Search Results

Search found 7676 results on 308 pages for 'linq extensions'.

Page 53/308 | < Previous Page | 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60  | Next Page >

• Performing multiple operations if condition is satisfied in ternary operator in linq

  - by user1575914

  I am a beginner in LINQ.I want to perform some conditional operation lik follows, (from emp in Employees let DOB=emp.BirthDate.GetValueOrDefault() let year=DOB.Year let month=DOB.Month let EmpAgeInYearsToday=DateTime.Now.Year-year let EmpAgeInMonthToday=DateTime.Now.Month-month let temp_year=(EmpAgeInYearsToday-1) let ExactNoOfMonths_temp=EmpAgeInMonthToday<0?temp_year:EmpAgeInMonthToday let ExactNoOfMonths=EmpAgeInMonthToday<0?EmpAgeInMonthToday+12&temp_year:EmpAgeInMonthToday select new{emp.EmployeeID,DOB, EmployeeAgeToday=EmpAgeInYearsToday+" Years "+ExactNoOfMonths+" Months ").Dump(); Here, let ExactNoOfMonths=EmpAgeInMonthToday<0?EmpAgeInMonthToday+12&temp_year:EmpAgeInMonthToday This part is not working. How to achieve this? How to perform multiple operations when the condition is satisfied?

  Read the article

• using regular expression / Remove special characters with linq to sql

  - by Prasad

  How can i use regular expressions with linq to sql in the asp.net mvc(C#) application? The columns in my MSSQL table (Products) has some special characters like (, - % ',.....). While searching for a product i need to search without that special chareters. For ex.: I have a product say (ABC-Camp's / One), when i search for "abccamp", it should pull the product. I am trying the query like: from p in _context.pu_Products where p.User_Id == userId && p.Is_Deleted == false && p.Product_Name.ToLower().Contains(text.ToLower()) select new Product { ProductId = p.Product_Id, ProductName = p.Product_Name.Replace("’", "").Replace("\"", ""), RetailPrice = p.Retail_Price ?? 0M, LotSize = p.Lot_Size > 0 ? p.Lot_Size ?? 1 : 1, QuantityInHand = p.Quantity_In_Hand ?? 0 } But i need to search without any special characters...

  Read the article

• Separating data from the UI code with Linq to SQL entities

  - by Sir Psycho

  If it's important to keep data access 'away' from business and presentation layers, what alternatives or approaches can I take so that my LINQ to SQL entities can stay in the data access layer? So far I seem to be simply duplicating the classes produced by sqlmetal, and passing those object around instead simply to keep the two layers appart. For example, I have a table in my DB called Books. If a user is creating a new book via the UI, the Book class generated by sqlmetal seems like a perfect fit although I'm tightly coupling my design by doing so.

  Read the article

• LINQ Changeset multi-threading

  - by Xodarap

  I'm using LINQ to SQL and after I submit some changes I want to spawn a thread which looks through all the changes and updates our lucene index as necessary. My code looks vaguely like: (new Thread(() => { UpdateIndex(context.GetChangeSet()); }).Start(); Sometimes though I get an InvalidOperationException, which I think is because context.GetChangeSet() is not thread-safe, and so if the change set is modified in one thread while another thread is enumerating through it, problems arise. Is there a "thread-safe" version of GetChangeSet()? Or some way I can do ChangeSet.clone() or something?

  Read the article

• Getting differences between collections in LINQ

  - by dotnetdev

  Hi, I have a collection of image paths, and a larger collection of Image objects (Which contain a path property). I have the code to check for any matching images, but if there are supposed to be four matching image paths (as that is how many are in the first collection), and there is less than this, how can I get the missing one without writing loops? List<string> ImagesToCheck = new List<string>() { "", "s", "ssdd" }; IEnumerable<HtmlImage> Images = manager.ActiveBrowser.Find.AllControls<HtmlImage>(); var v = from i in Images where ImagesToCheck.Any(x => x == i.Src) select i; if (v.Count() < 3) { } So I need to get the items which are not in the collection titled v, but are in ImagesToCheck. How could I do this with LINQ? Thanks

  Read the article

• Compare two object lists with LINQ on specific property

  - by Niklas

  I have these two lists (where the Value in a SelectListItem is a bookingid): List<SelectListItem> selectedbookings; List<Booking> availableBookings; I need to find the ids from selectedBookings that are not in availableBookings. The LINQ join below will only get me the bookingids that are in availableBookings, and I'm not sure how to do it the other way around. != won't work since I'm comparing strings. results = ( from s in selectedbookings join a in availableBookings on s.bookingID.ToString() equals a.Value select s);

  Read the article

• LINQ to SQL DB Connections not closing

  - by Joe

  I am using LINQ to SQL in an asp.net mvc application. I am calling stored procedures via ajax calls. The active connections for 2-3 users goes to 100 active connections. and then server timeouts happen. I then used IOC -autofac to resuse the same repository that has a datacontext. now tho i get an active connection on the SQL server per loggedin user plus one. I have never seen this before. Why wouldnt Lin2sql not drop a connection when not in use? would calling a stored procedure in an ajax call in a loggedin session creat an a new active connection? Could a Stored Procedure with loops and or a waitfor hold open a connection??

  Read the article

• linq .net with dynamically generated controls

  - by Stuart

  This is a very strange problem and i really dont have a clue whats causing it. What is supposed to happen is that a call to the BLL then DAL returns some data via a linq SPROC call. The retunred IMultipleResults object is processed and all results stored in a hashtable. The hashtable is stored in session and then the UI layer uses these results to dynamically generate some gridviews. Easy you would think. But if i run the code i dont get any gridviews. If i take out the call to the BLL and DAL the gridviews appear but with nothing in them? Why is it the page renders correctly when i take out the call to get the data? Thanks.

  Read the article

• C# Reading multiple elements with same name using LINQ to XML

  - by hs2d

  Is there any better way doing this? My xml: <Template name="filename.txt"> <Property name="recordSeparator">\r\n</Property> <Property name="fieldCount">16</Property> </Template> Linq: var property = from template in xml.Descendants("Template") select new { recordDelim = template.Elements("Property").Where(prop => prop.Attribute("name").Value == "recordSeparator") .Select(f => new { f.Value }), fieldCount = template.Elements("Property").Where(prop => prop.Attribute("name").Value == "fieldCount") .Select(f => new { f.Value }) };

  Read the article

• Mapping LINQ to SQL table to another very similar table without iterating through every one

  - by Daniel Coffman

  Apologies for the vague question. Here it is: I have a table object created by LINQ to SQL. I am copying entries from one table to an "archive" table that has all the columns of the original, plus a couple extra ones. It feels sloppy to iterate through every object and manually define the mapping like: foreach (oldTable in dbContextOldTables) { var newTable = new NewTable(); newTable.TableID = oldTable.ID; newTable.Title = oldTable.Title; ... (repeat for twenty columns) newTable.ColumnThatIsntInOldTable = "Data that will be the same for every row"; dbContext.NewTables.InsertOnSubmit(newTable); } dbContext.SubmitChanges(); Is there a clever way to do this?

  Read the article

• Dynamic "WHERE IN" on IQueryable (linq to SQL)

  - by user320235

  I have a LINQ to SQL query returning rows from a table into an IQueryable object. IQueryable<MyClass> items = from table in DBContext.MyTable select new MyClass { ID = table.ID, Col1 = table.Col1, Col2 = table.Col2 } I then want to perform a SQL "WHERE ... IN ...." query on the results. This works fine using the following. (return results with id's ID1 ID2 or ID3) sQuery = "ID1,ID2,ID3"; string[] aSearch = sQuery.Split(','); items = items.Where(i => aSearch.Contains(i.ID)); What I would like to be able to do, is perform the same operation, but not have to specify the i.ID part. So if I have the string of the field name I want to apply the "WHERE IN" clause to, how can I use this in the .Contains() method?

  Read the article

• form data posted using linq-to-sql not showing until I refresh the page

  - by PeteShack

  I have an asp.net mvc app with a form. When you submit the form, it adds records to the sql database with linq-to-sql. After adding the records, the controller displays the form again, and should show those new values on the form. But, when it displays the form, the values are blank, until you refresh the page. While tracing through the code, I can see the records being added to the database when they are submitted, but the view doesnt display them, unless I refresh. The view is not the problem, it just displays the view model, which is missing the new records immediately after the post. I know this is kind of vague, but wasnt sure what parts of code to include here. Could this have something to do with data context life cycle? Basically, there is a data context created when the form is posted, then a different data context is created in the method that displays the form. Any suggestions on what might be causing this?

  Read the article

• Next Identity Key LINQ + SQL Server

  - by user569347

  To represent our course tree structure in our Linq Dataclasses we have 2 columns that could potentially be the same as the PK. My problem is that if I want to Insert a new record and populate 2 other columns with the PK that was generated there is no way I can get the next identity and stop conflict with other administrators who might be doing the same insert at the same time. Case: A Leaf node has right_id and left_id = itself (prereq_id) **dbo.pre_req:** prereq_id left_id right_id op_id course_id is_head is_coreq is_enforced parent_course_id and I basically want to do this: pre_req rec = new pre_req { left_id = prereq_id, right_id = prereq_id, op_id = 3, course_id = query.course_id, is_head = true, is_coreq = false, parent_course_id = curCourse.course_id }; db.courses.InsertOnSubmit(rec); try { db.SubmitChanges(); } Any way to solve my dilemma? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Help me construct this Linq statement

  - by Geoffrey

  There should be a simple Linq query for what I'm trying to accomplish, but I'm producing some ugly code. I have two tables, one of issues and another of issue status. There is a one-to-many relationship between issue and issue status. When an issue is created an IssueStatus is also created with the status field set to "Open" when it is closed, another IssueStatus is created with the status field set to "Closed" ... but issues can be re-opened. It seems like I should be able to write something like this: public static List<Issue> FindOpenIssues(this IList<Issue> issues) { return ( from issue in issues from issueStatus in issue.issueStatus.OrderBy(x=>x.CreatedOn).Single() where issueStatus.Status == "Open" select issue ).ToList(); } This obviously fails, but there must be a clean way to do this? Thanks!

  Read the article

• LINQ to SQL - Get only substring from a field

  - by domanokz

  I'm studying ASP.NET MVC and I use LINQ to SQL for model. I have a table named "Note" with the fields "Title" and "Content". The "Content" field can contain thousand characters. What I want to do is to display the LIST of notes in a page. I use table with two columns, for "Title" and SUBSTRING of the "Content" (50 characters). My problem is, I don't know how to edit the model so that it will display only the substring of the "Content". Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• Using LINQ to filter rows of a matrix based on inclusion in an array

  - by Bob Feng

  I have a matrix, IEnumerable<IEnumerable<int>> matrix, for example: { {10,23,16,20,2,4}, {22,13,1,33,21,11 }, {7,19,31,12,6,22}, ... } and another array: int[] arr={ 10, 23, 16, 20} I want to filter the matrix on the condition that I group all rows of the matrix which contain the same number of elements from arr. That is to say the first row in the matrix {10,23,16,20,2,4} has 4 numbers from arr, this array should be grouped with the rest of the rows with 4 numbers from arr. better to use linq, thank you very much!

  Read the article

• Linq to CSV select by column

  - by griegs

  If I have the following (sample) text file; year,2008,2009,2010 income,1000,1500,2000 dividends,100,200,300 net profit,1100,1700,2300 expenses,500,600,500 profit,600,1100,1800 Is there a way in Linq that I can select the expenses for 2010 only? So far I have the following which gets me all the data; var data = File.ReadAllLines(fileName) .Select( l => { var split = l.CsvSplit(); return split; } ); foreach (var item in data) Console.WriteLine("{0}: ${1}", item[0], item[1]);

  Read the article

• SQL to LINQ translating probem

  - by ognjenb

  I have problem with convertion this SQL statement to LINQ : SELECT a.Id, a.Name, a.ArtiklNumber, a.Notes, a.Weight, l.StartDate AS LastStartDate, l.LocationNameId, loc.Name AS CarrentLocation, a.Reserved FROM Accessories a LEFT OUTER JOIN Location l LEFT JOIN LocationName loc ON l.LocationNameId = loc.Id ON a.Id = (SELECT AccessoriesId FROM Location WHERE AccessoriesId = a.Id HAVING MAX(StartDate) = StartDate ) This is part of my translated code: testEntities6 accessoriesEntities = new testEntities6(); var max_StartDate = (from msd in accessoriesEntities.location from d in accessoriesEntities.device where msd.DeviceId == d.Id select msd.StartDate).Min(); var accessories_query = from accs in accessoriesEntities.accessories join l in accessoriesEntities.location on accs.Id equals l.AccessoriesId join loc in accessoriesEntities.locationname on l.LocationNameId equals loc.Id select new AccessoriesModel { //Accessories Id = accs.Id, Name = accs.Name, ArtiklNumber = accs.ArtiklNumber, Notes = accs.Notes, Weight = accs.Weight, Reserved = accs.Reserved, //Location LocationNameId = l.LocationNameId, StartDate = max_StartDate,//l.StartDate, //Locationname Loc_name = loc.Name };

  Read the article

• Select a Dictionary<T1, T2> with LINQ

  - by Rich

  I have used the "select" keyword and extension method to return an IEnumerable<T> with LINQ, but I have a need to return a generic Dictionary<T1, T2> and can't figure it out. The example I learned this from used something in a form similar to the following: IEnumerable<T> coll = from x in y select new SomeClass{ prop1 = value1, prop2 = value2 }; I've also done the same thing with extension methods. I assumed that since the items in a Dictionary<T1, T2> can be iterated as KeyValuePair<T1, T2> that I could just replace "SomeClass" in the above example with "new KeyValuePair<T1, T2> { ...", but that didn't work (Key and Value were marked as readonly, so I could not compile this code). Is this possible, or do I need to do this in multiple steps? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Calculate average in LINQ C# with string representation of property name

  - by Paul

  I need to calculate a whole bunch of averages on an List of Surveys. The surveys have lots of properties that are int and double valued. I am creating a business object to handle all the calculations (there are like 100) and I'd rather not code 100 different methods for finding the average for a particular property. I'd like to be able to have the UI pass a string (representing the property) and have the the business object return an average for that property. So, like... int AverageHeightInInches = MyObject.GetIntAverage("HeightInInches"); . . . Then have linq code to calculate the result. Thanks!

  Read the article

• Linq - Grouping where items fall in multiple groups?

  - by PirateKitten

  Is it possible using Linq to create a group where items fall into more than one group? Using the following trivial example: public class Data { public string ID; public int From; public int To; } And this list: List<Data> data = new List<Data>() { new Data() { ID = "A", From = 1, To = 3 }, // Call this A new Data() { ID = "B", From = 1, To = 2 }, // Call this B new Data() { ID = "C", From = 2, To = 3 } // Call this C }; I'd like to group by each possible integer in the ranges From and To (though instead of finding the min + max I could supply the query with the range I want, for example 1 to 3), and in each group would be a reference to the Data instance where the grouping int fits in its range. Hard to explain, easier to show each group and the instances I'd expect in each: [Group 1] 1 - A, B [Group 2] 2 - A, B, C [Group 3] 3 - A, C Is this possible? Or must groups be mutually exclusive?

  Read the article

• where clause in linq query

  - by masoud

  in the below code "transmittalno.TransID" always has value but "doctranstocon.Transid" sometimes has value and sometimes does not, so when "doctranstocon.Transid" has value I have no problem but when there is not any value, when compare in the where clause like :"transmittalno.TransID == doctranstocon.Transid". It returns error" Object reference not set to an instance of an object." TranstoCons = from doctranstocon in _DocTranstoCons where ( transmittalno.TransID == doctranstocon.Transid ) select doctranstocon.tblTranstoCon I like TranstoCons returns null when there is not any value for " doctranstocon.Transid " How I can handle this error in the below linq query: var query = from transmittalno in _Transmittals Select new TransmittaltoConPresentationModel { TransID = transmittalno.TransID, Transmittal = transmittalno.TRANSMITTAL, TranstoCons = from doctranstocon in _DocTranstoCons where ( transmittalno.TransID == doctranstocon.Transid ) select doctranstocon.tblTranstoCon };

  Read the article

• querying nested array elements in C#

  - by the berserker

  I have following object structure, deseralized from XML (WS): <ns2:Category> <ns2:CategoryId>800003</ns2:CategoryId> <ns2:CategoryName>Name1</ns2:CategoryName> <ns2:Categories> <ns2:Category> <ns2:CategoryId>800008</ns2:CategoryId> <ns2:CategoryName>Name2</ns2:CategoryName> <ns2:Categories> <ns2:Category> <ns2:CategoryId>800018</ns2:CategoryId> <ns2:CategoryName>Name3</ns2:CategoryName> <ns2:Categories/> </ns2:Category> <ns2:Category> <ns2:CategoryId>800028</ns2:CategoryId> <ns2:CategoryName>Name4</ns2:CategoryName> <ns2:Categories/> </ns2:Category> </ns2:Categories> </ns2:Category> <ns2:Category> <ns2:CategoryId>800009</ns2:CategoryId> <ns2:CategoryName>Name5</ns2:CategoryName> <ns2:Categories> <ns2:Category> <ns2:CategoryId>800019</ns2:CategoryId> <ns2:CategoryName>Name6</ns2:CategoryName> <ns2:Categories> <ns2:Category> <ns2:CategoryId>800119</ns2:CategoryId> <ns2:CategoryName>Name7</ns2:CategoryName> <ns2:Categories/> </ns2:Category> <ns2:Category> <ns2:CategoryId>800219</ns2:CategoryId> <ns2:CategoryName>Name111</ns2:CategoryName> <ns2:Categories/> </ns2:Category> </ns2:Categories> </ns2:Category> </ns2:Categories> </ns2:Category> </ns2:Categories> </ns2:Category> How would I find Category object with CategoryId 800119 efficiently? So, Im looking for something like FindCategory(long categoryId) - Prefferably with LINQ to objects. Any other option?

  Read the article

• Constructor or Explicit cast

  - by Felan

  In working with Linq to Sql I create a seperate class to ferry data to a web page. To simplify creating these ferry objects I either use a specialized constructor or an explicit conversion operator. I have two questions. First which approach is better from a readibility perspective? Second while the clr code that is generated appeared to be the same to me, are there situations where one would be treated different than the other by the compiler (in lambda's or such). Example code (DatabaseFoo uses specialized constructor and BusinessFoo uses explicit operator): public class DatabaseFoo { private static int idCounter; // just to help with generating data public int Id { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public DatabaseFoo() { Id = idCounter++; Name = string.Format("Test{0}", Id); } public DatabaseFoo(BusinessFoo foo) { this.Id = foo.Id; this.Name = foo.Name; } } public class BusinessFoo { public int Id { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public static explicit operator BusinessFoo(DatabaseFoo foo) { return FromDatabaseFoo(foo); } public static BusinessFoo FromDatabaseFoo(DatabaseFoo foo) { return new BusinessFoo {Id = foo.Id, Name = foo.Name}; } } public class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Creating the initial list of DatabaseFoo"); IEnumerable<DatabaseFoo> dafoos = new List<DatabaseFoo>() { new DatabaseFoo(), new DatabaseFoo(), new DatabaseFoo(), new DatabaseFoo(), new DatabaseFoo(), new DatabaseFoo()}; foreach(DatabaseFoo dafoo in dafoos) Console.WriteLine(string.Format("{0}\t{1}", dafoo.Id, dafoo.Name)); Console.WriteLine("Casting the list of DatabaseFoo to a list of BusinessFoo"); IEnumerable<BusinessFoo> bufoos = from x in dafoos select (BusinessFoo) x; foreach (BusinessFoo bufoo in bufoos) Console.WriteLine(string.Format("{0}\t{1}", bufoo.Id, bufoo.Name)); Console.WriteLine("Creating a new list of DatabaseFoo by calling the constructor taking BusinessFoo"); IEnumerable<DatabaseFoo> fufoos = from x in bufoos select new DatabaseFoo(x); foreach(DatabaseFoo fufoo in fufoos) Console.WriteLine(string.Format("{0}\t{1}", fufoo.Id, fufoo.Name)); } }

  Read the article

• Loading the last related record instantly for multiple parent records using Entity framework

  - by Guillaume Schuermans

  Does anyone know a good approach using Entity Framework for the problem described below? I am trying for our next release to come up with a performant way to show the placed orders for the logged on customer. Of course paging is always a good technique to use when a lot of data is available I would like to see an answer without any paging techniques. Here's the story: a customer places an order which gets an orderstatus = PENDING. Depending on some strategy we move that order up the chain in order to get it APPROVED. Every change of status is logged so we can see a trace for statusses and maybe even an extra line of comment per status which can provide some extra valuable information to whoever sees this order in an interface. So an Order is linked to a Customer. One order can have multiple orderstatusses stored in OrderStatusHistory. In my testscenario I am using a customer which has 100+ Orders each with about 5 records in the OrderStatusHistory-table. I would for now like to see all orders in one page not using paging where for each Order I show the last relevant Status and the extra comment (if there is any for this last status; both fields coming from OrderStatusHistory; the record with the highest Id for the given OrderId). There are multiple scenarios I have tried, but I would like to see any potential other solutions or comments on the things I have already tried. Trying to do Include() when getting Orders but this still results in multiple queries launched on the database. Each order triggers an extra query to the database to get all orderstatusses in the history table. So all statusses are queried here instead of just returning the last relevant one, plus 100 extra queries are launched for 100 orders. You can imagine the problem when there are 100000+ orders in the database. Having 2 computed columns on the database: LastStatus, LastStatusInformation and a regular Linq-Query which gets those columns which are available through the Entity-model. The problem with this approach is the fact that those computed columns are determined using a scalar function which can not be changed without removing the formula from the computed column, etc... In the end I am very familiar with SQL and Stored procedures, but since the rest of the data-layer uses Entity Framework I would like to stick to it as long as possible, even though I have my doubts about performance. Using the SQL approach I would write something like this: WITH cte (RN, OrderId, [Status], Information) AS ( SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY OrderId ORDER BY Id DESC), OrderId, [Status], Information FROM OrderStatus ) SELECT o.Id, cte.[Status], cte.Information AS StatusInformation, o.* FROM [Order] o INNER JOIN cte ON o.Id = cte.OrderId AND cte.RN = 1 WHERE CustomerId = @CustomerId ORDER BY 1 DESC; which returns all orders for the customer with the statusinformation provided by the Common Table Expression. Does anyone know a good approach using Entity Framework?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60  | Next Page >