linq extensions - Page 49

C# and Linq: Generating SQL Backup/Restore From Code

- by mdvaldosta

I'm working with a C# and Linq to SQL Winforms app and needed to integrate backup and restores through the program. I used SMO and got it working pretty smoothly. The issue, however, is that the app is deployed using ClickOnce, which I like very much - but since I had to include the dll's the download size jumped from 3mb = 15mb. I know they've only got to download it once, but it also sucks for me as Visual Studio 2010 seems to upload the dll's every time and that takes a while on AT&T broadband (eh). So, anyone have any suggestion on how I can work out an effective backup/restore solution without using SMO objects?

Read the article

help with linq query

- by Luis

Hi, i am trying to get some data, but i dont know how can i do a if in linq, this is how i am trying to do from so in db.Operations where ((opType!= "0" ? so.Operation == int.Parse(opType) : false) && (idState!=0 ? so.State == idState : false) && (start != null ? so.StartDate == start : false) && (end !=null ? so.EndDate == end : false)) select so the optype is a Int, the idState is a Int, end is a datetime, start is a datime what i am trying to do is, if those aren't null they add to the query function, so i can get all data together

Read the article

Make a Linq-to-SQL Generated User Class Inherit from MembershipUser

- by Adam Albrecht

I am currently building a custom Membership Provider for my Asp.net MVC website. I have an existing database with a Users table and I'm using Linq-to-Sql to automatically generates this class for me. What I would like to do is have this generated User class inherit from the MembershipUser class so I can more easily use it in my custom Membership Provider in methods such as GetUser. I already have all the necessary columns in the table. Is there any way to do this? Or am I going about this the completely wrong way? Thanks!

Read the article

LINQ DefaultIfEmpty(), generating inferred argument error

- by Refracted Paladin

I am trying to get the below linq query to return -1 if there isn't any current value. I was looking at this article on MSDN, here, and it seemed that DefaultIfEmpty() was what I wanted. Unfortunately, I am getting a The type arguments cannot be inferred from the usage. Try specifying the type arguments explicitly. error. I guess I am not sure what that means or what it is telling me to do. Can someone explain, please. public static int CheckForDRIID(int personID) { using (var context = ConnectDataContext.Create()) { var masterIndex = (from applicationAssociation in context.tblApplicationAssociations where applicationAssociation.ApplicationID == 1 && applicationAssociation.PersonID == personID select applicationAssociation.PersonApplicationID).DefaultIfEmpty(-1).Single(); return Convert.ToInt32(masterIndex); } }

Read the article

Populate DataTable with LINQ in C#

- by RaYell

I have a method in my app that populates DataTable with the data using the following code: DataTable dt = this.attachmentsDataSet.Tables["Attachments"]; foreach (Outlook.Attachment attachment in this.mailItem.Attachments) { DataRow dr = dt.NewRow(); dr["Index"] = attachment.Index; dr["DisplayName"] = String.Format( CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, "{0} ({1})", attachment.FileName, FormatSize(attachment.Size)); dr["Name"] = attachment.FileName; dr["Size"] = attachment.Size; dt.Rows.Add(dr); } I was wondering if I could achieve the same functionality using LINQ in order to shorten this code a bit. Any ideas?

Read the article

Group by/count in LINQ against SQL Compact 3.5 SP2

- by bash74

Hello, I am using LINQ-To-Entities in C# and run queries against a SQL Compact Server 3.5 SP2. What I try to achieve is a simple group by with an additional where clause which includes a Count(). var baseIdent="expression"; var found=from o in ObservedElements where o.ObservedRoots.BaseIdent==baseIdent group o by o.ID into grouped where grouped.Count()==1 select new {key=grouped.Key, val=grouped}; foreach(var res in found){ //do something here } This query throws the famous exception "A parameter is not allowed in this location. Ensure that the '@' sign and all other parameters are in a valid location in the SQL statement." When I either omit the where clause OR directly enter the expression "expression" in the query (where o.ObservedRoots.BaseIdent=="expression") everything just works fine. Does anybody know how to solve this? Workaround would also be fine? Thanks in advance, Sebastian

Read the article

joining two sets in LINQ

- by user343209

Read the article

How Manage Big Linq DataContext ?

- by Rev

Hi The major problem in .net programs is "How manage memory for best performance". so Microsoft use garbage collector in .net and with that, we don't need to do something for managing memory(or better say we can use GC easily) But when you develop big project(business app), you make too many tables and database for your own project. so if you use Linq-to-sql, we must build DataContext include hundred or more tables. That make problem for program when you create an object from datacontext, that object give big amount of memory. also we cant divide datacontext to datacontexts(cuz relation between tables) so "How manage datacontext and memory"?

Read the article

Accessing Linq data in telerik grid ItemCreated method

- by Jack

Not sure if the title of this question makes sense, but here's my problem: I have a telerik grid bound to a Linq data object, however, I limit the fields returned: <IQueryable>filter = data.Select(x => new {x.ID, x.Name, x.Age}); I would like to access these fields in the ItemCreated method of the grid: protected void rgPeople_ItemCreated(object sender, GridItemEventArgs e) { Telerik.Web.UI.GridDataItem item = (GridDataItem)e.Item; ?????? Person = (???????)e.Item.DataItem; } What do I declare ?????? as so that I can use: String ID = Person.ID; String Name = Person.Name; etc

Read the article

Linq-to-Sql not detecting change in xml

- by porum

I have an xml field (Answers) in Sql Server, but when changing the content via Linq-to-Sql, the record is not flagged for updating. e.g. in Linqpad... var profile = Profiles.FirstOrDefault(p => p.Answers != null); profile.Answers.SetAttributeValue("date", DateTime.Now.ToString()); GetChangeSet().Dump(); // nothing flagged profile.Answers = new XElement(profile.Answers); // ends up with correct xml GetChangeSet().Dump(); // record is flagged as changed Any suggestions apart from assigning a clone of itself to the field or storing the xml as a string to force the update?

Read the article

Linq query with subquery as comma-separated values

- by Keith

In my application, a company can have many employees and each employee may have have multiple email addresses. The database schema relates the tables like this: Company - CompanyEmployeeXref - Employee - EmployeeAddressXref - Email I am using Entity Framework and I want to create a LINQ query that returns the name of the company and a comma-separated list of it's employee's email addresses. Here is the query I am attempting: from c in Company join ex in CompanyEmployeeXref on c.Id equals ex.CompanyId join e in Employee on ex.EmployeeId equals e.Id join ax in EmployeeAddressXref on e.Id equals ax.EmployeeId join a in Address on ax.AddressId equals a.Id select new { c.Name, a.Email.Aggregate(x=x + ",") } Desired Output: "Company1", "[email protected],[email protected],[email protected]" "Company2", "[email protected],[email protected],[email protected]" ... I know this code is wrong, I think I'm missing a group by, but it illustrates the point. I'm not sure of the syntax. Is this even possible? Thanks for any help.

Read the article

Linq to Entities - left Outer Join

- by user255234

Could you please help me to figure this one out? I need to replace a join with OSLP table with OUTER join. Seems a bit tricky for someone who is not an expert in Linq to entities. How would I do that? var surgeonList = ( from item in context.T1_STM_Surgeon .Include("T1_STM_SurgeonTitle") .Include("OTER") where item.ID == surgeonId join reptable in context.OSLP on item.Rep equals reptable.SlpCode select new { ID = item.ID, First = item.First, Last = item.Last, Rep = reptable.SlpName, Reg = item.OTER.descript, PrimClinic = item.T1_STM_ClinicalCenter.Name, Titles = item.T1_STM_SurgeonTitle, Phone = item.Phone, Email = item.Email, Address1 = item.Address1, Address2 = item.Address2, City = item.City, State = item.State, Zip = item.Zip, Comments = item.Comments, Active = item.Active, DateEntered = item.DateEntered }).ToList(); Thanks in advance!!

Read the article

Linq to SQL gives NotSupportedException when using local variables

- by zwanz0r

It appears to me that it matters whether you use a variable to temporary store an IQueryable or not. See the simplified example below: This works: List<string> jobNames = new List<string> { "ICT" }; var ictPeops = from p in dataContext.Persons where ( from j in dataContext.Jobs where jobNames.Contains(j.Name) select j.ID).Contains(p.JobID) select p; But when I use a variable to temporary store the subquery I get an exception: List<string> jobNames = new List<string> { "ICT" }; var jobs = from j in dataContext.Jobs where jobNames.Contains(j.Name) select j.ID; var ictPeops = from p in dataContext.Persons where jobs.Contains(p.JobID) select p; "System.NotSupportedException: Queries with local collections are not supported" I don't see what the problem is. Isn't this logic that is supposed to work in LINQ?

Read the article

LINQ - Contains with anonymous type

- by Marlos

When using this code (simplified for asking): var rows1 = (from t1 in db.TABLE1 where (t1.COLUMN_A == 1) select new { t1.COLUMN_B, t1.COLUMN_C }); var rows2 = (from t2 in db.TABLE2 where (rows1.Contains(t2.COLUMN_A)) select t2; I got the following error: The type arguments for method 'System.Linq.Enumerable.Contains(System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable, TSource)' cannot be inferred from the usage. Try specifying the type arguments explicitly. I need to filter the first result by COLUMN_B, but I don't know how. Is there a way to filter it?

Read the article

Linq to SQL Where clause based on field selected at runtime

- by robasaurus

I'm trying to create a simple reusable search using LINQ to SQL. I pass in a list of words entered in a search box. The results are then filtered based on this criteria. private IQueryable<User> BasicNameSearch(IQueryable<User> usersToSearch, ICollection<string> individualWordsFromSearch) { return usersToSearch .Where(user => individualWordsFromSearch.Contains(user.Forename.ToLower()) || individualWordsFromSearch.Contains(user.Surname.ToLower())); } Now I want this same search functionality on a different datasource and want to dynamically select the fields to apply the search to. For instance instead of IQueryable of Users I may have an IQueryable of Cars and instead of firstname and surname the search goes off Make and Model. Basically the goal is to reuse the search logic by dynamically selecting what to search on at runtime.

Read the article

How to delete data in DB efficiently using LinQ to NHibernate (one-shot-delete)

- by kastanf

Hello, producing software for customers, mostly using MS SQL but some Oracle, a decision was made to plunge into Nhibernate (and C#). The task is to delete efficiently e.g. 10 000 rows from 100 000 and still stay sticked to ORM. I've tried named queries - link already, IQuery sql = s.GetNamedQuery("native-delete-car").SetString(0, "Kirsten"); sql.ExecuteUpdate(); but the best I have ever found seems to be: using (ITransaction tx = _session.BeginTransaction()) { try { string cmd = "delete from Customer where Id < GetSomeId()"; var count = _session.CreateSQLQuery(cmd).ExecuteUpdate(); ... Since it may not get into dB to get all complete rows before deleting them. My questions are: If there is a better way for this kind of delete. If there is a possibility to get the Where condition for Delete like this: Having a select statement (using LinQ to NHibernate) = which will generate appropriate SQL for DB = we get that Where condition and use it for Delete. Thanks :-)

Read the article

Linq like or other construction

- by Yauhen Kavalenka

I have DB oracle in my solution. I want to have some results in this query. Query example: select * from doctor where doctor.name like '%IVANOV_A%'; But if i do it at LINQ i cannot get any result. from p in repository.Doctor.Where(x => x.Name.ToLower().Containsname)) select p; Where 'name' is variable of string parameter. Web layout request next string: "Ivanov a" or "A Ivanov" But i suggest for user choose you pattetn for query. How i can to get "patient by name" if name consist of "First name" and "Last name" but user doesn't know your doctor's full name?

Read the article

Get the first and second objects from a list using LINQ

- by Vahid

I have a list of Person objects. How can I get the first and second Person objects that meet a certain criteria from List<Person> People using LINQ? Let's say here is the list I've got. How can I get the first and second persons that are over 18 that is James and Jodie. public class Person { public string Name; public int age; } var People = new List<Person> { new Person {Name = "Jack", Age = 15}, new Person {Name = "James" , Age = 19}, new Person {Name = "John" , Age = 14}, new Person {Name = "Jodie" , Age = 21}, new Person {Name = "Jessie" , Age = 19} }

Read the article

Grouping a generic list via LINQ in VB.NET

- by CD Smith

I need to take a collection and group it via Linq but all the examples I've seen fail in some manner or other with some syntax difference that I can't quite lick. My collection: Dim a As New List(Of ProcessAlert) a.Add(New ProcessAlert("0000112367", "[email protected]", "Alert", 2)) a.Add(New ProcessAlert("0000112367", "[email protected]", "Document", 2)) a.Add(New ProcessAlert("0000112367", "[email protected]", "Note", 2)) a.Add(New ProcessAlert("0000112367", "[email protected]", "Alert", 1)) a.Add(New ProcessAlert("0000112367", "[email protected]", "Document", 1)) a.Add(New ProcessAlert("0000112367", "[email protected]", "Note", 1)) Return a I need to turn this collection into a simple way to give this final outcome: "[email protected]", "Alert, Document, Note" "[email protected]", "Alert, Document, Note" Here's the definition of the ProcessAlert class: Public Class ProcessAlert Public LoanNumber As String Public EmailAddress As String Public AlertType As String Public AlertMethodID As Byte End Class Thanks in advance, CD

Read the article

NHibernate Linq queries not returning data saved in the same transaction

- by Andrew

Hi, I have a situation where I am using NHibernate in a WCF service and using a TransactionScope for the transaction management. NHibernate enlists in the ambient transaction fine, but, any changes I make and save inside the transaction, are not visible to any queries I make while still in that transaction. So if I add an entity and session.save() it, then further on in the code, there is a linq query against that entities table, the entity I just added is not returned. Strangely this seems to work fine if I use explicit NHibernate transactions in my tests. Anyone have any ideas as to why and what I can do about it? Many thanks Andrew

Read the article

LINQ to SQL: Issue with concurrency

- by Gib

I’m working on a sandwich ordering app in ASP.NET MVC, C# and LINQ to SQL. The app revolves around the user creating multiple custom-made sandwiches from a selection of ingredients. When it comes to confirming the order I need to know that there’s enough portions of each ingredient to fulfil all the sandwiches in the user’s order before I commit to the DB as it is possible that an ingredient will go out of stock between adding it to their basket and confirming the order. A bit about the database: Ingredient – Stores ingredient details including number of portions Order – Header table for an order, simply stores the order time OrderDetail – Stores a record of each sandwich in an order OrderDetailItem – Stores each ingredient in each sandwich in an order So basically I’m wondering what the best approach to ensuring that before I add records to Order, OrderDetail and OrderDetailItem I can ensure that the order can be met.

Read the article

Check for Existence of a Result in Linq-to-xml

- by NateD

I'm using Linq-to-XML to do a simple "is this user registered" check (no security here, just making a list of registered users for a desktop app). How do I handle the result from a query like this: var people = from person in currentDoc.Descendants("Users") where (string)person.Element("User") == searchBox.Text select person; I understand the most common way to use the result would be something like foreach (var line in people){ //do something here } but what do you do if person comes back empty, which is what would happen if the person isn't registered? I've looked around on this site and on MSDN and haven't found a really clear answer yet. Extra credit: Give a good explanation of what people contains.

Read the article

Linq to sql Incorrect varchar length

- by scott

I have a table with a nullable varchar(50) column in it. When I am updating the value through linq to sql and trace the call in profiler it is defining the parameter as varchar(36). This is obviously causing some minor issues when we are trying to insert data that is between 37 and 50 characters long. I have tried removing the table and re-adding it to the design surface but the same thing happens. I also tried removing that property and adding it manually, same issue. When I look at the designer.cs code it shows the attribute properly: [Column(Storage="_Name", DbType="VarChar(50)")] I am out of ideas, anybody seen this before? Every other column is correct.

Read the article

subqueries linq

- by user297378

Hey all I am trying to do a subquery in linq but the subquery is a value and it seems to not be working, can anyone help out? I am using the entit frame work I keep getting and int to string error not sure why. from lrp in remit.log_record_product join lr in remit.log_record on lrp.log_record_id equals lr.log_record_id where (lrp.que_submit_date >= RadDatePickerStartDate.SelectedDate) && (lrp.que_submit_date <= RadDatePickerEndDate.SelectedDate) select new { lrp.que_submit_date, lr.officer_name, lr.c_fname, lr.c_lname, lrp.price_sold, lrp.product_cost, gap_account_number = (from gap in remit.gap_contracts where gap.log_record_product_id == lrp.log_record_product_id select gap.account_number), iui_account_number = (from iui in remit.iui_contracts where iui.log_record_product_id == lrp.log_record_product_id select iui.account_number), dp_account_number = (from dp in remit.dp_contracts where dp.log_record_product_id == lrp.log_record_product_id select dp.account_number), mpd_account_number = (from mpd in remit.mbp_contracts where mpd.log_record_product_id == lrp.log_record_product_id select mpd.product_account_number) }

Read the article

LINQ to SQL stored procedures with multiple results in Visual Studio 2008

- by Jeremy

I'm using visual studio 2008 and I've created a stored procedure that selects back two different result sets. I drag the stored proc on to a linq to sql dbml datacontext class, causing visual studio to create the following code in the cs file: [Function(Name="dbo.List_MultiSelect")] public ISingleResult<DataAccessLayer.DataEntities.List_MultiSelectResult> List_MultiSelect() { IExecuteResult result = this.ExecuteMethodCall(this, ((MethodInfo)(MethodInfo.GetCurrentMethod()))); return ((ISingleResult<DataAccessLayer.DataEntities.List_MultiSelectResult>)(result.ReturnValue)); } Shouldn't the designer generate the code to use IMultipleResults? Or do I have to hand code that?

Search Results

Search found 7676 results on 308 pages for 'linq extensions'.

Page 49/308 | < Previous Page | 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 | Next Page >

- by mdvaldosta

- by Luis

- by Adam Albrecht

- by Refracted Paladin

- by RaYell

- by bash74

- by user343209

- by Rev

- by Jack

- by porum

- by Keith

- by user255234

- by zwanz0r

- by Marlos

- by robasaurus

- by kastanf

- by Yauhen Kavalenka

- by Vahid

- by CD Smith

- by Andrew

- by Gib

- by NateD

- by scott

- by user297378

- by Jeremy

< Previous Page | 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 | Next Page >