream& out) const { out << "My base: "; //((const Base*)this)->Print(out); // infinite, calls this fct recursively //((Base*)this)->Print(out); // segfault (from infinite loop?) ((Base)*this).Print(out); // OK out << " ... and myself."; } }; int main(int argc, char** argv){ Derived d; std::cout << d; return 0; } Why can't I cast in one of these ways? ((const Base*)this)->Print(out); // infinite, calls this fct recursively ((Base*)this)->Print(out); // segfault (from infinite loop?)

    Read the article

  • What am i doing wrong

    - by Erik Sapir
    I have the following code. I need B class to have a min priority queue of AToTime objects. AToTime have operator, and yet i receive error telling me than there is no operator matching the operands... #include <queue> #include <functional> using namespace std; class B{ //public functions public: B(); virtual ~B(); //private members private: log4cxx::LoggerPtr m_logger; class AToTime { //public functions public: AToTime(const ACE_Time_Value& time, const APtr a) : m_time(time), m_a(a){} bool operator >(const AToTime& other) { return m_time > other.m_time; } //public members - no point using any private members here public: ACE_Time_Value m_time; APtr m_a; }; priority_queue<AToTime, vector<AToTime>, greater<AToTime> > m_myMinHeap; };

    Read the article

  • User Defined Conversions in C++

    - by wash
    Recently, I was browsing through my copy of the C++ Pocket Reference from O'Reilly Media, and I was surprised when I came across a brief section and example regarding user-defined conversion for user-defined types: #include <iostream> class account { private: double balance; public: account (double b) { balance = b; } operator double (void) { return balance; } }; int main (void) { account acc(100.0); double balance = acc; std::cout << balance << std::endl; return 0; } I've been programming in C++ for awhile, and this is the first time I've ever seen this sort of operator overloading. The book's description of this subject is somewhat brief, leaving me with a few unanswered questions about this feature: Is this a particularly obscure feature? As I said, I've been programming in C++ for awhile and this is the first time I've ever come across this. I haven't had much luck finding more in-depth material regarding this. Is this relatively portable? (I'm compiling on GCC 4.1) Can user-defined conversions to user defined types be done? e.g. operator std::string () { /* code */ }

    Read the article

  • Managing a log stream in C++ in a cout-like notation

    - by Andry
    Hello! I have a class in c++ in order to write log files for an application of mine. I have already built the class and it works, it is something like this: class Logger { std::string _filename; public: void print(std::string tobeprinted); } Well, it is intuitive that, in order to print a line in the log file, for an object of Logger, it is simply necessary to do the following: Logger mylogger("myfile.log"); mylogger.print(std::string("This is a log line")); Well. Using a method approach is not the same as using a much better pattern like << is. I would like to do the following: Logger mylogger("myfile.log"); mylogger << "This is a log line"; That's all. I suppose I must overload the << operator... But overloading using this signature (the classic one): ostream& operator<<(ostream& output, const MyObj& o); But I do not have a ostream... So, should I do as follows? Logger& operator<<(Logger& output, const std::string& o); Is this the right way? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Am I deleting this properly?

    - by atch
    I have some struct: struct A { const char* name_; A* left_; A* right_; A(const char* name):name_(name), left_(nullptr), right_(nullptr){} A(const A&); //A(const A*);//ToDo A& operator=(const A&); ~A() { /*ToDo*/ }; }; /*Just to compile*/ A& A::operator=(const A& pattern) { //check for self-assignment if (this != &pattern) { void* p = new char[sizeof(A)]; } return *this; } A::A(const A& pat) { void* p = new char[sizeof(A)]; A* tmp = new (p) A("tmp"); tmp->~A(); delete tmp;//I WONDER IF HERE I SHOULD USE DIFFERENT delete[]? } int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { A a("a"); A b = a; cin.get(); return 0; } Guys I know this is far from ideal and far from finished. But please don't tell me the answer how to do it properly. I'm trying to figure it out myself. The only think I would like to know if I'm deleting my memory in proper way. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Android ListView delete row button - focus issue

    - by Max Gontar
    Hi! I have an activity with ListView and buttons below: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="fill_parent" android:orientation="vertical"> <ListView android:id="@+id/lvLamps" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="fill_parent" android:listSelector="@null" android:choiceMode="none" android:scrollbarStyle="insideInset" android:layout_weight="1.0" /> <RelativeLayout android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:orientation="horizontal" android:layout_weight="0.0"> <Button android:id="@+id/btnAdd" android:background="@null" android:drawableLeft="@drawable/btn_upgrade" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:drawableRight="@drawable/lbl_upgrade" android:textSize="0pt" android:text="" android:layout_alignParentLeft="true" android:padding="20px" /> <Button android:id="@+id/btnNext" android:background="@null" android:drawableRight="@drawable/next_btn" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:drawableLeft="@drawable/lbl_next" android:textSize="0pt" android:text="" android:layout_alignParentRight="true" android:padding="20px" android:visibility="gone" /> <ImageButton android:id="@+id/btnListExit" android:background="@null" android:src="@drawable/btn_x" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:layout_alignParentRight="true" android:padding="20px" /> </RelativeLayout> </LinearLayout> ListView row contains delete button: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:orientation="horizontal" android:focusable="true"> <RelativeLayout android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:orientation="horizontal" android:focusable="true"> <ImageButton android:id="@+id/btnRowDelete" android:src="@drawable/btn_x" android:background="@null" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:layout_alignParentLeft="true" android:padding="4px" android:focusable="true" android:focusableInTouchMode="true"/> <TextView android:id="@+id/txtLampRowFrom" android:text="123" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:textSize="6pt" android:layout_toRightOf="@id/btnRowDelete" android:focusable="false" android:textColor="@color/textColor"/> <TextView android:id="@+id/txtLampRowTo" android:text="123" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:textSize="6pt" android:layout_toRightOf="@id/btnRowDelete" android:layout_alignParentBottom="true" android:focusable="false" android:textColor="@color/textColor"/> <ImageView android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:src="@drawable/arrow_upgrade_to" android:layout_alignParentRight="true" android:layout_centerVertical="true" android:focusable="false"/> </RelativeLayout> </LinearLayout> In Adapter, Button onClickListener is set, also there are dummies to make list non-selectable: // disabling list items select public boolean areAllItemsEnabled() { return false; } public boolean isEnabled(int position) { return false; } What I want is: always show buttons in the bottom of screen after list (no matter how long it is, there should be scroll if it's too long) ListView should not be selectable, I don't want row selection row delete button should be selectable (focusable) with touch and with trackball And everything works except I can't focus row delete button with trackball (although it's working with touch). Can you help me? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • LLBLGen - DeleteMulti

    - by Neil
    I have a checkboxlist of categories, during an update, I am trying to delete all the items in list from the associate table, then insert them all (so I don't have to determine if an item already exists in the associate table and only insert newly checked items). Here is the code I have: // First we need to delete the records from ArticleTopicCategory where articleId is the id of the article we are updating List<Guid> categoriesToDelete = new List<Guid>(); foreach (Guid category in this.View.SelectedCategories) { categoriesToDelete.Add(category); } ArticleTopicCategoryCollection articleCategories = new ArticleTopicCategoryCollection(); PredicateExpression filter = new PredicateExpression(ArticleTopicCategoryFields.Id == categoriesToDelete); articleCategories.DeleteMulti(filter); 'categoriesToDelete' holds a valid list of Guid's that need to be deleted, but they are not being deleted. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Android ListView delete row button - focus issue

    - by Max Gontar
    I have an activity with ListView and buttons below: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="fill_parent" android:orientation="vertical"> <ListView android:id="@+id/lvLamps" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="fill_parent" android:listSelector="@null" android:choiceMode="none" android:scrollbarStyle="insideInset" android:layout_weight="1.0" /> <RelativeLayout android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:orientation="horizontal" android:layout_weight="0.0"> <Button android:id="@+id/btnAdd" android:background="@null" android:drawableLeft="@drawable/btn_upgrade" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:drawableRight="@drawable/lbl_upgrade" android:textSize="0pt" android:text="" android:layout_alignParentLeft="true" android:padding="20px" /> <Button android:id="@+id/btnNext" android:background="@null" android:drawableRight="@drawable/next_btn" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:drawableLeft="@drawable/lbl_next" android:textSize="0pt" android:text="" android:layout_alignParentRight="true" android:padding="20px" android:visibility="gone" /> <ImageButton android:id="@+id/btnListExit" android:background="@null" android:src="@drawable/btn_x" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:layout_alignParentRight="true" android:padding="20px" /> </RelativeLayout> </LinearLayout> ListView row contains delete button: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:orientation="horizontal" android:focusable="true"> <RelativeLayout android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:orientation="horizontal" android:focusable="true"> <ImageButton android:id="@+id/btnRowDelete" android:src="@drawable/btn_x" android:background="@null" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:layout_alignParentLeft="true" android:padding="4px" android:focusable="true" android:focusableInTouchMode="true"/> <TextView android:id="@+id/txtLampRowFrom" android:text="123" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:textSize="6pt" android:layout_toRightOf="@id/btnRowDelete" android:focusable="false" android:textColor="@color/textColor"/> <TextView android:id="@+id/txtLampRowTo" android:text="123" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:textSize="6pt" android:layout_toRightOf="@id/btnRowDelete" android:layout_alignParentBottom="true" android:focusable="false" android:textColor="@color/textColor"/> <ImageView android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:src="@drawable/arrow_upgrade_to" android:layout_alignParentRight="true" android:layout_centerVertical="true" android:focusable="false"/> </RelativeLayout> </LinearLayout> In Adapter, Button onClickListener is set, also there are dummies to make list non-selectable: // disabling list items select public boolean areAllItemsEnabled() { return false; } public boolean isEnabled(int position) { return false; } What I want is: always show buttons in the bottom of screen after list (no matter how long it is, there should be scroll if it's too long) ListView should not be selectable, I don't want row selection row delete button should be selectable (focusable) with touch and with trackball And everything works except I can't focus row delete button with trackball (although it's working with touch). Can you help me? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • JPA Cascading Delete: Setting child FK to NULL on a NOT NULL column

    - by JBristow
    I have two tables: t_promo_program and t_promo_program_param. They are represented by the following JPA entities: @Entity @Table(name = "t_promo_program") public class PromoProgram { @Id @Column(name = "promo_program_id") private Long id; @OneToMany(cascade = {CascadeType.REMOVE}) @JoinColumn(name = "promo_program_id") private List<PromoProgramParam> params; } @Entity @Table(name = "t_promo_program_param") public class PromoProgramParam { @Id @Column(name = "promo_program_param_id") private Long id; //@NotNull // This is a Hibernate annotation so that my test db gets created with the NOT NULL attribute, I'm not married to this annotation. @ManyToOne @JoinColumn(name = "PROMO_PROGRAM_ID", referencedColumnName = "promo_program_id") private PromoProgram promoProgram; } When I delete a PromoProgram, Hibernate hits my database with: update T_PROMO_PROGRAM_PARAM set promo_program_id=null where promo_program_id=? delete from t_promo_program where promo_program_id=? and last_change=? I'm at a loss for where to start looking for the source of the problem.

    Read the article

  • Where to delete model image?

    - by WesDec
    I have a Model with an image field and I want to be able to change the image using a ModelForm. When changing the image, the old image should be deleted and replaced by the new image. I have tried to do this in the clean method of the ModelForm like this: def clean(self): cleaned_data = super(ModelForm, self).clean() old_profile_image = self.instance.image if old_profile_image: old_profile_image.delete(save=False) return cleaned_data This works fine unless the file indicated by the user is not correct (for example if its not an image), which result in the image being deleted without any new images being saved. I would like to know where is the best place to delete the old image? By this I mean where can I be sure that the new image is correct before deleting the old one?

    Read the article

  • Unable to delete oldest table partition - Oracle 11g

    - by poijoi
    Hi, I'm using the 11g interval partitioning feature in one of my tables. I set it up to create 1 day partitions on a timestamp field and created a job to delete data 3 months old. When I try to delete the oldest partition I get the following error: ORA-14758: Last partition in the range section cannot be dropped I would have thought that "Last" refers to the newest partition and not the oldest. How should I interpret this error? Is there something wrong with my partitions or should I in fact keep the oldest partition there at all time? Thanks in advance, PJ

    Read the article

  • asp.net mvc making delete usercontrol information passing on and off

    - by mazhar kaunain baig
    i am creating a generalize deleteusercontrol , my aim is that on the listing page where all the records are listed when the delete is pressed i want to display the acknowledgment on the same page up the list. I had little idea to do that q1) first of all where will i place my deleteusercontrol(in the shared folder?). q2) on and off the deleteusercontrol as the acknowledgment will not be there all the time how would i be doing that on delete press. i don't want to pass any data in the querystring. q3)how would i be passing the records list id and listname to the general deleteusercontrol as it would be same for all the listing

    Read the article

  • Rails 3 nested forms with has_many :through, entry in join table dosen't get deleted after update

    - by Hadi S.
    Hi, i have a 'User' model which has a has_many relationship to a 'Number' model through a join table 'user_number' model. I use accepts_nested_attributes_for :numbers, :allow_destroy = true in the 'User' model. Everything works fine except that whenever i delete a number from a user in the edit form, the associated number is deleted correctly in the 'number' table, but not the entry in the 'user_number' join table. In the update controller action i only use this: ... if @user.update_attributes(params[:user]) ... How can i force rails to also delete the associated entry in the join table?

    Read the article

  • How to get paperclip to delete files

    - by webdestroya
    I have a model that is using Paperclip to manage the file. After I delete the model, I obviously would like the file to be deleted as well, but I cannot seem to find out how to get the file deleted using Paperclip. I have tried self.sourcefile = nil if !sourcefile.dirty? in the before_destroy def, but that had no effect. (I want to be able to have it delete the file locally when I test, and then on S3 when I use that - So i need a pure paperclip solution) Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • How to delete table rows programmatically?

    - by Donal O'Danachair
    I have a table which I am manipulating with a tableViewController (no nib, and the controller is creating the table behind the scenes) I'm trying to delete a row from the table based on its row number; I can delete it from the array I use to create the cell in cellForRowAtIndexPath, but I get a strange error if I try to do the following, which is the same code as in tableView:commitEditingStyle:forRowAtIndexPath: where it works fine NSIndexPath *indexPath = [NSIndexPath indexPathForRow:i+1 inSection:1] [self.tableView deleteRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:indexPath] withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationFade]; It gives an error -[_WebSafeForwarder forwardInvocation:] and then jumps out of the method but does not crash the app Can anyone help?

    Read the article

  • Delete all records that have no foreign key constraints

    - by Rodney Burton
    I have a SQL 2005 table with millions of rows in it that is being hit by users all day and night. This table is referenced by 20 or so other tables that have foreign key constraints. What I am needing to do on a regular basis is delete all records from this table where the "Active" field is set to false AND there are no other records in any of the child tables that reference the parent record. What is the most efficient way of doing this short of trying to delete each one at a time and letting it cause SQL errors on the ones that violate constraints? Also it is not an option to disable the constraints and I cannot cause locks on the parent table for any significant amount of time.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60  | Next Page >